Correction: Huijs et al. (2024). Spirituality as a Predictor of Well-Being, Mental Distress or Both: A Four-Week Follow-Up Study in a Sample of Dutch and Belgian Adults. Religions 15: 179

In the original publication (Huijs et al. 2024), there was a mistake in Table 3. The minus sign is missing in some figures. Corrected Table 3 appears below.

Table 3. The table shows the results of the stepwise hierarchical regression analysis for Hypothesis 1.

	Step 1	Step 2	Step 3	Step 4
	β	β	β	β
	R2 = 0.22 **	R2 = 0.36 ** ΔR2 = 0.14	R2 = 0.67 ** ΔR2 = 0.31	R2 = 0.68 ** ΔR2 = 0.01
Gender 1	0.01	−0.01	0.02	0.02
Age	−0.05	−0.10 *	−0.03	−0.04
Relation 2	0.01	0.02	0.00	0.00
Paid job 3	0.10 *	0.07	0.03	0.03
Education 4	−0.04	0.00	0.01	0.02
Home living child 5	−0.03	−0.05	−0.01	−0.02
Spirituality T1	0.48 **	0.39 **	0.04	0.04
Mental distress T1		−0.38 **		−0.12 **
Well-being T1			0.80 **	0.74 **

¹ 1 = woman; ² 1 = none; ³ Regardless of hours; ⁴ scientific = higher vocational education, bachelor’s degree, master’s degree, or postdoctoral degree; ⁵ kids, yes = at least one minor living at home (i.e., child). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; R² = R square; β = standardized regression coefficient.

Table 3. The table shows the results of the stepwise hierarchical regression analysis for Hypothesis 1.

	Step 1	Step 2	Step 3	Step 4
	β	β	β	β
	R2 = 0.22 **	R2 = 0.36 ** ΔR2 = 0.14	R2 = 0.67 ** ΔR2 = 0.31	R2 = 0.68 ** ΔR2 = 0.01
Gender 1	0.01	−0.01	0.02	0.02
Age	−0.05	−0.10 *	−0.03	−0.04
Relation 2	0.01	0.02	0.00	0.00
Paid job 3	0.10 *	0.07	0.03	0.03
Education 4	−0.04	0.00	0.01	0.02
Home living child 5	−0.03	−0.05	−0.01	−0.02
Spirituality T1	0.48 **	0.39 **	0.04	0.04
Mental distress T1		−0.38 **		−0.12 **
Well-being T1			0.80 **	0.74 **

¹ 1 = woman; ² 1 = none; ³ Regardless of hours; ⁴ scientific = higher vocational education, bachelor’s degree, master’s degree, or postdoctoral degree; ⁵ kids, yes = at least one minor living at home (i.e., child). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; R² = R square; β = standardized regression coefficient.

In the original publication (Huijs et al. 2024), there was a mistake in Table 5. The minus sign is missing in some figures. Corrected Table 5 appears below.

Table 5. The table shows the results of the stepwise hierarchical regression analysis for Hypothesis 2.

	Step 1	Step 2	Step 3	Step 4
	β	β	β	β
	R2 = 0.09 **	R2 = 0.23 ** ΔR2 = 0.14	R2 = 0.70 ** ΔR2 = 0.47	R2 = 0.70 ** ΔR2 = 0.00
Gender 1	−0.10 *	−0.11 **	−0.02 **	−0.02
Age	−0.18 **	−0.18 **	−0.08 *	−0.08 **
Relation 2	0.04	0.06	0.01	0.01
Paid job 3	−0.09	−0.05	−0.01	−0.00
Education 4	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.01
Home living child 5	−0.08	−0.10 *	−0.05	−0.06 *
Spirituality T1	−0.20 **	0.03	−0.01	0.03
Well-being T1		−0.44 **		−0.09 **
Mental distress T1			0.81 **	0.78 **

¹ 1 = woman; ² 1 = none; ³ Regardless of hours; ⁴ Education, scientific = higher vocational education, bachelor’s degree, master’s degree, or postdoctoral degree; ⁵ kids, yes = at least one minor living at home (i.e., child). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. β standardized regression coefficient.

Table 5. The table shows the results of the stepwise hierarchical regression analysis for Hypothesis 2.

	Step 1	Step 2	Step 3	Step 4
	β	β	β	β
	R2 = 0.09 **	R2 = 0.23 ** ΔR2 = 0.14	R2 = 0.70 ** ΔR2 = 0.47	R2 = 0.70 ** ΔR2 = 0.00
Gender 1	−0.10 *	−0.11 **	−0.02 **	−0.02
Age	−0.18 **	−0.18 **	−0.08 *	−0.08 **
Relation 2	0.04	0.06	0.01	0.01
Paid job 3	−0.09	−0.05	−0.01	−0.00
Education 4	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.01
Home living child 5	−0.08	−0.10 *	−0.05	−0.06 *
Spirituality T1	−0.20 **	0.03	−0.01	0.03
Well-being T1		−0.44 **		−0.09 **
Mental distress T1			0.81 **	0.78 **

¹ 1 = woman; ² 1 = none; ³ Regardless of hours; ⁴ Education, scientific = higher vocational education, bachelor’s degree, master’s degree, or postdoctoral degree; ⁵ kids, yes = at least one minor living at home (i.e., child). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. β standardized regression coefficient.

The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.