Next Article in Journal
Special Issue “The Ability–Personality Integration”
Previous Article in Journal
Sex Similarities and Differences in Intelligence in Children Aged Two to Eight: Analysis of SON-R 2–8 Scores
Open AccessArticle

On the Locus of the Practice Effect in Sustained Attention Tests

Department of Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032 Marburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 11 February 2019 / Revised: 29 May 2019 / Accepted: 30 May 2019 / Published: 4 June 2019
The present study set out to explore the locus of the poorly understood but frequently reported and comparatively large practice effect in sustained attention tests. Drawing on a recently proposed process model of sustained attention tests, several cognitive tasks were administered twice in order to examine which specific component of test performance benefitted from practice and to which extent. It was shown that the tasks representing the three sub-components of sustained attention tests, namely the perception of an item, the simple mental operation to solve an item, and the motor reaction to indicate a response to an item, benefitted from practice. Importantly, the largest practice gain was observed for the task that required item-solving processes in addition to perceptual and motor processes. Two additional postulated mechanisms in sustained attention tests—the deliberate shifting between items and the preprocessing of upcoming items—did not become more efficient through practice. Altogether, the present study shows that the practice effect in sustained attention tests seems to be primarily due to faster item-solving processes and, to a limited extent, due to a faster perception of the item, as well as a faster motor response. Moreover, besides the sub-components, it is likely that also the coordination of perceptual, item-solving, and motor processes benefitted from practice. Altogether, the present paper may have taken a first step towards a better understanding of the specific processes that cause the large practice gains in sustained attention tests. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustained attention; concentration; practice effects; process model; experimental test validation sustained attention; concentration; practice effects; process model; experimental test validation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Blotenberg, I.; Schmidt-Atzert, L. On the Locus of the Practice Effect in Sustained Attention Tests. J. Intell. 2019, 7, 12.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop