Next Article in Journal
Black Lesbians to the Rescue! A Brief Correction with Implications for Womanist Christian Theology and Womanist Buddhology
Next Article in Special Issue
“A Religious Recognition of Equality”: Liberal Spirituality and the Marriage Question in America, 1835–1850
Previous Article in Journal
Namaste Theory: A Quantitative Grounded Theory on Religion and Spirituality in Mental Health Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sovereignty of the Living Individual: Emerson and James on Politics and Religion
Open AccessArticle

Transcendental Trinitarian: James Marsh, the Free Will Problem, and the American Intellectual Context of Coleridge’s Aids to Reflection

Department of History, Belhaven University, 1500 Peachtree St., Jackson, MS 39202, USA
Religions 2017, 8(9), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8090172
Received: 19 July 2017 / Accepted: 8 August 2017 / Published: 30 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transcendentalism and the Religious Experience)
Historians of American religion and Transcendentalism have long known of James Marsh as a catalyst for the Concord Transcendentalist movement. The standard narrative suggests that the Congregationalist Marsh naively imported Samuel Taylor Coleridge's Aids to Reflection (Am. ed. 1829) hoping to revivify orthodoxy in America. By providing a “Preliminary Essay” to explain Coleridge’s abstruse theology, Marsh injected Coleridge’s hijacked Kantian epistemology—with its distinction between Reason and Understanding—into American discourse. This epistemology inspired Transcendentalists such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Bronson Alcott, and it helped spark the Transcendentalists’ largely post-Christian religious convictions. This article provides a re-evaluation of Marsh’s philosophical theology by attending to the precise historical moment that Marsh chose to publish the Aids to Reflection and his “Preliminary Essay.” By the late 1820s, the philosophical problem of free will lurked in American religious discourse—Unitarian as well as Trinitarian—and Marsh sought to exploit the problem as a way to explain how aspects of Trinitarian Christianity might be rational and yet unexplainable. Attending carefully to the numerous philosophical and religious discourses of the moment—including Unitarianism, Trinitarianism, Kant, Coleridge, and Scottish Common Sense—and providing close readings of the historical philosophers Marsh engaged, this article shows how James Marsh laid the epistemological groundwork for a new romanticized Christianity that was distinct from the Concord Transcendentalists, but nonetheless part of its historical lineage. View Full-Text
Keywords: James Marsh; Transcendental; Romantic; Christianity; American religion; free will; Coleridge; Trinitarian; Unitarian; Scottish Common Sense; Kant James Marsh; Transcendental; Romantic; Christianity; American religion; free will; Coleridge; Trinitarian; Unitarian; Scottish Common Sense; Kant
MDPI and ACS Style

Koefoed, J. Transcendental Trinitarian: James Marsh, the Free Will Problem, and the American Intellectual Context of Coleridge’s Aids to Reflection. Religions 2017, 8, 172.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop