Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Photosynthesis and Yellow Vine Syndrome of American Cranberry
Previous Article in Journal
Earthworm Populations in Savannas of the Orinoco Basin. A Review of Studies in Long-Term Agricultural-Managed and Protected Ecosystems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 2
Issue 2
10.3390/agriculture2020109
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of Biofungicides for Controlling Plant Diseases to Improve Food Availability

by
Antonieta De Cal
1,
Inmaculada Larena
1,
Belén Guijarro
2 and
Paloma Melgarejo
1,*
1
Department of Plant Protection, INIA, Carretera de La Coruña km 7. 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Botany, Biological Sciences 2, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2012, 2(2), 109-124; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2020109
Submission received: 29 March 2012 / Revised: 7 May 2012 / Accepted: 11 May 2012 / Published: 21 May 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Plant Disease on Food Security)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biological control of fungal plant pathogens can improve global food availability, one of the three pillars of food security, by reducing crop losses, particularly for low-income farmers. However, the interrelationships of many environmental variables can result in multiple interactions among the organisms and their environment, several of which might contribute to effective biological control. Here, we present an advanced survey of the nature and practice of biological control when it is used to control brown rot in stone fruit. Specifically, we describe the population dynamics of Penicillium frequentans and Epicoccum nigrum and their efficacy as biocontrol agents against brown rot disease under field conditions. The size of P. frequentans population after an application of a P. frequentans conidial formulation during the crop season is bigger than that of E. nigrum following the application of an E. nigrum conidial formulation. Moreover, applications of a P. frequentans conidial formulation during the crop season also caused a higher reduction in the number of Monilinia spp. conidia on the fruit surface than that found after applications of an E. nigrum formulation during the growing season.

1. Introduction

Plant diseases need to be controlled in order to maintain global food availability, one of the three pillars of food security, and different approaches can be used to prevent, mitigate, or control plant diseases. In addition to good agronomic and horticultural practices, growers can apply chemical fertilizers and pesticides to their crops, and such applications have contributed significantly to spectacular improvements in food security. Finding non-chemical strategies for controlling crop diseases is of considerable interest because of environmental and health concerns about the widespread use of synthetic pesticides [1]. Nowadays, strict regulations on chemical pesticide use exist, and the political pressure to remove the most hazardous chemicals from the market is increasing. Therefore, the use of synthetic pesticides will probably be progressively reduced in the future, and this reduction will be accompanied by an increased reliance on the use of microorganisms as antagonists of plant pathogens [1]. However, controlling the wide spectrum of pathogens using microorganisms still remains an unfulfilled goal in commercial agriculture.
The main shortcoming of microbiological control is its lack of reliability, and several reasons can account for this limitation. Firstly, the population dynamics of the biological antagonist, the diversity of the natural population of the pathogen, and the natural climatic conditions are much more variable than those that are used in the laboratory to study the modes of actions of a biological control agent (BCA). Secondly, the climatic conditions that most favor the development of the pathogen might not be the same as the conditions that are required for the maximum expression of a BCA’s antagonistic activities [2]. Therefore, much more research should be devoted to identifying the environmental conditions that are required for the expression of a BCA’s beneficial effects under field conditions in order to make microbiological control more reliable.
Brown rot caused by Monilinia spp. is an economically important fungal disease of stone fruit, and is responsible for substantial pre- and postharvest losses [3]. Brown rot can be caused by the three Monilinia spp., namely M. laxa, M. fructicola, and M. fructigena [3]. Preharvest rains, the accumulation of excess moisture on fruit, wind, and the movement of insect vectors usually increase the incidence of brown rot [4]. Pre- and postharvest application of fungicides and insecticides to the fruit at proper intervals, the careful handling of harvested fruit in order to avoid wounding, proper pre- and postharvest sanitation, the rapid cooling of the harvested fruit and its storage at 0°C are all currently-used methods for decreasing brown rot incidence [5,6,7]. Despite the use of these disease control methods, brown rot at postharvest can still occur and cause significant crop losses [7,8,9]. Direct yield losses result from the infection of flowers (flower and twig blight), and from fruit rot at the preharvest, harvest, and postharvest stages [10]. Although the fruit can be infected with Monilinia spp. at any stage of its development, the disease only becomes severe when the fruit begins to ripen [11,12,13]. Susceptibility of peach fruit to M. laxa infection is usually greatest between the 32nd and 34th week of growth when the endocarp and pericarp are completely formed [13]. Postharvest losses are typically more severe than preharvest losses [10], and routinely occur during the fruit’s storage and transport [8]. Furthermore, development of pathogen resistance to synthetic pesticides [14,15,16,17,18], strong public opinion against the use of synthetic fungicides and insecticides, and the health risks that are associated with their application have made non-agrochemical products undesirable for controlling brown rot disease [19,20].
Epicoccum nigrum Link and Penicillium frequentans Westling are two common constituents of the resident mycobiota of peach twigs and flowers [21]. These two fungi have been shown to reduce twig blight caused by M. laxa in experimental stone fruit orchards [22,23,24] and postharvest brown rot caused by M. laxa and M. fructigena in laboratory assays [25,26,27]. Competition and antibiosis are the mode of action of these two fungal antagonists [24,28,29]. The major impediment in the commercialization of biocontrol products is the development of a formulation that will retain the same efficacy that is observed in laboratory assays in commercial orchards [30]. E. nigrum and P. frequentans have shown good potential for development as a commercial BCA against the brown rot of peach fruit [25,27,31]. Despite taking precautions to enhance BCA survival, severe environmental conditions may drastically limit a BCA’s ability to establish itself at its target site on the host [32]. Understanding the underlying ecological mechanisms of disease control and the population dynamics of a BCA in the environment is required when a BCA is proposed as a replacement for the existing methods of disease control [33]. Hence, the effect of inoculum type, the application frequency, and the time of application need to be zealously studied in order to ensure the efficacy of biological control [34,35].
Therefore, this article is an advanced survey of the nature and practice of biological control when it is used to control brown rot in stone fruit. This review will (i) describe the population dynamics of Penicillium frequentans and Epicoccum nigrum and their efficacy as BCAs against brown rot disease under field conditions, (ii) explore the relationships between antagonistic populations and biological control, and (iii) briefly outline future directions that might lead to the development of more diverse and effective BCAs.

2. Results and Discussion

P. frequentans and E. nigrum are effective biofungicides because they can reduce the number of Monilinia spp. conidia on fruit surfaces. The number of Monilinia spp. conidia on peach and nectarine fruit surfaces that were treated with either an E. nigrum or P. frequentans conidial formulation, as measured by the area under the conidial number of Monilinia spp. progress curve (AUncMOPC) are significantly lower (p= 0.05) than that found on untreated fruit surfaces (Table 1 and Table 2). A positive relationship between the conidial numbers of Monilinia spp. on peach surfaces and the incidence of latent infection has been reported [36], and these latent infections are also related to the incidence of postharvest brown rot [12]. The number of Monilinia spp. conidia on non-treated nectarine and peach surfaces increases from flowering to harvest. The numbers of Monilinia spp. conidia on fruit surfaces also increase rapidly during the pit hardening stage and during the month immediately before harvest, and the levels can be as high as 103.4–104.5 conidia per fruit surface. The highest levels of Monilinia spp. conidia on the fruit surface are usually found at harvest. The smallest Monilinia spp. conidial population was recorded on peach and nectarine fruit surfaces that were treated with a P. frequentans conidial formulation, followed by treatment with an E. nigrum conidial formulation and a fungicide (Table 1 and Table 2). In a previous study, we showed that an application of fresh E. nigrum or P. frequentans conidia at bloom and at preharvest reduced the incidence of postharvest brown rot in commercial peach orchards [31,37]. It has also been reported that preharvest application of other fungal BCAs, such as Metschnikowia fructicola, can also reduce the incidence of postharvest rot infections in stored strawberries [38]. Smilanick et al. [39] reported that preharvest infection of nectarines and peaches by Monilinia spp. could be the reason for poor control of brown rot when BCAs against this disease are applied postharvest.
Table
Table 1. Effect of the Epicoccum nigrum (FOR7) and Penicillium frequentans (FOR8) conidial formulations on the area under progress curve for the number of Monilinia spp. conidia (AUncMOPC) and the number of E. nigrum or P. frequentans conidia (AUncPC), and the area under progress curve for the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of E. nigrum or P. frequentans (AUcfuPC) for the surfaces of “Red September” peaches from a commercial orchard in Alfarrás, Spain in 2004 and 2005.
Table 1. Effect of the Epicoccum nigrum (FOR7) and Penicillium frequentans (FOR8) conidial formulations on the area under progress curve for the number of Monilinia spp. conidia (AUncMOPC) and the number of E. nigrum or P. frequentans conidia (AUncPC), and the area under progress curve for the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of E. nigrum or P. frequentans (AUcfuPC) for the surfaces of “Red September” peaches from a commercial orchard in Alfarrás, Spain in 2004 and 2005.
YearFormulationAUncMOPCAUncPCAUcfuPC
2004FOR7149,902 b3.59 × 106 a43,873 a
FOR870,801 c1.55 × 107 b168,521 b
cyproconazole241,333 b--
control837,524 a--
2005FOR7479,941 b1.37 × 107 b152,798 b
FOR849,326 c1.39 × 107 b83,866 a
tebuconazole408,852 b--
control565,004 a--
MSE1.96 × 10111.80 × 10134.19 × 109
*Data are the mean of four replicates. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance. Means followed by the same letter in each column were not significantly different according to the Student–Newman–Keuls multiple range test (p=0.05). MSE, mean squared error.
Table
Table 2. Effect of the Epicoccum nigrum (FOR7) and Penicillium frequentans (FOR8) conidial formulations on the area under progress curve for the number of conidia of Monilinia spp. (AUncMOPC) and the number of E. nigrum or P. frequentans conidia (AUncPC), and the area under progress curve for the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of E. nigrum or P. frequentans (AUcfuPC) for the surfaces of “Autumn Free” nectarines from a commercial orchard in Sudanell, Spain in 2004 and 2005.
Table 2. Effect of the Epicoccum nigrum (FOR7) and Penicillium frequentans (FOR8) conidial formulations on the area under progress curve for the number of conidia of Monilinia spp. (AUncMOPC) and the number of E. nigrum or P. frequentans conidia (AUncPC), and the area under progress curve for the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of E. nigrum or P. frequentans (AUcfuPC) for the surfaces of “Autumn Free” nectarines from a commercial orchard in Sudanell, Spain in 2004 and 2005.
YearFormulationAUncMOPCAUncPCAUcfuPC
2004FOR72,663,570 a4.29 × 106 a33,753 a
FOR8621,875 b2.54 × 107 b644,628 c
cyproconazole2,559,080 a--
control3,121,590 a--
2005FOR7356,349 b8.27 × 106 a43,995 a
FOR859,868 c1.92 × 107 b138,062 b
tebuconazole308,256 b--
control419,585 b--
MSE1.56 × 10141.71 × 10141.31 × 1010
*Data are the mean of four replicates. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance. Means followed by the same letter in each column were not significantly different according to the Student–Newman–Keuls multiple range test (p=0.05). MSE, mean squared error.
One of the goals of a population dynamics study is to identify recurring patterns in the dynamics of the population, and to acquire knowledge on the mechanisms that generate these patterns [40]. The population dynamics of E. nigrum and P. frequentans in two commercial orchards in 2004 and 2005 are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. We found that the number of conidia (AUncPC) and the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) (AUcfuPC) for peach and nectarines trees that were treated with a P. frequentans conidial formulation were significantly higher (p = 0.05) than those for those trees that were treated with an E. nigrum conidial formulation (Table 1 and Table 2). In all instances, the number of E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia on the peach surfaces (flowers or fruit) at each sampling date in every orchard was 100- to 1000-fold higher than the number of CFUs on Petri dishes that contained potato dextrose agar (PDA). Significantly larger E. nigrum and P. frequentans populations (p= 0.05) were present on the fruit surfaces 15 days before harvest (15–30% for the conidial populations and 80–100% for the number of CFUs) than on the flower surfaces in the early spring (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The number of E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia remained fairly constant on the fruit surfaces over the period from petal fall to the first preharvest treatment with the conidial formulations (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Although the conidial concentration in the E. nigrum or P. frequentans formulations that were applied to the peach trees were the same, the size of the P. frequentans population on the surfaces was higher than that of the E. nigrum population.
Effective colonization, a large population size, and the viability of a BCA on plant surfaces are all essential for successful biocontrol of plant diseases [41]. We found that the numbers of E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia are always significantly higher (p = 0.05) immediately following application of their conidial formulations when compared with those found at other sampling times (Figure 1 and Figure 2). It is possible that the greater number of P. frequentans conidia on the fruit surfaces may be due to a better adhesive ability than E. nigrum conidia, despite the ten-fold larger size of E. nigrum conidia [42]. In addition, the cell wall of E. nigrum conidia is composed of two layers whose outer layer is thick, studded with wart-like knobs, and pigmented by indole melanin [42].
The dynamics of individual populations within the epiphytic community are determined by the rates of immigration, emigration, growth, and death. Each of these factors is strongly influenced by the physical environment, chemical treatment, mean air temperature (tm), the relative humidity (RH), the amount of wind and rainfall, and solar radiation [40]. Hence, any climatic change, such as an increase in environmental temperature or drought stress, has the potential to affect a BCA’s performance and impact a food security agenda. Since fresh conidia without additives are more susceptible to environmental stress than dried conidial formulations, improving inoculum quality in such a manner as to reduce its susceptibility to environmental stresses is one way to increase the preharvest efficacy of BCAs [43]. We found that the sizes of the two BCA populations on the surface of peaches that were treated by either the FOR7 or FOR8 conidial formulation are much higher than those on the surfaces of peaches that were treated with fresh conidia without any additives [27,31]. We also found that the size of E. nigrum indigenous population was also lower than that of P. frequentans. Furthermore, application of both biological formulations always increased the size of the indigenous population of the fungi by 100- to 1000-fold on peach surfaces during the crop season in all tested orchards.
Agriculture 02 00109 g001 1024
Figure 1. Population dynamics of Epicoccum nigrum (EPI) after five or six applications of the FOR7 E. nigrum conidial formulation. The data are displayed as the logarithm of the number of conidia and the number of colony-forming units (CFU + 1) that were recovered from flowers or fruit in (A) 2004 and (B) 2005 in a commercial orchard in Alfarrás, Spain, and in (C) 2004 and (D) 2005 in a commercial orchard in Sudanell, Spain. The number of E. nigrum conidia was counted in a hemocytometer under a light microscope (×100). The numbers of CFUs of E. nigrum per square centimeter of surface of the Petri dish that contained potato dextrose agar that was supplemented with 0.5 g L−1streptomycin were counted with the naked eye. Data are the mean of four replicates, with 10 flowers or five fruits per replicate. The vertical arrows show the times of the EPI applications.
Figure 1. Population dynamics of Epicoccum nigrum (EPI) after five or six applications of the FOR7 E. nigrum conidial formulation. The data are displayed as the logarithm of the number of conidia and the number of colony-forming units (CFU + 1) that were recovered from flowers or fruit in (A) 2004 and (B) 2005 in a commercial orchard in Alfarrás, Spain, and in (C) 2004 and (D) 2005 in a commercial orchard in Sudanell, Spain. The number of E. nigrum conidia was counted in a hemocytometer under a light microscope (×100). The numbers of CFUs of E. nigrum per square centimeter of surface of the Petri dish that contained potato dextrose agar that was supplemented with 0.5 g L−1streptomycin were counted with the naked eye. Data are the mean of four replicates, with 10 flowers or five fruits per replicate. The vertical arrows show the times of the EPI applications.
Agriculture 02 00109 g001
Agriculture 02 00109 g002 1024
Figure 2. Population dynamics of Penicillium frequentans (Pf) after five or eight applications the FOR8 P. frequentans conidial formulation. The data are displayed as the logarithm of the number of conidia and the number of colony-forming units (CFU + 1) that were recovered from flowers or fruit in 2004 (A) and 2005 (B) in a commercial orchard in Alfarrás, Spain, and in 2004 (C) and 2005 (D) from a commercial orchard in Sudanell, Spain. The numbers of P. frequentans conidia were counted in a hemocytometer under a light microscope (×100). The number of CFUs of P. frequentans per square centimeter of surface of the Petri dish containing potato dextrose agar that was supplemented with 0.5 g L−1 streptomycin was counted with the naked eye. Data are the mean of four replicates, with 10 flowers or five fruits per replicate. The vertical arrows show the times of the Pf applications.
Figure 2. Population dynamics of Penicillium frequentans (Pf) after five or eight applications the FOR8 P. frequentans conidial formulation. The data are displayed as the logarithm of the number of conidia and the number of colony-forming units (CFU + 1) that were recovered from flowers or fruit in 2004 (A) and 2005 (B) in a commercial orchard in Alfarrás, Spain, and in 2004 (C) and 2005 (D) from a commercial orchard in Sudanell, Spain. The numbers of P. frequentans conidia were counted in a hemocytometer under a light microscope (×100). The number of CFUs of P. frequentans per square centimeter of surface of the Petri dish containing potato dextrose agar that was supplemented with 0.5 g L−1 streptomycin was counted with the naked eye. Data are the mean of four replicates, with 10 flowers or five fruits per replicate. The vertical arrows show the times of the Pf applications.
Agriculture 02 00109 g002
A principal component analysis (PCA) was undertaken to extract the linear composites of the number of Monilinia spp., E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia on the nectarine and peach surfaces, the number of applications, the year of application, the formulation type, the tm, and the RH (Figure 3). According to the results of the PCA, we found that only the first three components had eigenvalues greater than one, and when combined, components 1, 2, and 3 accounted for 77.6% of the total variance, 41.3%, 23.5%, and 12.9%, respectively. The variance in the number of Monilinia spp. on fruit surface is mainly dependent on the number of E. nigrum and P. frequentans, the formulation type, and the RH (Figure 4). All were on the negative side of the first principal component axis, while the number of applications, the year of application, and the tm were on the positive side (Figure 4). The AUncMOPC and climatic conditions were on the negative side of the second principal component (Figure 4). On other hand, the AUncMOPC, the AUcfuPC, the RH, and the formulation type were closely grouped on the positive side of the third principal component axis (Figure 4). Shaw et al. [44] reported that the severity of a fungal disease in fruit is a function of temperature and wetness duration under controlled conditions. De Cal et al. [45] studied the population dynamics of E. nigrum on peaches and nectarines in order to find a method for promoting its colonization on fruit surfaces and improve its biocontrol efficacy against brown rot. They reported that the number of pit hardening and preharvest applications of the E. nigrum conidial formulations and RH accounted for 96% of the variability in the viability of the E. nigrum conidial population on the peach surfaces. In another study, Guijarro et al. [46] studied the population dynamics of P. frequentans on peach flower and fruit surfaces after different field treatments of six different P. frequentans conidia formulations. They found that size the P. frequentans conidial population on the surfaces was dependent upon application of the formulation to the blooming flowers and pre-harvested fruit, the RH, and the tm.
Agriculture 02 00109 g003 1024
Figure 3. Daily rainfall (mm), mean temperature (tm ºC) and relative humidity (% RH) during (A) 2004 and (B) 2005 in the commercial orchard in Alfarrás, Spain, and (C) 2004 and (D) 2005 in the commercial orchard in Sudanell, Spain.
Figure 3. Daily rainfall (mm), mean temperature (tm ºC) and relative humidity (% RH) during (A) 2004 and (B) 2005 in the commercial orchard in Alfarrás, Spain, and (C) 2004 and (D) 2005 in the commercial orchard in Sudanell, Spain.
Agriculture 02 00109 g003
Agriculture 02 00109 g004 1024
Figure 4. Principal component analysis to the number of Monilinia spp. (AUncMOPC), the number of E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia and cfu (AUncPC and AUcfuPC) on nectarine and peach surfaces, the number of applications, the year of application, the formulation type, the mean temperature (tm), and the relative humidity (RH). The first three components accounted for 41.3%, 23.5%, and 12.9% of the total variance, respectively.
Figure 4. Principal component analysis to the number of Monilinia spp. (AUncMOPC), the number of E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia and cfu (AUncPC and AUcfuPC) on nectarine and peach surfaces, the number of applications, the year of application, the formulation type, the mean temperature (tm), and the relative humidity (RH). The first three components accounted for 41.3%, 23.5%, and 12.9% of the total variance, respectively.
Agriculture 02 00109 g004
Preharvest application and optimization of BCAs require considerable understanding of the crop system, the pathogen’s epidemiology, and the biology, ecology, and population dynamics of the antagonists and their interactions [47]. The results of our studies suggest that the size of P. frequentans population after an application of a P. frequentans conidial formulation during the crop season is larger than that of E. nigrum following the application of an E. nigrum conidial formulation. Moreover, applications of a P. frequentans conidial formulation during the crop season also caused a greater reduction in the number of Monilinia spp. conidia on the fruit surface than that found after applications of an E. nigrum formulation during the growing season.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Cultures and Formulations

Conidia of E. nigrum (ATCC No 96794) and P. frequentans (ATCC No 66108) were produced in a solid fermentation system [48,49]. For production of the FOR7 E. nigrum conidial formulation, fresh E. nigrum conidia were suspended after centrifugation in a 1% KCl + 1.25% sodium alginate solution in 250 mL centrifuge tubes. The tubes were shaken on a vortex mixer (Reax Top, Heildolph, Rose Scientific Ltd. Alberta, Canada) for 10 seconds and kept for 10 min. at room temperature (20–25°C). For production of the FOR8 P. frequentans conidial formulation, fresh P. frequentans conidia were suspended in 2% methyl cellulose +10% glucose solution in 250 mL centrifuge tubes, which were then processed in the identical manner as described above. Each conidial suspension was filtered through 2µm filter paper in a Büchner funnel, and the filtrate was then mixed with silica powder at a ratio that was necessary to obtain granulation [26,27]. The granules were dried in a fluid bed dryer (FBD model 350s, Burkard Manufacturing Co Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK) at its highest air flow rate at 40°C [25,50]. The moisture content of each final conidial formulation was measured using a humidity analyzer (BOECKEL, GmbH & Co, Hamburg, Germany). Germination of the dried conidia was assessed using a previously described bioassay [25,50]. Conidia were dried to reduce their moisture content to between 5% and 10% and their germinability was as high as 80% after drying [26,50].

3.2. Treatments and Experimental Design

Four field surveys were carried out in two commercial peach (Prunus persica “Red September”) and nectarine (Prunus persica var. nectarina (Aiton) Maxim “Autumn Free”) orchards which were located in Alfarrás (UTM: 298197, 4634045), and Sudanell (UTM: 297230, 4603615), Lleida, Cataluña, Spain over two growing seasons in 2004 and 2005. The size of the orchards ranged from 3–5 hectares. The planting distances between rows and trees ranged from 2–4 metres in the Alfarras orchard, and 4–5 metres in the Sudanell orchard. The experimental design of each experiment was a randomized complete block design in which four replications (four blocks) were used, and three trees comprised the sample unit for each treatment and replication. Three barrier trees were used to separate the blocks and the treatments in order to avoid inter plot interference and protect the untreated trees from the fungicidal sprays. Daily measurements of mean tm, rainfall (mm), and RH were collected by automated weather monitors, which were located 0.5–5 km from each orchard. The average daily tm, rainfall, and RH were calculated for each orchard and for each treatment period. The treatment periods were (a) day of first biocontrol treatment to one day before the second treatment; (b) day of second biocontrol treatment to one day before the third treatment; (c) day of third biocontrol treatment to one day before the fourth treatment, and (d) day of fourth biocontrol treatment to one day before the fifth treatment. The trees were treated 5–8 times with the FOR7 and FOR8 conidial formulations in each experiment during the growing season: once at the pink blossom stage, once at the shuck-split stage, 1–3 times at the pit hardening stage, and 1–3 times at preharvest. All treatments were applied using a backpack sprayer (operating pressure 10 bar, hollow cone nozzle 1 mm) in the morning. Standard crop protection practices were applied in the two commercial orchards during the surveys. No specific fungicide against Monilinia spp. was applied during the surveys, except when trees in the same orchard were treated with either an experimental conidial formulation or a fungicide. When applied, the specific fungicides were: Caddy Pepite 10 (cyproconazole 10% WG; Bayer Cropscience, S.L. Valencia, Spain) in 2004 (ALF04 and SUD04); and Folicur 25RW (tebuconazole 25% WG; Bayer Hispania Industrial, S.A., Barcelona, Spain) in 2005 (ALF05 and SUD05). All treatments were carefully applied in non-windy conditions.

3.3. Population Dynamics of E. nigrum and P. frequentans

In order to investigate the population dynamics of E. nigrum and P. frequentans following the application of each conidial formulation, 10 flowers or five fruits per sample unit (a sample unit corresponded to three trees and four replications for each treatment) were sampled in each orchard. The fruit and flower samples were taken at random different heights and locations in the canopy of each tree in a manner to ensure that the entire canopy of each tree was sampled. The sampling was undertaken 11 times in 2004 and 12 times in 2005. In the laboratory, each sample unit was suspended in containers that contained sterile distilled water (SDW) and shaken for 30 min. at 150 rev min−1 in a rotary shaker. Each suspension was then decanted to centrifuge tubes, which were then centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min. at 14,040g. The recovered pellet was resuspended in 5 mL SDW (concentrate). The population size of E. nigrum and P. frequentans in each suspension was estimated from (i) the number of conidia and (ii) the number of CFUs of E. nigrum and P. frequentans per flower or fruit. The numbers of E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia were counted in a hemocytometer under a light microscope (×100). The number of CFUs of E. nigrum and P. frequentans per Petri dish that contained PDA (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) which was supplemented with 0.5 g L−1 streptomycin was counted with the naked eye. Aliquots (100 µL) of 10- and 100-fold dilutions of each concentrate and each concentrate were spread onto the Petri dishes that contained the amended PDA. Three replicate dishes were used for each replicate, dilution, and concentrate. The Petri dishes were maintained at 20–25°C for 5–7 days in the dark before counting the number of CFUs [51]. The control for this assay was flowers and fruit from the Sudanell orchard which did not receive any treatment in 2005 (SUD05) and flowers and fruit from the Alfarrás orchard in 2005 (ALF05). Morphological characterization of E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia in the CFUs was used to confirm their identity.

3.4. Biocontrol Efficacy of E. nigrum and P. frequentans Conidial Formulations

In order to evaluate the effect of E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidial formulations on the number of Monilinia spp. conidia on peach surfaces, we used the same flower and fruit samples that were used to estimate the number of P. frequentans and E. nigrum on the flower or fruit samples.

3.5. Data Analysis

Progress curves for the conidial numbers of E. nigrum, P. frequentans, and Monilinia spp., and for CFUs of E. nigrum and P. frequentans for each treatment at the different sampling dates were generated for each orchard and year. The area under each progress curve for the number of E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia (AUncPC) or Monilinia spp. conidia (AUncMOPC), and the number of CFUs of E. nigrum and P. frequentans (AUcfuPC) for each orchard and year were calculated by trapezoidal integration on an Excel spreadsheet using the following formulae that are based on those used by Campbell and Madden [52]:
AUncPC = Σi=1n−1[(ti+1− ti)(NCi + NCi+1)/2]        (1)
AUncMONPC = Σi=1n−1[(ti+1− ti)(NCMOi + NCMOi+1)/2]        (2)
AUcfuPC = Σi=1n−1[(ti+1− ti)(CFUi + CFUi+1)/2]        (3)
where “t” is “days from full flowering to harvest”, “NC” or “NCMO” are “the number of conidia at each sampling date for E. nigrum and P. frequentans or Monilinia spp., respectively”, “CFU” is “the number of CFUs at each sampling date for E. nigrum and P. frequentans”, and “n” is “the number of sampling dates”.
Data of the AUncMOPC, and AUncPC and the AUcfuPC for each formulation and for each orchard were analyzed by a factorial analysis of variance [53]. When the F-test showed a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05, the treatment means were compared by Student–Newman–Keuls multiple range test (p = 0.05) [53].
The number of Monilinia spp., E. nigrum and P. frequentans conidia on nectarine and peach surfaces and climatic conditions from all experiments were analyzed by a principal component analysis [54] and only those components whose eigenvalues were greater or equal to 1.0 were extracted. The analysis was done with Statgraphics Centurion XVI v. 16.1.03 (StatPoint, Inc., Herndon, VA, USA).

4. Conclusions

Biological control of brown rot in stone fruit caused by Monilinia spp. is very dependent on BCA density on the flower or fruit surface and the RH. One way to improve the performance of a fungal BCA is to develop an efficacious conidial formulation. The size of P. frequentans population after an application of a P. frequentans conidial formulation during the crop season is bigger than that of E. nigrum following the application of an E. nigrum conidial formulation. Moreover, applications of a P. frequentans conidial formulation during the crop season also caused a greater reduction in the number of Monilinia spp. conidia on the fruit surface than that found after applications of an E. nigrum formulation during the growing season. Finally, the potency of the E. nigrum conidial formulation is the same as that of fungicide.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with financial support from AGL2002-4396-CO2 (Plan Nacional de I+D+I, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain), RTA2005-0077-CO2, and from RM2010-00013. The authors wish to thank Y. Herranz and M.T. Morales Clemente for their technical support. The authors also wish to thank Arieh Bomzon, Consulwrite (www.consulwrite.com) for his editorial assistance in preparing this review.

References

  1. Alabouvette, C.; Olivain, C.; Steinberg, C. Biological control of plant diseases: The European situation. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 114, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nicot, P.C.; Decognet, V.; Fruit, L.; Bardin, M.; Trottin, Y. Combined effect of microclimate and dose of application on the efficacy of biocontrol agents for the protection of pruning wounds on tomatoes against Botrytis cinerea. Bulletin IOBC/SROP 2002, 25, 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  3. Byrde, R.J.; Willetts, H.J. The Brown Rot Fungi of Fruit. Their Biology and Control., 1st ed; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1977; p. 171. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmadi, H.; Biasi, W.V.; Mitcham, E.J. Control of brown rot decay of nectarines with 15% carbon dioxide atmosphere. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1999, 124, 708–712. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sommer, N.F. Role of controlled environments in suppression of post-harvest diseases. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1985, 7, 331–339. [Google Scholar]
  6. Osorio, J.M.; Adaskaveg, J.E.; Ogawa, J.W. Comparative efficacy and systemic activity of iprodione and the experimental anilide E-0858 for control of brown rot on peach fruit. Plant Dis. 1993, 77, 1140–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hong, C.X.; Michailides, T.J.; Holtz, B.A. Effects of wounding, inoculum density, and biological control agents on postharvest brown rot of stone fruit. Plant Dis. 1998, 82, 1210–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ogawa, J.M.; Zehr, E.I.; Biggs, A.R. Brown rot. In Compendium of Stone Fruit Diseases; Ogawa, J.M., Zehr, E.I., Bird, G.W., Ritchie, D.F., Uriu, K., Uyemoto, J.K., Eds.; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1995; pp. 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hong, C.X.; Holtz, B.A.; Morgan, D.P.; Michailides, T.J. Significance of thinned fruit as a source of the secondary inoculum of Monilinia fructicola in California nectarine orchards. Plant Dis. 1997, 81, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Villarino, M.; Melgarejo, P.; Usall, J.; Segarra, J.; Lamarca, N.; De Cal, A. Secondary inoculum dynamics of Monilinia spp. and relationship to the incidence of postharvest brown rot in peaches and the weather conditions during the growing season. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, X.-M.; Bertone, C.; Berrie, A. Effects of wounding, fruit age and wetness duration on the development of cherry brown rot in the UK. Plant Pathol. 2007, 56, 114–119. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gell, I.; De Cal, A.; Torres, R.; Usall, J.; Melgarejo, P. Relationship between the incidence of latent infections caused by Monilinia spp. and the incidence of brown rot of peach fruit: Factors affecting latent infection. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 121, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Villarino, M.; Sandin-España, P.; Melgarejo, P.; De Cal, A. High chlorogenic and neochlorogenic acid levels in immature peach reduce Monilinia laxa infection by interfering with fungal melanin biosynthesis. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 3205–3213. [Google Scholar]
  14. Penrose, L.J.; Davis, K.C.; Koffmann, W. The distribution of benomyl-tolerant Slerotinia fructicola (Wint.) Rehm in stone fruit orchards in New South Wales and comparative studies with susceptible isolates. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1979, 30, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Penrose, L.J. Prolonged field persistence of resistance to benomyl in Monilinia fructicola. Crop Prot. 1990, 9, 190–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elmer, P.A.G.; Gaunt, R.E. Effect of frequency of dicarboximide applications on resistant populations of Monilinia fructicola and brown rot in New Zealand orchards. Crop Prot. 1993, 12, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Falconi, C.J.; Mendgen, K. Epiphytic fungi on apple leaves and their value for control of the postharvest pathogens Botrytis cinerea, Monilinia fructigena and Penicillium expansum. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 1994, 101, 38–47. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sanoamuang, N.; Gaunt, R.E. Persistence and fitness of carbendazim- and dicarboximide-resistant isolates of Monilinia fructicola (Wint.) Honey in flowers, shoots and fruit of stone fruit. Plant Pathol. 1995, 44, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Adaskaveg, J.E.; Förster, H.; Gubler, W.D.; Teviotdale, B.L.; Thompson, D.F. Reduced risk fungicides: A new way of managing brown rot and other fungal diseases of stone fruit crops. Cal. Agric. 2004, 59, 109–114. [Google Scholar]
  20. Malavolta, C.; Cross, J.V.; Cravedi, P.; Jörg, E. Guidelines for Integrated Production of Stone Fruits. In Technical Guideline III, IOBC wprs Bulletin; International Organization for Biological and integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palaearctic Regional Section: Dijon, France, 2003; Volume 26. [Google Scholar]
  21. Melgarejo, P.; Carrillo, R.; Sagasta, E.M. Mycoflora of peach twigs and flowers and its possible significance in biological control of Monilinia laxa. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1985, 85, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Melgarejo, P.; Carrillo, R.; Sagasta, E.M. Potential for biological control of Monilinia laxa in peach twigs. Crop Prot. 1986, 5, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Cal, A.; Sagasta, E.M.; Melgarejo, P. Biological control of peach twig blight (Monilinia laxa) with Penicillium frequentans. Plant Pathol. 1990, 39, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Madrigal, C.; Pascual, S.; Melgarejo, P. Biological control of peach twig blight (Monilinia laxa) with Epicoccum nigrum. Plant Pathol. 1994, 43, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guijarro, B.; Larena, I.; Melgarejo, P.; De Cal, A. Effect of drying on conidial viability of Penicillium frequentans, a biological control agent against peach brown rot disease caused by Monilinia spp. Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 2006, 16, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guijarro, B.; Melgarejo, P.; De Cal, A. Effect of stabilizers on the shelf-life of Penicillium frequentans conidia and their efficacy as a biological agent against peach brown rot. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 113, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Larena, I.; De Cal, A.; Melgarejo, P. Effects of stabilizers on shelf-life of Epicoccum nigrum formulations and their relationship with biocontrol of postharvest brown rot by Monilinia of peaches. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 102, 570–582. [Google Scholar]
  28. De Cal, A.; Sagasta, E.M.; Melgarejo, P. Antifungal substances produced by Penicillium frequentans and their relationship to the biocontrol of Monilinia laxa. Phytopathol. 1988, 78, 888–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Cal, A.; Melgarejo, P. Interactions of and mycoflora of peach twigs. Mycol. Res. 1992, 96, 1105–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Janisiewicz, W.J.; Jeffers, S.N. Efficacy of commercial formulation of two biofungicides for control of blue mold and gray mold of apples in cold storage. Crop Prot. 1997, 16, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guijarro, B.; Melgarejo, P.; De Cal, A. Effects of different biological formulations of Penicillium frequentans on brown rot of peaches. Biol. Control 2007, 42, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Burges, H.D.; Jones, K.A. Trends in formulation of microorganisms and future research requirements. In Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides, 1st; Burges, H.D., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 311–332. [Google Scholar]
  33. Collins, D.P.; Jacobsen, B.J.; Maxwell, B. Spatial and temporal population dynamics of a phyllosphere colonizing Bacillus subtilis biological control agent of sugar beet Cercospora leaf spot. Biol. Control 2003, 26, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jones, E.E.; Mead, A.; Whipps, J.M. Effect of inoculum type and timing of application of Coniothyrium minitans on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: Control of sclerotinia disease in glasshouse lettuce. Plant Pathol. 2004, 53, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jones, E.E.; Clarkson, J.P.; Mead, A.; Whipps, J.M. Effect of inoculum type and timing of application of Coniothyrium minitans on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: Influence on apothecial production. Plant Pathol. 2004, 53, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gell, I.; De Cal, A.; Torres, R.; Usall, J.; Melgarejo, P. Conidial density of Monilinia app. on peach fruit surfaces in relation to the incidences of latent infections and brown rot. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 123, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Larena, I.; Torres, R.; De Cal, A.; Liñán, M.; Melgarejo, P.; Domenichini, P.; Bellini, A.; Mandrin, J.F.; Lichou, J.; Ochoa de Eribe, X.; Usall, J. Biological control of post-harvest brown rot (Monilinia spp.) of peaches by field applications of Epicoccum nigrum. Biol. Control 2005, 32, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kurtzman, C.; Droby, S. Metschnikowia fructicola, a new ascosporic yeast with potential for biocontrol of postharvest fruit rots. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 24, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Smilanick, J.L.; Dennis-Arue, R.; Bosch, J.R.; Gonzales, A.R.; Henson, D.; Janisiewicz, W.J. Control postharvest rot of nectarines and peaches by Pseudomonas species. Crop Prot. 1993, 12, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kinkel, L.L. Microbial population dynamics on leaves. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1997, 35, 327–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cartwright, K.D.; Benson, D.M. Optimization of biological control of Rhizoctonia stem rot on poinsettia by Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pseudomonas cepacia. Plant Dis. 1995, 79, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Domsch, K.H.; Gams, W.; Anderson, T.H. Compendium of Soil Fungi, 1st ed; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980; p. 1264. [Google Scholar]
  43. Teixidó, N.; Viñas, I.; Usall, J.; Magan, N. Control of blue mold of apples by preharvest application of Candida sake grown in media with different water activity. Phytopathol. 1998, 88, 960–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shaw, D.A.; Adaskaveg, J.E.; Ogawa, J.M. Influence of wetness period and temperature on infection and development of shot-hole disease of almond caused by Wilsonomyces carpophilus. Phytopathol. 1990, 80, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. De Cal, A.; Larena, I.; Liñán, M.; Torres, R.; Lamarca, N.; Usall, J.; Domenichini, P.; Bellini, A.; Eribe, X.O.; Melgarejo, P. Population dynamics of Epicoccum nigrum, a biocontrol agent against brown rot in stone fruit. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 592–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guijarro, B.; Melgarejo, P.; Torres, R.; Lamarca, N.; Usall, J.; De Cal, A. Penicillium frequentans population dynamic on peach surfaces after its application against brown rot in orchards. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Andrews, J.H. Biological control in the phyllosphere. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1992, 30, 603–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De Cal, A.; Larena, I.; Guijarro, B.; Melgarejo, P. Mass production of conidia of Penicillium frequentans, a biocontrol agent against brown rot of stone fruits. Biocontrol Sc. Technol. 2002, 12, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Larena, I.; De Cal, A.; Melgarejo, P. Solid substrate production of Epicoccum nigrum conidia for biological control of brown rot on stone fruits. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Larena, I.; De Cal, A.; Liñán, M.; Melgarejo, P. Drying of Epicoccum nigrum conidia for obtaining a shelf-stable biological product against brown rot disease. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lacey, J.; Hill, S.T.; Edwards, M.A. Microorganisms in stored grains, their enumeration and significance. Trop. Stored Prod. Inf. 1980, 39, 19–33. [Google Scholar]
  52. Campbell, C.L.; Madden, L.V. Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology, 1st ed; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1990; p. 523. [Google Scholar]
  53. Snedecor, G.W.; Cochran, W.G. Statistical Methods, 7th ed; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  54. Madden, L.; Pennypacker, S.P. Principal Component analysis of tomato early blight epidemics. Phytopathol. Z. J. Phytopathol. 1979, 95, 364–369. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Cal, A.; Larena, I.; Guijarro, B.; Melgarejo, P. Use of Biofungicides for Controlling Plant Diseases to Improve Food Availability. Agriculture 2012, 2, 109-124. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2020109

AMA Style

De Cal A, Larena I, Guijarro B, Melgarejo P. Use of Biofungicides for Controlling Plant Diseases to Improve Food Availability. Agriculture. 2012; 2(2):109-124. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2020109

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Cal, Antonieta, Inmaculada Larena, Belén Guijarro, and Paloma Melgarejo. 2012. "Use of Biofungicides for Controlling Plant Diseases to Improve Food Availability" Agriculture 2, no. 2: 109-124. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2020109

APA Style

De Cal, A., Larena, I., Guijarro, B., & Melgarejo, P. (2012). Use of Biofungicides for Controlling Plant Diseases to Improve Food Availability. Agriculture, 2(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2020109

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop