On the Origin and Conceptual Development of ‘Essence-Function’ (ti-yong)
Abstract‘Essence-function’ (ti-yong 體用), also called ‘substance-function,’ has been a constant topic of debate in monastic and academic communities in China. One group of scholars insists that the concept is derived from the Confucian tradition, while the other maintains that it originates with the Buddhist tradition. These opposing opinions are not merely the arguments of antiquity, but have persisted to our present time. This paper investigates the concept of ‘essence-function,’ focusing on its origin and conceptual development in the Buddhist and the Confucian traditions. This concept has become a basic framework of Chinese religions. Its root appears already in ancient Confucian and Daoist works such as the Xunzi and the Zhouyi cantong qi. It is, however, through the influence of Buddhism that ‘essence’ and ‘function’ became a paradigm used as an exegetical, hermeneutical and syncretic tool for interpreting Chinese philosophical works. This dual concept played a central role not only in the assimilation of Indian Buddhism in China during its earlier phases but also in the formation of Neo-Confucianism in medieval times. This paper shows that the paradigm constituted by ‘essence’ and ‘function’ resulted not from the doctrinal conflicts between Confucianism and Buddhism but from the interactions between them. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Kwon, S.-H.; Woo, J. On the Origin and Conceptual Development of ‘Essence-Function’ (ti-yong). Religions 2019, 10, 272.
Kwon S-H, Woo J. On the Origin and Conceptual Development of ‘Essence-Function’ (ti-yong). Religions. 2019; 10(4):272.Chicago/Turabian Style
Kwon, Sun-hyang; Woo, Jeson. 2019. "On the Origin and Conceptual Development of ‘Essence-Function’ (ti-yong)." Religions 10, no. 4: 272.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.