Next Article in Journal
Singing Nuns and Soft Power: British Diplomats as Music Tourists in Seicento Venice
Previous Article in Journal
Confucianism for Kids: Early Childhood Employments of Confucianism in Taipei and Tokyo
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Road to Reconciliation—Insights from Christian Public Theology
Article

Read the Signs: Detecting Early Warning Signals of Interreligious Conflict

Department of Religious Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Gladys Ganiel and Jeffery D. Long
Religions 2022, 13(4), 329; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040329
Received: 10 February 2022 / Revised: 14 March 2022 / Accepted: 28 March 2022 / Published: 6 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religious Conflict and Peacebuilding: Advances in the Field)
Building on recent directions in religion-related social and political science, our essay addresses the need for location-specific and religion-specific scientific research that might contribute directly to local and regional interreligious peacemaking. Over the past 11 years, our US–Pakistani research team has conducted research of this kind. We have developed a social scientific method for diagnosing the probable near-future behavior of religious stakeholder groups toward other groups. By integrating features of ethnography, linguistics, and semiotics, the method enables researchers to read a range of ethno-linguistic signals that appear uniquely in the discourses of religious groups. Examining the results, we observe, firstly, that our religion and location-specific science identifies features of religious group behavior that are not evident in broader social scientific studies of religion and conflict. We observe, secondly, that our science integrates constative and performative elements: it seeks facts, and it serves a purpose. We conclude that strictly constative fact-driven sciences may fail to detect certain crucial features of religious stakeholder group behavior. View Full-Text
Keywords: religion; interreligious conflict; science; constative; performative; peacemaking; ethnolinguistics; semiotics; behavioral signals; group behavior religion; interreligious conflict; science; constative; performative; peacemaking; ethnolinguistics; semiotics; behavioral signals; group behavior
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ochs, P.; Fahim, E.; Pinzon, P. Read the Signs: Detecting Early Warning Signals of Interreligious Conflict. Religions 2022, 13, 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040329

AMA Style

Ochs P, Fahim E, Pinzon P. Read the Signs: Detecting Early Warning Signals of Interreligious Conflict. Religions. 2022; 13(4):329. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040329

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ochs, Peter, Essam Fahim, and Paola Pinzon. 2022. "Read the Signs: Detecting Early Warning Signals of Interreligious Conflict" Religions 13, no. 4: 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040329

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop