Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano
AbstractThere is an analogy between two types of liminality: the geographic or cultural ‘outside’ space of the Marrano Jew, alienated from his/her original religion and the one he or she has been forced to adopt, and, a philosophical position that is outside of both Athens and Jerusalem. Derrida finds and re-finds ‘h’ors- texte’, an ‘internal desert’, a ‘secret’ outside place: alien to both the western philosophical tradition and the Hebraic archive. In this liminal space he questions the otherness of the French language to which he was acculturated, and, in a turn to a less discursive modality, autobiography, finds, in the words of Helene Cixous, “the Jew-who-doesn’t know-that-he-is”. Derrida’s galut (exile) is neither Hebrew nor Greek. It is a private place outside of all discourse, which he claims, is inevitably ethnocentric. In inhabiting this outside space, he exercises the prerogative of a Marrano, equipped to critique the French language of his acculturation and the western philosophy of the scholars. French and Hebrew are irreconcilable binaries, western philosophy and his Hebrew legacy is as well. These issues will be discussed in this paper with reference to Monolingualism of the Other and Archive Fever as they augment some of his earlier work, Writing and Difference and Speech and Phenomena. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Kutash, E. Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano. Religions 2019, 10, 68.
Kutash E. Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano. Religions. 2019; 10(2):68.Chicago/Turabian Style
Kutash, Emilie. 2019. "Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano." Religions 10, no. 2: 68.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.