Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation of Ultrathin Porous Co3O4 Nanosheets by Physically Mixing with Au Nanoparticles
Next Article in Special Issue
TiO2-Coated Silicon Nanoparticle Core-Shell Structure for High-Capacity Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Effective Antibacterial/Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO Nanomaterials Synthesized under Low Temperature and Alkaline Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Anatase-to-Rutile Phase Transition in Highly Oriented Nanoparticles Array of Titania with Photocatalytic Response Changes

1
Department of Materials Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Building 73, Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow 119991, Russia
2
Department of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Building 3, Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow 119991, Russia
3
Udmurt Federal Research Center of UB RAS, T. Baramzina Str. 34, Izhevsk 426067, Russia
4
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry RAS, Leninskii Prosp. 31, Moscow 119071, Russia
5
Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii Prosp. 29, Moscow 119991, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(24), 4418; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244418
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 9 December 2022 / Published: 11 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology for Energy Conversion and Storage)

Abstract

:
An array of highly oriented anatase nanoparticles was successfully prepared from NH4TiOF3 with the assistance of polyetheleneglycol-400 at 450 °C. The study showed the stability of obtained layered TiO2-anatase close to 1200 °C. This research confirmed for the first time that the transition of mesocrystalline anatase to the rutile phase occurs between 1000 °C and 1200 °C, which is more than 400 °C higher than the transition of bulk TiO2 due to the used precursor. A small quantity of K-phase nanowhiskers, which issued after 800 °C in the composite based on TiO2, stimulated a fourfold increase in photocatalytic performance. This study offers a new approach to the construction and preparation of effective nanocrystalline photocatalyst.

1. Introduction

Titania nanoparticles are widely used in everyday products requiring photocatalytic and ion-exchange performance because of their specific surface growth and reactivity. It was found that in spite of the fact that myriad studies on TiO2-based nanomaterials have been made in recent decades, many scientists are interested in improving them further. Hence, the manipulation of phase stability and formation are essential for both researchers and industrial organizations. At room temperature and atmospheric pressure, the thermodynamically stable modification of TiO2 is rutile. Anatase and brookite can be kinetically stabilized. Single-crystal anatase irreversibly transforms into rutile at close to 600 °C in air; however, data are also available on transition temperatures in the range of 400–1200 °C due to differences in methods for determining transition temperatures, the presence of impurities, and variations in crystallite sizes. Thus, anatase mesocrystals are described in [1], which retain high stability up to 800–900 °C. The influence of impurities has also been repeatedly studied [2]. Brookite is more stable than anatase; the brookite–rutile phase transition occurs at 800 °C [2,3]. Anatase and rutile mesocrystals can exhibit higher photocatalytic activity due to their highly oriented ordered structure. In this case, it is important to have a structure with a significant proportion of (001) and (101) faces [4].
The literature describes several methods for obtaining titanium dioxide mesocrystals [5,6,7]. One of them is the annealing of NH4TiOF3 mesocrystals obtained by hydrolysis of (NH4)2TiF6 [5].
To stabilize the growth of the 001 or 101 faces, it is necessary to slow down the process of hydrolysis in other directions. To do this, non-ionic polymers, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), are introduced into the reaction mixture. Then, only partial hydrolysis of TiF62− ions proceeds with the formation of an intermediate compound NH4TiOF3, which is stable and precipitates. Further, due to the similarity of the crystal structures of NH4TiOF3 and TiO2, as a result of heat treatment, TiO2 mesocrystals can be obtained [8].
Titanium dioxide highly oriented nanoparticles arrays can also be synthesized by simple solution methods. For example, hollow spheres from rutile nanorods can be synthesized by a hydrothermal reaction using TiCl4, N,N’-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), and L-serine as biological additives [9]. Another way is to obtain anatase mesocrystals using solvothermal synthesis from (C4H9O)4Ti and acetic acid. The reaction was carried out for 24 h at 200 °C followed by annealing at 400 °C to remove organic residues [1]. Such highly porous mesocrystals can be produced in large quantities, and due to the high nanocrystallinity of the resulting material, the anatase phase is retained upon heating up to 900 °C [10].
In addition, the literature describes the preparation of anatase mesocrystals by kinetically controlled crystallization based on sol-gel synthesis. TiCl4 and n-octanol were used as reagents, and TiO2 mesocrystals in the form of a truncated bipyramid were obtained by oriented addition [10]. These particles have a large number of photoactive centers, and when irradiated with light in the visible region of the spectrum, they show high photoactivity, which exceeds the value for an industrial catalyst based on TiO2 (Degussa P25) [11].
In addition, TiO2 mesocrystals can be grown on substrates. For example, researchers [10] developed a method for synthesizing anatase mesocrystals on multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs). CNTs were dispersed into an aqueous solution of TiF4, kept in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min, and then heated for 20 h at 60 °C. Nanotubes are coated with petal-shaped TiO2 particles, which consist of crystallites 2–4 nm in size. Metallic Ti can be used as a substrate, then rutile nanorods are synthesized in an aqueous solution of (C4H9O)4Ti and HCl at 150 °C for 20 h, while they are elongated along the [001] direction [10].
An analysis of the literature has shown that by now there are a significant number of experimental works devoted to the study of the photocatalytic properties of titanium dioxide, including the methods of its synthesis in the form of mesocrystals. Despite the amount of data available, interest in TiO2-based materials continues unabated, partly due to the search for affordable environmental cleanup materials. Furthermore, the thermal stability of anatase mesocrystals has not been yet reported.
In this study, preparation of photoactive oriented nanomaterials based on titanium dioxide and nonionic polymer was explored. Herein, we have presented a strategy to improve photocatalytic response of TiO2 composite.
The temperature limit of stability of an array of highly oriented anatase nanoparticles was confirmed, and the temperature of phase transition of titanium dioxide mesocrystals from anatase to rutile was determined for the first time.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

(NH4)2TiF6, H3BO3 and PEG 400 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, UK). All chemicals were used without further purification.

2.2. Precursor (NH4TiOF3) Formation

First, NH4TiOF3 was synthesized via slow hydrolysis. The starting chemicals (NH4)2TiF6 (0.594 g) and H3BO3 (0.372 g) in the stoichiometric molar ratio 1:2 were mixed well with distilled water (30 mL) under stirring to form solution. After this, the PEG400 (9 g) solution was slowly added to prepared mixture under constant stirring. The viscous solution was kept at 35 °C for 20 h. The final products were collected by centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 7 min and then washed using H2O and acetone for three cycles. After drying at air sample NH4TiOF3 was obtained.

2.3. Mesocrystall and Layered Composites Formation

Obtained precursor (powder) were calcined in a muffle at certain temperatures (450, 600, 800, 1000 and 1200 °C) for 2 h at air atmosphere.

2.4. Analytics

The phase analysis was determined via X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray Diffractometer (Bruker, Germany). The morphology of the samples at all synthetic stages were recorded on scanning electron microscope Carl Zeiss NVision 40 (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an INCA analyzer Oxford Instruments X-Max (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK). Raman spectroscopy was conducted using a Renishaw inVia Reflex spectrometer (Renishaw, UK) with an illumination wavelength of 633 nm. Thermogravimetric and thermocalorimetric analysis was carried out using a Simultaneous Thermo Analysis Netzsch STA 409 PC Luxx (Netzsch-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany). Heating was conducted from room temperature to 1200 °C with a heating rate increase of 5 °C min−1 at air and argon. MS gas analysis was conducted at all temperature ranges. BET low-temperature nitrogen adsorption measurements were performed using an ATX-6 analyzer (Katakon, Novosibirsk, Russia). Measurements of photocatalytic activity were conducted under irradiation of a suspension of the analyte MC (1.5 mg MC in 2 mL H2O) in 40 µL aqueous solution of crystal violet (1 mM) in a quartz cuvette with an Ocean Optics HPX-2000 (Orlando, FL, USA) deuterium—halogen lamp (the output power is 1.52 mW, as measured in the 200–1100 nm range by an integrated optical power meter) in a cell thermostated at 37 °C. Spectrophotometric analysis was performed using an Ocean Optics QE65000 spectrometer (Orlando, FL, USA). All samples were kept in the dark for 45 min prior to conducting the degradation study. The chemical analysis was performed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a SPECS spectrometer (SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH, Berlin, Berlin) with Mg Kα excitation (1253.6 eV).
Single-crystal data were collected at the ID28 diffraction side station of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, equipped with a PILATUS3 X 1M detector mounted on the rotating arm of a Euler goniostat [12]. In all cases the size of the focal spot was less than 50 mkm; wavelengths of 0.784 Å were employed in combination with different detector angles to ensure sufficient angular coverage. Single-crystal data were collected from isolated crystals of typical size ~5 × 5 × 1 µm3 mounted on glass fiber (Araldite Rapid epoxy). Dataset combined two subsets of 1440 images collected with 0.25 deg step in shutterless mode for two different angles of detector. CBF files were transformed to ESPERANTO format and treated by CrysAlis v38.41 software. High-resolution reciprocal space maps were produced by locally developed software of ID28 beamline. Images were binned by SNBL Tool Box software and integrated with the Dioptas program. Powder data refinement was carried out using FullProf.

3. Results

The structure, orientation and morphology of obtained NH4TiOF3 particles were investigated by XRD (including high resolution XRD) and SEM. Figure 1a shows the XRD diffraction pattern fully identical to [13]. The position and intensity of the reflections confirm the formation of single-phase crystalline NH4TiOF3. The shape of the obtained particles was established SEM: they are octagonal prisms with a base diameter of 3.8–5.6 µm and a thickness of 1.5–2.5 µm (Figure 1b). Figure 1c,d show the results of high-resolution X-ray diffraction of the precursor carried out on an individual macroparticle. The point diffraction pattern with intense ordered reflections confirms that the (001) axis of the crystallographic structure of NH4TiOF3 is coaxial with the normal to the base of the macroparticle prism.
In order to determine the optimal annealing temperature of the NH4TiOF3 precursor (PEG 400) to obtain anatase mesocrystals and study the processes of its transformations upon heating, thermal analysis with mass spectrometry was carried out (Figure 2).
Regarding the hypothesized reactions of the thermal decomposition of the precursor [8] and the obtained experimental data, an optimal temperature of 450 °C was chosen for the synthesis of anatase mesocrystals. To obtain TiO2 mesocrystals, the precursor obtained in the presence of PEG400 was annealed at 450 °C for 2 h in air. Figure 3a shows the X-ray pattern of the obtained substance, which confirms the complete conversion of NH4TiOF3 into crystalline titanium dioxide in the form of anatase without impurities. The Raman spectrum confirms the presence of the corresponding anatase phase (Figure 3b).
According to scanning electron microscopy (Figure 4) and X-ray diffraction for one single TiO2 microparticle (Figure S1, see Supplementary Materials), it was found that all anatase nanoparticles are rectangular plates 30–50 nm in size, substantially co-oriented in the (001) plane. This is indicated by the high-resolution XRD patterns of the HK0 and the H0L reciprocal space layers close to the point one (Figure S1a,b). The crystallographic axes of titanium dioxide (100) and (010) are aligned with the diagonals of the nanoparticle array. According to nitrogen adsorption data, the specific surface area for the obtained samples after evaluation via the BET model was 10.4 ± 5.0 m2/g.
It is known that the anatase–rutile phase transition temperature in a bulk crystal is close to 600 °C [14]. To determine the thermal stability of anatase in the form of mesocrystals, the NH4TiOF3 precursor synthesized using PEG 400 was annealed in air for 2 h at different temperatures: 600 °C, 800 °C, 1000 °C, and 1200 °C. According to the X-ray pattern (Figure 3a), anatase remained the only phase of TiO2 up to 1000 °C, while the X-ray diffraction pattern of sample annealed at 1200 °C contained only reflections of the rutile phase. Thus, the anatase–rutile phase transition in mesocrystals occurs in the temperature range 1000 °C–1200 °C, which is over 400 °C higher than transition of bulk TiO2 [14]. The increased thermal stability of the anatase phase can be explained by stabilization by fluorine anions, which remained in a small amount after heat treatment from NH4TiOF3. This effect is related to the high Ti–F binding energy, and, according to [15], the phase transition in anatase nanoparticles begins at a temperature of 900 °C. In our work, the mesocrystalline anatase phase is preserved in its pure form up to 1000 °C, and the phase transition occurs completely in the temperature range of 1000–1200 °C, which is higher than the available literature data [2]. The lattice constants for the sample annealed after 1200 °C (rutile TiO2) were evaluated as a = 4.5954(5) Å and c = 2.9599(8) Å, while the TiO2 derived from other material derived from precursor without fluorium demonstrate a = 4.591 Å and c = 2.957 Å [16]. The lattice parameters of TiO2 rutile phases were almost the same. It should be noted that the lattice parameters for mesocrystalline anatase differed from those for TiO2 obtained from precursor without fluorium: a = 3.791(1) Å vs. 3.785 Å and c = 9.48(0) Å vs. 9.514 Å [16]. It has been implicitly proved that fluorine can disappear after high-temperature anneal. The XPS analysis showed the presence of around 5–6% F in the nanoparticles of anatase obtained by annealing at 450 °C while there was an absence of F in the powder after 1200 °C heat treatment (Figure S2, see Supplementary Materials). It was assumed that the F remaining in the structure would hinder the phase transition, but XPS failed to detect F for the samples annealed at temperatures of 1000 and 1200 °C. Probably, the amount of residual fluorine was below the threshold value for determining the composition of fluorine by this method (that is, below 1–3%). At the same time, the heat of the anatase–rutile phase transition was not high enough, and according to DSC data (Figure 2), it is difficult to determine the temperature range in which this transformation occurs for mesocrystals [2]. The increased stability of the anatase phase in highly oriented nanoparticle array can also be explained by the presence of residues of a rigid polymer matrix, which hinders the phase transition.
On both diffraction patterns and Raman spectra of the samples after annealing at temperatures of 800, 1000 and 1200 °C, an impurity was observed, identified as potassium hexatitanate K2Ti6O13 [17,18,19] (Figure 3b). The microstructure of the powders obtained after annealing at temperatures of 600, 800, 1000 and 1200 °C was studied by scanning electron microscopy (Figure 5). According to the micrographs, the shape of the aggregates was retained after annealing at 1000 °C. After heat treatment at 1200 °C, the geometry of the macroparticles was disturbed: the crystallites coarsened, which is typical for the transformation from anatase to rutile phase. The micrographs also showed a small amount of nanowhiskers, presumably of the K2Ti6O13 phase. A similar result had been obtained earlier in the synthesis of anatase mesocrystals in a PEG 6000 matrix after annealing at a temperature of 500 °C [20]. This component was formed as a result of potassium diffusion between the TiO2 layers, which was confirmed by the growth of nanowires along the (100) and (010) planes. The formation of the TiO2–K2Ti6O13 hybrid material with different morphologies was presumably due to the presence of potassium in the PEG 400 polymer matrix. TiO2 is a well-known ion-change nanomaterial [21]. The presence of potassium in the samples was confirmed by EDX (Figure S3, see Supplementary Materials). K/Ti ratio was about 0.027.
All obtained samples were photoactive. A commercial TiO2 photocatalyst, Degussa P25, was used as a reference sample (Figure S4, see Supplementary Materials and Table 1). A high photoactivity was established for a titanium dioxide nanomaterial obtained after annealing at 800 °C. The obtained indicators of photocatalytic activity (PCA) of the samples can be explained by the influence of two factors.
On the one hand, the appearance of the potassium hexatitanate (K2Ti6O13) phase significantly increased the photoactivity response. Thus, the PCA of mesocrystals after annealing at 800 °C was 4.4 times higher than after annealing at 450 °C. A number of works [15,18,22,23] present data on the high photocatalytic activity of K2Ti6O13. It was also shown that the photoactivity of the TiO2–K2Ti4O9 hybrid material was almost two times higher than that of pure TiO2 [24]. As for synthesis, the formation of K2Ti6O13 from TiO2 required temperatures above 800 °C or a long duration of synthesis [25,26,27,28], while the formation of the TiO2–K2Ti6O13 hybrid material in mesocrystals occurred upon heating for 8 h at a temperature of 500 °C [20]. On the other hand, according to micrographs (Figure 5), it was found that the highly oriented nanostructure of TiO2 began to destroy at 1000 °C, and after annealing at 1200 °C. The XRD and Raman spectroscopy data (Figure 3) make it possible to unambiguously conclude that there is a rutile phase in the powder, which has a lower photocatalyst [29].

4. Conclusions

In summary, preparation of photoactive oriented nanomaterials based on titanium dioxide and nonionic polymer was successfully realized. The study demonstrated the stability of obtained layered TiO2-anatase close to 1200 °C. This research for the first time verified that the transition of the mesocrystalline anatase to rutile phase occurs between 1000 °C and 1200 °C, which is over 400 °C higher than transition of bulk TiO2 due to the used precursors. A small amount of K-phase nanowhiskers, which was issued after 800 °C in the TiO2-based composite, stimulated the enhancement of the photocatalytic performance four times. This capability offers a new approach to constructing composite Ti-O layered materials and provides strong potential for the resulting nanomaterial for application in catalysis and electrode materials.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12244418/s1, Figure S1: the HK0 and the H0L reciprocal space layers of an individual crystal of TiO2 obtained after 2 h at 450 °C, respectively. Data were collected at the Swiss-Norwegian beamline BM01 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble, France; Figure S2: XPS spectra of F1s for titanium dioxide after 450 and 1200 °C; Figure S3: EDX spectra of TiO2 obtained after annealing of NH4TiOF3 (PEG 400) at 1000 °C; Figure S4: Crystal violet dye photodecomposition rates in the presence of various samples of titanium dioxide (after 450, 600, 800, 1000 and 1200 °C heat treatment and reference—Evonik Aeroxide® TiO2 P25.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.B.; methodology, O.B.; validation, O.B. and A.S.; formal analysis, A.B., T.S. and A.E.; investigation, O.B., A.S., T.S., A.E. and A.B.; resources, O.B.; data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, O.B.; visualization, I.Z. and A.T.; supervision, O.B.; project administration, O.B.; funding acquisition, O.B. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the RSF grant (project # 22-29-00963).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Some parts of the experiments were carried out using the scientific equipment purchased by M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University Program of Development. We also acknowledge the core shared research facilities “Surface and Novel Materials” of Udmurt Federal Research Center of UB RAS for XPS investigations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ye, J.; Liu, W.; Cai, J.; Chen, S.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, H.; Qi, L. Nanoporous Anatase TiO2 Mesocrystals: Additive-Free Synthesis, Remarkable Crystalline-Phase Stability, and Improved Lithium Insertion Behavior. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hanaor, D.A.H.; Sorrell, C.C. Review of the Anatase to Rutile Phase Transformation. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 855–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Islam, S.; Rahman, R.A.; Riaz, S.; Naseem, S.; Ottoman, Z. Formation of Rutile Titania Phase at Low Temperature. Mater. Today Proc. 2015, 2, 5298–5301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gong, X.Q.; Selloni, A. Reactivity of Anatase TiO2 Nanoparticles: The Role of the Minority (001) Surface. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 19560–19562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schmitt, R.H.; Grove, E.L.; Brown, R.D. The Equivalent Conductance of the Hexafluorocomplexes of Group IV (Si, Ge, Sn, Ti, Zr, Hf). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 5292–5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moriguchi, I.; Sonoda, K.; Matsuo, K.; Kagawa, S.; Teraoka, Y. Oriented Growth of Thin Films of Titanium Oxyfluoride at the Interface of an Air/Water Monolayer. Chem. Commun. 2001, 15, 1344–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Deki, S.; Aoi, Y.; Asaoka, Y.; Kajinami, A.; Mizuhata, M. Monitoring the Growth of Titanium Oxide Thin Films by the Liquid-Phase Deposition Method with a Quartz Crystal Microbalance. J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 733–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, L.; Smyth-Boyle, D.; O’Brien, P. A Facile Synthesis of Uniform NH4TiOF3 Mesocrystals and Their Conversion to TiO2 Mesocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1309–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, S.J.; Gong, J.Y.; Hu, B.; Yu, S.H. Mesocrystals of Rutile TiO2: Mesoscale Transformation, Crystallization, and Growth by a Biologic Molecules-Assisted Hydrothermal Process. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jinguang, C.; Limin, Q. TiO2 Mesocrystals: Synthesis, Formation Mechanisms and Applications. Sci. China Chem. 2012, 55, 2318–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Da Silva, R.O.; Gonalves, R.H.; Stroppa, D.G.; Ramirez, A.J.; Leite, E.R. Synthesis of Recrystallized Anatase TiO2 Mesocrystals with Wulff Shape Assisted by Oriented Attachment. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 1910–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Dyadkin, V.; Pattison, P.; Dmitriev, V.; Chernyshov, D. A New Multipurpose Diffractometer PILATUS@ SNBL. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2016, 23, 825–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boytsova, O.; Dovgaliuk, I.; Chernyshov, D.; Eliseev, A.; O’Brien, P.; Sutherland, A.J.; Bosak, A. Polar and non-polar structures of NH4TiOF3. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2019, 52, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Murray, J.L.; Wriedt, H.A. The O-Ti (Oxygen-Titanium) System. J. Phase Equilibria 1987, 8, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Garay-Rodríguez, L.F.; Torres-Martínez, L.M. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction over A2Ti6O13 (A=Na and K) Titanates Synthesized by Different PH-Catalyzed Sol–Gel. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2020, 93, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hummer, D.R.; Heaney, P.J.; Post, J.E. Thermal Expansion of Anatase and Rutile between 300 and 575 K Using Synchrotron Powder X-Ray Diffraction. Powder Diffr. 2007, 22, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bamberger, C.E.; Begun, G.M.; MacDougall, C.S. Raman Spectroscopy of Potassium Titanates. Their Synthesis, Hydrolytic Reactions, and Thermal Stability. Appl. Spectrosc. 1990, 44, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Q.; Guo, Z.; Chung, J.S. Formation and Structural Characterization of Potassium Titanates and the Potassium Ion Exchange Property. Mater. Res. Bull. 2009, 44, 1973–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frank, O.; Zukalova, M.; Laskova, B.; Kürti, J.; Koltai, J.; Kavan, L. Raman Spectra of Titanium Dioxide (Anatase, Rutile) with Identified Oxygen Isotopes (16, 17, 18). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 14567–14572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sadovnikov, A.A.; Garshev, A.V.; Eliseev, A.A.; Beltiukov, A.N.; Naranov, E.R.; Li, W.; Sutherland, A.J.; Boytsova, O.V. Nanowhiskers of K2Ti6O13 as a Promoter of Photocatalysis in Anatase Mesocrystals. Catal. Today 2021, 378, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Boytsova, O.V.; Drozhzhin, O.A.; Petukhov, D.I.; Chumakova, A.V.; Sobol, A.G.; Beltyukov, A.N.; Eliseev, A.A.; Bosak, A.B. One-Step Synthesis of Vanadium-Doped Anatase Mesocrystals for Li-Ion Battery Anodes. Nanotechnology 2021, 33, 055603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; Wang, H.; Qi, Y.; Cui, C. Enhanced Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Activities of K2Ti6O13 Nanowires Induced by Copper Doping. Crystals 2020, 10, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Q.; Guo, Q.; Li, B. Low temperature synthesis and characterization of substitutional Na-modified K2Ti6O13 nanobelts with improved photocatalytic activity under UV irradiation. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 66086–66095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, S.; Wu, C.; Yan, Y.; Deng, Y. Study on Preparation and Performances of TiO2/Potassium Titanate Photocatalyst. In Proceedings of the 2008 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai, China, 16–18 May 2008; pp. 2853–2856. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bao, N.; Shen, L.; Feng, X.; Lu, X. High Quality and Yield in Potassium Titanate Whiskers Synthesized by Calcination from Hydrous Titania. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 87, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, G.H.; Chen, Q.; Han, P.D.; Yu, Y.; Peng, L.-M. Potassium Titanate Nanowires: Structure, Growth, and Optical Properties. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 035323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Choy, J.-H.; Han, Y.-S. A Combinative Flux Evaporation–Slow Cooling Route to Potassium Titanate Fibres. Mater. Lett. 1998, 34, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, T.; Chen, Q.; Peng, L.-M. Hydrothermal Reaction Mechanism and Pathway for the Formation of K2Ti6O13 Nanowires. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 3018–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luttrell, T.; Halpegamage, S.; Tao, J.; Kramer, A.; Sutter, E.; Batzill, M. Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile?-Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of NH4TiOF3 precursor. (b) SEM micrographs of NH4TiOF3 mesocrystals formed in the presence of PEG-400. Scale bars are 1 µm. (c,d) images showing the HK0 and the H0L reciprocal space layers of an individual crystal of NH4TiOF3, respectively. Data were collected at the Swiss-Norwegian beamline BM01 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble, France.
Figure 1. (a) Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of NH4TiOF3 precursor. (b) SEM micrographs of NH4TiOF3 mesocrystals formed in the presence of PEG-400. Scale bars are 1 µm. (c,d) images showing the HK0 and the H0L reciprocal space layers of an individual crystal of NH4TiOF3, respectively. Data were collected at the Swiss-Norwegian beamline BM01 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble, France.
Nanomaterials 12 04418 g001
Figure 2. TGA-MS analysis of NH4TiOF3 at air atmosphere.
Figure 2. TGA-MS analysis of NH4TiOF3 at air atmosphere.
Nanomaterials 12 04418 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD Patterns and (b) Raman spectra of TiO2 obtained by heat treatment of ammonium oxofluorotitanate after 450, 600, 800, 1000 and 1200 °C for 2 h. Phases identity as K2Ti6O13 (PDF #13-0447), anatase TiO2 (PDF #21-1272), TiO2 rutile (PDF #21-1276).
Figure 3. (a) XRD Patterns and (b) Raman spectra of TiO2 obtained by heat treatment of ammonium oxofluorotitanate after 450, 600, 800, 1000 and 1200 °C for 2 h. Phases identity as K2Ti6O13 (PDF #13-0447), anatase TiO2 (PDF #21-1272), TiO2 rutile (PDF #21-1276).
Nanomaterials 12 04418 g003
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrographs of a sample of TiO2 mesocrystals generated from a sample of NH4TiOF3 by heating under argon at 450 °C for 2 h: (a) showing porous layered structure of a collection of mesocrystals (white scale bar = 1 µm) and (b) an expanded image of a single TiO2 mesocrystal showing individual component nanoparticle building blocks comprising the mesocrystal (white scale bar = 200 nm).
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrographs of a sample of TiO2 mesocrystals generated from a sample of NH4TiOF3 by heating under argon at 450 °C for 2 h: (a) showing porous layered structure of a collection of mesocrystals (white scale bar = 1 µm) and (b) an expanded image of a single TiO2 mesocrystal showing individual component nanoparticle building blocks comprising the mesocrystal (white scale bar = 200 nm).
Nanomaterials 12 04418 g004
Figure 5. Scanning electron micrographs of a sample of TiO2 mesocrystals generated from a sample of NH4TiOF3 by heating under air (a) at 600 °C, (b) at 800 °C, (c) at 1000 °C and (d) at 1200 °C (white scale bar = 1 µm).
Figure 5. Scanning electron micrographs of a sample of TiO2 mesocrystals generated from a sample of NH4TiOF3 by heating under air (a) at 600 °C, (b) at 800 °C, (c) at 1000 °C and (d) at 1200 °C (white scale bar = 1 µm).
Nanomaterials 12 04418 g005
Table 1. Phase content and photoactivity under UV of the obtained powders and commercial TiO2.
Table 1. Phase content and photoactivity under UV of the obtained powders and commercial TiO2.
SchemePhase ContentPhotocatalytic Activity
TiO2 after 450 °Canatase0.11%/min
TiO2 after 600 °Canatase0.21%/min
TiO2 after 800 °Canatase + K-phase0.48%/min
TiO2 after 1000 °Canatase + K-phase0.20%/min
TiO2 after 1200 °Crutile + K-phase0.02%/min
P25 (commercial)anatase + rutile0.63%/min
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boytsova, O.; Zhukova, I.; Tatarenko, A.; Shatalova, T.; Beiltiukov, A.; Eliseev, A.; Sadovnikov, A. The Anatase-to-Rutile Phase Transition in Highly Oriented Nanoparticles Array of Titania with Photocatalytic Response Changes. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4418. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244418

AMA Style

Boytsova O, Zhukova I, Tatarenko A, Shatalova T, Beiltiukov A, Eliseev A, Sadovnikov A. The Anatase-to-Rutile Phase Transition in Highly Oriented Nanoparticles Array of Titania with Photocatalytic Response Changes. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(24):4418. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boytsova, Olga, Irina Zhukova, Artem Tatarenko, Tatiana Shatalova, Artemii Beiltiukov, Andrei Eliseev, and Alexey Sadovnikov. 2022. "The Anatase-to-Rutile Phase Transition in Highly Oriented Nanoparticles Array of Titania with Photocatalytic Response Changes" Nanomaterials 12, no. 24: 4418. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244418

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop