Next Article in Journal
Sunlight-Powered Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction Catalysed by Plasmonic Au/TiO2 Nanocatalysts: Effects of Au Particle Size on the Activity and Selectivity
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Copper Nanostructures for Non-Enzymatic Glucose Sensors via Direct-Current Magnetron Sputtering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dielectric Strength of Nanofluid-Impregnated Transformer Solid Insulation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/nano12234152
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanically Strong and Electrically Conductive Polyethylene Oxide/Few-Layer Graphene/Cellulose Nanofibrils Nanocomposite Films

by
Mei Li
1,
Meijie Xiao
1,
Qunhao Wang
1,
Jian Zhang
1,
Xiaolin Xue
1,
Jiangqi Zhao
1,
Wei Zhang
1,2,* and
Canhui Lu
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Polymer Research Institute at Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
2
Advanced Polymer Materials Research Center of Sichuan University, Shishi 362700, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(23), 4152; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234152
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 23 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multifunctional Nanocellulose Structures for Environmental and Energy Research)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, a cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs)/few-layer graphene (FLG) hybrid is mechanically stripped from bamboo pulp and expanded graphene (EG) using a grinder. This strategy is scalable and environmentally friendly for high-efficiency exfoliation and dispersion of graphene in an aqueous medium. The in situ-generated CNFs play a key role in this process, acting as a “green” dispersant. Next, the obtained CNFs-FLG is used as a functional filler in a polyoxyethylene (PEO) matrix. When the composition of CNFs-FLG is 50 wt.%, the resultant PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite film exhibits a Young’s modulus of 1.8 GPa and a tensile strength of 25.7 MPa, showing 480% and 260% enhancement as compared to those of the pure PEO film, respectively. Remarkably, the incorporation of CNFs-FLG also provides the nanocomposite films with a stunning electrical conductivity (72.6 S/m). These attractive features make PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite films a promising candidate for future electronic devices.

1. Introduction

Carbon nanofillers, such as graphene, carbon nanotubes and carbon black [1,2,3], have been widely applied in polymer nanocomposites due to their special structure, thermal stability, electrochemical stability and excellent mechanical properties. In particular, the 2D nanocarbon of graphene has shown great promise in the preparation of high-performance polymer nanocomposites thanks to its extraordinary properties, such as a high electrical conductivity of ~106 S cm−1 and a high modulus of ~100 GPa [4,5]. Meanwhile, improvement in the physicochemical properties of graphene nanocomposites depends on the distribution of graphene in the polymer matrix as well as interfacial bonding between the filler and the polymer matrix. However, conventional graphene-based nanocomposites usually suffer from the poor dispersion of graphene in the matrix owing to the strong tendency of graphene to form agglomerates [6]. To tackle this problem, various methods have been developed, including surface modification [7], incorporation of organic salts to assist dispersion [8] and so on. Currently, there are several approaches to preparing graphene, including chemical vapor deposition [9], arc discharge [10] and chemical conversion [11]. Among them, chemical oxidation/reduction of different carbon sources (e.g., graphite oxide [12], expandable graphite (EG) [13] and sieved graphite powder [14]) is one of the most commonly practiced methods. However, this method exhibits some obvious drawbacks which greatly limit application on a large scale. For example, the chemical reaction destroys the electron clouds of graphene, which reduces its inherent conductivity. Moreover, the use of concentrated acid and toxic chemicals increases the handling risk and health hazard.
Liquid phase exfoliation (LPE) [15] is a physical method capable of peeling off graphene directly from graphite powder. Compared with the chemical methods, LPE has advantages of simplicity, high efficiency, low cost and environmental friendliness. More importantly, the graphene prepared by LPE usually has fewer defects in its structure, which is highly desired for many end-uses. In addition, because water is an economic and “green” solvent, great research efforts have been devoted to LPE of graphene using water as the liquid medium. However, the surface energy mismatch between water and graphene always results in aggregation and restacking of the graphene sheets. Consequently, various stabilizers, such as aromatic compounds [16], surfactants [17] and polymers [18], have been applied, aimed at addressing this issue.
Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) extracted from plant fibers are nanofibrous materials with diameters in the range of 1 to 100 nm and lengths of several microns [19]. They have been proved to be an outstanding reinforcing filler for polymer composites with many other unique properties, such as low density, small size, renewability, biodegradability, high specific surface area, good biocompatibility and mechanical properties [20,21]. Specifically, the presence of -OH and -CH on their molecular chains makes them both hydrophilic and hydrophobic [22]. This amphiphilic property of CNFs has been frequently utilized to stabilize various nanoparticles [23,24], preventing their agglomeration and restacking in an aqueous medium [25]. It is envisaged that during a wet co-milling process of cellulose and graphite, both CNFs and graphene can be simultaneously peeled off from their precursors. Meanwhile, the CNFs and graphene interact with each other through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic–hydrophobic interaction [26], giving rise to a stable CNFs/graphene aqueous dispersion. In addition, the obtained hybrid nanofiller might synergistically reinforce polymer composites because of its excellent mechanical properties.
Polyoxyethylene (PEO) is a thermoplastic and water-soluble polymer with excellent biocompatibility, which is particularly attractive in coating [27], polyelectrolytes for energy harvesting and storage [28,29,30], etc. However, neat PEO materials intrinsically exhibit low mechanical performance and poor electrical conductivity. The incorporation of conductive filler to fabricate strong and conductive PEO composites will certainly broaden the application fields of PEO. For example, conductive PEO composites can be used for various sensing applications, such as humidity sensors [31], H2S gas sensors [32], toluene sensors [33,34] and acetone and ethanol sensors [35]. In addition, they also show promise in electrocatalysts, electromagnetic shielding, flexible electronics and so on [36,37,38,39].
Herein, we demonstrate a facile and scalable strategy to fabricate strong and conductive PEO nanocomposite films. First, hybrid CNFs/few-layer graphene (FLG) nanofillers with stable dispersion in water were prepared from bamboo pulp fibers and EG via wet co-milling in a grinder. Subsequently, the nanofillers were blended with a PEO solution to produce PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite films. In this composite system, both the dispersion of graphene and the interfacial compatibility between filler and polymer matrix could be effectively improved. Furthermore, the effects of CNFs-FLG loading on the thermal, mechanical and electrical properties of the PEO nanocomposite films were comprehensively investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Never-dried Moso bamboo pulp with a solid content of 25% was supplied by Yongfeng Paper Co., Ltd., Muchuan, China. Expandable graphene ((EG), KP251) was provided by ADT Carbonic Material Factory (Shijiazhuang, China) with a particle size of 50 mesh, a density of 2.05 g/cm3 and an onset exfoliation temperature of 150 °C. Polyethylene oxide ((PEO), viscosity-average molecular weight = 600,000) was purchased from Kelong Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.

2.2. Preparation of CNFs-FLG Hybrid Nanofillers

The CNFs-FLG hybrid nanofillers were fabricated as follows. First, EG was expanded by microwave irradiation at 350 W for 20 s to obtain vermiform EG particles, following the literature [40]. Then, the water dispersion with a solid concentration of 1 wt.% and a weight ratio of bamboo pulp: EG = 5:5 was mechanically stirred for 12 h. After that, they were subjected to a superfine grinding machine (MKCA6-2, MasukoSangyo Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan) at 1500 rpm to produce a CNFs-FLG dispersion, which was denoted as CNFs: FLG = 5:5. The clearance between the upper and lower disks was set at −10 μm, −50 μm and −100 μm. The suspension was treated for 10 cycles at each clearance sequentially.

2.3. Preparation of PEO/CNFs-FLG Composite Films

First, PEO was dissolved in deionized water at 80 °C to obtain a PEO solution with a concentration of 2 wt.%. Next, the solution was cooled to 60 °C and the CNFs-FLG dispersion (5:5 in weight) with a solid concentration of 1 wt.% was gradually added and mechanically stirred for 6 h. Finally, the PEO/CNFs-FLG mixture was poured into a polystyrene dish and placed in an oven at a temperature of 60 °C for 48 h to obtain the PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films. The compositions of the mixtures are provided in Table 1. The resultant PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films with different CNFs-FLG content were designated as PEO/CNFs-FLG 0%, PEO/CNFs-FLG 10%, PEO/CNFs-FLG 30%, PEO/CNFs-FLG 50% and PEO/CNFs-FLG 80% according to the addition of CNFs-FLG.

2.4. Characterization

The microscopic morphology of the CNFs-FLG sample was observed by optical microscope (UB200i; Oupu Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China). To prepare the sample, the CNFs-FLG aqueous dispersion was diluted and dropped on a glass slide, which was then covered with a coverslip to spread the dispersion evenly.
The morphologies of fractured samples were observed by scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JEOL JSM-7500F, Tokyo, Japan) at 20 kV after sputtering a thin Au coating onto the sample surface. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (NICOLET 6700, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to characterize the chemical composition of CNFs-FLG. In addition, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEOL JEM-100CX, Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze their micromorphology.
Mechanical properties were assessed by a universal material testing machine (INSTRON 5966, INSTRON, MA, USA) with a loading rate of 10 mm/min according to the standard GB/T1040-92. The samples were cut into strips with a width of 1 mm and length of 3 mm, while the thickness of the samples was measured by a thickness gauge. For each composite film, 5 parallel samples were tested, and the average value was presented. The resistance of the PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films were measured with a KDB-1 resistivity/box resistance tester (Guangzhou Kunde Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) and the copper electrodes were linearly arranged. For each composite film, 10 points on the sample surface were randomly tested, and the average value was presented. The conductivity (σ) was calculated as follows:
ρ = Rs/t
σ = 1/ρ
where ρ is resistivity; Rs is square resistance; and t is the thickness of the film.
The melting behavior of the PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite was recorded with a DSC204F1 differential scanning calorimeter (NETZSCH, Bavarian Asia, Germany). A sample of 5–10 mg was accurately weighed and placed into a crucible. The DSC curve was recorded from 30 °C to 150 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. All samples were dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h before testing. The sample crystallinity (X) was calculated according to the following formula:
X   ( % ) = Δ H f   Δ H f 0   ×   100 %
where ΔHf is the melting enthalpy of the system; ΔHf0 is the melting enthalpy for 100% PEO crystal—its value is 231.7 J/g; and W is the content of CNFs-ELG in the composite.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Stability of CNFs-FLG Aqueous Suspension

The CNFs-FLG hybrid fillers were prepared by the wet co-milling of bamboo pulp and EG. As shown in the inset of Figure 1a, the CNFs-FLG aqueous dispersion demonstrated excellent stability even after 48 h of resting, and no noticeable aggregation was observed (Figure 1a,b). The FTIR spectra (Figure 1c) showed that the characteristic absorption for the -OH stretching vibration shifted to a lower wavenumber (from 3346 cm−1 to 3336 cm−1), suggesting that the -OH groups on CNFs could form hydrogen bonding with the oxygen-containing groups at the edge of defective FLG [41]. The synergistic effects of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic–hydrophobic interaction between the CNFs and FLG made them highly dispersed in the aqueous medium, effectively hindering the agglomeration and restacking of the FLG [20,41]. The SEM image in Figure 2a shows that the EG had a porous worm-like structure. A magnified SEM image for the “worm” is provided in Figure 2b, in which the graphene layers can be distinguished. For the CNFs-FLG sample, the CNFs wrapped and adhered well to the FLG surface (Figure 2c). Moreover, the transparent graphite sheets could be clearly observed in TEM images (Figure 2d), indicating that the EG had been exfoliated to thin sheets during the wet co-milling [41]. Accordingly, a schematic diagram is provided in Figure 1d, showing the CNFs-FLG structure and their interactions.

3.2. Morphology of PEO/CNFs-FLG Nanocomposite Films

The fracture morphologies of PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite films with different CNFs-FLG content were visualized by SEM. The pure PEO film (Figure 3a) displayed a comparatively smooth fracture morphology with some microcracks due to the nature of PEO [42]. After blending with the CNFs-FLG filler, a layered structure could be observed (Figure 3b), indicating that the CNFs-FLG was uniformly distributed in the PEO matrix. However, with an increase in the proportion of CNFs-FLG nanofiller in the PEO, some obvious agglomeration was observed (Figure 3c,d). As indicated by the green arrows in Figure 3d, the CNFs coupled with the PEO could effectively wrap the FLG. Notably, it is possible for the hydroxyl groups on CNFs to form hydrogen bonding with the ether oxygen on PEO [43], which could improve the compatibility between PEO and CNFs-FLG.

3.3. Thermal Analysis

The DSC curves of the PEO/CNFs-FLG composites with different CNFs-FLG filler content are shown in Figure 4. The melting point (Tm), melting enthalpy (ΔHf) and crystallinity (X) were calculated, and the results are provided in Table 2. The melting point of the pure PEO was 72.3 °C, and its crystallinity was 84.6%. With the increase in CNFs-FLG content, both the melting point and the crystallinity of PEO decreased. This is because the CNFs-FLG hybrid fillers were dispersed in the PEO matrix and a large proportion of the -OH on the CNFs and of the -OH and -COOH on the FLG could form strong interfacial bonding with the oxygen-containing groups of the PEO through hydrogen bonding. This hindered the ordered arrangement of PEO molecular chains in the crystallization process [43], resulting in the decrease in crystallinity.

3.4. Mechanical Properties

Figure 5 compares the mechanical properties of the PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite films with different CNFs-FLG content. As shown in Figure 5a, when the content of CNFs-FLG nanofillers was 50 wt.%, the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the composite were 25.7 MPa and 1804.7 MPa, 2.6 and 4.8 times higher than those of pure PEO, respectively. Such remarkable reinforcement might be explained from two aspects. On one hand, both CNFs and FLG themselves have excellent mechanical properties and have been well utilized as reinforcing fillers [41]. On the other hand, the CNFs and FLG were bonded by hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction, while a large number of hydroxyl groups exposed on the CNFs could interact with the -O- group on the PEO molecules through hydrogen bonding, giving rise to an effective stress transfer at the interface. Therefore, when the material was deformed (e.g., subjected to stretching), the external force could be effectively transferred to the strong CNFs and FLG via the hydrogen bonds, giving rise to enhanced mechanical properties. However, when the CNFs-FLG content was too high (PEO/CNF-FLG 80%), the CNFs-FLG fillers tended to agglomerate in the polymer matrix, which formed structural defects. In the meantime, the hydrogen bonding also became limited with lower PEO content. Therefore, the tensile strength of the film showed a slight decrease.
It should be noted that the addition of CNFs-FLG reduced the elongation at break of the composite films (Figure 5b). Nonetheless, they all exhibited excellent flexibility and foldability. As demonstrated in Figure 6, all the composite films could be easily twisted or folded without any cracking.

3.5. Electrical Conductivity

The electrical conductivity of the various PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films was measured according to Equations (1) and (2), and the results are shown in Figure 7. The pure PEO film did not conduct electricity at all. When the CNFs-FLG content was 10 wt.%, the conductivity of the composite film was only 0.12 S/m, which is in the category of non-conductive materials. With the increase in CNFs-FLG content, the conductivity of the composite film was significantly improved. This is normal as the electrical conductivity is mainly governed by the content of conductive filler. A high loading of conductive filler helps to form a more complete conductive network inside the composite. These results agreed well with LED lamp lighting tests. As shown in Figure 7b, a green LED lamp was connected with the composite film and a power supply to form a circuit. When the CNFs-FLG content was 0 or 10 wt.%, the LED lamp did not light up. With the increase in CNFs-FLG content, the brightness of the LED lamp gradually increased, suggesting an improved conductive network with higher FLG additions. When the CNFs-FLG filler content was 80 wt.% (FLG only was 40 wt.%), the conductivity of the composite film reached its highest level of 72.6 S/m.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a facile and effective strategy was developed for the preparation of highly dispersed FLG in water and the production of strong and conductive PEO composite films with the obtained filler. Wet co-milling of bamboo pulp and EG was verified to be quite effective in simultaneously peeling off CNFs and FLG from their precursors. The resultant CNFs were crucial for the dispersion of the in situ-generated FLG in water owing to their hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic–hydrophobic interactions. When the obtained CNFs-FLG suspension was added to a PEO solution to make PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films, remarkably improved properties were realized. The tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the PEO/CNFs-FLG 50% composite film were 2.6 and 4.8 times those of pure PEO, respectively. Additionally, with the incorporation of FLG, the electrical conductivity of the PEO/CNFs-FLG films also sharply increased. Due to the excellent mechanical and electrical properties, we foresee that PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films may find broad applications in sensor, supercapacitor and electromagnetic shielding materials and so on.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L. and M.X.; data curation, Q.W.; formal analysis, M.L., M.X. and J.Z. (Jian Zhang); funding acquisition, J.Z. (Jiangqi Zhao), W.Z. and C.L.; investigation, M.L.; methodology, M.L. and M.X.; project administration, W.Z. and C.L.; resources, X.X.; software, M.L. and Q.W.; supervision, C.L.; validation, M.L., M.X. and W.Z.; visualization, M.L.; writing—original draft, M.L. and M.X.; writing—review and editing, W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51861165203), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2020YJ0261 and 2022JDRC0089), the State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering (sklpme2019-2-19), the Program for Featured Directions of Engineering Multidisciplines of Sichuan University [2020SCUNG203] and the Joint Project for the Talent Innovation Sharing Alliance of Quanzhou [2021C064L].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within this article. Further inquiries may be directed to the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J.; Jin, X.; Li, C.; Wang, W.; Wu, H.; Guo, S. Graphene and graphene derivatives toughening polymers: Toward high toughness and strength. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 370, 831–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arduini, F.; Cinti, S.; Mazzaracchio, V.; Scognamiglio, V.; Amine, A.; Moscone, D. Carbon black as an outstanding and affordable nanomaterial for electrochemical (bio)sensor design. Biosens. Bioelectr. 2020, 156, 0956–5663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jin, L.; Zeng, Z.; Kuddannaya, S.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z. Biocompatible, Free-Standing Film Composed of Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers-Graphene Composite. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tarannum, F.; Danayat, S.S.; Nayal, A.; Muthaiah, R.; Annam, R.S.; Garg, J. Large Enhancement in Thermal Conductivity of Solvent-Cast Expanded Graphite/Polyetherimide Composites. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yan, T.; Zhang, H.; Huang, D.; Feng, S.; Fujita, M.; Gao, X.-D. Chitosan-Functionalized Graphene Oxide as a Potential Immunoadjuvant. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Johnson, D.W.; Dobson, B.P.; Coleman, K.S. A manufacturing perspective on graphene dispersions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 20, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Aram, E.; Ehsani, M.; Ithonakdar, H.A.; Jafari, S.H.; Nouri, N.R. Functionalization of Graphene Nanosheets and Its Dispersion in PMMA/PEO Blend: Thermal, Electrical, Morphological and Rheological Analyses. Fibers Polym. 2016, 17, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jagtap, S.B.; Kushwaha, R.K.; Ratna, D. Novel green method of preparation of a poly (ethylene oxide)/graphene nanocomposite using organic salt assisted dispersion. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 30555–30563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reina, A.; Jia, X.; Ho, J.; Nezich, D.; Son, H.; Bulovic, V.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Kong, J. Layer Area, Few-Layer Graphene Films on Arbitrary Substrates by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Subrahmanyam, K.S.; Panchakarla, L.S.; Govindaraj, A.; Rao, C.N.R. Simple Method of Preparing Graphene Flakes by an Arc-Discharge Method. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4257–4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zheng, X.; Xu, Q.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Wei, J. High-throughput, direct exfoliation of graphite to graphene via a cooperation of supercritical CO2 and pyrene-polymers. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 10632–10638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dong, L.; Yang, J.; Chhowalla, M.; Loh, K.P. Synthesis and reduction of large sized graphene oxide sheets. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7306–7316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yan, Q.-L.; Gozin, M.; Zhao, F.-Q.; Cohen, A.; Pang, S.-P. Highly energetic compositions based on functionalized carbon nanomaterials. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 4799–4851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Al-Saygh, A.; Ponnamma, D.; AlMaadeed, M.A.; Vijayan, P.P.; Karim, A.; Hassan, M.K. Flexible Pressure Sensor Based on PVDF Nanocomposites Containing Reduced Graphene Oxide- Titania Hybrid Nanolayers. Polymers 2017, 9, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lotya, M.; Hernandez, Y.; King, P.J.; Smith, R.J.; Nicolosi, V.; Karlsson, L.S.; Blighe, F.M.; De, S.; Wang, Z.; McGovern, I.T.; et al. Liquid Phase Production of Graphene by Exfoliation of Graphite in Surfactant/Water Solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3611–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Shboul, A.A.; Trudeau, C.; Cloutier, S.; Siaj, M.; Claverie, J.P. Graphene dispersions in alkanes: Toward fast drying conducting inks. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 9893–9901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ciesielski, A.; Samori, P. Graphene via sonication assisted liquid-phase exfoliation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 381–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Achary, L.S.K.; Kumar, A.; Barik, B.; Nayak, P.S.; Tripathy, N.; Kar, J.P.; Dash, P. Reduced graphene oxide-CuFe2O4 nanocomposite: A highly sensitive room temperature NH3 gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 272, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Im, W.; Park, S.Y.; Goo, S.; Yook, S.; Lee, H.L.; Yang, G.; Youn, H.J. Incorporation of CNF with Different Charge Property into PVP Hydrogel and Its Characteristics. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Shen, F.; Wan, J.; Lacey, S.; Fang, Z.; Dai, H.; Hu, L. Nanocellulose as green dispersant for two-dimensional energy materials. Nano Energy 2015, 13, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kavosi, J.; Sarikaya, S.; Creasy, T.S.; Naraghi, M. Identification of the effect of nanofiller morphology on interlaminar fracture toughness of hybrid composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2021, 55, 2899–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sakuma, W.; Fujisawa, S.; Berglund, L.A.; Saito, T. Nanocellulose Xerogel as Template for Transparent, Thick, Flame-Retardant Polymer Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, W.; Gong, Y.; Zhao, X.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, F.; Fuo, Q. Strong and Highly Conductive Graphene Composite Film Based on the Nanocellulose-Assisted Dispersion of Expanded Graphite and Incorporation of Poly(ethylene oxide). ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 5045–5056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hajian, A.; Lindstrom, S.B.; Pettersson, T.; Hamedi, M.M.; Wagberg, L. Understanding the Dispersive Action of Nanocellulose for Carbon Nanomaterials. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 1439–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, T.; Huang, R.; Chai, S.; Chen, F.; Fu, Q. Completely Green Approach for the Preparation of Strong and Highly Conductive Graphene Composite Film by Using Nanocellulose as Dispersing Agent and Mechanical Compression. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 9102–9113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. de Ruig, L.T.; Haer, T.; de Moel, H.; Brody, S.D.; Botzen, W.J.W.; Czajkowski, J.; Aerts, J.C.J.H. How the USA can benefit from risk-based premiums combined with flood protection. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12, 995–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, X.; Fu, J.; Ma, D.; Ma, C.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, Z. Effect of nano h-BN particles on growth regularity and tribological behavior of PEO composite ceramic coating of ZL109 alloy. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Siccardi, S.; Amici, J.; Colombi, S.; Carvalho, J.T.; Versaci, D.; Quartarone, E.; Pereira, L.; Bella, F.; Francia, C.; Bodoardo, S. UV-cured self-healing gel polymer electrolyte toward safer room temperature lithium metal batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 433, 141265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Bataineh, Q.M.; Ahmad, A.A.; Alsaad, A.M.; Migdadi, A.B.; Telfah, A. Correlation of electrical, thermal, and crystal parameters of complex composite films based on polyethylene oxide (PEO) doped by copper sulfate (CuSO4) br. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2022, 645, 414224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bella, F.; Ozzello, E.D.; Sacco, A.; Bianco, S.; Bongiovanni, R. Polymer electrolytes for dye-sensitized solar cells prepared by photopolymerization of PEG-based oligomers. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 3036–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, L.; Wang, M.; Liu, Z.; Guan, J.; Li, T.; Zhang, D. High-performance humidity sensor based on graphitic carbon nitride/polyethylene oxide and construction of sensor array for non-contact humidity detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 344, 130219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mousavi, S.; Kang, K.; Park, J.; Park, I. A room temperature hydrogen sulfide gas sensor based on electrospun polyaniline-polyethylene oxide nanofibers directly written on flexible substrates. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 104131–104138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Su, Y.; Xie, G.; Chen, J.; Du, H.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, Z.; Ye, Z.; Du, X.; Taia, H.; Jiang, Y. Reduced graphene oxide-polyethylene oxide hybrid films for toluene sensing at room temperature. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 97840–97847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Xie, G.; Du, X.; Tai, H. Gas sensors based on multiple-walled carbon nanotubes-polyethylene oxide films for toluene vapor detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 191, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Daneshkhah, A.; Shrestha, S.; Siegel, A.; Varahramyan, K.; Agarwal, M. Cross-Selectivity Enhancement of Poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene)-Based Sensor Arrays for Detecting Acetone and Ethanol. Sensors 2017, 17, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sheng, J.; Zhou, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, X. Crystallization Behavior of Poly(ethylene oxide) in Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Array. Langmuir 2018, 34, 3678–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, J.; Huang, W.; Liu, D.; Sun, J.; Zhu, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, S. Formation and reduction of hydrogen-bonded graphene oxide-poly(ethylene oxide) complex fiber. Mater. Today Commun. 2019, 19, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fei, H.-F.; Long, Y.; Yu, H.-J.; Yavitt, B.M.; Fan, W.; Ribbe, A.; Watkins, J.J. Bimodal Mesoporous Carbon Spheres with Small and Ultra-Large Pores Fabricated Using Amphiphilic Brush Block Copolymer Micelle Templates. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 57322–57329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guo, R.; Jiao, T.F.; Li, R.F.; Chen, Y.; Guo, W.C.; Zhang, L.X.; Zhou, J.X.; Zhang, Q.R.; Peng, Q.M. Sandwiched Fe3O4/Carboxylate Graphene Oxide Nanostructures Constructed by Layer-by-Layer Assembly for Highly Efficient and Magnetically Recyclable Dye Removal. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1279–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, K.; Tian, J.-H.; Cui, L.; Lin, N.; Shan, Z.-Q. Preparation and Characterization of Graphene and Platinum/Graphene. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 28, 1541–1546. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, X.; Lu, Z.; Zhao, J.; Li, Q.; Zhang, W.; Lu, C. Exfoliation/dispersion of low-temperature expandable graphite in nanocellulose matrix by wet co-milling. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 1434–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, H.; Keum, J.K.; Hiltner, A.; Baer, E.; Freeman, B.; Rozanski, A.; Galeski, A. Confined Crystallization of Polyethylene Oxide in Nanolayer Assemblies. Science 2009, 323, 757–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fukuya, M.N.; Senoo, K.; Kotera, M.; Yoshimoto, M.; Sakata, O. Change in the Crystallite Orientation of Poly(ethylene oxide)/Cellulose Nanofiber Composite Films. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 4411–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g001 550
Figure 1. (a,b) Optical microscope images of CNFs-FLG. The inset is a digital photo of CNFs-FLG aqueous dispersion after 48 h resting; (c) FTIR spectra of FLG, CNFs and CNFs-FLG; (d) Schematic diagram of CNFs-FLG structure.
Figure 1. (a,b) Optical microscope images of CNFs-FLG. The inset is a digital photo of CNFs-FLG aqueous dispersion after 48 h resting; (c) FTIR spectra of FLG, CNFs and CNFs-FLG; (d) Schematic diagram of CNFs-FLG structure.
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g001
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g002 550
Figure 2. (a,b) SEM images of EG; (c) SEM image of CNFs-FLG; (d) TEM image of CNFs-FLG. The green and yellow arrows indicate CNFs and FLG, respectively.
Figure 2. (a,b) SEM images of EG; (c) SEM image of CNFs-FLG; (d) TEM image of CNFs-FLG. The green and yellow arrows indicate CNFs and FLG, respectively.
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g002
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) SEM image of the cross section of PEO/CNF-FLG 0%; (b) SEM image of the cross section of PEO/CNF-FLG 50%; (c) SEM image of the cross section of PEO/CNF-FLG 80%; (d) SEM image of the cross section of PEO/CNF-FLG 80% at high magnification. The green arrows indicate CNFs.
Figure 3. (a) SEM image of the cross section of PEO/CNF-FLG 0%; (b) SEM image of the cross section of PEO/CNF-FLG 50%; (c) SEM image of the cross section of PEO/CNF-FLG 80%; (d) SEM image of the cross section of PEO/CNF-FLG 80% at high magnification. The green arrows indicate CNFs.
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g003
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g004 550
Figure 4. DSC curves of various PEO/CNFs-FLG composites.
Figure 4. DSC curves of various PEO/CNFs-FLG composites.
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g004
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Tensile strength and Young’s modulus of PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite films; (b) Stress-strain curves of PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite films.
Figure 5. (a) Tensile strength and Young’s modulus of PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite films; (b) Stress-strain curves of PEO/CNFs-FLG nanocomposite films.
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g005
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g006 550
Figure 6. Digital photos of PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films under different deformations: flat (a); twist (b); fold (c).
Figure 6. Digital photos of PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films under different deformations: flat (a); twist (b); fold (c).
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g006
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Electrical conductivity of various PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films; (b) Lighting experiment with green LED.
Figure 7. (a) Electrical conductivity of various PEO/CNFs-FLG composite films; (b) Lighting experiment with green LED.
Nanomaterials 12 04152 g007
Table
Table 1. Formulation of PEO/CNFs-FLG composites.
Table 1. Formulation of PEO/CNFs-FLG composites.
SamplesPEO (g)Water (g)CNFs-FLG (g)CNFs-FLG Dispersion (g, 1wt.%)
PEO/CNFs-FLG 0%15000
PEO/CNFs-FLG 10%0.9450.110
PEO/CNFs-FLG 30%0.7350.330
PEO/CNFs-FLG 50%0.5250.550
PEO/CNFs-FLG 80%0.2100.880
Table
Table 2. Tm, ΔHf and degree of crystallinity for various PEO/CNF-FLG composites.
Table 2. Tm, ΔHf and degree of crystallinity for various PEO/CNF-FLG composites.
SamplesTm (°C)ΔHf (J/g)X (%)
PEO/CNFs-FLG 0%72.3180.784.6
PEO/CNFs-FLG 10%72.8143.374.5
PEO/CNFs-FLG 30%70.495.263.6
PEO/CNFs-FLG 50%69.857.954.2
PEO/CNFs-FLG 80%66.525.659.9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, M.; Xiao, M.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Xue, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Lu, C. Mechanically Strong and Electrically Conductive Polyethylene Oxide/Few-Layer Graphene/Cellulose Nanofibrils Nanocomposite Films. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4152. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234152

AMA Style

Li M, Xiao M, Wang Q, Zhang J, Xue X, Zhao J, Zhang W, Lu C. Mechanically Strong and Electrically Conductive Polyethylene Oxide/Few-Layer Graphene/Cellulose Nanofibrils Nanocomposite Films. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(23):4152. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Mei, Meijie Xiao, Qunhao Wang, Jian Zhang, Xiaolin Xue, Jiangqi Zhao, Wei Zhang, and Canhui Lu. 2022. "Mechanically Strong and Electrically Conductive Polyethylene Oxide/Few-Layer Graphene/Cellulose Nanofibrils Nanocomposite Films" Nanomaterials 12, no. 23: 4152. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234152

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop