Next Article in Journal
Ham Sok Hon, a Pioneer of Korean Cosmopolitanism
Next Article in Special Issue
Alfred Russel Wallace’s Intelligent Evolution and Natural Theology
Previous Article in Journal
Buddhist Modernism Underway in Bhutan: Gross National Happiness and Buddhist Political Theory
Article

Strong and Weak Teleology in the Life Sciences Post-Darwin

UAB Libraries, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
Religions 2020, 11(6), 298; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11060298
Received: 27 May 2020 / Revised: 11 June 2020 / Accepted: 15 June 2020 / Published: 18 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Christianity and Science: Fresh Perspectives)
It is often assumed that direction and purpose in nature—teleology—is a dead relic of the past, a result of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859) and Descent of Man (1871). But teleology has had a long and complex relationship with science. This paper will trace its general history with an emphasis upon the life sciences, especially biology. Particularly important is the fact that all teleology is not equal; strong (transcendent) teleology (designated Ts) should be distinguished from weak (purely descriptive and utilitarian) teleology (designated Tw). A working definition of teleology in its most meaningful aspects is then given. The challenges that Darwinism faced in dealing with purpose in nature are discussed, as is their proposed solution in the evolutionary synthesis, and the persistence of Ts following that synthesis is outlined and critiqued. Evidence of Ts persistence in the life sciences is presented with several relevant examples, and strong teleology is further differentiated by specific (Ts+) and nonspecific (Ts−) varieties. This essay concludes that Ts remains an ongoing and integral part of the life sciences and will likely remain so, even though it may be true but not verifiable empirically. View Full-Text
Keywords: teleology; teleonomy; teleometry; Darwinism; neo-Darwinian synthesis; evolution; Lecomte du Noüy; Edmund Ware Sinnott; Pierre-Paul Grassé; Michael Denton teleology; teleonomy; teleometry; Darwinism; neo-Darwinian synthesis; evolution; Lecomte du Noüy; Edmund Ware Sinnott; Pierre-Paul Grassé; Michael Denton
MDPI and ACS Style

Flannery, M.A. Strong and Weak Teleology in the Life Sciences Post-Darwin. Religions 2020, 11, 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11060298

AMA Style

Flannery MA. Strong and Weak Teleology in the Life Sciences Post-Darwin. Religions. 2020; 11(6):298. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11060298

Chicago/Turabian Style

Flannery, Michael A. 2020. "Strong and Weak Teleology in the Life Sciences Post-Darwin" Religions 11, no. 6: 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11060298

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop