Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Willingness and Behavioral Consistency of Chinese Consumers to Purchase Tea via E-Commerce Platforms
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Theoretical Basis and Research Hypothesis
- (1)
- Consumer personal characteristics
- (2)
- Cultural perception
- (3)
- Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use
- (4)
- Online shopping preferences
- (5)
- Trust endorsement
2.2. Model Construction
2.3. Data Sources
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Statistical Analysis
3.2. Regression Results
- (1)
- Personal characteristics: The education level variable in Model 2 is significant at the 10% level, which means that for each level of education improvement, the probability of positive consistency between consumer willingness and behavior decreases by 4.6%. The age variable of online shopping in Model 1 is significant at the 5% level, which means that for every level of increase in online shopping age, the probability of negative consistency in consumer willingness and behavior decreases by 3.7%, while the probability of positive consistency increases by 4.1%. At a level of 5% familiarity with tea, there is a significant negative impact on the bias of consumers’ willingness and behavioral consistency in online tea shopping. This means that for each level of familiarity with tea knowledge, the probability of deviation between willingness and behavior decreases by 3.7%, while the probability of positive consistency increases by 2.8%. Chinese tea can be divided into six main tea categories: green tea; black tea; black tea; white tea; yellow tea; and oolong tea. As a result, there are many standard categories for evaluating the quality of tea, which poses a high cultural knowledge barrier for consumers. This may cause fear for consumers who lack tea knowledge or experience in online tea shopping, but it also creates strong knowledge confidence for consumers who have mastered judgment skills. With the increase in education level, online shopping age, and familiarity with tea knowledge, consumers will gradually form a firm knowledge confidence, believing that they have sufficient information processing and product quality identification abilities in the process of online tea shopping, and will be able to fully enjoy the convenience brought by online tea shopping behavior while also buying satisfactory tea products. Thus, experienced consumers are less likely to be disturbed by other influencing factors in the decision-making process of converting their purchase intention into purchase behavior, resulting in a higher probability of a positive alignment between their willingness and behavior.
- (2)
- Cultural perception: The cultural association variable in Model 1 is significant at the 10% level, which means that for every level of increase in consumer perception of cultural association, the probability of negative agreement between consumer willingness and behavior decreases by 5.7%, while the probability of deviation increases by 3.9%. The cultural experience variable in Model 2 is significant at the 10% level, which means that for every level of improvement in the tea online shopping process that consumers can feel, the probability of negative consistency between their willingness and behavior decreases by 6%, while the probability of being in a deviant state increases by 10.1%. This indicates that consumers attach great importance to the value of tea cultural attributes. The good cultural and shopping atmosphere created by tea merchants can arouse consumers’ curiosity about tea culture and their desire to purchase tea, but at the same time, high cultural value tea is often accompanied by high prices, which also suppresses consumers’ motivation to put their purchasing intentions into practice. Therefore, although the full display of tea culture on online platforms can only increase the proportion of people who are willing but have no purchasing behavior, it exacerbates the contradiction between consumers’ willingness and behavior.
- (3)
- Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use: The convenience variable in Model 1 is significant at the 5% level, which means that for every level of improvement in consumers’ perception of the convenience of online tea shopping, the probability of negative agreement between consumer willingness and behavior decreases by 4.4%, while the probability of positive agreement increases by 4.6%. The variable of product diversification in both Model 1 and Model 2 shows a significant negative bias towards the consistency of consumers’ willingness and behavior in online tea shopping. This means that for each level of satisfaction with product diversification on online shopping platforms, the probability of the deviation between consumer willingness and behavior decreases by 4.9%, while the probability of positive consistency increases by 6.8%. The information reliability variable in Model 1 is significant at the 5% level, which means that for every level of improvement in consumers’ perception of the reliability of information published by tea online stores, the probability of negative consistency between consumer willingness and behavior decreases by 5.3%. In real consumption scenarios, consumers need to wait for tea to be brewed for a long time in tea shops and cannot try as many tea products as possible within the limited shopping time. In addition, online platforms provide consumers with a great experience of one-stop shopping at home without leaving their homes, allowing them to quickly watch prerecorded display images or videos from merchants online. This approach can help consumers save time while also enabling them to choose tea products that they are satisfied with. Therefore, on the premise that consumers believe in the credibility of merchants, the more they believe that purchasing tea online can enjoy better convenience and product diversification, the more willing they will be to purchase tea online. Not only does it increase the proportion of people who have intention and actual purchasing behavior; it also reduces the probability of negative agreement between intention and behavior, while the probability of deviation and positive agreement increases.
- (4)
- Online shopping preferences: The online evaluation and service attitude variables in Model 2 are significantly negatively correlated with the deviation in the consistency of consumers’ willingness and behavior to purchase tea online. This means that for each level of improvement in consumers’ online evaluation of products and their attention to store service attitude and professionalism, the probability of deviation between consumers’ willingness and behavior will decrease by 3.6% and 5.2%, respectively. At the same time, the level of attention to online evaluations will correspondingly increase the probability of consistent occurrence of willingness and behavior by 6.8%. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that for consumers, online tea shopping is a pure online experience, and there is no way to directly observe the quality and price comparison of products. It is necessary to understand the product through interaction with others’ information. Therefore, paying attention to other consumers’ online comments on merchants and professional explanations from customer service can promote consistency in consumer willingness and behavior and reduce the probability of deviation.
- (5)
- Trust endorsement: The variable of award status in Model 1 is significant at the 5% level, which means that for each level of increase in consumer attention to whether tea products in online stores have won awards, the probability of negative consistency between consumer willingness and behavior decreases by 5.0%. Possible reasons include two aspects: First, the award status represents the product quality competitiveness of tea in the industry; the more consumers pay attention to the award status, the more they trust the quality assurance implied behind the award label. Second, as mentioned earlier, tea is a cultural product, and having famous cultural products or tea leaves can cause consumers to conduct impulsive consumption out of vanity, which is essentially the same. Therefore, increasing attention to the award-winning situation will reduce the probability of negative consensus among consumers who are unwilling to purchase tea online.
4. Conclusions and Discussion
5. Suggestions
6. Research Limitations and Prospects
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ho, C.T.; Lin, J.K.; Shahidi, F. Tea and Tea Products: Chemistry and Health-Promoting Properties; CRC Press: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Rothenberg, D.O.; Zhang, L. Mechanisms Underlying the Anti-Depressive Effects of Regular Tea Consumption. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Global Market Report. Sustainable Commodities Marketplace Series 2019. 2020. Available online: https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/ssi-global-market-report-tea.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2020).
- Hobbs, J.E. Food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 2020, 68, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.; Cao, A.D.; Chen, S.; Li, H. Effects of Risk Perception of Pests and Diseases on Tea Famers’ Green Control Techniques Adoption. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China Tea Marketing Association. China Tea E-Commerce Development Report 2020. 2022. Available online: https://www.ctma.com.cn/index/index/zybg/id/11/ (accessed on 11 August 2023).
- Guo, J.; Hao, H.C.; Wang, M.D.; Liu, Z. An empirical study on consumers’ willingness to buy agricultural products online and its influencing factors. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 336, 130403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robina-Ramírez, R.; Chamorro-Mera, A.; Moreno-Luna, L. Organic and online attributes for buying and selling agricultural products in the e-marketplace in Spain. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2020, 42, 100992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Liu, Z.; Meng, T.; Florkowski, W.J.; Mu, Y. Impact of Food Sustainability Labels on the Price of Rice in Online Sales. Foods 2022, 11, 3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cang, Y.M.; Wang, D.C. A comparative study on the online shopping willingness of fresh agricultural products between experienced consumers and potential consumers. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2020, 30, 100493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.; Wang, Z.; Sun, Z.; Ruan, J. Determinants of Buying Produce on Short-Video Platforms: The Impact of Social Network and Resource Endowment—Evidence from China. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.B.; Yan, Y.M.; Chen, S.J.; Luo, X. Understanding the Impact of Social Commerce Website Technical Features on Repurchase Intention: A Chinese Guanxi Perspective. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2017, 18, 225. [Google Scholar]
- Qing, P.; Huang, H.; Razzaq, A.; Tang, Y.; Tu, M. Impacts of sellers’ responses to online negative consumer reviews: Evidence from an agricultural product. Can. J. Agric. Econ. Rev. Can. D’agroeconomie 2018, 66, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morosan, C.; DeFranco, A. Disclosing personal information via hotel apps: A privacy calculus perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 47, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knuth, M.J.; Khachatryan, H.; Hall, C.R. How Consistent Are Consumers in Their Decisions? Investigation of Houseplant Purchasing. Behav. Sci. 2021, 11, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, M.; Zhao, C. Analysis of consumption intention and behavior of green agricultural products. China Rural. Econ. 2008, 5, 44–55. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, M.; Zhou, G.H.; Wei, W. Study of the Game Model of E-Commerce Information Sharing in an Agricultural Product Supply Chain based on fuzzy big data and LSGDM. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 172, 121017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, S.L.; Liu, X.D.; Lamrabet, A.; Liu, H.; Huang, Y. Green production information transparency and online purchase behavior: Evidence from green agricultural products in China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 985101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Li, Z.; Zheng, D. Analysis of Chinese consumers’ willingness and behavioral change to purchase Green agri-food product online. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0265887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Yin, Z.Q.; Ding, J.Q.; Xu, S.; Zhang, B.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, L. Key influencing factors of consumers’ vegetable e-commerce adoption willingness, behavior, and willingness-behavior consistency in Beijing, China. Br. Food J. 2020, 122, 3741–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Manag. Sci. 2000, 45, 186–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dowling, G.R.; Staelin, R. A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity. J. Consum. Res. 1994, 21, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olson, J.C. Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process: A Cognitive Model Andan Empirical Test. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Woodside, A.G. Consumer evaluations of competing brands: Perceptual versus predictive validity. Psychol. Mark. 2012, 29, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faruk, A.K. The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of-mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 50, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Guo, F.P.; Yu, F.M.; Liu, S. The Effects of Online Shopping Context Cues on Consumers’ Purchase Intention for Cross-Border E-Commerce Sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garin-Munoz, T.; Lopez, R.; Perez-Amaral, T.; Herguera, I.; Valarezo, A. Models for individual adoption of ecommerce, ebanking and egovernment in Spain. Telecommun. Policy 2019, 43, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, Y. The moderating effects of gender on e-commerce systems adoption factors: An empirical investigation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 1753–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valarezo, A.; Perez-Amaral, T.; Garin-Munoz, T.; García, I.H.; López, R. Drivers and barriers to cross-border e-commerce: Evidence from Spanish individual behavior. Telecommun. Policy 2018, 42, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stranieri, S.; Ricci, E.C.; Banterle, A. Convenience food with environmentally sustainable attributes: A consumer perspective. Appetite 2017, 116, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, J.S.; Do, V.B.; Kim, K.O.; Cho, M.S.; Suwonsichon, T.; Valentin, D. Understanding the effect of culture on food representations using word associations: The case of “rice” and “good rice”. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 31, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gębski, J.; Kosicka-Gębska, M.; Tul-Krzyszczuk, A. Wpływ Internetu na zachowania współczesnych konsumentów wobec żywno ści. Handel Wewnętrzny 2017, 63, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Bauer, H.H.; Falk, T.; Hammerschmidt, M. eTransQual: A transaction process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping. J. Bus. Res. 2006, 59, 866–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 982–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quan, S.W.; Yu, H.H.; Zeng, Y.C. Research on consumers’ preference for milk powder origin in China—A comparative analysis based on choice experiment and display preference data. Agric. Technol. Econ. 2017, 1, 52–66. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, R.F. Empirical analysis of consumer characteristics and purchasing behavior of special agricultural products a based on survey data of urban residents in Beijing, Zhengzhou and Shanghai. China Rural. Econ. 2014, 5, 51–61. [Google Scholar]
- Szakály, Z.; Soós, M.; Balsa-Budai, N.; Kovács, S.; Kontor, E. The Effect of an Evaluative Label on Consumer Perception of Cheeses in Hungary. Foods 2020, 9, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricci, E.C.; Banterle, A.; Stranieri, S. Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 148, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.Y.; Xia, Z.Y.; Luo, W.P. Deviation Analysis on Consumers’ Willingness and Behavior of Purchasing Agricultural Products with Geographical Indications Online. Agric. Technol. Econ. 2019, 473, 110–120. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, F.Q.; Jiang, A.Q. The Consumers’ Knowledge of Product, Knowledge Acquisition Channels and Consuming Behavior-Based on 1803 residents tea consumption survey data of Hangzhou. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2013, 255, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, G.Z.; Xu, Z.; Tang, W.Y. A Study on the Willingness to Pay for the Premium of Tea Geographical Indication: Taking Anhua Black Tea as an Example. Agric. Technol. Econ. 2017, 08, 110–116. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.D.; Liu, Y.H. Deviation analysis of farmers’ e-commerce sales intention and behavior: Based on survey data from counties in Jiangxi Province. J. Agric. For. Econ. Manag. 2021, 20, 316–325. [Google Scholar]
- González, E.M.; Meyer, J.H.; Toldos, M.P. What women want? How contextual product displays influence women’s online shopping behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 625–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dominici, A.; Boncinelli, F.; Gerini, F.; Marone, E. Determinants of online food purchasing: The impact of socio-demographic and situational factors. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 60, 102473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Q.J.; Chen, J.H.; Zhang, R.B.; Wang, H.H. What factors affect Chinese consumers’ online grocery shopping? Product attributes, e-vendor characteristics and consumer perceptions. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 2020, 12, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.F.; Deng, S.L.; Zhou, Y. The impact of reference effects on online purchase intention of agricultural products: The moderating role of consumers? food safety consciousness. Internet Res. 2017, 27, 233–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dimension | Items | Variable Description | Average | Standard Deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dependent variable | Consistency | Negative consistency, Deviation, Positive consistency | 1.21 | 0.85 | 0 | 2 |
Independent variable | ||||||
Personal characteristic | Gender | Female, Male | 1.36 | 0.48 | 1 | 5 |
Age | 20 and under, 21–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51 and above | 2.25 | 1.06 | 1 | 5 | |
Education | Elementary and below, Middle school, Polytechnic school or High school, Junior college or Bachelor’s Degree, Graduate student and above | 3.92 | 0.84 | 1 | 5 | |
Monthly average income | 2000 and below, 2001~4000, 4001~6000, 6001~8000, 8001 and above. | 2.26 | 1.35 | 1 | 5 | |
Online shopping age | 1 year and below, 1~3 years, 4~6 years, more than 6 years | 2.93 | 0.96 | 1 | 4 | |
Tea knowledge familiarity (multiple choice questions) | (1) Tea tree varieties; (2) Processing technology; (3) Health effects; (4) Cultural history; (5) Brewing method | 2.40 | 1.20 | 1 | 5 | |
Cultural perceptions | Cultural association | I can associate the tea culture of the tea I buy with the process of buying tea online | 3.37 | 1.12 | 1 | 5 |
Cultural experience | I can feel the tea culture connotation of the tea I purchased during the process of purchasing tea online | 2.86 | 0.98 | 1 | 5 | |
Perceived usefulness | Convenience | Buying tea online is easier and faster, saving time and effort | 3.77 | 1.00 | 1 | 5 |
Product diversification | More products to choose from when buying tea online | 3.79 | 1.06 | 1 | 5 | |
Perceived ease of use | Price transparency | Buy tea online for more transparent prices | 3.55 | 1.09 | 1 | 5 |
Credible information | The online information about the display of tea is true and reliable! | 3.09 | 0.99 | 1 | 5 | |
Online shopping preferences | price | I will compare the price difference between buying the same tea online and offline | 3.51 | 1.10 | 1 | 5 |
Quality | I will compare the difference in quality between the same tea purchased online and offline | 3.59 | 1.03 | 1 | 5 | |
Origin | I will be looking at whether a particular tea is from a historical source or not | 3.32 | 1.03 | 1 | 5 | |
Comment | I will be watching for tasting comments from other buyers in the store | 3.56 | 1.11 | 1 | 5 | |
Trand volume | I will be looking at the sales of this tea in the store | 3.62 | 1.03 | 1 | 5 | |
Business Services | I value the customer service shown in the tea shopping process Service attitude and professionalism | 3.65 | 1.01 | 1 | 5 | |
Trust endorsement | Certification labels | When I buy tea online, I will pay attention to whether the tea has obtained authorization Certification (organic, geo-protected, etc.) | 3.61 | 1.09 | 1 | 5 |
Brand image | When I buy tea online, I pay attention to the brand’s reputation in the industry | 3.73 | 1.02 | 1 | 5 | |
Awards | I would look at how many awards the tea has won | 3.05 | 1.07 | 1 | 5 |
Variant | Delineation Criteria | Sample Size | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
Willingness | No | 160 | 27.35% |
Yes | 425 | 72.65% | |
Behavior | No | 303 | 51.79% |
Yes | 282 | 48.21% | |
Gender | Female | 374 | 63.93% |
Male | 211 | 36.07% | |
Age | 20 years and under | 135 | 23.08% |
21–30 years old | 285 | 48.72% | |
31–40 years old | 77 | 13.16% | |
41–50 years | 62 | 10.60% | |
51–60 years | 26 | 4.44% | |
Education | Primary and below | 12 | 2.05% |
Junior high school | 21 | 3.59% | |
Polytechnic school or High school | 95 | 16.24% | |
Junior college or Bachelor’s Degree | 330 | 56.41% | |
Graduate students and above | 127 | 21.71% | |
Monthly average income | 2000 and below | 237 | 40.51% |
2001~4000 | 136 | 23.25% | |
4001~6000 | 93 | 15.90% | |
6001~8000 | 59 | 10.09% | |
More than 8000 | 60 | 10.26% | |
Online shopping age | 1 year and less | 53 | 9.06% |
1~3 years | 134 | 22.91% | |
4~6 years | 201 | 34.36% | |
More than 6 years | 197 | 33.68% | |
Tea knowledge familiarity | Not familiar | 153 | 26.15% |
A little familiar | 196 | 33.50% | |
General familiarity | 136 | 23.25% | |
Quite familiar | 50 | 8.55% | |
Very familiar | 50 | 8.55% |
Individual Consumer Characteristics | Proportion (%) | Average Value | Chi-Square | T-Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Negative Consistency | Deviation | Positive Consistency | |||||
Gender | Women | 24.06 | 25.94 | 50.00 | 1.26 | 45.417 *** | 68.477 *** |
Male | 33.18 | 20.80 | 46.02 | 1.13 | |||
Age | 20 years and under | 22.96 | 25.19 | 51.85 | 1.29 | 354.308 *** | 51.160 *** |
21–30 years old | 25.61 | 19.30 | 55.09 | 1.29 | |||
31–40 years old | 29.87 | 36.36 | 33.77 | 1.04 | |||
41–50 years | 40.32 | 27.42 | 32.26 | 0.92 | |||
51–60 years | 30.77 | 34.62 | 34.61 | 1.04 | |||
Education | Primary and below | 33.33 | 25.00 | 41.67 | 1.08 | 565.761 *** | 113.143 *** |
Junior high school | 42.86 | 14.29 | 42.85 | 1.00 | |||
Secondary and high school | 27.37 | 31.58 | 41.05 | 1.14 | |||
College and Bachelor’s Degree | 25.15 | 22.73 | 52.12 | 1.27 | |||
Graduate students and above | 29.92 | 25.20 | 44.88 | 1.15 | |||
Average income | 2000 and below | 21.94 | 23.63 | 54.43 | 1.32 | 187.607 *** | 40.527 *** |
2001~4000 | 31.62 | 23.53 | 44.85 | 1.13 | |||
4001~6000 | 31.18 | 27.96 | 40.86 | 1.10 | |||
6001~8000 | 33.90 | 23.73 | 42.37 | 1.08 | |||
More than 8001 | 26.67 | 25.00 | 48.33 | 1.22 | |||
Online shopping age | 1 year and less | 43.40 | 28.30 | 28.30 | 0.85 | 98.590 *** | 73.621 *** |
1~3 years | 32.09 | 20.15 | 47.76 | 1.16 | |||
4~6 years | 22.89 | 29.35 | 47.76 | 1.25 | |||
More than 6 years | 24.37 | 21.32 | 54.31 | 1.30 | |||
Tea knowledge familiarity | Not familiar | 31.37 | 29.41 | 39.22 | 1.08 | 144.239 *** | 48.189 *** |
A little familiar | 25.51 | 25.00 | 49.49 | 1.24 | |||
General familiarity | 25.74 | 25.00 | 49.26 | 1.24 | |||
Quite familiar | 22.00 | 18.00 | 60.00 | 1.38 | |||
Very familiar | 32.00 | 12.00 | 56.00 | 1.24 | |||
Full sample | 27.35 | 24.10 | 48.55 | 1.21 | - | - |
Variant | Items | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ratio | Standard Deviation | Ratio | Standard Deviation | ||
Personal characteristic | Gender | 0.114 | 0.237 | −0.306 | 0.251 |
Age | 0.225 * | 0.128 | 0.107 | 0.131 | |
Education | 0.210 | 0.146 | 0.262 * | 0.149 | |
Monthly average income | −0.018 | 0.095 | −0.073 | 0.097 | |
Online shopping age | −0.269 ** | 0.126 | −0.138 | 0.129 | |
Tea knowledge familiarity | −0.050 | 0.095 | −0.247 ** | 0.103 | |
Cultural perceived | Cultural association | −0.283 * | 0.158 | 0.119 | 0.160 |
Cultural Experience | −0.118 | 0.163 | 0.574 *** | 0.168 | |
Perceived usefulness | Convenience | −0.316 ** | 0.156 | −0.143 | 0.163 |
Product diversification | −0.280 * | 0.154 | −0.420 *** | 0.159 | |
Perceived ease of Use | Price transparency | −0.138 | 0.130 | −0.067 | 0.139 |
Credible information | −0.276 * | 0.147 | 0.078 | 0.155 | |
Online Shopping Preferences | Price | 0.015 | 0.150 | −0.061 | 0.151 |
Quality | 0.011 | 0.154 | 0.002 | 0.159 | |
Origin | −0.129 | 0.144 | 0.057 | 0.154 | |
Comment | −0.213 | 0.137 | −0.310 ** | 0.141 | |
Trand volume | 0.072 | 0.155 | 0.013 | 0.159 | |
Business Services | −0.009 | 0.152 | −0.326 ** | 0.156 | |
Trust endorsement | Certification labels | 0.238 | 0.151 | 0.075 | 0.157 |
Brand image | −0.143 | 0.167 | −0.064 | 0.168 | |
Awards | −0.275 ** | 0.130 | 0.045 | 0.138 | |
Observed value | 585 | ||||
Log-likelihood | −522.365 | ||||
LR chi2 | 184.59 | ||||
Prob > chi2 | 0.000 *** | ||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.1502 |
Items | Negative Consistency | Deviation | Positive Consistency | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Efficiency Value | Standard Deviation | Efficiency Value | Standard Deviation | Efficiency Value | Standard Deviation | |
Age | 0.031 | 0.019 | 0.002 | 0.018 | −0.033 | 0.022 |
Education | 0.018 | 0.022 | 0.028 | 0.021 | −0.046 * | 0.025 |
Online shopping age | −0.037 * | 0.019 | −0.004 | 0.018 | 0.041 * | 0.021 |
Tea knowledge familiarity | 0.008 | 0.015 | −0.037 ** | 0.015 | 0.028 * | 0.016 |
Cultural association | −0.057 ** | 0.024 | 0.039 * | 0.023 | 0.018 | 0.026 |
Cultural Experience | −0.060 ** | 0.024 | 0.101 *** | 0.023 | −0.041 | 0.027 |
Convenience | −0.044 * | 0.024 | −0.001 | 0.023 | 0.046 * | 0.026 |
Product diversification | −0.019 | 0.023 | −0.049 ** | 0.023 | 0.068 *** | 0.026 |
Reliable information | −0.053 ** | 0.023 | 0.032 | 0.023 | 0.021 | 0.024 |
Comment | −0.015 | 0.021 | −0.036 * | 0.020 | 0.051 ** | 0.023 |
Business services | 0.021 | 0.024 | −0.052 ** | 0.023 | 0.031 | 0.025 |
Awards | −0.050 ** | 0.020 | 0.026 | 0.020 | 0.024 | 0.022 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Xie, K.; Lin, D.; Zhu, W.; Ma, Y.; Qiu, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Z. Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Willingness and Behavioral Consistency of Chinese Consumers to Purchase Tea via E-Commerce Platforms. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1897. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101897
Xie K, Lin D, Zhu W, Ma Y, Qiu J, Chen Y, Chen Z. Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Willingness and Behavioral Consistency of Chinese Consumers to Purchase Tea via E-Commerce Platforms. Agriculture. 2023; 13(10):1897. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101897
Chicago/Turabian StyleXie, Kexiao, Dongkai Lin, Weihan Zhu, Yongqiang Ma, Jiaxiong Qiu, Youcheng Chen, and Zhidan Chen. 2023. "Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Willingness and Behavioral Consistency of Chinese Consumers to Purchase Tea via E-Commerce Platforms" Agriculture 13, no. 10: 1897. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101897
APA StyleXie, K., Lin, D., Zhu, W., Ma, Y., Qiu, J., Chen, Y., & Chen, Z. (2023). Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Willingness and Behavioral Consistency of Chinese Consumers to Purchase Tea via E-Commerce Platforms. Agriculture, 13(10), 1897. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101897