Next Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Characterization of the Spontaneous Mesenchymal–Epithelial Transition in the PMC42 Breast Cancer Cell Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Early Chronic Kidney Disease and Main Associated Factors in Spanish Population: Populational Study
Previous Article in Journal
Blood Flow Restriction Increases the Neural Activation of the Knee Extensors During Very Low-Intensity Leg Extension Exercise in Cardiovascular Patients: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Health-Related Behaviors on Disease Progression and Mortality in Early Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Korean Nationwide Population-Based Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 8
Issue 8
10.3390/jcm8081254
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Kidney Disease in HIV Infection

by
Gaetano Alfano
1,2,*,†,
Gianni Cappelli
1,2,†,
Francesco Fontana
2,
Luca Di Lullo
3,
Biagio Di Iorio
4,
Antonio Bellasi
5 and
Giovanni Guaraldi
6
1
Surgical, Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences, Section of Nephrology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
2
Nephrology Dialysis and Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
3
Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, “L. Parodi–Delfino” Hospital, 00034 Colleferro, Italy
4
Department of Medicine, AORN “Antonio Cardarelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
5
Department of Research, Innovation, Brand Reputation, Ospedale di Bergamo, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
6
Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(8), 1254; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081254
Submission received: 13 July 2019 / Revised: 7 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published: 19 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Symptoms, Diagnostics and Treatments of Chronic Kidney Diseases (CKD))
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has significantly improved life expectancy of infected subjects, generating a new epidemiological setting of people aging withHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). People living with HIV (PLWH), having longer life expectancy, now face several age-related conditions as well as side effects of long-term exposure of ART. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common comorbidity in this population. CKD is a relentlessly progressive disease that may evolve toward end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and significantly affect quality of life and risk of death. Herein, we review current understanding of renal involvement in PLWH, mechanisms and risk factors for CKD as well as strategies for early recognition of renal dysfunction and best care of CKD.

1. Introduction

Despite epidemiological data reporting a reduction of new cases of HIV infection, its prevalence tends to augment globally because effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) has substantially increased survival of people living with HIV (PLWH), generating a new epidemiological setting of individuals aging with HIV [1].
Nowadays, life expectancy of highly educated PLWH treated chronically with combined ART has reached that of the uninfected counterpart [2]. The aging PLWH are therefore at risk for several age-related diseases including chronic kidney disease (CKD) [3]. Besides aging, several risk factors such as viral infection itself, ART, HIV-related comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease), coinfection (Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), tuberculosis) and polypharmacy impact significantly on the development of kidney disease in this vulnerable population.
CKD is a relentlessly progressive disease that may evolve toward end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It contributes to poor quality of life and increases mortality of all affected subjects because it is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, cognitive decline and bone disorders—comorbidities commonly found in PLWH, irrespective of their renal function [4]. Hence, superimposition of renal impairment on a complex disease such as HIV infection tends to increase the burden of comorbidities and, theoretically, predicts a worse outcome in this population. The best strategy to counteract the risk of CKD is based on prevention and early recognition of renal dysfunction as well as early initiation of ART in order to prevent long-lasting viral replication, which in turn is responsible for potential kidney damage [5]. The aim of this review is to provide a descriptive overview of the current understanding of CKD in the setting of HIV infection, focusing on prevalence, presentation, pathogenesis and treatment. Description of collateral issues such as comorbidities, coinfection and polypharmacy in PLWH who experienced CKD is out of the scope of this review.

2. Epidemiology of CKD in the Setting of HIV Infection

The measure of incidence and prevalence of CKD in the setting of HIV infection varies across geographic areas with large differences also within the same continent. Variability depends on a series of multiple factors such as methods to evaluate renal function, CKD definition, genetic heterogeneity, prevention program, access to health care system and initiation of combined ART. The first obstacle to overcome is the correct assessment of renal function since none of the methods used to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) have been validated in PLWH. The most widely used serum creatinine-based GFR estimating equations tend to be inaccurate in PLWH [6]. The major pitfall is the measurement of serum creatinine since it does not reflect true renal function in individuals with loss of lean body mass and malnutrition. Even cystatin C, an alternative marker of kidney function not-related to lean muscle mass, needs further studies before to be used in this population because it is influenced by HIV replication [7]. In addition, as in non-infected patients, it is unclear whether age-related decline in GFR reflects or not a physiologic process in this subset of population.
Nuclear medicine method using 99mTc DTPA plasma clearance is the gold standard for GFR assessment, but it is impractical in resource-limited countries. In these settings, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) [8]—or Cockcroft−Gault (CG) [9]—based eGFRs result in the most practical and economical methods to asses renal function.
The estimated prevalence of CKD in HIV population—measured using CKD-EPI equation [8]—ranges from 2.5 % in Europe to 7.4% in North America [10]. If we consider that 36.9 million of people are currently living with HIV worldwide [1], CKD represents a challenging problem with enormous implications for the national health care systems, probably not destined to be managed effectively in the next years given that the prevalence of CKD is expected to increase in this population [10]. PLWH have a slightly higher risk of developing CKD than HIV-uninfected subjects, but once CKD has commenced, the likelihood of developing ESRD is 2- to 20-fold greater compared to the uninfected counterpart [11,12]. The increased susceptibility is given by the combination of both traditional and HIV-specific risk factors for kidney disease. The first ones, commonly encountered in general population, include age, hypertension and diabetes [13]. The second are HIV replication, AIDS status, hepatitis B and C coinfection, low CD4 nadir, lipodystrophy and ART [10,14,15,16]. In a recent paper, Althoff et al. [17] elegantly estimated the population attributable fractions of preventable or modifiable HIV-related (CD4+ T-cell count and viral load) and traditional risk factors for several conditions including ESRD. The findings of this study showed that a substantial proportion of cases of ESRD could be prevented with interventions on traditional risk factors including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and smoking cessation.
Epidemiological studies have revealed that patients of African descent have an 18 to 50% higher risk of developing HIV-related ESRD compared to whites [16,18,19]. This racial disparity is explained principally by a severe disease with rapid progression to renal insufficiency in people of African ancestry [16]. However, the risk of renal disease is not the same in all region of the African continent. Notably, West Africa has the highest prevalence of kidney disease [10]: 14.6% in studies using MDRD equation [20] and 9.2% in studies using CKD-EPI equation [8]. This unique susceptibility to developing renal disease is principally due to genetic factors. Techniques that examined ancestry informative markers have revealed that black patients, especially those living in West Africa and South Africa, carry certain polymorphisms that are linked with an aggressive course of HIV-associated nephropathy. In the last decade, risk alleles G1 and G2 of APO1, a gene sited on chromosome 22, have been strongly associated with the development of the most severe form of HIV-associated glomerulonephrites such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) [21,22]. Because up to 20–30% of patients of African origin have no APOL1 risk alleles, other variables may contribute to the profile risk in developing HIV-related nephropathy [23]. Among them, confounding environmental factors such as inadequate access to health care services and tendency of some national health policies to start ARTs at defined CD4 T-cell count cutoffs [24] need to be strongly considered because they may impact on the increased risk of CKD.

3. HIV Involvement in Kidney Disease

HIV infection is a chronic life-long illness which determines kidney damage essentially through a direct and indirect mechanism that may affect all structures of the nephron (Figure 1). The first is related to the cytopathic effect of the virus within the renal parenchymal cells resulting in the disruption of the normal cell activity. The second is not directly related to the pathological interaction of the virus with the infected cells, but relies on pseudopathological response of the immune system to HIV infections (e.g., formation of immune complexes depositing in the kidneys, hyperimmune reaction to HIV antigens), use of nephrotoxic drugs or other superimposed infections.
In order to offer a complete overview of renal disease in the context of chronic HIV infection, in February 2018 the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) has classified the nephropathies according to the tissue compartment involved [25] (Table 1). The classification reports also diabetic and age-related lesions diagnosed in the setting of HIV.
Given the wide variability of renal pathologies, renal biopsy remains the best way to diagnose kidney disease accurately. To date, it is difficult to establish the likelihood of HIV as the etiologic factor of the aforementioned nephropathy because the identification of HIV antigens and specific anti-HIV antibodies within renal parenchyma is not practicable in the routine pathology laboratories. There is a reasonable grade of certainty only in classical HIVAN and in podocytopathies in HIV-infected newborns, whereas in all other cases causality is variable and is graded as high, medium and low.
According to the latest KDIGO classification, we describe histological, clinical features and principles of treatment of the most common nephropathies encountered in HIV settings.

3.1. Glomerular-Dominant HIV-Related Diseases

HIVAN is a well-defined clinicopathologic entity manifesting as collapsing glomerulopathy associated with a consistent tubulointerstitial disease. The collapsed glomerulus is accompanied by dramatic hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the overlying glomerular epithelial cells, which tend to fill the urinary space [26]. IgM, C3 and C1q are generally detected in the collapsed segments and mesangial areas.
Tubules are focally enlarged (microcysts) and contain glass cast; often there is tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis and inflammation. At electron microscopy evaluation, the collapsed tuft is characterized by wrinkling of the glomerular basement membrane and hypertrophy of the overlying podocytes. Foot process effacement is observed both in collapsed and non-collapsed glomerulus. Classical HIVAN is strongly associated with APOL1 risk allele [27], South Africans [28] and low CD4+ T-cell count [29]. It manifests during acute HIV infection or AIDS-defining illness. Kidneys appear echogenic and often are enlarged on ultrasound imaging. Main clinical presentation is nephrotic proteinuria and rapid progression to ESRD. The mainstay of treatment for an ART-naïve patient is initiating antiretroviral drugs and avoiding potentially nephrotoxic agents. More importantly, ART may protect infected children from HIVAN, a disease associated with a tragic outcome in areas where there is a lack of facilities for renal replacement therapy (RRT) [30].
In the pre-ART era, several therapies were attempted to treat HIV-associated nephropathy. Observational studies showed that corticosteroid, the first-line therapy for non-HIV-related focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, was beneficial in the treatment of HIVAN [31,32,33,34].
In a retrospective cohort of 21 patients with biopsy-proven HIVAN, corticosteroid was administered at dosage of 60 mg for one month, followed by tapering over several months. Treated patients had a significantly slower progression of renal failure and improvement of proteinuria without an increased risk of infection, but relapse of proteinuria was common after reduction or steroid withdrawal [35]. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines [36] suggests treating HIVAN promptly with ART to reduce the risk of progression to ESRD. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers should be used in the presence of stable renal function, and dose should be adjusted carefully in order to prevent hyperkalemia.
The strategy is to administer corticosteroid therapy in patients with progressive worsening of renal function despite optimal therapy with ART and angiotensin inhibition after exclusion of recent or subclinical chronic infections such as tuberculosis or viral hepatitis. In case of relapse, a further cycle of steroid is used in order to attain remission of proteinuria. Physicians should keep in mind that systemic corticosteroid may have notable infective complications (e.g., reactivation of herpes virus infections, tuberculosis, progression of Kaposi sarcoma and mucocutaneous candidiasis) as well as metabolic side effects (i.e., hyperglycemia, hypertension, osteoporosis and gastrointestinal ulceration) [37]. Therefore, a careful balance of the short-and long-term risks and potential benefits of steroid therapy should be undertaken before its use.
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), not otherwise specified (NOS), in the setting of HIV, is a virus-mediated attenuated form of FSGS. The main lesion is segmental sclerosis/segmental obliteration of capillary loops with matrix increase (with or without hyalinosis) within the glomerulus and adherence of capillary tuft to Bowman’s capsule [26]. Tubulointerstitial disease and the grade of podocyte effacement are generally less prominent than HIVAN. Different to HIVAN, it is more frequent in Caucasians than in African-Americans [27,38]. This variant is usually encountered in patients treated with ART with an undetectable viral load.
It is unclear whether FSGS represents an identity different from HIVAN or lies in the same spectrum; it may be an attenuated histopathological pattern of HIVAN in patients treated with ART [27,38]. However, to confirm a presumed causality with HIV, other causes of FSGF should be excluded. Differential diagnosis of FSGS includes primary (idiopathic) FSGS, virus-associated forms (e.g., parvovirus B19 infection, SV40 infection, acute Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection), drug induced-forms (e.g., interferon therapy, pamidronate toxicity) and forms mediated by adaptive structural-functional responses (e.g., hypertensive arterionephrosclerosis, diabetes, obesity). Treatment strategy is similar to that of HIVAN.
Immune complex kidney disease is a group of glomerulonephritis that includes IgA nephropathy (IgAN), lupus-like nephritis, membranous nephropathy and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Technically, it is difficult to establish a clear causal link between these glomerulonephrites and viral infection; thus, the diagnosis of immune complex kidney disease in the setting of HIV remains plausible only when other secondary causes have been excluded. Clinical presentation is variable and depends on the location and extension of glomerular immune deposits. Generally, urinary sediment is active with dysmorphic red cells, there is a variable degree of proteinuria and the serum creatinine may be normal or elevated. Prognosis is better than HIVAN.
All glomerulonephritis but IgAN seem benefit from administration of ART [39]. If ART does not modify the course of glomerulonephritis ACE-Is or ARBs should be considered in relation to the grade of renal dysfunction. Immunosuppressive agents including steroids can be used in case of disease progression although this recommendation is not evidence-based as it derives from single clinical case reports and case series [40].

3.2. Tubulointerstitial-Dominant HIV-Related Diseases

Tubulointerstitial disease in the setting of HIV is due to classical HIVAN, drug toxicity or infections.
Two forms are related to abnormal response of immune system to HIV: (i) diffuse infiltrative lymphocytosis syndrome (DILS) and (ii) immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). The first is a hyperimmune reaction against HIV antigens. The second is an inflammatory syndrome directed against infectious antigens disseminated in the renal parenchyma, elicited by the recovery of immune system after starting of ART [41]. Both diseases are rare and are characterized by prominent interstitial CD8 T-cell infiltrates.
Treatment of tubulointerstitial disease in the setting of HIVAN is described above, whereas management of drug nephrotoxicity and infectious disease is targeted to remove the offending agent and to treat the underlying infection, respectively.
First-line treatment of DILS is ART. Six to eight weeks of steroid are used to resolve severe organ dysfunction and allow rapid recovery of their function [42].
Management of IRIS is complex because phytopathology of the disorder is unknown. In the majority of cases, ART is continued and opportunistic infection is treated accordingly. Steroids may be needed for patients who develop severe kidney disease [37].

3.3. Vascular-Dominant HIV-Related Diseases

Vascular disease is the result of both direct and indirect effect of HIV infection on vessels. Although the virus is able to infect and dysregulate endothelial cells, multiple factors such as ART, HIV-associated comorbidities (i.e., dyslipidemia, chronic inflammations), traditional risk factors for arteriosclerosis (i.e., age, smoking, alcohol use) and nontraditional risk factors (i.e., hepatitis C, substance use or abuse) affect the development of vasculopathy. PLWH are prone to experience progressive atherosclerosis that involves pathological lipid metabolism and inappropriate activation of innate and adaptive immune systems in the arterial wall [43]. The process is so early that ART-naïve children without a significant burden or duration of risk factors for coronary heart disease have an increased carotid intima–media thickness (marker of atherosclerosis) compared to children without HIV infection [44].
Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) syndrome is a life-threating manifestation of HIV infection. The disease affects small blood vessels, and endothelial cell injury appears to be the primary event. It manifests with thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, microvascular thrombosis and multisystem organ dysfunction [45]. The spectrum of renal injury ranges from mild to severe, sometimes requiring RRT [40]. The first step in the diagnosis of HIV-related TMA is rolling out infections and malignancies. These are common in patients with HIV/AIDS and can be themselves causes of purpura thrombocytopenic (TTP) or precipitating factors for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Treatment of TTP driven by HIV is based on the institution of ART, plasma exchange, and immune suppression (second-line therapy) [46]. Anti-C5 monoclonal antibody (eculizumab) is instead effective for the treatment of aHUS [47].

3.4. Other, in the Setting of HIV Infection

Diabetic nephropathy and arterionephrosclerosis may develop in PLWH given their multiple risk factors. HIV infection is associated with a four-fold increased risk of type 2 diabetes [48] and a poor glycemic control [49] compared to the uninfected counterpart. In a murine model, the expression of HIV-1 genes aggravates the progression of diabetic nephropathy, probably due to an upregulation of inflammatory citokines [50]. Arterionephrosclerosis is secondary to hypertension. Both diabetic nephropathy and arterionephrosclerosis manifest with proteinuria that may progress to nephrotic range in patients with long-term diabetes and severe hypertension.
Histological evaluation of kidney biopsy in diabetic nephropathy and arterionephrosclerosis shows both typical lesions of the underlying disease (e.g., Kimmelstein–Wilson nodules in diabetics and arterial wall medial thickening with arteriolar hyaline deposits in arterionephroslerosis) and sclerosis involving the perihilar region of the glomerulus. This latter histological pattern is compatible with a diagnosis of adaptive FSGS resulting from an excessive workload of the remaining nephrons. Treatment is directed toward the underlying cause.

4. Nephrotoxicity of ART

WHO guidelines recommend a combination of three drugs to suppress HIV replication and prevent the development of drug-resistance strains. Therapy is generally based on two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (the “backbone” of ART) and a third agent from another class.
The advent of ART has dramatically changed outcome of HIV+ patients in the last two decades reducing mortality and risk of progression to AIDS, even though important adverse side effects including nephrotoxicity arose with its use. Direct renal injury occurs with tubular dysfunction, acute interstitial nephritis and renal calculi. Indirect mechanisms of injury are due to medication dosing errors, drug–drug interactions, ART-induced rhabdomyolysis, lactic acidosis and metabolic complications.
Here we describe principal direct and indirect renal toxicity mediated by current antiretroviral drugs.

5. Direct Mechanism

5.1. Tenofovir

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a “preferred” nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) widely used as part of antiretroviral therapy. Tenofovir is eliminated by renal elimination; dose-interval adjustments are mandatory in patients with renal impairment, even though its use is not recommended when GFR is less than 60 mL/min [36]. Nephrotoxicity of TDF has been extensively debated during the last decade because studies provided controversial results. Whereas clinical trial [51] and post-marketing report [52] did not report significant nephrotoxicity, observational studies [53,54,55,56,57] showed a concerning decline of renal function in a minority of patients [58]. Likely, the exclusion from trials of patients with CKD and the more frequent use of a less sensitive serum creatinine level than eGFR accounted for these differences. To shed light on this issue, a meta-analysis that included 10,889 participants showed that TDF-containing ART regimens were associated with a modest but significant loss of kidney function and a higher risk of acute renal injury compared to controls [59].
TDF causes kidney damage in 1–5% [52,60,61,62] of the cases, principally in patients with pre-existing renal disease, risk factors for CKD, concomitant use of potentially nephrotoxic agents, a low CD4 T-cell count and viral hepatitis B and/or C [63,64,65,66]. The risk of TDF-nephrotoxicity seems to increase with the concomitant use of other antiretroviral regimens; in particular, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) induces a greater decline in GFR than a non-NRTI agent, by increasing TDF exposure [57,67].
The mechanism underlying kidney damage is partially known, but it is likely related—as all NRTIs—to mitochondrial toxicity [68]. The main site of toxicity is the proximal tubule [69]. In a large cohort of 1202 patients, TDF increased the risk of proximal renal tubulopathy of about 3.3 fields compared with tenofovir-naïve patients [70]. Tubular dysfunction manifests with phosphaturia, hypophosphatemia and in an increase in serum alkaline phosphatase [71]. A complete Fanconi syndrome, characterized by a variable grade of glycosuria without diabetes, aminoaciduria, phosphaturia and renal tubular acidosis is instead uncommon in these patients. The most severe consequence of the loss of phosphate is an increased bone turnover manifesting with osteomalacia, a disease characterized by impaired mineralization in regenerating bone and pseudo-fracture around multiple joints [72].
Proximal tubular dysfunction is often overlooked because laboratory examinations show mild alterations, and initial presentation occurs without changes in kidney function; therefore, the diagnosis is often tardive and made during the worsening of renal function. TDF is able to induce distal tubular toxicity manifesting as nephrogenic diabetes insipidus [73] and distal renal tubular acidosis [74]. Compared to proximal renal tubular acidosis, determined by a defect in the ability to reabsorb bicarbonate, distal tubular acidosis is characterized by impairment in net acid secretion.
Tubular toxicity can lead to both a rapid and gradual reduction of renal function [75] which generally occurs during the first six months from its administration [67].
Acute renal failure has been reported between <1 and 2.2% [52,76,77]. There are conflicting data about reversibility of kidney injury after an episode of acute kidney insufficiency (AKI). It seems that renal dysfunction is only in part reversible [78,79,80]. A study conducted in 24 PLWH males, who stopped TDF for worsening of renal function, showed that renal injury was fully reversible only in 42% of subjects. Recovery of renal function occurred until the fifth month but the most improvement was documented during the first month after TDF withdrawal. The greatest GFR improvement was seen in patients with a rapid onset of AKI and a combining therapy with a PI/r. This suggests that a more rapid and, thus a more clinically recognizable, worsening of renal function is more likely to be fully reversible. Consequently, it is possible that the prolonged use of TDF causes an irreversible chronic tubule-interstitial fibrosis preventing the full recovery of the injury. However, the overall rate of discontinuation of TDF due to adverse renal events was lower than 2% [54,77,81].
Given the large use of TDF in ART regimen, all patients should be periodically evaluated (biannually) for tubular toxicity with analysis of serum phosphate level, and urine protein and glucose content [82]. This is particularly valid for patients with a combining therapy with ritonavir-boosted PIs. Data on use of TDF in patients with CKD are scarce and limited at one study in which the dose of the drug was inappropriately high for the grade of renal dysfunction. However, two of them (15.3%) experienced a concerning increment of serum creatinine level [77]. Dosage of beta 2-microglobulin, a marker of tubule damage, has been used to identify early patients who are at increased risk of kidney disease [83]. Nishijima et al. [84] documented for the first time that the measurement of beta 2-microglobulin within 180 days after initiation of TDF predicts the development of TDF-related nephropathy.

5.2. Tenofovir Alafenamide

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a novel prodrug of TDF recently approved for the first-line treatment of HIV+ patients. It is approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as part of co-formulation and thus it is not available as single agent for the treatment of HIV infection. In the USA and Europe, TAF is usable as a stand-alone agent for treatment of chronic HBV infections. Studies comparing the pharmacokinetic properties of TAF and TDF have shown that TAF is able to reach a higher intracellular level in peripheral blood mononuclear cells than TDF, despite a lower concentration of the drug (about 90%) in the blood plasma [85,86,87]. Moreover, TAF has minimal mitochondrial toxicity compared to TDF in vivo studies [88]. Based on these findings, TAF-containing regimen leads to a more favorable renal and bone safety profile compared to TDF-containing regimen [89]. Two cases of TAF induced nephrotoxicity have been published to date, but it is difficult to ascribe the renal injury to TAF administration because more potential contributors were preexistent in those patients [90,91]. Further data are also necessary to evaluate the potential risk of TAF to induce Fanconi syndrome [92].

5.3. Protease Inhibitors

The protease inhibitors indinavir (IDV), lopinavir (LPV) and atazanavir (ATZ) have all been associated with renal stone formation [93]. IDV, an old drug responsible for significant formation of crystallization and stone formation in the urinary tract, is no longer used as antiretroviral therapy because has been replaced by newer drugs with a better side-effect profile [94].
Atazanavir is generally well tolerated and widely used with a boosting dose of ritonavir. Atazanavir has been associated with numerous case of crystalluria and nephrolithiasis [95]. Hamada et al. [96] found that ATZ had a hazard ratio of nephrolithiasis of 10.44 compared with other PI. ATZ withdrawal after the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis avoided new renal stone formation whereas continuum of the antiretroviral drug exposed the patients to recurrence of the disease [96]. Risk factors for calculi are dehydration, alkaline urine and a history of nephrolithiasis. Stones are radiolucent and are therefore not evident with abdomen X-rays [97].

5.4. Integrase Inhibitor

Raltegravir (RAL) and dolutegravir (DTG) are two antiretroviral drugs in the class of integrase inhibitors. According to recent WHO guidelines RAL and DTG are an alternative option to efavirenz for first-line ART [98]. Their renal effect is not insignificant as both drugs tend to increase serum creatinine concentration [99].
Metabolism of RAL occurs both in kidney and liver, but recommended dose remained unchanged in patients with CKD. Serum creatinine increase during the first 3–4 weeks of treatment without a tendency towards progression; a mean estimated creatinine clearance reduction of 5.4 mL/min was recorded after one year from its administration [100]. RAL causes an increase in serum creatinine without affecting tubular handling of creatinine. In fact, contrary to previous thinking, RAL does not block creatinine secretion through the inhibition of organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) as DTG [99]. The mechanism underlying renal dysfunction is unknown and there are no data about the reversibility of the phenomenon to date. The decrease of cystatin C-based estimated GFR [101] may suggest a potential detrimental effect of RAL on renal blood flow or interstitial compartment.
DTG does not need dose adjustment in CKD because it is excreted in urine for less than 1%. DTG augments plasma creatinine concentration thought inhibition of OCT2, a co-transporter of the basolateral side of proximal tubule cells responsible for urinary excretion of creatinine and drugs such as metformin and ranitidine. In this way, the unsecreted creatinine tends to increase in blood without an effective reduction of GFR due to drug-induced nephrotoxicity [102]. Similar to RAL, increase in serum creatinine level is not-progressive and occurs within the first four weeks of therapy [103]. The decline of CrCl is greater compared to RAL, 16.5 vs 5.4 mL/min at one year [100].

5.5. Cobicistat

The metabolism of cobicistat (COBI) is predominantly hepatic and dose adjustment is unnecessary in renal impairment. COBI has no antiviral activity against HIV. It acts, through inhibition of CYP3A, as a pharmaco-enhancer of atazanavir, darunavir or elvitegravir. This drug inhibits MATE1 (multidrug and toxin extruder protein1) a transporter located on the apical side of the proximal tubule responsible for the tubular excretion of creatinine. As a side effect, COBI increases serum creatinine levels and thus reduces eGFR without affecting true GFR [104].

6. Indirect Mechanism of Nephrotoxicity

About 50% of antiretroviral agents need dose adjustment in CKD. Inadequate dosing is common among CKD patients and it has been associated with treatment inefficacy, viral resistance and organ toxicity [105]. As recommended by FDA, drug dosing in renal dysfunction is based on creatinine clearance estimated by CG equations [9]. Unfortunately, this formula is inaccurate for extreme value of body weight and age. As a result, sarcopenia, malnutrition and ethnic differences impair true estimation of creatinine clearance and, thus, induce the physicians to make erroneous prescription of drugs. In this context, nuclear medicine techniques or 24-hour creatinine clearance [106] (for example, in low-income countries) may furnish valid support to dosing medications correctly.
Renal dysfunction can also result indirectly from drug interactions. The most common interactions in HIV-infected CKD patients occur principally with calcium channel blockers and statins. Drugs such as amlodipine, diltiazem, felodipine and nifedipine are metabolized by cytochrome P3A4, and as such their concentrations increase with concomitant administration of PIs, COBI (cytochrome inhibitors) and decrease with NNRTIs (cytochrome inducers).
Regarding statins, simvastatin and lovastatin, both metabolized via CYP3A4, and should be avoided for the risk of severe myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Fluvastatin, pitavastatin and pravastatin are preferable for their low potential of interactions. Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin are potent reducers of total LDL cholesterol, but their use is hindered by the moderate risk of drug-interactions and development of proteinuria, respectively [107].
Skeletal muscle involvement in HIV infection varies from asymptomatic muscle enzyme elevation to severe rhabdomyolysis. Zidovudine (ZDV) and abacavir may lead to myopathy, presumably through impairment of mitochondrial function. Rhabdomyolysis-induced AKI is a rare event and only few cases have been described in literature [108]. It occurs in patients with concomitant severe infection or in the context of substance abuse [109].
Didanosine (ddI), stavudine (d4T) and less frequently ZDV have been implicated in the pathogenesis of lactic acidosis. The mechanism underlying this condition is mediated by mitochondrial toxicity. Renal involvement manifests with acute renal failure, primarily due to prerenal causes (hypovolemia, reduced renal perfusion) [110].
ART determines a wide spectrum of metabolic alterations that may increase the occurrence of renal disease. All antiretroviral agents and protease inhibitors in particular are associated with cardiovascular disease that is mediated at least partly by dyslipidaemia [111]. Recently, the findings coming from a prospective cohort of the D:A:D study showed that darunavir, similar to the first-generation protease inhibitor, is associated with progressive increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Conversely, atazanavir lacks cardiovascular side effects [112].
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus rises constantly among PLWH with ART and is four times higher in infected patients with ART than in those uninfected [48]. Protease inhibitors and NRTIs are known to impair glucose tolerance, as well as predispose to frank diabetes mellitus. An increased rate of diabetic nephropathy has not been demonstrated but should be taken into account in case of albuminuria or proteinuria.
In addition, some antiretroviral agents affect lipid profile and increase the risk of renal vascular disease [113]. Drugs like NRTIs (i.e., ddI, d4T, ZDV) are well-known to induce hypertriglyceridemia, whereas NNRTIs, mainly efavirenz, predisposed to hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia. Abacavir instead increased the risk of cardiovascular diseases even in the absence of apparent lipid disorders [114].

7. Emerging Therapy

Doravirine (DOR) and bictegravir (BIC) are two novel antiretroviral agents recently approved by FDA for HIV treatment. Doravirine (DOR) is a recently approved NNRTI characterized by unique resistance profile, lack of food restriction and drug–drug interaction with antacids. DOR is a promising antiretroviral agent with the potential to become the first-line preferred regimen in naïve patients [115]. It does not require dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment nor when eGFR is less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 [116]. Bictegravir (BIC) is a newer INSTI acting without the need for a pharmacologic booster such as COBI or ritonavir (RTV). It is available only in the coformulation with TAF and emtricitabine (FTC). Since TAF an FTC need dose reduction in CKD this single-tablet regimen is not recommended in patients with moderate or severe CKD. The armamentarium of ART is expanding even with the use of biological therapies. Leronlimab (PRO 140) is a humanized antibody on the horizon. Target of leronlimab is CCR5, a receptor required for HIV-1 to enter macrophages, dendritic cells, and CD4 T-cells [117].
Regarding two-drug regimens, CKD patients with a suppressed viral load and no history of drug resistance have the opportunity to receive more tolerated and simpler maintenance therapy with DTG plus rilpivirine (RLP) compared to standard ART regimen [118]. More recently, the combination of DTG plus lamivudine (3TC) has been shown to be effective in treatment-naïve individuals [119].

8. Treatment of CKD

Treatment of CKD is based on blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and risk factor reduction. Diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, hyperuricemia, dyslipidemia and acidosis should be treated efficiently to prevent progression of renal disease. For patients who live in high-income countries and reach ESRD there are three options for treating uremia: hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation. Patients on dialysis with a suppressed VL have survival rates comparable to dialysis patients without HIV infection, and choice of dialysis modality does not change outcomes. In low-income area, peritoneal dialysis is an alternative RRT option for ESRD patients because it is characterized by limited cost compared to HD. However, future studies are necessary to evaluate its safety since a high rate of peritonitis has been found among PLWH [120,121]. Kidney transplantation is the better option for HIV-infected individuals with ESRD requiring RRT [122]. Apart from a high rate of graft rejection, outcome of kidney transplant recipients is now similar to the uninfected counterpart [123].
In low-income countries as in Africa, treatment of CKD is hindered by limited numbers of nephrologists, limited resources, poor access to RRT and a high prevalence of poverty [124]. Here, there is no treatment of ESRD because dialysis is highly expansive and consumes a large proportion of the health budget. For this reason, country such as South Africa, have rationalized access to RRT only for patients who are suitable for transplantation [125]. Surprisingly, the prevalence of PLWN among individuals presented for dialysis is low compared to the proportion of HIV-infected individuals in the general population. This unexpected difference is due to the restrictive criteria of this program, indeed patients with uncontrolled HIV replication have no access to RRT [125]. Based on these data, early diagnosis and management of HIV would reduce the burden of health care cost associated with treatment of CKD and increase the number of PLWH that can be considered for dialysis and transplantation. In view of the advanced nature of presentation and lack of dialysis facilities, greater efforts are necessary to prevent early CKD. Screening programs for early diagnosis of kidney disease are needed at HIV detection as well as concurrent screening for diabetes and hypertension.

9. Conclusions

HIV infection and CKD are two epidemic diseases with important social, clinical and economic implications. The interplay between these two diseases represents an interesting intersection between communicable and non-communicable diseases. Kidney disease and its associated risk factors are frequently found among HIV-infected patients, irrespective of the improvements with the use of ART, and it remains a cause of morbidity and mortality. The associated risk factors for kidney in this population include black race, older age, hypertension, diabetes, low CD4 T-cell count, and high viral load. The introduction of multi-drug combination therapy for the treatment of HIV has changed renal and overall outcome of PLWH over the last two decades.
In the ART era, renal involvement is due principally to the toxic effects of ART and the multiple comorbidities of PLWH, even though a potential cytopathic effect of the virus may be also expected during ART with viral suppression [126]. Since the prevalence of HIV infection is high, nephrologists and HIV specialists will more frequently face patients with a variable grade of renal insufficiency and inevitably on RRT. The goal of their integrated multidisciplinary approach relies on close monitoring of renal function, mitigating the adverse effects of polypharmacy and avoiding inappropriate drug prescriptions.

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed to the design and writing of this article. G.A. and G.C. in particular have drafted the article and other authors have contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Data and Statistics. Available online: http://www.who.int/hiv/data/en/ (accessed on 9 July 2019).
  2. Gueler, A.; Moser, A.; Calmy, A.; Günthard, H.F.; Bernasconi, E.; Furrer, H.; Fux, C.A.; Battegay, M.; Cavassini, M.; Vernazza, P.; et al. Life expectancy in HIV-positive persons in Switzerland: Matched comparison with general population. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2017, 31, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wu, P.-Y.; Hung, C.-C.; Liu, W.-C.; Hsieh, C.-Y.; Sun, H.-Y.; Lu, C.-L.; Wu, H.; Chien, K.-L. Metabolic syndrome among HIV-infected Taiwanese patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: Prevalence and associated factors. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Abraham, A.G.; Althoff, K.N.; Jing, Y.; Estrella, M.M.; Kitahata, M.M.; Wester, C.W.; Bosch, R.J.; Crane, H.; Eron, J.; Gill, M.J.; et al. End-stage renal disease among HIV-infected adults in North America. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2015, 60, 941–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schwartz, E.J.; Szczech, L.A.; Ross, M.J.; Klotman, M.E.; Winston, J.A.; Klotman, P.E. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and the epidemic of HIV+ end-stage renal disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 2005, 16, 2412–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yilma, D.; Abdissa, A.; Kæstel, P.; Tesfaye, M.; Olsen, M.F.; Girma, T.; Ritz, C.; Friis, H.; Andersen, Å.B.; Kirk, O. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rates in HIV positive and negative adults in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gagneux-Brunon, A.; Mariat, C.; Delanaye, P. Cystatin C in HIV-infected patients: Promising but not yet ready for prime time. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. Off. Publ. Eur. Dial. Transpl. Assoc.-Eur. Ren. Assoc. 2012, 27, 1305–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Levey, A.S.; Stevens, L.A. Estimating GFR Using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Creatinine Equation: More Accurate GFR Estimates, Lower CKD Prevalence Estimates, and Better Risk Predictions. Am. J. Kidney Dis. Off. J. Natl. Kidney Found. 2010, 55, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cockcroft, D.W.; Gault, M.H. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976, 16, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ekrikpo, U.E.; Kengne, A.P.; Bello, A.K.; Effa, E.E.; Noubiap, J.J.; Salako, B.L.; Rayner, B.L.; Remuzzi, G.; Okpechi, I.G. Chronic kidney disease in the global adult HIV-infected population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lucas, G.M.; Mehta, S.H.; Atta, M.G.; Kirk, G.D.; Galai, N.; Vlahov, D.; Moore, R.D. End-stage renal disease and chronic kidney disease in a cohort of African-American HIV-infected and at-risk HIV-seronegative participants followed between 1988 and 2004. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2007, 21, 2435–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bansi, L.; Hughes, A.; Bhagani, S.; Mackie, N.E.; Leen, C.; Levy, J.; Edwards, S.; Connolly, J.; Holt, S.G.; Hendry, B.M.; et al. Clinical epidemiology of HIV-associated end-stage renal failure in the UK. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2009, 23, 2517–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kazancioğlu, R. Risk factors for chronic kidney disease: An update. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2013, 3, 368–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mocroft, A.; Lundgren, J.D.; Ross, M.; Law, M.; Reiss, P.; Kirk, O.; Smith, C.; Wentworth, D.; Neuhaus, J.; Fux, C.A.; et al. Development and validation of a risk score for chronic kidney disease in HIV infection using prospective cohort data from the D:A:D study. PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bouatou, Y.; Gayet Ageron, A.; Bernasconi, E.; Battegay, M.; Hoffmann, M.; Staehelin, C.; Merz, L.; Kovari, H.; Fux, C.; de Seigneux, S.; et al. Lipodystrophy Increases the Risk of CKD Development in HIV-Positive Patients in Switzerland: The LIPOKID Study. Kidney Int. Rep. 2018, 3, 1089–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Lucas, G.M.; Lau, B.; Atta, M.G.; Fine, D.M.; Keruly, J.; Moore, R.D. Chronic Kidney Disease Incidence, and Progression to End-Stage Renal Disease, in HIV-Infected Individuals: A Tale of Two Races. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 197, 1548–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Althoff, K.N.; Gebo, K.A.; Moore, R.D.; Boyd, C.M.; Justice, A.C.; Wong, C.; Lucas, G.M.; Klein, M.B.; Kitahata, M.M.; Crane, H.; et al. Contributions of traditional and HIV-related risk factors on non-AIDS-defining cancer, myocardial infarction, and end-stage liver and renal diseases in adults with HIV in the USA and Canada: A collaboration of cohort studies. Lancet HIV 2019, 6, e93–e104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Collins, A.J.; Foley, R.N.; Chavers, B.; Gilbertson, D.; Herzog, C.; Johansen, K.; Kasiske, B.; Kutner, N.; Liu, J.; St Peter, W.; et al. United States Renal Data System 2011 Annual Data Report: Atlas of chronic kidney disease & end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am. J. Kidney Dis. Off. J. Natl. Kidney Found. 2012, 59, A7. [Google Scholar]
  19. Eggers, P.W.; Kimmel, P.L. Is there an epidemic of HIV Infection in the US ESRD program? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 2004, 15, 2477–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Levey, A.S.; Bosch, J.P.; Lewis, J.B.; Greene, T.; Rogers, N.; Roth, D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999, 130, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Freedman, B.I.; Limou, S.; Ma, L.; Kopp, J.B. APOL1-Associated Nephropathy: A Key Contributor to Racial Disparities in CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. Off. J. Natl. Kidney Found. 2018, 72, S8–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Purswani, M.U.; Patel, K.; Winkler, C.A.; Spector, S.A.; Hazra, R.; Seage, G.R.; Mofenson, L.; Karalius, B.; Scott, G.B.; Van Dyke, R.B.; et al. Brief Report: APOL1 Renal Risk Variants Are Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease in Children and Youth With Perinatal HIV Infection. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 1999 2016, 73, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Atta, M.G.; Estrella, M.M.; Skorecki, K.L.; Kopp, J.B.; Winkler, C.A.; Wasser, W.G.; Shemer, R.; Racusen, L.C.; Kuperman, M.; Foy, M.C.; et al. Association of APOL1 Genotype with Renal Histology among Black HIV-Positive Patients Undergoing Kidney Biopsy. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. CJASN 2016, 11, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ying, R.; Granich, R.M.; Gupta, S.; Williams, B.G. CD4 Cell Count: Declining Value for Antiretroviral Therapy Eligibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2016, 62, 1022–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Swanepoel, C.R.; Atta, M.G.; D’Agati, V.D.; Estrella, M.M.; Fogo, A.B.; Naicker, S.; Post, F.A.; Wearne, N.; Winkler, C.A.; Cheung, M.; et al. Kidney disease in the setting of HIV infection: Conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2018, 93, 545–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wyatt, C.M.; Klotman, P.E.; D’Agati, V.D. HIV-Associated Nephropathy: Clinical Presentation, Pathology, and Epidemiology in the Era of Antiretroviral Therapy. Semin. Nephrol. 2008, 28, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kopp, J.B.; Nelson, G.W.; Sampath, K.; Johnson, R.C.; Genovese, G.; An, P.; Friedman, D.; Briggs, W.; Dart, R.; Korbet, S.; et al. APOL1 genetic variants in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and HIV-associated nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 2011, 22, 2129–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kasembeli, A.N.; Duarte, R.; Ramsay, M.; Mosiane, P.; Dickens, C.; Dix-Peek, T.; Limou, S.; Sezgin, E.; Nelson, G.W.; Fogo, A.B.; et al. APOL1 Risk Variants Are Strongly Associated with HIV-Associated Nephropathy in Black South Africans. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 2015, 26, 2882–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Winston, J.A.; Klotman, M.E.; Klotman, P.E. HIV-associated nephropathy is a late, not early, manifestation of HIV-1 infection. Kidney Int. 1999, 55, 1036–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Anochie, I.C.; Eke, F.U.; Okpere, A.N. Human immunodeficiency virus-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) in Nigerian children. Pediatr. Nephrol. Berl. Ger. 2008, 23, 117–122. [Google Scholar]
  31. Appel, R.G.; Neill, J. A steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Ann. Intern. Med. 1990, 113, 892–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Smith, M.C.; Pawar, R.; Carey, J.T.; Graham, R.C.; Jacobs, G.H.; Menon, A.; Salata, R.A.; Seliga, R.; Kalayjian, R.C. Effect of corticosteroid therapy on human immunodeficiency virus-associated nephropathy. Am. J. Med. 1994, 97, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Briggs, W.A.; Tanawattanacharoen, S.; Choi, M.J.; Scheel, P.J.; Nadasdy, T.; Racusen, L. Clinicopathologic correlates of prednisone treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-associated nephropathy. Am. J. Kidney Dis. Off. J. Natl. Kidney Found. 1996, 28, 618–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mattana, J.; Siegal, F.P.; Schwarzwald, E.; Molho, L.; Sankaran, R.T.; Gooneratne, R.; Ahuja, T.S.; Singhal, P.C. AIDS-associated membranous nephropathy with advanced renal failure: Response to prednisone. Am. J. Kidney Dis. Off. J. Natl. Kidney Found. 1997, 30, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Eustace, J.A.; Nuermberger, E.; Choi, M.; Scheel, P.J.; Moore, R.; Briggs, W.A. Cohort study of the treatment of severe HIV-associated nephropathy with corticosteroids. Kidney Int. 2000, 58, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lucas, G.M.; Ross, M.J.; Stock, P.G.; Shlipak, M.G.; Wyatt, C.M.; Gupta, S.K.; Atta, M.G.; Wools-Kaloustian, K.K.; Pham, P.A.; Bruggeman, L.A.; et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of chronic kidney disease in patients infected with HIV: 2014 update by the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2014, 59, e96–e138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Walker, N.F.; Scriven, J.; Meintjes, G.; Wilkinson, R.J. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-infected patients. HIVAIDS Auckl. NZ 2015, 7, 49–64. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cohen, A.H.; Nast, C.C. HIV-associated nephropathy. A unique combined glomerular, tubular, and interstitial lesion. Mod. Pathol. 1988, 1, 87–97. [Google Scholar]
  39. Booth, J.W.; Hamzah, L.; Jose, S.; Horsfield, C.; O’Donnell, P.; McAdoo, S.; Kumar, E.A.; Turner-Stokes, T.; Khatib, N.; Das, P.; et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of HIV-associated immune complex kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2016, 31, 2099–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Alpers, C.E. Light at the end of the TUNEL: HIV-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Kidney Int. 2003, 63, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jehle, A.W.; Khanna, N.; Sigle, J.-P.; Glatz-Krieger, K.; Battegay, M.; Steiger, J.; Dickenmann, M.; Hirsch, H.H. Acute renal failure on immune reconstitution in an HIV-positive patient with miliary tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2004, 38, e32–e35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zafrani, L.; Coppo, P.; Dettwiler, S.; Molinier-Frenkel, V.; Agbalika, F.; Guiard-Schmid, J.-B.; Pialoux, G.; Xu-Dubois, Y.-C.; Rondeau, E.; Hertig, A. Nephropathy associated with the diffuse infiltrative lymphocytosis syndrome. Kidney Int. 2007, 72, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Libby, P.; Ridker, P.M.; Hansson, G.K. Leducq Transatlantic Network on Atherothrombosis Inflammation in atherosclerosis: From pathophysiology to practice. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 2129–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Idris, N.S.; Grobbee, D.E.; Burgner, D.; Cheung, M.M.H.; Kurniati, N.; Uiterwaal, C.S.P.M. Effects of paediatric HIV infection on childhood vasculature. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 3610–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ahmed, S. HIV associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Postgrad. Med. J. 2002, 78, 520–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cohen, S.D.; Kimmel, P.L. Immune Complex Renal Disease and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Semin. Nephrol. 2008, 28, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saab, K.R.; Elhadad, S.; Copertino, D.; Laurence, J. Thrombotic Microangiopathy in the Setting of HIV Infection: A Case Report and Review of the Differential Diagnosis and Therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2016, 30, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brown, T.T.; Cole, S.R.; Li, X.; Kingsley, L.A.; Palella, F.J.; Riddler, S.A.; Visscher, B.R.; Margolick, J.B.; Dobs, A.S. Antiretroviral therapy and the prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus in the multicenter AIDS cohort study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2005, 165, 1179–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pillay, S.; Aldous, C.; Mahomed, F. A deadly combination—HIV and diabetes mellitus: Where are we now? S. Afr. Med. J. Suid-Afr. Tydskr. Vir Geneeskd. 2016, 106, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mallipattu, S.K.; Liu, R.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, E.Y.; D’Agati, V.; Kaufman, L.; Ma’ayan, A.; Klotman, P.E.; Chuang, P.Y.; He, J.C. Expression of HIV transgene aggravates kidney injury in diabetic mice. Kidney Int. 2013, 83, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sax, P.E.; Gallant, J.E.; Klotman, P.E. Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. AIDS Read. 2007, 17, 90–92, 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nelson, M.R.; Katlama, C.; Montaner, J.S.; Cooper, D.A.; Gazzard, B.; Clotet, B.; Lazzarin, A.; Schewe, K.; Lange, J.; Wyatt, C.; et al. The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HIV infection in adults: The first 4 years. AIDS 2007, 21, 1273–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gallant, J.E.; Parish, M.A.; Keruly, J.C.; Moore, R.D. Changes in renal function associated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment, compared with nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2005, 40, 1194–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Winston, A.; Amin, J.; Mallon, P.; Marriott, D.; Carr, A.; Cooper, D.A.; Emery, S. Minor changes in calculated creatinine clearance and anion-gap are associated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy. HIV Med. 2006, 7, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Buchacz, K.; Young, B.; Baker, R.K.; Moorman, A.; Chmiel, J.S.; Wood, K.C.; Brooks, J.T. Renal function in patients receiving tenofovir with ritonavir/lopinavir or ritonavir/atazanavir in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) cohort. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 1999 2006, 43, 626–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fux, C.A.; Simcock, M.; Wolbers, M.; Bucher, H.C.; Hirschel, B.; Opravil, M.; Vernazza, P.; Cavassini, M.; Bernasconi, E.; Elzi, L.; et al. Tenofovir use is associated with a reduction in calculated glomerular filtration rates in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Antivir. Ther. 2007, 12, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar]
  57. Goicoechea, M.; Liu, S.; Best, B.; Sun, S.; Jain, S.; Kemper, C.; Witt, M.; Diamond, C.; Haubrich, R.; Louie, S.; et al. Greater tenofovir-associated renal function decline with protease inhibitor-based versus nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-based therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 197, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hall, A.M.; Hendry, B.M.; Nitsch, D.; Connolly, J.O. Tenofovir-associated kidney toxicity in HIV-infected patients: A review of the evidence. Am. J. Kidney Dis. Off. J. Natl. Kidney Found. 2011, 57, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cooper, R.D.; Wiebe, N.; Smith, N.; Keiser, P.; Naicker, S.; Tonelli, M. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Renal Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-Infected Patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 51, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gallant, J.E.; Staszewski, S.; Pozniak, A.L.; DeJesus, E.; Suleiman, J.M.A.H.; Miller, M.D.; Coakley, D.F.; Lu, B.; Toole, J.J.; Cheng, A.K.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir DF vs Stavudine in Combination Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients: A 3-Year Randomized Trial. JAMA 2004, 292, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gallant, J.E.; DeJesus, E.; Arribas, J.R.; Pozniak, A.L.; Gazzard, B.; Campo, R.E.; Lu, B.; McColl, D.; Chuck, S.; Enejosa, J.; et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lapadula, G.; Bernasconi, D.P.; Casari, S.; Maggiolo, F.; Cauda, R.; Pietro, M.D.; Ladisa, N.; Sighinolfi, L.; Zoppo, S.D.; Sabbatini, F.; et al. Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease among Patients Developing Mild Renal Impairment during Tenofovir-Containing Antiretroviral Treatment. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bickel, M.; Khaykin, P.; Stephan, C.; Schmidt, K.; Buettner, M.; Amann, K.; Lutz, T.; Gute, P.; Haberl, A.; Geiger, H.; et al. Acute kidney injury caused by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and diclofenac co-administration. HIV Med. 2013, 14, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Izzedine, H.; Hulot, J.S.; Vittecoq, D.; Gallant, J.E.; Staszewski, S.; Launay-Vacher, V.; Cheng, A.; Deray, G. Study 903 Team Long-term renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients. Data from a double-blind randomized active-controlled multicentre study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. Off. Publ. Eur. Dial. Transpl. Assoc.—Eur. Ren. Assoc. 2005, 20, 743–746. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jung, W.J.; Jang, J.Y.; Park, W.Y.; Jeong, S.W.; Lee, H.J.; Park, S.J.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.G.; Cha, S.-W.; Kim, Y.S.; et al. Effect of tenofovir on renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tourret, J.; Deray, G.; Isnard-Bagnis, C. Tenofovir Effect on the Kidneys of HIV-Infected Patients: A Double-Edged Sword? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 24, 1519–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Gallant, J.E.; Moore, R.D. Renal function with use of a tenofovir-containing initial antiretroviral regimen. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2009, 23, 1971–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Smith, R.L.; Tan, J.M.E.; Jonker, M.J.; Jongejan, A.; Buissink, T.; Veldhuijzen, S.; van Kampen, A.H.C.; Brul, S.; van der Spek, H. Beyond the polymerase-γ theory: Production of ROS as a mode of NRTI-induced mitochondrial toxicity. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Verhelst, D.; Monge, M.; Meynard, J.-L.; Fouqueray, B.; Mougenot, B.; Girard, P.-M.; Ronco, P.; Rossert, J. Fanconi syndrome and renal failure induced by tenofovir: A first case report. Am. J. Kidney Dis. Off. J. Natl. Kidney Found. 2002, 40, 1331–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. 16th CROI Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections Montreal, Canada; 8–11 February 2009 Tenofovir and PI Use Are Associated with an Increased Prevalence of Proximal Renal Tubular Dysfunction in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study: Boosted PI+TDF Associated with Renal Function. Available online: http://www.natap.org/2009/CROI/croi_144.htm (accessed on 6 January 2019).
  71. Fux, C.A.; Rauch, A.; Simcock, M.; Bucher, H.C.; Hirschel, B.; Opravil, M.; Vernazza, P.; Cavassini, M.; Bernasconi, E.; Elzi, L.; et al. Tenofovir use is associated with an increase in serum alkaline phosphatase in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Antivir. Ther. 2008, 13, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar]
  72. Grant, P.M.; Cotter, A.G. Tenofovir and Bone Health. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2016, 11, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Irizarry-Alvarado, J.M.; Dwyer, J.P.; Brumble, L.M.; Alvarez, S.; Mendez, J.C. Proximal tubular dysfunction associated with tenofovir and didanosine causing Fanconi syndrome and diabetes insipidus: A report of 3 cases. AIDS Read. 2009, 19, 114–121. [Google Scholar]
  74. Iwata, K.; Nagata, M.; Watanabe, S.; Nishi, S. Distal renal tubular acidosis without renal impairment after use of tenofovir: A case report. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2016, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mauss, S.; Berger, F.; Schmutz, G. Antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir is associated with mild renal dysfunction. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2005, 19, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jones, R.; Stebbing, J.; Nelson, M.; Moyle, G.; Bower, M.; Mandalia, S.; Gazzard, B. Renal dysfunction with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens is not observed more frequently: A cohort and case-control study. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 1999 2004, 37, 1489–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Young, B.; Buchacz, K.; Baker, R.K.; Moorman, A.C.; Wood, K.C.; Chmiel, J.; Brooks, J.T. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators Renal function in Tenofovir-exposed and Tenofovir-unexposed patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy in the HIV Outpatient Study. J. Int. Assoc. Physicians AIDS Care Chic. Ill 2002 2007, 6, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Herlitz, L.C.; Mohan, S.; Stokes, M.B.; Radhakrishnan, J.; D’Agati, V.D.; Markowitz, G.S. Tenofovir nephrotoxicity: Acute tubular necrosis with distinctive clinical, pathological, and mitochondrial abnormalities. Kidney Int. 2010, 78, 1171–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zimmermann, A.E.; Pizzoferrato, T.; Bedford, J.; Morris, A.; Hoffman, R.; Braden, G. Tenofovir-associated acute and chronic kidney disease: A case of multiple drug interactions. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2006, 42, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wever, K.; van Agtmael, M.A.; Carr, A. Incomplete reversibility of tenofovir-related renal toxicity in HIV-infected men. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 1999 2010, 55, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Moreno, S.; Domingo, P.; Palacios, R.; Santos, J.; Falcó, V.; Murillas, J.; Estrada, V.; Ena, J.; Alvarez, M.L. Recover Study Group Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV-1 treatment-experienced patients with adverse events related to prior NRTI use: Data from a prospective, observational, multicenter study. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 1999 2006, 42, 385–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV. Available online: https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines (accessed on 7 January 2019).
  83. Lisowska-Myjak, B. Serum and urinary biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Blood Purif. 2010, 29, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nishijima, T.; Kurosawa, T.; Tanaka, N.; Kawasaki, Y.; Kikuchi, Y.; Oka, S.; Gatanaga, H. Urinary β2 microglobulin can predict tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-related renal dysfunction in HIV-1-infected patients who initiate tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2016, 30, 1563–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lee, W.A.; He, G.-X.; Eisenberg, E.; Cihlar, T.; Swaminathan, S.; Mulato, A.; Cundy, K.C. Selective intracellular activation of a novel prodrug of the human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir leads to preferential distribution and accumulation in lymphatic tissue. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 1898–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ruane, P.J.; DeJesus, E.; Berger, D.; Markowitz, M.; Bredeek, U.F.; Callebaut, C.; Zhong, L.; Ramanathan, S.; Rhee, M.S.; Fordyce, M.W.; et al. Antiviral activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of tenofovir alafenamide as 10-day monotherapy in HIV-1-positive adults. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 1999 2013, 63, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ray, A.S.; Fordyce, M.W.; Hitchcock, M.J.M. Tenofovir alafenamide: A novel prodrug of tenofovir for the treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Antiviral Res. 2016, 125, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Stray, K.M.; Park, Y.; Babusis, D.; Callebaut, C.; Cihlar, T.; Ray, A.S.; Perron, M. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) does not deplete mitochondrial DNA in human T-cell lines at intracellular concentrations exceeding clinically relevant drug exposures. Antiviral Res. 2017, 140, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Arribas, J.R.; Thompson, M.; Sax, P.E.; Haas, B.; McDonald, C.; Wohl, D.A.; DeJesus, E.; Clarke, A.E.; Guo, S.; Wang, H.; et al. Brief Report: Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) vs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF), Each Coformulated With Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, and Emtricitabine (E/C/F) for Initial HIV-1 Treatment: Week 144 Results. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 1999 2017, 75, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bunnell, K.L.; Vibhakar, S.; Glowacki, R.C.; Gallagher, M.A.; Osei, A.M.; Huhn, G. Nephrotoxicity Associated with Concomitant Use of Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir and Tenofovir in a Patient with Hepatitis C Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection. Pharmacotherapy 2016, 36, e148–e153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Novick, T.K.; Choi, M.J.; Rosenberg, A.Z.; McMahon, B.A.; Fine, D.; Atta, M.G. Tenofovir alafenamide nephrotoxicity in an HIV-positive patient: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017, 96, e8046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bahr, N.C.; Yarlagadda, S.G. Fanconi Syndrome and Tenofovir Alafenamide: A Case Report. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019, 170, 814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Izzedine, H.; Lescure, F.X.; Bonnet, F. HIV medication-based urolithiasis. Clin. Kidney J. 2014, 7, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Viraben, R.; Aquilina, C. Indinavir-associated lipodystrophy. AIDS Lond. Engl. 1998, 12, F37–F39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tattevin, P.; Revest, M.; Chapplain, J.-M.; Ratajczak-Enselme, M.; Arvieux, C.; Michelet, C. Increased risk of renal stones in patients treated with atazanavir. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2013, 56, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hamada, Y.; Nishijima, T.; Watanabe, K.; Komatsu, H.; Tsukada, K.; Teruya, K.; Gatanaga, H.; Kikuchi, Y.; Oka, S. High incidence of renal stones among HIV-infected patients on ritonavir-boosted atazanavir than in those receiving other protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2012, 55, 1262–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Couzigou, C.; Daudon, M.; Meynard, J.L.; Lebas, F.B.; Higueret, D.; Escaut, L.; Zucman, D.; Liotier, J.-Y.; Quencez, J.-L.; Asselah, K.; et al. Urolithiasis in HIV-Positive Patients Treated with Atazanavir. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, e105–e108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. WHO. Updated Recommendations on First-Line and Second-Line Antiretroviral Regimens and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis and Recommendations on Early Infant Diagnosis of HIV: Interim Guidance; (WHO/CDS/HIV/18.18). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  99. Milburn, J.; Jones, R.; Levy, J.B. Renal effects of novel antiretroviral drugs. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. Off. Publ. Eur. Dial. Transpl. Assoc.—Eur. Ren. Assoc. 2017, 32, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Stellbrink, H.-J.; Reynes, J.; Lazzarin, A.; Voronin, E.; Pulido, F.; Felizarta, F.; Almond, S.; St Clair, M.; Flack, N.; Min, S.; et al. Dolutegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1: 96-week results from a randomized dose-ranging study. AIDS Lond. Engl. 2013, 27, 1771–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gupta, R.K.; Bang, T.J. Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) in Interventional Radiology Practice. Semin. Interv. Radiol. 2010, 27, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Koteff, J.; Borland, J.; Chen, S.; Song, I.; Peppercorn, A.; Koshiba, T.; Cannon, C.; Muster, H.; Piscitelli, S.C. A phase 1 study to evaluate the effect of dolutegravir on renal function via measurement of iohexol and para-aminohippurate clearance in healthy subjects. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013, 75, 990–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Raffi, F.; Rachlis, A.; Stellbrink, H.-J.; Hardy, W.D.; Torti, C.; Orkin, C.; Bloch, M.; Podzamczer, D.; Pokrovsky, V.; Pulido, F.; et al. Once-daily dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SPRING-2 study. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2013, 381, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Deeks, E.D. Cobicistat: A review of its use as a pharmacokinetic enhancer of atazanavir and darunavir in patients with HIV-1 infection. Drugs 2014, 74, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rastegar, D.A.; Knight, A.M.; Monolakis, J.S. Antiretroviral medication errors among hospitalized patients with HIV infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2006, 43, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Stevens, L.A.; Coresh, J.; Greene, T.; Levey, A.S. Assessing kidney function--measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 2473–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Eckard, A.R.; McComsey, G.A. The Role of Statins in the Setting of HIV Infection. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015, 12, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Koubar, S.H.; Estrella, M.M.; Warrier, R.; Moore, R.D.; Lucas, G.M.; Atta, M.G.; Fine, D.M. Rhabdomyolysis in an HIV cohort: Epidemiology, causes and outcomes. BMC Nephrol. 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Spiegel, L.R.; Schrier, P.B.; Shah, H.H. Severe recurrent rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury in a HIV-infected patient on antiretroviral therapy. Ren. Fail. 2013, 35, 1186–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Arenas-Pinto, A.; Grant, A.; Edwards, S.; Weller, I. Lactic acidosis in HIV infected patients: A systematic review of published cases. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2003, 79, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lundgren, J.; Mocroft, A.; Ryom, L. Contemporary protease inhibitors and cardiovascular risk. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 31, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ryom, L.; Lundgren, J.D.; El-Sadr, W.; Reiss, P.; Kirk, O.; Law, M.; Phillips, A.; Weber, R.; Fontas, E.; d’ Arminio Monforte, A.; et al. Cardiovascular disease and use of contemporary protease inhibitors: The D:A:D international prospective multicohort study. Lancet HIV 2018, 5, e291–e300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Riddler, S.A.; Smit, E.; Cole, S.R.; Li, R.; Chmiel, J.S.; Dobs, A.; Palella, F.; Visscher, B.; Evans, R.; Kingsley, L.A. Impact of HIV infection and HAART on serum lipids in men. JAMA 2003, 289, 2978–2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Llibre, J.M.; Hill, A. Abacavir and cardiovascular disease: A critical look at the data. Antiviral Res. 2016, 132, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Colombier, M.-A.; Molina, J.-M. Doravirine: A review. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2018, 13, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Effect Of Severe Renal Impairment On Doravirine Pharmacokinetics. CROI Conference. Available online: http://www.croiconference.org/sessions/effect-severe-renal-impairment-doravirine-pharmacokinetics (accessed on 7 July 2019).
  117. Kaplon, H.; Reichert, J.M. Antibodies to watch in 2019. MAbs 2019, 11, 219–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Llibre, J.M.; Hung, C.-C.; Brinson, C.; Castelli, F.; Girard, P.-M.; Kahl, L.P.; Blair, E.A.; Angelis, K.; Wynne, B.; Vandermeulen, K.; et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dolutegravir-rilpivirine for the maintenance of virological suppression in adults with HIV-1: Phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2018, 391, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Cahn, P.; Madero, J.S.; Arribas, J.R.; Antinori, A.; Ortiz, R.; Clarke, A.E.; Hung, C.-C.; Rockstroh, J.K.; Girard, P.-M.; Sievers, J.; et al. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2): Week 48 results from two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trials. The Lancet 2019, 393, 143–155. [Google Scholar]
  120. Schloth, T.; Genabe, I.; Pilgrim, W.; Jorden, A.; Fein, P.A.; Avram, M.M. Peritonitis and the patient with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Adv. Perit. Dial. Conf. Perit. Dial. 1992, 8, 250–252. [Google Scholar]
  121. Dressler, R.; Peters, A.T.; Lynn, R.I. Pseudomonal and candidal peritonitis as a complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Am. J. Med. 1989, 86, 787–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Locke, J.E.; Gustafson, S.; Mehta, S.; Reed, R.D.; Shelton, B.; MacLennan, P.A.; Durand, C.; Snyder, J.; Salkowski, N.; Massie, A.; et al. Survival Benefit of Kidney Transplantation in HIV-Infected Patients. Ann. Surg. 2017, 265, 604–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Locke, J.E.; Mehta, S.; Reed, R.D.; MacLennan, P.; Massie, A.; Nellore, A.; Durand, C.; Segev, D.L. A National Study of Outcomes among HIV-Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 2015, 26, 2222–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Wearne, N.; Okpechi, I.G.; Swanepoel, C.R. Nephrology in South Africa: Not Yet ubuntu. Kidney Dis. Basel Switz. 2019, 5, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  125. Kilonzo, K.G.; Jones, E.S.W.; Okpechi, I.G.; Wearne, N.; Barday, Z.; Swanepoel, C.R.; Yeates, K.; Rayner, B.L. Disparities in dialysis allocation: An audit from the new South Africa. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Canaud, G.; Dejucq-Rainsford, N.; Avettand-Fenoël, V.; Viard, J.-P.; Anglicheau, D.; Bienaimé, F.; Muorah, M.; Galmiche, L.; Gribouval, O.; Noël, L.-H.; et al. The kidney as a reservoir for HIV-1 after renal transplantation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 2014, 25, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 08 01254 g001 550
Figure 1. A schematic view of the nephron (functional unit of the kidney) and potential HIV involvement. Glomerular involvement has been described in HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) (collapsing glomerulopathy); focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), not otherwise specified; immune complex kidney disease. Tubulointerstitial involvement has been described as tubulointerstitial-dominant HIV-related diseases or secondary to antiretroviral agents that may cause direct renal injury manifesting with tubular dysfunction, acute interstitial nephritis and renal calculi. Vascular involvement called vascular-dominant HIV-related diseases such as thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) syndrome, porpora thrombocytopenic (TTP), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) have also been reported.
Figure 1. A schematic view of the nephron (functional unit of the kidney) and potential HIV involvement. Glomerular involvement has been described in HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) (collapsing glomerulopathy); focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), not otherwise specified; immune complex kidney disease. Tubulointerstitial involvement has been described as tubulointerstitial-dominant HIV-related diseases or secondary to antiretroviral agents that may cause direct renal injury manifesting with tubular dysfunction, acute interstitial nephritis and renal calculi. Vascular involvement called vascular-dominant HIV-related diseases such as thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) syndrome, porpora thrombocytopenic (TTP), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) have also been reported.
Jcm 08 01254 g001
Table
Table 1. Classification of HIV-related kidney disease and description of their treatment. Adapted from Swanepoel CR et al. “Kidney disease in the setting of HIV infection: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference” Kidney Int. 2018;93(3):545–559 (see reference [25]).
Table 1. Classification of HIV-related kidney disease and description of their treatment. Adapted from Swanepoel CR et al. “Kidney disease in the setting of HIV infection: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference” Kidney Int. 2018;93(3):545–559 (see reference [25]).
HIV-Related Kidney DiseaseDirectly Related to HIV InfectionFirst-Line Treatment *Second-Line TreatmentAdjunctive Therapies
I. Glomerular-dominant
a. Podocytopaties (e.g. HIVAN, FSGS) XARTSteroid, Cys AACEi or ARB
b. Immune complex-mediated glomerular disease (e.g. MPGN, IgAN) ARTSteroidACEi or ARB
II. Tubulointerstitial-dominant
a. Tubulointerstitial injury in the setting of classic HIVAN XARTSteroid
b. Acute tubular injury or acute tubular necrosis (associated with ART) Stop offending drug
c. Drug-induced tubulointerstitial nephritis (other than ART) Stop offending drugSteroid
d. Direct renal parenchymal infection by pathogens Treat the underling infection
e. Imuunologic dysfunction-related tubulointerstitial inflammation
  • DILS
  • IRIS
  • ART
  • Treat the opportunistic infection/ART
  • Steroid
  • Steroid
II. NSAID (risk of nephrotoxicity), thalidomide, hydroxychloroquine, anti-TNFalpha
f. Other tubulointerstitial inflammation in the setting of HIV Treat underlining disease
III. Vascular-dominant
a. Thrombotic microangiopathy in the setting of HIV
  • TTP
  • aHUS
  • X
  • X
  • ART, plasmapheresis
  • ART, Eculizumab
I. Rituximab, bortezomib, Cys AI. Sterodi/antiplatelet agents
b. Arteriosclerosis X §ART/reduce risk factors for atherosclerosis
IV. Other, in the setting of HIV
a. Diabetic nephrolopathy Treat diabetesACEi or ARB
b. Age-related nephrosclerosis ARTART/reduce risk factors for atherosclerosis
Anti TNF-α, anti-tumor necrosis factor-α; ART, antiretroviral therapy; Cys A, Cyclosporine A; DILS, diffuse infiltrative lymphocytosis syndrome, FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; HIVAN, HIV-associated nephropathy; IgAN, IgA nephropathy; IRIS, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; § Arteriosclerosis is due partly to cytopathic effect of HIV and to the traditional and non-traditional risk factors for vasculopathy; * According to current guidelines, ART is administered in all patients with the diagnosis of HIV infection regardless CD4 T-cell count. ART is indicated as the first-line approach when it is effective in the treatment of HIV-related kidney diseases.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alfano, G.; Cappelli, G.; Fontana, F.; Di Lullo, L.; Di Iorio, B.; Bellasi, A.; Guaraldi, G. Kidney Disease in HIV Infection. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081254

AMA Style

Alfano G, Cappelli G, Fontana F, Di Lullo L, Di Iorio B, Bellasi A, Guaraldi G. Kidney Disease in HIV Infection. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8(8):1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alfano, Gaetano, Gianni Cappelli, Francesco Fontana, Luca Di Lullo, Biagio Di Iorio, Antonio Bellasi, and Giovanni Guaraldi. 2019. "Kidney Disease in HIV Infection" Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 8: 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081254

APA Style

Alfano, G., Cappelli, G., Fontana, F., Di Lullo, L., Di Iorio, B., Bellasi, A., & Guaraldi, G. (2019). Kidney Disease in HIV Infection. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(8), 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop