Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Possible Noise Reduction Arrangements inside Olive Oil Mills: A Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring and Precision Spraying for Orchid Plantation with Wireless WebCAMs
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperReview
Agriculture 2017, 7(10), 86;

Adapting Agricultural Production Systems to Climate Change—What’s the Use of Models?

Agroscope, Climate and Air Pollution Group, Agroecology and Environment Department, Reckenholzstr. 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
Oeschger Center for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
Received: 10 September 2017 / Revised: 6 October 2017 / Accepted: 8 October 2017 / Published: 11 October 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [251 KB, uploaded 11 October 2017]   |  


Climate change poses a challenge to agricultural production and its impacts vary depending on regional focus and on the type of production system. To avoid production losses and make use of emerging potentials, adaptations in agricultural management will inevitably be required. Adaptation responses can broadly be distinguished into (1) short-term incremental responses that farmers often choose autonomously in response to observed changes and based on local knowledge and experiences, and (2) long-term transformative responses that require strategic planning, and which are usually implemented at a larger spatial scale. Models can be used to support decision making at both response levels; thereby, different features of models prove more or less valuable depending on the type of adaptation response. This paper presents a systematic literature review on the state-of-the-art in modelling for adaptation planning in agricultural production systems, investigating the question of which model types can be distinguished and how these types differ in the way they support decision making in agricultural adaptation planning. Five types of models are distinguished: (1) empirical crop models; (2) regional suitability models; (3) biophysical models; (4) meta-models; and (5) decision models. The potential and limitations of these model types for providing decision-support to short- and long-term adaptation planning are discussed. The risk of maladaptation—adaptation that implies negative consequences either in the long term or in a wider context—is identified as a key challenge of adaptation planning that needs more attention. Maladaptation is not only a risk of decision making in the face of incomplete knowledge of future climate impacts on the agricultural production system; but it can also be a threat if the connectedness of the agroecosystem is not sufficiently acknowledged when management adaptations are implemented. Future research supporting climate change adaptation efforts should thus be based on integrated assessments of risk and vulnerabilities (considering climate variability and uncertainty). To secure adaptation success in the long term, frameworks for monitoring management adaptations and their consequences should be institutionalised. View Full-Text
Keywords: agricultural modelling; decision-support; adaptation planning; maladaptation risk agricultural modelling; decision-support; adaptation planning; maladaptation risk

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Holzkämper, A. Adapting Agricultural Production Systems to Climate Change—What’s the Use of Models? Agriculture 2017, 7, 86.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Agriculture EISSN 2077-0472 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top