Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Photocatalytic Properties of Anatase TiO2 with Hollow Hexagonal Frame Structure
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Fluorescent Properties of Multi-Functionalized C70 Derivatives of C70(OCH3)10[C(COOEt)2] and C70(OCH3)10[C(COOEt)2]2
Previous Article in Journal
Radiation-Induced Nucleation and Growth of CaSi2 Crystals, Both Directly during the Epitaxial CaF2 Growth and after the CaF2 Film Formation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diversity of Metal—Fullerene Framework Structures Regulated by Metal Salts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Photoelectrochemical Response Enhancement for Metallofullerene-[12]Cycloparaphenylene Supramolecular Complexes

1
College of Chemistry, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
2
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Key Laboratory of Molecular Nanostructure and Nanotechnology, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100190, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
School of Information, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China
5
Collaborative Innovation Center for Shanxi Advanced Permanent Magnetic Materials and Technology, Linfen 041004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(9), 1408; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091408
Submission received: 29 March 2022 / Revised: 14 April 2022 / Accepted: 16 April 2022 / Published: 20 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fullerene Nanostructures: Synthesis, Functionalities and Applications)

Abstract

:
The photoelectrochemical properties of three metallofullerene-[12]cycloparaphenylene ([12]CPP) supramolecular complexes of Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP were studied. It was revealed that the photocurrent responses of these supramolecular complexes show enhancement compared with those of pristine metallofullerenes, indicating the efficient photocurrent generation and promoted charge carrier transport caused by the supramolecular interaction. The results show that Sc2C2@C82 and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP have the strongest photocurrents. Then, by comparing the photocurrent intensities of the metallofullerene-biphenyl derivates mixture and the metallofullerene⊂[12]CPP complexes, it was demonstrated that the host–guest interaction is the key factor promoting photocurrent enhancement. At the same time, by observing the microscopic morphologies of pristine fullerenes and supramolecular complexes, it was found that the construction of supramolecules helps to improve the morphology of metallofullerenes on FTO glass. Additionally, their electrical conductivity in optoelectronic devices was tested, respectively, indicating that the construction of supramolecules facilitates the transport of charge carriers. This work discloses the potential application of metallofullerene supramolecular complexes as photodetector and photoelectronic materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Endohedral metallofullerenes have attracted great interest from scientists due to their special applications in semiconductors and electronic devices with respect to their combining characters from fullerene cage and internal metal cluster [1,2]. Because of the electron transfer from endohedral metal atoms to outer fullerene cage, the electronic properties of metallofullerenes are changed drastically from those of empty fullerenes [3,4]. Metallofullerenes have varied HOMO–LUMO gaps and unique photochemical properties [5,6]; therefore, metallofullerenes are potential nanomaterials with wide application in field-effect transistors [7], photodetectors [8], photovoltaic devices [9], etc. For example, Kobayashi et al. reported bimetal endohedral fullerene La2@C80 thin film as n-type field effect transistor [10]. Moreover, in 2017, Lu’s group discovered that Lu2@C82 nanorods have enhanced photoluminescence and optoelectronic properties [11]. It should be noted that the electronic properties of metallofullerenes need to be improved due to the spherical form, which would influence carrier mobility.
Host–guest supramolecular construction is an effective method for modulating the state and properties of metallofullerenes, as there are strong π–π interaction between them [12]. For host molecules, functional macrocyclic molecules have always played a very important role in the field of supramolecular chemistry [13]. Compared with other host molecules, the cycloparaphenylene (CPP) carbon nanorings are very suitable for metallofullerenes, as their supramolecular structures have high stability [14]. For example, our group has studied the paramagnetic properties of C80-based metallofullerenes within [12]CPP, revealing the confinement effect on the metallofullerene spin modulation [15]. In 2019, Delius et al. successfully carried out the synthesis of a porphyrin–[10]CPP conjugate and studied its strong association with a range of fullerenes and demonstrated that [10]CPP as a supramolecular junction enables efficient charge transport between a porphyrin electron donor and unmodified fullerene electron acceptors [16]. These results, together with Yamago’s recent report on the thin-film conductivity of [10]CPP and its alkoxy derivatives [17], imply that supramolecular complexes of [10]CPP and fullerenes may be a useful addition to the toolbox of organic electronics. In addition, Yang et al. studied present syntheses and characterizations of two novels CPP-like curved nanographene that strongly bind with fullerene C60 to form photoconductive heterojunctions [18]. The results indicate that there is a fast photoinduced electron transfer process in the supramolecular heterojunction. Recently, Zhao et al. constructed a double-walled carbon nanoring supramolecular [6]CPP-[12]CPP by self-assembly and found that [6]CPP⊂[12]CPP shows highly enhanced photoconductivity and photocurrent under light irradiation compared with those of pristine monomers [19]. However, the optoelectronic property of metallofullerenes within the [12]CPP supramolecular complex has not been studied. Considering that the type of supramolecular system may change the molecular energy levels [20], control the metallofullerene assembly [17], and consequently influence the carrier mobility [8,18], therefore, it is significant to explore the optoelectronic property of this new kind of supramolecular complex.
In this paper, Sc3N@C78, Sc3N@C80, and Sc2C2@C82 were selected to study the photoelectrochemical property of their metallofullerene-[12]CPP supramolecular complexes. The metallofullerene-[12]CPP film was prepared by spin coating on fluorine-doped tin dioxide (FTO) glass as the working electrode, and the photoconductive measurement was performed on an electrochemical system. The photocurrent responses of these supramolecular complexes were compared.

2. Materials and Methods

Metallofullerene Sc3N@C78, Sc3N@C80 were synthesized by arc-discharge method. First, the graphite powder and graphite rod were vacuum-dried at 100 °C for 12 h, and then the graphite powder and Sc/Ni alloy were mixed uniformly in a mass ratio of 1:3 and filled into hollow graphite rods. The graphite rods were then placed in a VD-250 vacuum arc furnace and energized by arc discharge under a pressure of 180 Torr He and 20 Torr N2. The ashes obtained after cooling were Soxhlet extracted with toluene solvent for 24 h to obtain a toluene solution of fullerenes. The synthesis method of Sc2C2@C82 is similar to that of Sc3N@C78 and Sc3N@C80; the difference is that 200 torr He needs to be added when adding gas, and N2 is not required. Then, pure metallofullerenes were isolated and purified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The [12]CPP, biphenyl, p−terphenyl, and p−quaterphenyl was purchased from J&K.
Metallofullerene solution with a concentration of 4 × 10−5 M was prepared in o-DCB solution. The complexes of Sc3N@C78, Sc3N@C80, and Sc2C2@C82 with [12]CPP were mixed with a 1:1 mole ratio. For the film preparation of metallofullerene complex, 10 μL sample was dropped to the FTO glass, and the spin-coating was carried out with a spin-speed of 1800 rpm for 50 s.
UV–vis absorption spectra were acquired from a HITACHI UV/VIS/NIR Spectrometer UH4150.
Fluorescence quenching experiments were recorded on a fluorescence spectrometer (F-7100, HITACHI) with excitation at 350 nm in toluene solution. Method: To toluene solution of (4.0 × 10−7 M, 2 mL) [12]CPP was added 20 μL of metallofullerene samples (4.0 × 10−5 M).
AFM experiments were performed using a Multimode VIII atomic force microscopy (Bruker Inc., Billerica, MA, USA). SEM is a module that comes with the AFM device. The measurements are under room temperature and atmospheric pressure.
We prepared 100 μL (4 × 10−3 M) samples of Sc2C2@C82 and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP, respectively. FTO substrates were cleaned ultrasonically several times in sequence baths of acetone, ethyl alcohol, and deionized water for 20 min. The solution was quickly spin-coated on an FTO glass electrode (100 μL, 1800 rpm min−1) and aged for 50 s at the temperature of 80 °C. The model of the spin coater is WS-650MZ-23NPPB, manufactured by Laurell Technologies. The photocurrent measurement was carried out using the CHI650E electrochemical workstation. The device of FTO Sc2C2@C82 and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP was conducted to measure the I–V curve by the ORIEL IQE-200 system with an AM 1.5 solar spectrum filter and a Keithley 2420 source meter.
Geometry optimization and excitation states were all calculated at the level of B3LYP/6-31G* and realized by DFT. The Gaussian 16 (A.03) program package was employed for all quantum chemistry calculations.

3. Results and Discussion

Firstly, we synthesized Sc3N@C78-D5h, Sc3N@C80-Ih, and Sc2C2@C82-Cs synthesized by the arc-discharge method and isolated by HPLC. Metallofullerene and [12]CPP mildly were mixed with 1:1 mole ratio at room temperature to obtain the supramolecular complexes of Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP. Figure 1 shows the theoretically optimized structure of these complexes. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry demonstrated stable formation of the three complexes [21,22,23]. In Figure S1a, the mass peak of 1998 represents the molecular ion peak of Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, and the mass peak of 1085 corresponds to the fragments of Sc3N@C78. In Figure S1b, the mass peak of 2022 represents the molecular ion peak of Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and the mass peak of 1109 corresponds to the fragments of Sc3N@C80. In addition, in Figure S1c, the mass peak of 2011 represents the molecular ion peak of Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP, and the mass peak of 1098 corresponds to the fragments of Sc2C2@C82. Subsequently, we performed UV-near infrared visible (UV-Vis) characterization of Sc3N@C78, Sc3N@C80, and Sc2C2@C82 and their respective complexes with [12]CPP (Figure S2).
The film was firstly prepared by spin coating on FTO glass as the working electrode (Scheme 1), then the photoelectrochemical experiments of the three pristine metallofullerenes were carried out.
It can be seen from Figure 2a that the metallofullerenes with the same molar concentration were irradiated by natural light for 20 s every 20 s by the 1 V bias voltage, and it was found that the corresponding responses were generated. It can be clearly seen that immediately after irradiation, a stable anode photocurrent was generated and decreased without irradiation. These processes can be repeated reversibly multiple times, which indicate that surface active film is sufficiently stable during light exposure. The light response intensity of Sc2C2@C82 was the highest at about 0.2 μA (Figure 2b), and those of Sc3N@C78 and Sc3N@C80 were around 0.1 μA, see Figure 2a, revealing the metallofullerene-dependent photoconductive property [3,24]. These results show the high light absorption ability of Sc2C2@C82, as revealed in its absorption of the UV-Vis-NIR spectrum (Figure S3). It can be seen that Sc2C2@C82 still has an absorption peak at a wavelength of 1200 nm, indicating that Sc2C2@C82 can produce energy-level transitions under low-energy illumination.
Then, the photoelectrochemical experiments of three metallofullerenes-[12]CPP complexes were studied, as shown in Figure 2b. The results show that the photocurrent responses of the metallofullerenes-[12]CPP complexes show an enhancement as compared with pristine metallofullerenes, indicating the efficient photocurrent generation and promoted charge carrier transport processes caused by the host–guest interaction. Notably, the Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP still had the strongest light response intensity (0.32 μA) compared to those of Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP and Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP. Different fullerenes and CPPs have different host–guest interactions, which may be one of the reasons for this difference [20].
The HOMO–LUMO energy gaps of metallofullerene Sc3N@C78 (2.269 eV), Sc3N@C80 (2.529 eV), Sc2C2@C82 (1.394 eV) (Figure 3a) and complex Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP (2.273 eV), Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP (2.538 eV), and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP (1.406 eV) (Figure 3b) were calculated from the edges of their absorption bands (Figure 3). The HOMO–LUMO energy gap is often used to predict the electrical conductivity of a molecule [25]. It is generally considered that the smaller the HOMO–LUMO gap, the better the electrical conductivity. It can be seen that the pristine Sc2C2@C82 and complex Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP have the smallest gap, respectively, indicating that they have the best electrical conductivity and thus the strongest photocurrent. Additionally, we note that the difference in the gap between fullerenes and complexes is not significant. The molecular orbitals were little affected for metallofullerene and CPP upon complexation. The calculation results indicate that no significant orbital interactions took place between fullerene and [12]CPP.
It is worth noting that our previous study found that the host–guest interactions between different carbon cages and CPP were different [19]. It was found by calculation that the binding energy of Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP was the strongest at about –48.37 Kcal·mol−1 (Table S1). Therefore, we have reason to believe that the difference in this interaction is one of the factors affecting the photocurrent signal.
[12]CPP has excellent fluorescence properties, and fullerenes with different sizes have different quenching abilities than [12]CPP [23]. We used these three metallofullerenes with the same concentration to quench the fluorescence of [12]CPP and obtained different fluorescence quenching efficiencies; see Figure 4. After comparison, it can be seen that Sc2C2@C82 has the best quenching effect on [12]CPP—about 57.7%. Combined with the conclusions given in the literature [23], it shows that Sc2C2@C82 has stronger host–guest interaction with [12]CPP and that this π-conjugated host–guest interaction enhanced action helps to facilitate charge carrier transfer, resulting in improved photocurrent signal [18].
In addition, we compared the photoconductive properties of Sc3N@C78, Sc3N@C80, and Sc2C2@C82 complexed with biphenyl, p−terphenyl, p−quaterphenyl, and [12]CPP to further disclose the effect of the host–guest interaction on the photocurrent response, as shown in Figure 5. The metallofullerenes maintain the same molar concentration for all of the photoelectrochemical experiments. The small aromatic molecules were mixed with three metallofullerene solutions at certain concentration to ensure that they had the same number of benzene rings with [12]CPP. Firstly, the photoconductive properties of the pristine biphenyl, p−terphenyl, and p−quaterphenyl were measured (Figure S5). The photocurrent responses of the three small aromatic molecules were similar. Subsequently, after comparing the metallofullerenes complexed with three small aromatic molecules and [12]CPP, it was found that the small aromatic molecules did not increase the photocurrent intensity of metallofullerenes, but the photocurrent responses of the supramolecular complexes with [12]CPP became stronger. At the same time, we characterized the UV-Vis of these biphenyls molecules and metallofullerene mixtures, and it can also be seen that the simple mixture of biphenyls and metallofullerene had not conjugated each other, as shown in Figure S6. These results further reveal that biphenyl derivatives have little effect on the photocurrent of fullerenes and that the host–guest interaction after the recombination of fullerenes and [12]CPP is the main factor for the improvement in the photocurrent response of fullerenes.
In the above experiments, the light was switched on and off six times for about 240 s, and the photocurrent was tested. It can be seen that the photocurrent signal was stable, so the FTO film had sufficient stability [19]. In detail, the surface of the metallofullerene complex films were characterized by SEM and AFM. Figure 6 shows that the film depth values of Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP were about −79 to 62.3 nm, −80.1 to 62.3 nm, and −81.3 to 62.8 nm, respectively. The three supramolecular complex films exhibited uniform and flat surfaces. It should be noted that the surfaces of the pristine metallofullerenes have obvious aggregation (Figure S4). Therefore, the host of [12]CPP can improve the metallofullerene assembly on the FTO glass surface, and then enhance the carrier mobility of supramolecular complexes. In recent years, Wan’s team has achieved microscale superlubricity of fullerene derivatives by constructing regular host–guest assembly structures, proving that the construction of host–guests can help reduce the friction coefficient of fullerenes and improve the nanomolecular planar morphology [26]. Similar results were also reported in the STM images of Y3N@C80⊂[12]CPP on Au(111) surface, in which the Y3N@C80⊂[12]CPP randomly absorb on the surface without aggregation, as the [12]CPP nanoring can change the weak van der Waals forces and influence the self-assembly character of Y3N@C80 [15].
The supramolecular formation will change the metallofullerene assembly on the FTO glass surface, and then enhance the carrier mobility of supramolecular complexes. The I–V measurements for Sc2C2@C80, Sc2C2@C80@[12]CPP, and Sc2C2@C80-biphenyl derivatives mixture were then conducted. A device with a structure of FTO/samples/Ag was designed to measure the I–V curves with a standard xenon-lamp-based solar simulator [19]. As shown in Figure 7, a strong linear relationship between the current and the applied voltage ranging from −1 V to 1 V was recorded, indicating an ohmic behavior of the electrical conduction. By comparing the line slopes, it can be seen that the Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP has a greater conductivity than the pristine Sc2C2@C82 and Sc2C2@C82-biphenyl derivatives mixtures. The shape and functional group complementarity between two electronic components form a robust host–guest complex that can be readily processed to generate a superior electronic material. This indicates that electronic communication between aromatic surfaces is particularly strong due to their tight supramolecular assembly [27]. There are many reports in the literature on the enhancement of the photocurrent performance of materials by improving the structure of thin films. Suppressing the impurity scattering associated with the structural disorder therefore increased the carrier mobility, which led to the significant increase in photocurrent observed in the photodetector [28,29,30]. Therefore, it is plausible that this improved the planar self-assembly behavior of the material by constructing supramolecules to influence the photocurrent of the material. This suggests their potential application in the field of photodetectors and optoelectronic devices.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the photoelectrochemical property of three metallofullerene⊂[12]CPP supramolecular complexes of Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP were studied. The results show that the photocurrent responses of the metallofullerenes-[12]CPP complexes show an enhancement as compared with pristine metallofullerenes due to the supramolecular interaction. In addition, the metallofullerene and benzene series mixtures were also comparatively investigated to illustrate the promoting effect of host–guest interaction on the photocurrent generation in metallofullerene. Through a micro-morphological characterization, it can be seen that the formation of supramolecules on the FTO glass improves the assembly morphology of the fullerene and that the I–V curve test proves that the composite has stronger electrical conductivity. These results indicate the efficient photocurrent generation and promoted charge carrier transport processes by the supramolecular structure. Consequently, this host–guest effect promotes the photocurrent responses of the metallofullerenes supramolecular complexes, illustrating their potential application in photodetector and photoelectronic devices.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12091408/s1, Figure S1: Corresponding MALDI-TOF mass spectra of prepared (a) Sc3N@C78@[12]CPP, (b) Sc3N@C80@[12]CPP, and (c) Sc2C2@C82@[12]CPP, respectively, Figure S2: UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra of (a) Sc3N@C78 and Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, (b) Sc3N@C80 and Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and (c) Sc2C2@C82 and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP, respectively, Figure S3: UV-vis-NIR absorption spectra of (a) Sc3N@C78, (b) Sc3N@C80, and (c) Sc2C2@C82, respectively. The insets show the enlarged spectra around onset wavelength, Figure S4: SEM image of Sc2C2@C82, Figure S5: Photocurrent response intensity of metallofullerenes, biphenyl, p−terphenyl, p−quaterphenyl, and [12]CPP on FTO glass, Figure S6: UV-Vis-NIR spectra of (a)Sc3N@C78, (b) Sc3N@C80, and (c) Sc2C2@C82 with biphenyl, p−terphenyl, p−quaterphenyl, and [12]CPP, respectively, Table S1: The optimized energies of complex EMFs⊂[12]CPP, EMFs, and [12]CPP. Reference [31] is cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. and P.C.; methodology, Z.Z. and Y.L.; software, F.W.; resources, Z.Z.; data curation, J.Z., L.Q. and L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.Z. and Z.Z.; supervision, P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21963004). P. Cui particularly thanks the Young scientific and technological talents growth project of Guizhou Provincial Department of Education (QJH-KY-2017-142). Z. Zhang thanks the Opening Project of PCOSS, Xiamen University (No. 201928) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No.201901D111109).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shinohara, H. Endohedral metallofullerenes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2000, 6, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lu, X.; Feng, L.; Akasaka, T.; Nagase, S. Current status and future developments of endohedral metallofullerenes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 23, 7723–7760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Yang, S.; Yang, S. Photoelectrochemistry of Langmuir−Blodgett Films of the Endohedral Metallofullerene Dy@C82 on ITO Electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 39, 9406–9412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, S.; Fan, L.; Yang, S. Significantly enhanced photocurrent efficiency of a poly (3-hexylthiophene) photoelectrochemical device by doping with the endohedral metallofullerene Dy@C82. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 4–6, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bikram, C.K.C.; Subbaiyan, N.K.; D’Souza, F. Supramolecular Donor–Acceptor Assembly Derived from Tetracarbazole–Zinc Phthalocyanine Coordinated to Fullerene: Design, Synthesis, Photochemical, and Photoelectrochemical Studies. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 22, 11964–11972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sandanayaka, A.S.; Murakami, T.; Hasobe, T. Preparation and photophysical and photoelectrochemical properties of supramolecular porphyrin nanorods structurally controlled by encapsulated fullerene derivatives. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 42, 18369–18378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, M.; Guan, R.; Yang, S. Hybrids of fullerenes and 2d nanomaterials. Adv. Sci. 2019, 1, 1800941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Santos, M.J.; Girotto, E.M.; Nogueira, A.F. Photoelectrochemical properties of poly (terthiophene) films modified with a fullerene derivative. Thin Solid Film. 2006, 4, 2644–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sato, S.; Seki, S.; Luo, G.; Suzuki, M.; Lu, J.; Nagase, S.; Akasaka, T. Tunable charge-transport properties of Ih-C80 endohedral metallofullerenes: Investigation of La2@C80, Sc3N@C80, and Sc3C2@C80. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 28, 11681–11686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kobayashi, S.-I.; Mori, S.; Iida, S.; Ando, H.; Takenobu, T.; Taguchi, Y.; Fujiwara, A.; Taninaka, A.; Shinohara, H.; Iwasa, Y. Conductivity and field effect transistor of La2@C80 metallofullerene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 27, 8116–8117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Shen, W.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, S.; Xie, Y.; Lu, X. Lu2@C82 Nanorods with Enhanced Photoluminescence and Photoelectrochemical Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 34, 28838–28843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Matsuoka, K.-I.; Akiyama, T.; Yamada, S. Step-by-Step Fabrication of Porphyrin−Fullerene Supramolecular Assemblies and Their Photoelectrochemical Properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 17, 7015–7020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ogoshi, T.; Ueshima, N.; Sakakibara, F.; Yamagishi, T.A.; Haino, T. Conversion from pillar[5]arene to pillar[6-15]arenes by ring expansion and encapsulation of C60 by pillar[n]arenes with nanosize cavities. Org. Lett. 2014, 11, 2896–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Iwamoto, T.; Slanina, Z.; Mizorogi, N.; Guo, J.; Akasaka, T.; Nagase, S.; Takaya, H.; Yasuda, N.; Kato, T.; Yamago, S. Partial charge transfer in the shortest possible metallofullerene peapod, La@C82⊂[11] cycloparaphenylene. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 44, 14403–14409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, C.; Meng, H.; Nie, M.; Wang, X.; Cai, Z.; Chen, T.; Wang, D.; Wang, C.; Wang, T. Supramolecular Complexes of C80-Based Metallofullerenes with [12]Cycloparaphenylene Nanoring and Altered Property in a Confined Space. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 19, 12514–12520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, Y.; Wang, B.; Kaur, R.; Minameyer, M.B.; Bothe, M.; Drewello, T.; Guldi, D.M.; von Delius, M. A Supramolecular [10]CPP Junction Enables Efficient Electron Transfer in Modular Porphyrin-[10]CPP supersetFullerene Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 36, 11549–11553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kayahara, E.; Sun, L.; Onishi, H.; Suzuki, K.; Fukushima, T.; Sawada, A.; Kaji, H.; Yamago, S. Gram-Scale Syntheses and Conductivities of [10]Cycloparaphenylene and Its Tetraalkoxy Derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 51, 18480–18483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Huang, Q.; Zhuang, G.; Jia, H.; Qian, M.; Cui, S.; Yang, S.; Du, P. Photoconductive Curved-Nanographene/Fullerene Supramolecular Heterojunctions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 19, 6244–6249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhao, C.; Liu, F.; Feng, L.; Nie, M.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, T. Construction of a double-walled carbon nanoring. Nanoscale 2021, 9, 4880–4886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Q.; Chen, X.; Hu, W.; Zhang, M.; Ding, L.; Wang, M.; Qiao, Q.; Yang, S. Beyond Metal Oxides: Introducing Low-Temperature Solution-Processed Ultrathin Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets into Polymer Solar Cells Toward Improved Electron Transport. Sol. RRL 2019, 2, 1970025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, R.; Zhang, L.; Xia, J.; Lu, X. Controllable Synthesis of Sc3N@C78 Microspindles with Excellent Electrophotonic Properties. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 1489–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, C.; Meng, H.; Nie, M.; Huang, Q.; Du, P.; Wang, C.; Wang, T. Construction of a short metallofullerene-peapod with a spin probe. Chem. Commun. 2019, 77, 11511–11514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, J.; Zhao, C.; Meng, H.; Nie, M.; Li, Q.; Xiang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.; Wang, T. Size-selective encapsulation of metallofullerenes by [12]Cycloparaphenylene and dissociation using metal-organic framework. Carbon 2020, 161, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fujii, A.; Umeda, T.; Shirakawa, T.; Akasaka, T.; Yoshino, K. Photocurrent Enhancement in Conducting Polymer Device by Doping with Endohedral Metallofullerene La@C82. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 41, 2254–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Manzetti, S.; Lu, T. Alternant conjugated oligomers with tunable and narrow HOMO–LUMO gaps as sustainable nanowires. RSC Adv. 2013, 48, 25881–25890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tan, S.; Shi, H.; Fu, L.; Ma, J.; Du, X.; Song, J.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Xu, H.; Wan, J. Superlubricity of Fullerene Derivatives Induced by Host–Guest Assembly. ACS Appl. Mater. 2020, 16, 18924–18933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Barendt, T.A.; Ball, M.L.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, B.; Fowler, B.; Schattman, A.; Ritter, V.C.; Steigerwald, M.L.; Nuckolls, C. Supramolecular Assemblies for Electronic Materials. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 3744–3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jia, M.; Wang, F.; Tang, L.; Xiang, J.; Teng, K.S.; Lau, S.P. High-Performance Deep Ultraviolet Photodetector Based on NiO/β-Ga2O3 Heterojunction. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020, 1, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, H.; Chen, P.; Yuan, S.; Huang, T.; Zhang, S.; Wuu, D. Improved Performance of Deep Ultraviolet Photodetector From Sputtered Ga2O3 Films Using Post-Thermal Treatments. IEEE Photon. J. 2019, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qian, L.X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.H.; Sheng, T.; Liu, X.Z. β-Ga2O3 solar-blind deep-ultraviolet photodetector based on annealed sapphire substrate. Vacuum 2017, 140, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hay, P.J.; Wadt, W.R. Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for K to Au including the outermost core orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Optimized structures of (a) Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, (b) Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and (c) Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP, respectively.
Figure 1. Optimized structures of (a) Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, (b) Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and (c) Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP, respectively.
Nanomaterials 12 01408 g001
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of supramolecular thin-film preparation and photocurrent measurement.
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of supramolecular thin-film preparation and photocurrent measurement.
Nanomaterials 12 01408 sch001
Figure 2. (a) Photocurrent responses of spin coating films of Sc3N@C78, Sc3N@C80, and Sc2C2@C82. (b) Photocurrent responses of spin coating films of Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP. Conditions: 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte solution under 1 V bias voltage.
Figure 2. (a) Photocurrent responses of spin coating films of Sc3N@C78, Sc3N@C80, and Sc2C2@C82. (b) Photocurrent responses of spin coating films of Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP. Conditions: 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte solution under 1 V bias voltage.
Nanomaterials 12 01408 g002
Figure 3. Molecular orbital diagrams for (a) Sc3N@C78, Sc3N@C80 and Sc2C2@C82; (b) Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP calculated at the B3LYP/6−31G* level of theory.
Figure 3. Molecular orbital diagrams for (a) Sc3N@C78, Sc3N@C80 and Sc2C2@C82; (b) Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP calculated at the B3LYP/6−31G* level of theory.
Nanomaterials 12 01408 g003
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra before and after the dropwise addition of (a) Sc3N@C78, (b) Sc3N@C80, and (c) Sc2C2@C82 to [12]CPP toluene solution at the same concentration. (d) Quenching efficiency of [12]CPP by three metallofullerenes at the same concentration.
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra before and after the dropwise addition of (a) Sc3N@C78, (b) Sc3N@C80, and (c) Sc2C2@C82 to [12]CPP toluene solution at the same concentration. (d) Quenching efficiency of [12]CPP by three metallofullerenes at the same concentration.
Nanomaterials 12 01408 g004
Figure 5. Photocurrent responses of (a) Sc3N@C78, (b) Sc3N@C80, and (c) Sc2C2@C82 complexed with biphenyl, p−terphenyl, p−quaterphenyl, and [12]CPP, respectively.
Figure 5. Photocurrent responses of (a) Sc3N@C78, (b) Sc3N@C80, and (c) Sc2C2@C82 complexed with biphenyl, p−terphenyl, p−quaterphenyl, and [12]CPP, respectively.
Nanomaterials 12 01408 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, (b) Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and (c) Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP complexes after spin coating on FTO glass, respectively. AFM images of (d) Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, (e) Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and (f) Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP complexes after spin coating on FTO glass, respectively.
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, (b) Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and (c) Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP complexes after spin coating on FTO glass, respectively. AFM images of (d) Sc3N@C78⊂[12]CPP, (e) Sc3N@C80⊂[12]CPP, and (f) Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP complexes after spin coating on FTO glass, respectively.
Nanomaterials 12 01408 g006
Figure 7. I–V profiles of Sc2C2@C82 (black), Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP (red), Sc2C2@C82&biphenyl (purple), Sc2C2@C82&p−terphenyl (blue), and Sc2C2@C82&p−quaterphenyl (green) with photoirradiation.
Figure 7. I–V profiles of Sc2C2@C82 (black), Sc2C2@C82⊂[12]CPP (red), Sc2C2@C82&biphenyl (purple), Sc2C2@C82&p−terphenyl (blue), and Sc2C2@C82&p−quaterphenyl (green) with photoirradiation.
Nanomaterials 12 01408 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Qiu, L.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Cui, P.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Z. Photoelectrochemical Response Enhancement for Metallofullerene-[12]Cycloparaphenylene Supramolecular Complexes. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091408

AMA Style

Zhang J, Qiu L, Liu L, Liu Y, Cui P, Wang F, Zhang Z. Photoelectrochemical Response Enhancement for Metallofullerene-[12]Cycloparaphenylene Supramolecular Complexes. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(9):1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091408

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jie, Ling Qiu, Linshan Liu, Yang Liu, Peng Cui, Fang Wang, and Zhuxia Zhang. 2022. "Photoelectrochemical Response Enhancement for Metallofullerene-[12]Cycloparaphenylene Supramolecular Complexes" Nanomaterials 12, no. 9: 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091408

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop