Next Article in Journal
Market Needs, Opportunities and Barriers for the Floating Wind Industry
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Water Masses and Circulation on the Surface Water Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Summer in Eastern Beibu Gulf, China
Previous Article in Journal
Simulating Landfast Ice in Lake Superior
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leaching Remediation of Dredged Marine Sediments Contaminated with Heavy Metals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distribution and Bioaccumulation of Essential and Toxic Metals in Tissues of Thaila (Catla catla) from a Natural Lake, Pakistan and Its Possible Health Impact on Consumers

1
Department of Chemistry, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
2
Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA
3
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(7), 933; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070933
Submission received: 20 June 2022 / Revised: 3 July 2022 / Accepted: 4 July 2022 / Published: 7 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Pollution under Climate Change in Coastal Areas)

Abstract

:
Although fish are often recommended as a component of a healthy diet, the environmental accumulation of heavy metals in many fish species has been of considerable concern for those weighing the nutritional health benefits against adverse toxic outcome of excess intake of toxic metals. This study aimed to determine the concentration of essential and toxic metals in the tissues of Catla catla in Mangla Lake and to assess the possible risk to the consumers. Fifty samples of Catla catla were collected from Mangla Lake, Mirpur, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan and analyzed for eighteen metals including essential and trace metals. The measured range concentrations (µg/g, wet weight) in muscle tissues, in decreasing order, were: K (955–1632), Ca (550–2081), Na (449–896), Mg (129–312), Zn (61.2–215), Fe (11.6–26.8), Sr (2.60–9.27), Pb (1.72–7.81), Se (1.55–3.55), Co (0.12–4.08), Mn (1.04–4.33), Ni (0.69–3.06), Cu (0.88–2.78), Cr (0.45–1.88), As (0.67–1.58), Cd (0.28–0.56), Hg (0.17–0.57) and Li (0.12–0.38). The metal concentrations found in this study were comparatively higher than those reported in literature. A majority of the metals exhibited higher accumulation in gills compared with those in scales and muscles. Mean levels of Pb, As, Co, Mn, Cd, Cr and Zn in Catla catla muscle were found to be exceeding the international permissible limits for the safe human consumption. The condition factor (K), as an indicator of fish health status, indicated that Catla catla of Mangla Lake are in good health condition. The metal pollution index (MPI) of gills (27.9), scales (12.5) and muscle (7.57) indicated low contamination. Moreover, human health risk was evaluated using estimated weekly intake (EWI) and daily intake (EDI), target hazard quotient (THQ), hazard index (HI) and target cancer risk (TCR). Estimated weekly and daily intake values for As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni and Pb were higher than provisional permissible tolerable weekly intake and permissible tolerable daily intake while THQ for As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, Se and Zn was higher than 1. The THQ for As, Hg and Pb was several folds higher than 1, indicative of lifetime non-carcinogenic health risks to the consumers. The hazard index indicated cumulative risk, which greatly increased with increasing fish consumption. Target cancer risk indicated that the people eating the Catla catla from Mangla Lake were exposed to As, Cd, Cr, Ni and Pb with a significant lifetime carcinogenic risk. In summary, consumption of Catla catla from this lake was found to be associated with an increased lifetime risk to the general health of the consumers.

1. Introduction

Fish is an important component of the human diet and generally known as a vital component of a well-balanced diet [1,2,3,4,5]. Fish consumption worldwide has been increasing in the last few decades due to the nutritional and preventive benefits. In addition to being a good source of low-fat high-quality protein, fish also provides omega-3 fatty acids, vitamins such as A, D, and B, calcium and phosphorus and minerals, such as iron, zinc and potassium [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. It lowers the blood pressure, prevents cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, reduces Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, normalizes cholesterol levels, reduces LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, and increases HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol. The American Heart Association recommends eating fish at least two times per week as part of a healthy diet [5,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Regardless of their known health benefits, fish and other seafood may represent a risk to human health due to the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of contaminants through the food chain. Fish reside near the top of the aquatic food chain; therefore, they accumulate pollutants from the consumption of other aquatic organisms. Along with essential metals, toxic metals are also accumulated in fish tissues. Thus, the presence of toxic heavy metals in fish can lower their overall nutritional benefits [9,15,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
Toxic metal contamination of aquatic environments and aquatic diets is a serious environmental issue worldwide [5,27,28]. Industrialization, agricultural activity, rapid urbanization, atmospheric deposition, geological weathering, etc. have resulted in aquatic environmental pollution [29,30,31,32]. Heavy metals, originating from natural as well as anthropogenic sources, continually enter the aquatic environment and pose serious threats to human health due to the tendency of metals to bioaccumulate and to persist due to metals being unable to be metabolized or chemically consumed [30,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Some metals are essential (e.g., Cu, Fe, Zn), while others (e.g., Cd, Pb, Hg) are non-essential yet can compete with essential metals for transport and utilization and are highly toxic to organisms [39]. It is well recognized that essential elements, i.e., Fe, Cu, Ni, Na, K and Zn, are vital in the biological systems and have important functions but very high intakes can cause adverse health problems [40]. Furthermore, metals like Cd, Hg and Pb have no biological role and, hence, they are toxic even at low levels [10,25].
Metal pollution levels of the aquatic environment can be assessed by analyzing water, sediments, flora and fauna for metal content [30,41,42,43]. In many studies, fish are employed as bioindicators of aquatic contamination [15,44,45]. Fish are good bioindicators of the effects of metals because some metals disturb important metabolic processes involved in reproduction, immune system, ecological degradation and pathological changes in tissues [44], and consumption of such metal-contaminated fish can cause adverse health effects, particularly for sensitive populations such as pregnant women and young children [44,46,47]. These bioindicator species collect metal contaminants from their environment with the passage of time and pass accumulated contaminants through the food chain to top predatory fish and higher trophic–level organisms, including fish-eating sea birds, sea mammals and human consumers [46,48,49,50]. Many factors, including both intrinsic species differences (trophic status, feeding strategy, age, gender, body size and phase of sexual reproduction) and extrinsic environmental conditions (the chemical form of the metal, contamination severity, and occurrence of other contaminants, and associated water quality conditions, such as salinity, temperature, pH, etc.), affect the accumulation of metals in fish [51,52,53,54,55]. Therefore, tissue metal levels can be used to give an integrated view of environmentally available metals, potential effects on the fish itself and on the potential adverse health risk to the consumer [3,56,57].
Currently, human health risks through consumption of contaminated aquatic food are generally recognized as a major health issue, and this concern is increasing globally [5,58,59,60]. Furthermore, the intake of toxic metal-contaminated food can reduce vital nutrients in the body, causing detrimental health effects; therefore, the risk assessment of these metals is a very crucial matter [61,62,63]. The analysis of metal content in fish can be extended to the assessment of potential effects to human health through the use of risk analysis. This can gauge the extent of the hazards to human health and begin to estimate the scope of the environmental metal pollution problem [10,64]. This method is typically based on the target hazard quotient (THQ). In addition, biometric parameters such as condition factor (CF) are used as indicators of metabolic status in fish which is highly dependent on water quality [65]. CF also provides information on habitat quality and health condition of fish populations [66,67]. Thus, this study was planned to gauge the risk assessment associated with Catla catla consumption supplied to local markets in Pakistan from Mangla Lake. Catla catla is one of the well-known fish found in the Mangla Lake and one of the popular fish varieties found in the local market almost available throughout the year. Catla catla marketing depends on domestic markets. In local markets, it is sold fresh. Catla catla, a surface-feeder, usually feeds on phytoplankton, zooplankton, small insects, and crustacean. April to late July is its spawning period. The carp, including Catla catla, an important aquatic food, is known as a protein major source from Pakistani aquatic bodies. Due to their high commercial demand and higher economic importance, all these species are cultured in priority base [68]. According to Mirza et al. [69], the total commercial fish production from the Lake had an average total catch of 441.26 mt/year in 2010, which was 130 mt higher as compared with the catches during the previous year, and their demand was increasing annually.
The main objectives of the present work were: (i) to evaluate metal levels: arsenic (As), calcium (Ca), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), mercury (Hg), potassium (K), lithium (Li), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), sodium (Na), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), selenium (Se), strontium (Sr) and zinc (Zn) in muscle, gills and scales of Catla catla from Mangla Lake, Mirpur Azad Kashmir, Pakistan, (ii) to compare metal accumulation in muscle, gills and scales of Catla catla, (iii) to compare metal data against international standards as well as worldwide reported levels in various reservoirs, (iv) to evaluate the possible sources of metals by principal component analysis and cluster analysis, (v) to assess the estimated daily/weekly intake (EDI/EWI), target hazard quotient (THQ), hazard index (HI) and target cancer risk (TCR) in Catla catla for the purpose of gauging the potential health risk to consumers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Mangla Lake, one of the important freshwater resources in Pakistan (Figure 1), was built on the Jhelum River near Mirpur, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Four rivers (two perennial and two non-perennial) were the feeding source to the Mangla Lake. This Lake has many positive impacts including agriculture growth, hydropower, water supply and fish farming. Fish species (Cyprinus carpio, Catla catla, Wallago attu etc.) having high market value are cultured on commercial basis. The Mangla Lake major contributions to population are that water is used for irrigation, hydroelectric production, domestic/drinking purpose and recreational activities. The untreated urban runoffs, poultry waste, industrial waste and agricultural runoffs around the Lake are the major pollution sources [70,71].

2.2. Sampling

Fifty samples of Catla catla were collected by a standard procedure with the help of fishermen from Mangla Lake, using protocols designed by the USEPA 2003 [72]. Fish samples collected during sampling were stored immediately in an ice box for transportation to the chemical laboratory. Total length (mm) and body weight (g) were measured prior to dissection of muscle, gills and scales. Fish samples were washed with deionized water, bisected into muscle, scales and gills, put in clean dry polyethylene bags and stored at −20 °C until further metal analysis [3,32,73].

2.3. Sample Preparation and Analysis

Fish samples were defrosted, weighed (wet weight) and dried at 102 °C for 12 h, then weighed again (dry weight) after cooling to room temperature. The dried fish tissues (1.000 ± 0.001 g) were digested with 5 mL concentrated nitric acid, 1 mL HCl and 8 mL deionized water in an appropriate digestion vessel using a closed-vessel microwave digestion system. The digestion vessel was wrapped and placed in the microwave oven system according to the manufacturer’s instructions ensuring all safety considerations. The vessel was heated for at 300 W for 5 min; followed by 5 min at 600 W, 5 min at 900 W and 10–15 min at 1200 W, respectively, until a light yellow and clear solution was obtained and the vessel was allowed to cool for 5 min each time before further processing. The cooled digested solution was filtered through filter paper, and the final volume was adjusted to 50 mL [73,74,75,76,77]. A reagent blank without a sample was also prepared using the same procedure.
Samples were analyzed using flame atomic absorption spectroscopy for the metals Ca, Co, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mn, Mg, Na, Sr and Zn (Shimadzu AA 670, Kyoto, Japan) and by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the metals As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb and Se, using an Agilent ICP-MS (7500ce, USA), operated in the helium collision mode for Cr, Ni, As and Se (to eliminate interference from polyatomic species) and in standard mode for Cd, Hg and Pb. The RF power was 1500 W, and the isotopes measured were 75As, 114Cd, 52Cr, 201Hg, 60Ni, 208Pb and 82Se. All the measurements were recorded in triplicate. Quantification of the metals in fish samples was done by the calibration line method maintaining optimum analytical conditions [78]. Instrument settings were as recommended in the manufacturer’s manual.
Quality control and quality assurance of fish tissue digestion and analysis were monitored using blanks and certified standard reference material (SRM 1946; Lake Superior Fish Tissue). Three standard reference samples were analyzed with every 20 samples for quality assurance, and three blanks were analyzed with each round of digestion to monitor contamination during extraction and in reagents and digestion vessels. Recoveries of the selected metals ranged from 92% to 105% of the certified value. All the chemicals used throughout the study were of analytical reagent grade. Deionized water was used to prepare all the reagents and standards. All glassware was soaked over-night in 10% (v/v) nitric acid, rinsed with distilled and deionized water and oven dried before use during this study [3,32,79].

2.4. Calculation of Accumulation Levels

The metal pollution index (MPI) was calculated to estimate total accumulation of the metals in the various tissues. The metal pollution index (MPI) was calculated by the following equation [80,81,82]:
M P I = M 1 × M 2 × M 3 × . M n 1 / n
where Mn is the concentration of an element n in the sample (µg/g). MPI describes the overall quality of environmental components with respect to metals, and has shown to be suitable tool in assessing pollution level.

2.5. Health Risk Assessment

2.5.1. Coefficient of Condition

The coefficient of condition (K) in fish samples was calculated for each sample by using the formula equation [83,84,85]
K = 100 × W / L 3
where W is weight in grams, and L is body length in centimeters.

2.5.2. Assessment of Daily and Weekly Intakes

The potential health risk of the studied metals to consumers was measured using calculation of weekly and daily intake according to the following equation [82,86]:
E D I = C × I R / B W
E W I = E D I × 7
where C is the mean metal concentrations in muscle tissue (µg/g, wet weight), IR is the ingestion rate (250 g/day/person), and BW is the human body weight (70 kg) [5,82,86,87].

2.5.3. Assessment of Target Hazard Quotient (THQ), Hazard Index (HI) and Target Cancer Risk (TCR)

Target hazard quotient (THQ) is an assessment method to assess the possible non-carcinogenic risks to humans from pollutant intake [87,88]. The method to estimate THQ was provided in the USEPA Region III Risk-Based Concentration Table [89]
T H Q = C f i s h × I R × 10 3 × E F r × E D t o t / R f D × B W a × A T n
where Cfish is the mean metal level in fish (μg/g, wet weight); IR is the fish ingestion rate (0.250 kg/day) [87]; EFr is the exposure frequency (365 days/year); EDtot is the total exposure duration (70 years); RfD is the reference dose for the specific constituent (μg/g/day); BWa is the body weight, adult (70 kg); and ATn is the averaging time, non-carcinogens (EDtot × 365 day/year) [82,90,91].
The hazard index (HI) can be expressed as the sum of the hazard quotients for all selected metals [89]
H I = T H Q 1 + T H Q 2 + + T H Q n  
where THQ is the target hazard quotients for n selected metals.
Target cancer risk (TCR) is used to assess the carcinogenic risks to the inhabitants from fish consumption [88]. The method to estimate TCR was also provided in the USEPA Region III Risk-Based Concentration Table [89]:
T C R = C b × I R F × 10 3 × C P S o × E F r × E D t o t / B W a × A T c
where CPSo is the carcinogenic potency slope, oral (μg/g/day) − 1; ATc is the averaging time, carcinogens (70 × 365 days). Since CPSo values were not available for all the selected metals, the TCR of As, Cd, Cr, Ni and Pb were thus calculated only to indicate the lifetime carcinogenic risk to the populations [92].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis can be used to measure the complex ecotoxicological processes by indicating the relationship and interdependency among the variables and their relative weights [93]. Standard statistical analyses (minimum, maximum, mean, median, standard deviation) were used to analyze the heavy metal data in fish. The most common multivariate statistical methods, principal component analysis (PCA), and cluster analysis (CA) were used to determine the relationship among metals in aquatic environments and their possible sources. A p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical software package (STATISTICA-Version 5.5, Tulsa, OK, USA) was used for multivariate statistical analyses of the fish metal data [94]. Ward’s method was used in cluster analysis, and results were shown in dendrogram while Varimax rotation methods were performed in principal components analyses. PCA was performed using principal component extraction with eigenvalue > 1 [95].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Biometric Data for Catla catla

The biometric data (length—L, weight—W, coefficient of condition—K) for Catla catla were measured. Ranges and mean levels (in bracket) of L, W and K were 29.7–46.0 cm (36.3 cm), 473–988 g (629 g) and 1.00–1.80 (1.33), respectively (Table 1). The coefficient of condition (K) has noteworthy roles in fishery management and reflects physical and biological condition, and energy level of the fish. This parameter can be influenced by variations feeding conditions, parasitic infections and physiological factors, and is used to assess the overall fish healthiness or robustness. The higher the K values, the healthier the fish [83,84,85,87]. Therefore, our data indicate that Catla catla was in relatively good health within in the waters of the Lake.

3.2. Metal Concentrations in Tissues of Catla catla

Determination of metal levels in fish tissue is very important for management authorities and is a major concern for human health. In the current study, statistical data for the tissue contents of the 18 metals (µg/g) in the muscle of Catla catla are shown in Table 2. These data are compared with reported levels in literature (Table 3). On average, the measured levels of As, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Se, Sr and Zn in muscle tissue were found to be 1.04, 944, 0.40, 2.08, 1.05, 1.57, 18.1, 0.33, 1254, 0.24, 187, 2.07, 639, 1.86, 4.09, 2.59, 5.10, 110 µg/g, respectively. Among the eighteen metals, the four electrolyte metals K, Ca, Na, and Mg form the group with highest contents. Of the remaining metals, Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Se, Co, Ni, Cr are essential but can become toxic at higher levels, and Pb, Cd, Hg, As are toxic even at low levels associated with environmental contamination [96,97].
Ca, K, Mg and Na are the major, most dominant and vital elements and found in all animal tissues. Ca and Mg are important in bones and for teeth formation while Na and K play important role in nerve impulses transmission and electrolyte balancing [97,98]. The average levels of Ca, K, Mg and Na in Catla catla were 944, 1254, 187and 639 µg/g, respectively. Their elements levels were higher than concentrations reported by Kalyoncu et al. [99] and found lower compared to Mogobe et al. [98].
Selenium is a well-known antioxidant/anti-inflammatory agent and an important constituent of various selenoproteins that avoid damage from free radicals and reactive oxygen species [100,101]. Selenoprotiens are important in the cellular defense of carcinogenesis, cardiovascular disease and inflammation [102,103]. Selenium levels varied from 1.55 to 3.55 µg/g in muscles with an average level of 2.59 µg/g. Average levels of selenium were higher than levels reported by Alam et al., 2002 [104], Schenone et al., 2014 [105], and Qin et al., 2015 [76].
Fish is major source of iron for humans. It is an integral component of hemoglobin, myoglobin, ferritin, hemosiderin and many enzymes; it also plays a vital role in overall brain functioning [106,107]. Iron deficiency causes anemia, while excess intake may cause a variety of adverse health effects, such as cancer, diabetes, liver and heart diseases [108,109,110,111]. In the present study, Fe levels ranged from 11.6 to 26.8 µg/g. The mean level of Fe (18.1 µg/g) in muscle was higher than most of the reported values in literature [29,76,87,99,104,112,113]. The measured metal levels were also compared with the permissible levels (109 µg/g and 180 µg/g as per WHO and FAO guidelines, respectively [114,115], which revealed that the mean level of Fe in muscles was lower than the recommended limits and, thus, is of no risk for consumers.
Lithium can take part in some important biological processes in the human body such as, functioning of enzymes, hormones, vitamins and in female reproductive systems [116,117]. Its deficiency has been found to be associated with high rates of suicides, homicides and drug cases [118]. In this study, Li ranges from 0.12–0.38 µg/g, which is higher than values reported by Schenone et al., 2014 [105] and Qin et al., 2015 [76] but lower than that by Kalyoncu et al., 2012 [99].
Strontium is considered a non-essential element. However, excess consumption may result in adverse health effects such as bone growth problems in children, hard tissues, hypocalcaemia, anaemia and cancer [96,97,119,120]. In the current study, the range of Sr was observed to be 2.60–9.27 (µg/g) with an average of 5.10 (µg/g). Average levels of Sr were noted to be lower than those reported by Kalyoncu et al., 2012 [99] and Schenone et al., 2014 [105].
Manganese is an essential metal and required in a trace amount for the processing of carbohydrate, protein and cholesterol for animals and plants. It is associated with bone formation and also present in many enzymes. Its deficiency causes severe skeletal and reproductive abnormalities [87,121,122]. The mean manganese level in fish muscles was found to be 2.07 µg/g, which was higher than those reported by Iqbal and Shah, 2014 [87], Schenone et al., 2014 [105], Qin et al., 2015 [76], Hao et al., 2013 [112], Alam et al., 2002 [104], Mogobe et al., 2015 [98], whereas the Mn level in all samples (100%) was higher than the international permissible limits [114,123].
Copper is an essential nutrient for human health. Cu is an essential part of several enzymes and required for hemoglobin synthesis and strengthening bones; nevertheless, high intake causes liver and kidney damage [40,97,121,122,124,125]. In the present study, Cu was found in all the tested fish samples and the concentrations ranged from 0.88 to 2.78 µg/g with an average of 1.57 µg/g. Similarly, the average level of Cu in fish muscle was higher than those reported in literature [29,76,87,98,104,105,113,126]. The mean level of Cu was observed to be lower than the international permissible limits [114,115,123,127], indicating no risk to consumers.
Zinc, an essential metal for human health, is an important component of cells, enzymes, and cofactors. It is one of the most important trace and microelements for the human body and involved in many biological functions. It has a protective effect against cadmium and lead toxicities [40,97,125,128]. The concentration of Zn in fish muscle in this study (61.2–215 µg/g: 110 µg/g) is higher in those reported elsewhere (0.92–30.6 µg/g) (Table 3). The average Cu concentration (110 µg/g) in tissue was higher than tolerable and permissible levels of zinc in the muscle of fish given by FAO, 2000 [115] and MAFF, 2000 [123] but lower than the limit set by USEPA, 1983 [127].
Cobalt, an essential part of vitamin B12, has also been involved in the production of red blood cells and is necessary for proper thyroid function [87,97]; however, high levels of cobalt may cause lung damage, hair loss, bleeding and even death [122]. The measured levels of Co in fish muscle varied from 0.12 to 4.08 µg/g. Average Co concentration (2.08 µg/g) is lower than levels reported by Kalyoncu et al., 2012 [99] and Iqbal and Shah, 2014 [87] but higher than those by Alam et al., 2002 [104], Monroy et al., 2014 [29], Schenone et al., 2014 [105], Qin et al., 2015 [76], Kumar et al., 2020 [113] and Storelli et al., 2020 [126]. The measured levels of Co were also higher than the international permissible limits [114,123].
Chromium, which is commonly measured as a pollutant, is considered as a vital element for carbohydrate and fat metabolism in humans and its hexavalent form causes carcinogenicity, respiratory and reproductive disorders [63,129,130,131]. The measured levels of Cr in fish muscle varied from 0.45 to 1.88 µg/g with an average concentration of 1.04 µg/g. Chromium was detected in almost all the muscle samples, with the highest concentration being 1.88 µg/g, which is within the limits of 8 µg/g by USPEA [127] but higher than 0.15 µg/g by WHO [114]. The average level of Cr in fish muscles in this study is higher than reported values by Hao et al., 2013 [112], Qin et al., 2015 [76], Alam et al., 2002 [104], Kumar et al., 2020 [113] and Storelli et al., 2020 [126] but lower than that from Karacaoren Dam (Turkey) by Kalyoncu et al., 2012 [59] and Rawal Lake (Pakistan) by Iqbal and Shah, 2014 [87].
Nickel is a ubiquitous element in nature and essential for normal growth of many species of microorganisms and plants and several species of vertebrates [132]. It is required in low concentrations in the living organisms but elevated levels may result in carcinogenic effects [133]. Nickel concentrations in this study ranged from 0.69–3.06 µg/g in fish muscle. However, the mean Ni level (1.86 µg/g) was well within limits set by WHO, 2000 [114] and FAO, 2000 [115] but higher than those all worldwide reported values (Table 2) in fish muscle. The high level of Ni in the Catla catla of Mangla Lake indicates a potential negative impact for fish consumption.
Mercury is a non-essential, carcinogenic metal that is capable of accumulating in higher organisms, due to a strong tendency of biomagnification. Mercury is also well known to be a neurotoxin when in the methylated form, and can cause other adverse health problems [44,131,134,135]. The minimum and maximum mercury levels in Catla catla muscles were noted as 0.17 and 0.57 µg/g, respectively. The European Commission Regulation (2006) [136] as well as WHO (2000) [114] and FAO (2000) [115] set the limit of mercury levels to be 0.50 µg/g which was higher than our mean level found in Catla catla. Similarly, the average mercury level (0.33 µg/g) in fish muscle is lower than those reported by Monroy et al., 2014 [29] while higher than those by Qin et al., 2015 [76], Hao et al., 2013 [112] and Storelli et al., 2020 [126].
Cadmium is a toxic metal of high concern, has no essential biological activity in humans, and its exposure is mostly through the consumption of contaminated food and not from drinking water. Cadmium ions are well known to be complexed by metallothionein proteins, thereby limiting the toxicity [125,137]. In our study, the Cd levels in muscle varied from 0.28 to 0.56 µg/g with an average value 0.40 µg/g. Maximum permissible level for fish is 0.5 µg/g set by WHO (2000) [114] and FAO (2000) [115]. This indicated that Cd levels in the fish from Mangla Lake were below the limits set WHO (2000) [114] and FAO (2000) [115], while were above the limits set by 0.2 µg/g (MAFF, 2000) [123] and 0.1 µg/g (EC regulation, 2000) [136]. Similarly, the average value of Cd was well above the reported values by Alam et al., 2002 [104], Hao et al., 2013 [112], Monroy et al., 2014 [29], Schenone et al., 2014 [105], Qin et al., 2015 [76] and Storelli et al., 2020 [126], while lower than reported values by Kalyoncu et al., 2012 [99], Iqbal and Shah, 2014 [87] and Kumar et al., 2020 [113].
Lead is a persistent, non-essential metal with no known biological function in humans. Lead has been associated with various cancers, liver and kidney damage, and can lead to impaired neurological development in children [138,139,140]. In the present study, Pb was found in all the analyzed fish samples and the concentrations ranged from 1.72 to 7.81 µg/g with an average value 4.09 µg/g. Similarly, the average level of Pb in fish muscle from Mangla Lake is higher than those reported in literature: 2.41 µg/g [99], 1.3 µg/g [105], 0.181 µg/g [76], 0.02 µg/g [29], 0.047 µg/g [112], 0.031 µg/g [104], 0.22 µg/g [113] and 0.06 µg/g [126]. The mean level of Pb was observed to be higher than the international permissible limits [114,115,123,127,136], indicating a potential risk to people eating Catla catla.
Arsenic is a well-known carcinogen, affects the central and peripheral nervous systems, disrupts the heart rhythm, and can cause melanosis and hyperkeratosis [131]. The highest concentration of arsenic was found in fish muscle, with a maximum value of 1.58 µg/g. Compared with published data, the average value of As was well above the reported values by Schenone et al., 2014 [105], Qin et al., 2015 [76], Hao et al., 2013 [112] and Alam et al., 2002 [104]. The average arsenic concentration (1.04 µg/g) is higher than maximum permissible level for fish (1 µg/g) set by WHO (2000) [114] and FAO (2000) [115], suggesting an increased risk to the fish consumers.
Descriptive statistics for selected metal levels (µg/g) in the gills and scales of Catla catla are also shown in Table 2. The mean level in gills for Ca is highest (6520 µg/g), followed by Zn (1785 µg/g), Na (1698 µg/g), Mg (976 µg/g), K (896 µg/g) and Fe (94.3 µg/g), whereas Se (3.64 µg/g), Li (1.62 µg/g), As (0.93 µg/g), Cd (0.83 µg/g), and Hg (0.81 µg/g) exhibited relatively lower concentrations. Overall, the metal contents showed the following decreasing order based on average levels in the gills samples: Ca > Zn > Na > Mg > K > Fe > Sr > Mn > Pb > Co > Ni > Cr > Cu > Se > Li > As > Cd > Hg. Average concentrations of As, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Se, Sr and Zn in the scales were measured at 0.21, 4781, 0.82, 4.94, 3.17, 2.57, 31.5, 0.12, 281, 1.01, 463, 12.8, 719, 2.60, 6.74, 2.23, 29.0 and 355 µg/g, respectively. Among the selected metals, Ca, Na, Mg, Zn and K were the dominant contributors, while Li, Cd, As and Hg were the minor components in the scales of Catla catla. Ranking in decreasing order, the mean metal contents of scales were: Ca > Na > Mg > Zn > K > Fe > Sr > Mn > Pb > Co > Cr > Ni > Cu > Se > Li > Cd > As > Hg. To compare the total metal accumulation in the different tissue, the metal pollution index (MPI) was calculated (Table 2). Gills showed a higher MPI mean value (27.9), followed by scales (12.5) and muscle (7.57). This result clearly indicates that each tissue has a different capacity of accumulation, and higher metal accumulation was observed in gills as compared with scales and muscle. According to Jamil et al. (2014) [141], when MPI in the tissues ranged from 5 to 10, the contamination is low, while the MPI index values that varied between 2 and 5 suggests a very low contamination, and MPI < 2 means that not contaminated [142]. MPI value in this study was higher than 5, indicating low contamination in tissue following decreasing trends: Gills > Scales > Muscle.

3.3. Comparison of Metal Levels in Fish Tissues

Catla catla is a surface feeder and they are also omnivorous in nature. Metal levels assessment in fish tissue reflects the exposure of fish to these metals in the aquatic environment. Fish accumulate metals through respiration, adsorption, and ingestion. Different tissues have different accumulating capacities of metals, which may be due to differences in metabolic activity, changes in environmental pollution and functions of organs [143,144]. Furthermore, metal levels in different fish species might be due to different ecological requirements, metabolisms, age, size, and length of the fish, their habitats and feeding patterns [9,145].
Metal level comparisons in muscle, gills and scales of Catla catla are shown in Figure 2. An examination of the data document that the mean levels of Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Sr and Zn were comparatively higher in the gills, showing the following decreasing order among the three tissues: gills > scales > muscles. However, average concentrations of As and K were highest in muscle tissue, followed by gills with the lowest metal content in scales. In addition, Hg and Se exhibited the highest concentrations in the gills but lowest in the scales, giving the overall order of: gills > muscles > scales. In general, the gills showed elevated metal levels over the other tissues. The gills are considered a greater metal accumulator than muscles due to metal complexation with mucus [146]. Another factor is that the gills are the interface of metal ion exchange from the surrounding water and the fish circulatory system, and the tremendous surface area of this organ maximizes metal transport and thus metal accumulation. Therefore, the metal contents accrued in the gills were mainly concentrated from water [9,147,148].

3.4. Multivariate Analyses of Selected Metals in the Fish Species

Trace metals in sediments and fish may threaten the existence and survival of aquatic biota and human health; therefore, it is considered imperative to investigate and regulate the pollution sources. One of the most important aspects of the present study was source apportionment of metal pollutants in the aquatic system. For this purpose, principle component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) were employed to assess the possible pollution sources in Catla catla. The PC loadings of selected metals in the fish samples are shown in Table 4, where five PCs were extracted with eigenvalues greater than one, together explaining more than 82% of cumulative variance of the data. The dendrogram of CA related to the metal levels in fish samples is shown in Figure 3, which exhibited four significant clusters of the studied metals. In the case of PCA, the first PC (PC1) showed the highest loadings for Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Na and Zn; PC2 exhibited highest loadings for Ca, Mn and Sr; PC3 revealed highest loadings for Co, Cr and Se; PC4 demonstrated highest loadings for Cd, Li and Ni, while last PC exhibited highest loadings for As, Hg and Pb.
Similarly, in CA, the first cluster was composed of Hg–Pb–As–Cd–Ni–Li which showed that these metals were mostly contributed by the anthropogenic activities. Cd and Pb could be initiated from agricultural activities, fertilizers, pesticides and industrial emissions. In the past, Pb had been ascribed to the excessive use of gasoline as an additive [149]. The sources for As and Hg could be agriculture and industrial runoffs [150]. Moreover, Cd, Co and Pb might be linked with untreated sewage sludge, domestic/ agricultural wastes and boating activities [151,152,153]. Likewise, the second cluster consisted of Cu–Mg–Fe–K–Na–Zn and the third cluster was comprised of Ca–Sr–Mn. The metals in these two clusters were mainly contributed by natural inputs/lithogenic sources. The last cluster contained Cr–Se–Co, which were mostly contributed by mixed sources (anthropogenic as well as lithogenic contributions). Co, Cr and Ni may be from anthropogenic inputs such as fertilizers, limestone, excavation activities and manure [71,154,155]. Overall, CA results were in very good agreement with PCA findings and both multivariate methods revealed significant contamination inputs in the water Lake.

3.5. Potential Health Risk Assessment

A fish diet has many health benefits, but consumption of fish contaminated with toxic substances may actually threaten the health of the consumers [3,90]. Risk assessment measures the impacts of toxic substances exposure on human health, and has been defined by the USEPA among other government entities. Risk assessment for heavy metals is estimated by estimated daily intake (EDI), target hazard quotient (THQ), hazard index (HI) and target cancer risk (TR). These parameters, which were presented by US-EPA for the potential health risk estimation, depend on various factors (amount of contaminant intake, exposure frequency and duration, average body weight and oral reference dose (RfD) [156]. Human health risk assessments associated with the consumption of Catla catla were also evaluated and are shown in Table 5.
Average values of EWI and EDI for As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni and Pb were noted to be higher than the recommended provisional permissible tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) in mg/week/kg body weight; permissible tolerable daily intake (PTDI) values, while the remaining metals were within the recommended limits. According to the New York State Department of Health, 2007, if the EDI/ RfD ratio of heavy metal was equal to or less than the RfD, then the risk will be minimum. However, if it is >1–5 times the RfD, then risk will be low, if >5–10 times the RfD, then risk will be moderate; however, if it is >10 times the RfD, then the risk will be high. The EDI/ RfD ratio obtained for Cd, Cr and Zn was approximately 1.5-fold higher, two-fold for Se, four-fold for Pb and Hg and twelve times higher for As than their RfD values, indicating potential health hazard to the consumers, particularly for As; Hg and Pb registered moderate risk and Cd, Cr, Se and Zn manifested low risk, while EDI/ RfD ratios for the remaining metals were below one, thereby showing no risk.
Non-carcinogenic human health risks were also assessed for the consumer of Catla catla from Mangla Lake by using the THQ approach. THQ values higher than 1 would indicate a potential non-carcinogenic health risk to consumer health via contaminated fish consumption [90,157]. The measured THQ values for As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, Se and Zn were higher than unity, indicating that the consumption of contaminated Catla catla may cause non-carcinogenic risks. The HI value was observed to be 31.07, thus exhibiting lifetime non-carcinogenic health risks to the consumers.
The carcinogenic risk for As, Cd, Cr, Ni and Pb related with fish consumption was also evaluated. Significantly higher values of target cancer risk (TCR) were obtained for As (5.56E-03), Cd (8.63E-04), Cr (1.86E-03), Ni (1.13E-02) and Pb (1.24E-04), which is considerably higher than the acceptable risk limit (1 × 10−6) [89], indicating that the consumption of Catla catla from Mangla Lake on a continuous basis is associated with lifetime carcinogenic risk.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, the concentrations of eighteen elements in Catla catla in Mangla Lake, consumed by the local and Punjab province population and their potential health risk were examined. On average, the measured levels of As, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Se, Sr and Zn in the muscles were found to be 1.04, 944, 0.40, 2.08, 1.05, 1.57, 18.1, 0.33, 1254, 0.24, 187, 2.07, 639, 1.86, 4.09, 2.59, 5.10 and 110 µg/g, respectively. The mean levels of most elements are higher in the gills than scales and muscles. The metal levels in muscles in this study were mostly higher than those reported in literature. The average concentration of As (in all samples), Mn (in all samples), Zn (in all samples) and Co (in 90% of the samples) was found to be higher than tolerable and permissible levels given by FAO, 2000 and WHO, 2000. Chromium levels were also above the limits set by WHO, 2000. Cd levels were above the limits (0.2 µg/g) set by MAFF (MAFF, 2000) and 0.1 µg/g EC (EC regulation, 2006). Mean levels of Pb were observed to be higher than the international permissible limits (USEPA, 1983; FAO, 2000; MAFF, 2000; WHO, 2000; EC regulation, 2006), indicating that fish is contaminated by these metals. Metal pollution index (MPI) in gills, scales and muscles revealed 27.9, 12.5 and 7.57, indicating low contamination in fish tissue. The PCA and CA indicated that As, Cd, Co, Cr, Hg, Li, Ni, Pb and Se in fish from Mangla Lake, Pakistan were likely to be from anthropogenic contamination. Average estimated weekly and daily intake for As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni and Pb were found to be higher than the recommended PTWI and PTDI values, while the remaining metals were within the recommended limits. EDI/ RfD ratios for As, Hg, Pb, Se, Cd, Cr and Zn indicated As as high risk, Hg and Pb as moderate risk and Cd, Cr, Se and Zn as low risk to consumers. THQ for As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, Se and Zn was higher than 1, considered as the unsafe consumption level, indicating lifetime non-carcinogenic health risks to the inhabitants. Estimates of target cancer risk (TCR) suggest that people eating Catla catla from Mangla Lake were exposed to As, Cd, Cr, Ni and Pb contamination with a lifetime carcinogenic risk. Therefore, consumption of Catla catla in this study area was found to be unsafe from the health risk of non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic effects over a lifetime. We therefore recommend that further research in this area should be carried out to better understand the toxic metal effects on biotic factors of fish and to confirm the quality of foods for human health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and Methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, M.S. Conceptualization and methodology, supervision, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing, M.H.S.; data analysis, writing—review and editing, J.I.; ICP-MS analysis, writing—review and editing, Z.S.; writing—review and editing S.H.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research funding was awarded by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) (117-9772-PSF-002) and Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan, to carry out this project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the administration of Mangla Lake, Mirpur, Pakistan, for their cooperation during sample collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Storelli, M.M. Potential human health risks from metals (Hg, Cd, and Pb) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) via seafood consumption: Estimation of target hazard quotients (THQs) and toxic equivalents (TEQs). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2782–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pieniak, Z.; Verbeke, W.; Scholderer, J. Health-related beliefs and consumer knowledge as determinants of fish consumption. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2010, 23, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Taweel, A.; Shuhaimi-Othman, M.; Ahmad, A.K. Assessment of heavy metals in tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) from the Langat River and Engineering Lake in Bangi, Malaysia, and evaluation of the health risk from tilapia consumption. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 93, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Galimberti, C.; Corti, I.; Cressoni, M.; Moretti, V.M.; Menotta, S.; Galli, U.; Cambiaghi, D. Evaluation of mercury, cadmium and lead levels in fish and fishery products imported by air in North Italy from extra-European Union Countries. Food Control 2016, 60, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmed, A.S.S.; Rahman, M.; Sultana, S.; Babu, S.M.O.F.; Sarker, M.S.I. Bioaccumulation and heavy metal concentration in tissues of some commercial fishes from the Meghna River Estuary in Bangladesh and human health implications. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 145, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ozden, O.; Ulusoy, Ş.; Erkan, N. Study on the behavior of the trace metal and macro minerals in Mytilus galloprovincialis as a bioindicator species: The case of Marmara Sea, Turkey. J. Verbrauch. Lebensm. 2010, 5, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Copat, C.; Bella, F.; Castaing, M.; Fallico, R.; Sciacca, S.; Ferrante, M. Heavy metals concentrations in fish from Sicily (Mediterranean Sea) and evaluation of possible health risks to consumers. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2012, 88, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Longo, G.; Trovato, M.; Mazzei, V.; Ferrante, M.; Conti, G.O. Ligia italica (Isopoda, Oniscidea) as bioindicator of mercury pollution of marine rocky coasts. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. El-Moselhy, K.M.; Othman, A.I.; El-Azem, H.A.; El-Metwally, M.E.A. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in some tissues of fish in the Red Sea, Egypt. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2014, 1, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zohra, B.S.; Habib, A. Assessment of heavy metal contamination levels and toxicity in sediments and fishes from the Mediterranean Sea (southern coast of Sfax, Tunisia). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 13954–13963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Miri, M.; Akbari, E.; Amrane, A.; Jafari, S.J.; Eslami, H.; Hoseinzadeh, E.; Taghavi, M. Health risk assessment of heavy metal intake due to fish consumption in the Sistan region, Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fakhri, Y.; Saha, N.; Miri, A.; Baghaei, M.; Roomiani, L.; Ghaderpoori, M.; Bay, A. Metal concentrations in fillet and gill of parrotfish (Scarus ghobban) from the Persian Gulf and implications for human health. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 118, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kris-Etherton, P.; Harris, W.; Appel, L. Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2002, 106, 2747–2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wall, R.; Ross, R.P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Stanton, C. Fatty acids from fish: The anti-inflammatory potential of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids. Nutr. Rev. 2010, 68, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Medeiros, R.J.; dos Santos, L.M.G.; Freire, A.S.; Santelli, R.E.; Braga, A.M.C.B.; Krauss, T.M.; Jaco, S.C. Determination of inorganic trace elements in edible marine fish from Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Food Control 2012, 23, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Adel, M.; Dadar, M.; Fakhri, Y.; Oliveri Conti, G.; Ferrante, M. Heavy metal concentration in muscle of pike (Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758) from Anzali international wetland, southwest of the Caspian Sea and their consumption risk assessment. Toxin Rev. 2016, 35, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arca, M.; Borghi, C.; Pontremoli, R.; De Ferrari, G.M.; Colivicchi, F.; Desideri, G.; Temporelli, P.L. Hypertriglyceridemia and omega-3 fatty acids: Their often overlooked role in cardiovascular disease prevention. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2018, 28, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hamazaki, K.; Touchida, A.; Takamori, A.; Tanaka, T.; Ito, M.; Inadera, H. Dietary intake of fish and ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and physician-diagnosed allergy in Japanese population: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Nutrition 2019, 61, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jagodic, M.; SnojTratnik, J.; Potocnik, D.; Mazej, D.; Ogrinc, N.; Horvat, M. Dietary habits of Slovenian inland and coastal primiparaous women and fatty acid composition of their human milk samples. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 141, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Molnar, J.; Pal, M. The Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Health Preservation. J. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 8, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ruhland, S.; Hauser, J.; Kaunziger, I.; Nakamura, Y.; Stollberg, E. Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on working memory in rats with increased sugar intake. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 69, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Amirah, M.N.; Afiza, A.S.; Faizal, W.I.W.; Nurliyana, M.H.; Laili, S. Human health risk assessment of metal contamination through consumption of fish. J. Environ. Pollut. Hum. Health 2013, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fu, J.; Hu, X.; Tao, X.; Yu, H.; Zhang, X. Risk and toxicity assessments of heavy metals in sediments and fishes from the Yangtze River and Taihu Lake, China. Chemosphere 2013, 93, 1887–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bastam, K.D.; Afkhami, M.; Mohammadizadeh, M.; Ehsanpour, M.; Chambari, S.; Aghaei, S.; Esmaeilzadeh, M.; Neyestani, M.R.; Lagzaee, F.; Baniamam, M. Bioaccumulation and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the sediments and mullet Liza klunzingeri in the northern part of the Persian Gulf. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 94, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.L.; Xu, X.R.; Ding, Z.H.; Peng, J.X.; Jin, M.H.; Wang, Y.S.; Hong, Y.G.; Yue, W.Z. Heavy metals in wild marine fish from South China Sea: Levels, tissue- and species-specific accumulation and potential risk to humans. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 1583–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Omar, W.A.; Saleh, Y.S.; Marie, M.A. Integrating multiple fish biomarkers and risk assessment as indicators of metal pollution along the Red Sea coast of Hodeida, Yemen Republic. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 110, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dadar, M.; Adel, M.; Nasrollahzadeh Saravi, H.; Fakhri, Y. Trace element concentration and its risk assessment in common kilka (Clupeonella cultriventris caspia Bordin, 1904) from southern basin of Caspian Sea. Toxin Rev. 2017, 36, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, X.; Fan, D.; Liu, M.; Tian, Y.; Pang, Y.; Liao, H. Source identification, geochemical normalization and influence factors of heavy metals in Yangtze River Estuary sediment. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 241, 938–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Monroy, M.; Maceda-Veiga, A.; De-Sostoa, A. Metal concentration in water, sediment and four species from Lake Titicaca reveals a large—Scale environmental concern. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 487, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jayaprakash, M.; Kumar, R.S.; Giridharan, L.; Sujitha, S.B.; Sarkar, S.K.; Jonathan, M.P. Bioaccumulation of metals in fish species from water and sediments in macrotidal Ennore creek, Chennai, SE coast of India: A metropolitan city effect. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 120, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhou, H.; Ma, W.; Han, Q.; Diao, X.; Xue, Q. Concentration distribution and potential health risk of heavy metals in Mactra veneriformis from Bohai Bay, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 97, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Qian, Y.; Chenglei, C.; Feng, H.; Hong, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Kolenčík, M.; Chang, X. Assessment of metal mobility in sediment, commercial fish accumulation and impact on human health risk in a large shallow plateau lake in southwest of China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 194, 110346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Uysal, K.; Köse, E.; Bülbül, M.; Dönmez, M.; Erdogan, Y.; Koyun, M. The comparison of heavy metal accumulation ratios of some fish species in Enne Damme Lake (Kütahya/Turkey). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 157, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mitra, A.; Chowdhury, R.; Banerjee, K. Concentrations of some heavy metals in commercially important finfish and shellfish of the River Ganga. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 2219–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chakraborty, P.; Ramteke, D.; Gadi, S.D.; Bardhan, P. Linkage between speciation of Cd in mangrove sediment and its bioaccumulation in total soft tissue of oyster from the west coast of India. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 106, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saha, N.; Mollah, M.Z.I.; Alam, M.F.; Rahman, M.S. Seasonal investigation of heavy metals in marine fishes captured from the Bay of Bengal and the implications for human health risk assessment. Food Control 2016, 70, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hossain, M.B.; Ahmed, A.S.S.; Sarker, M.S.I. Human health risks of Hg, As, Mn, and Cr through consumption of fish, Ticto barb (Puntius ticto) from a tropical river, Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 31727–31736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zafarzadeh, A.; Bay, A.; Fakhri, Y.; Keramati, H.; Pouya, R.H. Heavy metal (Pb, Cu, Zn, and Cd) concentrations in the water and muscle of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fish and associated non-carcinogenic risk assessment: Alagol wetland in the Golestan, Iran. Toxin Rev. 2018, 37, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chiarelli, R.; Roccheri, M.C. Marine invertebrates as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution. Open J. Met. 2014, 4, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Demirezen, D.; Uruc, K. Comparative study of trace elements in certain fish, meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 2006, 74, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lafabrie, C.; Pergent, G.; Kantin, R.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Gonzalez, J.L. Trace metals assessment in water, sediment, mussel and seagrass species–validation of the use of Posidonia oceanica as a metal biomonitor. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 2033–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Fernandez-Maestre, R.; Johnson-Restrepo, B.; Olivero-Verbel, J. Heavy metals in sediments and fish in the Caribbean coast of Colombia: Assessing the environmental risk. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2018, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anandkumar, A.; Nagarajan, R.; Prabakaran, K.; Bing, C.H.; Rajaram, R.; Li, J.; Du, D. Bioaccumulation of trace metals in the coastal Borneo (Malaysia) and health risk assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 145, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Authman, M.; Zaki, M.S.; Khallaf, E.A.; Abbas, H.H. Use of fish as bio-indicator of the effects of heavy metals pollution. J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2015, 6, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vieira, T.C.; Rodrigues, A.P.C.; Amaral, P.M.G.; de Oliveira, D.F.C.; Rodrigo, A.; Gonçalves Rodrigues e Silva, C.; Vasques, R.O.; Malm, O.; Silva-Filho, E.V.; Godoy, J.M.O.; et al. Evaluation of the bioaccumulation kinetics of toxic metals in fish (A. brasiliensis) and its application on monitoring of coastal ecosystems. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 151, 110830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. USEPA, (Environmental Protection Agency), Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories. Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis, Third Edition from November 2000. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-06/documents/volume2.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2020).
  47. Burger, J. Bioindicators: Types, development, and use in ecological assessment and research. Environ. bioindic. 2006, 1, 22–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sheppard, C.; Al-Husiani, M.; Al-Jamali, F.; Al-Yamani, F.; Baldwin, R.; Bishop, J.; Benzoni, F.; Dutrieux, E.; Dulvy, N.K.; Durvasula, S.R.; et al. The Gulf: A young sea in decline. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60, 3–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Naser, H.A. Assessment and management of heavy metal pollution in the marine environment of the Arabian Gulf: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 72, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Freije, A.M. Heavy metal, trace element and petroleum hydrocarbon pollution in the Arabian Gulf: Review. J. Assoc. Arab. Univ. Basic Appl. Sci. 2015, 17, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. BuTayban, N.A.; Preston, M. The distribution and inventory of total and methylmercury in Kuwait Bay. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 49, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nejatkhah, P.M.; Zardoost, S.; Vosoughi, A. Variation of heavy metal concentration (Cu, Pb, and Cd) in Nemipterus japonicus (Bloch, 1793) and Scolopsis taeniatus (Cuvier, 1830) in hot and cold season in the coastal waters of Bushehr Province (Persian Gulf). Mar. Sci. 2014, 4, 38–43. [Google Scholar]
  53. Al-Najare, G.A.; Jaber, A.A.; Talal, A.H.; Hantoush, A.A. The concentrations of heavy metals (copper, nickel, lead, cadmium, iron, manganese) in Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton, 1822) hunted from Iraqi marine water. Mesop. Environ. J. 2015, 1, 31–43. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rahimi, E.; Gheysari, E. Evaluation of lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury heavy metal residues in fish, shrimp and lobster samples from Persian Gulf. Kafkas Üniversitesi Vet. Fakültesi Derg. 2015, 22, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cunningham, P.A.; Sullivan, E.E.; Everett, K.H.; Kovach, S.S.; Rajan, A.; Barber, M.C. Assessment of metal contamination in Arabian/Persian Gulf fish: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 143, 264–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gerhardt, A. Bioindicator species and their use in biomonitoring. In Environmental Monitoring; Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems; Inyang, H.I., Daniels, J.L., Eds.; UNESCO Eolss Publisher: Oxford, UK, 2009; Volume 1, pp. 77–123. [Google Scholar]
  57. Burger, J.; Gochfeld, M. Heavy metals in commercial fish in New Jersey. Environ. Res. 2005, 99, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ali, M.M.; Ali, M.L.; Islam, M.S.; Rahman, M.Z. Preliminary assessment of heavy metals in water and sediment of Karnaphuli River, Bangladesh. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2016, 5, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Machado, K.S.; Al Ferreira, P.A.; Rizzi, J.; Figueira, R.; Froehner, S. Spatial and temporal variation of heavy metals contamination in recent sediments from Barigui River Basin, South Brazil. Environ. Pollut. Clim. Change 2017, 1, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Liang, H.; Wu, W.L.; Zhang, Y.H.; Zhou, S.J.; Long, C.Y.; Wen, J.; Wang, B.Y.; Liu, Z.T.; Zhang, C.Z.; Huang, P.P.; et al. Levels, temporal trend and health risk assessment of five heavy metals in fresh vegetables marketed in Guangdong Province of China during 2014–2017. Food Control 2018, 92, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ahmed, M.; Bhowmik, A.C.; Rahman, S.; Haque, M.R. Heavy metal concentration in water, sediments, freshwater mussels and fishes of the river shitalakhya, Bangladesh. Asian J. Water Environ. Pollut. 2010, 7, 77–90. [Google Scholar]
  62. Islam, G.R.; Habib, M.R.; Waid, J.L.; Rahman, M.S.; Kabir, J.; Akter, S.; Jolly, Y.N. Heavy metal contamination of freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) and prawn feed in Bangladesh: A market-based study to highlight probable health risks. Chemosphere 2017, 170, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rahman, M.S.; Hossain, M.S.; Ahmed, M.K.; Akther, S.; Jolly, Y.N.; Akhter, S.; Kabir, M.J.; Choudhury, T.R. Assessment of heavy metals contamination in selected tropical marine fish species in Bangladesh and their impact on human health. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2019, 11, 100210. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang, W.; Liu, X.; Cheng, H.; Zeng, E.Y.; Hu, Y. Heavy metal pollution in sediments of a typical mariculture zone in South China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2012, 64, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shibatta, O.A. Reproduçao do pira-brasília, Simpsonichthys boitonei Carvalho (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae), e caracterizaçao de seu habitat na Reserva Ecologica do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Zool. 2005, 22, 1146–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Eastwood, S.; Couture, P. Seasonal variations in condition and liver metal concentrations of yellow perch (Perca flavescens) from a metal-contaminated environment. Aquat. Toxicol. 2002, 58, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dane, H.; Sisman, T. A morpho-histopathological study in the digestive tract of three fish species influenced with heavy metal pollution. Chemosphere 2020, 242, 125212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sheikh, M.; Laghari, M.Y.; Lashari, P.K.; Khooharo, A.R.; Narejo, N.T. Current status of three major carps (Labeo rohita, Cirrhinus mrigala and Catla catla) in the downstream indus river, sindh. Fish Aqua. J. 2017, 8, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  69. Mirza, Z.S.; Nadeem, M.S.; Beg, M.A.; Sulehria, A.Q.K.; Shah, S.I. Current status of fisheries in the Mangla Reservoir, Pakistan. Biologia 2012, 58, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  70. Saleem, M.; Iqbal, J.; Shah, M.H. Study of seasonal variations and risk assessment of selected metals in sediments from Mangla Lake, Pakistan. J. Geochem. Explor. 2013, 125, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Saleem, M.; Iqbal, J.; Shah, M.H. Seasonal variations, risk assessment and multivariate analysis of trace metals in the freshwater reservoirs of Pakistan. Chemosphere 2019, 216, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. USEPA. Technical Standard Operating Procedure, SOP EH-06; adopted from draft ERT/REAC SOP for fish collection; Unites States Environmental Protection Agency: East Helena Site, MT, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  73. Tekin-Ozan, S.; Kir, I. Seasonal variations of heavy metals in some organs of carp (Cyprinus carpio L., 1758) from Beysehir Lake (Turkey). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 138, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jones, B.R.; Laslett, R.E. Methods for analysis for trace metals in marine and other samples, Aquatic Environment Protection: Analytical methods. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research. Lowestoft 1994, 11, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  75. Low, K.H.; Zain, S.M.; Abas, M.R. Evaluation of microwave-assisted digestion condition for the determination of metals in fish samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using experimental designs. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2012, 92, 1161–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Qin, D.; Jiang, H.; Bai, S.; Tang, S.; Mou, Z. Determination of 28 trace elements in three farmed cyprinid fish species from Northeast China. Food Control 2015, 50, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, X.; Liu, X.; He, Y.; Hu, X.; Zha, F.; Liu, G.; Li, H.; Zheng, L.; Dong, Z. Seasonal variations and health risk of heavy metals in the muscle of Crucian carp (Carassius auratus) cultured in subsidence ponds near Suzhou, East-central China. Expo. Health 2016, 8, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Radojevic, M.; Bashkin, V.M. Practical Environmental Analysis; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  79. Emami, K.; Ghazi-Khansari, F.; Abdollahi, M. Heavy metals content of canned tuna fish. Food Chem. 2005, 93, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Usero, J.; GonzBlez-Regalado, E.; Gracia, I. Trace metals in the bivalve molluscs Ruditapes decussatus and Ruditapes philippinarum from the Atlantic coast of southern Spain. Environ. Int. 1997, 23, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Abdel-Khalek, A.A.; Elhaddad, E.; Mamdouh, S.; Marie, M.A.S. Assessment of metal pollution around sabal drainage in River Nile and its impacts on bioaccumulation level, metals correlation and human risk hazard using Oreochromis niloticus as a bioindicator. Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2016, 16, 227–239. [Google Scholar]
  82. Łuczyńska, J.; Paszczyk, B.; Łuczyński, M.J. Fish as a bioindicator of heavy metals pollution in aquatic ecosystem of Pluszne Lake, Poland, and risk assessment for consumer’s health. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 153, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Datta, S.N.; Kaur, V.I.; Dhawan, A.; Jassal, G. Estimation of length-weight relationship and condition factor of spotted snakehead Channa punctata (Bloch) under different feeding regimes. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Ahmed, E.O.; Ali, M.E.; Aziz, A.A.; Rafi, E.M. Length-weight relationships and condition factors of five freshwater fish species in Roseires reservoir, Sudan. Eur. J. Phys. Agric. Sci. 2017, 5, 26–33. [Google Scholar]
  85. Gyimah, E.; Mensah, O.A.J.K.; Bortey-Sam, N. Bioaccumulation factors and multivariate analysis of heavy metals of three edible fish species from the Barekese reservoir in Kumasi, Ghana. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dee, K.H.; Abdullah, F.; Nasir, S.N.A.; Appalasamy, S.; Mohd Ghazi, R.; Eh Rak, A. Health risk assessment of heavy metals from smoked Corbicula fluminea collected on Roadside Vendors at Kelantan, Malaysia. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 9596810, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Iqbal, J.; Shah, M.H. Study of seasonal variations and health risk assessment of heavy metals in Cyprinus carpio from Rawal Lake, Pakistan. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 2025–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lin, M.C. Risk assessment on mixture toxicity of arsenic, zinc and copper intake from consumption of milkfish, Chanos chanos (Forsskal), cultured using contaminated groundwater in Southwest Taiwan. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2009, 83, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. USEPA. USEPA Region III Risk-Based Concentration Table: Technical Background Information; Unites States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  90. Alamdar, A.; Eqani, S.A.M.A.S.; Hanif, N.; Ali, S.M.; Fasola, M.; Bokhari, H.; Katsoyiannis, I.A.; Shen, H. Human exposure to trace metals and arsenic via consumption of fish from river Chenab, Pakistan and associated health risks. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 1004–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Risk-Based Concentration Table. Region 3. Philadelphia, PA. 2010. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/index.htm (accessed on 1 September 2014).
  92. USEPA. Risk-Based Concentration Table. 2011. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/index.htm (accessed on 1 September 2014).
  93. Iqbal, J.; Shah, M.H. Distribution, correlation and risk assessment of selected metals in urban soils from Islamabad, Pakistan. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. StatSoft. STATISTICA for Windows; Computer Programme Manual: Tulsa, OK, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bibi, N.; Shah, M.H.; Khan, N.; Mahmood, Q.; Aldosari, A.A.; Abbasi, A.M. Analysis and health risk assessment of heavy metals in some onion varieties. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Carvalho, M.L.; Santiago, S.; Nunes, M.L. Assessment of the essential element and heavy metal content of edible fish muscle. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 382, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yilmaz, A.B.; Sangun, M.K.; Yaglioglu, D.; Turan, C. Metals (major, essential to non-essential) composition of the different tissues of three demersal fish species from Iskenderun Bay, Turkey. Food Chem. 2010, 123, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mogobe, O.; Mosepele, K.; Masamba, W.R.L. Essential mineral content of common fish species in Chanoga, Okavango Delta, Botswana. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2015, 9, 480–486. [Google Scholar]
  99. Kalyoncu, L.; Kalyoncu, H.; Arslan, G. Determination of heavy metals and metals levels in five fish species from Isikli Dam Lake and Karacaoren Dam Lake (Turkey). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 2231–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Stranges, S.; Navas-Acien, A.; Rayman, M.P.; Guallar, E. Selenium status and cardiometabolic health: State of the evidence. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2010, 20, 754–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Pieczynska, J.; Grajeta, H. The role of selenium in human conception and pregnancy. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2015, 29, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Amaral, A.F.; Cantor, K.P.; Silverman, D.T.; Malats, N. Selenium and bladder cancer risk: A metaanalysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2010, 19, 2407–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Rayman, M.P. Selenium and human health. Lancet 2012, 379, 1256–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Alam, M.G.M.; Tanaka, A.; Allinson, G.; Laurenson, L.J.B.; Stagnitti, F.; Snow, E.T. A comparison of trace element concentrations in cultured and wild carp (Cyprinus carpio) of Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2002, 53, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Schenone, N.F.; Avigliano, E.; Goessler, W.; Cirelli, A.F. Toxic metals, trace and major elements determined by ICPMS in tissues of Parapimelodus valenciennis and Prochilodus lineatus from Chascomus Lake, Argentina. Microchem. J. 2014, 112, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Erdogrul, O.; Erbilir, F. Heavy metal and trace elements in various fish samples from Sır Dam Lake, Kahramanmaras, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 130, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Edelstein, S.; Sharlin, J. Life Cycle Nutrition: An Evidence-Based Approach; Jones & Bartlett Learning: Sudburry, MA, USA, 2009; Volume 1, p. 198. [Google Scholar]
  108. Sayre, L.M.; Perry, G.; Atwood, C.S.; Smith, M.A. The role of metals in neurodegenerative diseases. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2000, 46, 731–741. [Google Scholar]
  109. Adebiyi, F.M.; Sonibare, J.A.; Adedosu, T.A.; Daramola, A.A.; Omode, P.E.; Obanijesu, E.O. Assessment of the effects of air pollution using road-side roasted meats (Suya) as indicators. Environ. Bioindic. 2008, 3, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Rasmussen, M.L.; Folsom, A.R.; Catellier, D.J.; Tsai, M.Y.; Garg, U.; Eckfeldt, J.H. A prospective study of coronary heart disease and the hemochromatosis gene (HFE) C282Y mutation: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Atherosclerosis 2001, 154, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Atolaiye, B.O.; Babalola, J.O.; Adebayo, M.A.; Aremu, M.O. Equilibrium modeling and pH dependence of the adsorption capacity of Vitex doniana leaf for metal ions in aqueous solutions. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 507–514. [Google Scholar]
  112. Hao, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, X.; Yu, Y.; Fu, J. Trace elements in fish from Taihu Lake, China: Levels, associated risks, and trophic transfer. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 90, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kumar, M.; Gupta, N.; Ratn, A.; Awasthi, Y.; Prasad, R.; Trivedi, A.; Trivedi, S.P. Biomonitoring of heavy metals in river ganga water, sediments, plant, and fishes of different trophic levels. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 193, 536–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. WHO. Health criteria other supporting information. In Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, 2nd ed.; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000; Volume 2, pp. 31–388. [Google Scholar]
  115. FAO. Compilation of Legal Limits for Hazardous Substances in Fish and Fishery Products. FAO Fishery Circular No. 464; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2000; pp. 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  116. Oruch, R.; Elderbi, M.A.; Khattab, H.A.; Pryme, I.F.; Lund, A. Lithium: A review of pharmacology, clinical uses, and toxicity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 740, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. El-Said, G.F.; El-Sadaawy, M.M.; Shobier, A.H.; Ramadan, S.E. Human Health Implication of Major and Trace Elements Present in Commercial Crustaceans of a Traditional Seafood Marketing Region, Egypt. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 199, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Marshall, T.M. Lithium as a Nutrient. J. Am. Physicians Surg. 2015, 20, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  119. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Strontium; Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; pp. 1–445. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp159.pdf (accessed on 3 October 2020).
  120. Chen, M.; Tang, Y.L.; Ao, J.; Wang, D. Effects of strontium on photosynthetic characteristics of oilseed rape seedlings. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 59, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sivaperumal, P.; Sankar, T.V.; Nair, P.G. Heavy metal concentration in fish, shellfish and fish products from internal markets of India vis-a-vis international standards. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Anandkumar, A.; Nagarajan, R.; Prabakaran, K.; Rajaram, R. Trace metal dynamics and risk assessment in the commercially important marine shrimp species collected from the Miri coast, Sarawak, East Malaysia. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2017, 16, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. MAFF. Monitoring and Surveillance of Non-Radioactive Contaminants in the Aquatic Environment and Activities Regulating the Disposal of Wastes at Sea, 1997; Aquatic Environment Monitoring Report Number 52; Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF): Lowestoft, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  124. Sengil, A.; Ozacar, M.; Turkmenler, H. Kinetic and isotherm studies of Cu (II) biosorption onto valonia tannin resin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Arulkumar, A.; Paramasivam, S.; Rajaram, R. Toxic heavy metals in commercially important food fishes collected from Palk Bay, Southeastern India. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 119, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Storelli, A.; Barone, G.; Dambrosio, A.; Garofalo, R.; Busco, A.; Storelli, M.M. Occurrence of trace metals in fish from South Italy: Assessment risk to consumer’s health. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2020, 90, 103487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. USEPA. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Waste, EPA Report 600/4-79-020; Office of Water, Unites States Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  128. França, S.; Vinagre, C.; Caçador, I.; Cabral, H.N. Heavy metal concentrations in sediment, benthicinvertebrates and fish in three salt marsh areas subjected to different pollution loads in the Tagus Estuary (Portugal). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 50, 993–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Dey, S.K.; Roy, S. Effects of chromium on certain aspects of cellular toxicity. Iran. J. Toxicol. 2009, 2, 260–267. [Google Scholar]
  130. Forti, E.; Salovaara, S.; Cetin, Y. In vitro evaluation of the toxicity induced by nickel soluble and particulate forms in human airway epithelial cells. Toxicol. Vitr. 2011, 25, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Gumpu, M.B.; Sethuraman, S.; Krishnan, U.M.; Rayappan, J.B.B. A review on detection of heavy metal ions in water–An electrochemical approach. Sens. Actuators 2015, B 213, 515–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Eisler, R. Nickel Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review; US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center: Prince George’s County, MD, USA, 1998; pp. 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  133. WHO. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 4th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  134. Barringer, J.L.; Szabo, Z.; Reilly, P.A. Occurrence and mobility of mercury in groundwater. In Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability; Intech Publishing: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 117–147. [Google Scholar]
  135. Atique Ullah, A.K.M.; Maksud, M.A.; Khan, S.R.; Lutfa, L.N.; Quraishi, S.B. Dietary intake of heavy metals from eight highly consumed species of cultured fish and possible human health risk implications in Bangladesh. Toxicol. Rep. 2017, 4, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. European Commission. Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006. Setting Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Foodstuffs; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  137. Velusamy, A.; Satheeshkumar, P.; Anirudh, R.; Chinnadurai, S. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in commercially important marine fishes from Mumbai harbour, India. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 81, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Garcia-Leston, J.; Mendez, J.; Pasaro, E.; Laffon, B. Genotoxic effects of lead: An updated review. Environ. Int. 2010, 36, 623–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Azizullah, A.; Khattak, M.N.K.; Richter, P.; Hader, D.P. Water pollution in Pakistan and its impact on public health—A review. Environ. Int. 2011, 37, 479–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Rahman, M.S.; Molla, A.H.; Saha, N.; Rahman, A. Study on heavy metals levels and its risk assessment in some edible fishes from Bangshi River, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 1847–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jamil, T.; Lias, K.; Norsila, D.; Syafinaz, N.S. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in squid (Loligo spp.) tissues of Kedah-Perlis waters, Malaysia. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2014, 18, 195–203. [Google Scholar]
  142. Dikanovic, V.; Skoric, S.; Gacic, Z. Concentrations of metals and trace elements in different tissues of nine fish species from the Meduvrsje Reservoir (West Morava River Basin, Serbia). Arch. Biol. Sci. 2016, 68, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Ranjbar, G.H.A.; Sotoudehnia, F. Heavy Metals in Muscle of Mugli auratus from Caspian Sea in Relation to Length, Age and Sex. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2005, 14, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  144. Salamat, N.; Khalifi, K.; Movahedinia, A. Health Concerns Related to Consumption of Fish from Anzali Wetland. Clean Soil Air Water 2016, 44, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kucuksezgin, F.; Gonul, L.T.; Tasel, D. Total and inorganic arsenic levels in some marine organisms from Izmir Bay (Eastern Aegean Sea): A risk assessment. Chemosphere 2014, 112, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Demirak, A.; Yilma, F.; Tuna, A.L.; Ozdemir, N. Heavy metals in water, sediment and tissues of Leuciscus cephalus from a stream in southwestern Turkey. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 1451–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Qadir, A.; Malik, R.N. Heavy metals in eight edible fish species from two polluted tributaries (Aik and Palkhu) of the River Chenab, Pakistan. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 143, 1524–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Gorur, F.K.; Keser, R.; Akcay, N.; Dizman, S. Radioactivity and heavy metal concentrations of some commercial fish species consumed in the Black Sea Region of Turkey. Chemosphere 2012, 87, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Wang, L.F.; Yang, L.Y.; Kong, L.H.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.R.; Wang, Y.Q. Spatial distribution, source identification and pollution assessment of metal content in the surface sediments of Nansi Lake, China. J. Geochem. Explor. 2014, 140, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Dong, R.; Jia, Z.; Li, S. Risk assessment and sources identification of soil heavy metals in a typical county of Chongqing Municipality, Southwest China. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 113, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Z.; Cai, Y. Heavy metal pollution in reservoirs in the hilly area of southern China: Distribution, source apportionment and health risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Varol, M. Dissolved heavy metal concentrations of the Kralkızı, Dicle and Batman dam reservoirs in the Tigris River basin, Turkey. Chemosphere 2013, 93, 954–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zhao, L.; Xu, Y.; Hou, H.; Shangguan, Y.; Li, F. Source identification and health risk assessment of metals in urban soils around the Tanggu chemical industrial district, Tianjin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468–469, 654–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Li, S.; Zhang, Q. Risk assessment and seasonal variations of dissolved trace elements and heavy metals in the Upper Han River, China. J. Hazard Mater. 2010, 181, 1051–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Cai, L.; Xu, Z.; Bao, P.; He, M.; Dou, L.; Chen, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Y. Multivariate and geostatistical analyses of the spatial distribution and source of arsenic and heavy metals in the agricultural soils in Shunde, Southeast China. J. Geochem. Explor. 2015, 148, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Javed, M.; Usmani, N. Accumulation of heavy metals and human health risk assessment via the consumption of freshwater fish Mastacembelus armatus inhabiting, thermal power plant effluent loaded canal. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Li, J.; Huang, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Yang, H. Potential risk assessment of trace metals by consuming shellfish collected from Xiamen, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 2937–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location map of the study area.
Figure 1. Location map of the study area.
Jmse 10 00933 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of average metal levels (µg/g ± SE) in the muscles, gills and scales of Catla catla.
Figure 2. Comparison of average metal levels (µg/g ± SE) in the muscles, gills and scales of Catla catla.
Jmse 10 00933 g002
Figure 3. Cluster analysis of selected metals in Catla catla.
Figure 3. Cluster analysis of selected metals in Catla catla.
Jmse 10 00933 g003
Table 1. Values of biometric parameters in Catla catla.
Table 1. Values of biometric parameters in Catla catla.
Weight (g)
(W)
Length (cm)
(L)
Coefficient of Condition (g/cm3)
(K)
Min47329.71.00
Max98846.01.80
Mean62936.31.33
Median58835.51.30
SD1434.200.26
Table 2. Statistical summary of selected metal distribution (µg/g) and metal pollution index (MPI) in various tissues of Catla catla.
Table 2. Statistical summary of selected metal distribution (µg/g) and metal pollution index (MPI) in various tissues of Catla catla.
AsCaCdCoCrCuFeHgKLiMgMnNaNiPbSeSrZnMPI
MusclesMin0.675500.280.120.450.8811.60.179550.121291.044490.691.721.552.6061.23.73
Max1.5820810.564.081.882.7826.80.5716320.383124.338963.067.813.559.2721512.7
Mean1.049440.402.081.051.5718.10.3312540.241872.076391.864.092.595.101107.57
Median1.017690.402.151.061.4117.50.3012490.251711.636191.933.722.714.781017.20
SD0.244580.071.180.440.524.060.111620.0848.80.961100.671.740.541.7643.8
GillsMin0.7148170.363.082.342.4758.30.217110.7671617.713061.335.932.7730.4146315.4
Max1.1782881.3914.010.15.261321.5911192.43138331.7211012.824.84.4159.4218040.7
Mean0.9365200.837.895.844.0394.30.818961.6297625.316986.5513.13.6444.1178527.9
Median0.9264090.848.245.884.0298.40.828981.7393625.916928.1512.63.6443.3178828.4
SD0.118900.303.292.100.8223.70.431060.511763.631974.235.420.427.73189
ScalesMin0.1238670.541.820.871.8920.70.051260.713648.684850.393.561.5119.52096.78
Max0.3356321.218.506.763.5644.80.234881.6857117.09805.0610.92.9238.656119.2
Mean0.2147810.824.943.172.5731.50.122811.0146312.87192.606.742.2329.035512.5
Median0.1948120.795.712.732.4731.20.102870.9346413.07052.426.642.2329.234412.2
SD0.064960.182.232.030.456.880.051090.2754.42.221321.411.960.374.7991.1
Tolerable and permissible levels of selected metals in the muscles of fish
USEPA (1983) ----8120--------4--480-
MAFF (2000) --0.2--20--------2--50-
WHO (2000) 1-0.50.50.15301090.5---1-300.5----
FAO (2000) 1-0.50.5-301800.5---0.5-552--30-
EC Regulation (2006) --0.1----0.5------0.3----
Table 3. Comparison of measured average metal levels (µg/g) in the muscles of Catla catla and other reported levels worldwide.
Table 3. Comparison of measured average metal levels (µg/g) in the muscles of Catla catla and other reported levels worldwide.
AsCaCdCoCrCuFeHgKLiMgMnNaNiPbSeSrZnReferences
1.049440.402.081.051.5718.10.3312540.241872.076391.864.092.595.10110Present Study
-132.42.272.813.481.612.33-29523.19202.29.944671.572.41-10.7724.27[99]
--0.7454.9172.3891.2939.835----0.487--8.796--24.23[87]
0.27-<0.010.0582.231.3552.1--0.046-1.58-1.041.32.2822.920.8[105]
0.090-0.014BDL0.1730.2417.120.010-0.013-0.1-0.1650.1810.231.156.62[76]
--0.0060.01 1.2612.310.76------0.02--30.6[29]
0.166-0.011-0.4-15.90.073---1.95--0.047--24.4[112]
0.095-0.0090.0050.0670.2492.729----0.307-0.0410.0310.3-5.433[104]
--0.840.230.3650.520.85------0.080.22--0.92[113]
-4130---0.241.5-2490-3500.6860----16.3[98]
--0.020.10.050.66-0.04-----0.160.06--3.42[126]
Table 4. Principle component analysis of selected metals in Catla catla.
Table 4. Principle component analysis of selected metals in Catla catla.
PC 1PC 2PC 3PC 4PC 5
Eigenvalue5.7144.3371.7761.5841.323
Total Variance (%)31.7424.109.8698.7997.347
Cumulative Eigenvalue (%)5.71410.0511.8313.4114.73
Cumulative Variance (%)31.7455.8465.7174.5181.86
As----0.689
Ca-0.843---
Cd---0.806-
Co--0.736--
Cr--0.792--
Cu0.836----
Fe0.877----
Hg----0.872
K0.825----
Li---0.898-
Mg0.769----
Mn-0.805---
Na0.866----
Ni---0.769-
Pb----0.630
Se--0.837--
Sr-0.893---
Zn0.871----
Only main values are presented.
Table 5. Description of health risk assessment for selected metals in the muscles of Catla catla from Mangle Lake.
Table 5. Description of health risk assessment for selected metals in the muscles of Catla catla from Mangle Lake.
RfD/RDA (mg/kg/day, Wet Weight)PTWI *PTDI *EWIEDITHQTCR
As0.00030.0150.0020.0260.00412.365.56E-03
Ca13.3399.3314.1923.593.3700.253
Cd0.0010.0070.0010.0100.00141.4388.63E-04
Co0.060.420.060.0520.0070.124
Cr0.0030.0210.0030.0260.0041.2421.86E-03
Cu0.043.50.50.0390.0060.140
Fe0.75.60.80.4530.0650.093
Hg0.00030.0050.00070.0080.0013.900
K78.0548.378.3331.354.4780.057
Li0.0020.140.020.0060.0010.436
Mg5.8340.835.8334.6750.6680.115
Mn0.140.980.140.0520.0070.053
Na553855515.972.2820.041
Ni0.0200.0350.0050.0460.0070.3311.13E-02
Pb0.0040.0250.0040.1020.0157.2971.24E-04
Se0.0052.80.40.0650.0091.851
Sr0.64.20.60.1270.0180.030
Zn0.3712.7510.3931.310
HI31.07
* Provisional permissible tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) in mg/week/kg body weight; Permissible tolerable daily intake (PTDI), in mg/day/kg body weight.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saleem, M.; Iqbal, J.; Shi, Z.; Garrett, S.H.; Shah, M.H. Distribution and Bioaccumulation of Essential and Toxic Metals in Tissues of Thaila (Catla catla) from a Natural Lake, Pakistan and Its Possible Health Impact on Consumers. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070933

AMA Style

Saleem M, Iqbal J, Shi Z, Garrett SH, Shah MH. Distribution and Bioaccumulation of Essential and Toxic Metals in Tissues of Thaila (Catla catla) from a Natural Lake, Pakistan and Its Possible Health Impact on Consumers. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(7):933. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saleem, Muhammad, Javed Iqbal, Zongbo Shi, Scott H. Garrett, and Munir H. Shah. 2022. "Distribution and Bioaccumulation of Essential and Toxic Metals in Tissues of Thaila (Catla catla) from a Natural Lake, Pakistan and Its Possible Health Impact on Consumers" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10, no. 7: 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop