Next Article in Journal
Strained Si0.2Ge0.8/Ge multilayer Stacks Epitaxially Grown on a Low-/High-Temperature Ge Buffer Layer and Selective Wet-Etching of Germanium
Previous Article in Journal
Flexible Nanocellulose/Lignosulfonates Ion-Conducting Separators for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrospun Cadmium Selenide Nanoparticles-Loaded Cellulose Acetate Fibers for Solar Thermal Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Electrospun Nanomaterials: Applications in Food, Environmental Remediation, and Bioengineering

Institute of Research, Development and Innovation in Biotechnology of Elche (IDiBE), Miguel Hernández University (UMH), 03202 Elche, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(9), 1714; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091714
Submission received: 24 August 2020 / Revised: 28 August 2020 / Accepted: 28 August 2020 / Published: 29 August 2020
Among the large number of methods to fabricate nanofibers, electrospinning stands out because of its simplicity and versatility. The formation of nanoscaled fibers via electrospinning is based on the application of high voltage (usually ranging from 1 to 30 kV) to generate an electrostatic field that induces the formation and stretching of a jet from a viscoelastic polymer solution or melt. The nanofibers are finally formed by either evaporation of solvent or freezing of the melt. Regarding the setup, one of the electrodes can be placed either directly in this solution, or onto the metal needle attached to the tip of the syringe feeding the solution at a constant and controllable flux by means of an infusion pump. The other electrode is connected to a metal object that can work as collector (that can be covered by a fabric), usually a static plane surface that is located perpendicular and at a certain distance from the spinneret. As a result of the forces involved, a highly electrified continuous jet is ejected from the pendent drop of solution at the top of the spinneret and deposited on the collector as randomly distributed nanofibers. In addition, by modifying the basic setup of electrospinning and/or the composition of the electrospinnable solution, the morphology (including porosity), diameter and functionality of the final outcome can be controlled. For instance, nanofibers can even be aligned by adapting the collector to a rotary cylinder or disposed in a core/shell structure by using a spinneret with two coaxial capillaries supplying two solutions separately [1,2,3,4].
The origin of this method, which allows the efficient obtention of long, uniform nanofibers with either solid or hollow interiors, dates back to the beginning of the 20th century, when some essential technical milestones for its development, such as the generation and manipulation of electricity, were reached. However, a series of other preceding scientific advances paved the way towards this invention, which can be considered as a variant of the electrospraying process (i.e., the collapse of liquid jets into droplets by the effect) [3,4,5]. Among them, the distortion and attraction of liquid droplets when applying electrostatic forces, reported by William Gilbert in 1600, could be considered as the oldest one. In the middle of the 18th century, George Mathias Bose described the generation of aerosols by the application of high electric potentials to fluids, and Giovanni Battista Beccaria observed that when fluids were charged, they evaporated faster. Such discoveries might be considered as the basis for the development of electrospraying. It was not until the verge of 19th century that John William Strutt (Lord Rayleigh) first observed the electrospinning phenomena, and Charles Vernon Boys first designed and constructed an electrospinning device and drew fibers from a number of melts, mostly molten waxes. It was in 1900 and 1902 when John Francis Cooley and William James Morton, respectively, filed the first electrospinning patents on industrial applications, and a bit later when John Zeleny studied in detail the mechanisms underlying the process (mostly electrospraying). The origin of electrospinning was established with broad consensus in 1934, when Anton Formhals started patenting several inventions on the technology associated to this process. After up to 22 patents in about 10 years, Formhals greatly improved the process and made electrospinning an efficient and viable technique.
Later, the work of Sir Geoffrey Ingram Taylor in the 1960s, whose fundamental studies on the jet forming process laid the theory groundwork for electrospinning, is of note. Since then, the conical shape of the jet occurring as a consequence of the distortion of the spinneret droplet when the electrostatic forces exceed its surface tension has been referenced as the “Taylor cone” in later literature [6]. More recently, Larrondo and Manley in the early 1980s, and the Reneker’s group in the early 1990s, notably revitalized this technology by demonstrating the possibility of electrospinning a range of molten polymers [7] and organic polymer solutions [8,9], respectively. Reneker also popularized the term “electrospinning”, which derives from the former “electrostatic spinning” used until then. In the last decades, the advances in the fabrication, processing, and characterization of electrospun nanofibers have contributed to the wide expansion of this technique across laboratories and industry. This growth is mainly promoted by the surging interest in nanotechnology and the great expectations placed on the unique properties of nanomaterials, with notable support from the outstanding progress of the materials and polymer sciences in recent times [4].
As for the raw materials used for electrospun nanofibers, polymers comprise an unlimited number of molecules with different properties that can even be endowed with extra specific features by means of feasible functionalization protocols. In addition, electrospun nanofibers can be prepared from not only single/pure polymer sources, but also compatible polymer blends to combine the properties of their moieties [10]. Altogether, this family of compounds guarantee an extraordinary diversity of nanofiber compositions and thus properties, which explains the broad application potential of these nanomaterials. Indeed, depending on their specific composition/properties, electrospun nanofibers can be exploited in multiple applications covering areas as different as nanoelectronics, energy storage, catalyst substrates, sensors, nanofilters, protective and smart clothing, and adsorbent and biomedical materials [11,12,13,14,15].
At this point, and regardless of the application, it is worth mentioning that the assessment of the environmental impact of the nanomaterials used, as well as their fabrication and degradation by-products, is critical to avoid possible harmful effects on ecosystems by allowing, for instance, the design of appropriate disposal protocols for these compounds and to preferentially opt for those that are eco-friendly. In this sense, polymers also offer a large collection of both natural, but also synthetic, electrospinnable compounds that are non-toxic and biodegradable, as well as biocompatible [4,10]. Electrospun nanofibers made of such biomaterials are thus suitable for applications involving direct (and indirect) contact with biological systems, which mostly comprise applications within the biomedical [1,4,11,13,16,17,18,19], but also the environmental protection [11,16] and the food packaging fields [11,20,21].
The present book compiles the Special Issue “Electrospun Nanomaterials: Applications in Food, Environmental Remediation, and Bioengineering” from the journal “Nanomaterials”, and, therefore, it comprises several review and research articles addressing several applications of electrospun nanofibers in these areas. In regard to the application of these nanomaterials to the food field, the implementation of electrospinning in food packaging is thoroughly revised in Zhao et al. (2020) [22], which also includes a summary of the additional characteristics provided by functional food packaging materials, degradability, superhydrophobicity, edibility, antibacterial activity and high barrier protection, as well as the contribution of electrospun nanofibers to their development. In terms of environmental remediation, this topic is tackled by two research articles that converge on the green/sustainable generation of energy by improving two different applications (i.e., microbial fuel cells [23] and solar thermal techniques [24]) using electrospun nanofibers.
The current research and utilization of nanofibers mainly for biomedical applications is proportionally covered in this compilation. In this sense, the biomedical applications of electrospun nanofibers included here can be classified into two broad types: drug delivery systems and tissue scaffolds. Regarding drug delivery, polymers comprise a large number of biocompatible materials with an extraordinary versatility to be structured as different nanomaterials with drug-loading capacity. Thus, compounds with different solubility properties can be encapsulated into polymeric nanomaterials by either changing the polymer source or the nanomaterial type. Here, this is shown by Mira et al. (2020) [25] for the encapsulation of different classes of antibiotics by using two separate derivatives of poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) (PMVE/MA) that can be used (alone or in combination with other polymers such as fluorescent polyfluorenes [26,27,28]) for the fabrication of both nanoparticles [29] and electrospun nanofibers [30,31]. Polymeric nanofibers also protect loaded compounds from degradation, as described by Cruz-Salas et al. (2019) [32] for electrospun nanofibers made from agave fructans, which thermoprotect and photoprotect encapsulated β-carotene. Another advantage of polymeric nanofibers is their modifiable drug-release kinetics by means of feasible design changes to adjust their degradability or porosity for providing optimal therapeutic drug concentrations. As reported here [33,34], this property is being intensively investigated at present for the development of improved dressings, bandages or coatings with, for example, antibacterial activity. In this sense, the use of functional polymers such as chitosan (with reported protective immunomodulatory properties) is also attracting great interest, as widely reviewed by Maevskaia et al. (2020) [35].
Finally, the current great effort made by the scientific community in the development of tissue scaffolds based on electrospun nanofibers is also addressed here. The work of Miroshnichenko et al. (2019) [36] provides a representative example of the research lines in this area by reporting the cell interaction improvements when coating polycaprolactone nanofibers with covalently bonded platelet-rich plasma. Likewise, Li et al. (2019) [37] broadly review the progress in the particular area of electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride-based materials used for bone and neural tissue engineering.
In summary, the papers collected in this Special Issue entitled “Electrospun Nanomaterials: Applications in Food, Environmental Remediation, and Bioengineering” illustrate the high diversity and potential for implementation of electrospun nanofibers in these fields, including the covering of a wide number of subtopics. Undoubtably, such pieces of fundamental research will contribute to the promotion of electrospinning as the focal point in the future development of technological applications at the interface of biological systems, which promise long-term benefits for both health and the environment.

Author Contributions

Both guest editors conceived, wrote and reviewed this Editorial Letter. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, grant number MAT-2017-86805-R, and Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCI)—Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI)/Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), grant number RTI2018-101969-J-I00.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the authors who contributed to this Special Issue, as well as to the referees who notably helped to improve the quality of all submitted manuscripts. We also acknowledge the editorial staff of Nanomaterials, and especially Tina Tian, for their great support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frenot, A.; Chronakis, I.S. Polymer nanofibers assembled by electrospinning. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 8, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, D.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers: Reinventing the wheel? Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 1151–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Subbiah, T.; Bhat, G.S.; Tock, R.W.; Parameswaran, S.; Ramkumar, S.S. Electrospinning of nanofibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 96, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bhardwaj, N.; Kundu, S.C. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 325–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tucker, N.; Stanger, J.J.; Staiger, M.P.; Razzaq, H.; Hofman, K. The history of the science and technology of electrospinning from 1600 to 1995. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2012, 7, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Taylor, G.I. Electrically driven jets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1969, 313, 453–475. [Google Scholar]
  7. Larrondo, L.; St. John Manley, R. Electrostatic fiber spinning from polymer melts. I. Experimental observations on fiber formation and properties. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1981, 19, 909–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Doshi, J.; Reneker, D.H. Electrospinning process and applications of electrospun fibers. J. Electrost. 1995, 35, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reneker, D.H.; Chun, I. Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning. Nanotechnology 1996, 7, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gunn, J.; Zhang, M. Polyblend nanofibers for biomedical applications: Perspectives and challenges. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, H.; Gough, C.R.; Deng, Q.; Gu, Z.; Wang, F.; Hu, X. Recent advances in electrospun sustainable composites for biomedical, environmental, energy, and packaging applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xue, J.; Wu, T.; Dai, Y.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: Methods, materials, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5298–5415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ding, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Li, D.; Xiao, C.; Xiao, H.; Yang, H.; Zhuang, X.; Chen, X. Electrospun polymer biomaterials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 90, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ding, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Z.; Zanjanizadeh Ezazi, N.; Liu, D.; Santos, H.A. Electrospun fibrous architectures for drug delivery, tissue engineering and cancer therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1802852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barhoum, A.; Pal, K.; Rahier, H.; Uludag, H.; Kim, I.S.; Bechelany, M. Nanofibers as new-generation materials: From spinning and nano-spinning fabrication techniques to emerging applications. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 17, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thenmozhi, S.; Dharmaraj, N.; Kadirvelu, K.; Kim, H.Y. Electrospun nanofibers: New generation materials for advanced applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2017, 217, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Parham, S.; Kharazi, A.Z.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Ghayour, H.; Ismail, A.F.; Nur, H.; Berto, F. Electrospun nano-fibers for biomedical and tissue engineering applications: A comprehensive review. Materials 2020, 13, 2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Edmans, J.G.; Clitherow, K.H.; Murdoch, C.; Hatton, P.V.; Spain, S.G.; Colley, H.E. Mucoadhesive electrospun fibre-based technologies for oral medicine. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Teixeira, M.A.; Amorim, M.T.P.; Felgueiras, H.P. Poly (vinyl alcohol)-based nanofibrous electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Becerril, R.; Nerín, C.; Silva, F. Encapsulation systems for antimicrobial food packaging components: An update. Molecules 2020, 25, 1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wang, M.; Wang, K.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yu, D.-G. Electrospun environment remediation nanofibers using unspinnable liquids as the sheath fluids: A review. Polymers 2020, 12, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhao, L.; Duan, G.; Zhang, G.; Yang, H.; He, S.; Jiang, S. Electrospun functional materials toward food packaging applications: A review. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Massaglia, G.; Frascella, F.; Chiadò, A.; Sacco, A.; Marasso, S.L.; Cocuzza, M.; Pirri, C.F.; Quaglio, M. Electrospun nanofibers: From food to energy by engineered electrodes in microbial fuel cells. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Angel, N.; Vijayaraghavan, S.; Yan, F.; Kong, L. Electrospun cadmium selenide nanoparticles-loaded cellulose acetate fibers for solar thermal application. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mira, A.; Sainz-Urruela, C.; Codina, H.; Jenkins, S.I.; Rodriguez-Diaz, J.C.; Mallavia, R.; Falco, A. Physico-chemically distinct nanomaterials synthesized from derivates of a poly (anhydride) diversify the spectrum of loadable antibiotics. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kahveci, Z.; Vázquez-Guilló, R.; Mira, A.; Martinez, L.; Falcó, A.; Mallavia, R.; Mateo, C.R. Selective recognition and imaging of bacterial model membranes over mammalian ones by using cationic conjugated polyelectrolytes. Analyst 2016, 141, 6287–6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vázquez-Guilló, R.; Martínez-Tomé, M.J.; Kahveci, Z.; Torres, I.; Falco, A.; Mallavia, R.; Mateo, C.R. Synthesis and characterization of a novel green cationic polyfluorene and its potential use as a fluorescent membrane probe. Polymers 2018, 10, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Vázquez-Guilló, R.; Falco, A.; Martínez-Tomé, M.J.; Mateo, C.R.; Herrero, M.A.; Vázquez, E.; Mallavia, R. Advantageous microwave-assisted suzuki polycondensation for the synthesis of aniline-fluorene alternate copolymers as molecular model with solvent sensing properties. Polymers 2018, 10, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ruiz-Gatón, L.; Espuelas, S.; Larrañeta, E.; Reviakine, I.; Yate, L.A.; Irache, J.M. Pegylated poly (anhydride) nanoparticles for oral delivery of docetaxel. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 118, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mira, A.; Mateo, C.R.; Mallavia, R.; Falco, A. Poly (methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic acid) and ethyl monoester as building polymers for drug-loadable electrospun nanofibers. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Martínez-Ortega, L.; Mira, A.; Fernandez-Carvajal, A.; Mateo, C.R.; Mallavia, R.; Falco, A. Development of a new delivery system based on drug-loadable electrospun nanofibers for psoriasis treatment. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Cruz-Salas, C.N.; Prieto, C.; Calderón-Santoyo, M.; Lagarón, J.M.; Ragazzo-Sánchez, J.A. Micro-and nanostructures of agave fructans to stabilize compounds of high biological value via electrohydrodynamic processing. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, F.; Sun, Z.; Yin, J.; Xu, L. Preparation, characterization and properties of porous pla/peg/curcumin composite nanofibers for antibacterial application. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rebia, R.A.; Tanaka, T. Natural antibacterial reagents (centella, propolis, and hinokitiol) loaded into poly [(r)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-(r)-3-hydroxyhexanoate] composite nanofibers for biomedical applications. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Maevskaia, E.N.; Shabunin, A.S.; Dresvyanina, E.N.; Dobrovol’skaya, I.P.; Yudin, V.E.; Paneyah, M.B.; Fediuk, A.M.; Sushchinskii, P.L.; Smirnov, G.P.; Zinoviev, E.V. Influence of the introduced chitin nanofibrils on biomedical properties of chitosan-based materials. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Miroshnichenko, S.; Timofeeva, V.; Permyakova, E.; Ershov, S.; Kiryukhantsev-Korneev, P.; Dvořaková, E.; Shtansky, D.V.; Zajíčková, L.; Solovieva, A.; Manakhov, A. Plasma-coated polycaprolactone nanofibers with covalently bonded platelet-rich plasma enhance adhesion and growth of human fibroblasts. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Li, Y.; Liao, C.; Tjong, S.C. Electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride-based fibrous scaffolds with piezoelectric characteristics for bone and neural tissue engineering. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Falco, A.; Mallavia, R. Electrospun Nanomaterials: Applications in Food, Environmental Remediation, and Bioengineering. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091714

AMA Style

Falco A, Mallavia R. Electrospun Nanomaterials: Applications in Food, Environmental Remediation, and Bioengineering. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(9):1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091714

Chicago/Turabian Style

Falco, Alberto, and Ricardo Mallavia. 2020. "Electrospun Nanomaterials: Applications in Food, Environmental Remediation, and Bioengineering" Nanomaterials 10, no. 9: 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091714

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop