Next Article in Journal
Novel Water-Based Paints for Composite Materials Used in Electromagnetic Shielding Applications
Previous Article in Journal
On-Surface Thermal Stability of a Graphenic Structure Incorporating a Tropone Moiety
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/nano12030486
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Highly Efficient Visible Light Active Doped ZnO Photocatalysts for the Treatment of Wastewater Contaminated with Dyes and Pathogens of Emerging Concern

by
Saima Aftab
1,
Tayyaba Shabir
2,
Afzal Shah
1,*,
Jan Nisar
3,
Iltaf Shah
4,*,
Haji Muhammad
5 and
Noor S. Shah
6
1
Department of Chemistry, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
2
Department of Chemistry, Women University Multan, Multan 60000, Pakistan
3
National Centre of Excellence in Physical Chemistry, University of Peshawar, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan
4
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
5
Department of Chemistry, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Sciences and Technology, Karachi 75300, Pakistan
6
Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari Campus, Vehari 61100, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(3), 486; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030486
Submission received: 5 January 2022 / Revised: 21 January 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2022 / Published: 29 January 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Water is obligatory for sustaining life on Earth. About 71% of the Earth’s surface is covered in water. However, only one percent of the total water is drinkable. The presence of contaminants in wastewater, surface water, groundwater, and drinking water is a serious threat to human and environmental health. Their toxic effects and resistance towards conventional water treatment methods have compelled the scientific community to search for an environmentally friendly method that could efficiently degrade toxic contaminants. In this regard, visible light active photocatalysts have proved to be efficient in eliminating a wide variety of water toxins. A plethora of research activities have been carried out and significant amounts of funds are spent on the monitoring and removal of water contaminants, but relatively little attention has been paid to the degradation of persistent water pollutants. In this regard, nanoparticles of doped ZnO are preferred options owing to their low recombination rate and excellent photocatalytic and antimicrobial activity under irradiation of solar light. The current article presents the roles of these nanomaterials for wastewater treatment from pollutants of emerging concern.

1. Introduction

Semiconducting nanomaterials have received the utmost attention of researchers owing to their applicability in electronic devices, solar energy harvesting devices, drug delivery, water purification, pharmaceutical industries, biosensors, and ceramics [1,2]. Among nanomaterials, ZnO is of special interest for researchers thanks to its environmentally benign nature. Its band gap is 3.4 eV and it is commonly doped with elements of group I and V in an attempt to make p-type ZnO for use as a visible light active photocatalyst. The literature survey reveals that oxygen deficient sites, Zn centres, and hydrogen bond ability facilitate electron doping in ZnO [3,4,5,6,7]. Doped zinc oxides are used as visible light active photocatalysts for the degradation of emerging pollutants (EPs), which demand special attention owing to their health hazardous effects.
More than seven-hundred EPs have been reported so for. They are natural or synthetic compounds that adversely affect the human health and environment. Emerging pollutants include fungicides, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, industrial supplements, and so on. The fate and transit of developing pollutants in the environment, as well as their toxicological effects, are poorly understood [8,9]. Hence, further investigations are required for Eps’ elimination or their conversion to less harmful or nontoxic compounds. In this regard, photocatalysts are the subject of extensive investigations owing to their ability of degrading, detoxifying, or rendering the contaminants harmless. Semiconducting photocatalysts produce electron–hole pairs by the absorption of band gap matching photon. The resulting electron–hole pairs start a complex chain of reactions on the semi conductor’s surface that leads to the degradation of contaminants adsorbed on the surface of semiconductor [10,11].
Zinc oxide is photoactive and its photoactivity is further enhanced by doping. The empty octahedral sites in the hexagonal closed packed structure of zinc oxide generate interstitial gaps that are occupied by other atoms or defects. These imperfections add to zinc oxide’s photocatalytic activity [12]. A variety of methods such as sol–gel, hydrothermal, spray pyrolysis, microwave-assisted procedure, chemical vapour deposition, ultrasonic condition, and precipitation approaches are used for the synthesis of zinc oxide. Compared with chemical methods, biological methods of its synthesis are gaining more popularity because they are simpler, cheaper, and safer [13,14].
Doping of ZnO is done to lower its band gap so that it can absorb visible light, which constitutes 40–45% of sunlight. Doping also alters the electronic and optical characteristics of photocatalysts [15]. Hence, doped zinc oxide is used in various fields, from tyres to clay, medicines to agriculture, and paint to chemicals [16,17]. The resilience of ZnO to high energy radiations implies its entrenchment for space utilization, the tendency of ZnO to etch in acidic or basic solutions implying its suitability for manufacturing smaller devices, and its sensitivity to chemical species are additional appealing properties [18,19]. Moreover, ZnO has been proven as an effective photocatalyst for the degradation of various pollutants [20,21,22]. Its photocatalytic activity is further increased by quantum confinement effect by tuning the electron energy band gap. Although a few reviews on visible light active photocatalysts are available, a review of recent reports is always needed to update the readers about this research field. Moreover, in comparison with previous review articles focused on various pollutants, the present review is particularly dedicated to the removal of highly hazardous pollutants of emerging concern using doped zinc oxides as potential photocatalysts. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on doped zinc oxides nanomaterials that target the elimination of extremely toxic dyes and pathogens from water, and thus hold promise for protecting ecological and human health.

2. Structure and Properties of ZnO

Crystallized ZnO in wurtzite hexagonal lattice form possesses oxygen ions in the tightest hexagonal packing. The tetrahedral locations are occupied by zinc ions (Figure 1). On the hexagonal side, or c axis, the spacing between close neighbours is slightly smaller than the other three. Although the interaction is polar according to the c axis, there is a homopolar component of binding between zinc and oxygen ions [23].

3. Visible Light Active (VLA) ZnO Photocatalysts

The development of VLA photocatalysts to challenge water contamination is attracting the attention of researchers, because visible light makes up a significant fraction of the solar spectrum. Accordingly, many new photocatalytic materials have been recently developed to disinfect water. ZnO NPs is one of these materials, thanks to its excellent quantum efficiency and electrical structure that prevents the chances of recombination of electrons/charge in the electrolyte. Accordingly, many new doped ZnO-based photocatalytic materials have been developed for disinfecting water. The band width of ZnO is altered with defects like doping with non-metals and metals [24]. Figure 2 indicates the general characteristics of dopants to increase the photoactivity of ZnO nanoparticles in the presence of visible-light.
The objective of reducing the band gap of ZnO is to make the device work in the visible light range. There can be a decrease in the band width and activation under visible light by producing new energy levels within the band gap. By combining components, the band gap can be narrowed and, within the band gap, structural inadequacies lead to new levels of energy [25]. This has been depicted in Figure 3 by a simplified illustration where donor levels are introduced owing to the hydrogenation of zinc oxide microstructures within the gap between bands.
ZnO NPs doped with non-metals have emerged as excellent materials owing to greater photocatalytic activity under solar light and a low recombination rate [26]. By incorporating additional components such as S, F, and N, it is possible to minimize the band gap in ZnO [27,28]. Figure 4a shows the valence band (VB) of pure zinc oxide, which generally consists of O 2s, O 2p, and Zn 3p states, whereas O 2p, Zn 4s, and Zn 3s states dominate the conduction band. The fermi levels set to zero are shown by the dotted line. Figure 4b demonstrates the direct band gap of zinc oxide, where the CB minima and VB maxima are both located at the same symmetric gamma G point. The CB minima and VB maxima are placed at the equivalent symmetric gamma G point, which show direct bandgap properties of ZnO. Furthermore, these non-metallic dopants of C and P have little impact on the lattice constant (6.58 A°) of ZnO, which changes to 6.60 in the case of C doping and 6.62 in the case of P doping. The conduction band changes to a lower energy in comparison with pure ZnO [29]. Incorporation of B and F in ZnO has been reported to increase the electrical properties [30].
Nitrogen is considered as the most effective dopant for p-type ZnO. However, obtaining consistent and stable p-type doping poses significant difficulties. For instance, there is no way to compensate the indigenous handicap caused by the usage of n-type doping. Research on doping N and N2 in ZnO has revealed that N2 at the Zn site acts as a shallow recipient, and at the O-site, it acts as a donor, while N acts as a deep recipient [31,32,33,34]. A number of methods such as molecular beam epitaxy, active sputtering, chemical fumes, and ZnO ammonolysis at low temperatures are used for producing nitrogen-doped ZnO. Using the proper nitrogen supply and promoting nitrogen introduction into oxide using a solution combustion method is a simple, yet promising method of nitrogen fixation in oxide [35]. N-doping in ZnO causes narrowing of the band gap in ZnO and increases the absorption of visible light [36,37]. The photocatalytic activity of ZnO towards the breakdown of organic dyes is increased by enhanced VL absorption, which is ascribed to the formation of localized states of N 2p in the bandgap [38].

4. Use of ZnO for the Breakdown of Dyes

Zinc oxide is extensively used for the breakdown of potentially harmful water pollutants. The majority of commonly used water treatment methods such as chemical treatment, adsorption, and membrane filtration are useful, but inadequate for complete removal of pollutants from wastewater [39]. Additionally, these approaches produce by-products such as sludge as solid waste and toxic gases that need further treatment. Therefore, for effective water clean-up, visible light active zinc-oxide-based photocatalysis is receiving special attention. Photocatalysis uses photoexcited charge carriers for the breakdown of organic contaminants. The photoactivity of ZnO is utilized for destroying such water toxins [40].
Shinde et al. [41] investigated two methods of dye degradation. In one method, the transport of electron into CB of photocatalyst occurs by photon having energy equal to or greater than the band gap of nanoparticles. The excited electrons result in the formation of holes in valence band. The generated electrons and holes leads to free radical formation [42]. The oxidation of pigments is triggered by the holes present in the valence band.
h+VB + dye → dye * → dye degradation
The second method involves dye sensitization, where dye on the water surface absorbs visible radiation. The absorbed photon excites electrons of dye molecules from HOMO to LUMO. The electron present in LUMO shifts to the conduction band of ZnO. On reaction with O2, this electron yields O2−, which causes the breakdown of pollutants present in water. The schematics of both methods can be seen in Figure 5.
T. Bora et al. [43] reported the potential antibacterial activity of ZnO nanorods and their photocatalytic activity towards the breakdown of methylene blue and phenol (Figure 6). The rate constant for photocatalytic breakdown of methylene blue dye and phenol was found to be 0.032 and 0.094 min−1, respectively, at 250 °C. Similarly, ZnO doped with Ag degrades organic dyes by the prevention of hole and electron recombination, which enhances the photocatalytic activity, as expected [44]. The degradation efficiency of ZnO doped with silver was found to be 99.64% against rhodamine B.
Kumar et al. [45] also discovered that the photocatalytic activity of ZnO is increased on doping with Ag. Nanoparticles of Ag-ZnO developed with 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06 percent of Ag showed 3.03 eV, 3.01 eV, and 2.96 eV band gaps, respectively. As discussed earlier, doping lowers the energy required to shift an electron from valence band to conduction band [46]. William et al. [47] used Ag-doped ZnO thin film for the degradation of methylene blue. The results of their experiments revealed that silver-doped ZnO degrades dye more effectively (45.1%) than a pure ZnO (2.7%) film under irradiation of VL. In the same area of study, Sabry et al. [48] carried out some modification in Ag-doped ZnO nanostructure by introducing stearic acid for the breakdown of methylene blue and achieved 93% breakdown efficiency after 80 min exposure to visible light. Liu et al. [49] also used doped Ag-ZnO and found it to be effective for the degradation of Congo Red. Figure 7 presents the optical properties of doped ZnO by photoluminescence and UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy. Using the W Xe lamp, Congo Red, Methyl Orange, and Methylene Blue were photocatalytically broken down. A 0.25 M Ag-doped ZnO showed maximum photocatalytic activity of 91.9% in 120 min under a solar light simulator.
Saffari et al. [50] prepared pure ZnO and P-containing ZnO for Rhodamine B degradation. Using a halogen lamp, visible light in the wavelength range of 375–1000 nm was employed. A lowering in the electrons and holes recombination rate in the sample containing 1.8% of phosphorus resulted in complete breakdown of RhB dye in 180 min. Kuriakose et al. [51] applied Cu-doped ZnO for the degradation of methyl orange and methylene blue dyes. Furthermore, 5% Cu doping in ZnO led to 92% and 80% degradation of methylene blue and methyl orange, respectively, in 30 min. Vaiano et al. [52] used ZnO doped with Cu for photocatalytic oxidation of As (III) to As (V). Here, 52% photocatalysis was observed after VL exposure of 180 min for ZnO doped with 1.08% of Cu. Similarly, Kamlesh et al. [53] employed Cu-doped ZnO nanoparticles for methyl green degradation and, under irradiation of VL, noticed a 3.5-fold enhancement in photocatalytic activity against methyl green as compared with undoped ZnO.
Vinodkumar et al. [54] studied the impact of Mg doping on the photocatalytic performance of ZnO. Compared with ZnO, 0.1% MgZnO showed a twofold higher photocatalytic efficiency. Adam et al. [55] also synthesized Mg-doped ZnO nanoparticles and investigated their role for the degradation of methylene blue. ZnO on doping with 0, 3, 5, and 7% of Mg resulted in approximately 55, 65, 77, and 96% decolouration of MB dye, respectively. The improved photocatalytic performance by Mg-doped ZnO can be attributed to the role of Mg in the ZnO lattice that enhances the hydroxyl ions’ absorption at the nanoparticle surface and works as trap sites to increase the photodegradation as well as to lower the electron–hole pair recombination. Adeel et al. [56] investigated ZnO doped with Co to remove methyl orange from wastewater. Figure 8 shows that ZnO doped with 10% Co causes 93% methyl orange degradation. The authors ascribed the increase in photocatalysis to the prevention of electron–hole recombination.
Hernandez et al. [57] compared the photocatalytic efficiency of undoped and Eu doped ZnO. A 99.3% breakdown of methylene blue dye was achieved with doped nanoparticles. Similary, Tb- and Eu-doped ZnO NPs showed 100% photodegradation of methylene blue and facilitated reduction of CO2 and production of H2 [58]. Petronela et al. [59] synthesized Ni-Co codoped ZnO NPs to check their efficiency towards the removal of Rhodamine B dye from contaminated water in the presence of visible light, which was found to be 42% for 0.69% of both of the dopants. Similarly, Shanmugam et al. [60] probed the photocatalysis of ZnO/Cu/Sn nanoparticles and found these to have much better photocatalytic activity towards methylene blue, which was completely degraded in 180 min under visible light irradiation.
Qin et al. [61] observed the ability of ZnO-graphene nanocomposites for the removal of methylene blue from wastewater. High absorptivity of the dye and charge separation process led to enhanced photocatalytic degradation efficiency of the nanocomposites. Ruhullah et al. [62] prepared Mn-doped ZnO and found these to be effective for the breakdown of basic aniline dye and methylene blue dye. In another study, carbon nanotubes supported Mn-doped ZnO NPs efficiently photodegraded >95% malachite green in water under irradation of VL [63]. Similarly, Labhne et al. reported photodegradation of rhodamine B (99% in 140 min) and congo red (100% in 160 min) using Mn-doped ZnO supported with reduced graphene [64]. Maline Ghosh et al. [65] used a bimetallic photocatalyst, which resulted in 90% breakdown of caffeine with a rate constant of 0.024 min−1. Subhan et al. [66] prepared a trimetallic oxide nanocomposite ZnO.CuO.CeO2, which exhibited 97% photocatalytic dye degradation activity. ZnO nanorods doped with Nd and Gd were also reported for methylene blue degradation under illumination of VL. A 1.5% Nd-Gd codoped ZnO resulted in 93% photocatalytic breakdown of MB in 180 min [67]. The photocatalytic efficiency of other doped zinc oxides for the degradation of various dyes can be seen in Table 1 [68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. Thus, it can be concluded that doping increases the photocatalytic characteristics of ZnO nanostructures.

5. Water Disinfection with Visible Light Active ZnO-Based Photocatalysts

Booming industrialization has led to water quality deterioration. Chlorination and ozonization methods are frequently used for disinfecting water. However, these methods are not free from limitations; for example, various carcinogenic by-products are produced during chlorination and ozonization [78,79,80]. Photocatalysts hold great promise for effectively treating contaminated water. Among the photocatalysts, ZnO has received enormous attention as a disinfectant thanks to its stable nature under severe processing environments [81]. Moreover, it does not cause secondary pollution. Its phase composition, particle size distribution, defective surface, and specific surface area play their role in antibacterial/antimicrobial activity. ZnO nanoparticles adopt different ways for their antimicrobial activity, such as release of oxygen species and Zn2+, which can kill microorganisms by damaging their DNA and cell membrane. ZnO also exerts antimicrobial activity when it comes in direct contact with the cell membrane of microbes [81,82,83,84]. Gancheva and colleagues [85] utilized zinc oxide powder for disinfecting water. The azo dye of Malachite Green was removed from water in 180 min using ZnO powder in the presence of visible light during the disinfection procedure. Mahamuni et al. [86] found that ZnO particles had varying degrees of antibiofilm and antibacterial action against Gram-negative and Gram-positive Staphylococcus and Proteus vulagaris. The antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of ZnO nanoparticles was found to vary inversely with particle size. At a concentration of about 50 μg/mL, it inhibited 32.67 percent of Staphylococcus aureus and 22.38 percent of Proteus vulgaris, respectively. The greatest biofilm resistance against Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus was 67.3 percent and 58.18 percent, respectively, for 250 μg/mL concentration of ZnO. In one particular study, Haque et al. [87] reported that ZnO prepared by the biological method degraded methylene blue dye up to 80% in 20 min, compared with 68 percent by ZnO produced by the sol–gel approach. So, according to this study, ZnO prepared by the biosynthetic approach outperforms ZnO prepared via the sol–gel method in terms of water disinfection. Working in this area, Ogunyemi, et al. [88] found the maximum antibacterial activity of ZnO NPs produced via using olive leaves compared with chamomile flower and red tomato fruit (Figure 9). Olea europaea ZnONPs had the maximum inhibitory zone of 2.2 cm at 16.0 μg/mL. The authors attributed this excellent activity to the small crystallite size of ZnO NPs.
Similarly, J. Suresh et al. [89] also synthesized zinc oxide NPs in combination with Costus Pictus D. leaf extracts. Biosynthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles showed greater antimicrobial activity against fungal and bacterial species. The zone of inhibition for B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. paratyphi, and E. coli was found to be 17, 10, 12, and 10 mm, respectively. Inhibition and cell survival were found to increase with the increasing concentration of ZnO nanoparticles. Working in this area, Panchal et al. [90] mixed seed extract from Ocimum tenuiflorum to Ag/ZnO NPs and observed improved antimicrobial activity in comparison with pure NPs and Ag/ZnO. In 15 min, bacteria with a density of 1 × 108 cfu were killed by 1.0% Ag/ZnO nanocomposite.
Weiwei He et al. studied the antibacterial activity of Au/ZnO hybrid nanostructures [91] and found that deposition of gold nanoparticles in the molar ratio of 0.2% on ZnO surface significantly increased the antibacterial activity of ZnO. ZnO/Au nanostructures were found to be nearly three times more efficient than pure ZnO nanoparticles at killing E. coli. Similarly, doping ZnO with other nanoparticles such as Ag, Sn TiO2, and Cu also show improved properties. For instance, Shanmugam et al. [60] developed an Sn/Cu-doped ZnO photocatalyst and found that it completely removes methylene blue in 180 min under visible light. They found an increase in the photodegradation rate of doped ZnO in contrast to undoped ZnO by a factor of 2.6, and the photocatalyst showed good antibacterial activity against the pathogens E. coli and S. aureus (G+).
Qamar et al. [92] discovered the antimicrobial properties of hybrid g-C3N4/Cr-ZnO nanocomposite. These nanocomposites were found to cause 93% removal of methylene blue in 90 min. The enhancement in photocatalysis of hybrid composite was due to good separation of electron and hole pairs and absorption. Good antibacterial activity of composites was observed against Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus salivarius) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) bacteria. The inhibition zone was found to be approximately 18, 19, 17, and 15 mm for B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. salivarius, and E. coli, respectively. Munawar et al. [93] synthesized heterostructured nanocomposite ZnO-Er2O3-Yb2O3, which demonstrated enhanced antibacterial activity against E. coli (Esherichia coli). The Fe/ZnO nanoparticles prepared by Das et al. photocatalytically disinfected multidrug-resistant E. Coli in true samples from a municipal tap, river, and pond. Fe/ZnO nanoparticles were found to disinfect E. Coli completely in 90 min [94]. Li-doped ZnO NPs proved to be promising against E. faecalis, S. tyjimurium, and Esherichia coli [95]. Darwish and his group [96] reported the potential of Sm/Ag/ZnO/cuttlefish bone nanorods in destroying S. mansoni worms. The percentage inhibition was documented to be 20 and 47% for P. aeruginosa and S. aureua, respectively. These literature findings depict that doped ZnO NPs endowed with photocatalytic and antimicrobial activity are ideal nanomaterials for water treatment and disinfection applications.

6. Conclusions

The presence of water toxins, especially dyes and pathogens, is challenging scientists to search for highly effective, cost affordable, and environmentally friendly methods for water purification. This driving force has led to remarkable scientific research in wastewater treatment. One of the environmentally friendly technologies for water treatment is the use of visible light active photocatalysts. In this regard, ZnO has been given special attention as it is nontoxic and its band gap is switched by earth abundant elements of group I and V, making doped zinc oxides cost-effective and suitable for working under visible light, which is a major (45%) portion of sunlight. The results presented in this document reveal the competency of doped zinc oxide for disinfecting water under visible light irradiation. Doping reduces the chances of electron and hole pairs’ recombination and, consequently, their availability initiates free-radical-based degradation of water pollutants. The results reveal that the photocatalytic performance of doped ZnO depends on various factors such as the concentration of the dopant, their energy states within the ZnO lattice, localized states of dopants in the bandgap of ZnO, dopants sites’ distribution, electron hole pair recombination, and the intensity of incident light. ZnO nanomaterials have the ability to remove microbes and organic dyes from wastewater. The commercial application of doped ZnO nanoparticles can be anticipated in the near future owing to their nontoxic, low-cost, improved photocatalytic, and antimicrobial activity. The presented work targets the elimination of extremely toxic dyes and pathogens with the potential to remove them from water, thus protecting ecological and human health. However, highly efficient photocatalytic degradation and antimicrobial activity still demand more research to design more effective doped ZnO NPs and ZnO-based nanocomposites. Future endeavors will be focused on beating the challenge of synthesizing doped ZnOs with a suitable bandgap. The selection of materials remains a vital consideration for achieving this future targeted objective.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., I.S. and N.S.S.; methodology, S.A. and T.S.; software, S.A.; validation, A.S., J.N. and S.A.; formal analysis, T.S.; investigation, T.S.; resources, A.S.; data curation, J.N.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A. and T.S.; writing—review and editing, J.N., H.M. and N.S.S.; visualization, I.S.; supervision, A.S.; project administration, A.S. and J.N.; funding acquisition, I.S. and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Iltaf Shah graciously acknowledges the generous support of UAE University (SDG-Grant-2022) and Afzal Shah gratefully acknowledges the support of Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not relevant to our study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Article was written in the light of all mentioned references.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rahman, B.; Viphavakit, C.; Chitaree, R.; Ghosh, S.; Pathak, A.K.; Verma, S.; Sakda, N. Optical Fiber, Nanomaterial, and THz-Metasurface-Mediated Nano-Biosensors: A Review. Biosensors 2022, 12, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zafar, N.; Madni, A.; Khalid, A.; Khan, T.; Kousar, R.; Naz, S.S.; Wahid, F. Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications of Green Synthesized Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 26, 5844–5865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Annu, A.A.; Ahmed, S. Green synthesis of metal, metal oxide nanoparticles, and their various applications. Handb. Ecomater. 2018, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Musa, I.; Qamhieh, N. Study of optical energy gap and quantum confinement effects in zinc oxide nanoparticles and nanorods. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2019, 14, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim, K.J.; Kreider, P.B.; Choi, C.; Chang, C.H.; Ahn, H.G. Visible-light-sensitive Na-doped p-type flower-like ZnO photocatalysts synthesized via a continuous flow microreactor. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 12702–12710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fortunato, E.; Gonçalves, A.; Pimentel, A.; Barquinha, P.; Gonçalves, G.; Pereira, L.; Ferreira, I.; Martins, R. Zinc oxide, a multifunctional material: From material to device applications. Appl. Phys. A 2009, 96, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ates, T.; Tatar, C.; Yakuphanoglu, F. Preparation of semiconductor ZnO powders by sol–gel method: Humidity sensors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2013, 190, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Naidu, R.; Espana, V.A.A.; Liu, Y.; Jit, J. Emerging contaminants in the environment: Risk-based analysis for better management. Chemosphere 2016, 154, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Geissen, V.; Mol, H.; Klumpp, E.; Umlauf, G.; Nadal, M.; van der Ploeg, M.; van de Zee, S.E.; Ritsema, C.J. Emerging pollutants in the environment: A challenge for water resource management. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2015, 3, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castellote, M.; Bengtsson, N. Principles of TiO2 photocatalysis. In Applications of Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysis to Construction Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  11. Xie, J.; Wang, H.; Duan, M.; Zhang, L. Synthesis and photocatalysis properties of ZnO structures with different morphologies via hydrothermal method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 6358–6363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kajbafvala, A.; Ghorbani, H.; Paravar, A.; Samberg, J.P.; Kajbafvala, E.; Sadrnezhaad, S. Effects of morphology on photocatalytic performance of Zinc oxide nanostructures synthesized by rapid microwave irradiation methods. Superlattices Microstruct. 2012, 51, 512–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fakhari, S.; Jamzad, M.; Fard, H.K. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles: A comparison. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2019, 12, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sangeetha, G.; Rajeshwari, S.; Venckatesh, R. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles by aloe barbadensis miller leaf extract: Structure and optical properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011, 46, 2560–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rekha, K.; Nirmala, M.; Nair, M.G.; Anukaliani, A. Structural, optical, photocatalytic and antibacterial activity of zinc oxide and manganese doped zinc oxide nanoparticles. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2010, 405, 3180–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mustapha, S.; Ndamitso, M.M.; Abdulkareem, A.S.; Tijani, J.O.; Shuaib, D.T.; Ajala, A.O.; Mohammed, A.K. Application of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles immobilized on clay in wastewater treatment: A review. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chakraborty, S.; Kumbhakar, P. Observation of exciton–phonon coupling and enhanced photoluminescence emission in ZnO nanotwins synthesized by a simple wet chemical approach. Mater. Lett. 2013, 100, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gionco, C.; Fabbri, D.; Calza, P.; Paganini, M.C. Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic tests of N-doped zinc oxide: A new interesting photocatalyst. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 4129864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rodnyi, P.; Khodyuk, I. Optical and luminescence properties of zinc oxide. Opt. Spectrosc. 2011, 111, 776–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sorbiun, M.; Mehr, E.S.; Ramazani, A.; Fardood, S.T. Green synthesis of zinc oxide and copper oxide nanoparticles using aqueous extract of oak fruit hull (jaft) and comparing their photocatalytic degradation of basic violet 3. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2018, 12, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, J.; Ali, H.; Hurh, J.; Han, Y.; Batjikh, I.; Rupa, E.J.; Anandapadmanaban, G.; Park, J.K.; Yang, D.C. The assessment of photocatalytic activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles from the roots of Codonopsis lanceolata synthesized by one-pot green synthesis method. Optik 2019, 184, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Madhumitha, G.; Fowsiya, J.; Gupta, N.; Kumar, A.; Singh, M. Green synthesis, characterization and antifungal and photocatalytic activity of Pithecellobium dulce peel–mediated ZnO nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 127, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Heiland, G.; Mollwo, E.; Stöckmann, F. Electronic processes in zinc oxide. In Solid State Physics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1959; pp. 191–323. [Google Scholar]
  24. Samadi, M.; Zirak, M.; Naseri, A.; Khorashadizade, E.; Moshfegh, A.Z. Recent progress on doped ZnO nanostructures for visible-light photocatalysis. Thin Solid Film. 2016, 605, 2–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Farooq, M.H.; Aslam, I.; Anam, H.S.; Tanveer, M.; Ali, Z.; Ghani, U.; Boddula, R. Improved photocatalytic performance of reduced zinc oxide (ZnO) novel morphology of astray like microstructure under solar light irradiation. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2019, 2, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumari, V.; Mittal, A.; Jindal, J.; Yadav, S.; Kumar, N. S-, N-and C-doped ZnO as semiconductor photocatalysts: A review. Front. Mater. Sci. 2019, 13, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wen, J.Q.; Chen, G.X.; Zhang, J.M.; Li, D.M.; Zhang, X.Z. Magnetic transition in nonmetal N-and F-doping g-ZnO monolayer with different concentrations. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2018, 31, 3133–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, J.; Lu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, S.; Sato, T.; Saito, F. Mechanochemical doping of a non-metal element into zinc oxide. Chem. Sustain. Dev. 2007, 15, 249–253. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma, Z.; Ren, F.; Ming, X.; Long, Y.; Volinsky, A.A. Cu-doped ZnO electronic structure and optical properties studied by first-principles calculations and experiments. Materials 2019, 12, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Li, Q.; Zhu, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Niu, W.; Guo, Y.; Ye, Z. Highly conductive thin films of nonmetal F and B co-doped ZnO on flexible substrates: Experiment and first-principles calculations. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 697, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boonchun, A.; Lambrecht, W.R. Electronic structure of defects and doping in ZnO: Oxygen vacancy and nitrogen doping. Phys. Status Solidi (B) 2013, 250, 2091–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Byzynski, G.; Melo, C.; Volanti, D.P.; Ferrer, M.M.; Gouveia, A.F.; Ribeiro, C.; Andrés, J.; Longo, E. The interplay between morphology and photocatalytic activity in ZnO and N-doped ZnO crystals. Mater. Des. 2017, 120, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Oliveira, J.A.; Nogueira, A.E.; Goncalves, M.C.; Paris, E.C.; Ribeiro, C.; Poirier, G.Y.; Giraldi, T.R. Photoactivity of N-doped ZnO nanoparticles in oxidative and reductive reactions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 433, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumari, R.; Sahai, A.; Goswami, N. Effect of nitrogen doping on structural and optical properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2015, 25, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Soöllradl, S.; Greiwe, M.; Bukas, V.J.; Buchner, M.R.; Widenmeyer, M.; Kandemir, T.; Zweifel, T.; Senyshyn, A.; Guünther, S.; Nilges, T. Nitrogen-doping in ZnO via combustion synthesis? Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 4188–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zeuner, A.; Alves, H.; Sann, J.; Kriegseis, W.; Neumann, C.; Hofmann, D.; Meyer, B.; Hoffmann, A.; Haboeck, U.; Straßburg, M. Nitrogen doping in bulk and epitaxial ZnO. Phys. Status Solidi (C) 2004, 1, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qiu, Y.; Yan, K.; Deng, H.; Yang, S. Secondary branching and nitrogen doping of ZnO nanotetrapods: Building a highly active network for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, Z.; Yin, L.-C.; Xie, Y.; Liu, G.; Ma, X.; Cheng, H.-M. Crystallinity-dependent substitutional nitrogen doping in ZnO and its improved visible light photocatalytic activity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 400, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Balcha, A.; Yadav, O.P.; Dey, T. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye by zinc oxide nanoparticles obtained from precipitation and sol-gel methods. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 25485–25493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Irani, M.; Mohammadi, T.; Mohebbi, S. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue with ZnO nanoparticles; a joint experimental and theoretical study. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2016, 60, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shinde, D.R.; Tambade, P.S.; Chaskar, M.G.; Gadave, K.M. Photocatalytic degradation of dyes in water by analytical reagent grades ZnO, TiO2 and SnO2: A comparative study. Drink. Water Eng. Sci. 2017, 10, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Rakibuddin, M.; Ananthakrishnan, R. Novel nano coordination polymer based synthesis of porous ZnO hexagonal nanodisk for higher gas sorption and photocatalytic activities. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 362, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bora, T.; Sathe, P.; Laxman, K.; Dobretsov, S.; Dutta, J. Defect engineered visible light active ZnO nanorods for photocatalytic treatment of water. Catal. Today 2017, 284, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, X.; Qiu, L.; Luo, X. ZIF-8 derived Ag-doped ZnO photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 4890–4894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kumar, S.; Singh, V.; Tanwar, A. Structural, morphological, optical and photocatalytic properties of Ag-doped ZnO nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 2166–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ashebir, M.E.; Tesfamariam, G.M.; Nigussie, G.Y.; Gebreab, T.W. Structural, optical, and photocatalytic activities of Ag-doped and Mn-doped ZnO nanoparticles. J. Nanomater. 2018, 2018, 9425938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vallejo, W.; Cantillo, A.; Díaz-Uribe, C. Methylene blue photodegradation under visible irradiation on Ag-Doped ZnO thin films. Int. J. Photoenergy 2020, 2020, 1627498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sabry, R.S.; Rahmah, M.I.; Aziz, W.J. A systematic study to evaluate effects of stearic acid on superhydrophobicity and photocatalytic properties of Ag-doped ZnO nanostructures. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 13382–13391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, J.; Li, J.; Wei, F.; Zhao, X.; Su, Y.; Han, X. Ag–ZnO submicrometer rod arrays for high-efficiency photocatalytic degradation of Congo red and disinfection. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 11258–11266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saffari, R.; Shariatinia, Z.; Jourshabani, M. Synthesis and photocatalytic degradation activities of phosphorus containing ZnO microparticles under visible light irradiation for water treatment applications. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kuriakose, S.; Satpati, B.; Mohapatra, S. Highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes by Cu doped ZnO nanostructures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 25172–25181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vaiano, V.; Iervolino, G.; Rizzo, L. Cu-doped ZnO as efficient photocatalyst for the oxidation of arsenite to arsenate under visible light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 238, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chandekar, K.V.; Shkir, M.; Al-Shehri, B.M.; AlFaify, S.; Halor, R.G.; Khan, A.; Al-Namshah, K.S.; Hamdy, M.S. Visible light sensitive Cu doped ZnO: Facile synthesis, characterization and high photocatalytic response. Mater. Charact. 2020, 165, 110387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Etacheri, V.; Roshan, R.; Kumar, V. Mg-doped ZnO nanoparticles for efficient sunlight-driven photocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 2717–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Adam, R.E.; Alnoor, H.; Pozina, G.; Liu, X.; Willander, M.; Nur, O. Synthesis of Mg-doped ZnO NPs via a chemical low-temperature method and investigation of the efficient photocatalytic activity for the degradation of dyes under solar light. Solid State Sci. 2020, 99, 106053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Adeel, M.; Saeed, M.; Khan, I.; Muneer, M.; Akram, N. Synthesis and characterization of Co–ZnO and evaluation of its photocatalytic activity for photodegradation of methyl orange. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 1426–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hernández-Carrillo, M.; Torres-Ricárdez, R.; García-Mendoza, M.; Ramírez-Morales, E.; Rojas-Blanco, L.; Díaz-Flores, L.; Sepúlveda-Palacios, G.; Paraguay-Delgado, F.; Pérez-Hernández, G. Eu-modified ZnO nanoparticles for applications in photocatalysis. Catal. Today 2020, 349, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ahmad, I.; Akhtar, M.S.; Ahmed, E.; Ahmad, M.; Keller, V.; Khan, W.Q.; Khalid, N. Rare earth co-doped ZnO photocatalysts: Solution combustion synthesis and environmental applications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 237, 116328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pascariu, P.; Tudose, I.V.; Suchea, M.; Koudoumas, E.; Fifere, N.; Airinei, A. Preparation and characterization of Ni, Co doped ZnO nanoparticles for photocatalytic applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 448, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shanmugam, V.; Jeyaperumal, K.S. Investigations of visible light driven Sn and Cu doped ZnO hybrid nanoparticles for photocatalytic performance and antibacterial activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 449, 617–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Qin, J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.; Cao, M.; Ma, M.; Liu, R. ZnO microspheres-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 392, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ullah, R.; Dutta, J. Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes with manganese-doped ZnO nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 156, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mohamed, R.; Shawky, A. CNT supported Mn-doped ZnO nanoparticles: Simple synthesis and improved photocatalytic activity for degradation of malachite green dye under visible light. Appl. Nanosci. 2018, 8, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Labhane, P.; Patle, L.; Sonawane, G.; Sonawane, S. Fabrication of ternary Mn doped ZnO nanoparticles grafted on reduced graphene oxide (RGO) sheet as an efficient solar light driven photocatalyst. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2018, 710, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ghosh, M.; Manoli, K.; Shen, X.; Wang, J.; Ray, A.K. Solar photocatalytic degradation of caffeine with titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2019, 377, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Subhan, M.A.; Uddin, N.; Sarker, P.; Azad, A.K.; Begum, K. Photoluminescence, photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of CeO2· CuO· ZnO nanocomposite fabricated by co-precipitation method. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 149, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Akhtar, J.; Tahir, M.; Sagir, M.; Bamufleh, H.S. Improved photocatalytic performance of Gd and Nd co-doped ZnO nanorods for the degradation of methylene blue. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 11955–11961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Arshad, M.; Qayyum, A.; Abbas, G.; Haider, R.; Iqbal, M.; Nazir, A. Influence of different solvents on portrayal and photocatalytic activity of tin-doped zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 260, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nguyen, L.T.; Nguyen, L.T.; Duong, A.T.; Nguyen, B.D.; Hai, N.Q.; Chu, V.H.; Nguyen, T.D.; Bach, L.G. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of La-doped zinc oxide nanoparticles. Materials 2019, 12, 1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Babajani, N.; Jamshidi, S. Investigation of photocatalytic malachite green degradation by iridium doped zinc oxide nanoparticles: Application of response surface methodology. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 782, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yousefi, R.; Jamali-Sheini, F.; Cheraghizade, M.; Khosravi-Gandomani, S.; Saáaedi, A.; Huang, N.M.; Basirun, W.J.; Azarang, M. Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity of strontium-doped zinc oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Processing 2015, 32, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Khezami, L.; Taha, K.K.; Ghiloufi, I.; El Mir, L. Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of malachite green by vanadium doped zinc oxide nanoparticles. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 73, 881–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Goswami, M. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of synthesized Cobalt doped Zinc Oxide nanoparticles under visible light irradiation. Opt. Mater. 2020, 109, 110400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ebrahimi, R.; Hossienzadeh, K.; Maleki, A.; Ghanbari, R.; Rezaee, R.; Safari, M.; Shahmoradi, B.; Daraei, H.; Jafari, A.; Yetilmezsoy, K. Effects of doping zinc oxide nanoparticles with transition metals (Ag, Cu, Mn) on photocatalytic degradation of Direct Blue 15 dye under UV and visible light irradiation. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2019, 17, 479–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Alshamsi, H.A.H.; Hussein, B.S. Hydrothermal Preparation of Silver Doping Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Study the Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity. Orient. J. Chem. 2018, 34, 1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Saber, O.; El-Brolossy, T.A.; Al Jaafari, A.A. Improvement of photocatalytic degradation of naphthol green B under solar light using aluminum doping of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 4615–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, J.; Deng, S.; Liu, S.; Chen, J.; Han, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of Nd doped ZnO nanoparticles. Mater. Technol. 2014, 29, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ibrahim, M.M.; Asal, S. Physicochemical and photocatalytic studies of Ln3+-ZnO for water disinfection and wastewater treatment applications. J. Mol. Struct. 2017, 1149, 404–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yi, G.; Yuan, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. ZnO Nanopillar Coated Surfaces with Substrate-Dependent Superbactericidal Property. Small 2018, 14, 1703159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Rahman, A.H.; Misra, A.J.; Das, S.; Das, B.; Jayabalan, R.; Suar, M.; Mishra, A.; Tamhankar, A.J.; Lundborg, C.S.; Tripathy, S.K. Mechanistic insight into the disinfection of Salmonella sp. by sun-light assisted sonophotocatalysis using doped ZnO nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 336, 476–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dimapilis, E.A.S.; Hsu, C.-S.; Mendoza, R.M.O.; Lu, M.-C. Zinc oxide nanoparticles for water disinfection. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2018, 28, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sultana, K.A.; Islam, M.T.; Silva, J.A.; Turley, R.S.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Noveron, J.C. Sustainable synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant and generation of hydroxyl radical. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 307, 112931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rambabu, K.; Bharath, G.; Banat, F.; Show, P.L. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Phoenix dactylifera waste as bioreductant for effective dye degradation and antibacterial performance in wastewater treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Phan, D.-N.; Rebia, R.A.; Saito, Y.; Kharaghani, D.; Khatri, M.; Tanaka, T.; Lee, H.; Kim, I.-S. Zinc oxide nanoparticles attached to polyacrylonitrile nanofibers with hinokitiol as gluing agent for synergistic antibacterial activities and effective dye removal. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 85, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gancheva, M.; Markova-Velichkova, M.; Atanasova, G.; Kovacheva, D.; Uzunov, I.; Cukeva, R. Design and photocatalytic activity of nanosized zinc oxides. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 368, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mahamuni, P.P.; Patil, P.M.; Dhanavade, M.J.; Badiger, M.V.; Shadija, P.G.; Lokhande, A.C.; Bohara, R.A. Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles by using polyol chemistry for their antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2019, 17, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Haque, M.J.; Bellah, M.M.; Hassan, M.R.; Rahman, S. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles by two different methods & comparison of their structural, antibacterial, photocatalytic and optical properties. Nano Express 2020, 1, 010007. [Google Scholar]
  88. Ogunyemi, S.O.; Abdallah, Y.; Zhang, M.; Fouad, H.; Hong, X.; Ibrahim, E.; Masum, M.M.I.; Hossain, A.; Mo, J.; Li, B. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using different plant extracts and their antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Artificial cells. Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 341–352. [Google Scholar]
  89. Suresh, J.; Pradheesh, G.; Alexramani, V.; Sundrarajan, M.; Hong, S.I. Green synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticle using insulin plant (Costus pictus D. Don) and investigation of its antimicrobial as well as anticancer activities. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 015008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Panchal, P.; Paul, D.R.; Sharma, A.; Choudhary, P.; Meena, P.; Nehra, S. Biogenic mediated Ag/ZnO nanocomposites for photocatalytic and antibacterial activities towards disinfection of water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 563, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. He, W.; Kim, H.-K.; Wamer, W.G.; Melka, D.; Callahan, J.H.; Yin, J.-J. Photogenerated charge carriers and reactive oxygen species in ZnO/Au hybrid nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Qamar, M.A.; Shahid, S.; Javed, M.; Iqbal, S.; Sher, M.; Akbar, M.B. Highly efficient g-C3N4/Cr-ZnO nanocomposites with superior photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2020, 401, 112776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Munawar, T.; Yasmeen, S.; Hussain, A.; Akram, M.; Iqbal, F. Novel direct dual-Z-scheme ZnO-Er2O3-Yb2O3 heterostructured nanocomposite with superior photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. Mater. Lett. 2020, 264, 127357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Das, S.; Sinha, S.; Das, B.; Jayabalan, R.; Suar, M.; Mishra, A.; Tamhankar, A.J.; Lundborg, C.S.; Tripathy, S.K. Disinfection of multidrug resistant Escherichia coli by solar-photocatalysis using Fe-doped ZnO nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Oquendo-Cruz, A.; Perales-Pérez, O. Synthesis, characterization and bactericide properties of pure and Li doped ZnO nanoparticles for alternative water disinfection methods. J. Electron. Mater. 2018, 47, 6260–6265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Darwish, A.S.; Bayaumy, F.E.; Ismail, H.M. Photoactivated water-disinfecting, and biological properties of Ag NPs@ Sm-doped ZnO nanorods/cuttlefish bone composite: In-vitro bactericidal, cercaricidal and schistosomicidal studies. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 93, 996–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g001 550
Figure 1. The wurtzite lattice of zinc oxide. Adapted with permission from [23]. Copyright 1959, Elsevier.
Figure 1. The wurtzite lattice of zinc oxide. Adapted with permission from [23]. Copyright 1959, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g001
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g002 550
Figure 2. General properties of dopants for increasing the visible-light photocatalytics of ZnO. Adapted with permission from [24]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier.
Figure 2. General properties of dopants for increasing the visible-light photocatalytics of ZnO. Adapted with permission from [24]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g002
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g003 550
Figure 3. Diagram indicating the introduction of new energy levels inside the band gap of ZnO. Adapted with permission from [25]. Copyright 2019, KeAi Publishing.
Figure 3. Diagram indicating the introduction of new energy levels inside the band gap of ZnO. Adapted with permission from [25]. Copyright 2019, KeAi Publishing.
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g003
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Total density of state and (b) electronic band structure of pure ZnO reproduced from [29].
Figure 4. (a) Total density of state and (b) electronic band structure of pure ZnO reproduced from [29].
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g004
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematics of the photoexcitation of the dye followed by its photocatalytic degradation under solar irradiation.
Figure 5. Schematics of the photoexcitation of the dye followed by its photocatalytic degradation under solar irradiation.
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g005
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g006 550
Figure 6. Mechanism of antibacterial and photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanorods. Adapted with permission from [43]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
Figure 6. Mechanism of antibacterial and photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanorods. Adapted with permission from [43]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g006
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Room temperature PL spectra of samples synthesized by electrolytes containing different concentrations of Ag+. (b) UV/Vis absorption spectra of bare ZnO and Ag-ZnO submicrometer rods. Adapted with permission from [49]. Copyright 2019, ACS.
Figure 7. (a) Room temperature PL spectra of samples synthesized by electrolytes containing different concentrations of Ag+. (b) UV/Vis absorption spectra of bare ZnO and Ag-ZnO submicrometer rods. Adapted with permission from [49]. Copyright 2019, ACS.
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g007
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g008 550
Figure 8. Photodegradation of methyl orange with pure ZnO and doped ZnO with 5% Co, 10% Co, and 15% Co. Adapted with permission from [56]. Copyright 2019, ACS.
Figure 8. Photodegradation of methyl orange with pure ZnO and doped ZnO with 5% Co, 10% Co, and 15% Co. Adapted with permission from [56]. Copyright 2019, ACS.
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g008
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g009 550
Figure 9. XRD spectra of synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles using (A) olive leaves, (B) chamomile flower, and (C) red tomato fruit [88].
Figure 9. XRD spectra of synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles using (A) olive leaves, (B) chamomile flower, and (C) red tomato fruit [88].
Nanomaterials 12 00486 g009
Table
Table 1. Percentage degradation of various dyes using doped ZnO photocatalysts.
Table 1. Percentage degradation of various dyes using doped ZnO photocatalysts.
Sr. No.Doped ZnOPollutants % DegradationLight SourceReferences
1.Sn/ZnOMethyl blue dye81150 W Xe lamp[68]
2.La/ZnOMethyl orange dye85.86Visible light[69]
3.Ir/ZnOMalachite green>909 W fluorescent visible lamp[70]
4.Sr/ZnOMethylene blue50500 W Xe lamp[71]
5.V/ZnOMalachite green>99Osram Lumilux daylight lamp[72]
6.Co/ZnOMethylene blue98% 500 W halogen lamp[73]
7.Cu/ZnODirect blue 15 dye70Visible light[74]
8.Ag/ZnOCibacron brilliant yellow 3G-B65400 mW·cm−2 Xe lamp[75]
9.Al/ZnONaphthol green B10025 W·cm−2 sunlight[76]
10.Nd/ZnOCongo red93.7Visible light[77]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aftab, S.; Shabir, T.; Shah, A.; Nisar, J.; Shah, I.; Muhammad, H.; Shah, N.S. Highly Efficient Visible Light Active Doped ZnO Photocatalysts for the Treatment of Wastewater Contaminated with Dyes and Pathogens of Emerging Concern. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030486

AMA Style

Aftab S, Shabir T, Shah A, Nisar J, Shah I, Muhammad H, Shah NS. Highly Efficient Visible Light Active Doped ZnO Photocatalysts for the Treatment of Wastewater Contaminated with Dyes and Pathogens of Emerging Concern. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(3):486. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030486

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aftab, Saima, Tayyaba Shabir, Afzal Shah, Jan Nisar, Iltaf Shah, Haji Muhammad, and Noor S. Shah. 2022. "Highly Efficient Visible Light Active Doped ZnO Photocatalysts for the Treatment of Wastewater Contaminated with Dyes and Pathogens of Emerging Concern" Nanomaterials 12, no. 3: 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030486

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop