Next Article in Journal
Systemic Treatment for Advanced and Metastatic Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors—A Sarcoma Reference Center Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Irisin in Liver Cirrhosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/jcm9103154
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Consideration of Migraines Among Risk Factors for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

by
Jong-Ho Kim
1,2,†,
Man-sup Lim
3,†,
Sang-Hwa Lee
4,
Young-Suk Kwon
1,2,
Jae Jun Lee
1,2 and
Jong-Hee Sohn
2,4,*
1
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University college of Medicine, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
2
Institute of New Frontier Research, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
3
Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
4
Department of Neurology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
First authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3154; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103154
Submission received: 5 August 2020 / Revised: 22 September 2020 / Accepted: 28 September 2020 / Published: 29 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The impact of migraine on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is controversial, and few studies have focused on their relationship. Thus, we investigated the impact of migraine, among other risk factors, on PONV in a large retrospective study. We analyzed 10 years of clinical data from the Smart Clinical Data Warehouse of Hallym University Medical Center. PONV was defined as nausea or vomiting within the first 24 h after surgery. Patients diagnosed by a neurologist and with a history of triptan use before surgery were enrolled into the migraine group. We enrolled 208,029 patients aged > 18 years who underwent general anesthesia (GA), among whom 19,786 developed PONV within 24 h after GA and 1982 had migraine. Before propensity score matching, the unadjusted and fully adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for PONV in subjects with versus without migraine were 1.52 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34–1.72; p < 0.001) and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.21–1.56; p < 0.001), respectively. The OR for PONV in patients with migraine was also high (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13–1.66; p = 0.001) after matching. Our findings suggest that migraine is a significant risk factor for PONV.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are the most frequent side effects of anesthesia [1]. PONV has been reported to occur in 10–30% of all surgical patients, and the rate is as high as 80% in high-risk patients [2]. Although PONV is almost always self-limiting and nonfatal, it can cause dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, suture tension and dehiscence, venous hypertension and bleeding, esophageal rupture, and life-threatening airway compromise [3,4]. Therefore, prophylaxis and management of PONV are crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
The first step for prophylaxis of PONV is identifying the risk factors and high-risk populations. Many anesthesia, surgery, and patient-related factors can increase PONV risk [5]. Of these risk factors, female gender, a history of PONV, being the first-degree relative of a PONV patient, being a nonsmoker, history of motion sickness, age < 50 years, lengthy surgery, and postoperative opioid use are well-established [5,6,7].
After surgery, postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) tract dysfunction is common, and is associated with increased patient suffering and cost of care [8]. The GI tract can become distended after anesthesia and surgery [9], and nausea or vomiting is likely to occur in situations where there is dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter, such as in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) [10,11]. Migraine is accompanied by nausea and vomiting, which is therefore one of the diagnostic criteria. Migraine is also associated with GI disorders, such as gastroparesis, GERD, and irritable bowel syndrome [12,13,14], and is often accompanied by various upper GI symptoms [15,16]. However, the impact of migraine on PONV is controversial, and few studies have focused on their relationship. Previous studies have reported that a history of migraine tends to influence postoperative nausea only [17,18]. Other studies showed that PONV is more frequent in patients with a migraine history [19,20]. However, these reports were limited by small sample sizes and observational and/or questionnaire-based designs, which carry a risk of recall bias. Thus, we investigated the impact of migraine, among other factors, on PONV in a large retrospective study using propensity score matching.

2. Methods

2.1. Subjects

We retrospectively analyzed big clinical data, i.e., data from the Smart Clinical Data Warehouse (Smart CDW) of Hallym University Medical Center (HUMC). The Smart CDW, based on the QlikView Elite Solution (Qlik, Lund, Sweden), is used at the five hospitals of the HUMC. It offers electronic medical record text data analysis and an integrated analysis of fixed data. We collected the clinical data of patients aged ≥ 18 years who had undergone surgery with general anesthesia (GA) at one of the five HUMC hospitals between January 2010 and October 2019. We excluded patients who were re-operated on within 24 h, were unconscious after surgery, underwent ventilator therapy after surgery, experienced nausea or vomiting before surgery, or had missing data in their medical records. This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University (IRB No. 2020-01-002)

2.2. Migraine, PONV, and Covariates

PONV was defined as nausea or vomiting within the first 24 h after surgery. Patients with migraine were eligible for inclusion if they met all of the following criteria: aged ≥ 18 years, diagnosis of migraine by a board-certificated neurologist, ≥2 consecutive visits to the neurology department, and a history of triptan use before surgery. Triptan drugs are used specifically to treat migraine; those used at HUMC include almotriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan. We analyzed the effect of migraine, along with other known and putative risk factors, on PONV. Covariates included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), anesthesia duration, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, use of N2O and inhalation anesthetics for maintenance of anesthesia, patient-controlled analgesia after surgery, history of diabetes, history of smoking, use of antiemetics, opioids, steroid, or antibiotics, use of a Levin tube during and after surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and transfusion during surgery

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Continuous data are presented as means and standard deviations, and categorical data as frequencies and percentages. A t-test was performed to compare the continuous data of patients with and without PONV. Categorical data were analyzed by the chi-square test. First, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were calculated for the occurrence of PONV within 24 h after surgery, for each variable, by logistic regression. The OR is a measure of the association between an exposure and an outcome, and in this study represents the likelihood of PONV given a particular exposure compared to the likelihood in its absence. Fully adjusted ORs for PONV were then calculated for each variable, including migraine.
As patients could not be randomized based on the presence of migraine, confounding and selection biases were accounted for by using propensity scores. The rationale for using, and method for calculating, propensity scores for exposure variables have been described previously [21,22]. In this study, performed propensity score matching was conducted for normal patients and those with migraine. Python (version 3.7; Anaconda Inc., Austin, TX, USA) and Pymatch (version 0.3.4; https://github.com/benmiroglio/pymatch) were used for propensity score matching. The propensity scores ranged from 0.07–0.87. All matched cases had scores within 0.0001 of each other, and the matching ratio was 1:1 (1982 migraine patients and 1982 normal controls).
The ORs for PONV in migraine patients were compared to those of the normal controls. In the analysis, covariates and propensity scores were used to calculate adjusted ORs. All P-values were two-sided, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. SPSS software (version 24.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Subject Characteristics

In total, 208,029 patients aged > 18 years underwent GA between January 2010 and October 2019 at HUMC. After excluding 20,323 patients, 187,706 were included in the study. The following patients were excluded: 1383 patients who were re-operated on within 24 h, 6886 unconscious patients, 7997 patients who underwent ventilator therapy after surgery, 2080 patients who had nausea or vomiting before surgery, and 1977 patients who had missing data in their medical records. Among the included patients, 19,786 developed PONV within 24 h after GA and 1982 had migraine. Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of the patients who received GA during surgery. Significant differences were observed in all clinical variables between the PONV and non-PONV patients, except age. PONV occurred in 300 of the 1982 (1.5%) patients with migraine (Table 1).

3.2. Odds Ratio for PONV in Migraineurs

Figure 1 shows the unadjusted and fully adjusted ORs for PONV of each clinical variable. The unadjusted OR for the occurrence of PONV in subjects with versus without migraine was 1.52 (95% CI, 1.34–1.72; p < 0.001). Fully adjusted ORs for the occurrence of PONV and migraine were obtained through a multivariate logistic analysis including all clinical variables and covariates. The fully adjusted OR for the occurrence of PONV in subjects with versus without migraine was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.21–1.56; p < 0.001).
No significant difference was observed in any clinical variable between the propensity score-matched migraine and normal patients (Table 2). The OR for PONV of migraine was high after propensity score matching (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13–1.66; p = 0.001) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

This study examined the impact of migraine on PONV in patients undergoing GA. We enrolled patients who had undergone GA at the HUMC over a 10-year period using the Smart CDW. In total, 208,029 patients aged > 18 years underwent GA, 19,786 developed PONV within 24 h after GA, and 1982 had migraine. The unadjusted and fully adjusted ORs for the occurrence of PONV in migraineurs were 1.52 (95% CI, 1.34–1.72; p < 0.001) and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.21–1.56; p < 0.001) relative to those without migraine, respectively. After propensity score matching, the OR for PONV of migraine remained high (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13–1.66; p = 0.001).
It is believed that PONV has a multifactorial origin and there are numerous risk factors. Risk factors may be classified as “well-established”, “possible”, or “disproved”, according to expert consensus and the opinion of the author, as well as in terms of whether they are patient-, surgery-, or anesthesia-related [5]. Established patient-related risk factors include female gender, nonsmoking status, younger age, and history of motion sickness or PONV. There are also various anesthesia- and surgery-related factors, such as general versus regional anesthesia, duration of anesthesia, use of volatile anesthetics, nitric oxide, and opioids, and type and duration of surgery [5,6,23]. However, few studies have assessed the effect of migraine on PONV, so their relationship is poorly understood. A previous questionnaire-based study on PONV, including 253 patients under GA, reported that PONV was more prevalent in patients with a migraine history [19]. In the only randomized-controlled study to assess the role of migraine history in the development of PONV, 127 women were randomized into groups according to the anesthesia method. Migraine history was a risk factor of PONV, particularly in the GA group, and epidural anesthesia did not affect the likelihood of PONV in women with migraine [20]. Other studies have reported that a history of migraine is more strongly associated with nausea than vomiting [17,18]. Prospective interview-based surveys on the incidence of PONV in surgical in-patients (1107 and 671 patients, respectively) under GA or local anesthesia have been conducted [24,25]. Among the patients in these two studies, 822 (74%) and 480 (72%) received GA, and 166 (15%) and 63 (9.3%) had a migraine history, respectively. Logistic regression and bivariate Dale models of PONV showed that a history of migraine was significantly related to nausea but not vomiting, which was explained by differences in physiological mechanisms [24,25]. Another study proposed that nausea and vomiting should be analyzed separately and considered as “two biologically different phenomena” [26]. Nausea is a subjective sensation involving the activation of certain neural pathways, which ultimately project to the areas of the cerebral hemispheres responsible for conscious sensation. Vomiting is a complex reflex under the control of two functionally distinct medullar centers: the vomiting center in the dorsal part of the lateral reticular formation, and the chemoreceptor trigger zone in the area postrema (in the floor of the fourth ventricle) [18]. However, our study did not consider nausea and vomiting as separate outcomes because they have identical risk factors and predictors [2,17,27,28,29,30,31]. Postoperative nausea is considered as a risk factor for vomiting [5], and there is a strong association between the two symptoms [18]. The neuroanatomical site controlling nausea and vomiting is an ill-defined region called the “vomiting center” within the reticular formation in the brainstem [32]. It receives afferent inputs from the chemoreceptor trigger zone, the vagal mucosal pathway in the GI system, neuronal pathways arising from the vestibular system, reflex afferent pathways arising from the cerebral cortex, and midbrain afferents; it also interacts with the nucleus tractus solitarius [33].
In most previous studies, patients were either asked about migraine symptoms directly or completed a self-reported questionnaire [17,18,19]. Few studies have used chart review for diagnosis. In our study, patients were diagnosed with migraine by board-certificated neurologists or based on ≥2 consecutive visits to the neurology department or a history of triptan drug use. Our study also included a large sample (>200,000 patients), which may have been more representative of patients undergoing GA referred for assessment of PONV than those of several small observational studies and randomized controlled trials that investigated the association between PONV and migraine [17,18,19,20].
PONV is typically associated with anesthesia or secondary to postoperative ileus, which is characterized by inhibition of GI motility following surgery [34]. Anesthesia causes GI distension [9]. All anesthetic and analgesic drugs also have the potential to contribute to postoperative GI tract dysfunction, including nitrous oxide, which accumulates in the body cavity and promotes bowel distension. Opioids have direct and indirect effects on bowel function, leading to decreased motility [35]. In turn, this can result in nausea and vomiting by increasing abdominal pressure and reflux. Anesthetics cause a highly significant pressure drop at the lower esophageal sphincter, and an adaptive change in the tone of the lower esophageal sphincter may occur with a general increase in abdominal pressure [36,37]. However, the adaptive change in the lower esophageal sphincter in response to increased intraabdominal pressure is abnormally small in patients with symptoms of reflux, such as GERD [38]. Previous studies have reported that GERD is associated with, and can predict, PONV [10,39].
Migraines are associated with various GI disorders, such as gastroparesis, GERD, irritable bowel syndrome, and celiac disease [12,13,14], and also cooccur with GI symptoms such as diarrhea, constipation, and dyspepsia [15,16]. A previous web-based survey, and a large CDW study of migraine patients, reported GERD prevalence rates of 22% and 27%, respectively [14,40]. Another clinic-based study reported that the prevalence of GERD was higher in migraineurs than non-migraineurs (42% vs. 18%) [41]. Migraine is often complicated by GI conditions, such as gastric stasis (also called gastroparesis), which is characterized by delayed emptying of the stomach in the absence of mechanical obstruction; its clinical manifestations include nausea, vomiting, and weight loss [42,43]. Previous studies reported gastric stasis in the interictal and ictal periods during spontaneous and induced migraine in migraineurs [44,45]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated empirically that migraineurs experience significant delays in gastric emptying, both during and outside of attacks, compared to non-migraine controls [12]. Taken together, these findings suggest that abnormal gastric motility is not just an acute event; instead, it is a clinical feature of migraine. Therefore, the GI disorders accompanying migraine may increase the incidence of PONV.
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) also plays a central role in migraine and is the target of new migraine treatments. CGRP is a neuropeptide existing in two isoforms. The α isoform is implied in the pathogenesis of migraine pain, while the β isoform is primarily expressed by the enteric sensory system and contributes to the regulation of its motility [46,47]. Previous studies showed that CGRP per se may reduce gastric emptying [48,49]. In migraineurs, novel treatment with the monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway can reduce GI motility and cause constipation [50,51]. Therefore, we suggest that the possible onset of PONV after surgery/anesthesia in patients with migraine is associated with relationship between CGRP and GI motility.
GI tract motor and secretory activities are controlled by a range of neural and hormonal systems. Neural control can be excitatory or inhibitory, local or central, and parasympathetic (predominantly excitatory) or sympathetic (mainly inhibitory) [8]. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction has been linked to both migraine and GI disorders [52,53,54,55,56,57], including in terms of pathogenesis; this may explain the overlap between migraine and GI disorders, such as GERD and gastric stasis. The pathophysiology of PONV is not fully understood. Nausea and vomiting may be induced through a variety of central and peripheral mechanisms. The cortex and vomiting center in the brainstem are influenced by various extrinsic factors, including movement (via the vestibular system), drugs (such as opioids and anesthetics), activity in the area postrema, intestinal vagal afferent fiber activity and pain (in association with surgical manipulation of the gut), and emotions during the perioperative period (mediated by higher cortical centers) [34]. Migraine is associated with a wide range of psychiatric comorbidities, as well as various vestibular symptoms and vestibular syndromes [58,59,60,61]. The pain experienced by migraine sufferers, and the accompanying symptoms such as dizziness, vertigo, and anxiety, are likely to affect the development of PONV.
Our study had several limitations. First, it used data from subjects who visited one university medical center with five hospitals. Therefore, it is difficult to generalize the results to the general population, and the possibility of selection bias must be considered. Second, our study used a retrospective design and we did not collect clinical data on headache characteristics, such as frequency and duration, or medication history (i.e., use of NSAIDs or analgesics). We classified as “migraineurs” if patients met all of the following criteria: diagnosis by a board-certificated neurologist, 2 ≥ visits to the neurology department, and a history of triptan use before surgery to select the accurate diagnosis of migraine. However, due to these strict classification criteria in the diagnosis of migraine, the possibility of selection bias, in which some migraine patients are even classified as controls, cannot be excluded. Finally, we did not analyze the surgeries separately except for laparoscopic surgery. Additional prospective population-based studies are needed to conform the association between migraine and PONV.

5. Conclusions

This study collected the clinical data of a large number of patients from the Smart CDW, in addition to data on numerous risk factors for PONV. The impact of migraine on PONV is controversial, but previous studies had the limitations of small samples and an observational and/or questionnaire-based design. Our findings suggest that migraine has a significant impact on the development of PONV in patients undergoing GA. However, more research is needed to confirm the impact of migraine on PONV.

Author Contributions

Conception and design of the work: J.-H.S., M.-s.L. and J.J.L. Acquisition of data for the work: J.-H.K., S.-H.L., and Y.-S.K. Analysis and interpretation of data for the work: J.-H.K., Y.-S.K., S.-H.L., and J.-H.S. Writing the manuscript: J.-H.K. and J.-H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the NRF of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07045645). The role of funding was in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. No other financial relationships relevant to this publication were disclosed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eberhart, L.H.; Högel, J.; Seeling, W.; Staack, A.M.; Geldner, G.; Georgieff, M. Evaluation of three risk scores to predict postoperative nausea and vomiting. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2000, 44, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Apfel, C.C.; Läärä, E.; Koivuranta, M.; Greim, C.A.; Roewer, N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: Conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 1999, 91, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Apfel, C.C.; Kranke, P.; Katz, M.H.; Goepfert, C.; Papenfuss, T.; Rauch, S.; Heineck, R.; Greim, C.A.; Roewer, N. Volatile anaesthetics may be the main cause of early but not delayed postoperative vomiting: A randomized controlled trial of factorial design. Br. J. Anaesth. 2002, 88, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tramèr, M.R. Treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 2003, 327, 762–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gan, T.J. Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthsia Analg. 2006, 102, 1884–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Apfel, C.C.; Heidrich, F.M.; Jukar-Rao, S.; Jalota, L.; Hornuss, C.; Whelan, R.P.; Zhang, K.; Cakmakkaya, O.S. Evidence-based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br. J. Anaesth. 2012, 109, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Murphy, M.J.; Hooper, V.D.; Sullivan, E.; Clifford, T.; Apfel, C.C. Identification of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting in the perianesthesia adult patient. J. Perianesthesia. Nurs. 2006, 21, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mythen, M.G. Postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction. Anesthsia Analg. 2005, 100, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Foldes, F.F.; Kepes, E.R.; Ship, A.G. Severe gastrointestinal distension during nitrous oxide and oxygen anesthesia. JAMA 1965, 194, 1146–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kwon, Y.S.; Choi, J.W.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J.J. Effect of a preoperative proton pump inhibitor and gastroesophageal reflux disease on postoperative nausea and vomiting. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Stefanidis, D.; Hope, W.W.; Kohn, G.P.; Reardon, P.R.; Richardson, W.S.; Fanelli, R.D. Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg. Endosc. 2010, 24, 2647–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Aurora, S.K.; Papapetropoulos, S.; Kori, S.H.; Kedar, A.; Abell, T.L. Gastric stasis in migraineurs: Etiology, characteristics, and clinical and therapeutic implications. Cephalalgia 2013, 33, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cady, R.K.; Farmer, K.; Dexter, J.K.; Hall, J. The bowel and migraine: Update on celiac disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2012, 16, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Katic, B.J.; Golden, W.; Cady, R.K.; Hu, X.H. GERD prevalence in migraine patients and the implication for acute migraine treatment. J. Headache Pain 2009, 10, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kurth, T.; Holtmann, G.; Neufang-Huber, J.; Gerken, G.; Diener, H.C. Prevalence of unexplained upper abdominal symptoms in patients with migraine. Cephalalgia 2006, 26, 506–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Aamodt, A.H.; Stovner, L.J.; Hagen, K.; Zwart, J.A. Comorbidity of headache and gastrointestinal complaints. The head-hunt study. Cephalalgia 2008, 28, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Koivuranta, M.; Läärä, E.; Snåre, L.; Alahuhta, S. A survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia 1997, 52, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stadler, M.; Bardiau, F.; Seidel, L.; Albert, A.; Boogaerts, J.G. Difference in risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 2003, 98, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grabowska-Gaweł, A.; Porzych, K.; Piskunowicz, G. Risk factors and frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients operated under general anesthesia. Prz. Lek. 2006, 63, 72–76. [Google Scholar]
  20. Khoronenko, V.E.; Baskakov, D.S. Role of migraine history in the development of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing general and combined general-epidural anesthesia. Anesteziol. Reanimatol. 2014, 2, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  21. Brookhart, M.A.; Schneeweiss, S.; Rothman, K.J.; Glynn, R.J.; Avorn, J.; Stürmer, T. Variable selection for propensity score models. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 163, 1149–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Joffe, M.M.; Rosenbaum, P.R. Invited commentary: Propensity scores. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1999, 150, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tateosian, V.S.; Champagne, K.; Gan, T.J. What is new in the battle against postoperative nausea and vomiting? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2018, 32, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Camu, F.; Lauwers, M.H.; Verbessem, D. Incidence and aetiology of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. Suppl. 1992, 6, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Andrews, P.L. Physiology of nausea and vomiting. Br. J. Anaesth. 1992, 69, 2s–19s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tramèr, M.R. A rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: Evidence from systematic reviews. Part II. Recommendations for prevention and treatment, and research agenda. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2001, 45, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Palazzo, M.; Evans, R. Logistic regression analysis of fixed patient factors for postoperative sickness: A model for risk assessment. Br. J. Anaesth. 1993, 70, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Apfel, C.C.; Greim, C.A.; Haubitz, I.; Goepfert, C.; Usadel, J.; Sefrin, P.; Roewer, N. A risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in adults. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1998, 42, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sinclair, D.R.; Chung, F.; Mezei, G. Can postoperative nausea and vomiting be predicted? Anesthesiology 1999, 91, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eberhart, L.H.; Geldner, G.; Kranke, P.; Morin, A.M.; Schäuffelen, A.; Treiber, H.; Wulf, H. The development and validation of a risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients. Anesth. Analg. 2004, 99, 1630–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Van den Bosch, J.E.; Moons, K.G.; Bonsel, G.J.; Kalkman, C.J. Does measurement of preoperative anxiety have added value for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting? Anesth. Analg. 2005, 100, 1525–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chatterjee, S.; Rudra, A.; Sengupta, S. Current concepts in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiol. Res. Pract. 2011, 748031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Shaikh, S.I.; Nagarekha, D.; Hegade, G.; Marutheesh, M. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: A simple yet complex problem. Anesth. Essays Res. 2016, 10, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kreis, M.E. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Auton. Neurosci. 2006, 129, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Holte, K.; Kehlet, H. Postoperative ileus: Progress towards effective management. Drugs 2002, 62, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sehhati, G.; Frey, R.; Star, E.G. The action of inhalation anesthetics upon the lower oesophageal sphincter. Acta Anaesthesiol. Belg. 1980, 31, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cotton, B.R.; Smith, G. The lower oesophageal sphincter and anaesthesia. Br. J. Anaesth. 1984, 56, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lind, J.F.; Crispin, J.S.; McIver, D.K. The effect of atropine on the gastroesophageal sphincter. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1968, 46, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Powell, P.W.W.; Vasudevan, M.; Rall, M.; Carrithers, J.A. Gastroesophageal reflux disease as a predictor for post operative nausea and vomiting. In Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Society Anesthesiologists, San Diego, CA, USA, 16 October 2010; p. A213. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, S.H.; Lee, J.J.; Kwon, Y.; Kim, J.H.; Sohn, J.H. Clinical implications of associations between headache and gastrointestinal disorders: A study using the hallym smart clinical data warehouse. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Peskersoy, C.; Peker, S.; Kaya, A.; Unalp, A.; Gokay, N. Evaluation of the relationship between migraine disorder andoral comorbidities: Multicenter randomized clinical trial. Turk. Med. Sci. 2016, 46, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Masaoka, T.; Tack, J. Gastroparesis: Current concepts and management. Gut Liver 2009, 3, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Parkman, H.P. Migraine and gastroparesis from a gastroenterologist’s perspective. Headache 2013, 53, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Aurora, S.K.; Kori, S.H.; Barrodale, P.; McDonald, S.A.; Haseley, D. Gastric stasis in migraine: More than just a paroxysmal abnormality during a migraine attack. Headache 2006, 46, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aurora, S.; Kori, S.; Barrodale, P.; Nelsen, A.; McDonald, S. Gastric stasis occurs in spontaneous, visually induced, and interictal migraine. Headache 2007, 47, 1443–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Deen, M.; Correnti, E.; Kamin, K.; Keiderman, T.; Papeti, L.; Rubio Beltran, E.; Vigneri, S.; Edvisson, L.; Van Den Brink, A.M. On the behalf of the European headache federation school of advanced studies (EHF-SAS) blocking CGRP in migraine patients-a review of pros and cons. J. Headache Pain 2017, 18, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tiseo, C.; Ornello, R.; Pistoia, F.; Sacco, S. How to integrate monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor in daily clinical practice. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Jurgen, L.H. Calcitonin and CGRP inhibit gastrointestinal transit via distinct neuronal pathways. Am. J. Phys. 1988, 254, G920–G924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. L’Heureux, M.C.; St-Pierre, S.; Trudel, L.; Plourde, V.; Lepage, R.; Poitraus, P. Digestive motor effects and vascular actions of CGRP in dog are expressed by different receptor subtypes. Peptides 2000, 21, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Frattale, L.; Ornello, R.; Pistoia, F.; Caponnetto, V.; Colangeli, E.; Sacco, S. Paralytic ileus after planned abdominal surgery in a patient on treatment with erenmab. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2020, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Haanes, K.A.; Edvinsson, L.; Sams, A. Understanding side-effects of anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptor antibodies. J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Haug, T.T.; Svebak, S.; Hausken, T.; Wilhelmsen, I.; Berstad, A.; Ursin, H. Low vagal activity as mediating mechanism for the relationship between personality factors and gastric symptoms in functional dyspepsia. Psychosom. Med. 1994, 56, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hausken, T.; Svebak, S.; Wilhelmsen, I.; Haug, T.T.; Olafsen, K.; Pettersson, E.; Hveem, K.; Berstad, A. Low vagal tone and antral dysmotility in patients with functional dyspepsia. Psychosom. Med. 1993, 55, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shechter, A.; Stewart, W.F.; Silberstein, S.D.; Lipton, R.B. Migraine and autonomic nervous system function: A population-based, case-control study. Neurology 2002, 58, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lorena, S.L.; Figueiredo, M.J.; Almeida, J.R.; Mesquita, M.A. Autonomic function in patients with functional dyspepsia assessed by 24-hour heart rate variability. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2002, 47, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Heitkemper, M.; Burr, R.L.; Jarrett, M.; Hertig, V.; Lustyk, M.K.; Bond, E.F. Evidence for autonomic nervous system imbalance in women with irritable bowel syndrome. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1998, 43, 2093–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Peroutka, S.J. Migraine: A chronic sympathetic nervous system disorder. Headache 2004, 44, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Minen, M.T.; De Dhaem, O.B.; Van Diest, A.K.; Powers, S.; Schwedt, T.J.; Lipton, R.; Silbersweig, D. Migraine and its psychiatric comorbidities. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2016, 87, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lampl, C.; Rapoport, A.; Levin, M.; Bräutigam, E. Migraine and episodic Vertigo: A cohort survey study of their relationship. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Neuhauser, H.K.; Radtke, A.; von Brevern, M.; Feldmann, M.; Lezius, F.; Ziese, T.; Lempert, T. Migrainous vertigo: Prevalence and impact on quality of life. Neurology 2006, 67, 1028–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bisdorff, A.; Andree, C.; Vaillant, M.; Sandor, P.S. Headache-associated dizziness in a headache population: Prevalence and impact. Cephalalgia 2010, 30, 815–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 09 03154 g001 550
Figure 1. Unadjusted (a) and fully adjusted (b) odds ratios for postoperative nausea and vomiting of each variable. PONV, postoperative nausea and vomiting; BMI, body mass index; ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; PCA, patient-controlled analgesia; DM, diabetes.
Figure 1. Unadjusted (a) and fully adjusted (b) odds ratios for postoperative nausea and vomiting of each variable. PONV, postoperative nausea and vomiting; BMI, body mass index; ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; PCA, patient-controlled analgesia; DM, diabetes.
Jcm 09 03154 g001
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of subjects.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of subjects.
Non-PONV
n = 167,920		PONV
n = 19,786		p-Value
Age (Years, mean ± SD)49.3 ± 16.949.5 ± 16.20.282
Female (n (%))83,803(49.9)14,696 (74.3)<0.0001
BMI (Mean ± SD)24.2 ± 3.823.8 ± 3.7<0.0001
Anesthesia Time (Minutes, Mean ± SD)135.7 ± 91.2153.4 ± 89.8<0.0001
ASA PS ≥ 3 (n, (%))20,199 (12.0)2227 (11.3)0.002
N2O (n (%)) 38,080 (22.7)3473 (17.6)<0.0001
Inhalation Anesthetics (n (%))160,757 (95.7)19,187 (97.0)<0.0001
PCA (n (%))73,583 (43.8)13,548 (68.5)<0.0001
DM (n (%))19,589 (11.7)1920 (9.7)<0.0001
Smoking (n (%))32,408 (19.3)1731 (8.7)<0.0001
Opioids (n (%))146,743 (87.4)18,091 (91.4)<0.0001
Antiemetics (n (%))90,457 (53.9)14,573 (73.7)<0.0001
Steroid (n (%))10,828 (6.4)796 (4.0)<0.0001
Neostigmine (n (%))47,437 (28.2)6551 (33.6)<0.0001
Antibiotics (n (%))151,231 (90.1)18,023 (91.1)<0.0001
Levin tube (n (%))3416 (2.0)398 (2.0)0.028
Laparoscopic surgery (n (%))36,211 (21.6)5333 (27.0)<0.0001
Transfusion (n, (%))6914 (4.1)1005 (5.1)<0.0001
Migraine (n (%))1682 (1.0)300 (1.5)<0.0001
PONV, postoperative nausea and vomiting; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; PCA, patient-controlled analgesia; DM, diabetes.
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of the two groups after propensity score matching.
Table 2. Characteristics of the two groups after propensity score matching.
Migraine
n = 1982		Normal
n = 1982		Dp-Value
Age (years, mean ± SD)47.82 ± 15.2147.37 ± 16.800.030.373
Female (n (%))1459 (73.6%)1454 (73.4%)0.010.857
BMI (mean ± SD)24.57±4.3924.48±4.110.010.510
Anesthesia time
(Minutes, Mean ± SD)		121.30 ± 78.60119.12 ± 73.950.030.369
ASA PS ≥ 3 (n (%))309 (15.6%)299 (15.1%)0.020.659
N2O (n, (%))321 (16.2%)333 (16.8%)0.020.608
Inhalation Anesthetics (n (%))1892 (95.5%)1901 (95.9%)0.060.482
PCA (n (%))778 (39.3%)775 (39.1%)<0.010.922
DM (n (%))170 (8.6%)159 (8.0%)0.040.527
Smoking (n (%))258 (13.0%)292 (14.7%)0.080.118
Opioids (n (%))1787 (90.2%)1795 (1795%)0.030.667
Antiemetics (n (%))1000 (50.5%)1007 (50.8%)0.010.824
Steroid (n (%))134 (6.8%)152 (7.7)0.070.269
Neostigmine (n (%))691 (34.9%)663 (33.5%)0.030.348
Antibiotics (n (%))1776 (89.6%)1778 (89.7%)0.010.917
Levin tube (n (%))16 (0.8%)13 (0.7%)0.100.576
Laparoscopic surgery (n (%))405 (20.4%)385 (19.4%)0.030.426
Transfusion (n (%))50 (2.5%)57 (2.9%)0.070.493
PONV, postoperative nausea and vomiting; BMI, body mass index; ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; PCA, patient-controlled analgesia; DM, diabetes.
Table
Table 3. Adjusted odds ratios for PONV of migraine after propensity score matching.
Table 3. Adjusted odds ratios for PONV of migraine after propensity score matching.
Odds Ratio (95% CI)p-Value
Unadjusted 1.36 (1.13–1.63)0.001
Fully Adjusted1.37 (1.13–1.66)0.001
All Covariates + Propensity Score-Adjusted1.37 (1.13–1.66)0.001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.-H.; Lim, M.-s.; Lee, S.-H.; Kwon, Y.-S.; Lee, J.J.; Sohn, J.-H. Consideration of Migraines Among Risk Factors for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3154. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103154

AMA Style

Kim J-H, Lim M-s, Lee S-H, Kwon Y-S, Lee JJ, Sohn J-H. Consideration of Migraines Among Risk Factors for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(10):3154. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jong-Ho, Man-sup Lim, Sang-Hwa Lee, Young-Suk Kwon, Jae Jun Lee, and Jong-Hee Sohn. 2020. "Consideration of Migraines Among Risk Factors for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 10: 3154. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop