Next Article in Journal
Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Dispelling Myths about Antenatal TAPS: A Call for Action for Routine MCA-PSV Doppler Screening in the United States
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association between Interleukin-6 Levels and Perioperative Fatigue in Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients
Open AccessArticle

Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy–Surgical Technique and Results

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine–University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(7), 978; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070978
Received: 18 June 2019 / Accepted: 4 July 2019 / Published: 5 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer)
  |  
PDF [3273 KB, uploaded 5 July 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Background: Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) has been proven to be superior when compared with open esophagectomy, with a significant reduction of postoperative morbidity. In HMIE, the laparotomy is replaced by a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach. The radical mediastinal resection plus reconstruction is performed by a thoracic approach through a muscle-sparing thoracotomy. In this instructional article, we describe the surgical technique of HMIE in detail in order to facilitate possible adoption of the procedure by other surgeons. In addition, we give the monocentric results of our own practice. Methods: Between 2013 and 2018, HMIE was performed in 157 patients. The morbidity and mortality data of the procedure is shown in a retrospective monocentric analysis. Results: Overall, 54% of patients had at least one perioperative complication. Anastomotic leak was evident in 1.9%, and a single patient had focal conduit necrosis of the gastric pull-up. Postoperative pulmonary morbidity was 31%. Pneumonia was found in 17%. The 90 day mortality was 2.5%. Wound infection rate was 3%, and delayed gastric emptying occurred in 17% of patients. In follow up, 12.7% presented with diaphragmatic herniation of the bowel, requiring laparoscopic hernia reduction and hiatal reconstruction and colopexy several months after surgery. Conclusion: HMIE is a highly reliable technique, not only for the resection part but especially in terms of safety in reconstruction and anastomosis. For esophageal surgeons with experience in minimally invasive anti-reflux procedures and obesity surgery, HMIE is easy and fast to learn and adopt. View Full-Text
Keywords: esophagectomy; minimally invasive surgery; hybrid procedures; esophageal cancer; surgical technique esophagectomy; minimally invasive surgery; hybrid procedures; esophageal cancer; surgical technique
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuvendjiska, J.; Marjanovic, G.; Glatz, T.; Kulemann, B.; Hoeppner, J. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy–Surgical Technique and Results. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 978.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Clin. Med. EISSN 2077-0383 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top