Next Article in Journal
Weather Conditions, Orchard Age and Nitrogen Fertilization Influences Yield and Quality of ‘Łutówka’ Sour Cherry Fruit
Next Article in Special Issue
QTL Mapping for Fiber Quality Based on Introgression Lines Population from G. hirsutum × G. tomentosum
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Supplemental Feeding on Body Condition Score and Reproductive Performance Dynamics in Botosani Karakul Sheep
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Industrial Organic Wastewater through Drip Irrigation to Reduce Chemical Fertilizer Input and Increase Use Efficiency by Promoting N and P Absorption of Cotton in Arid Areas

Agriculture 2022, 12(12), 2007; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122007
by Xianzhe Hao 1,2,3,†, Xiaojuan Shi 1,†, Aziz Khan 1, Nannan Li 1, Feng Shi 1, Junhong Li 1, Yu Tian 1, Peng Han 1, Jun Wang 2,3,* and Honghai Luo 1,*
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Agriculture 2022, 12(12), 2007; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122007
Submission received: 6 November 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cotton Cultivation and Physiology for Higher Productivity)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Research is relevant and interesting.

 

1. No research hypothesis is presented in the introduction;

2. I suggest checking the data of available phosphorus in the table No. 3;

3. In the figure No. 10  it is not explained what the different letters and vertical bars represent;

4. The quality of the figures  No. 1, 2 and 12  could be better.

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please check the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

As a result of the evaluation of the article, it is recommended to make the following corrections.

Line 23:  ( Ammonium nitrogen): should be write lower case

Line 24: ( Available potassium): should be write lower case

Line 33: ( ha-1) should be corrected

Figure 8 and Figure 9: There is no need to use a percent sign (%) inside the figure, the figure looks too complicated (%) should be removed from inside the figure

In the overall evaluation, the article can be accepted after minor revision.

There are typos in the article, my advice is that the author should read and correct it.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Line 76, use full form at first use, “nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and phosphorus”

Figure 2 quality very low

The decimal of value reported in all tables of the manuscript must be uniform as the value of the detection limit of the used method.

Line 159-160: use full form at first use,

Line 169 to 180: provide suitable reference for equations

Figure 4, 5, and 6, quality very low

Line 244 and 249 and 267: remove abbreviation, only use full form in the legend

Line 293 legend of table 5? Remove typo

Go through journal guideline prepare citation according to that,

Please correct all grammatical errors and typo.

Recheck all abbreviations

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop