Souls in the Dark: Theodicy and Domesticity in Home
AbstractTheodicy typically addresses the problem of evil in the public square, focusing on instances of paradigmatic evil that raise the issue broadly. Theodicy, however, also operates in the private sphere, where the conflict and chaos of family life raise doubts about God’s goodness and power. Domestic suffering—here defined as the hurt, sorrows, and heartbreaks of family life, apart from domestic abuse, which belongs to a separate category—has often been neglected by theodicists. In this article, I will analyze Marilynne Robinson’s fictional novel Home for insights into the problem of evil in the domestic realm. While it does not offer a domestic theodicy per se, Robinson’s Home sheds light on the reality of suffering love and its bias toward hope, which charts new theological pathways in theodicy that have hitherto been underexplored. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Scott, M.S.M. Souls in the Dark: Theodicy and Domesticity in Home. Religions 2017, 8, 273.
Scott MSM. Souls in the Dark: Theodicy and Domesticity in Home. Religions. 2017; 8(12):273.Chicago/Turabian Style
Scott, Mark S.M. 2017. "Souls in the Dark: Theodicy and Domesticity in Home." Religions 8, no. 12: 273.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.