Next Article in Journal
Philanthropy and Human Flourishing in Patristic Theology
Next Article in Special Issue
New Representations of Religion and Belief in Schools
Previous Article in Journal
Contemplative Practice, Doxographies, and the Construction of Tibetan Buddhism: Nupchen Sangyé Yeshé and The Lamp for the Eye in Meditation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Religious Education beyond Congregational Settings
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Religions 2018, 9(11), 361; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9110361

Bad Religion as False Religion: An Empirical Study of UK Religious Education Teachers’ Essentialist Religious Discourse

1
School of Education, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
2
UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 October 2018 / Revised: 12 November 2018 / Accepted: 13 November 2018 / Published: 15 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reenvisioning Religious Education)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1507 KB, uploaded 15 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

We argue that there is a well-intentioned—yet mistaken—definitional turn within contemporary cultural discourse in which ‘true’ religion, being essentially loving and peaceful, is distinguished from ‘false’ religion. Concerned with the possibility that this discourse might be prevalent in school Religious Education (RE), we surveyed practicing RE teachers within the United Kingdom (UK) on their beliefs about religion. We wanted to see how far the surveyed teachers evidenced a strand of contemporary cultural discourse which, we argue, conceptualizes bad religion as false religion. Responses from 465 teachers to our online survey indicate that many RE teachers understand religion(s) as essentially benign or pro-social—and present it/them as such in the classroom. We argue that RE can only foster religious literacy if religions are presented as multifarious, complex, social phenomena. This cannot be predicated upon an essentialist conceptualization of harmful religion as false religion, which is inimical to understanding religion in the world today—as in times past. We conclude that this conceptualization is a barrier to UK RE meeting both its extrinsic purpose to educate, and one of its intrinsic purposes to foster tolerance and pro-social attitudes. View Full-Text
Keywords: religion; Religious Education; essentialism; UK schools; religion and schools; teacher beliefs religion; Religious Education; essentialism; UK schools; religion and schools; teacher beliefs
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Smith, D.R.; Nixon, G.; Pearce, J. Bad Religion as False Religion: An Empirical Study of UK Religious Education Teachers’ Essentialist Religious Discourse. Religions 2018, 9, 361.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Religions EISSN 2077-1444 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert Logo copyright Steve Bridenbaugh/UUA
Back to Top