Abstract
Among the early medieval authors, Amalarius of Metz (8th–9th century) is one of those who discussed the impact of religious music and song on the body and soul. In his main work: the Liber Officialis, listening and singing liturgical music are depicted as having a corporeal effect that generates sensations of an intense sensory and emotional character. In Amalarius, living the musical religious phenomenon not only coincides with the idea that music can evoke emotions but there is something that goes further. What Amalarius emphasizes is a particular emotion: a “spiritual state” of the nakedness of the heart, almost a weakness of those who are capable of tears and sensitive to God’s voice. During the patristic era, especially in the East, “penthos” (compunction) was used to describe the experience of tears in prayer or meditation; however, Fathers of the Church described liturgical music as an obstacle to compunction. For this reason, an evolution of that compunctory doctrine emerges from the exposition of Amalarius. In this context, it is not a question of crying for one’s sins but of exploiting a natural power (vis) of music. By simply listening to music, a person would seem capable of being moved and reaching a particularly “receptive state” to welcome the Word of God and make it bear fruit. What Amalarius describes in religious music seems to be the natural experience that one feels when, just listening to a melody, a tear spontaneously falls. This physical reaction is connected to a spiritual transformation that seems to pass through the flesh (carnalia) of our humanity. The result of this singular experience, strongly connected to musical ethics, is the conversion to good action and the possibility to dispose human beings to attentive, deep, and fruitful listening.
Keywords:
music; emotions; compunction; liturgy; Middle Ages; Gregorian chant; Amalarius; Boethius; philosophy of music 1. Introduction
This paper aims to study the value of Gregorian chant within the liturgy according to the exposition of an early medieval author: Amalarius of Metz. An attempt is made to contextualize and analyze how this author became the authority for presenting the ratio (rationale) and the necessity of listening to a musical moment within the celebration as well as the possibility of emphasizing certain characteristics peculiar to Gregorian chant. Amalarius’s contributions were made known primarily by means of his liturgical exposition on the gradual responsory contained in the Liber Officialis and the Hellenistic philosophical reflection on the natural force of music, arrived at in the Middle Ages by reading the Latin translations of Boethius and his reception of those doctrines.
2. Materials and Methods
The applied method is analytical with a focus on ad fontes (the sources). The text of Amalarius and the authors, directly or indirectly cited, are read and explored in their original context and in their subsequent reception and application.
3. Amalarius and His Liber Officialis
Amalarius of Metz was a bishop and intellectual belonging to the second generation1 of the Carolingian Renaissance (; ). He lived in Gaul, in the heart of the empire (), in the late 8th and early 9th centuries, and his life exemplifies the life of an intellectual in this period of history2. His name, traditionally but without certain historical evidence (), has been associated with the city of Metz that, from the 8th century, "became the most famous Carolingian centre for the cultivation of Roman music, even giving its name to certain melodies composed by the Franks" ().
In addition to his ecclesial duties, first in the administration of the Trier region as metropolitan () and later of the diocese of Lyons, Amalarius played a significant role in many areas of social and political life in the historical period of the late 8th and early 9th centuries. He was an imperial ambassador to the East in Constantinople (; ) along with his friend, the abbot Peter of Nonantola3. He was a traveler with a passion for learning about the sources of the subjects he studied, a canonist and organizer of community religious life4, a theologian, and an author of prose and poetry.
Among his many interests, however, one especially stands out: liturgy. Amalarius seemed moved by both a pastoral zeal and an intellectual passion that led him to describe, explain, and research not only “how” one should celebrate, but especially the “why” of the many elements that populated the rite in his time (). This led him to draft his main work: the Liber Officialis5 (). It is a liturgical commentary, an expositio missae6, which also uses the rhetorical technique of allegoresis (; ) through the fourfold sense of Scripture (). It could almost be considered an early medieval liturgical phenomenology animated by catechetical pedagogy (), which is characteristic of early medieval spirituality ().
The work, in addition to the author’s passion, is the result of a necessity born from what the liturgy in Gaul was experiencing in the era inaugurated by Charlemagne. It was with this emperor that the “Roman” liturgy, imposed throughout the Carolingian empire (), was born. It is called “Roman” but it is the result of the meeting of the liturgical tradition of Rome () with that of the ancient Franks (West Germanic culture) and, for this reason, we can refer to it as a Frankish–Roman liturgy (; ). Similarly, its chant, the so-called “Gregorian chant”, is the result of incorporating the “romana cantilena” (old Roman chant) into Gallican traditions (; ; ). Pope Adrian I, in fact, had been asked for the liturgical books of Urbe (; ) so that they could be copied and imposed, as an instrumentuum regni (instrument of political unification) in all the territories subjected to the authority of Charlemagne and his immediate successors (; ). Similarly, papal cantors also traveled to the Gauls to teach authentic Roman melodies (a phenomenological aspect of the liturgy), as in the case of Simeon: the papal schola’s secundicerius (). In addition to liturgical formularies, the Carolingians also viewed “music as a political program” ().
Those formularies (Sacramentaries, Antiphonaries, and Graduals), however, were missing many celebrations and, therefore, had to be completed. The additions are easily distinguishable because they were drafted in a different style peculiar to the lands of those intellectuals in the imperial circle (). This was a group of intellectuals that the emperor wanted around him in what was called the Schola Palatina. This was not a “school” as we would understand it today but more precisely an “academia”. It was the occasion for meeting and the possibility of disputing issues of culture intimately connected to the imperial government programs that Charlemagne himself desired and supported (). The term Schola Palatina is an “expression we find under the pen of Alcuin, designating a small group of learned men close to the sovereign, engaged in continuous discussions concerning all kinds of learned subjects” (). The Schola Palatina includes, for example, the monk Benedict of Aniane who was one of the great protagonists of the Carolingian Renaissance () and author of liturgical formularies ().
The genuinely Roman elements, moreover, were not always understood and, consequently, it was incumbent to answer the question of “why” it should be celebrated that way. It was a real search for the liturgical “ratio” in a period of liturgical reform and renovation often called renovatio (). Amalarius himself uses the term ratio in describing his way of proceeding in the expositions of his treatises and says, “in quo discamus de officio missae, quid rationis in se contineat diversitas illa quae ibi agitur” or, “that we may learn about the office of the mass and the purpose behind the variety that we practice during its celebrations” (). Moreover, as Jun Nishiwaki also notes in the specific case of some liturgical chants, Amalarius presents something original that differs from both the Roman and Metz traditions ().
Amalarius can be considered a key figure in early medieval and later liturgical–musical history. As Anne Walters Robertson writes: “His influence was still evident in the eleventh century, however, in works like the widely circulated Liber Quare, a tract in dialogue form” (; ). In fact, many “Passages from the Liber officialis were incorporated in many later liturgical commentaries” (), such as, for example, William Durand’s Rationale divinorum officiorum (13th century) (; ).
4. The Natural Power of Music: Plato and Boethius
Chapter XI of Liber III of Liber Officialis, the important liturgical commentary written by Amalarius, is entitled “De Officio lectoris et cantoris” (): “On the office of the lector and the cantor” (). In it, we read a sentence that seems to go beyond the mere description and explanation of the liturgical action and thus enter into the merits of the philosophy of music. The chapter is devoted to exposition on the liturgical ministries of the lector and the cantor in relation to that celebratory moment that corresponds to the epistle and the gradual responsory. The author begins defining and describing the protagonists of this part of the Mass: “The reader is so called because he has the task of reading the reading. The reading is so called because it is not sung like the psalms and hymns but only read. [...] The cantor has many offices and each of them is named according to what he performs.”7 The definitions given by Amalarius are often based on the Etymologies of Isidore of Seville (6th–7th century), but here he seems to go beyond what might be considered the “classic” definitions, for his time, of the Cantor. Isidorus of Seville, in fact, summarizes the definition of the cantor as “Cantor autem vocatus quia voce modulatur in cantu”: “he who conveniently moves his voice in song” (). For Amalarius, the cantor has many offices that are described and explained with images based on the Bible: the Cantor is the preacher, the farmer, the cattleman, etc., and his chant depicts the New Testament, Christ, the Arts, etc. ().
In particular, this author presents a relationship between what is read and what is sung that seems to be based precisely on music and its natural properties. The phrase in question is the following: “Musica habet quandam naturalem vim ad flectendum animum” () that Eric Knibbs translates as “Music has a kind of natural power for moving the spirit” (). The expression is followed by an explicit and unique, within the expositio (), quotation from the late Roman philosopher Severinus Boethius (5th–6th century) that serves to ground the statement in “de naturali vi musicae” (the natural power of music)8.
Curiously, Amalarius does not cite the precise passage where the expression vis musicae9 is encountered but reports the effects of music on humankind and the narrative of what happened with Timotheus of Miletus in Sparta. Before delving into the quotation and its context, both in Boethius’s and Amalarius’s treatments, we might ask why our author uses this philosopher to make his expositio. Medieval reflection on music rests its foundation on classical philosophy, which in this period enters through the writings of a number of authors of late antiquity (). In fact, as John J. Contreni writes: “ancient Roman classics were part and parcel of the intellectual and educational revival sparked by the Carolingian literary elite” ().
In particular, the philosophy of music owes much to the work of Severinus Boethius () who, in the early Christian Middle Ages, was considered an auctoritas to refer to. Boethius, Roman by birth but intellectually trained in Athens, is credited with translating the Greek classics into Latin, which allowed them to be read in later centuries in the West (). Until the ninth century, however, Boethius’s thought had not yet been recovered. Alcuin of York (8th–9th century), one of the great protagonists of the Carolingian Renaissance, is credited with this accomplishment. From the writings of this Anglo-Saxon monk and intellectual10, the Roman philosopher Boethius began to be referred to by leading medieval thinkers as among the authorities in philosophy and theology (). Amalarius, who explicitly refers to Alcuin as one of his teachers11, thus resorts to Boethius to ground his argument.
In his philosophical treatise on music (), the De Institutione musica, Liber I (), which contains the passages quoted by Amalarius, one sees in its conclusion this statement: “Musicam naturaliter nobis esse coniunctam ut ea ni si velimus quidem carere possimus” (), which we could translate as: “music is tied to us so naturally that even if we wanted to, we could not do without it”. There is an intimate bond between humankind and music to the extent that it is capable of generating transformations in humans since it enters from the ear straight to the heart (). We must consider how, in ancient culture, the heart was often the seat of intelligence and, in this way, connected to human behavior (; ). This is a question of “musical ethics”, i.e., how music can influence human behavior. The history of music also testifies to an ethical reading of musical genres and modology that parallels the symbolic interpretation of music theory (). In fact, the title of the first chapter of this Liber reports, after the above-mentioned statement “Musicam naturaliter nobis esse coniunctam”, the sphere in which it can act, i.e., behaviors: “et mores vel honestare vel evertere”: “and elevates or destroys behaviors” (). Boethius’s work, then, opens with ethical–psychological reflections (). This choice of his manifests his intention to show how theoretical reflection on music should never be separated from that of its moral and spiritual impact ().
Boethius also grounds these claims by resorting to certain auctoritates. We encounter examples drawn from famous classical authors (among them Pythagoras, Cicero, Terpander, Empedocles, etc.) who seem to be more connected to a “music therapy” associated with the psychological and cathartic effects of music (). Singing is seen as capable of working “wonders in the face of crises of soul and body” (). The first to be cited is Plato and concerns the episode of Timotheus of Miletus from the fifth–fourth century B.C. () in whom the focus is precisely on the ethical question connected to music and education. It concerns the narrative of what happened in Sparta when this celebrated poet and cithara player made an innovation that, at least for his contemporaries, had a negative repercussion on both ἁρμμονία (harmony)12 and on παιδεία (education) (), an enterprise so dear to the Spartans.
To understand who this character was and what he had done that was so reprehensible to the Spartans, it is interesting to consult the Σοῦδα, the 10th-century Byzantine encyclopedia, which provides an idea of what Eastern history has preserved in its memory about some famous characters. The encyclopedia states the following under the entry Τιμόθεος ὁ Μιλήσιος: “Timotheus, (son) of Thersander, or of Neomususus, or of Philopolis, Milesio, lyric poet. He added the tenth and eleventh chords (to the lyre) and changed the archaic music to a sweeter one”13. This change aroused great outrage and resulted in the issuance of a decree in which the Spartans expressed public disapproval of Timothy and forced him to cut the strings he had added to the lyre. The accusation was precisely that he had taught the young people things that were not right, i.e., singing built on the chromatic genre instead of the enharmonic genre. This teaching, it was feared, would have the consequence of making molles, that is, weakening, the strength and virility of the Spartan boys. Plato, in his work Πολιτεία (The Republic), inserts this testimony concerning Timothy to emphasize how the state must also supervise music () so that it retains a specific identity manifested by certain characteristics: modest, simple, virile; it was not to be effeminate, unrestrained, or unstable14. The supervision of the Spartan state authority was exercised by means of a law, the application of which led to the issuance of that decree which prohibited the indiscriminate teaching of all “musical modes”15 to children16.
This quotation from Plato, within Boethius’s treatise, served as an introduction for the Roman philosopher confirming the need for an accurate exposition of musical theory in order to guide intellectual effort “so that what is inherent in nature can also be appreciated on the basis of science” ().
5. The Gradual Responsory
Boethius’s treatment and, consequently, its original context with its explicit reference to Plato, enters Amalarius’s liturgical work and constitutes almost an interruption within his exposition. For our author, however, the context is decidedly different since this is neither a philosophical writing nor a music theory but a liturgical commentary within which the philosophy of music becomes an important element to ground his reasoning. We will try, now, to enter more into the context in which this quotation is situated, namely, Chapter XI of Liber III of his Liber Officialis. As mentioned above, this point of the discussion sets forth the “De Officio lectoris et cantoris”: the role and ratio of the reader and cantor within the celebratory moment that corresponds to the epistle and the gradual responsory.
This is a ritual moment that we can encounter not only in the Mass but also in the Liturgy of the Hours17 and which can be summarized by the Latin expression lectio cum cantico: after listening to “something that is read” (usually sacred scripture or patristic texts) there follows the meditative listening to “something that is sung”. Amalarius speaks of a ritual action with which he certainly would have had personal experience in the 9th century. Thus, it is not merely a theoretical reflection but his testimony of the “canere cum” (singing together) () that would indicate precisely community singing with its dynamics, as well as musicological, anthropological, and spiritual elements. This lectio cum cantico constitutes a significant liturgical model that belongs to the Christian liturgical tradition from at least the 4th–5th centuries to the present. There are many testimonies of the Fathers of the Church in this regard and we infer them, often, from their homilies in which they refer to these chants that we call “interlectionary” (). Our attention, then, must shift to the musicological characteristics related to the liturgical moment mentioned by Amalarius and, in particular, to its specific musical moment: the gradual responsory.
As we have said, in this part of the celebration we can identify a succession of two ministerial actions (that of the lector and the cantor) characterized, phenomenologically, by the offering of listening to a reading and, following that, a chant. Specifically, the chant presents a characteristic that distinguishes it from other liturgical–musical moments: it is not a simple, almost cantillated melody, but a true melismatic chant that requires a particularly trained cantor. This means that the individual syllables of its text are intoned on various polysonic neumes18 ranging from low- to high-pitched, making this liturgical–musical genre distinctly “virtuosic”. The name gradual responsory derives, first of all, from the place where it was performed. “Gradual” sees its etymology in the Latin gradus and stands for the steps of the ancient medieval ambo as we can still find today in the Basilica of St. Clement in Rome (12th century). This was the liturgical place reserved for the proclamation of the Word of God (read or sung) that saw the minister ascend to a higher position to proclaim the sacred text in the liturgical context.
The name ambo, in fact, comes from the Greek ἄμβων and indicates this movement of ascending (ἀναβαίνω) (). On a symbolic level, the ambo allows one to perceive the “height” of the sacred text proclaimed there and, from a functional point of view, was a clever acoustical device thought up before modern electronic sound amplification systems (). From an elevated position, sound can spread better into the liturgical space of late antiquity and medieval basilicas. The classical Isidorian definition of the responsory, quoted abundantly in later centuries, describes it as “uno canente, chorus consonando respondeat” () (to one who sings, the choir responds by singing together)19. Thus, it is understood that a soloist (praecentor) who offers the first part of the chant, called a responsum, is followed by a repetition of the same by the schola of singers (succentores) (; ). This responsum is also followed by a versus, which constitutes one of the most virtuosic moments in the entire Gregorian chant repertoire and is always entrusted to the cantor ().
The resulting musical phenomenon is clear: the possibility of experiencing a moment of listening to a melody in which the text seems almost secondary given the large number of neumatic melismas that amplify the vowels of individual syllables. An example that can help us understand this effect perceived by the listener can be found, for example, in the gradual responsory of Easter Day: Haec dies (). In it, as is indeed the case in this liturgical–musical genre, the text is sung on rich melismas that, in correspondence with the verb exultemus (central at the hermeneutical and theological level in the understanding of the versus), are realized with more than thirty sounds belonging to various neumatic figures.
Amalarius’s phrase: “Musica habet quandam naturalem vim ad flectendum animum” refers, given its location, to precisely this characteristic moment of musical and meditative listening within the liturgical celebration in which music is perceivable, as a sensory and spiritual experience, in all its power. Specifically, we could say that the vis of the music is here the result of all the components of Gregorian chant and its “aesthetic project” (): the melodic line with its rich neumatic figurations, the mode, and all the elements of musical and textual rhetoric designed for its composition that come to be implemented in the performance of a ritual action.
This liturgical–musical genre, despite having seen its composition in the medieval centuries within a specific celebratory project, is found, even today, in the Graduale romanum () as a possibility for today’s Catholic liturgy. It falls, thus, within the proper chant of the Catholic liturgy as evidenced by the current documents on Sacred Music of the Catholic Church that indicate Gregorian chant as the proper chant of the Roman rite (). In number 116 of Sacrosanctum Concilium, we read: “The Church acknowledges Gregorian chant as specially suited to the Roman liturgy: therefore, other things being equal, it should be given pride of place in liturgical services” (). Furthermore, in number 52 of Musicam Sacram, it is specified that, “Above all, the study and practice of Gregorian chant is to be promoted, because, with its special characteristics, it is a basis of great importance for the development of sacred music” (). These documents suggest how Gregorian chant, at least on a theoretical and exemplary level, constitutes a particular soundscape of the Roman rite in the tradition of Western Catholic religion. This soundscape, realized through a precise aesthetic peculiar to this musical genre, is acknowledged as having “special characteristics”, though without listing them. The work of Amalarius of Metz, who as early as the 9th century speaks of a force of music (vis musicae) that can be experienced in the liturgy, seems to describe and explain both its potentiality and its uniqueness, qualities that would seem to be included among those very “special characteristics”.
6. Compunction
But what would be the force of music (vis musicae) within this liturgical context of lectio cum cantico? To understand this, we must consider the particular expositio within which Amalarius inserts the parenthesis in which he quotes Boethius and, consequently, Plato. Our author is attempting to explain the meaning of the versus of the gradual responsory and, in order to do so, he makes use of the biblical image of the farmhand taken from the Gospel of Luke: “Who among you would say to your servant who has just come in from plowing or tending sheep in the field, ‘Come here immediately and take your place at table’? Would he not rather say to him, ‘Prepare something for me to eat’?” (Luke 17: 7–8). Amalarius states that the singer is the servant who is plowing the field. The action of “plowing”, an image that describes the singing of the gradual responsory, is a force that is capable of “breaking” the hearts of the hearers as if they were a field to be plowed. This is an allegorical image to describe compunction, a key word for understanding liturgical singing in the Carolingian era (). The etymology of this word, in Latin compunctio, sees precisely a puncture (punctio), which, for our author, can be described by the image of the plow’s wooden pole sticking into the ground. Immediately after quoting the Gospel, in fact, Amalarius states, “He plows who furrows hearts with the plow of compunction. There is no doubt that even our fleshly hearts are furrowed through the sweetness of melody, and that they open themselves like furrows through the confession of the voice and tears” (). What follows, at this point in the discussion, is his assertion that music has a natural force, as Boethius himself states in his work on music.
In his brief study on the cantor in Amalar, Dyer seems not to deepen the theme of compunctio but focuses only on the “sweetness of the voice”. The cantor, on the other hand, is “like the plowman who calls out to the oxen to drag the plow more cheerfully”. The sweet voice of the cantors “drive their own hearts and [those] of others to tears or to the confession of sins, as if opening up the mysteries (secreta) of the earth”, as does the farmer’s plow. Amalar believed that “the sweet voice of cantors” aids devotion “so that by its sweetness it might be fitting to encourage the people to confess the Lord” (). A similar reflection is presented by Nils Holger Petersen’s recent musicological study where he seems to insist on the adjective suavis in reference to the Carolingian liturgical chant: “It is well-known, that Carolingian commentators, as well as earlier ones, not least including St Augustine around 400, were occupied with the sound of the singing voice. Negatively, they would warn against the seductive quality of the voice; positively, they could ascribe to the sweet (suavis) sound of the song of the cantors the ability to lead the faithful to God” (). But, in my opinion, this vis musicae is not only concerning the suavitas.
The “force” of which Amalarius is speaking is a force capable of arousing deep emotion that, phenomenologically, manifests itself in tears. Felice Rainoldi describes this vis as a natural (psychological) influence that music has on the human soul (). The exact term to describe it is, as we have said, compunction but what we find in Amalarius’s exposition seems to be an original evolution of this spiritual doctrine proper to his time that does not seem to be echoed or deepened by other later authors20. An extensive diachronic comparative reading of the medieval and later sources is not the subject of this study of a particular liturgical soundscape. Notwithstanding, I can say that, in the following centuries, Amalarius’s work entered into the abbreviationes losing its original authenticity. For example, in William of Malmesbury’s Abbreviatio Amalarii (11th–12th century) () the author “took the time not only to abbreviate but also to revise the Liber officialis by Amalarius of Metz” ().
It is not, here, a matter of simply being moved but of a particular spiritual state that makes a person particularly receptive to listening. Amalarius seems to reiterate the concreteness of this weeping precisely by using the word carnalia (fleshly heart). In speaking of compunction in the Middle Ages, we are not referring to a mere sentiment. We need to remind ourselves of a characteristic of the medieval period, namely, its being an age that saw a certain centrality of concrete emotional experience. When, especially in the early medieval centuries, we find references to “emotions”, it is a reference to a personal and communal experience. Emotionality plays a very important role and, consequently, the liturgy is also a locus in which it is manifested and experienced: weeping becomes a concrete way of manifesting conversion21, or, as Nils Holger Petersen says about the notion of sweetness, “to bring people closer to God through contrition and God’s salvation. The song functioned as a sacred sign of the divine” (). This is, as Mary Carruthers writes, really a “deep theological and mystical experience” () that, in my opinion, is evoked not only by sweetness but more by an experience that includes all the aesthetic–musicological characteristics of the liturgical repertoire of the early Middle Ages.
Medieval mystical literature scholar Niklaus Largier, while not specifying which authors he is referring to, points out that, in the Middle Ages, there was an awareness of the link between musical experience and its effects on the bodies and souls of those who experience it: “The best examples of this might be found in texts where medieval authors discuss the impact of church music and song on their souls. Listening and singing the experience of music are portrayed as having a corporeal effect that produces sensations of an intense sensory and emotional character” (). As early as the 9th century, then, we find that awareness, now also confirmed by recent studies, which states that “music does not only express the emotions [...], but also evokes emotions” (). Music and its power are enthusiastically embraced in the anthropological and spiritual dynamics that insist on liturgical action and, precisely because of this, we are faced with a particular reception of this ancient doctrine regarding compunction. Amalarius’s reflection probably anticipates and prepares what we will later find in the iconographic program of the choir of the abbey church of Cluny (11th century). In this testimony of Romanesque art, the ten wooden columns of the choir represent a path to salvation, testifying, as Jacques Viret observes, that from the 10th century, owing in part to the Cluniac monks, the idea that “music leads man to salvation” seems to spread in Europe ().
During the patristic age, especially in the East, compunction was referred to by the term πένθος, meaning “sorrow”, but with a specific meaning that identified it as an inner sorrow that succeeds in opening humankind to a relationship with the divine and with neighbors (). For those authors, music, particularly music in the liturgical context, was seen as one of the main obstacles to achieving this inner state. As Irénée Hausherr’s famous study points out, the liturgy was often seen as an obstacle to compunction. In particular, then, it even seems that for the Eastern patristic tradition, hymns and tonality are a ground from which compunction cannot arise (). In the West, between the end of the patristic era and the beginning of the medieval one, Isidore of Seville (6th–7th century), states that singing the psalms can console the sadness of hearts. The image of the heart broken by the power of music seems to be contained in Isidore’s sentence where we encounter both carnalia corda and a verb—insono—describing precisely a singing that enters inside the heart22. In his reasoning, however, the force that allows the heart to be penetrated is that of the sacred text and not of the modulation of the voice. The power of singing the psalms (psallere), moreover, had already been recognized by John Cassian (4th–5th century) in his treating of the “igniting of prayer”. In his reasoning, this Church father pointed out how singing could elicit a privileged condition for fostering prayer23.
Amalarius, on the other hand, does not speak of the singing of psalms but precisely of the natural power of music and, because of this, seems to go beyond what we encounter in Isidore, even presenting an evolution of the doctrine of compunction. The ambiguity of music, and specifically of canora musica, is nevertheless present in his reflection where we also encounter an explicit quotation to Cyprian of Carthage (3rd century): “He tempts our ears through harmonious music, to soften and weaken our Christian strength upon hearing a sweet sound” ()24. Here, too, we can see commonalities with Boethius’s quotation and, in particular, the verb mollio (to weaken) that relates to the accusation made by the Spartans against Timothy of Miletus. What Amalarius accomplishes, then, seems to be the synthesis of two parallel reflections. On the one hand, the Christian doctrine concerning compunction and, on the other hand, the medieval philosophy of music with its roots in Plato’s reflection. Music naturally (naturaliter) has this force that can bend the human soul and does so by arousing this particular state of the spirit, compunction, which manifests itself in a purifying weeping. This cleft in the heart would allow the sacred text to be heard before the responsory to enter deeply into a person’s soul.
7. Conclusions
Amalarius of Metz’s exposition on the gradual responsory bears witness to a liturgical practice peculiar to a historical period, the Carolingian revival (8th–9th centuries), and to a geographical area: Gaul. As we have seen, within his discussion the author inserts a quotation that belongs to the philosophy of classical music, allowing us to grasp some of the characteristics proper to the musical phenomenon itself within a liturgical experience. Reading what this explicator and commentator of the early medieval liturgy writes, it does indeed seem that the liturgy makes its own awareness of the power that music naturally possesses, as well as an attempt to harness that power for the benefit of the spiritual experience of those living that moment.
Precisely because it is a “force” that is able to act within the interiority of humankind, this also raises the ethical question related to musical genres. Music, then, has an ambivalence that leads it to be both a positive and a negative presence within the human religious experience. What Plato asserts as the duty of civil authority in policing licit melodies, probably, translates into an equal responsibility entrusted to religious authority in ensuring, within the liturgy, a musical experience that allows for an authentic experience of internalization and meditation connected to what is proclaimed in the sacred text. This experience, from Amalarius’s exposition, is associated with a precise liturgical–musical genre proper to Gregorian chant: the gradual responsory with its musicological characteristics. The “force”, then, would seem to reside in a modal and melismatic soundscape. Owing to this force of music, humankind is able to achieve a spiritual state of acceptance of what is heard and, consequently, the possibility of meditation upon and internalization of the sacred text.
Even today, Gregorian chant continues to find an appreciation as a soundscape to accompany meditative and relaxing moments, beyond Catholic liturgical practice. This may be attributable to its natural force that, in its compositional aesthetics, can express itself with great effectiveness in the human soul. The “beauty” and fascination of this musical repertoire, then, appears to derive not only from a musical language based on melodic and modal components capable of describing the text but, at the same time, seems linked to its ability to make an exegesis of the text in musical terms. Moreover, chant recognizes the natural power of music that, for humankind, becomes a force capable of speaking to the inner self (heart) by evoking emotions that transform and direct behavior and, in particular, dispose human beings to attentive, deep, and fruitful listening.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Notes
| 1 | To the first generation of these intellectuals belonged Benedict of Aniane and Alcuin of York, while Amalarius of Metz would place himself as a pupil of them (). |
| 2 | For a biographical profile of this author, two recent publications are of interest: First, Christopher A. Jones, A lost work by Amalarius of Metz and specifically, section III.2, “Backgrounds and comparanda: Amalarius before and after the Liber officialis” (). The second recent work is Wolfgan Steck, Der Liturgiker Amalarius—eine quellenkritische Untersuchung zu Leben und Werk eines Theologen der Karolingerzeit and specifically, chapter 2, “Der Forschungsstand zu Amalars Biographie” (). Of particular import as an indispensable reference, however, is the great work completedby the Belgian Jesuit, Father Jean Michel Hanssens (1885–1976), not only for the texts edited by Hanssens but also for his detailed introductions, including the biographical profile, Amalarii vita et operae (). For completeness, although the bibliographical references do not seem up to date, I point out the recent introduction “Wstęp” to the Polish translation (). |
| 3 | Among the writings testifying to this embassy is a small poem in verse dedicated by Amalarius to his friend Peter, the Versus Marini (). |
| 4 | Two canonical rules (, ) have traditionally been attributed to him that also present prescriptions on “what to sing” in the liturgy often with references to Frankish Bishop Chrodegan of Metz (). |
| 5 | An English-language translation, based on Hanssens’ work, has been produced by Eric Knibs (). |
| 6 | For an understanding of this literary genre, characteristic of the medieval period and based on allegoresis (), the contribution of French liturgist Hélène Bricout is interesting (; ), who brings a new key to André Wilmart’s traditional definition (). In the German field, moreover, we can consider the studies on the liturgical allegoresis of Jan-Dirk Müller (), Reinhard Meßner (), and Anders Ekenberg (). In contrast, Joseph Dyer’s work on the cantor in Amalarius, despite focusing most of the discussion on an introduction and contextualization of the topic (only 13 pages of the approximately 35 are devoted to the paragraph titled: “The Cantor in Amalarian Allegory”), only seems to use the expressions: “allegorical interpretation” and “allegorical exegesis” without using the word “allegoresis” (). |
| 7 | “Lector dicitur, quia lectione fungitur […]. Lectio dicitur, quia non cantatur, ut psalmus vel ymnus, sed legitur tantum. Cantor multa officia habet. Unumquodque officium ex illo quod efficit, nomen habet.” (). |
| 8 | This is precisely the expression we find at the conclusion of his parenthesis on the power of music: “Suffiant haec pauca de naturali vi musicae inseruisse” () or “Let these few remarks that I have included on the natural power of music suffice” (). |
| 9 | Boethius uses this expression mainly in two places in his treatise De Institutione musica: in the first chapter of Liber I: “In tantum vero priscae philosophiae studiis vis musicae artis innotuit”: “The power of the art of music had such notoriety in the studies of ancient philosophy” (); and in the title of the second chapter, also in Liber I, where we read, “De vi musicae”: “On the power of music” (). |
| 10 | The work of I Deug-Su is still a publication of interest in this regard (). |
| 11 | Probably Amalarius, unlike other authors of his generation such as Rabanus Maurus, did not have the opportunity to attend Alcuin’s lectures but, in spite of this, recognized his intellectual greatness to the point of explicitly referring to him as his teacher. Indeed, we read, “videbar puer esse ante Albinum doctissimum magistrum totius regionis nostrae”: “It seemed to me that I was a child before Alcuin, the most learned teacher of our whole region” (). |
| 12 | In music, the meaning corresponds to the “tuning of an instrument”, and from it is also derived the arrangement of intervals, that is, the distance between one note and another within a musical scale (). |
| 13 | “Τιμόθεος, Θερσάνδρου ἢ Νεομούσον ἢ Φιλοπόλιδος, Μιλήσιος, λυρικός- ὃς, τὴν ί καὶ ιἀ χορδὴν προσέθηκε καὶ τὴν ἀρχαίαν μουσικὴν ἐπὶ μαλακώτερον μεθὴγαγεν”. “Τιμόθεος ὁ Μιλήσιος” (). |
| 14 | Boethius’s Latin text thus indicates these characteristics, “modesta ac simplex et mascula nec effeminata, nec fera nec varia” (). |
| 15 | By modality, we can mean a particular organized system of musical intervals adopted in musical practice. The three basic genres, according to the ancient theory handed down by Boethius and Cassiodorus, are diatonic, chromatic, and enharmonic (). It is not just music theory based on mathematical proportions but, through the modes, there is a message that comes along with the music and the sung text (; ). |
| 16 | These are Plato’s words on the subject: “εἶδος γὰρ καινὸν μουσικῆς μεταβάλλειν εὑλαβητέον ώς ἐν ὅλῳ κινδυνεύοντα- οὐδαμοῦ γὰρ κινοῦνται μουσικῆς τρόποι ἂνευ πολιτικῶν νόμων τῶν μεγίστων, ὣς φησί τε Δάμων καὶ ἐγώ πείθομαι”. “In particular, the replacement of one genre of music with a new one should be viewed with suspicion because it risks undermining the whole. Consequently, under no circumstances should the genres of music be changed, since, in that case, one could not avoid shaking the foundations on which rests the constitution of the State. This Damon says, this I approve” (). |
| 17 | In this liturgical celebration, it is the reading that is followed by a responsory called “prolixum” to differentiate it from the “short” one (). To this liturgical moment, Amalarius dedicates an exposition in the Prologus antiphonarii (). |
| 18 | Gregorian chant notation sees the use of graphic symbols called “neumes”. “The word neume comes from Greek and Latin neuma, meaning gesture. In a transferred sense, a melodic gesture would be the movement of the voice while delivering a syllable of text” (). These are not the indication of individual pitches but of melodic groups with different combinations of pitches with descending, ascending, or repercussion movements (). |
| 19 | In the Etymologies we read, “Responsoriis Itali tradiderunt. Quos inde responsorios cantus vocant, quod alio desinente id alter respondeat”. (). (Responsories belong to the Italic tradition. The name “responsorial chant” comes from the fact that when one voice stops, another responds). |
| 20 | For example, in his epistle to Pope Clement IV, Roger Bacon (13th century) quotes Boethius to denounce the abuses in the singing of his time. We find the theme of the force of music (vis and potentia musicae) but only to emphasize the effects of music on morality. A reference to compunction is missing (). |
| 21 | Interesting in this regard is Gerd Althoff’s study of emotions in the Middle Ages, which also highlights the concrete role of tears in penitential practice (). |
| 22 | “Nam quamvis dura sint carnalia corda, statim ut psalmi dulcedo insonuerit, ad affectum pietatis animum eorum inflectit” (). (“For no matter how hard their carnal hearts may be, as soon as the sweetness of a psalm resonates, it moves their minds to the feeling of pity”). |
| 23 | “Nunnumquam etenim psalmi cuiscumque versiculus occasionem orationis ignitae decantantibus nobis praebuit”. (). (“Once while I was singing the psalms a verse of it put me in the way of the prayer of tire”) (). On liturgical spirituality and the oratione ignita (prayer of fire) see also Vagaggini’s studies (). |
| 24 | “Aures per canora musica tentat, ut in soni dulcioris auditu solvat et molliat Christianum vigorem” (). See also Cyprian’s De zelo et livore (). |
References
- Albert, Werminghoff, ed. 1906a. Institutio canonicorum Aquisgranensi. In Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Concilia Aevi Karolini. Hannover: Impensis Bibliopolii Hahniani, vol. 2,1, pp. 308–420. [Google Scholar]
- Albert, Werminghoff, ed. 1906b. Institutio sanctimonialium Aquisgranensis. In Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Concilia Aevi Karolini. Hannover: Impensis Bibliopolii Hahniani, vol. 2,1, pp. 421–55. [Google Scholar]
- Althoff, Gerd. 2000. Gefühle in der öffentlichen Kommunikation des Mittelalters. In Emotionalität. Zur Geschichte der Gefühle. Edited by Claudia Benthien, Anne Fleig and Ingrid Kasten. Cologne: Böhlau-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
- Amalarius of Metz. 1867. Versus Marini. In Monumenta Carolina. Edited by Philipp Jaffé. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, pp. 426–29. [Google Scholar]
- Amalarius of Metz. 1949. Prologus antiphonarii a se compositi. In Amalarii Episcopi, Opera Liturgica Omnia. Edited by Jean Michel Hanssens. Vatican City: Vatican Apostolic Library, vol. 1, pp. 359–63. [Google Scholar]
- Amalarius of Metz. 1950a. Liber de ordine antiphonarii. In Amalarii Episcopi, Opera Liturgica Omnia. Edited by Jean Michel Hanssens. 3 vols. Vatican City: Vatican Apostolic Library, pp. 5–224. [Google Scholar]
- Amalarius of Metz. 1950b. Liber officialis. In Amalarii Episcopi, Opera Liturgica Omnia. Edited by Jean Michel Hanssens. 2 vols. Vatican City: Vatican Apostolic Library, pp. 9–543. [Google Scholar]
- Amalarius of Metz. 2014. On the Liturgy. Edited by Eric Knibbs. 2 vols. Boston: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Angenendt, Arnold. 2005. Liturgia e storia. In Lo Sviluppo Organico in Questione. Assisi: Cittadella Editrice. [Google Scholar]
- Apel, Willi. 1998. Il canto gregoriano. In Liturgia, Storia, Notazione, Modalità e Tecniche Compositive. Edited by Ma Della Sciuca. Lucca: Libreria Musicale Italiana. [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson, Charles Mercer. 2009. The Critical Nexus: Tone-System, Mode, and Notation in Early Medieval Music. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Bacon, Roger. 1859. Opus tertium. In Opera Quædam Hactenus Inedita. Vol. I. Containing I.—Opus Tertium. II.—Opus Minus. III.—Compendium Philosophiæ. Edited by Brewer John Sherren. London: Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts, pp. 3–310. [Google Scholar]
- Barbero, Alessandro. 2004. Carlo Magno. In Un Padre dell’Europa. Bari: Laterza. [Google Scholar]
- Baroffio, Giacomo. 2012. Variabilità dell’organico nell’esecuzione del canto piano tra IX e XIV secolo. Rivista Internazionale di Musica Sacra 33: 265–69. [Google Scholar]
- Beschi, Luigi. 2023. La paideia musicale nella Grecia classica. In Ερκος. Studi in Onore di Franco Sartori. Edited by Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità dell’Università di Padova. Padua: Sargon, pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Boethius, Severinus. 1990. De Institutione Musica. Edited by Giovanno Marzi. Rome: Italian Institute for the History of Music. [Google Scholar]
- Bricout, Hélène. 2014. L’evoluzione della mistagogia in occidente. Le Expositiones missae medievali. In La Mistagogia. Attualità di una Antica Risorsa. Atti della XLI Settimana di Studio dell’Associazione Professori di Liturgia, Alghero, 26–30 August 2013. Edited by Luigi Girardi. Rome: Edizioni Liturgiche, pp. 53–59. [Google Scholar]
- Bricout, Hélène. 2016. Expliquer les rites de la messe: L’apport d’Amalaire. In Liturgie, Pensée Théologique et Mentalités Religieuses au Haut Moyen Âge: Le Témoignage des Sources Liturgique. Edited by Hélène Bricout and Martin Klöckener. Muenster: Aschendorff, pp. 101–27. [Google Scholar]
- Callahan, Annice. 2003. Cuore. In Nuovo Dizionario di Spiritualità. Edited by Michael Downey. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, pp. 198–99. [Google Scholar]
- Campesato, Claudio. 2021. Allegoria Modale. In L’Interpretazione Allegorica dell’Octoechos Come Ermeneutica Liturgico-Musicale Nella “Summa de Officiis Ecclesiasticis” di Guglielmo di Auxerre. Zurich: Lit. [Google Scholar]
- Campesato, Claudio. 2023. In littera et tono: Un linguaggio teologico dalle otto antifone mnemonico-didattiche del tonario di San Marziale di Limoges. Rivista Liturgica 110: 213–40. [Google Scholar]
- Cardini, Franco, and Marina Montesano. 2006. Storia Medievale. Florence: Le Monnier University. [Google Scholar]
- Carruthers, Mary. 2013. The Experience of Beauty in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Cassian, John. 1886. Conlationes IX. Edited by Michael Petschenig. Vienna: Geroldi filium Bibliopolam Academiae. [Google Scholar]
- Cassian, John. 1985. Conferences. Edited by Colm Luibheid. Mahwah: Paulist Press. [Google Scholar]
- Catalano, Alfio Giuseppe. 2015. Liturgia. La Messa e L’Ufficio divino. In Alla Scuola del Canto Gregoriano. Studi in Forma di Manuale. Edited by Fulvio Rampi. Parma: Musidora, pp. 169–204. [Google Scholar]
- Cattin, Giulio. 1991. La Monodia Nel Medioevo, 2nd ed. Torino: EDT. [Google Scholar]
- Chrodegang. 2017. The Chrodegang Rules: The Rules for the Common Life of the Secular Clergy from the Eighth and Ninth Centuries. In Critical Texts with Translations and Commentary. Edited by Jerome Bertram. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Clément, Olivier. 1998. Teologia e Poesia del Corpo. Casale Monferrato: Piemme. [Google Scholar]
- Comotti, Giovanni. 1996. La Musica Nella Cultura Greca e Romana. Torino: EDT. [Google Scholar]
- Contreni, John Joseph. 2016. Getting to know Virgil in the Carolingian age: The Vita Publii Virgilii. In Rome and Religion in the Medieval World: Studies in Honor of Thomas F. X. Noble, Surrey: Ashgate. Edited by Valerie L. Garver and Owen Michael Phelan. London: Routledge, pp. 21–46. [Google Scholar]
- Cortoni, Claudio Ubaldo. 2016. «Habeas corpus». In Il Corpo di Cristo Dalla Devozione Alla Sua Umanità al Culto Eucaristico (Sec. VIII–XV). Roma: Pontificio Ateneo S. Anselmo. [Google Scholar]
- Cyprian of Carthage. 1976. De zelo Et Livore. Edited by Manlio Simonetti. Turnhout: Brepols. [Google Scholar]
- Deshusses, Jean. 1979. Le Sacramentaire Grégorien. In Ses Principales Formes d’Apres les Plus Anciens Manuscripts, 2nd ed. 3 vols. Fribourg: Éditions Universitaries. [Google Scholar]
- Deug-Su, I. 1984. Cultura e Ideologia Nella Prima età Carolingia. Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medio Evo. [Google Scholar]
- Diosi, David. 2006. Amalarius Fortunatus in der Trierer Tradition. In Eine Quellenkritische Untersuchung der Trierischen Zeugnisse über Einen Liturgiker der Karolingerzeit. Münster: Aschendorff. [Google Scholar]
- Donato, Antonio. 2021. Boezio. In Un Pensatore Tardodiantico e il suo Mondo. Rome: Carrocci. [Google Scholar]
- Durand, William. 1995–2000. Rationale Divinorum Officiorum. Edited by Anselmus Davril and Timothy M. Thibodeau. Turnhout: Brepols. [Google Scholar]
- Dyer, Joseph. 2018. The Image of the Cantor in the Writings of Amalar of Metz. Études Grégorienne 45: 107–41. [Google Scholar]
- Eco, Umberto. 2016. Arte e Bellezza nell’Estetica Medievale. Milano: La nave di Teseo. [Google Scholar]
- Ekenberg, Anders. 1987. Cur Cantatur? Die Funktionen des Liturgischen Gesanges Nach den Autoren der Karolingerzeit. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. [Google Scholar]
- Ewig, Eugen. 2004. Culmine e declino dell’epoca carolingia (814–840). In Storia della Chiesa, 4th ed. Edited by Hubert Jedin. Milano: Jaca Book, pp. 135–64. [Google Scholar]
- Flores, Juan Javier. 2016. La evolución del concepto de sacramento a través de los siglos. In Una Visión Litúrgica de la Sacramentalidad de la Iglesia. Barcelona: Centre de Pastoral Litúrgica. [Google Scholar]
- Gilson, Étienne. 2020. La filosofia nel Medioevo. In Dalle Origini Patristiche Alla Fine del XIV Secolo, 6th ed. Milano: Rizzoli. [Google Scholar]
- Girardi, Luigi. 2014. Sacrosanctum Concilium. Commento. In Sacrosanctum Concilium. Inter Mirifica. Edited by Serena Noceti and Roberto Repole. Bologna: EDB, pp. 81–299. [Google Scholar]
- González Villanueva, Josè Ignacio. 2008–2010. Pauta metodológica en el estudio de las piezas gregorianas. Aportaciones prácticas. Estudios Gregorianos 3: 33–103. [Google Scholar]
- Götz, Georg Polycarp, ed. 1983. Liber Quare. Turnhout: Brepols. [Google Scholar]
- Graduale Novum. 2011. Editio Magis Critica Iuxta SC 117 seu Graduale Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae Pauli PP. In VI Cura Regcognitum, ad Exemplar Ordinis Cantus Missae Dispositum, luce Codicum Antiquiorum Restitutum nutu Sancti Oecumenici Concilii Vaticani II, Neumis Laudunensibus et Sangallensibus Ornatum. Tomus I: De Dominicis Et Festis. Regensburg: ConBrio Verlagsgesellschaft. [Google Scholar]
- Graduale Romanum. 1974. Sacrosanctae Romanae Ecclesiae de Tempore et de Sanctis. Solesmes: Desclée & Co. [Google Scholar]
- Grillo, Andrea. 2022. Liturgia fondamentale. In Una Introduzione Alla Teologia dell’Azione Rituale. Assisi: Cittadella Editrice. [Google Scholar]
- Hanssens, Jean Michel. 1948. Amalarii Vita. In Amalarii Episcopi, Opera Liturgica Omnia. Edited by Jean Michel Hanssens. Vatican City: Vatican Apostolic Library, vol. 1, pp. 58–82. [Google Scholar]
- Hanssens, Jean Michel. 1950. Indices. In Amalarii Episcopi, Opera Liturgica Omnia. Edited by Jean Michel Hanssens. Vatican City: Vatican Apostolic Library, vol. 3. [Google Scholar]
- Hausherr, Irénée. 2013. Penthos. In La Dottrina della Compunzione nell’Oriente Cristiano. Teolo: Abbazia di Praglia. [Google Scholar]
- Hayward, Paul Antony. 2017. William of Malmesbury as a Cantor-Historian. In Medieval Cantors and Their Craft: Music, Liturgy and the Shaping of History, 800–1500. Edited by Katie Ann-Marie Bugyis, Andrew B. Kraebel and Margot E. Fassler. Woodbridge: York Medieval Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hiley, David. 2009. Gregorian Chant. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Ihnatowicz, Janusz Artur. 2016. Wstęp. In Amalariusz z Metzu, Święte Obrzędy Kościoła. Edited by Tadeusz Gacia. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, vol. 1, pp. 13–17. [Google Scholar]
- Isidorus of Seville. 1989. De Ecclesiasticis Officiis. Edited by Christopher M. Lawson. Turnhout: Brepols. [Google Scholar]
- Isidorus of Seville. 1998. Sententiae. Edited by Pierre Cazier. Turnhout: Brepols. [Google Scholar]
- Isidorus of Seville. 2014. Etymologiarum Sive Originum Libri XX. Edited by Angelo Valastro Canale. 2 vols. Novara: UTET. [Google Scholar]
- Ivorra Robla, Adolfo V. 2007. Los Sentidos de la Liturgia en Amalario de Metz: Bautismo y Eucaristía. Toledo: Instituto Teológico San Ildefonso. [Google Scholar]
- Jaschinski, Eckhard. 2018. Breve Storia della Musica Sacra, 2nd ed. Brescia: Queriniana. [Google Scholar]
- Jeffrey, Henderson, ed. 1993. Suda T 620 Τιμόθεος ὁ Μιλήσιος. In Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Available online: https://www.loebclassics.com/view/timotheus-testimonia/1993/pb_LCL144.73.xml (accessed on 2 August 2023).
- Jones, Christopher Andrew. 2001. A lost work by Amalarius of Metz. In Interpolations in Salisbury, Cathedral Library, MS. 154. London: Boydell Press (For the Henry Bradshaw Society). [Google Scholar]
- Jungmann, Josef Andreas. 1963. Origini, Liturgia, Storia e Teologia della Messa Romana, 2nd ed. 2 vols. Turin: Marietti. [Google Scholar]
- Kunzler, Michael. 2018. La Liturgia della Chiesa, 3rd ed. Milano: Jaca Book. [Google Scholar]
- Largier, Niklaus. 2003. Inner Senses—Outer Senses: The Practice of Emotions in Medieval Mysticism. In Codierung Von Emotionen Im Mittelalter/Emotions and Sensibilities in the Middle Ages. Edited by Stephen Jaeger and Ingrid Kasten. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- La Rosa, Luigi. 2022. Storia della Catechesi. 2. Dire Dio Nel Medioevo. Roma: LAS. [Google Scholar]
- Levy, Kenneth. 1998. Gregorian Chant and the Carolingians. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Levy, Kenneth. 2000. A New Look at Old Roman Chant. Early Music History 19: 81–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lluch-Baixauli, Miguel. 1997. Boezio. In La Ragione Teologica. Milan: Jaca Book. [Google Scholar]
- Marchetti-Salvatori, Biagio. 1990. Compunzione. In Dizionario Enciclopedico di Spiritualità. Edited by Ermanno Ancilli. Rome: Città Nuova, vol. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Marenbon, John. 2009. Dalla cerchia di Alcuino alla scuola di Auxerre. In Figure del Pensiero Medievale, Fondamenti e Inizi. Secoli IV–IX. Edited by Inos Biffi and Costante Marbelli. Milan: Jaca Book-Città Nuova, vol. 1, pp. 369–433. [Google Scholar]
- Meßner, Reinhard. 1993. Zur Hermeneutik allegorischer Liturgieerklärung in Ost und West. Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 115: 415–34. [Google Scholar]
- Müller, Jan-Dirk. 2017. Amalars Messallegorese: Allegorie und Theatralität. In Zur historischen Prägnanz allegorischer und Symbolischer Sinnstiftung. Edited by Bernhard Huss and David Nelting. Heidelber: Universitätsverlag Winter, pp. 87–112. [Google Scholar]
- Neunheuser, Burkhard. 1999. Storia della Liturgia Attraverso le Epoche Culturali, 3rd ed. Roma: CLV-Edizioni liturgiche. [Google Scholar]
- Nishiwaki, Jun. 2016. Compunctio: Über ein Schlüsselwort zum Verständnis des liturgischen Singens in der Karolingerzeit. Beiträge zur Gregorianik 62: 71–78. [Google Scholar]
- Nishiwaki, Jun. 2017. Amalar und seine Auslegung von den O-Antiphonen: Zum Verständnis des Gregorianischen Repertoires in der Karolingerzeit. Beiträge zur Gregorianik 64: 99–104. [Google Scholar]
- Orbetello, Luca. 1989. Boezio e Dintorni. Ricerche Sulla Cultura Medievale. Firenze: Nardini editore. [Google Scholar]
- Pecklers, Keith. 2013. Liturgia. In La Dimensione Storica e Teologica del Culto Cristiano e le Sfide del Domani, 2nd ed. Brescia: Queriniana. [Google Scholar]
- Petersen, Nils Holger. 2020. The Beginnings of Musical Notation and Carolingian Uses of the Term ‘Sacrament’ A Theological Perspective. In Von der Oralität zum SchiftBild: Visuelle Kultur und Musikalische Notation (9–13 Jahrhundert). Edited by Matteo Nanni and Kira Henkel. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Petersen, Nils Holger. 2021. Medieval Rituals, the Arts, and the Notion of Medievalism. Available online: https://www.ucy.ac.cy/netmar/medieval-rituals-the-arts-and-the-notion-of-medievalism/ (accessed on 2 August 2023).
- Plato. 2009. Πολιτεία. Edited by Giovanni Reale and Roberto Radice. Milamo: Bompiani. [Google Scholar]
- Raffa, Vincenzo. 2011. Liturgia eucaristica. In Mistagogia della Messa: Dalla Storia e Dalla Teologia Alla Pastorale Pratica. Roma: CLV-Edizioni liturgiche. [Google Scholar]
- Rainoldi, Felice. 2000. Traditio Canendi. In Appunti Per Una Storia Dei Riti Cantati. Roma: CLV-Edizioni Liturgiche. [Google Scholar]
- Rampi, Fulvio, and Alessandro De Lillo. 2019. Nella mente del notatore. In Semiologia Gregoriana a Ritroso. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. [Google Scholar]
- Rankin, Susan. 1994. Carolingian music. In Carolingian Culture: Emulation and Innovation. Edited by Rosamond McKitterick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Riché, Pierre, and Jacques Verger. 2019. Nani Sulle Spalle di Giganti: Maestri e Allievi Nel Medioevo, 2nd ed. Milano: Jaca book. [Google Scholar]
- Righetti, Mario. 2014. Storia Liturgica, 3rd ed. 3 vols. Milan: Ancora. [Google Scholar]
- Romano, John F. 2020. Liturgy and Society in Early Medieval Rome. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Ruini, Cesarino. 2011. Canto liturgico e politica imperiale carolingia. In Atlante Storico della Musica Nel Medioevo. Edited by Vera Minazzi. Milano: Jaca Book. [Google Scholar]
- Sacrosanctum Concilium Oecumenicum Vaticanum II. 1963a. Musicam Sacram, Instruction on Music in the Liturgy. 5 March 1967. Available online: https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_instr_19670305_musicam-sacram_en.html (accessed on 2 August 2023).
- Sacrosanctum Concilium Oecumenicum Vaticanum II. 1963b. Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium, Solemnly Promulgated by His Holiness Pope Paul VI on December 4. Available online: https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19631204_sacrosanctum-concilium_en.html (accessed on 2 August 2023).
- Sloboda, John, and Patrik N. Juslin. 2012. At the interface between the inner and outer world. Psychological perspectives. In Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications, 3rd ed. Edited by John Sloboda and Patrik N. Juslin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 73–98. [Google Scholar]
- Steck, Wolfgang. 2000. Der Liturgiker Amalarius—Eine Quellenkritische Untersuchung zu Leben und Werk eines Theologen der Karolingerzeit. St. Ottilien: EOS. [Google Scholar]
- Tabacco, Giovanni. 2010. Alto Medioevo. Novara: UTET Università. [Google Scholar]
- Vagaggini, Cipriano. 1999. Il Senso Teologico della Liturgia, 6th ed. Cinisello Balsamo: San Paolo. [Google Scholar]
- Vauchez, André. 2020. La Spiritualità dell’Occidente Medioevale. Milano: Vita e Pensiero. [Google Scholar]
- Vedriš, Trpimir. 2018. Amalarius’s stay in Zadar reconsidered. In Imperial Spheres and the Adriatic: Byzantium, the Carolingians and the Treaty of Aachen (812). Edited by Mladen Ančić, Jonathan Shepard and Trpimir. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 288–311. [Google Scholar]
- Viret, Jacques. 2016. Musica Medievale. Roma: Simmetria. [Google Scholar]
- Walters Robertson, Anne. 2000. From Office to Mass. The Antiphons of Vespers and Lauds and the Antiphons before the Gospel in Northern France. In The Divine Office in the Latin Middle Ages: Methodology and Source Studies, Regional Developments, Hagiography. Edited by Margot Elsbeth Fassler and Rebecca Anne Baltzer. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- William of Malmesbury. 1980. The “Abbreviatio Amalarii” of William of Malmesbury. Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale 47: 113. [Google Scholar]
- Wilmart, André. 1922. Expositio missae. In Dictionnaire d’Archéologie Chrétienne et de Liturgie. Paris: Letouzey, vol. 5/1, pp. 1014–27. [Google Scholar]
- Zambon, Francesco. 2021. Allegoria. In Una Breve Storia dall’Antichità a Dante. Roma: Carrocci. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).