Next Article in Journal
Construction of a High-Density Genetic Map and QTL Mapping Analysis for Yield, Tuber Shape, and Eye Number in Diploid Potato
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Synergistic Control Efficiency of Multi-Dimensional Best Management Practices Based on the HYPE Model for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollution in Rural Small Watersheds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of the Combined Use of Postbiotics and Oxalic Acid Against Varroa destructor Under Field Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Recent Advances in Bee Rearing and Production

by
Atanas Z. Atanasov
1,* and
Zlatko Puškadija
2,*
1
Department of Agricultural Machinery, Agrarian and Industrial Faculty, University of Ruse “Angel Kanchev”, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria
2
Department of Beekeeping and Zoology, Faculty of Agrobiotehnical Sciences, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(19), 2031; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192031
Submission received: 24 September 2025 / Accepted: 26 September 2025 / Published: 28 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Bee Rearing and Production)
The global decline of entomofauna in recent decades has posed serious threats to biodiversity, the resilience of terrestrial ecosystems, and food production [1]. Among all insects, the honeybee has long held a special place in human society, even predating the advent of agriculture [2], providing food and medicine [3,4]. Today, the economic value of pollination in food production is estimated at USD 235–577 trillion, and 71 of the 100 crops supplying 90% of the world’s food depend on honeybee pollination [5]. The loss of even a portion of bee populations can severely disrupt food production, a risk that grows as the human population rapidly increases. Alarmingly, incidents of bee mortality are becoming increasingly frequent, regionally and globally, a phenomenon commonly referred to as colony collapse disorder (CCD) [6]. The causes of CCD are numerous and interrelated, ranging from habitat loss, environmental pollution, invasive species, parasites, and viruses to intensive agricultural and beekeeping practices.
Over the past decades, scientists have sought to reduce bee mortality through environmental conservation, alternative agricultural practices, and innovative approaches to apiculture. Numerous projects have addressed habitat quality, forage availability, bee-friendly practices, selective breeding, pest and disease control, and climate change, all aiming to strengthen the resilience of honeybees and the apiculture sector as a whole. Simultaneously, new technologies, advanced breeding programs, and ecologically informed practices are transforming traditional beekeeping into a dynamic, data-driven, and environmentally conscious industry.
The integration of digital technologies into beekeeping has opened unprecedented opportunities. Smart hives equipped with IoT sensors enable the remote monitoring of colony health, brood development, and environmental conditions in real time [7,8,9]. Machine learning algorithms can predict swarming events, detect early signs of disease, and optimize honey harvests, while sensors can identify dangerous parasites such as Varroa destructor [10,11]. Beyond the hive, advanced imaging techniques using UAV-based RGB and NDVI imagery, processed through deep learning, allow for the mapping and identification of flowering plants, supporting optimal forage planning [12,13]. These innovations not only enhance productivity but also facilitate evidence-based interventions, reducing stress on colonies and promoting long-term bee health.
Controlling parasites and diseases remains a cornerstone of modern apiculture. Biogenic preparations, including essential oils, probiotics, microorganisms, and organic acids, provide effective alternatives to chemical treatments, especially when combined with sound beekeeping practices [14,15,16]. Strategies such as temporarily caging queen bees [17], RNA interference (RNAi) treatments targeting Varroa mites [18,19], and hive microbiome manipulation [20] exemplify emerging approaches that enhance colony health while minimizing chemical exposure.
Selective breeding and genomics are also reshaping the field, enabling the propagation of genetic traits linked to hygienic behavior, disease resistance, and high productivity [21,22,23]. Such programs strengthen colony survival and facilitate the adaptation of beekeeping to diverse ecological regions facing unique environmental pressures.
Sustainability and ecological responsibility are increasingly central to apiculture. Organic practices that reduce or eliminate synthetic chemicals are gaining popularity, reflecting consumer demand and environmental awareness [24]. Collaborative efforts between beekeepers and farmers promote bee-friendly agricultural landscapes rich in floral resources [25], though competition with wild pollinators must be considered [26]. By integrating ecological awareness into production models, beekeeping not only improves hive health but also contributes to broader biodiversity preservation.
Climate change adds a complex layer to these challenges. Altered phenology and the availability of nectar and pollen directly affect colonies’ abilities to accumulate sufficient food reserves, contributing to winter mortality and overall colony weakening. Protecting bee populations in this context requires harnessing technological progress, optimizing crop selection, breeding resilient bee strains, and implementing environmentally sustainable practices.
The future of beekeeping lies at the intersection of tradition, innovation, and ecological responsibility. Integrating smart technologies, sustainable management practices, and genetic improvements has the potential to significantly enhance bee health and productivity. Realizing these gains depends on ongoing collaboration among scientists, beekeepers, policymakers, and the public. By embracing both scientific progress and respect for natural ecosystems, we can secure a thriving future for bees—and, with them, the well-being of our planet. The studies presented in the Special Issue “Recent Advances in Bee Rearing and Production” represent a valuable contribution to this knowledge, guiding the next generation of sustainable apiculture.

Acknowledgments

We, the Guest Editors, would like to express our gratitude to all authors who submitted papers to the Special Issue of Agriculture entitled “Recent Advances in Bee Rearing and Production”, to the reviewers of these papers for their insightful feedback and thoughtful suggestions, and to the editorial staff of Agriculture. We express our gratitude for the administrative and technical support under the European Union—NextGenerationEU project, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, No. BG-RRP-2.013-0001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. van Lexmond, M.B.; Bonmatin, J.M.; Goulson, D.; Noome, D.A. Worldwide integrated assessment on systemic pesticides: Global collapse of the entomofauna: Exploring the role of systemic insecticides. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dams, L.R. Bees and Honey-Hunting Scenes in the Mesolithic Rock Art of Eastern Spain. Bee World 1978, 59, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jull, A.B.; Rodgers, A.; Walker, N. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008, 4, CD005083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ellis, H. Spoonfuls of Honey: A Complete Guide to Honey’s Flavours & Culinary Uses, with over 80 Recipes; Pavilion: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. UNEP. UNEP Emerging Issues: Global Honey Bee Colony Disorder and Other Threats to Insect Pollinators; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Nairobi, Kenya, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. van Engelsdorp, D.; Cox-Foster, D.; Frazier, M.; Ostiguy, N.; Hayes, J. Colony Collapse Disorder Preliminary Report. In Proceedings of the Mid-Atlantic Apiculture Research and Extension Consortium (MAAREC), CCD Working Group, State College, PA, USA, 5 January 2007; p. 22. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kviesis, A.; Komasilovs, V.; Ozols, N.; Zacepins, A. Bee colony remote monitoring based on IoT using ESP-NOW protocol. Peer J. Comput. Sci. 2023, 9, e1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Komasilova, O.; Zacepins, A.; Komasilovs, V.; Kviesis, A. The impact of meteorological factors on the honey bee colony weight dynamics. Rural Sustain. Res. 2025, 53, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Turyagyenda, A.; Katumba, A.; Akol, R.; Nsabagwa, M.; Mkiramweni, M.E. IoT and Machine Learning Techniques for Precision Beekeeping: A Review. AI 2025, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dimitrios, K.I.; Bellos, C.V.; Stefanou, K.A.; Stergios, G.S.; Andrikos, I.; Katsantas, T.; Kontogiannis, S. Performance Evaluation of Classification Algorithms to Detect Bee Swarming Events Using Sound. Signals 2022, 3, 807–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Szczurek, A.; Maciejewska, M.; Bąk, B.; Wilde, J.; Siuda, M. Semiconductor gas sensor as a detector of Varroa destructor infestation of honeybee colonies—Statistical evaluation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 162, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Atanasov, A.Z.; Evstatiev, B.I.; Vladut, V.N.; Biris, S.-S. A Novel Algorithm to Detect White Flowering Honey Trees in Mixed Forest Ecosystems Using UAV-Based RGB Imaging. AgriEngineering 2024, 6, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Atanasov, A.Z.; Evstatiev, B.I.; Atanasov, A.I.; Hristakov, I.S. Detection and Assessment of White Flowering Nectar Source Trees and Location of Bee Colonies in Rural and Suburban Environments Using Deep Learning. Diversity 2024, 16, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hýbl, M.; Bohatá, A.; Rádsetoulalová, I.; Kopecký, M.; Hoštičková, I.; Vaníčková, A.; Mráz, P. Evaluating the efficacy of 30 different essential oils against Varroa destructor and honey bee workers (Apis mellifera). Insects 2021, 12, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hristov, P.R.; Hristakov, I.S.; Atanasov, A.Z.; Zhelyazkov, P.A. Effectiveness of glycerin-oxalic acid strips and essential oils in controlling Varroa destructor in honeybee. Vet. Med. 2025, 70, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thurston, D.; Eccles, L.; Kempers, M.; Borges, D.; Ducsharm, K.; Ovinge, L.; Stotesbury, D.; Scarlett, R.; Kozak, P.; Petukhova, T.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of an Oxalic Acid and Glycerin Formulation for Varroa destructor Control in Honey Bee Colonies During Summer in a Northern Climate. Pathogens 2025, 14, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kovačić, M.; Uzunov, A.; Tlak Gajger, I.; Pietropaoli, M.; Soroker, V.; Adjlane, N.; Benko, V.; Charistos, L.; Dall’Olio, R.; Formato, G. Honey vs. Mite—A trade-off strategy by applying summer brood interruption for Varroa destructor control in the Mediterranean region. Insects 2023, 14, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. McGruddy, R.A.; Smeele, Z.E.; Manley, B.; Masucci, J.D.; Haywood, J.; Lester, P.J. RNA interference as a next-generation control method for suppressing varroa destructor reproduction in honey bee (Apis mellifera) hives. Pest Manag. Sci. 2024, 80, 4770–4778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bortolin, F.; Rigato, E.; Perandin, S.; Granato, A.; Zulian, L.; Millino, C.; Pacchioni, B.; Mutinelli, F.; Fusco, G. First evidence of the effectiveness of a field application of RNAi technology in reducing infestation of the mite Varroa destructor in the western honey bee (Apis mellifera). Parasites Vectors 2025, 18, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tlak Gajger, I.; Nejedli, S.; Cvetnić, L. Influence of Probiotic Feed Supplement on Nosema spp. Infection Level and the Gut Microbiota of Adult Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Microorganisms 2023, 11, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Büchler, R.; Kovačić, M.; Buchegger, M.; Puškadija, Z.; Hoppe, A.; Brascamp, E.W. Evaluation of Traits for the Selection of Apis Mellifera for Resistance against Varroa Destructor. Insects 2020, 11, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sprau, L.; Gessler, B.; Liebsch, M.; Traynor, K.; Rosenkranz, P.; Hasselmann, M. The selection traits of mite non-reproduction (MNR) and Varroa sensitive hygiene (VSH) show high variance in subsequent generations and require intensive time investment to evaluate. Apidologie 2024, 55, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alger Samantha, A.; Burnham, P.A.; Miller, M.S.; Amiri, E.; Jordan, C.; Wagoner, K. Unhealthy brood odor scores predict pathogen loads of several important honey bee diseases. Front. Bee Sci. 2025, 3, 1509871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Underwood, R.M.; Lawrence, B.L.; Turley, N.E.; Cambron-Kopco, L.D.; Kietzman, P.M.; Traver, B.E.; López-Uribe, M.M. A longitudinal experiment demonstrates that honey bee colonies managed organically are as healthy and productive as those managed conventionally. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 6072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Requier, F.; Odoux, J.-F.; Tamic, T.; Moreau, N.; Henry, M.; Decourtye, A.; Bretagnolle, V. Floral ResourcesUsed by Honey Bees in Agricultural Landscapes. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 2015, 96, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lample, L.M.; Gonella, G.; Decourtye, A.; Henry, M.; Barnaud, C. Competition between wild and honey bees: Floral resources as a common good providing multiple ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2023, 62, 101538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Atanasov, A.Z.; Puškadija, Z. Recent Advances in Bee Rearing and Production. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192031

AMA Style

Atanasov AZ, Puškadija Z. Recent Advances in Bee Rearing and Production. Agriculture. 2025; 15(19):2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Atanasov, Atanas Z., and Zlatko Puškadija. 2025. "Recent Advances in Bee Rearing and Production" Agriculture 15, no. 19: 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192031

APA Style

Atanasov, A. Z., & Puškadija, Z. (2025). Recent Advances in Bee Rearing and Production. Agriculture, 15(19), 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15192031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop