Next Article in Journal
Development of Perovskite (MACl)0.33FA0.99MA0.01Pb(I0.99Br0.01)3 Solar Cells via n-Octylammonium Iodide Surface Passivation
Previous Article in Journal
Semiconductor-to-Insulator Transition in Inter-Electrode Bridge-like Ensembles of Anatase Nanoparticles under a Long-Term Action of the Direct Current
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unbiased and Signal-Weakening Photoelectrochemical Hexavalent Chromium Sensing via a CuO Film Photocathode
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fast-Response Micro-Phototransistor Based on MoS2/Organic Molecule Heterojunction

1
Material Systems for Nanoelectronics, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany
2
Leibniz-Institute für Festköper- und Werkstoffforschung Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
3
Research Center for Materials, Architectures, and Integration of Nanomembranes (MAIN), Chemnitz University of Technology, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany
4
Department of Physics, School of Science, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
5
School of Science, Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany
6
State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(9), 1491; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13091491
Submission received: 21 March 2023 / Revised: 21 April 2023 / Accepted: 24 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023

Abstract

:
Over the past years, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has been the most extensively studied two-dimensional (2D) semiconductormaterial. With unique electrical and optical properties, 2DMoS2 is considered to be a promising candidate for future nanoscale electronic and optoelectronic devices. However, charge trapping leads to a persistent photoconductance (PPC), hindering its use for optoelectronic applications. To overcome these drawbacks and improve the optoelectronic performance, organic semiconductors (OSCs) are selected to passivate surface defects, tune the optical characteristics, and modify the doping polarity of 2D MoS2. Here, we demonstrate a fast photoresponse in multilayer (ML) MoS2 by addressing a heterojunction interface with vanadylphthalocyanine (VOPc) molecules. The MoS2/VOPc van der Waals interaction that has been established encourages the PPC effect in MoS2 by rapidly segregating photo-generated holes, which move away from the traps of MoS2 toward the VOPc molecules. The MoS2/VOPc phototransistor exhibits a fast photo response of less than 15 ms for decay and rise, which is enhanced by 3ordersof magnitude in comparison to that of a pristine MoS2-based phototransistor (seconds to tens of seconds). This work offers a means to realize high-performance transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD)-based photodetection with a fast response speed.

1. Introduction

MoS2 is a transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductor with excellent optoelectronic properties [1,2,3,4]. With their unique and interesting physical properties, such as thickness-dependent energy band gap, stacking structures, and giant magnetoresistance (GMR), two-dimensional (2D)-layered van der Waals (vdW) materials have received a lot of attention. MoS2 is a promising TMD material for low-power devices due to its intrinsic band gap of 1.2–1.9 eV [5,6]. Due to the synthesis of numerous 2D-layered vdW materials, such as TMDs, and the development of innovative electronic/optoelectronic applications, the field of 2D vdW materials has progressed significantly [7,8,9,10].
In terms of photodetectors with PPC, MoS2-based devices face many issues, such as trap states in MoS2 and minority carrier capturing by absorbents [11]. Although minority carrier trapping can play an essential role in enhancing the gain mechanism with a long carrier lifetime, the device reaction time is drastically reduced since the PPC effect usually lasts for hours [12,13]. However, an optimization of the response dynamics, for example, a modification of the density of states, surface passivation, or field-effect approaches, results in the loss of sensitivity because trap-induced gain processes are adversely suppressed [14,15,16]. The well-established photodetectors with carrier segregation and capturing at the interfaces contribute to optimizing the detection bandwidth and sensitivity [17].
As a result of the rapid photovoltaic charge transfer in the presence of an internal electric field and type II band alignment, fast gain mechanisms are obtained. However, material growth and device integration, with the predominant vdW connections, are still challenging. Nanocrystal devices, for example, frequently suffer from stability problems [18]. For the creation of 2D TMD-based detectors, an innovative acceptable charge-transfer interface construction on the 2D surfaces is extremely appealing [19,20]. The atomically thin nature of 2D TMDs enables charge-transfer coupling with nearby substrates and surface absorbents, such as atmospheric O2 and moisture. Due to this feature, it is conceivable to tune the properties of the TMD by exploiting surface-assembled charge transport systems [21,22]. Organic molecules that can interact with the interface of 2D TMDs have been explored intensively to tailor the doping polarity through surface defects [23] and tune the photoluminescence characteristics of 2D TMDs. Fundamental organic photovoltaic materials have been demonstrated to exhibit rapid charge couplings with 2D TMDs [24,25]. The organic molecules with a π-conjugated system enhance the charge transport path, improving the photo response behavior of 2D TMD materials [26,27].
In this work, a platform is proposed to achieve fast photo response dynamics inmultilayer (ML) MoS2 phototransistors by the deposition of vanadyl phthalocyanine (VOPc) organic molecules. Vanadyl phthalocyanine (VOPc) possesses the highest third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility and the fastest optical response (less than 10 ps) [28]. Because of its high mobility (1 cm2/(Vs)), it has been used in the creation of an organic field effect transistor. As a result, we investigated its potential use as an active material in the development of micro phototransistor heterojunction devices [29]. The deflection of the electrons from the MoS2 induced by the assembly of VOPc molecules compensates the intrinsic electron doping effect on the surface of the MoS2. This charge transfer mechanism allows the generation of electron-hole pairs under illumination, guiding the holes to the VOPc molecules and suppressing the trapping of minority carriers at the substrate that reduces the potential, leading to an increased reaction rate.

2. Experimental

2.1. The Characterizations of ML MoS2

Using the Scotch tape method, a ML MoS2 was mechanically cleaved from a MoS2 bulk crystal (SPI Supplies) and transferred onto a silicon substrate. The device with a ML of MoS2 was heated to 250 °C for 2 h under aN2 gas atmosphere (100 sccm flow) to remove impurities and enhance the interfacial adhesion to the substrate. Photoluminance (PL) and Raman measurements were carried out at ambient temperature. A blue laser λ = 458   nm was used as an excitation source and the signal was collected usinga confocal setup (Lab RAM HR Evolution, Horiba, Kyodo, Japan). The laser beam had a spot size of 0.77μm (10 × 0.25: working distance 10 mm). The laser power was ≤5 kW·cm−2 to suppress a thermal degradation of the sample.

2.2. Micro-Photo FETs Fabrication and Measurements

MoS2 MLs were exfoliated from bulk crystals of molybdenite (SPI Supplies) usingthe Scotchtape method and then transferred onto Si/SiO2 (1 μmSiO2) substrates. A photoresist (AZ-5214E) was then spin-coated at 4500 rpm for 45 s, leading to a 1 μm thickness, and baked at 90 °C for 5 min. After patterning the chip with standard photolithography, Cr/Au (10/50 nm) film was deposited with a deposition rate of 0.5 nm min−1 to develop the contact electrodes using a thermal evaporator system. The micro-photo FETs were characterized in a probe station (Form Factor GmbH EPS150RF, Thiendorf, Germany) employing an oscilloscope (VOLTCRAFT DSO-1254F, Conrad Electronic, Germany) and a function generator (Tektronix AFG 3252, Instrumex GmbH, Sauerlach, Germany) (Figure S2b). All measurements were performed under ambient conditions.

2.3. Growth of VOPc Thin Films

In a physical vapor deposition (PVD) system (Moor field Minilab 060, Moorfield Nanotechnology Limited, Knutsford, Cheshire, UK), the organic semiconductor VOPc (Sigma–Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany) was deposited, while the samples were kept at ambient temperature. The VOPc was deposited at a rate of 0.02–0.03 nm min−1 at 10−5 Pa. AFM (Bruker Icon Agilent 5500, tapping mode, Athens, Greece) was used to obtain the topographical image of the sample.

3. Results

In this work, to create the vdW molecules2D TMDs heterojunction, the ML MoS2 was utilized to investigate the optical properties as a phototransistor. The optical image of the multilayer MoS2 phototransistor is shown in Figure 1a. The microstructural fabrication process of a MoS2/VOPc heterojunction phototransistor is depicted in Figure S3. Figure 1b shows the devices of a 2D TMDs and a vdW molecule TMD heterojunction phototransistor. The Si substrate acts as a back gate for the field-effect modulation. Evidence of being a multilayer MoS2 is supported by the Raman spectroscopy measurements (Figure 1c). The Raman spectra of ML MoS2 show two characteristic peaks, named E12g (in-plane vibration) and A1g (out-of-plane vibration), at 389 and 413 cm–1, respectively [30]. The difference between these two Raman modes (Δ = A1g − E12g) is approximately 24 cm–1, reveali ng multilayers [31].
How the charge is transported at the interface of MoS2 (n-type semiconductor) and VOPc (p-type organic molecule) is a key phenomenon to enhance the performance and understand the mechanism of a hetero phototransistor device. In 2D TMD heterojunctions containing VOPc, a distinct charge transfer mechanism was observed [32,33]. Due to this effect, electrons are transferred from VOPc to MoS2. In the dark state, the electrons and holes recombine at the interface, respectively, driving the energy band bending. In the dark state, the accumulation of electrons and holes at the interface leads to the recombination of these charge carriers, which drives the energy band bending. The energy band bending occurs because the accumulation of charge carriers at the interface changes the local electric field, which affects the distribution of energy levels in the semiconductor layers. VOPc, having the highest occupied molecular orbit (HOMO) level of approximately 5.1 eV, provides an energy path for the holes Furthermore, VOPc organic molecule, with a HOMO level of approximately 5.1 eV, provides an energy path for the holes. This means that the energy levels in VOPc are such that holes can easily move through the material. (Figure 1d) [33,34,35]. The height of MoS2 (~230 nm) is measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Figure 1e). The morphology of VOPc molecules (~3 nm) shows the full surface coverage (Figure 1f). The morphology of the film is non-uniform and coarse with particle-like features [36]. Non-uniform and particle-like features indicate the VOPc deposition [37]. The measurements ofthe PL emission and transmittance show the optical characteristics of MoS2 (Figure S1) [33,38].
Shifting the binding energy corresponding to defective/sub-stoichiometric 2D materials is an essential factor in understanding the heterojunction effect, which is the primary mechanism directing the charge transfer interface between the organic and 2D materials [32,38]. Forinstance, in the case of the ZnPc-covered MoS2 surface, the XPS spectra of pristine MoS2 show the main regions (Mo 3d, S 2p). These two characteristic peaks lie at 229.4 and 232.5 eV in the XPS spectrum [33,39]. From pristine MoS2 to ZnPc organic-molecule-covered MoS2, the binding energy is shifted from 0.22 to 0.25 eV, which indicates the charge transfer phenomenon from the organic molecules to the 2D materials [39].
The type-II band alignment present in most heterostructures with a single layer (SL) MoS2 enables the transfer of electrons from the lowest unoccupied molecular orbit (LUMO) of the metallated phthalocyanine (MPc) to the conduction band minima (CBM) of MoS2, and of the holes to the highest occupied molecular orbit (HOMO) of the MPcs under photoexcitation. Recently, in the case of VOPc-coupled SL MoS2, PL spectra revealed a blue shift for VOPc from 875 nm to 865 nm and a red shift for MoS2 from 660 nm to 674 nm [40]. These results indicate a reduction of the bandgap of MoS2 due to a lower concentration of free radicals in the depletion region, and a charge transfer from the organic molecules to MoS2 [40]. Additionally, negative ground state bleach measurements reveal a specific negative signal in the heterojunction above 730 nm, absent from the original SL MoS2 layer. After photoexcitation, the signal originates from the active interface between MoS2 and VOPc [40].
Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy is used to reveal the band alignment at the junction, providing additional proof of the heterojunction effect. The Fermi level (EF) is used to describe the binding energy in UPS spectra. In the case of ZnPc-covered MoS2, it was reported that the valence band maximum (VBM) of pristine and ZnPc-covered MoS2 lies at 1.45 and 1.2 eV below EF, respectively [35,41]. Shifting of the VBM towards EF in ZnPc-covered MoS2 illustrates that electron doping in MoS2 is mitigated due to ZnPc molecules [33,42].
For a better understanding of the charge transfer interaction between VOPc and MoS2, the photoresponse behavior of VOPc-covered MoS2 detectors is vital. First, the MoS2 device’s field-effect transfer curves are measured before and after depositing the VOPc molecules (Figure 2a). With a source-drain bias of (Vds) and a gate voltage (Vg) of 2 V, the measurements were performed in the dark and under illumination (530 nm, 5 mW/cm2). The measured transfer curves show the n-type conduction due to the Fermi level pinning effect, demonstrating the electrons as majority charge [41,42,43]. The MoS2 phototransistor with VOPc shows a reduction of the source-drain current (Ids) and the threshold voltage (Vth) shifts toward the positive direction. Furthermore, a pronounced electron compensation effect is observed under dark and illumination conditions. The n-type conduction in the positive direction demonstrates that the main cause of the trapping of the photo-generated holes in comparison to electrons in MoS2 is a significant n-type photo-doping effect [44,45].
A direct comparison of the response dynamics for the pristine MoS2 and ~3 nm VOPc-coveredMoS2 is shown in Figure 2b. The photoresponse persists for seconds for the pristine MoS2 (Figure 2b). This phenomenon was already studied in exfoliated (mechanically cleavage) and direct-grown (CVD) MoS2, where it was suggested that the slow hole capturing and releasing originates due to defect states or as a consequence of substrate interactions [42,46]. By contrast, the devices with VOPc molecules coupled to the surface of MoS2 show a photo response improvement. A steep rise and decay of the photoresponse is observed under on and offlight conditions as seen in Figure 2e,f. The mobilities, the charge carries’ densities, and the threshold voltages of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPc heterojunction phototransistors lie between 47 cm2/Vs and 27 cm2/Vs, 2.7 × 1010 cm2 and 0.6 × 1010 cm2, and 19 V and −5 V, respectively, in the dark and under illuminated conditions (Figure S4) [47].
Figure 2b illustrates how adding VOPc molecules to the surface increases the photo response kinetics in the phototransistor. After the device is covered by VOPc, it exhibits a sharp photocurrent rise and decline in the dark and under illumination. Figure 2c–f compares the response dynamics for pristine MoS2 with that of VOPc-covered MoS2 (~3 nm). The photo response of pristine MoS2 is seen to last for many seconds. The effect is comparable to PCC, previously observed in both mechanically and CVD-grown MoS2. In both cases, the effect was related to the slow minority hole entrapment and their decay at the contested surface-absorbed molecules, defect states, and substrate interfaces. In both cases, the PCC effect has been related to the slow minority hole entrapment and their decay at the interface between the MoS2 layer and the substrate, as well as at surface-absorbed molecules and defect states. [48,49]. Here, we show that the slow photo response dynamics of MoS2 can be considerably improved by covering it with~3 nm VOPc, leading to the fast rise and decay times of 5 and 11 ms, respectively. Figure 2e,f enhanced the photoresponse by three orders of magnitude compared to that of pristine MoS2 [50].
The photo-generated carrier relaxation processes in pristine and heterojunction phototransistors are illustrated in Figure 3a. In the pristine MoS2 FETs, oxygen molecules attach to the MoS2 surface electrons O 2 + e O 2 with a weak binding energy, leading to a notable decrease in the MoS2 channel conductivity (panel I) [51]. However, under laser irradiation, the absorbed oxygen molecules can desorb, reducing the trap states, and resulting in an enhancement of the conductivity of the active MoS2 region (panel II) [51]. This persists until the oxygen molecules reabsorb. The photo-generated electrons predominantly contribute to an increased current in the pristine MoS2 phototransistor, as opposed to the photo-generated holes, which move along the active region at the surface for the interaction with the melectrons (panel III in Figure 3a) [51]. which show the gradual enhancement of the drain current to the saturation area in the laser pulse irradiation This process results in a gradual enhancement of the drain current to the saturation area in the laser pulse irradiation.. An accumulation of the photo-generated electrons continues in the active areauntil anequilibrium stateis achieved after multiple absorption and desorption cycles of oxygen molecules. After a number absorption and desorption cycles of oxygen molecules, photo-generated electrons continue to accumulate in the active area until an equilibrium state is achieved [52,53].
By contrast, in the VOPc-covered MoS2 FET, the oxygen molecules are unable to interact with the surface. Due to the disparity in the carrier concentrations, the main carriers of each layer (i.e., holes in p-type VOPc and electrons in n-type MoS2) recombine at the contact surface in the absence of light (panelIV), hence, forming a depleted region and resulting in a reduced dark current (as shown in Figure 2a). Due to the absence of oxygen molecules in the active area during illumination, the drain current can attain the saturation mode and ramp up quickly (see Figure 2b). During the laser irradiation, an equal number of photo-generated electrons and holes constantly accumulate at the contact surface of MoS2 and VOPc (panel V). As the light is switched off, the photo-generatedholes in VOPc film and electrons in MoS2 quickly recombine (panel VI) [40].
Figure 3c shows schematic band diagrams of MoS2 and VOPc having the reported energy levels of VB, CB, HOMO, and LUMO of 5.2 eV, 4.2 eV, 5.1 eV, and 3.7 eV, respectively [40]. The charge transfer from VOPc to MoS2 leads to different Fermi levels. In the proximity of the MoS2, the confined holes of the organic molecules accumulate, creating an internal electric field at the interfaces [40,49], promoting interfacial band bending and allowing the electrons to tunnel from MoS2 to VOPc molecules, resulting in a photo-excited exciton separation. Due to the device’s charge neutrality, the direct photo-generated electron-hole pairs and free electrons make up the equilibrium photocurrent, which is the counterbalance of the holes.
As shown in Figure 3c, after a forward bias voltage is applied, the electrons accumulate in the MoS2 region and at the interface with the SiO2 substrate, while the holes are pushed out. Following the breakdown of the free electron and hole equilibrium by an external gate bias, the holes begin to escape from the trap states until a new equilibrium is achieved. Thus, by measuring the transient current, it is possible to determine the escape time constants for the holes under an illumination.
Figure 4a depicts the power intensity-dependent responsivity of the phototransistor device’s performance. The responsivity of a phototransistor device can be expressed by
R = I   i l l u m I   d a r k   P   i l l u m
where I i l l u m , I d a r k , and P i l l u m are illuminated, dark current, and power of the light that illuminates the operating region of the device [34].
The responsivity was calculated at different power intensity values. For the pristine and VOPc-covered MoS2 at the lowest light intensity (500 nW/cm2), the responsivity (R) is 380 and 240 mA/W, respectively. It is seen that the R steadily increases for both devices as the light intensity increases. The photocurrent vs. power intensity can be fitted to a power law dependence of the form Iphα P1.1 (Figure S2a). Within comparison to other 2D material hetero and hybrid structures, we fabricated fast ML phototransistors (Table S1) [35,51,54,55,56].
To determine the reproducibility and an average rise and decay duration, three micro-phototransistors were measured in Figure 4b,c. The statistics of the reaction time from 20 MoS2 phototransistors are shown in Figure S5.
The response time range is less than 200 ms, as shown in Figure 4b,c. The uncontrollable device fabrication process generates volatility in the MoS2 phototransistor’s reaction time. The different channel areas, thickness deviations, contamination of the device surface, and device contact resistance cause several phenomena that impair the performance of the devices. To perform consistently, the MoS2 phototransistors need to improve the contacts by reducing the contact resistance to create a smooth uniform channel area and thickness. To improve the performance of MoS2 phototransistors, it is necessary to reduce the contact resistance and create a smooth and uniform channel area and thickness. However, the development of the heterostructure formed by 2D materials and organic molecules is highly challenging, given these limitations. To overcome these challenges, we developed hetero junction phototransistors exhibiting a fast response time. This significant improvement demonstrates that overcoming the limitations that have been highlighted will significantly enhance the performance of the unique 2D materials and organic phototransistors.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we showed a heterojunction device as a planar phototransistor with a quick response mode that can be used in several ways. By efficiently constructing van der Waals interfaces with organic VOPc molecules, the MoS2 phototransistor exhibited a three-order of magnitude improvement of the photo response dynamics compared to the reported work in Table S1 [35,51,54,55,56]. Our 2D/organic heterojunction phototransistor will enable the production of high-performance versatile devices. As a result, the method has the potential to produce detectors with quick response times needed for practical applications. The work proves the successful application of TMD/organic heterojunction materials for improvements in the optoelectronic capabilities of 2D TMDs for photodetection.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13091491/s1, Figure S1: (a) Absorption spectra of ML MoS2. (b) Transmittance spectra of ML MoS2.; Figure S2: (a) Power intensity-dependent photocurrent measurements. (b) Measurement Setup of the phototransistor; Figure S3: Schematic diagram of the device fabrication process and optical images (a) Schematic diagram of MoS2 device fabrication process with all steps, see Figure S3. (b) Optical image of device Cr/Au electrodes, see Figure S3. (c) Optical image of MoS2 with Cr/Au electrodes, see Figure S3. (d) Optical image of MoS2 device; Figure S4: (a) Carrier densities of Pristine (P) MoS2 and VOPc/MoS2 heterojunction (H) phototransistor devices in dark and light conditions. (b) Mobilities and the threshold voltages [47] of the Pristine (P) MoS2 and the VOPc/MoS2 heterojunction (H) phototransistor devices in dark and light conditions; Figure S5: Statistics data of phototransistors (a) Statistics data of photo rise time from 20 MoS2 phototransistors. (b) Statistics data of photo decay time from 20 MoS2 phototransistors; Table S1: State of Art of the response time of VOPc/MoS2 heterojunction phototransistor. Refs. [35,43,51,54,55,56] are cited in supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A. and F.Z.; Methodology, S.A.; Validation, S.A.; Formal analysis, S.A.; Investigation, S.A., X.W., H.D., S.V., C.N.S. and L.M.; Writing—original draft, S.A. and F.Z.; Writing—review & editing, X.W., H.D., S.V., C.N.S., L.M. and O.G.S.; Supervision, F.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Paul Plocica for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Radisavljevic, B.; Radenovic, A.; Brivio, J.; Giacometti, V.; Kis, A. Single-Layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 147−150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, E.; Wang, W.; Zhang, C.; Jin, Y.; Zhu, G.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, D.W.; Zhou, P.; Xiu, F. Tunable Charge-trap Memory Based on Few layers MoS2. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 612−619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Geim, K.A.; Grigorieva, I.V. Van der Waals Heterostructure. Nature 2013, 499, 419−425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, Q.H.; Zadeh, K.K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J.N.; Strano, M.S. Electronics and Optoelectronics of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699−712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, C.; Guo, J.; Yu, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Li, H.; Shi, Y.; Dai, D. Silicon/2D-material photodetectors: From near-infrared to mid-infrared. Light Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Splendiani, A.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Kim, J.; Chim, C.-Y.; Galli, G.; Wang, F. Emerging Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1271−1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiang, J.; Guo, J.; Wan, X.; Yang, Y.; Xie, H.; Niu, D.; Yang, J.; He, J.; Gao, Y.; Wan, Q. 2D MoS2 Neuromorphic Devices for Brain-Like Computational Systems. Small 2017, 13, 1700933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sing, K.A.; Andleeb, S.; Sing, J.; Dung, H.T.; Seo, Y.; Eom, J. Ultraviolet-Light-Induced Reversible and Stable Carrier Modulation in MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 7125–7132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, P.F.; Yang, S.; Zhang, B.; Yang, H.G. Defect-Rich Ultrathin Cobalt–Iron Layered Double Hydroxide for Electrochemical Overall Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 50, 34699–35705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sing, K.A.; Rajiv, K.P.; Prakash, R.; Eom, J. Tailoring the charge carrier in few layers MoS2 field-effect transistors by Au metal adsorbate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 437, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, Y.-H.; Zhang, X.-Q.; Zhang, W.; Chang, M.-T.; Lin, C.-T.; Chang, K.-D.; Yu, Y.-C.; Wang, J.T.-W.; Chang, C.-S.; Li, L.-J.; et al. Synthesis of Large-Area MoS2 Atomic Layers with Chemical Vapor Deposition. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2320−2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lopez-Sanchez, O.; Lembke, D.; Kayci, M.; Radenovic, A.; Kis, A. Ultrasensitive Photodetectors Based on Monolayer MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 497−501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kufer, D.; Konstantatos, G. Photo-FETs: Phototransistors Enabled by 2D and 0D Nanomaterials. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 2197−2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Salvatore, G.A.; Muenzenrieder, N.; Barraud, C.; Petti, L.; Zysset, C.; Büthe, L.; Ensslin, K.; Tröster, G. Fabrication and Transfer of Flexible Few-Layers MoS2 Thin Film Transistors to Any Arbitrary Substrate. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 8809−8815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, S.Y.; Kim, U.J.; Chung, J.G.; Nam, H.; Jeong, H.Y.; Han, G.H.; Kim, H.; Oh, H.M.; Lee, H.; Kim, H.; et al. Large Work Function Modulation of Monolayer MoS2 by Ambient Gases. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 6100−6107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mouri, S.; Miyauchi, Y.; Matsuda, K. Tunable Photoluminescence of Monolayer MoS2 via Chemical Doping. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5944−5948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mak, K.F.; He, K.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.H.; Hone, J.; Heinz, T.F.; Shan, J. Tightly Bound Trions in Monolayer MoS2. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 207−211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Long, M.; Liu, E.; Wang, P.; Gao, A.; Xia, H.; Luo, W.; Wang, B.; Zeng, J.; Fu, Y.; Xu, K.; et al. Broadband Photovoltaic Detectors Based on an Atomically Thin Heterostructure. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2254−2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, Y.; Yang, J.; Lee, D.; Kim, Y.-H.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, H.; Cho, J.H. Trap-Induced Photoresponse of Solution-Synthesized MoS2. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 9193−9200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhou, N.; Xu, B.; Gan, L.; Zhang, J.; Han, J.; Zhai, T. Narrow band Spectrally Selective Near-Infrared Photodetector Based on Up-Conversion Nanoparticles Used in 2D Hybrid Device. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 1591−1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dolui, K.; Rungger, I.; Sanvito, S. Origin of the N-type and P-type Conductivity of MoS2 Monolayers on a SiO2 Substrate. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 165402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Forster, A.; Gemming, S.; Seifert, G.; Tománek, D. Chemical and Electronic Repair Mechanism of Defects in MoS2 Monolayers. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9989−9996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nguyen, E.P.; Carey, B.J.; Harrison, C.J.; Atkin, P.; Berean, J.K.; Gaspera, E.D.; Ou, J.Z.; Kaner, R.B.; Kalantar-zadeh, K.; Daeneke, T. Excitation Dependent Bidirectional Electron Transfer in Phthalocyanine-Functionalised MoS2 Nanosheets. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 16276−16283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Choi, J.; Zhang, H.; Choi, J.H. Modulating Optoelectronic Properties of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Semiconductors by Photo induced Charge Transfer. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 1671−1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pak, J.; Jang, J.; Cho, K.; Kim, T.-Y.; Song, Y.; Hong, W.-K.; Min, M.; Lee, H.; Lee, T. Enhancement of Photodetection Characteristics of MoS2 Field Effect Transistors Using Surface Treatment with Copper Phthalocyanine. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 18780−18788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kafle, R.T.; Kattel, B.; Lane, D.S.; Wang, T.; Zhao, H.; Chan, W.-L. Charge Transfer Exciton and Spin Flipping at Organic Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Interfaces. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 10184−10192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Park, J.H.; Sanne, A.; Guo, Y.; Amani, Z.K.; Movva, H.C.; Robinson, J.A.; Javey, A.; Robertson, J.; Banerjee, S.K.; Kummel, C.A. Defect Passivation of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides via a Charge Transfer Van der Waals. Int. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, 1701661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fang, S.; Kohama, K.; Hoshi, H.; Maruyama, Y. Spectral dependence of the anisotrophy of the X3 of epitaxially grown vanadyl phthalocyanine film. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 234, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, P.; Xia, Z.; Zou, Y.H.; Qiu, L.; Shen, J.; Shen, Y.; Xu, H. Femtosecond time-resolved optical response of phthalocyanine Langmuir-Blodgett film. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 75, 4648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marcel, P.; Dimitrievska, M.; Izquierdo-Roca, V.; Fontané, X.; Castellanos-Gomez, A.; Pérez-Tomás, A.; Mestres, N.; Espindola-Rodriguez, M.; López-Marino, S.; Neuschitzer, M.; et al. Multi wavelength excitation Raman Scattering Analysis of bulk and 2 dimensional MoS2: Vibrational properties of atomically thin MoS2 layers. 2D Mater. 2015, 2, 035006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wieting, T.J.; Verble, J.L. Infrared and Raman studies of long-wavelength optical phonons in hexagonal MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 1971, 3, 4286–4292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kong, K.; Obaidulla, M.S.; Habib, R.; Wang, Z.; Wang, R.; Khan, Y.; Zhu, H.; Xu, M.; Yang, D. Interlayer exciton emission in a MoS2/VOPcinogaic/organic van der Waals heterostructure. Mater. Horiz. 2022, 9, 1253–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kafle, T.; Kattel, B.; Yao, P.; Zereshki, P.; Zhao, H.; Chan, W.-L. Effect of the Interfacial Energy Landscape on Photoinduced Charge Generation at the ZnPc/MoS2 Interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 11328−11336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tan, W.-C.; Shih, W.-H.; Chen, Y.F. A Highly Sensitive Graphene-Organic Hybrid Photodetector with a Piezoelectric Substrate. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 6818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, Y.; Zhuge, F.; Hou, J.; Lv, L.; Luo, P.; Zhou, N.; Gan, L.; Zhai, T. Van der Waals Coupled Organic Molecules with Monolayer MoS2 for Fast Response Photodetectors with Gate-Tunable Responsivity. ACS Nano. 2018, 12, 4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ramadan, J.A.; Rochford, A.L.; Moffat, J.; Chris, M.; Ryan, P.M.; Jones, S.T.; Heutz, S. The morphology and structure of vanadyl phthalocyanine thin films on lithium niobate single crystals. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiao, T.L.; Yan, H.X.; Biao, L.; Tim, S.J.; Mei, F.; Liang, J.Y. Thin-film growth behavior of non-planar vanadium oxide phthalocyanine. Chin. Phys. B 2019, 28, 088101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baker, A.M.; Gilmore, R.; Lenardi, C.; Gissler, W. XPS Investigation of Preferential Sputtering of S from MoS2 and Determination of MoSx Stoichiometry from Mo and S Peak Positions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1999, 150, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, Q.; Odenthal, M.P.; Man, J.; Le, D.; Wang, S.C.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, T.; Sun, D.; Yamaguchi, K.; Tran, T.; et al. Controlled Argon Beam-Induced Desulfurization of Monolayer Molybdenum Disulfide. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2013, 25, 252201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schwinn, M.C.; Rafiq, S.; Lee, C.; Bland, P.M.; Song, W.T.; Sangwan, K.V.; Hersam, C.M.; Chen, X.L. Charge transfer dynamics and interlayer exciton formation in MoS2/VOPc mixed dimensional heterojunction. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 184701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, L.Y.; Kang, J.-K.; Kwak, K.; Ahn, J.; Choi, T.H.; Ju, B.-K.; Shokouh, H.S.; Im, S.; Park, M.-C.; Hwang, D.K. High-Performance 2D MoS2 Phototransistor for Photo Logic Gate and Image Sensor. ACS Photonics 2018, 12, 4745–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, W.; Huang, J.-K.; Chen, C.-H.; Chang, Y.-H.; Cheng, Y.-J.; Li, L.-J. High-Gain Phototransistors Based on a CVD MoS2 Monolayer. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3456−3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, H.-M.; Lee, D.-Y.; Choi, S.M.; Qu, D.; Liu, X.; Ra, C.-H.; Yoo, J.W. Metal-Semiconductor Barrier Modulation for High Photoresponse in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Field Effect Transistors. Sci. Rep. 2015, 4, 4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ayari, A.; Cobas, E.; Ogundadegbe, O.; Fuhrer, S.M. Realization and electrical characterization of ultrathin crystals of layered transition-metal dichalcogenides. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 014507−014511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Das, S.; Chen, H.-Y.; Penumatcha, V.A.; Appenzeller, J. High Performance Multilayer MoS2 Transistors with Scandium Contact. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 100−105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Song, B.; Gu, H.; Fang, M.; Ho, Y.-T.; Chen, X.; Jiang, H.; Liu, S. Complex Optical Conductivity of Two-Dimensional MoS2: A Striking Layer Dependency. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 6246–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Andleeb, S.; Eom, J.; Naz, R.N.; Singh, K.A. MoS2 field-effect transistor with graphene contacts. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2017, 5, 8308–8314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fang, H.; Hu, W. Photogating in Low Dimensional Photodetectors. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1700323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, H.; Zhang, C.; Rana, F. Ultrafast Dynamics of Defect Assisted Electron-Hole Recombination in Monolayer. MoS2. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 339−345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Furchi, M.M.; Polyushkin, K.D.; Pospischil, A.; Mueller, T. Mechanisms of Photoconductivity in Atomically Thin MoS2. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6165−6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jinsu, P.; Min, M.; Cho, K.; Lien, D.-H.; Ahn, H.G.; Jang, J.; Yoo, D.; Chung, S.; Javey, A.; Lee, T. Improved photo switching response times of MoS2 field-effect transistors by stacking p-type copper phthalocyanine layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 183502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kang, D.-H.; Kim, M.-S.; Shim, J.; Jeon, J.; Park, H.-Y.; Jung, W.-S.; Yu, H.-Y.; Pang, C.-H.; Lee, S.; Park, J.-H. High-Performance Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Photodetectors Enhanced by Self Assembled Monolayer Doping. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 4219−4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, N.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, X. Photocatalytic Applications of ReS2-Based Heterostructures. Molecules 2023, 28, 2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dang, Q.V.; Han, G.-S.; Trung, Q.T.; Duty, T.L.; Jin, Y.-U.; Hwang, B.-U.; Jung, H.-S.; Lee, N.-E. Methylammonium lead iodide perovskite-graphene hybrid channels in flexible broadband phototransistors. Carbon 2016, 105, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, X.; Luo, X.; Nan, H.; Guo, H.; Wang, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, M.; Yang, Z.; Shi, Y.; Hu, W.; et al. Epitaxial Ultrathin Organic Crystals on Graphene for High-Efficiency Phototransistors. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 5200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, B.Y.; Kwon, J.; Hwang, E.; Ra, C.-H.; Yoo, J.W.; Ahn, J.-H.; Park, J.H. High-Performance Perovskite–Graphene Hybrid Photodetector. Adv. Mater. 2014, 27, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fabrication of micro-phototransistor. (a) Optical image of a fabricated MoS2 phototransistor. (b) Schematic diagrams of pristine (top) and MoS2/VOPc (bottom) heterojunction phototransistors. (c) Raman spectra of the ML MoS2 phototransistor. (d) Charge transfer mechanism at the interface of MoS2 and VOPc. (e) AFM image and corresponding cross-section profile of the MoS2 device. (f) Morphology of VOPc organic molecule.
Figure 1. Fabrication of micro-phototransistor. (a) Optical image of a fabricated MoS2 phototransistor. (b) Schematic diagrams of pristine (top) and MoS2/VOPc (bottom) heterojunction phototransistors. (c) Raman spectra of the ML MoS2 phototransistor. (d) Charge transfer mechanism at the interface of MoS2 and VOPc. (e) AFM image and corresponding cross-section profile of the MoS2 device. (f) Morphology of VOPc organic molecule.
Nanomaterials 13 01491 g001
Figure 2. Electric and photo measurements of micro-phototransistor. (a) Combined transfer curves of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor. (b) Combined responsivity of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor. (c,e) Photoresponse rise time of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor, respectively. (d,f) Photoresponse decay time of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor, respectively.
Figure 2. Electric and photo measurements of micro-phototransistor. (a) Combined transfer curves of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor. (b) Combined responsivity of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor. (c,e) Photoresponse rise time of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor, respectively. (d,f) Photoresponse decay time of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor, respectively.
Nanomaterials 13 01491 g002
Figure 3. Photoresponse phenomenon and energy band diagram of micro-phototransistor. (a) Phenomenon of the light at the interface of pristine MoS2 (panels (I, II, III)) and VOPc/MoS2 (panels (IV, V, VI)) heterojunction phototransistor. Panels (I, IV) in dark state, panels (II, V) in exposure state, and panels (III, VI) in recovery state. (b) Energy band diagram of Si substrate, MoS2, and VOPc molecules. (c) Generation of holes by applying the positive gate bias in VOPc/MoS2 heterojunction phototransistor.
Figure 3. Photoresponse phenomenon and energy band diagram of micro-phototransistor. (a) Phenomenon of the light at the interface of pristine MoS2 (panels (I, II, III)) and VOPc/MoS2 (panels (IV, V, VI)) heterojunction phototransistor. Panels (I, IV) in dark state, panels (II, V) in exposure state, and panels (III, VI) in recovery state. (b) Energy band diagram of Si substrate, MoS2, and VOPc molecules. (c) Generation of holes by applying the positive gate bias in VOPc/MoS2 heterojunction phototransistor.
Nanomaterials 13 01491 g003
Figure 4. Photo responsivity and response time of micro-phototransistor. (a) Power intensity-dependent responsivity of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor. (b) The photo rise time of three pristine MoS2 and VOPc/MoS2 heterojunction phototransistor devices. (c) The photo decay time of three pristine MoS2 and VOPc/MoS2 heterojunction phototransistor devices.
Figure 4. Photo responsivity and response time of micro-phototransistor. (a) Power intensity-dependent responsivity of pristine MoS2 and MoS2/VOPcheterojunction phototransistor. (b) The photo rise time of three pristine MoS2 and VOPc/MoS2 heterojunction phototransistor devices. (c) The photo decay time of three pristine MoS2 and VOPc/MoS2 heterojunction phototransistor devices.
Nanomaterials 13 01491 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andleeb, S.; Wang, X.; Dong, H.; Valligatla, S.; Saggau, C.N.; Ma, L.; Schmidt, O.G.; Zhu, F. Fast-Response Micro-Phototransistor Based on MoS2/Organic Molecule Heterojunction. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13091491

AMA Style

Andleeb S, Wang X, Dong H, Valligatla S, Saggau CN, Ma L, Schmidt OG, Zhu F. Fast-Response Micro-Phototransistor Based on MoS2/Organic Molecule Heterojunction. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(9):1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13091491

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andleeb, Shaista, Xiaoyu Wang, Haiyun Dong, Sreeramulu Valligatla, Christian Niclaas Saggau, Libo Ma, Oliver G. Schmidt, and Feng Zhu. 2023. "Fast-Response Micro-Phototransistor Based on MoS2/Organic Molecule Heterojunction" Nanomaterials 13, no. 9: 1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13091491

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop