Toward Improved Adoption of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the Lake Erie Basin: Perspectives from Resilience and Agricultural Innovation Literature
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Current Modeling Studies
3. Social Factors that Affect the Adoption of Structural BMPs
4. Insights from the Resilience Lens
5. Innovation in Agriculture and Knowledge Circulation
6. Knowledge Circulation in Relation to P-Related Agricultural BMPs
7. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Smith, D.R.; Francesconi, W.; Livingston, S.J.; Huang, C. Phosphorus losses from monitored fields with conservation practices in the Lake Erie Basin, USA. Ambio 2015, 44 (Suppl. 2), 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, D.R.; King, K.W.; Johnson, L.; Francesconi, W.; Richards, P.; Baker, D.; Sharpley, A.N. Surface Runoff and Tile Drainage Transport of Phosphorus in the Midwestern United States. J. Environ. Qual. 2015, 44, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davis, T.W.; Berry, D.L.; Boyer, G.L.; Gobbler, C.J. The effects of temperature and nutrients on the growth and dynamics of toxic and non-toxic strains of Mycrocystis during cyanobacteria blooms. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridgeman, T.B.; Chaffin, J.D.; Kane, D.D.; Conroy, J.D.; Panek, S.E.; Panek, P.M. Armenio From river to lake: Phosphorus partitioning and algal community compositional changes in Western Lake Erie. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 2012, 38, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wynne, T.T.; Stumpf, R.P.; Tomlinson, M.C.; Fahnenstiel, G.L.; Dyble, J.; Schwab, D.J.; Joshi, S.J. Evolution of a cyanobacterial bloom forecast system in western Lake Erie: Development and initial evaluation. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 2013, 39, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Environment and Climate Change Canada. Phosphorous Levels in the Great Lakes. 2017. Available online: https://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=en&n=A5EDAE56-1 (accessed on 20 April 2017).
- Ulén, B.; Aronsson, H.; Bechmann, M.; Krogstad, T.; Oygarden, L.; Stenberg, M. Soil tillage methods to control phosphorus loss and potential sideeffects: A Scandinavian review. Soil Use Manag. 2010, 26, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, K.W.; Williams, M.R.; Macrae, M.L.; Fausey, N.R.; Frankenberger, J.; Smith, D.R.; Kleinman, P.J.A.; Brown, L.C. Phosphorus transport in agricultural subsurface drainage: A review. J. Environ. Qual. 2015, 44, 467–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- International Joint Commission (IJC). A Balanced Diet for Lake Erie: Reducing Phosphorus Loadings and Harmful Algal Blooms. Available online: http://www.ijc.org/files/publications/2014%20IJC%20LEEP%20REPORT.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Scavia, D.; Allan, J.D.; Arend, K.K.; Bartell, S.; Beletsky, D.; Bosch, N.S.; Brandt, S.B.; Briland, R.D.; Daloğlu, I.; DePinto, J.V.; et al. Assessing and addressing the re-eutrophication of Lake Erie: Central basin hypoxia. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 2014, 40, 226–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, K.W.; Williams, M.R.; Fausey, N.R. Contributions of Systematic Tile Drainage to Watershed-Scale Phosphorus Transport. J. Environ. Qual. 2015, 44, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chung, E. CBCNEWS: Lake Erie’s Algae Explosion Blamed on Farmers. 2014. Available online: http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/lake-erie-s-algae-explosion-blamed-on-farmers-1.2729327 (accessed on 25 March 2017).
- Fischer, M. Tile Drains a Major Path for Phosphorus Loss, Studies Find. American Society of Agronomy, 2014. Available online: https://www.agronomy.org/science-news/tile-drains-major-path-phosphorus-loss-studies-find (accessed on 1 March 2017).
- Ross, J.A.; Herbert, M.E.; Sowa, S.P.; Frankenberger, J.R.; King, K.W.; Christopher, S.F.; Tank, J.L.; Arnold, J.G.; White, M.J.; Yen, H. A synthesis and comparative evaluation of factors influencing the effectiveness of drainage water management. Agric. Water Manag. 2016, 178, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keitzer, S.; Ludsin, S.A.; Sowa, S.; Annis, G.; Daggupati, P.; Froelich, A.M.; Herbert, M.E.; Johnson, M.V.; Yen, H.; White, M.J.; et al. Thinking outside the lake: How might Lake Erie nutrient management benefit stream conservation in the watershed? J. Gt. Lakes Res. 2016, 42, 1322–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, H.; White, M.J.; Arnold, J.G.; Keitzer, S.C.; Johnson, M.-V.V.; Atwood, J.D.; Daggupati, P.; Herbert, M.E.; Sowa, S.P.; Ludsin, S.A. Western Lake Erie Basin: Soft-data-constrained, NHDPlus resolution watershed modeling and exploration of applicable conservation scenarios. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569, 1265–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiang, L.C.; Chaubey, I.; Hong, N.M.; Lin, Y.P.; Huang, T. Implementation of BMP strategies for adaptation to climate change and land use change in a pasture-dominated watershed. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 3654–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. The Economics of Beneficial Management Practices. WEBs Fact Sheet #8. AAFC No 11781E. 2012. Available online: http://www.agr.gc.ca/resources/prod/doc/pdf/webs_epbh_eco-eng.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2017).
- Kim, S.-A.; Geffrey, G.P.; Krishna, P.P. The Effect of Economic Factors on the Adoption of Best Management Practices in Beef Cattle Production. Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, 2004. Available online: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/34670/1/sp04ki05.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2017).
- Rao, N.S.; Easton, Z.M.; Lee, D.R.; Steenhuis, T.S. Economic analysis of best management practices to reduce watershed phosphorous losses. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41, 855–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carpenter, S.R.; Walker, B.H.; Anderies, J.M.; Abel, N. From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 2001, 4, 765–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, B.; Salt, D. Resilience Practice; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- O’Connell, D.; Walker, B.; Abel, N.; Grigg, N. The Resilience, Adaptation and Transformation Assessment Framework: From Theory to Application. Available online: http://www.stapgef.org/sites/default/files/documents/CSIRO-STAP-Resilience-Adaptation-Transformation-Assessment-Framework-Report.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Hammond, B. Developing a Resilience Framework to Analyze Farmer Perspectives on Threat and Vulnerability to Catastrophic Events in Western Washington State. Available online: http://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1112&context=wwuet (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Chapin, F.S.; Folke, C.; Kofinas, G.P. (Eds.) A Framework for Understanding Change. In Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ostrom, E. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 2009, 325, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ostrom, E.; Janssen, M.A.; M, J. Anderies Going beyond panaceas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15176–15178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scholz, R.W. Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Epstein, G.; Vogt, J.M.; Mincey, S.K.; Cox, M.; Fischer, B. Missing ecology: Integrating ecological perspectives with the social-ecological system framework. Int. J. Commons 2013, 7, 432–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binder, C.R.; Hinkel, J.; Bots, P.W.G.; Pahl-Wostl, C. Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fabinyi, M.; Evans, L.; Foale, S.J. Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: Insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogt, J.M.; Epstein, G.B.; Mincey, S.K.; Fischer, B.C.; Mccord, P. Putting the “E” in SES: Unpacking the ecology in the Ostrom social-ecological system framework. Ecol. Soc. 2015, 20, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lisa, E.; Schipper, F.; Langston, L. A Comparative Overview of Resilience Measurements Frameworks: Analysing Indicators and Approaches. Available online: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9754.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed.; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Djalante, R.; Holley, C.; Thomalla, F. Adaptive Governance and Managing Resilience to Natural Hazards. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 2011, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Cabell, J.F.; Oelofse, M. An Indicator Framework for Assessing Agro-ecosystem Resilience. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kofinas, G.P.; Chapin, F.S. Sustaining livelihoods and human well-being during socio-ecological change. In Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship; Chapin, F.S., Kofinas, G.P., Folke, C., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Berkes, F.; Folke, C. Back to the Future: Ecosystem Dynamics and Local Knowledge; Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., Eds.; Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Grigg, N.; Abel, N.; O’Connell, D.; Walker, B. Available online: http://www.stapgef.org/sites/default/files/documents/CSIRO-STAP-Resilience-assessment-desktop-case-studies-in-Thailand-and-Niger.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Armitage, D.; Berkes, F.; Doubleday, N. Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-Level Governance; UBC Press: Vancouver, BC, Canada; Toronto, ON, Canada, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Zerner, C. (Ed.) People, Plants, and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation; University Press: Columbia, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Colfer, C.J.P. The Equitable Forest: Diversity, Community, and Resource Management; Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Young, O.R. Institutions and Environmental Change, Principal Findings, Applications and Research Frontiers. Available online: http://2007amsterdamconference.org/Downloads/AC2007_Young.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Folke, C.; Hahn, T.; Olsson, P.; Norberg, J. Adaptive governance of socio-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30, 441–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kofinas, G.P. Adaptive co-management in socio-ecological governance. In Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship; Chapin, F.S., Kofinas, G.P., Folke, C., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Plummer, R.; FitzGibbon, J. Co-management of natural resources: A proposed framework. Environ. Manag. 2004, 33, 876–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastakoti, R.C.; Shivakoti, G.P.; Lebel, L. Local Irrigation Management Institutions Mediate Changes Driven by External Policy and Market Pressures in Nepal and Thailand. Environ. Manag. 2010, 46, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schut, M.; Rodenburg, L.; Klerkx, L.; van Ast, A.; Bastianns, L. Systems approaches to innovation in crop protection. A systematic literature review. Crop Prot. 2014, 56, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pant, L.P. Critical systems of learning and innovation competence for addressing complexity in transformations to agricultural sustainability. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2013, 38, 336–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botta, G.F.; Tolón-Becerra, A.; Lastra-Bravo, X.; Tourn, M.C. A research of the environmental and social effects of the adoption of biotechnological practices for soybean cultivation in Argentina. Am. J. Plant. Sci. 2011, 2, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, T. Geography of Innovation. Available online: http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199874002/obo-9780199874002-0131.xml (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Klerkx, L.; van Mierlo, B.; Leeuwis, C. Evolution of Systems Approaches to Agricultural Innovation: Concepts, Analysis and Interventions, Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-007-4503-2_20 (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Daouda, O.; Bryant, C.R. Analysis of Power Relations among Actors and Institutions in the Process of Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change and Variability from the Diffusion of Innovations Perspective. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305391812_Analysis_of_Power_Relations_among_Actors_and_Institutions_in_the_Process_of_Agricultural_Adaptation_to_Climate_Change_and_Variability_from_the_Diffusion_of_Innovations_Perspective (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Schut, M.; Klerkx, L.; Rodenburg, J.; Kayeke, J.; Hinnou, L.C.; Raboanarielina, C.M.; Bastiaans, L. RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity. Agric. Syst. 2015, 132, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sunding, D.; Zilberman, D. The Agricultural Innovation Process: Research and Technology Adoption in a Changing Agricultural Sector. Handb. Agric. Econ. 2000. Available online: http://www.cpahq.org/cpahq/cpadocs/Agricult%20Innovation.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2017).
- Rodima-Taylor, D.; Olwig, M.F.; Chhetri, N. Adaptation as innovation, innovation as adaptation: An institutional approach to climate change. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 33, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivera, M.W.; Alex, G.; Hanson, J.; Birner, R. Enabling Agriculture: The Evolution and Promise of Agricultural Knowledge Frameworks. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference of the Association for International Agricultural Education and Extension (AIAEE), Clearwater Beach, FL, USA, 14–18 May 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Spielman, D.; Birner, R. How Innovative Is Your Agriculture? Using Innovation Indicators and Benchmarks to Strengthen National and Agricultural Innovation Systems; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Arnold, E.; Bell, M. Some New Ideas about Research and Development; Science and Technology Policy Research/Technopolis: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, L.M.; Paudel, K.P.; Gauthier, W.M.; Westra, J.V. Decision to adopt and exit best management practices by dairy farmers. Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness. Louisiana State University. In Proceedings of the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Oregon, Portland, 29 July–1 August 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Vollmer-Sanders, C.; Allmen, A.; Busdeker, D.; Moody, L.B.; Stanley, W.G. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 2016, 42, 1395–1402. [CrossRef]
- Benham, B.L.; Braccia, A.; Mostaghimi, S.; Lowery, J.B.; McClellan, P.W. Comparison of Best Management Practice Adoption between Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Basin and Southern Rivers Watersheds. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Saied_Mostaghimi/publication/251852639_Comparison_of_Best_Management_Practice_Adoption_Between_Virginia%27s_Chesapeake_Bay_Basin_and_Southern_Rivers_Watersheds/links/00b7d52dbf9367a945000000/Comparison-of-Best-Management-Practice-Adoption-Between-Virginias-Chesapeake-Bay-Basin-and-Southern-Rivers-Watersheds.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Filson, G.C.; Sethuratnam, S.; Adekunle, B.; Lamba, P. Beneficial Management Practice Adoption in Five Southern Ontario Watersheds. J. Sustain. Agric. 2009, 33, 229–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prokopy, L.S.; Floress, K.; Klotthor-Weinkauf, D.; Baumgart-Getz, A. Determinants of Agricultural Best Management Practice Adoption: Evidence from the Literature. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2008, 63, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumgart-Getz, A.; Prokopy, L.S.; Floress, K. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 96, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knowler, D.; Bradshaw, B. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of the recent literature. Food Policy 2007, 32, 25–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabii, T.; Horwitz, P. A review of landholder motivations and determinants for participation in conservation covenanting programmes. Environ. Conserv. 2006, 33, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reimer, A.P.; Weinkauf, D.K.; Prokopy, L.S. The influence of perceptions of practice characteristics: An examination of agricultural best management practice adoption in two Indiana watersheds. J. Rural Stud. 2012, 28, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reimer, A.P.; Thompson, A.W.; Prokopy, L.S. The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: Implications for conservation adoption. Agric. Human Values 2012, 29, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallander, S.; Aillery, M.; Hellerstein, D.; Hand, M. The Role of Conservation Programs in Drought Risk Adaptation. Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/45066/37191_err-148-summary.pdf?v=41744 (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Bryant, C.R.; Akkari, C.; Bousbaine, A.D.; Daouda, O.; Delusca, K.; Épulé, T.E.; Drouin-Lavigne, C. The roles of governments and other actors in adaptation to climate change and variability: The examples of agriculture and coastal communities. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2016, 3, 326–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akkari, C.; Bryant, C.R. The co-construction approach to developing adaptation strategies in the face of climate change and variability: A Conceptual Framework. Agric. Res. 2016, 5, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akkari, C.; Bryant, C.R.; Marois, C. The co-construction of agricultural policies as a bottom-up adaptation strategy to climate change and variability (CCV) in the Regional County Municipality (RCM) of Haut-Richelieu, Québec. J. Agric. Stud. 2017, 5, 141–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klerkx, L.; Aarts, N.; Leeuwis, C. Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agric. Syst. 2010, 103, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westley, F.; Olsson, P.; Folke, C.; Homer-Dixon, T.; Vredenburg, H.; Loorbach, D.; Thompson, J.; Nilsson, M.; Lambin, E.; Sendzimir, J.; et al. Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio 2011, 40, 762–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leeuwis, C.; Schut, M.; Waters-Bayer, A.; Mur, R.; Atta-Krah, K.; Douthwaite, B. Capacity to Innovate from a System-CRP Perspective. Available online: http://www.prolinnova.net/sites/default/files/documents/news/2014/capacitytoinnovatebrieffinal_010514.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2017).
- Anderies, J.M.; Walker, B.H.; Kinzig, A.P. Fifteen weddings and a funeral: Case studies and resilience—Based management. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundholm, C.; Plummer, R. Resilience and learning: A conspectus for environmental education. Environ. Educ. Res. 2010, 16, 475–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Socioeconomic Factors the Adoption of BMPs |
---|
Farm’s diversification |
Social networks (e.g., increased contact with Natural Resources Conservation Service, and Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service) |
Being near a stream or a river running through the farm |
Farmer’s education level |
Famer’s income |
Biophysical factors (i.e., slope) |
Classification of Structural BMPs Used within WEBs | Structural BMPs |
---|---|
Riparian | Cattle exclusion fencing and off-stream watering |
Off-stream watering without fencing | |
Riparian vegetation management | |
In-Field | Nutrient input/management |
Tillage/crop residue management | |
Crop rotation | |
Perennial cover | |
Reduced herbicide use | |
Winter bale-grazing | |
Irrigation efficiency | |
Runoff/discharge | Diversion terraces and grassed waterways |
Surface runoff control measures | |
Buffer strips | |
Farmyard runoff management | |
Runoff retention pond | |
Small reservoirs |
Category | Sub-Category | Adoption Rate |
---|---|---|
Capacity | Education (farmer education or training) | + |
Capital (measure of investment into the farm, excluding acres) | + | |
Income (measure of wealth, such as crop value,…) | + | |
Farm size (number of acres farmed) | + | |
Social networks (connectivity to agency personnel, networking capacity in the agri-business sector, and interaction with neighbouring farms as well as major organizations) | + | |
Environmental Attitudes | Adoption payments (for participating in conservation programs) | + |
Farm succession (farm will be taken over by a family member) | + | |
Farmer’s perception of the current quality of the environment | + | |
Willingness to take risks | + | |
Environmental Awareness | Cause (understanding how agriculture can impact environmental quality) | + |
Consequence (understanding the consequences of a degraded system) | + | |
Knowledge (knowledge of general terms or facts related to environmental quality as well as knowledge of non-point source (NPS) programs or efforts | + |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Akkari, C.; Robin Bryant, C. Toward Improved Adoption of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the Lake Erie Basin: Perspectives from Resilience and Agricultural Innovation Literature. Agriculture 2017, 7, 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7070054
Akkari C, Robin Bryant C. Toward Improved Adoption of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the Lake Erie Basin: Perspectives from Resilience and Agricultural Innovation Literature. Agriculture. 2017; 7(7):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7070054
Chicago/Turabian StyleAkkari, Cherine, and Christopher Robin Bryant. 2017. "Toward Improved Adoption of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the Lake Erie Basin: Perspectives from Resilience and Agricultural Innovation Literature" Agriculture 7, no. 7: 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7070054