Next Article in Journal
A Method to Extract Measurable Indicators of Coastal Cliff Erosion from Topographical Cliff and Beach Profiles: Application to North Norfolk and Suffolk, East England, UK
Previous Article in Journal
The Accuracy of a Marine Satellite Compass under Terrestrial Urban Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ecological Function of Phenolic Compounds from Mediterranean Fucoid Algae and Seagrasses: An Overview on the Genus Cystoseira sensu lato and Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile

by
Anna Maria Mannino
1,* and
Carla Micheli
2
1
Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy
2
Department of Energy Technologies, Laboratory of Biomass and Biotechnologies for Energy, ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Research Centre Casaccia, PO Box 2400, 00123 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8010019
Submission received: 30 November 2019 / Revised: 22 December 2019 / Accepted: 31 December 2019 / Published: 1 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds from Marine Plants)

Abstract

:
Biodiversity is undergoing rapid and worrying changes, partially driven by anthropogenic activities. Human impacts and climate change (e.g., increasing temperature and ocean acidification), which act at different spatial scales, represent the most serious threats to biodiversity and ecosystem structure and function. In the Mediterranean Sea, complex systems such as fucoid algae and seagrasses, characterized by a high associated biodiversity, are regularly exposed to natural and anthropogenic pressures. These systems, particularly sensitive to a variety of stressors, evolved several physiological and biochemical traits as a response to the different pressures which they are subjected to. For instance, they produce a huge quantity of secondary metabolites such as phenolic compounds, to adapt to different environmental stressors and to defend themselves from biological pressures. These natural products are receiving increasing attention due to their possible applications in a wide range of industrial sectors. In this paper we provide an overview on the ecological role of phenolic compounds from the genus Cystoseira sensu lato and Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile, also highlighting their potential use as ecological biomarkers.

1. Introduction

Marine algae and seagrasses produce secondary metabolites to adapt and acclimate to environmental stressors, but also to defend themselves from biological pressures such as competitors, pathogens, grazers and epiphytes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The production of these metabolites is known to vary with environmental conditions (e.g., light, nutrient, and temperature), but also with geographical distribution and biological status (e.g., life cycle) [8,9,10,11].
Among secondary metabolites, phenolic compounds, carbon-based metabolites ranging from simple molecules, such as free and ester-bound phenolic acid, to more complex polymers such as condensed tannins and lignins, are commonly produced by algae and seagrasses for structural, protective and ecological purposes [4,5,6,12,13,14,15,16,17]. For instance, algae and plants living in saltworks produce and accumulate polyphenols as defense strategies to cope with these extreme environmental conditions [18].
In the Mediterranean Sea, which is a true hotspot of biodiversity [19,20,21], large, brown, fucoid algae of the genus Cystoseira sensu lato (Fucales, Phaeophyceae), according to Orellana et al. [22], and seagrasses like Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile (Posidoniaceae, Alismatales) (Figure 1), supporting high biodiversity and providing essential ecological goods and services, are valuable, productive and unique habitats [19,21,23,24]. Since the Mediterranean basin is also one of the main climate (e.g., increases of temperatures and CO2) change “hot-spots” [25] and impacted sea, these valuable communities are significantly threatened by all these pressures which are predicted to increase in the future [24,26,27].
Fucoid algae and seagrasses, particularly sensitive to a variety of stressors, evolved several physiological and biochemical traits as response to the different pressures they are subjected. For instance, they produce a huge quantity of phenolic compounds playing multiple roles [17,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Since these compounds also have several biological properties, they are receiving increasing attention due to their applications in a wide range of pharmaceutical (e.g., anticancer, antimicrobial, antifungal or anti-inflammatory), medical and industrial sectors [18,34,35,36]. Tannins are considered to be one of the most broadly distributed phenolic compound types, and among them, phlorotannins (halogenated or sulphated oligomers or polymers of phloroglucinol—1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene, Figure 2A) constitute a heterogeneous group exclusively present in brown algae, such as fucoid algae, presenting chemical structures not found in terrestrial plants [13,37,38,39,40]. Seagrasses such as P. oceanica are also rich in phenolic compounds, as testified by the presence of “tannin cells” [1,2,41,42,43].
Since these systems are susceptible to human pressures, their health status is currently considered as an indicator of the environmental quality of the coastal zone. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms these valuable communities use to respond to different stressors is crucial to predict their responses to future climate scenarios. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview on the ecological functions of phenolic compounds from the fucoid algae of the genus Cystoseira sensu lato and seagrasses like P. oceanica, also evaluating their potential use as ecological biomarkers.
The search for relevant literature, updated up to summer 2019, was carried out using standard electronic databases (Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus and Pub Med). The research criteria were based upon the following list of keywords: “Fucales”, “fucoid algae”, “Cystoseira”, “seagrasses”, “Posidonia oceanica”, “phenol”, “metabolites”, “tannin”, “function”, “role”, “ecological”, “indicator”, “markers”, “Mediterranean Sea”.

2. Genus Cystoseira sensu lato

In the Mediterranean Sea, fucoid algae are important canopy-forming algae on a rocky substrata from exposed to sheltered conditions and from the intertidal zone to more than 50 m depth [44,45,46,47,48]. Recently, Orellana et al. [22] revised the genus Cystoseira sensu lato and recognized three different genera: Cystoseira sensu stricto, Carpodesmia Greville, gen. emend., Treptacantha Kützing, gen. emend.
These communities provide food, habitat and shelter for a large number of marine organisms, and are therefore considered biological “formers” of habitat structure [49,50,51].
For these reasons these algae are listed as “of community interest” according to the European Union’s Habitat Directive (92/43/EEC) [52]. Moreover, they are under surveillance by the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), the Berne Convention (Council of Europe, 1979) [53] and the Barcelona Convention (UNEP/MAP, 2009) [54]. Since these algae are particularly sensitive to variations of environmental factors [24,55,56], the Water Framework Directive (WFD, 2000/60/EC) [57] and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD, 2008/ 56/EC) [58] considered them as reliable indicators of environmental quality in Mediterranean coastal waters [59,60]. Human pressures are increasingly limiting their distribution, and most of these algae are currently experiencing a severe decline in many Mediterranean regions [26,55,61,62,63].

2.1. Phlorotannins

Phlorotannins, exclusively present in brown algae, are biosynthesized through the acetate-malonate pathway in a Golgi apparatus and show chemical structures not found in plants [37,64]. They are mainly stored in special vesicles (physodes) within the cells. In this form they are soluble, whereas only a small amount is part of the cell wall, so phlorotannins have mainly a secondary role [4,39]. They have a wide range of molecular sizes (from 126 Da to 650 kDa) [10,13,65], and on the base of the polymerization patterns of the phloroglucinol subunits, can be divided into four distinct groups (Figure 2B–E): fuhalols and phloroethols (with ether linkages); fucols (with a phenyl linkage); fucophloroethols (with ether and phenyl linkages); eckols and carmalols (with dibenzodioxin linkages) [66,67]. Their production does not stop as the thallus gets older, but it decreases as a consequence of the thallus thickening and the decrease in photosynthesis [39]; phlorotannins also undergo turnover or degradation, and are released directly via exudation.
Fucoid algae are particularly rich in phlorotannins, that constitute up to 30% of the dry weight (DW) [13,68,69,70]. For different species belonging to the genus Cystoseira sensu lato, phlorotannins and phenolic compounds have been already isolated and identified [71]. Phlorotannins are involved in cell-wall hardening [72], function as a defense against herbivory, or for algae living in the intertidal littoral zone, as adaptation to wave exposure and periodical desiccation. They are released after the cells are damaged (as a consequence of grazing or tissue erosion). Moreover, they have a wide array of cellular (adhesion of zygotes to substrate, protection of the zygotes, wound-sealing and wound-healing) and ecological roles [4,10,39].
Phlorotannins also show antimicrobial, cytotoxic, antioxidant and antitumoral activities, and since they have up to eight interconnected rings, they are also more potent free radical scavengers than polyphenols derived from terrestrial plants [4,18,34,35,71,73,74,75]. However, since phlorotannins present a high degree of isomerization, it may be difficult to link biological activity to a particular isomer [76].

2.2. Ecological Role of Phlorotannins

Since phlorotannins vary in relation to intrinsic and extrinsic factors, their variability is particularly high [4]. But only soluble phlorotannins change with environmental conditions, as those present in the cell wall seem to be relatively stable to environmental variations [39]. Phlorotannins vary within and among species, in relation to the growth rate, the thallus morphology [4,10,34,37,77,78] (Figure 3) or age; for instance, adult thalli present longer and more complex forms, more difficult to degrade or release, than young thalli [39]. The content of soluble and cell-wall-bound phlorotannins also change within a single plant and among individuals within the population.
Phlorotannins are affected by seasons, light, depth, temperature and nutrient concentration [8,11,28,68,69,79,80,81]. They have spatial variations or vary in accordance to biotic factors [10,34,37,77]. For instance, Le Lann et al. [69] found that during the reproductive period Sargassaceae produce phenolic compounds, possibly as a chemical protection against grazers or epiphytes or against UV radiation. In Carpodesmia amentacea (C. Agardh), Orellana and Sansón (synonym Cystoseira amentacea (C. Agardh) Bory), a significant negative correlation of phenolic content with seawater temperature, was found [81]. Latitudinal differences in phlorotannin content have also been observed, with a phlorotannin production higher in species from high latitudes [37,82,83,84]. In general, the intensity of pressures (grazing, epiphytes) increases with decreasing latitude [65,85].
The content of these compounds varies seasonally, with maximal contents exhibited in summer [8,80], in winter [86], in winter and spring [81] or from late summer to the middle winter [37]. In C. amentacea, differences between years were also observed [80,81] (Figure 4). According to Mannino et al. [80], C. amentacea showed the lowest value in winter when only the main axes are present, whereas in spring, when new branches, more vulnerable, are sprouted, they significantly increased, reaching the highest value in summer, when long primary branches with numerous leaf-like structures were present. This finding is in accordance with Van Alstyne et al. [87] who found an intra-thallus distribution of these compounds, usually more concentrated in the meristematic zones, i.e., the distal extremities.
In Cystoseira baccata (S.G. Gmelin) P.C. Silva, an increase of these compounds from spring to summer was observed [69], and in summer an increase of large compounds (especially those with sizes between 2000 and 5000 Da), acting as photoprotectants compounds, was found. Indeed, large molecules have putative defense and protection roles as proved by antioxidant activity values higher than those of small compounds [88,89]. High irradiances during low tides or the high transparency in the coastal waters, which allows high penetration of both photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and ultraviolet radiation (UVR), can produce negative biological effects such as photoinhibition or DNA damage. Under high PAR and UVR, photoprotection systems are activated, for instance UV screen compounds (phlorotannins) with a strong antioxidant activity [38,79,90].
Carpodesmia tamariscifolia (Hudson) Orellana and Sansón (synonym Cystoseira tamariscifolia (Hudson) Papenfuss) has higher rich physodes, mainly located in cortical cells, which provides the photoprotection of cytoplasmic organelles [91]. In C. tamariscifolia, these compounds are accumulated mainly at the apices [9], the part of the thalli with the highest light exposure. The rapid synthesis and turnover time of these compounds observed in C. tamariscifolia might serve as photoprotective mechanisms against high irradiances [8]. Cystoseira tamariscifolia acclimates to high UVB by up-regulating UV screen substances that also act as antioxidants [92]. Their content and the antioxidant activity were highest in C. tamariscifolia in ultraoligotrophic waters with high transparency, suggesting an increase of the photoprotection capacity related to the photoacclimation to high irradiance, thus preventing the photodamage. Therefore, the alga minimizes damage from high irradiance, not only by the downregulating process in photosystems, but also by the production of UV photoprotectors and antioxidant compounds [60,92]. The release of these compounds from C. tamariscifolia thalli at noon has been suggested to be a photoprotective mechanism under high irradiance conditions [8,11]. The combination of thallus thickness, phenolic compounds (and their positive response to temperature increase), antioxidant activity and the reduction in UV penetration by the release of these compounds, might give C. tamariscifolia an advantage over other algae in high light conditions.
A decrease in soluble phlorotannins with high nutrient levels was observed, and such effect was often explained by the fact that nutrient enrichment commonly leads to an increase in growth [93], which, in turn, causes shading followed by the decrease in soluble phlorotannin production. But in C. tamariscifolia a higher content when nitrate levels were high has been observed [11]. In C. tamariscifolia increased irradiance in spring enhanced productivity, antioxidant activity and the production of photoprotective compounds, but in summer nutrient depletion due to thermal stratification of coastal waters reduces photosynthetic activity and the photoprotective capacity of the alga [60]. In spring, the alga uses photosynthetic energy both for the accumulation of carbon compounds to store energy and to build up photoprotective compounds.
Phlorotannins also function as a chelating agent of toxic heavy metal ions [94]. Their increase in the cell-wall, together with the increase in their exudation in the surrounding water, could prevent the copper from entering and damaging the photosynthetic apparatus allowing the seaweeds to tolerate high copper contamination [95].
Ocean acidification is expected to increase algal productivity, boost antioxidant activity and increase production of photoprotective compounds [96]. Under elevated pCO2 conditions an increase in the biomass of C. tamariscifolia has been observed, but only at optimal temperature conditions and also if nutrients were sufficiently available. In Cystoseira compressa (Esper) Gerloff and Nizamuddin, these compounds increase under high pCO2 levels independently from temperature, highlighting that the ocean acidification can positively affect algal photoprotection [97].
The bathymetric level, acting on the herbivore pressure, affects their content. Differences in bathymetric level also imply differences in water movement that have direct effects on herbivore pressure. Grazing pressure is generally lowest in wave-exposed shores where the feeding ability of consumers is limited to calm periods [98]. Therefore, in the infralittoral fringe a greater water movement makes feeding on algae more difficult than in the constantly submerged zones. Indeed, in C. amentacea inhabiting the infralittoral fringe, a lower content than that found in infralittoral species such as Dictyopteris polypodioides (A.P. De Candolle) J.V. Lamouroux, suggests that the last one invests more resources in defensive metabolites due to a higher grazer pressure [78] (Figure 4). Phlorotannins also induce resistance to grazing [99]. Induced resistance (increase of phlorotannins) decreases grazing pressure by deterring herbivores (grazed algae avoids future clipping from grazers which prefer ungrazed algae), as well as impairing their performance [100]. Increased excretion of phlorotannins into the water as a consequence of the feeding process was also observed [39]. A fraction of phlorotannins is released as a consequence of stress conditions such as grazing, but another fraction is regularly released into the surrounding water [39,101,102].
Reductions in their content might be related to phlorotannin exudation but also to polymerization of these molecules into more complex forms, difficult to degrade [39]. Herbivore pressure varies also in relation to thallus morphology. Sheet algae (D. polypodioides), resulting more palatable than leathery (C. amentacea) or crustose ones [103,104], are expected to produce a higher amount of these compounds [80].
The bathymetric level, however, also affects exposure to solar radiation. For Cystoseira sensu latu species inhabiting the infralittoral fringe and subjected to regular even if incomplete emersion of the thalli, which implies a direct exposure to solar radiation, a higher content of these compounds as compared with those of species inhabiting the continually submerged zone, is expected [105]. Instead, in C. amentacea and in C. compressa, inhabiting the infralittoral fringe, a lower value than D. polypodioides, inhabiting the continually submerged zone, was found [78]. Connan et al. [79] reported a higher content of these compounds in brown algae growing at mid-tide level compared to that of species inhabiting either the low-tide level or the upper mid-littoral fringe. The authors hypothesized that other mechanisms of photoprotection exist, such as carotenoids, which might act together with these compounds. Thus, the stressing condition of the emersion phases does not necessarily result in an increase of these compounds. Moreover, Le Lann et al. [70] found a decrease in the content of small molecular weight (<2000 Da) in relation to an increase within the depth, hypothesizing a possible photoprotectant role for small compounds.

3. Posidonia oceanica

Seagrasses, flowering and rhizomatous plants exclusively living in marine habitats, are key coastal species which provide valuable ecological services, oxygen production, sinks for CO2 emissions, sediment stabilization and coastal protection from erosion [106,107]. They support valuable ecosystems, characterized by high productivity and associated biodiversity, having a potentially significant role also in climate change mitigation [108]. Seagrasses, belonging to the monocotyledonous order Alismatales and assigned to four different families Cymodoceaceae, Hydrocharitaceae, Posidoniaceae, and Zosteraceae [109,110], form worldwide extensive meadows in coastal systems except for Antarctica [109]. Seagrasses live in a wide geographical range and are limited to the coastal continental shelf (0-45 m). Five of the total number of seagrass species are found in the Mediterranean Sea, precisely P. oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Ascherson, Zostera marina L., Z. noltii Hornemann and Halophila stipulacea (Forsskål) Ascherson (non-indigenous species).
Posidonia oceanica, the dominant endemic seagrass species in the Mediterranean Sea, plays a crucial ecological role in the coastal zones of tropical and temperate seas, providing food and habitat for a large number of associated organisms [111,112]. Posidonia oceanica, a plant with a slow growth rate and low genetic diversity, forms meadows which represent, on soft bottoms, the ecosystems with the greatest primary productivity, part of which is exported to neighboring systems. Posidoniaoceanica can grow in extraordinarily diverse environmental conditions [113], thanks to physiological and morphological adaptations which sometimes only endemic species possess. Posidonia oceanica was included by the European Union’s Habitat Directive (92/43/CEE) among the habitats of priority interest [114], and is protected under the Bern and the Barcelona Conventions, and other legislations at a national level. Due to its high sensitivity, P. oceanica is considered as a biological indicator of environmental quality [115]. Recently, the MFSD (2008/56/EC) [58] selected P. oceanica as representative species of the angiosperm quality elements for the Mediterranean marine environment. Despite all that, P. oceanica habitats are experiencing decline or loss throughout the Mediterranean, often due to synergies among multiple stressors, mainly of anthropogenic origin, which are particularly threatening slow-growing species, such as seagrasses [27,116,117].

3.1. Phenolic Compounds

In seagrasses, phenolic compounds are produced via the Shikimic Acid Pathway in specialized cells called “tannin cells” [42,118]. Small molecules are able to rapidly diffuse across cell membranes to reach intracellular sites or remain as pigments in the senescent phase of the cell, whereas several larger polyphenols, biosynthesized in situ from smaller polyphenols to non-hydrolyzable tannins, remain not detected in the plant matrix [119].
These compounds are produced to function as defense mechanisms, in response to stress conditions, such as abiotic factors, non-indigenous species (NIS), competitors, predators and pathogens [2]. Before the appearance of damage, P. oceanica can activate self-protection mechanisms, involving, for instance, phenolic compounds [29,120]. Polyphenols act through the release and suppression of growth hormones such as auxin, as UV screens to protect against ionizing radiation and to provide coloration (plant pigments), as a deterrent to herbivores, in the prevention of microbial infections (phytoalexins), as signaling molecules in ripening and in other growth processes [121]. Polyphenols also have a significant binding affinity for proteins, thus leading to the formation of soluble and insoluble protein–phenolic complexes [122], which influence the accessibility and activity of phenolic compounds [123].
Currently, various phenolic compounds were identified in P. oceanica [1,2,41,42,124,125]. In P. oceanica leaves, tannins account for ca. 5–10% [15], whereas 2% of the dry weight of leaves corresponds to free or ester-bound phenols [2,3,126]. The remaining amount of phenols is poorly understood. Agostini et al. [2] identified a total of 23 compounds in P. oceanica. Of these, 20 are phenolic and cinnamic acid derivatives. Leaves are rich in chicoric, caftaric and gentisic acids, but other phenols, such as the aldehyde vanillin, and p-coumaric, ferulic, caffeic and cinnamic acids, and phenol derivatives (e.g., phloroglucinol), benzoic acid derivatives, calchones and proanthocyanidins are present [6,127] (Figure 5). In leaves, different compounds resulted as main components, for instance, ferulic acid [2,125] or p-hydroxy benzoic acid [124] or gentisic acid [14].
Even though seagrasses are supported by the hydraulic forces of the water body, lignin was detected in several tissue types and several cells, and variations of the lignin content in relation to the morphotype and life style of the seagrass were observed [128,129]. Lignin is particularly abundant in P. oceanica, with a higher content in roots and rhizomes than in leaves [130]. The lignin, a typical constituent of angiosperm ancestors, would contribute to the longevity of the tissue by protecting it against microbial attack, even if its deposition is restricted to tissues that show limited growth.

3.2. Ecological Role of Phenolic Compounds

Among the Mediterranean seagrasses, P. oceanica is the most thoroughly investigated from the phytochemical point of view [6]. Several studies analyzed the role that phenolic compounds have in the response of P. oceanica to different environmental pressures: e.g., turbidity and pollution, ocean acidification, competition, pathogen infection and overgrazing [2,15,29,30,42,120,125,131,132,133]. For instance, high phenol concentrations were found in P. oceanica leaves when exposed to contamination by metals and proximity to intensive fish aquaculture [42,134].
A negative relation between grazing pressure and phenols was found [135]; indeed, tannins are known to reduce palatability and increase the toxicity to herbivores [10]. The increase of phenols in response to grazing was also explained as a defense mechanism against infection, since grazing provides an opening for pathogenic organisms [136]. Moreover, Dumay et al. [42] observed that in P. oceanica the number of the tannin cells changed in response to herbivores. Furthermore, Cozza et al. [137] observed a variation in the typology of the phenolic compounds in tannin cells, in response to environmental injuries. Seagrasses produce several types of phenolic compounds (e.g., phenolic acids, condensed tannins and lignins), thus a specific class of phenolic substances could be involved in the response mechanisms of P. oceanica. Phenolic compounds also act as metal chelators, providing an internal detoxification mechanism against heavy metals [2] and key allelopathic agents [42]. Posidonia oceanica is able to accumulate significant amounts of heavy metals, and this accumulation is responsible for a reduction in total phenolic compound content [133]. Moreover, they are also involved in the cell-wall hardening [42].
The production of phenolic compounds changes in relation to species, growth phase and environmental conditions, and it is also genetically controlled. Haznedaroglu and Zeybek [14], for instance, found in young leaves a higher quantity of chicoric acid. In the marine realm, the genetic variability and phenotypic plasticity of the species confer an adaptive mechanism to environmental disturbances by producing, for instance, secondary metabolites, which allow for an efficient plant acclimation [16,29,138]. The changes in phenol metabolism could be a result of the adaptation to the marine environment [129]. Posidonia oceanica, in the presence of competitors such as Caulerpa taxifolia (M. Vahl) C. Agardh, apparently invests in defense rather than growth [15,42,125]. It would favor the synthesis of secondary metabolites through an increase in the number of tannin cells, thus supporting the idea that phenolic compounds are involved in defense against pathogens and allelopathy [15,42,118].
Since the changes in phenolic compounds represent a response to environmental stressors, they can be used to screen the P. oceanica health status during the regular monitoring programs carried out for management purposes [16,17,113,116,132,139,140]. Two promising tools (easy, rapid and inexpensive): phenolic compounds in rhizome and Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in leaves, were recently proposed to monitor the health state of P. oceanica meadows [17,116,132]. In fact, phenolic compounds represent a generic response to different environmental stress related not only to extrinsic (seasons) and intrinsic (metabolism) factors, but also to the genetic variation of the plants. RAPD markers have been used to assess the pattern of genetic diversity and the genetic structure for the conservation of endangered plants, revealing a decreased genetic diversity in P. oceanica meadows along an anthropogenic disturbance gradient, both at small, e.g., within a meadow, and at Mediterranean scale [116].
Recently, the conservation status of the P. oceanica meadow at two protected areas, S. Marinella (SIC “Situ of Community Importance”, Central Tyrrhenian Sea), situated 100 km far from Rome (Italy), and Monterosso a Mare (Northern Tyrrhenian Sea), were evaluated through a biochemical/genetic approach: phenolic compounds and Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers [17,29,132]. A high quantity of polyphenols was found at Santa Marinella, where P. oceanica was ranked as a disturbed one. This low ranking was confirmed by the mean phenol content, quite high and scattered, and the low genetic variability, with a very high similarity of specimens at a local scale [132,140]. Moreover, in the Talamone meadow (Florence, Italy), judged as “well preserved”, phenol content was lower than in Santa Marinella plants [132].
At Monterosso a Mare, the mean total content showed a significant seasonal variation, with higher concentration in summer than in winter [17]. The significant phenol content increase in summer could be related to disturbance events. Therefore, in P. oceanica the variation in the production of polyphenols within the meadow would reflect not only the impact of multiple anthropogenic stressors (e.g., vessel traffic, pollution), but also the variation of abiotic and biotic factors during the seasons [17,29,132]. These differences account for changes in metabolic/physiological pathways as an adaptation to stress and extrinsic factors like seasonal variations in temperature. In leaves, total phenol concentration also varies seasonally due to the leaves’ short lifespan and with depth [42]. On the contrary, levels of synthesis and accumulation of phenolic compounds were more stable in rhizomes [29]. A higher concentration of phenols in the intermediate leaves of P. oceanica was observed during winter, when growth conditions are limiting [15,42,120,133,141]. Consequently, in P. oceanica the growth process seems to dominate the defense process when the environmental factors are favorable for growth [142,143].
Changes in CO2 concentrations modify the capacity of plants to resist or tolerate herbivory [144]. According to the resource availability hypothesis (RAH, [145]), seagrasses growing under elevated nutrient availability will reduce the production of chemical defenses such as phenols [146,147]. Since CO2 can greatly limit primary production in seagrasses [148,149], under high CO2 scenarios a decrease in phenolics would be expected, following RAH. In P. oceanica plants, a decrease [30,150,151], as well as no changes [147] in phenolic compounds, have been reported, with a consequent increased feeding of a wide range of consumers, including fishes and sea urchins [30,150,151,152]. Under high CO2, a decrease in phenolic compounds was also observed in the seeds of P. oceanica, which were bigger, with higher carbon content and more stored sucrose [152]. Having more resources (i.e., CO2) available, they invest less on defense, favoring the storage of more rapidly available carbon-based compounds such as sucrose [153].

4. Conclusions

The Mediterranean is currently experiencing decline and/or loss in the number of species and a deterioration of habitats, mainly related to the increase of human activities and global change [19,21,154,155,156,157]. The high sensitivity of valuable and productive habitats, such as the genus Cystoseira sensu latu and P. oceanica meadow, makes them particularly vulnerable and susceptible to human pressures. Since human stressors are expected to increase in the coming decades, a strong effort at the global scale is required in order to establish and/or implement effective conservation plans for these sensitive and fragile ecosystems [158]. To support the sustainable management of these ecosystems, continuous monitoring of their health status and their changing over time is essential. Since these systems are able to provide an early warning of suffering or decline and deteriorating environmental quality [23,159,160], they can act as a benchmark for monitoring the environmental health of marine systems [17].
Biomonitoring is an expensive and time-consuming activity, and thus the appropriate choice of indicators is essential. Consequently, the identification of effective and sensitive diagnostic tools and measurable descriptors suitable for monitoring the health status of marine systems is a critical issue. Since the synthesis and storage of phenolic compounds in Cystoseira sensu latu and P. oceanica change in response to variations of several abiotic and biotic factors, they could be considered as the potential valuable markers of stress conditions. The punctual response of phenols to several stress conditions seems to support its feasibility as an early warning indicator. Moreover, the inexpensiveness of these approaches makes it easy to introduce them in meadows monitoring.
Recently, biochemical and genetic approaches have been proposed as suitable and convenient biomarkers of the health status of P. oceanica and/or other seagrasses. Indeed, they allow us to depict plant physiological stress and environmental disturbance as well as traditional methods can [17]. High levels of total phenols, together with the low genetic variability (as RAPD markers), identified endangered P. oceanica meadows, perfectly in line with the results of traditional methods (density, leaf biometry).
However, even though in P. oceanica phenolic compounds changes which are in response to environmental pressures are well known [15,29,30], yet they are still scarcely considered as environmental biomarkers in monitoring plans.
Even if additional researches are necessary to define thresholds for classifying the different level of perturbation, the obtained results open interesting perspectives on the application of the phenol content in Cystoseira sensu latu and P. oceanica as possible biomarkers of environmental quality. In monitoring surveys, the assessment of health marine ecosystems should make provision for multidisciplinary investigations [161,162] and multiparametric approaches, including physiological biomarkers, biomarkers of general stress and more specific biomarkers [131], but also molecular ones [16,27,140,163].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, validation, resources, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, A.M.M. and C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zapata, O.; McMillan, C. Phenolic acids in seagrasses. Aquat. Bot. 1979, 7, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agostini, S.; Desjobert, J.M.; Pergent, G. Distribution of phenolic compounds in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Phytochemistry 1998, 48, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Heglmeier, A.; Zidorn, C. Secondary metabolites of Posidonia oceanica (Posidoniaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 964–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stiger-Pouvreau, V.; Jégou, C.; Cérantola, S.; Guérard, F.; Le Lann, K. Phlorotannins from Sargassaceae species: Interesting molecules for ecophysiological and valorisation purposes. Adv. Bot. Res. 2014, 71, 379–412. [Google Scholar]
  5. Grignon-Dubois, M.; Rezzonico, B. Phenolic fingerprint of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica from four locations in the Mediterranean Sea: First evidence for the large predominance of chicoric acid. Bot. Mar. 2015, 58, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zidorn, C. Secondary metabolities of seagrasses (Alismatales and Potamogetonales; Alismatidae): Chemical diversity, bioactivity, and ecological function. Phytochemistry 2016, 124, 5–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mekinić, I.G.; Skroza, D.; Šimat, V.; Hamed, I.; Čagalj, M.; Perković, Z.P. Phenolic Content of Brown Algae (Phaeophyceae) Species: Extraction, Identification, and Quantification. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Abdala-Díaz, R.T.; Cabello-Pasini, A.; Pérez-Rodríguez, E.; Conde Álvarez, R.M.; Figueroa, F.L. Daily and seasonal variations of optimum quantum yield and phenolic compounds in Cystoseira tamariscifolia (Phaeophyta). Mar. Biol. 2006, 148, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdala-Díaz, R.; Cabello-Pasini, A.; Márquez-Garrido, E.; Figueroa, F.L. Intrathallus variation of phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and phenolsulfatase activity in Cystoseira tamariscifolia (Phaeophyceae) from southern Spain. Cienc. Mar. 2014, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Amsler, C.D.; Fairhead, V.A. Defensive and sensory chemical ecology of brown algae. Adv. Bot. Res. 2006, 43, 1–91. [Google Scholar]
  11. Celis-Plá, P.S.M.; Martínez, B.; Quintano, E.; García-Sánchez, M.; Pedersen, A.; Navarro, N.P.; Copertino, M.S.; Mangaiyarkarasi, N.; Mariath, R.; Figueroa, F.L.; et al. Short-term ecophysiological and biochemical responses of Cystoseira tamariscifolia and Ellisolandia elongata to changes in solar irradiance and nutrient levels. Aquat. Biol. 2014, 22, 227–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Constabel, C.P. A survey of herbivore-inducible defensive proteins and phytochemicals. In Induced Plant Defenses against Pathogens and Herbivores; Agrawal, A.A., Tuzun, S., Bent, E., Eds.; APS Press: St Paul, MN, USA, 1999; pp. 137–166. [Google Scholar]
  13. Targett, N.M.; Arnold, T.M. Effects of secondary metabolites on digestion in marine herbivores. In Marine Chemical Ecology; McClintock, J.B., Baker, B.J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; pp. 391–411. [Google Scholar]
  14. Haznedaroglu, M.Z.; Zeybek, U. HPLC determination of chicoric acid in leaves of Posidonia oceanica. Pharm. Biol. 2007, 45, 745–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pergent, G.; Boudouresque, C.F.; Dumay, D.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Wyllie-Echeverria, S. Competition between the invasive macrophyte Caulerpa taxifolia and the seagrass Posidonia oceanica: Contrasting strategies. BMC Ecol. 2008, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Micheli, C.; Cupido, R.; Lombardi, C.; Belmonte, A.; Peirano, A. Changes in genetic structure of Posidonia oceanica at Monterosso al Mare (Ligurian Sea) and its resilience over a decade (1998–2009). Environ. Manag. 2012, 50, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rotini, A.; Belmonte, A.; Barrote, I.; Micheli, C.; Peirano, A.; Santos, R.O.; Silva, J.; Migliore, L. Effectiveness and consistency of a suite of descriptors for assessing the ecological status of seagrass meadows (Posidonia oceanica L. Delile). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2013, 130, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Messina, C.M.; Renda, G.; Laudicella, V.A.; Trepos, R.; Fauchon, M.; Hellio, C.; Santulli, A. From Ecology to Biotechnology, Study of the Defense Strategies of Algae and Halophytes (from Trapani Saltworks, NW Sicily) with a Focus on Antioxidants and Antimicrobial Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Coll, M.; Piroddi, C.; Steenbeek, J.; Kaschner, K.; Ben Rais Lasram, F.; Aguzzi, J.; Ballesteros, E.; Bianchi, C.N.; Corbera, J.; Dailianis, T.; et al. The biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea: Estimates, patterns and threats. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Coll, M.; Piroddi, C.; Albouy, C.; Ben Rais Lasram, F.; Cheung, W.W.L.; Christensen, V.; Karpouzi, V.S.; Guilhaumon, F.; Mouillot, D.; Paleczny, M.; et al. The Mediterranean Sea under siege: Spatial overlap between marine biodiversity, cumulative threats and marine reserves. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lejeusne, C.; Chevaldonne, P.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Boudouresque, C.F.; Perez, T. Climate change effects on a miniature ocean: The highly diverse, highly impacted Mediterranean Sea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Orellana, S.; Hernández, M.; Sansón, M. Diversity of Cystoseira sensu lato (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean based on morphological and DNA evidence, including Carpodesmia gen. emend. and Treptacantha gen. emend. Eur. J. Phycol. 2019, 54, 447–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pergent, G.; Bazairi, H.; Bianchi, C.; Boudouresque, C.F.; Buia, M.C.; Calvo, S.; Clabaut, P.; Harmelin-Vivien, M.; Mateo, M.; Montefalcone, M.; et al. Climate change and Mediterranean seagrass meadows: A synopsis for environmental managers. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2014, 15, 462–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Mineur, F.; Arenas, F.; Assis, J.; Davies, A.J.; Engelen, A.H.; Fernandes, F.; Malta, E.-J.; Thibaut, T.; Nguyen, T.V.; Vaz-Pinto, F.; et al. European seaweeds under pressure: Consequences for communities and ecosystem functioning. J. Sea Res. 2015, 98, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Giorgi, F. Climate change hot-spots. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33, L08707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thibaut, T.; Pinedo, S.; Torras, X.; Ballesteros, E. Long-term decline of the populations of Fucales (Cystoseira, Sargassum) in the Albères coast (northwestern Mediterranean). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 50, 1472–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ceccherelli, G.; Oliva, S.; Pinna, S.; Piazzi, L.; Procaccini, G.; Marin-Guirao, L.; Dattolo, E.; Gallia, R.; La Manna, G.; Gennaro, P.; et al. Seagrass collapse due to synergistic stressors is not anticipated by phenological changes. Oecologia 2018, 186, 1137–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Stiger, V.; Deslandes, E.; Payri, C.E. Phenolic contents of two brown algae, Turbinaria ornata and Sargassum mangarevense on Tahiti (French Polynesia): Interspecific, ontogenic and spatio-temporal variations. Bot. Mar. 2004, 47, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Migliore, L.; Rotini, A.; Randazzo, D.; Albanese, N.N.; Giallongo, A. Phenol contents and 2D electrophoresis protein pattern: A promising tool to monitor Posidonia meadow health state. BMC Ecol. 2007, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Arnold, T.; Mealey, C.; Leahey, H.; Miller, A.W.; Hall Spencer, J.M.; Milazzo, M.; Maers, K. Ocean acidification and the loss of phenolic substances in marine plants. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sathya, R.; Kanaga, N.; Sankar, P.; Jeeva, S. Antioxidant properties of phlorotannins from brown seaweed Cystoseira trinodis (Forsskål) C. Agardh. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10 (Suppl. 2), S2608–S2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Dang, T.T.; Bowyer, M.C.; Van Altena, I.A.; Scarlett, C.J. Comparison of chemical profile and antioxidant properties of the brown algae. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 53, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lemesheva, V.; Tarakhovskaya, E. Physiological functions of phlorotannins. Biol. Commun. 2018, 63, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lopes, G.; Sousa, C.; Silva, L.R.; Pinto, E.; Andrade, P.B.; Bernando, J.; Mouga, T.; Valentão, P. Can phlorotannins purified extracts constitute a novel pharmacological alternative for microbial infections with associated inflammatory conditions? PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Abdelhamid, A.; Jouini, M.; Amor, H.B.H.; Mzoughi, Z.; Dridi, M.; Said, R.F.; Bouraoui, A. Phytochemical analysis and evaluation of the antioxidant, anti-Inflammatory, and antinociceptive potential of phlorotannin-rich fractions from three Mediterranean brown seaweeds. Mar. Biotechnol. 2018, 20, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Farvin, K.H.S.; Surendraraj, A.; Al-Ghunaim, A.; Al-Yamani, F. Chemical profile and antioxidant activities of 26 selected species of seaweeds from Kuwait coast. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 2653–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ragan, M.A.; Glombitza, K.W. Phlorotannins, brown alga polyphenols. Prog. Phycol. Res. 1986, 4, 129–241. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pavia, H.; Cervin, G.; Lindgren, A.; Aberg, P. Effects of UV-B radiation and simulated herbivory on phlorotannins in the brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1997, 157, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koivikko, R.; Loponen, J.; Honkanen, T.; Jormalainen, V. Contents of soluble, cell-wall-bound and exuded phlorotannins in the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus, with implications on their ecological functions. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 195–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Freile-Pelegrín, Y.; Robledo, D. Bioactive phenolic compounds from algae. In Bioactive Compounds from Marine Foods: Plants and Animal Sources; Hernandez-Ledesma, B., Herrero, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 113–129. [Google Scholar]
  41. Arnold, T.M.; Targett, N.M. Marine tannins: The importance of a mechanistic framework for predicting ecological roles. J. Chem. Ecol. 2002, 28, 1919–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dumay, O.; Costa, J.; Desjobert, J.M.; Pergent, G. Variations in the concentration of phenolic compounds in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica under conditions of competition. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 3211–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sieg, R.D.; Kubanek, J. Chemical Ecology of Marine Angiosperms: Opportunities at the Interface of Marine and Terrestrial Systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 687–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Giaccone, G.; Bruni, A. Le Cistoseire e la vegetazione sommersa del Mediterraneo. Atti Ist. Veneto Sci. Lett. Arti 1973, 131, 59–103. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ballesteros, E. Structure and dynamics of the community of Cystoseira zosteroides (Turner) C. Agardh (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in the Northwestern Mediterranean. Sci. Mar. 1990, 54, 217–229. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hereu, B.; Mangialajo, L.; Ballesteros, E.; Thibaut, T. On the occurrence, structure and distribution of deep-water Cystoseira (Phaeophyceae) populations in the Port-Cros National Park (Northwestern Mediterranean). Eur. J. Phycol. 2008, 43, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sales, M.; Ballesteros, E. Shallow Cystoseira (Fucales: Ochrophyta) assemblages thriving in sheltered areas from Menorca (NW Mediterranean): Relationships with environmental factors and anthropogenic pressures. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2009, 84, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nikolić, V.; Žuljević, A.; Mangialajo, L.; Antolić, B.; Kušpilić, G.; Ballesteros, E. Cartography of littoral rocky-shore communities (CARLIT) as a tool for ecological quality assessment of coastal waters in the Eastern Adriatic Sea. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 34, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Graham, M.H. Effects of local deforestation on the diversity and structure of southern California giant kelp forest food webs. Ecosystems 2004, 7, 341–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sales, M.; Ballesteros, E. Long-term comparison of algal assemblages dominated by Cystoseira crinita (Fucales, Heterokontophyta) from Cap Corse (Corsica, North Western Mediterranean). Eur. J. Phycol. 2010, 45, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martínez, B.; Arenas, F.; Trilla, A.; Viejo, R.M.; Carreño, F. Combining physiological threshold knowledge to species distribution models is key to improving forecasts of the future niche for macroalgae. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 1422–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. EEC, 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Off. J. Eur. Union 1992, 206, 7–50. [Google Scholar]
  53. Council of Europe. Convention Relative à La Conservation De La Vie Sauvage Et Du Milieu Naturel de L’Europe; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  54. UNEP/MAP. Report of the 16th Ordinary Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and its Protocols, Marrakesh, Morocco, 3–5 November 2009; Mediterranean Action Plan: Athens, Greece, 2009; p. 321. [Google Scholar]
  55. Thibaut, T.; Blanfuné, A.; Boudouresque, C.F.; Verlaque, M. Decline and local extinction of Fucales in French Riviera: The harbinger of future extinctions? Medit. Mar. Sci. 2015, 16, 206–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Blanfuné, A.; Boudouresque, C.F.; Verlaque, M.; Thibaut, T. The fate of Cystoseira crinita, a forest-forming Fucale (Phaeophyceae, Stramenopiles), in France (North Western Mediterranean Sea). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016, 181, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. EC, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community actions in the field of water policy. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2000, 22, 1–73. [Google Scholar]
  58. European Commission. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for Community actions in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Off. J. Eur. Communities 2008, 164, 19–40. [Google Scholar]
  59. Orlando-Bonaca, M.; Lipej, L.; Malej, A.; Francé, J.; Cermelj, B.; Bajt, O.; Kovac, N.; Mavric, B.; Turk, V.; Mozetic, P.; et al. Izbor Elementov Za Vzpostavitev Programa Spremljanja Stanja Morskega Okolja (po členu 11 ODMS) = Selection of Elements to Establish the Monitoring Program of the Marine Environment (Article 11 MSFD). In National Report in Slovenian; Porocila MBP, 144; Marine Biology Station Piran, National Institute of Biology: Piran, Slovenia, 2013; p. 29. [Google Scholar]
  60. Celis-Plá, P.S.M.; Bouzon, Z.L.; Hall-Spencer, J.M.; Schmidt, E.C.; Korbee, N.; Figueroa, F.L. Seasonal biochemical and photophysiological responses in the intertidal macroalga Cystoseira tamariscifolia (Ochrophyta). Mar. Environ. Res. 2016, 115, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Mangialajo, L.; Chiantore, M.; Cattaneo-Vietti, R. Loss of fucoid algae along a gradient of urbanisation, and structure of benthic assemblages. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 358, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Strain, E.M.A.; Thomson, R.J.; Micheli, F.; Mancuso, F.P.; Airoldi, L. Identifying the interacting roles of stressors in driving the global loss of canopy-forming to mat-forming algae in marine ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 3300–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Iveša, L.; Djakovac, T.; Devescovi, M. Long-term fluctuations in Cystoseira populations along the west Istrian Coast (Croatia) related to eutrophication patterns in the northern Adriatic Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 106, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Singh, I.P.; Bharate, S.B. Phloroglucinol compounds of natural origin. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 558–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Targett, N.M.; Arnold, T.M. Minireview-predicting the effects of brown algal phlorotannins on marine herbivores in tropical and temperate oceans. J. Phycol. 1998, 34, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Barre, S.; Potin, P.; Leblanc, C.; Delage, L. The halogenated metabolism of brown algae (Phaeophyta), its biological importance and its environmental significance. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 988–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Martínez, J.H.; Castañeda, H.G. Preparation and chromatographic analysis of phlorotannins. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2013, 51, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Plouguerné, E.; Le Lann, K.; Connan, S.; Jechoux, G.; Deslandes, E.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V. Spatial and seasonal variation in density, reproductive status, length and phenolic content of the invasive brown macroalga Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt along the coast of Western Brittany (France). Aquat. Bot. 2006, 85, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Le Lann, K.; Connan, S.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V. Phenology, TPC and size-fractioning phenolics variability in temperate Sargassaceae (Phaeophyceae, Fucales) from Western Brittany: Native vs. introduced species. Mar. Environ. Res. 2012, 80, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Le Lann, K.; Ferret, C.; VanMee, E.; Spagnol, C.; Lhuillery, M.; Payri, C.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V. Total phenolic, size-fractionated phenolics and fucoxanthin content of tropical Sargassaceae (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) from the South Pacific Ocean: Spatial and specific variability. Phycol. Res. 2012, 60, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bruno de Sousa, C.; Gangadhar, K.N.; Macridachis, J.; Pavão, M.; Morais, T.R.; Campino, L.; Varela, J.; Lago, J.H.G. Cystoseira algae (Fucaceae): Update on their chemical entities and biological activities. Tetrahedron 2017, 28, 1486–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Schoenwaelder, M.E.A.; Wiencke, C. Phenolic compounds in the embryo development of several northern hemisphere fucoids. Plant Biol. 2000, 2, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ferreres, F.; Lopes, G.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Andrade, P.B.; Sousa, C.; Mouga, T.; Valentão, P. Phlorotannin extracts from fucales characterized by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn: Approaches to hyaluronidase inhibitory capacity and antioxidant properties. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 2766–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Vizetto-Duarte, C.; Custódio, L.; Acosta, G.; Lago, J.H.G.; Morais, T.R.; Bruno de Sousa, C.; Gangadhar, K.N.; Rodrigues, M.J.; Pereira, H.; Lima, R.T.; et al. Can macroalgae provide promising anti-tumoral compounds? A closer look at Cystoseira tamariscifolia as a source for antioxidant and anti-hepatocarcinoma compounds. PeerJ 2016, 4, e1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sellimi, S.; Benslima, A.; Barragan-Montero, V.; Hajji, M.; Nasri, M. Polyphenolic-protein-polysaccharide ternary conjugates from Cystoseira barbata Tunisian seaweed as potential biopreservatives: Chemical, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 1375–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Heffernan, N.; Brunton, N.P.; FitzGerald, R.J.; Smyth, T.J. Profiling of the molecular weight and structural isomer abundance of macroalgae-derived phlorotannins. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 509–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Van Alstyne, K.L.; Whitman, S.L.; Ehlig, J.M. Differences in herbivore preferences, phlorotannin production, and nutritional quality between juvenile and adult tissues from marine brown algae. Mar. Biol. 2001, 139, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mannino, A.M.; Vaglica, V.; Oddo, E. Interspecific variation in total phenol content in temperate brown algae. J. Biol. Res. 2017, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Connan, S.; Goulard, F.; Stiger, V.; Deslandes, E.; Ar Gall, E. Interspecific and temporal variation in phlorotannin levels in an assemblage of brown algae. Bot. Mar. 2004, 47, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mannino, A.M.; Vaglica, V.; Oddo, E. Seasonal variation in total phenolic content of Dyctiopteris polypodioides (Dictyotaceae) from the Sicilian coast. Flora Mediterr. 2014, 24, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mannino, A.M.; Vaglica, V.; Cammarata, M.; Oddo, E. Effects of temperature on total phenolic compounds in Cystoseira amentacea (C. Agardh) Bory (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) from southern Mediterranean. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Steinberg, P.D.; Paul, V.J. Fish feeding and chemical defenses of tropical brown algae in Western Australia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1990, 58, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Van Alstyne, K.L.; Paul, V.J. The Biogeography of polyphelonic compounds in marine macroalgae: Temperate brown algal defenses deter feeding by tropical herbivorous fishes. Oceanologia 1990, 84, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ank, G.; da Gama, B.A.P.; Pereira, R.C. Latitudinal variation in phlorotannin contents from Southwestern Atlantic brown seaweeds. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Railkin, A.I. Marine Biofouling: Colonization Processes and Defenses; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; p. 320. [Google Scholar]
  86. Ragan, M.A.; Jensen, A. Quantitative studies on brown algal phenols. II. Seasonal variation in polyphenol content of Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. and Fucus vesiculosus (L.). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1978, 34, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Van Alstyne, K.L.; Mccarthy, J.J., III; Hustead, C.L.; Kearns, L.J. Phlorotannin allocation among tissues of northeastern pacific kelps and rockweeds. J. Phycol. 1999, 35, 482–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cérantola, S.; Breton, F.; Gall, E.A.; Deslandes, E. Co-occurrence and antioxidant activities of fucol and fucophlorethol classes of polymeric phenols in Fucus spiralis. Bot. Mar. 2006, 49, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Breton, F.; Cerantola, S.; Ar Gall, E. Distribution and radical scavenging activity of phenols in Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyceae). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2011, 399, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cruces, E.; Huovinen, P.; Gómez, I. Phlorotannin and antioxidant responses upon short-term exposure to UV radiation and elevated temperature in three South Pacific kelps. Photochem. Photobiol. 2012, 88, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Schoenwaelder, M.E.A. The biology of phenolic containing vesicles. Algae 2008, 23, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Figueroa, F.L.; Domínguez-Gonzalez, B.; Korbee, N. Vulnerability and acclimation to increased UVB in the three intertidal macroalgae of different morpho-functional groups. Mar. Environ. Res. 2014, 97, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Jormalainen, V.; Honkanen, T.; Koivikko, R.; Eränen, J. Induction of phlorotannin production in a brown alga: Defense or resource dynamics? Oikos 2003, 103, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Karez, C.S.; Pereira, R.C. Metal contents in polyphenolic fractions extracted from the brown alga Padina gymnospora. Bot. Mar. 1995, 38, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Connan, S.; Stengel, D.B. Impacts of ambient salinity and copper on brown algae: 2. Interactive effects on phenolic pool and assessment of metal binding capacity of phlorotannin. Aquat. Toxicol. 2011, 104, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Celis-Plá, P.S.M.; Martínez, B.; Korbee, N.; Hall-Spencer, J.M.; Figueroa, F.L. Ecophysiological responses to elevated CO2 and temperature in Cystoseira tamariscifolia (Phaeophyceae). Clim. Chang. 2017, 142, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Celis-Plá, P.S.M.; Hall-Spencer, J.M.; Horta, P.A.; Milazzo, M.; Korbee, N.; Cornwall, C.E.; Figueroa, F.L. Macroalgal responses to ocean acidification depend on nutrient and light levels. Front. Mar. Sci. 2015, 2, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Witman, J.D.; Dayton, P.K. Rocky subtidal communities. In Marine Community Ecology; Bertness, M.D., Gaines, S.D., Hay, M.E., Eds.; Sinauer Press: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2001; pp. 339–366. [Google Scholar]
  99. Silchenko, A.S.; Imbs, T.I.; Zvyagintseva, T.N.; Fedoreyev, S.; Ermakova, S. Brown alga metabolites–inhibitors of marine organism fucoidan hydrolases. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2017, 53, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Van Alstyne, K.L. Herbivore grazing increases polyphenolic defenses in the intertidal brown alga Fucus distichus. Ecology 1988, 69, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Swanson, A.K.; Druehl, L.D. Induction, exudation and the UV protective role of kelp phlorotannins. Aquat. Bot. 2002, 73, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shibata, T.; Hama, Y.; Miyasaki, T.; Ito, M.; Nakamura, T. Extracellular secretion of phenolic substances from living brown algae. J. Appl. Phycol. 2006, 18, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Littler, M.M.; Littler, D.S. The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgae: Field and laboratory tests of a functional form model. Am. Nat. 1980, 116, 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Steneck, R.S.; Dethier, M.N. A functional group approach to the structure of algal-dominated communities. Oikos 1994, 69, 476–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Pavia, H.; Brock, E. Extrinsic factors influencing phlorotannin production in the brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 193, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Larkum, A.W.D.; Orth, R.J.; Duarte, C.M. (Eds.) Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 1–691. [Google Scholar]
  107. Orth, R.J.; Carruthers, T.J.B.; Dennison, W.C.; Duarte, C.M.; Fourqurean, J.W.; Heck, K.L.; Hughes, A.R.; Kendrick, G.A.; Kenworthy, W.J.; Olyarnik, S.; et al. A Global Crisis for Seagrass Ecosystems. BioScience 2006, 56, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Duarte, C.M.; Losada, I.J.; Hendriks, I.E.; Mazarra, I.; Marbà, N. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2013, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. den Hartog, C.; Kuo, J.J. Taxonomy and Biogeography in Seagrasses. In Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation; Larkum, A.W.D., Orth, R.J., Duarte, C.M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  110. Bremer, B.; Bremer, K.; Chase, M.W.; Fay, M.F.; Reveal, J.L.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S.; Stevens, P.F.; Anderberg, A.A.; Moore, M.J.; et al. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 161, 105–121. [Google Scholar]
  111. Boudouresque, C.F.; Bernard, G.; Bonhomme, P.; Charbonnel, E.; Diviacco, G.; Meinesz, A.; Pergent, G.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Ruitton, S.; Tunesi, L. Protection and Conservation of Posidonia Oceanica Meadows; RAMOGE and RAC/SPA Publish: Tunis, Tunisia, 2012; pp. 1–202. [Google Scholar]
  112. Procaccini, G.; Buia, M.C.; Gambi, M.C.; Perez, M.; Pergent, G.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Romer, J. The Seagrasses of Western Mediterranean. In World Atlas of Seagrasses; Green, E.P., Short, F.T., Eds.; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003; pp. 48–58. [Google Scholar]
  113. Gnisci, V.; Cognetti De Martiis, S.; Belmonte, A.; Micheli, C.; Piermattei, V.; Bonamano, S.; Marcelli, M. Assessment of the ecological structure of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile on the northern coast of Lazio, Italy (central Tyrrhenian, Mediterranean). Ital. Bot. 2020, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Boudouresque, C.F. Marine biodiversity in the Mediterranean: Status of species, populations and communities. Trav. Sci. Parc Natl. Port-Cros 2004, 20, 97–146. [Google Scholar]
  115. Pergent-Martini, C.; Leoni, V.; Pasqualini, V.; Ardizzone, G.D.; Balestri, E.; Bedini, R.; Belluscio, A.; Belsher, T.; Borg, J.; Boudouresque, C.F.; et al. Descriptors of Posidonia oceanica meadows: Use and application. Ecol. Indic. 2005, 5, 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Micheli, C.; Paganin, P.; Peirano, A.; Caye, C.; Meinesz, A.; Bianchi, C.N. Genetic variability of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile in relation to local factors and biogeographic patterns. Aquat. Bot. 2005, 82, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bonacorsi, M.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Breand, N.; Pergent, G. Is Posidonia oceanica regression a general feature in the Mediterranean Sea? Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2013, 14, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cariello, L.; Zanetti, L. Distribution of chicoric acid during leaf development of Posidonia oceanica. Bot. Mar. 1979, 22, 359–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lattanzio, V.; Kroon, P.A.; Quideau, S.; Treutter, D. Plant phenolics-Secondary metabolites with diverse functions. In Recent Advances in Polyphenol Research; Daayf, F., Lattanzio, V., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2008; Volume 1, pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Boumaza, S.; Boudefoua, N.; Boumaza, R.; Semroud, R. Effects of urban effluents on spatial structure, morphology and total phenols of Posidonia oceanica: Comparison with a reference site. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2014, 457, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cheynier, V.; Comte, C.; Davies, K.M.; Lattanzio, V.; Martens, S. Plant phenolics: Recent ad advances on their biosynthesis, genetics, and ecophysiology. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 72, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Papadopoulou, A.; Frazier, A.R. Characterization of protein–polyphenol interactions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sęczyk, Ł.; Świeca, M.; Kapusta, I.; Gawlik-Dziki, U. Protein–Phenolic Interactions as a Factor Affecting the Physicochemical Properties of White Bean Proteins. Molecules 2019, 24, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Serve, L.; Piovetti, L.; Combout, G. Analyse des substances phenoliques des restes de Posidonia oceanica. (L.) Delile provenanton sediments holocenes et de deposits actuels. In GIS Posidonia International Workshop; Boudouresque, C.F., Jeudy de Grissac, A., Olivier, J., Eds.; Gis Posidonie Publish: Marseille, France, 1984; pp. 137–144. [Google Scholar]
  125. Cuny, P.; Serve, L.; Jupin, H.; Boudouresque, C.F. Water soluble phenolic compounds of the marine phanerogam Posidonia oceanica in a Mediterranean area colonised by the introduced chlorophyte Caulerpa taxifolia. Aquat. Bot. 1995, 52, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kaal, J.; Serrano, O.; Nierop, K.G.J.; Schellekens, J.; Martínez Cortizas, A.; Mateo, M.-Á. Molecular composition of plant parts and sediment organic matter in a Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) mat. Aquat. Bot. 2016, 133, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Cornara, L.; Pastorino, G.; Borghesi, B.; Salis, A.; Clericuzio, M.; Marchetti, C.; Damonte, G.; Burlando, B. Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile Ethanolic exstract modulates cell activities with skin health applications. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Bitam, F.; Ciavatta, M.L.; Manzo, E.; Villani, G.; Gavagnin, M. The first record of neolignans from the marine phanerogam Posidonia oceanica. Phytochem. Lett. 2012, 5, 696–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Papenbrock, J. Highlights in Seagrasses’ phylogeny, physiology and metabolism: What makes them Special? ISRN Bot. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Klap, V.A.; Hemminga, M.A.; Boon, J.J. Retention of lignin in seagrasses: Angiosperms that returned to the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 194, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Ferrat, L.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Romeo, M.; Pergent, G. Hydrosoluble phenolic compounds production in a Mediterranean seagrass according to mercury contamination. Gul. Mex. Sci. 2003, 21, 108. [Google Scholar]
  132. Rotini, A.; Micheli, C.; Valiante, L.M.; Migliore, L. Assessment of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile conservation status by standard and putative approaches: The case study of Santa Marinella meadow (Italy, W Mediterranean). Open J. Ecol. 2011, 1, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Ferrat, L.; Wyllie-Echeverria, S.; Cates Rex, G.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Pergent, G.; Zou, J.; Romero, M.; Pasqualini, V.; Fernandez, C. Posidonia oceanica and Zostera marina as Potential Biomarkers of Heavy Metal Contamination in Coastal Systems. In Ecological Water Quality-Water Treatment and Reuse; Voudouris, K., Ed.; In Tech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Cannac, M.; Ferrat, L.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Pergent, G.; Pasqualini, V. Effects of fish farming on flavonoids in Posidonia oceanica. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 370, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Leoni, V.; Pasqualini, V.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Vela, A.; Pergent, G. Morphological responses of Posidonia oceanica to experimental nutrient enrichment of the canopy water. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2006, 339, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Steele, L.T.; Valentine, J.F. Idiosyncratic response of seagrass phenolic production following sea urchin grazing. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012, 466, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Cozza, R.; Chiappetta, A.; Petrarulo, M.; Salimonti, A.; Rende, F.; Bitonti, M.B.; Innocenti, A.M. Cytophisiological features of Posidonia oceanica as putative markers of environmental conditions. Chem. Ecol. 2004, 20, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Micheli, C.; Paglialonga, A.; Soldati, P.; Cremisini, C.; Chiavarini, S. Photosynthetic performance and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) accumulation by the macroalgae Ulva laetevirens. Sci. Total Environ. 1995, 171, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Micheli, C.; Spinosa, F.; Aliani, S.; Gasparini, G.P.; Molcard, A.; Peirano, A. Genetic input by Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile fruits dispersed by currents in the Ligurian Sea. Plant Biosyst. 2010, 144, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Micheli, C.; D’Esposito, D.; Belmonte, A.; Peirano, A.; Valiante, L.M.; Procaccini, G. Genetic diversity and structure in two protected Posidonia oceanica meadows. Mar. Environ. Res. 2015, 109, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Leoni, V.; Pasqualini, V.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Vela, A.; Pergent, G. Physiological responses of Posidonia oceanica to experimental nutrient enrichment of the canopy water J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2007, 349, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Machaix, J.-J.; Fleuriet, A.; Jay-Allemand, C. Les Composés Phénoliques des Végétaux, un Exemple de Métabolites Secondaires D’importance Economique; Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes: Lausanne, France, 2005; pp. 1–216. [Google Scholar]
  143. Yates, J.C.; Peckol, P. Effects of nutrient availability and herbivory on polyphenolics in the seaweed Fucus vesiculosus. Ecology 1993, 74, 1757–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Strauss, S.Y.; Agrawal, A.A. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Coley, P.D.; Bryant, J.P.; Chapin, F.S. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 1985, 230, 895–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Goecker, M.E.; Heeck, K.L.; Valentine, J.F. Effect of nitrogen concentration in turtlegrass Thalassia testudium on consumption by the bucktooth parrofish Sparisoma radians. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2005, 286, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Tomas, F.; Abbott, J.M.; Steinberg, C.; Balk, M.; Williams, S.L.; Stachowicz, J.J. Plant genotype and nitrogen loading influence seagrass productivity, biochemistry, and plant–herbivore interactions. Ecology 2011, 92, 1807–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Zimmerman, R.C.; Kohrs, D.G.; Steller, D.L.; Alberte, R.S. Impact of CO2 enrichment on productivity and light requirements on eelgrass. Plant Physiol. 1997, 115, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Invers, O.; Tomàs, F.; Pérez, M.; Romero, J. Potential effect of increased global CO2 availability on the depth distribution of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile: A tentative assessment using a carbon balance model. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2002, 71, 1191–1198. [Google Scholar]
  150. Arnold, T.; Freundlich, G.; Weilnau, T.; Verdi, A.; Tibbets, I. Impacts of groundwater discharge at Myora Springs (North Stradbroke Island, Australia) on the phenolic metabolism of eelgrass, Zostera muelleri, and grazing by the juvenile rabbitfish, Siganus fuscescens. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Verges, A.; Becerro, M.A.; Alcoverro, T.; Romero, J. Experimental evidence of chemical deterrence against multiple herbivores in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2007, 343, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Hernán, G.; Ramajo, L.; Basso, L.; Delgado, A.; Terrados, J.; Duarte, C.M.; Tomas, F. Seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) seedlings in a high-CO2 world: From physiology to herbivory. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Endara, M.J.; Coley, P.D. The re source availability hypothesis revisited: A meta analisis. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 25, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Pergent-Martini, C.; Boudouresque, C.F.; Pasqualini, V.; Pergent, G. Impact of fish farming facilities on Posidonia oceanica meadows: A review. Mar. Ecol. 2006, 27, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Marbà, N.; Duarte, C.M. Mediterranean warming triggers seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) shoot mortality. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010, 16, 2366–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zenetos, A.; Gofas, S.; Morri, C.; Rosso, A.; Violanti, D.; García Raso, J.E.; Çinar, M.E.; AlmogiLabin, A.; Ates, A.S.; Azzurro, E.; et al. Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea by 2012. A contribution to the application of European Union’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Part 2. Patterns in introduction trends and pathways. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2012, 13, 328–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Katsanevakis, S.; Zenetos, A.; Belchior, C.; Cardoso, A.C. Invading European Seas: Assessing pathways of introduction of marine aliens. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 76, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Mannino, A.M. Human activities trigger change in marine landscape. Flora Mediterr. 2018, 28, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Pergent-Martini, C.; Pergent, G. Marine phanerogams as a tool in the evaluation of marine trace metal contamination: An example from the Mediterranean. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 13, 126–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Calvo, S.; Tomasello, A.; Di Maida, G.; Pirrotta, M.; Buia, M.C.; Cinelli, F.; Cormaci, M.; Furnari, G.; Giaccone, G.; Luzzu, F.; et al. Seagrasses along the Sicilian coasts. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 26, 249–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Domina, G.; Campisi, P.; Mannino, A.M.; Sparacio, I.; Raimondo, F.M. Environmental quality assessment of the Sicilian coast using a multi-disciplinary approach. Acta Zool. Bulg. 2018, (Suppl. 11), 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  162. Cozza, R.; Rende, F.; Ferrari, M.; Bruno, L.; Pacenza, M.; Dattola, L.; Bitonti, M.B. Biomonitoring of Posidonia oceanica beds by a multiscale approach. Aquat. Bot. 2019, 156, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Jahnke, M.; Olsen, J.L.; Procaccini, G. A meta-analysis reveals a positive correlation between genetic diversity metrics and environmental status in the long-lived seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 2336–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cystoseira sensu latu community (A), Posidonia oceanica meadow (B).
Figure 1. Cystoseira sensu latu community (A), Posidonia oceanica meadow (B).
Jmse 08 00019 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of phloroglucinol (A), eckol (left) and triphlorethohydroxycarmalol (right) (B), fucophloroethol (C), fucodiphloroethol (D), trifuhalol (E) (A, B, E modified from [4]; C, D modified from [71]).
Figure 2. Chemical structures of phloroglucinol (A), eckol (left) and triphlorethohydroxycarmalol (right) (B), fucophloroethol (C), fucodiphloroethol (D), trifuhalol (E) (A, B, E modified from [4]; C, D modified from [71]).
Jmse 08 00019 g002
Figure 3. Variations of total phenolic content (TPC) in four Mediterranean brown algae. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 5) (from [78]).
Figure 3. Variations of total phenolic content (TPC) in four Mediterranean brown algae. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 5) (from [78]).
Jmse 08 00019 g003
Figure 4. Carpodesmia amentacea: seasonal variations of the TPC and sea water temperature. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 5) (from [81]).
Figure 4. Carpodesmia amentacea: seasonal variations of the TPC and sea water temperature. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 5) (from [81]).
Jmse 08 00019 g004
Figure 5. Phenolic compounds in Posidonia oceanica.
Figure 5. Phenolic compounds in Posidonia oceanica.
Jmse 08 00019 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mannino, A.M.; Micheli, C. Ecological Function of Phenolic Compounds from Mediterranean Fucoid Algae and Seagrasses: An Overview on the Genus Cystoseira sensu lato and Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8010019

AMA Style

Mannino AM, Micheli C. Ecological Function of Phenolic Compounds from Mediterranean Fucoid Algae and Seagrasses: An Overview on the Genus Cystoseira sensu lato and Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2020; 8(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mannino, Anna Maria, and Carla Micheli. 2020. "Ecological Function of Phenolic Compounds from Mediterranean Fucoid Algae and Seagrasses: An Overview on the Genus Cystoseira sensu lato and Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8010019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop