Next Article in Journal
Sick Leave and Factors Influencing Sick Leave in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Rational Combinations of Targeted Agents in AML
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Effects of T-Cell Depletion on Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes in AML Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 4
Issue 4
10.3390/jcm4040504
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Potential of Vitamin D-Regulated Intracellular Signaling Pathways as Targets for Myeloid Leukemia Therapy

by
Elzbieta Gocek
1 and
George P. Studzinski
2,*
1
Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wroclaw, Joliot-Curie 14a, Wroclaw 50-383, Poland
2
Department of Pathology, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 185 South Orange Ave., Newark, NJ 17101, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2015, 4(4), 504-534; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm4040504
Submission received: 20 September 2014 / Revised: 6 January 2015 / Accepted: 6 March 2015 / Published: 25 March 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AML in the Molecular Age: From Biology to Clinical Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The current standard regimens for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are curative in less than half of patients; therefore, there is a great need for innovative new approaches to this problem. One approach is to target new treatments to the pathways that are instrumental to cell growth and survival with drugs that are less harmful to normal cells than to neoplastic cells. In this review, we focus on the MAPK family of signaling pathways and those that are known to, or potentially can, interact with MAPKs, such as PI3K/AKT/FOXO and JAK/STAT. We exemplify the recent studies in this field with specific relevance to vitamin D and its derivatives, since they have featured prominently in recent scientific literature as having anti-cancer properties. Since microRNAs also are known to be regulated by activated vitamin D, this is also briefly discussed here, as are the implications of the emerging acquisition of transcriptosome data and potentiation of the biological effects of vitamin D by other compounds. While there are ongoing clinical trials of various compounds that affect signaling pathways, more studies are needed to establish the clinical utility of vitamin D in the treatment of cancer.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cytotoxic therapy can be quite successful in the control of the growth and dissemination of many human malignant diseases, but the established treatment regimens appear to have reached a plateau in their potential for improvement. Therefore, encouraged by the success of Imatinib mesylate, also known as Gleevec, in producing long-lasting remissions of CML by targeting the fusion gene Bcr-Abl with tyrosine kinase activity [1,2,3,4] and of ATRA, which targets a fusion TF PML-RARα in acute promyelocytic subtype M3 of AML (APL) [5,6,7,8,9,10], the search is on for similar targeting of other neoplastic diseases. Derivatives of vitamin D (VDD) have been suggested to have anti-neoplastic properties, but the translation of the results of epidemiological and laboratory studies to the clinic has so far not been successful [11,12,13,14]. In this review, we discuss the background for seeking molecular targets related to signaling pathways that current knowledge suggests have the potential for the exploration of their clinical usefulness in subtypes of AML other than CML and APL. While several excellent reviews have been published recently that overlap with this one [15,16,17,18], our aim is to update this knowledge, as well as to focus on several selected aspects of the vitamin D and human leukemia field that we feel deserve additional emphasis.

2. Signaling Pathways Studied in Hematopoietic and Myeloid Cells

AML is a predominant acute leukemia among adults and constitutes a very heterogeneous group of blood and bone marrow neoplasms [19,20,21]. AML is an aggressive disease characterized by over 20% of myeloblasts circulating in the blood or/and bone marrow [20,22,23,24]. Blast cells are characterized by inhibited differentiation, as well as increased proliferation. Moreover, AML have specific cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities [25]. There are more than two hundred described chromosomal aberrations in leukemic cells of patients with AML [26,27], but also a large group of AMLs without detectable cytogenetic abnormalities [20,28].
Despite significant improvements in chemotherapeutic regimens, poor responsiveness and relapse are still problems in a significant number of patients diagnosed with AML. The clinical outcome with chemotherapy alone is still abysmal for many myeloid leukemia patients, so the development of precision therapy, also called “targeted” therapy, for AML patients based on the molecular features remains an essential aim. Therefore, there is a great need for new therapies with better tolerability and effectiveness than the current treatments. As mentioned above, APL was the first hematological malignancy in which targeted therapy with ATRA has been successfully introduced into clinical practice and induces cell differentiation and death of blast cells [29,30,31]. Another compound capable of inducing differentiation of AML cells is 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D), which induces monocyte/macrophage-like differentiation and cell cycle arrest [32,33,34,35,36]. The importance of understanding the signaling pathways disturbed in AML cells may improve current treatments and may supplement the conventional therapeutic regimens.

2.1. MAP Kinase Signaling

The MAPKs constitute a family of serine-threonine kinases regulating the proliferation and differentiation of normal and malignant hematopoietic cells [37,38]. MAPKs signal by four main cascades: the ERK1/2, the JNKs, the p38 kinases and ERK5 kinase [37,39] (Figure 1). There are multiple interactions between these pathways, including cooperation and cross-talk between various components, in order to transmit specific signals to the cell [40,41,42,43].
MAPKs transduce signals into the cell through a three-tiered cascade, from MAP3Ks (such as Raf1, Cot1, MTK/DLK or ASK1/TAK1/PTK1) through MAP2Ks (such as MEK1/2, MEK5, MKK7/MEK4 or MEK3/6) to MAPKs (ERK1/2, ERK5, JNKs, p38 kinases). Terminally, MAPKs activate several TFs (like c-Fos, c-Jun, PU.1, MEF2, ATF2, c-Myc and Sp1), activating genes responsible for proliferation, differentiation and cell death.
Jcm 04 00504 g001 1024
Figure 1. MAPK signaling pathways.
Figure 1. MAPK signaling pathways.
Jcm 04 00504 g001

2.1.1. MEK1/2-ERK1/2 Pathway

The ERK1/2 cascade is activated by several reactions initiated by extracellular signals and transmitted by growth factor receptors and cytokine receptors to the small G-coupled protein Ras1 [44], which can sequentially activate Raf1, MEK1/2 and, then, ERK1/2 kinases (Figure 1). When activated by MEK 1/2 phosphorylation, ERK1 and ERK2 are translocated to the nucleus and, in turn, phosphorylate transcription factors crucial for myeloid differentiation, such as C/EBPα, C/EBPβ or PU.1 [45,46,47]. Kinase suppressor of Ras 1 and 2 (KSR1 and KSR2), considered to be scaffold proteins that bring Ras1, Raf1 and MEK1/2 together, facilitate signaling through pathways mediated by ERK1/2 [48,49,50,51]. ERK1/2 have been shown to phosphorylate several different substrates, including ribosomal S6 kinase p90RSK [52]. The Ras1-Raf1-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway is an important positive regulator of monocytic and granulocytic differentiation [38,53,54].

2.1.2. JNKs Pathway

The JNKs family is made up of three members: JNK1, JNK2 and JNK3 [55,56,57]. These kinases are activated by external stress, apoptotic stimuli and cytokines and are also known as SAPK (stress-activated protein kinases). These signals lead to their phosphorylation by upstream kinases (MEK4, MKK7) [58]. Although JNK1 and JNK2 have somewhat different actions on AML, in general, JNKs phosphorylate TFs, such as c-Jun, ATF-2, p53 and Elk-1, which, in turn, regulate the expression of specific genes to mediate cell proliferation, differentiation or apoptosis [59,60] (Figure 1). C-Jun is essential for monocytic differentiation of human AML cells, as a part of the AP1 TF [53,61].

2.1.3. p38 Kinases Pathway

The p38 MAPKs are activated in cells by environmental stresses and pro-inflammatory cytokines, less often by growth factors. There are four members of the p38 MAPKs family, α, β, γ and δ, which display tissue-specific patterns of expression [62]. p38α and β, the “classical” isoforms, are ubiquitously expressed among tissues, whereas the expression of p38γ and δ appears to be more tissue restricted and, in 1,25D-treated AML cells, have positive effects of differentiation, unlike the classical isoforms [41,63,64,65,66]. The p38 kinases share about 40% sequence identity with other MAPKs, but they share only about 60% identity among themselves, which suggests highly diverse functions [67,68,69]. The p38 MAPKs are activated by phosphorylation by upstream kinases MKK3 and MKK6, although MKK4, the main activator of JNKs, has also been shown to activate p38 MAPKs [70]. Upon activation, p38 proteins translocate from the cytosol to the nucleus, where they orchestrate cellular responses by mediating phosphorylation of downstream targets that regulate apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, cell growth inhibition and differentiation [41,71,72] (Figure 1). Besides transcription factors, p38 kinases downstream targets are other kinases, such as MAPKAPK3 or MAPKAPK5 [65,73].

2.1.4. MEK5-ERK5-MEF2C Pathway

Like the other branches of the MAPK family, the MEK5/ERK5 pathway has been implicated in cell survival, anti-apoptotic signaling, angiogenesis, cell motility, proliferation and cell differentiation [74]. However, ERK5 signaling can have both overlapping and distinct effects from the other MAPKs [75].
The principal activator of ERK5 is MEK5, which can be activated by MAP2Ks, such as MEKK2 and MEKK3 [76,77]. It has been shown that MEKK3 induces activation of the MEK5/ERK5 pathways through growth factor-induced cellular stimulation and oxidative stress [76,78] (Figure 1). ERK5 is activated by two phosphorylations: first, on the N-terminal TEY sequence, usually by MEK5 [79], and then by autophosphorylation on the ERK5 C-terminal transcriptional activation domain [80,81], which allows it to be translocated into the nucleus and to activate several TFs, including MEF2, Sap1, c-Fos and c-Myc [79,82,83,84]. The auto-phosphorylation of the ERK5 C-terminus may also be required for transcriptional activation [85]. The Cot1 oncogene can activate ERK5 [86,87] and can repress KSR1/2 [42,87].

2.2. PI3 Kinase-Akt1-mTOR Signaling

PI3Ks control the growth, motility, survival and differentiation of many normal and cancer cells [88,89,90]. The PI3Ks family is composed of heterodimeric proteins grouped into three main classes: I (IA and IB), II and III. Class IA enzymes are composed of three distinct catalytic subunits (p110α, p110β or p110δ), which associate with one of the regulatory subunits (p85α, p85β, p55α, p55γ or p50α) [91,92]. Class IB enzymes encompass one catalytic subunits (p110 γ) and two regulatory subunits (p101 or p87) [93]. Notably, p110α and p110β are ubiquitously expressed in most types of cells, whilst p110δ and p110γ are exclusively expressed in hematopoietic cells [92,94,95]. RTKs, non-RTKs, GPCRs and Ras1 are direct activators of class IA PI3Ks, whereas class IB enzymes are activated only by GPCRs and Ras1 [96,97]. Upon activation, the regulatory subunit mediates binding to the receptor, whereas the catalytic subunit phosphorylates PIP2 to yield PIP3. PIP3 initiates downstream signaling, such as the PDK1, Akt1, mTOR or FOXO family of TFs [98,99,100,101] (Figure 2). Direct constitutive activation of PI3K/Akt1/mTOR signaling occurs in the majority of leukemias, such as AML and ALL, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, lymphoproliferative disorders or myeloproliferative neoplasms [102,103,104].
Jcm 04 00504 g002 1024
Figure 2. FLT3/PI3 kinase/Akt1/mTOR signaling pathways.
Figure 2. FLT3/PI3 kinase/Akt1/mTOR signaling pathways.
Jcm 04 00504 g002
After ligand (L) binding, FLT3 is phosphorylated (yellow circles), at TKD, and activates downstream pathways, such as PI3K/Akt1, MAPKs (MEK1/2, ERK 1/2) and STAT5. Two major classes of activating FLT3 mutations have been identified in AML patients: ITD and TKD point mutations. Mutations cause constitutive activation of FLT3 and aberrant activation of downstream signaling pathways and factor-independent growth. PI3K is activated downstream of RTKs, non-RTKs or GPCRs. Ras1 is a direct activator of class IA of PI3Ks, upon activation regulatory subunit (RSU) mediating the binding to the receptor, whereas the catalytic subunit (CSU) phosphorylates PIP2 to PIP3. PIP3 initiates downstream signaling, PDK1, Akt1, mTOR or FOXO.

2.3. FLT3 Signaling

FLT3 is encoded by a gene located on chromosome 13 and plays an important role in early hematopoiesis and development of myeloid precursors [105,106]. This transmembrane kinase belongs to the class III receptor tyrosine kinase family and is the most commonly mutated in AML [107,108,109]. The oncogenic mutations in FLT3 (ITD, internal tandem duplication in the juxtamembrane region or point mutation in the catalytic domain) cause ligand-independent dimerization of the FLT3 and its constitutive activation. Thus, the mutated FLT3 receptor activates downstream signaling pathways, such as PI3K, ERK1/2 and p38, LYN and STAT5 kinases, leading to the cytokine-independent proliferation (Figure 2) [109,110,111,112].

2.4. C/EBPα Signaling

The C/EBPα belongs to the family of basic leucine zipper TFs, which participate in the differentiation of several cell types, including myeloid progenitor cells from multipotent precursors [113,114,115]. There are two distinct isoforms of C/EBPα protein, full-length p42 and truncated p30, which lacks two N-terminal trans-activation domains [116]. Only the p42 isoform of C/EBPα can inhibit cell proliferation, while the p30 isoform can support the formation of granulocyte-macrophage progenitors in mice and can lead to the development of AML in the absence of p42 [117]. The relative levels of p42 and p30 in the cell can be regulated through mTOR signaling to control the transition of cell fate [118]. A genetic knockout of C/EBPα results in a complete block in the transition from common myeloid progenitors to the granulocyte/monocyte progenitor stage of differentiation [119]. Mutations in CEBPα occur in approximately 5% to 10% of de novo AML and is most common in cytogenetically normal AMLs [114,120].

2.5. Targeting by MicroRNAs

MicroRNAs are small, noncoding and highly conserved RNA molecules that regulate the expression of genes post-transcriptionally by binding to the 3′-UTR regions of the mRNA [121,122,123]. Several microRNAs are widely expressed in hematopoietic cells (i.e., 106a, 128a, 146, 150, 155, 181a, 221, 222, 223), and their altered expression (e.g., by chromosomal translocations) has been correlated with leukemia [124]. Several studies have shown that specific patterns of microRNA expression are closely associated with cytogenetic and risk/survival predictions in AML patients [125,126,127,128]. Importantly, integration of microRNA and mRNA patterns of regulation can reveal the extent of co-regulation, which permits exquisite control of gene expression at the mRNA level [129,130].

2.6. Global Effects of VDDs on AML Cells

Most studies of signaling by VDDs were based on the examination of the expression of a single or a small number of genes. However, powerful new technology is evolving, which, combined with bioinformatics, is poised to transform this field. Therefore, the question can soon be answered of how the perturbations of cellular homeostasis by 1,25D or other VDDs influence the global gene expression. Interesting examples of this approach have recently been published by the Carsten group, which include a genome-wide analysis of VDR binding sites in THP-1 human monocytic leukemia cells. They identified by ChIP-seq 2340 VDR binding locations, of which 1171 occurred uniquely following short exposure to 1,25D and 520 without exposure to 1,25D [131]. Interestingly, it was found that 1,25D binding shifts the locations of VDR occupation to DR3-type response elements that surround its target genes, and there was a large variety of regulatory constellations of VDR binding sites. It is also becoming increasingly clear that VDR binding choices are highly specific for the cell type [130,131,132]. The biological significance may be derived from microarray analyses following 1,25D treatment, such as that which found that the monocytic marker CD14 and cathelicidin anti-microbial peptide were by far the most markedly upregulated genes in this scenario [131]. Among the genes upregulated early, as shown by the microarray analysis, the monocyte-specific genes and metabolism-related genes are two noticeable groups [132]. The effects of longer exposure to 1,25D include the finding that VDR binding sites are significantly enriched near autoimmune and cancer-associated genes identified from GWA studies [133]. Thus, GWA surveys can lead to deeper understanding of signaling by VDDs.

3. 1,25D as an Important Modifier of Signaling Pathways Disturbed in AML

1,25D is the physiological form of vitamin D that belongs to the family of secosteroid hormones [134,135]. Although the primary function of 1,25D is to maintain calcium and phosphorus metabolism [136], 1,25D is capable of inducing differentiation and inhibiting the proliferation of several types of normal and cancer cells, AML cells among them [137,138,139]. Exposure of AML cells to 1,25D results in a monocyte-like phenotype, which, upon prolonged exposure to 1,25D, becomes a macrophage-like phenotype, manifested by functional changes (phagocytosis accompanied by monocyte-specific esterase activity and the generation of reactive oxygen species). The phenotypic changes include altered morphology [140,141] and the expression of a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharides, CD14, and the adherence protein encoding the subunit of αMβ2-integrin, CD11b [142,143,144,145].
There are several phases of 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells. In the initial phase, the cells continue normal proliferation and cell cycle progression. During this phase, high levels of MEK1/2, ERK1/2, JNKs and p38 kinases are essential [53,146,147]. Latter phases lead to the cell cycle block at the G1/S phase due to the elevated expression of CDK inhibitors, such as p21Cip1/Waf1 and p27Kip1 [148,149,150], and anti-apoptotic proteins, including Bcl-XL and Mcl1, which facilitate differentiation by increasing cell survival [151,152].

3.1. Activation of MAPKs by 1,25D

3.1.1. Ras1-Raf1-MEK1/2-ERK1/2

The ERK1/2 signaling pathway maintains cell proliferation during the early stages of 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells (24–48 h). ERK1/2 are expressed at a high level and are activated by phosphorylation [53,146]. PD98059, the specific inhibitor of MEK1/2 [153], partially inhibits 1,25D-induced monocytic differentiation of HL60 cells. At the later phase, a high level of phosphorylated ERK1/2 decreases to the basal level, and then, ribosomal S6 kinase p90RSK is activated [53,146,147]. This kinase, in turn, can activate C/EBPβ, the master TF for monocyte/macrophage differentiation [154,155]. C/EBPβ, which can be activated by phosphorylation by ERK1/2 [156], by p90RSK [157] or by ERK5 [141] and can directly interact with the promoter region of CD14, activates its expression [45,156,158].
Raf1 signaling is a requisite for the latter stages of 1,25D-induced differentiation of HL60 cells. Raf1 mediates activation of p90RSK, but independently of the MEK1/2-ERK1/2 module [45]. Moreover, a platform for Raf1 phosphorylation, KSR1 and KSR2 [159] are also upregulated by 1,25D, augmenting the strength of the signal transmitted through Raf1 to downstream targets [49,160,161] (Figure 3). KSR2 knockdown decreases cell survival, which is accompanied by reduced Bcl-2/Bax and Bcl-2/Bad ratios and increased caspase-3 activating cleavage [162].
Jcm 04 00504 g003 1024
Figure 3. 1,25D’s influence on MAPK signaling.
Figure 3. 1,25D’s influence on MAPK signaling.
Jcm 04 00504 g003
1,25D activates several MAPKs, such as MLK3, Cot1 and MEK1/2. The ERK1/2, ERK5 and JNK (JNK1/2) pathways have positive effects on monocytic differentiation, while the p38 MAPKs pathway may have a dual effect on differentiation. p38α and p38β have an inhibitory effect on monocytic, but not granulocytic differentiation of HL60 cells, while p38γ and δ may positively modulate monocytic differentiation of these cells. 1,25D can amplify the Raf1-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway by direct transcriptional upregulation of KSR1 and KSR2, which act as scaffolds that coordinate signaling along the Ras1/ERK1/2 signaling. Also shown is the potential role of the C/EBPβ, c-Jun/ATF2 and PU.1/Sp1 TFs, which act as positive effectors of 1,25D signals by upregulating the expression of VDR, CD14 and CD11b.

3.1.2. JNKs

During 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells, the expression level of JNK1 is highly elevated [147]. JNK1 activates c-Jun and ATF2, two major components of the AP-1 TF complex, as well as C/EBPβ and Jun B [61]. Moreover, the expression level of c-Jun is also elevated in those cells [163], which enhances the differentiation process [164]. Inhibition of JNK1/2 by the specific inhibitor, SP600125 [165], leads to the reduction of c-Jun and ATF2 phosphorylation, as well as to the decreased expression of Egr-1 and c-Fos, which results in the differentiation block [147,166,167]. Importantly, in AML cells resistant to 1,25D, JNK2 antagonizes JNK1 and is considered, at least in part, a negative regulator of the cell proliferation and resistance of those cells [168,169] (Figure 3).

3.1.3. MAPK/p38 Kinases

The p38 kinases are also essential for 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells. It was shown that some functions generally attributed to p38 kinases, such as inhibition of 1,25D-induced differentiation [66], are only performed by the classical forms (p38α and p38β), as these, unlike p38γ and δ, are inhibited by SB203580, SB202190 and related compounds [66,170,171,172,173]. Because they exert a negative feedback upstream of p38α and p38, the isoforms p38γ and p38δ actually have a positive effect on 1,25D-induced differentiation of human AML cells [66] (Figure 3). Moreover, the inhibition of p38α and p38β leads to an upregulated expression of isoforms p38γ and p38δ in 1,25D-treated AML cell lines and in primary cultures [66].

3.1.4. MEK5-ERK5-MEF2C

1,25D and its analogs upregulate the expression of ERK5, which positively regulates the early-stage monocytic differentiation of AML cells [75,87,141]. The pharmacological inhibitor of MEK5 (an upstream activator of ERK5), BIX02189 [174] and the inhibitor of ERK5 autophosphorylation, XMD8-92 [175], lead to the reduction of cell surface CD14 and an increase in CD11b expression [141]. ERK5 is a positive regulator of C/EBPβ TF, the direct activator of CD14, but negatively regulates the expression of C/EBPα [141]. MEF2C, a known downstream target of ERK5 [82,141], has recently been shown to be involved in 1,25D-induced AML differentiation and is reported to lie upstream of C/EBPβ and to control the expression of CD14, but not CD11b [176]. Importantly, the enzyme activity of Cot1, an upstream regulator of MEK5-ERK5-MEF2C, increases in AML cells during 1,25D-induced differentiation, as does phosphorylation of MEF2C, a downstream target of ERK5 [42,176] (Figure 3). It is also relevant that FLT3 kinase may activate MEK5 by its phosphorylation, which results in the activation of ERK5 of AML cells that have an internal tandem duplication in FLT3 [177]. As CD11b expression generally suggests terminal differentiation, the dissociation of CD14 and CD11b expression by the MEK5-ERK5-MEF2C signaling cascade implies that the monocytic characteristics of AML cells in the early phase of 1,25D-induced differentiation may just be an associated phenomenon, but is not a necessary component of any potential anti-cancer effect of 1,25D.

3.2. The Effect of 1,25D on the PI3 Kinase-Akt1-mTOR Pathway

Activation of the PI3K/Akt1/mTOR pathway is important for 1,25D-mediated protection against apoptosis, as well as for the induction of the differentiation of AML cells [150,178,179,180,181]. Inhibition of PI3K by LY294002 or by Wortmannin accentuates the 1,25D-induced G1 to S phase cell cycle block in HL60 cells and is associated with an increased expression of p27Kip1 protein [150]. Moreover, LY294002 inhibits nuclear translocation of VDR and prevents activation of 1,25D target genes triggering monocytic differentiation [173].

3.3. The Influence of 1,25D on AML Cells with Mutated FLT3 Kinase

Only a few reports focus on the susceptibility of AML cells to the combined effects of 1,25D-induced differentiation and FLT3 kinase activating mutations. Studies performed on blast cells isolated from the peripheral blood of patients with diagnosed FLT3 mutations revealed that those cells exhibit resistance to 1,25D and to its “semi-selective” analogs [145,182]. This notwithstanding, AML cell lines with mutated FLT3 kinase, such as MV4-11 or MOLM-13, do respond to 1,25D-induced differentiation [145,183]. Treatment of elderly relapsed AML patients with cytotoxic agents, 1,25D and the FLT3 kinase inhibitor, CEP-701, gave highly variable results [13].

3.4. Effects of 1,25D on C/EBPα

It is well documented that C/EBPα is indispensable for granulocytes to develop, while C/EBPβ regulates the differentiation of monocytic cells [115,184,185]. In HL60 cells exposed to 1,25D, C/EBPα isoforms are transiently upregulated in the early stages (up to 24 h) of the differentiation process, while C/EBPβ isoforms are upregulated in a sustained fashion and parallel to the expression of CD14 and CD11b surface markers [45]. A generally accepted scheme assumes that 1,25D-induced expression of C/EBPβ allows the cells to bypass the granulocytic differentiation block caused by dysregulation of C/EBPα and switches the cells into monocytes [45,156,186].

3.5. The Effect of 1,25D on MicroRNAs

Relatively little is known regarding the influence of 1,25D on microRNA expression in AML cells, but it is postulated that similarly to the other types of cancer, the microRNA expression profile (“signature”) may be helpful for AML diagnosis and for the selection of suitable therapy. It was shown that during 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells, microRNA-181a and microRNA-181b are downregulated [187]. MicroRNA-181a inhibition by 1,25D results in an increase of p27Kip1 mRNA and protein level, which, in turn, leads to G1/S blockade [187,188,189]. Furthermore, microRNA-302c and microRNA-520c are downregulated by 1,25D in Kasumi-1 and K562 AML cell lines, where they enhance the susceptibility of those cells to natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity [190]. Other microRNAs downregulated by 1,25D in AML cells are microRNA-17-5p/20a/106a, microRNA-125b and microRNA-155, which target AML1, VDR and C/EBPβ [191].
1,25D can upregulate microRNA-32, which targets pro-apoptotic protein Bim [192]. Decreased expression of microRNA-32 can sensitize AML cells to the cytotoxic agents, for instance arabinocytosine [192]. Another microRNA upregulated by 1,25D in AML cells is microRNA-26a [193], which targets transcriptional repressor E2F7 [194]. The repression of E2F7 by miR-26a contributes to the increased expression of p21Cip1/Waf1 observed during 1,25D-induced monocytic differentiation of AML cells. Moreover, silencing of E2F7 results in inhibition of c-Myc activity and downregulation of its transcriptional target, the oncogenic miR-17-92 cluster [194] (Figure 4).
1,25D down-regulates (⟞) the expression of microRNA-181a, which is a negative regulator of p27Kip1. This causes the block of the negative action of microRNA-181a ( Jcm 04 00504 i001) and elevated expression of p27Kip1 ( ↑ ). 1,25D also downregulates other microRNAs, such as microRNA-106a, -20a and -155, that target and inhibit the expression of VDR and C/EBPβ. 1,25D can up-regulate ( → ) microRNA-32, which targets pro-apoptotic protein Bim and inhibits its expression ( ↓ ). Furthermore, microRNA-26a is upregulated by 1,25D. MicroRNA-26a inhibits transcriptional repressor E2F7, which, in turn, no longer inhibits p21Cip1/Waf1, and its expression is elevated. Regulation of microRNA expression by 1,25D leads to the augmented differentiation, inhibition of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in the G1/S phase.
Jcm 04 00504 g004 1024
Figure 4. Regulation of microRNA expression by 1,25D in AML cells.
Figure 4. Regulation of microRNA expression by 1,25D in AML cells.
Jcm 04 00504 g004

4. Potentiators of 1,25D-Induced Differentiation of AML Cells

1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells may be augmented by several natural and chemical compounds (Table 1). One such compound is carnosic acid (CA), the plant-derived polyphenolic antioxidant. CA alone is weakly cytostatic to AML cells, but in combination with 1,25D, increases differentiation and upregulates the expression of ERK5, c-Jun and AP1 [87,166,169,195,196,197]. Moreover, CA together with a 1,25D analog, doxercalciferol, decreases the expression level of microRNA-181a [189]. Similarly to CA, other plant antioxidants, curcumin and silibinin, can inhibit AML cell growth when used alone, but show synergistic or additive effects on differentiation when combined with VDDs [195,198,199,200].
It was also shown that an inhibitor of the Akt1/mTOR pathway, RAD001 (Everolimus), potentiates 1,25D-induced growth arrest and differentiation of AML cells, due to the enhancement of 1,25D-mediated transcriptional activation of p21Cip1/Waf1 in association with increased level of the acetylated forms of histone H3 and VDR bound to the p21Cip1/Waf1 promoter [201].
A large number of compounds can potentiate 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells [198,202]. Natural compounds include plant polyphenols, carnosic acid, curcumin or silibinin [195,198,203]. Other compounds, such as iron chelators [204] or chemical inhibitors [205], are also capable of enhancing 1,25D action.
Table
Table 1. Examples of potentiators of 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells.
Table 1. Examples of potentiators of 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells.
CompoundCharacteristicMode of Action with 1,25DCitations
Nutlin 3acis-imidazoline analog, inhibits interaction between Mdm2 and p53▪ downregulation of Bcl-2, MDMX, KSR2, phospho-ERK2
▪ upregulation of PIG-6		[152]
Carnosic acidnatural benzenediol abietane diterpene from rosemary▪ upregulation of ERK5, c-Jun and AP1
▪ downregulation of microRNA-181a expression		[189,196,197]
Curcumindiarylheptanoid, natural phenol from turmeric▪ activation of caspase-3, -8 and -9[195]
Silibininflavonolignan from the milk thistle seeds ▪ upregulation of c-Jun and C/EBPβ[199,200]
Everolimus40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl) derivative of sirolimus▪ inhibition of Akt/mTOR[201]
Deferasiroxiron chelator▪ induction of VDR expression and phosphorylation[204,207]
Q-VD-OPhpan-caspase inhibitor▪ upregulation of HPK1 and c-Jun[205]
Indomethacinnon-steroid inhibitor of cyclooxygenase▪ inhibition of phospho-Raf1[206]
Other compounds that can enhance 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells are COX1 and COX2 inhibitors [206]. It was found that a combination treatment with 1,25D and non-specific COX inhibitors acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) or indomethacin can robustly potentiate the differentiation of several AML cell lines and that ASA ± 1,25D is effective in enhanced differentiation of primary AML cultures. Increased cell differentiation is paralleled by arrest of the cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and by increased phosphorylation of Raf1 and p90RSK1 proteins [206].
Iron chelating agents, such as deferasirox, also turned out to be an effective enhancer of 1,25D-induced differentiation of AML cells [204]. This compound induces expression and phosphorylation of the VDR. The combination of iron-chelating agents and 1,25D resulted in the reversal of pancytopenia and in blast differentiation, suggesting that iron availability modulates myeloid cell commitment and that targeting this cellular differentiation pathway together with the conventional differentiating agents can provide a therapeutic benefit for an AML patient [204]. This conclusion is reinforced by the subsequent retrospective study, which showed that the combination of deferasirox and vitamin D improves overall survival in elderly patients with AML after demethylating agent failure [207]. In accordance with these feasibility studies, a phase 1 and 2 clinical trial (NCT01718366) of combined deferasirox, vitamin D, and azacitidine in high risk MDS is in progress.

5. Clinical Trials with VDDs Targeting Signaling Pathways in AML

Poor responsiveness to standard chemotherapy is still a problem for a significant number of patients with neoplastic diseases. While the current focus in the field is on individualized therapy based on molecular features of the disease, the great heterogeneity of mutations in AML makes this a remote aim. Thus, the possibility that a differentiation-based approach can be used for a large subset of AML patients has been attractive. However, the attempts to utilize the differentiation properties of VDDs have had so far minimal success, possibly due, at least in part, to the variable levels of vitamin D receptors in the malignant cells [18].
A recent review by Kim et al. [15] includes a list of clinical trials mainly conducted in the early 1990s, which seem to have mostly “fizzled out”, that have not led to any major advances in the treatment of AML. Harrison and Bershadskiy [16] describe these clinical trials in depth and list two more trials in patients with MDS, often a pre-leukemic disease, but neither trial led to dramatic or promising results. More recently, several other trials of VDDs have been conducted in MDS patients; however, the results of those have not yet appeared in the literature, and the only phase 3 trial that could be found at this time (NCT00804050) has been terminated, reportedly due to “difficulties in enrollment”. Thus, there remains substantial uncertainty as to whether VDDs, with or without potentiators that were used in the majority of experiments reported to date, will have a significant therapeutic effect in AML. It would appear that at least part of the problem is that the potentiators/enhancers so far used with VDDs had no clearly defined mechanism of potentiation of their combined actions. These have included new cytotoxic agents and their combinations with cell cycle, histone deacetylase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, FLT3 kinase inhibitors and hypomethylating agents currently used as enhancers of cytotoxic therapy (Table 2). Such agents do have a clearly defined basis of action as single agents, but the rationales of the potentiation of the differentiation agents are not clear. Most relevant to this topic are phase I/II trials of MEK inhibitors AS703026 3 (pimasertib) and GSK1120212 (trametinib). These trials investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity of these compounds in AML patients with all subtypes, except FAB M3 [208,209,210]. Further problems in drawing conclusions regarding the efficacy of VDDs in AML based on the clinical trials reported to date are the great heterogeneity of the patient populations studied and the variability in the dose and schedule of the VDDs used to date.
It is proposed that a better understanding of the signaling pathways underlying VDD actions may stimulate the generation of new concepts for clinical trials of VDDs with potentiators. Perhaps a simultaneous, or sequential, targeting of pathways described here by VDDs and enhancers or inhibitors of these pathways will provide conceptually new regimens for clinical trials of VDDs. The importance of optimal sequencing in differentiation therapy is suggested by a recent report that survival of patients with AML/MDS was improved by agents, which included VDDs, administered during the maintenance of remission induced by chemotherapy [211]. Furthermore, in addition to pathway inhibitors, pathway activators should also be considered for the enhancement of VDD therapeutic activity.
Table
Table 2. New agents in AML clinical trials. The recent clinical trials of AML have focused on new cytotoxic drugs, cell cycle and histone deacetylase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, FLT3 and MEK kinase inhibitors or hypomethylating agents. These were conducted without VDDs.
Table 2. New agents in AML clinical trials. The recent clinical trials of AML have focused on new cytotoxic drugs, cell cycle and histone deacetylase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, FLT3 and MEK kinase inhibitors or hypomethylating agents. These were conducted without VDDs.
TargetCompoundsPhaseStatus of the studyExamples of studies
Cell cycle inhibitionrigosertibI/IIongoing, recruitment closedNCT01167166
volasertibIongoing, recruitment openedNCT02003573
CytotoxictyclofarabineIongoing, recruitment openedNCT01289457
sapacitabineIIIongoing, recruitment openedNCT01303796
vosaroxinI/IIongoing, recruitment openedNCT01893320
DNA hypomethylationazacitidineIIongoing, no recruitmentNCT01358734
decitabineIIongoing, recruitment openedNCT02188706
SGI-110IIongoing, recruitment openedNCT02096055
FLT3 small-molecule inhibitorscrenolanibIIongoing, recurNCT01657682
midostaurinI/IIitment openedNCT01093573
sorafenibIIongoing, recruitment openedNCT02196857
not yet open for recruitment
Histone deacetylase inhibitorspanobinostatI/IIongoing, recruitment openedNCT01451268
pracinostatIIongoing, recruitment openedNCT01912274
vorinostatIongoing, no recruimentNCT00875745
Monoclonal antibodiesgemtuzumab ozogamicinIIIongoing, recruitment openedNCT00893399
SGN33a Iongoing, recruitment openedNCT01902329
MEK inhibitorsMEK162I/IIongoing, recruitment openedNCT02089230
trametinib (GSK1120212)IIongoing, recruitment openedNCT01907815

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

It is clear that despite the strong epidemiological evidence that optimal levels of vitamin D reduce overall mortality by at least 7% [212,213], while low vitamin D levels are associated with adverse outcomes in AML [214], translation of this knowledge to cancer prevention or treatment has been disappointingly slow. The early focus on the generation and testing of countless vitamin D analogs for cancer treatment has not led to encouraging results, and combinations of 1,25D or analogs with cytotoxic agents have not led to conclusive results in neoplastic diseases, including AML [215,216,217]. It appears more likely that the therapeutic regimens for AML will require the addition of small molecule inhibitors, or enhancers of signaling pathways, or entirely new strategies. The latter can capitalize on the known changes in gene expression elicited by 1,25D, summarized here. Although current excitement in the field of cancer therapy is largely directed to targeting specific mutations, found successful for CML and APL, the vast majority of leukemia cases have a highly heterogeneous set of mutations, making targeting not likely in the foreseeable future. Thus, randomized trials with patients with AML other than APL need to be organized, with time to relapse as the main end point, for confirming the findings that MAPKs, and other signaling cascades, present important auxiliary targets that can enhance the effectiveness of the cytotoxic therapy or immunotherapy of cancer.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jonathan Harrison and Ruifang Zheng for valuable comments on the manuscript. The experimental work of the authors was supported by NIH Grant No. R0-1 CA 22744-24 to George P. Studzinski and by the Polish National Science Centre (Grant No. 0351/B/P01/2011/40), as well as the University of Wroclaw Scholarship (Human Capital Program, No. BPZ.506.50.2012.MS) to Elzbieta Gocek.

Author Contributions

The authors equally contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.

Abbreviations

1,25D
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
Akt1
protein kinase B
ALL
acute lymphoblastic leukemia
AML
acute myeloid leukemia
AP1
activator protein 1
APL
acute promyelocytic leukemia
ATF2
activating transcription factor 2
ATRA
all-trans retinoic acid
CA
carnosic acid
C/EBPs
CCAAT enhancer binding proteins
CML
chronic myelogenous leukemia
Cot1
cancer Osaka thyroid 1
COX
cyclooxygenase
ERK
extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase
FLT3
FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3
GPCRs
G-protein-coupled receptors
GWA
genome-wide association
JNKs
c-Jun N-terminal kinases
KSR
kinase suppressor of Ras
MAPK
mitogen-activated kinase
MAP2K
mitogen-activated kinase kinase
MAP3K
mitogen-activated kinase kinase kinase
MDS
myelodysplastic syndrome
MEF2
myogenic enhancer factor 2
mTOR
mammalian target of rapamycin
non-RTKs
non-receptor tyrosine kinases
PDK1
3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1
PI3K
phosphatidylinositol 3-linase
PIP2
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate
PIP3
phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate
RTKs
receptor tyrosine kinases
TF
transcription factor
TKD
Tyrosine Kinase Domain
VDDs
vitamin D compounds/derivatives
VDR
vitamin D receptor

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nowell, P.C. Differentiation of human leukemic leukocytes in tissue culture. Exp. Cell Res. 1960, 19, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lugo, T.G.; Pendergast, A.M.; Muller, A.J.; Witte, O.N. Tyrosine kinase activity and transformation potency of Bcr-Abl oncogene products. Science 1990, 247, 1079–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Druker, B.J.; Tamura, S.; Buchdunger, E.; Ohno, S.; Segal, G.M.; Fanning, S.; Zimmermann, J.; Lydon, N.B. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Druker, B.J.; Sawyers, C.L.; Kantarjian, H.; Resta, D.J.; Reese, S.F.; Ford, J.M.; Capdeville, R.; Talpaz, M. Activity of a specific inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1038–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rowley, J.D.; Golomb, H.M.; Dougherty, C. 15/17 translocation, a consistent chromosomal change in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Lancet 1977, 1, 549–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Borrow, J.; Goddard, A.D.; Sheer, D.; Solomon, E. Molecular analysis of acute promyelocytic leukemia breakpoint cluster region on chromosome 17. Science 1990, 249, 1577–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Longo, L.; Pandolfi, P.P.; Biondi, A.; Rambaldi, A.; Mencarelli, A.; Lo Coco, F.; Diverio, D.; Pegoraro, L.; Avanzi, G.; Tabilio, A.; et al. Rearrangements and aberrant expression of the retinoic acid receptor alpha gene in acute promyelocytic leukemias. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 172, 1571–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Grignani, F.; De Matteis, S.; Nervi, C.; Tomassoni, L.; Gelmetti, V.; Cioce, M.; Fanelli, M.; Ruthardt, M.; Ferrara, F.F.; Zamir, I.; et al. Fusion proteins of the retinoic acid receptor-alpha recruit histone deacetylase in promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature 1998, 391, 815–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Guidez, F.; Ivins, S.; Zhu, J.; Soderstrom, M.; Waxman, S.; Zelent, A. Reduced retinoic acid-sensitivities of nuclear receptor corepressor binding to PML- and PLZF-RARalpha underlie molecular pathogenesis and treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 1998, 91, 2634–2642. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Petrie, K.; Zelent, A.; Waxman, S. Differentiation therapy of acute myeloid leukemia: Past, present and future. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2009, 16, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Luong, Q.T.; Koeffler, H.P. Vitamin D compounds in leukemia. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 97, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yamada, K.; Mizusawa, M.; Harima, A.; Kajiwara, K.; Hamaki, T.; Hoshi, K.; Kozai, Y.; Kodo, H. Induction of remission of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after unrelated donor cord blood transplantation by concomitant low-dose cytarabine and calcitriol in adults. Eur. J. Haematol. 2006, 77, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ferrara, F.; Fazi, P.; Venditti, A.; Pagano, L.; Amadori, S.; Mandelli, F. Heterogeneity in the therapeutic approach to relapsed elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: A survey from the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’ Adulto (GIMEMA) Acute Leukaemia Working Party. Hematol. Oncol. 2008, 26, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bendik, I.; Friedel, A.; Roos, F.F.; Weber, P.; Eggersdorfer, M. Vitamin D: A critical and essential micronutrient for human health. Front Physiol 2014, 5, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, M.; Mirandola, L.; Pandey, A.; Nguyen, D.D.; Jenkins, M.R.; Turcel, M.; Cobos, E.; Chiriva-Internati, M. Application of vitamin D and derivatives in hematological malignancies. Cancer Lett. 2012, 319, 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Harrison, J.S.; Bershadskiy, A. Clinical experience using vitamin D analogs in the treatment of myelodysplasia and acute myleoid leukemia: A review of the literature. Leuk. Res. Treat. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hall, A.C.; Juckett, M.B. The role of vitamin D in hematologic disease and stem cell transplantation. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2206–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Marchwicka, A.; Cebrat, M.; Sampath, P.; Sniezewski, L.; Marcinkowska, E. Perspectives of differentiation therapies of acute myeloid leukemia: The search for the molecular basis of patients’ variable responses to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D analogs. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lowenberg, B. Acute myeloid leukemia: The challenge of capturing disease variety. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Progr. 2008, 2008, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vardiman, J.W. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: An overview with emphasis on the myeloid neoplasms. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2010, 184, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hasserjian, R.P. Acute myeloid leukemia: Advances in diagnosis and classification. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2013, 35, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bennett, J.M.; Catovsky, D.; Daniel, M.T.; Flandrin, G.; Galton, D.A.; Gralnick, H.R.; Sultan, C. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group. Br. J. Haematol. 1976, 33, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vardiman, J.W.; Harris, N.L.; Brunning, R.D. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood 2002, 100, 2292–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bories, P.; Bertoli, S.; Berard, E.; Laurent, J.; Duchayne, E.; Sarry, A.; Delabesse, E.; Beyne-Rauzy, O.; Huguet, F.; Recher, C. Intensive chemotherapy, azacitidine or supportive care in older acute myeloid leukemia patients: An analysis from a regional healthcare network. Am. J. Hematol. 2014, 89, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sanders, M.A.; Valk, P.J. The evolving molecular genetic landscape in acute myeloid leukaemia. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2013, 20, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abdel-Wahab, O.; Levine, R.L. Mutations in epigenetic modifiers in the pathogenesis and therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2013, 121, 3563–3572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Estey, E.H. Acute myeloid leukemia: 2013 update on risk-stratification and management. Am. J. Hematol. 2013, 88, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Meyer, S.C.; Levine, R.L. Translational implications of somatic genomics in acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, e382–e394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Huang, M.E.; Ye, Y.C.; Chen, S.R.; Chai, J.R.; Lu, J.X.; Zhoa, L.; Gu, L.J.; Wang, Z.Y. Use of all-trans retinoic acid in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 1988, 72, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Ades, L.; Chevret, S.; Raffoux, E.; Guerci-Bresler, A.; Pigneux, A.; Vey, N.; Lamy, T.; Huguet, F.; Vekhoff, A.; Lambert, J.F.; et al. Long-term follow-up of European APL 2000 trial, evaluating the role of cytarabine combined with ATRA and Daunorubicin in the treatment of nonelderly APL patients. Am. J. Hematol. 2013, 88, 556–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cull, E.H.; Altman, J.K. Contemporary treatment of APL. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2014, 9, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Honma, Y.; Hozumi, M.; Abe, E.; Konno, K.; Fukushima, M.; Hata, S.; Nishii, Y.; DeLuca, H.F.; Suda, T. 1 alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 1 alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 prolong survival time of mice inoculated with myeloid leukemia cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. McCarthy, D.M.; San Miguel, J.F.; Freake, H.C.; Green, P.M.; Zola, H.; Catovsky, D.; Goldman, J.M. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits proliferation of human promyelocytic leukaemia (HL60) cells and induces monocyte-macrophage differentiation in HL60 and normal human bone marrow cells. Leuk. Res. 1983, 7, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Studzinski, G.P.; Bhandal, A.K.; Brelvi, Z.S. A system for monocytic differentiation of leukemic cells HL 60 by a short exposure to 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1985, 179, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Studzinski, G.P.; Bhandal, A.K.; Brelvi, Z.S. Cell cycle sensitivity of HL-60 cells to the differentiation-inducing effects of 1-alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Cancer Res. 1985, 45, 3898–3905. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Brelvi, Z.S.; Studzinski, G.P. Changes in the expression of oncogenes encoding nuclear phosphoproteins but not c-Ha-ras have a relationship to monocytic differentiation of HL 60 cells. J. Cell Biol. 1986, 102, 2234–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Raman, M.; Chen, W.; Cobb, M.H. Differential regulation and properties of MAPKs. Oncogene 2007, 26, 3100–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Geest, C.R.; Coffer, P.J. MAPK signaling pathways in the regulation of hematopoiesis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2009, 86, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhou, G.; Bao, Z.Q.; Dixon, J.E. Components of a new human protein kinase signal transduction pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 12665–12669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, X.; Rao, J.; Studzinski, G.P. Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase activity up-regulates multiple MAP kinase pathways and potentiates 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced differentiation of human leukemia HL60 cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2000, 258, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. Inhibition of p38MAP kinase potentiates the JNK/SAPK pathway and AP-1 activity in monocytic but not in macrophage or granulocytic differentiation of HL60 cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2001, 82, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. Oncoprotein Cot1 represses kinase suppressors of Ras1/2 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced differentiation of human acute myeloid leukemia cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 226, 1232–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jin, W.; Lu, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Chang, G.; Lin, Y.; Pang, T. Down-regulation of the P-glycoprotein relevant for multidrug resistance by intracellular acidification through the crosstalk of MAPK signaling pathways. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 54, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chang, F.; Steelman, L.S.; Lee, J.T.; Shelton, J.G.; Navolanic, P.M.; Blalock, W.L.; Franklin, R.A.; McCubrey, J.A. Signal transduction mediated by the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway from cytokine receptors to transcription factors: Potential targeting for therapeutic intervention. Leukemia 2003, 17, 1263–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Marcinkowska, E.; Garay, E.; Gocek, E.; Chrobak, A.; Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. Regulation of C/EBPbeta isoforms by MAPK pathways in HL60 cells induced to differentiate by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312, 2054–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Miranda, M.B.; Xu, H.; Torchia, J.A.; Johnson, D.E. Cytokine-induced myeloid differentiation is dependent on activation of the MEK/ERK pathway. Leuk. Res. 2005, 29, 1293–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ross, S.E.; Radomska, H.S.; Wu, B.; Zhang, P.; Winnay, J.N.; Bajnok, L.; Wright, W.S.; Schaufele, F.; Tenen, D.G.; MacDougald, O.A. Phosphorylation of C/EBPalpha inhibits granulopoiesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Morrison, D.K. KSR: A MAPK scaffold of the Ras pathway? J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114, 1609–1612. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. Kinase suppressor of RAS (KSR) amplifies the differentiation signal provided by low concentrations 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J. Cell. Physiol. 2004, 198, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. McKay, M.M.; Ritt, D.A.; Morrison, D.K. Signaling dynamics of the KSR1 scaffold complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 11022–11027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhang, H.; Koo, C.Y.; Stebbing, J.; Giamas, G. The dual function of KSR1: A pseudokinase and beyond. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2013, 41, 1078–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhao, Y.; Bjorbaek, C.; Moller, D.E. Regulation and interaction of p90 (Rsk) isoforms with mitogen-activated protein kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 29773–29779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) defines the first phase of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced differentiation of HL60 cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2001, 80, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. Raf-1 signaling is required for the later stages of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced differentiation of HL60 cells but is not mediated by the MEK/ERK module. J. Cell. Physiol. 2006, 209, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hibi, M.; Lin, A.; Smeal, T.; Minden, A.; Karin, M. Identification of an oncoprotein- and UV-responsive protein kinase that binds and potentiates the c-Jun activation domain. Genes Dev. 1993, 7, 2135–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sluss, H.K.; Barrett, T.; Derijard, B.; Davis, R.J. Signal transduction by tumor necrosis factor mediated by JNK protein kinases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 8376–8384. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Karin, M.; Gallagher, E. From JNK to pay dirt: Jun kinases, their biochemistry, physiology and clinical importance. IUBMB Life 2005, 57, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tournier, C.; Whitmarsh, A.J.; Cavanagh, J.; Barrett, T.; Davis, R.J. The MKK7 gene encodes a group of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase kinases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 1569–1581. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Kyriakis, J.M.; Banerjee, P.; Nikolakaki, E.; Dai, T.; Rubie, E.A.; Ahmad, M.F.; Avruch, J.; Woodgett, J.R. The stress-activated protein kinase subfamily of c-Jun kinases. Nature 1994, 369, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lee, Y.H.; Giraud, J.; Davis, R.J.; White, M.F. c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) mediates feedback inhibition of the insulin signaling cascade. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 2896–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. The requirement for and changing composition of the activating protein-1 transcription factor during differentiation of human leukemia HL60 cells induced by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 4402–4409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Krishna, M.; Narang, H. The complexity of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) made simple. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 3525–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hale, K.K.; Trollinger, D.; Rihanek, M.; Manthey, C.L. Differential expression and activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase alpha, beta, gamma, and delta in inflammatory cell lineages. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 4246–4252. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Uddin, S.; Ah-Kang, J.; Ulaszek, J.; Mahmud, D.; Wickrema, A. Differentiation stage-specific activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase isoforms in primary human erythroid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, J.; Posner, G.H.; Danilenko, M.; Studzinski, G.P. Differentiation-inducing potency of the seco-steroid JK-1624F2–2 can be increased by combination with an antioxidant and a p38MAPK inhibitor which upregulates the JNK pathway. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 105, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, J.; Harrison, J.S.; Studzinski, G.P. Isoforms of p38MAPK gamma and delta contribute to differentiation of human AML cells induced by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Exp. Cell Res. 2011, 317, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Jiang, Y.; Gram, H.; Zhao, M.; New, L.; Gu, J.; Feng, L.; Di Padova, F.; Ulevitch, R.J.; Han, J. Characterization of the structure and function of the fourth member of p38 group mitogen-activated protein kinases, p38delta. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 30122–30128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Han, S.J.; Choi, K.Y.; Brey, P.T.; Lee, W.J. Molecular cloning and characterization of a Drosophila p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zarubin, T.; Han, J. Activation and signaling of the p38 MAP kinase pathway. Cell Res. 2005, 15, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Brancho, D.; Tanaka, N.; Jaeschke, A.; Ventura, J.J.; Kelkar, N.; Tanaka, Y.; Kyuuma, M.; Takeshita, T.; Flavell, R.A.; Davis, R.J. Mechanism of p38 MAP kinase activation in vivo. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1969–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Deacon, K.; Mistry, P.; Chernoff, J.; Blank, J.L.; Patel, R. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase mediates cell death and p21-activated kinase mediates cell survival during chemotherapeutic drug-induced mitotic arrest. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14, 2071–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Cuadrado, A.; Nebreda, A.R. Mechanisms and functions of p38 MAPK signalling. Biochem. J. 2010, 429, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Pritchard, A.L.; Hayward, N.K. Molecular pathways: Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway mutations and drug resistance. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 2301–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, X.; Tournier, C. Regulation of cellular functions by the ERK5 signalling pathway. Cell Signal. 2006, 18, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, X.; Pesakhov, S.; Harrison, J.S.; Kafka, M.; Danilenko, M.; Studzinski, G.P. The MAPK ERK5, but not ERK1/2, inhibits the progression of monocytic phenotype to the functioning macrophage. Exp. Cell Res. 2015, 330, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Nakamura, K.; Johnson, G.L. PB1 domains of MEKK2 and MEKK3 interact with the MEK5 PB1 domain for activation of the ERK5 pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 36989–36992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Seyfried, J.; Wang, X.; Kharebava, G.; Tournier, C. A novel mitogen-activated protein kinase docking site in the N terminus of MEK5alpha organizes the components of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 9820–9828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lopez-Royuela, N.; Rathore, M.G.; Allende-Vega, N.; Annicotte, J.S.; Fajas, L.; Ramachandran, B.; Gulick, T.; Villalba, M. Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 5 modulates the antioxidant response by transcriptionally controlling Sirtuin 1 expression in leukemic cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 53, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kondoh, K.; Terasawa, K.; Morimoto, H.; Nishida, E. Regulation of nuclear translocation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 by active nuclear import and export mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 1679–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Mody, N.; Campbell, D.G.; Morrice, N.; Peggie, M.; Cohen, P. An analysis of the phosphorylation and activation of extracellular-signal-regulated protein kinase 5 (ERK5) by mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 5 (MKK5) in vitro. Biochem. J. 2003, 372, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Morimoto, H.; Kondoh, K.; Nishimoto, S.; Terasawa, K.; Nishida, E. Activation of a C-terminal transcriptional activation domain of ERK5 by autophosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 35449–35456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kato, Y.; Kravchenko, V.V.; Tapping, R.I.; Han, J.; Ulevitch, R.J.; Lee, J.D. BMK1/ERK5 regulates serum-induced early gene expression through transcription factor MEF2C. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 7054–7066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kamakura, S.; Moriguchi, T.; Nishida, E. Activation of the protein kinase ERK5/BMK1 by receptor tyrosine kinases. Identification and characterization of a signaling pathway to the nucleus. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 26563–26571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Terasawa, K.; Okazaki, K.; Nishida, E. Regulation of c-Fos and Fra-1 by the MEK5-ERK5 pathway. Genes Cells 2003, 8, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Buschbeck, M.; Ullrich, A. The unique C-terminal tail of the mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK5 regulates its activation and nuclear shuttling. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 2659–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chiariello, M.; Marinissen, M.J.; Gutkind, J.S. Multiple mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways connect the Cot oncoprotein to the c-Jun promoter and to cellular transformation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 1747–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wang, X.; Gocek, E.; Novik, V.; Harrison, J.S.; Danilenko, M.; Studzinski, G.P. Inhibition of Cot1/Tlp2 oncogene in AML cells reduces ERK5 activation and up-regulates p27Kip1 concomitant with enhancement of differentiation and cell cycle arrest induced by silibinin and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 4542–4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Katso, R.; Okkenhaug, K.; Ahmadi, K.; White, S.; Timms, J.; Waterfield, M.D. Cellular function of phosphoinositide 3-kinases: Implications for development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 17, 615–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ciruelos Gil, E.M. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2013, 40, 862–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jabbour, E.; Ottmann, O.G.; Deininger, M.; Hochhaus, A. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in hematologic malignancies. Haematologica 2014, 99, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; McIlroy, J.; Rordorf-Nikolic, T.; Orr, G.A.; Backer, J.M. Regulation of the p85/p110 phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase: Stabilization and inhibition of the p110alpha catalytic subunit by the p85 regulatory subunit. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 1379–1387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Hawkins, P.T.; Anderson, K.E.; Davidson, K.; Stephens, L.R. Signalling through Class I PI3Ks in mammalian cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34, 647–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Krugmann, S.; Hawkins, P.T.; Pryer, N.; Braselmann, S. Characterizing the interactions between the two subunits of the p101/p110gamma phosphoinositide 3-kinase and their role in the activation of this enzyme by G beta gamma subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 17152–17158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Jia, S.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Liu, P.; Zhang, L.; Lee, S.H.; Zhang, J.; Signoretti, S.; Loda, M.; Roberts, T.M.; et al. Essential roles of PI(3)K-p110beta in cell growth, metabolism and tumorigenesis. Nature 2008, 454, 776–779. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Saudemont, A.; Garcon, F.; Yadi, H.; Roche-Molina, M.; Kim, N.; Segonds-Pichon, A.; Martin-Fontecha, A.; Okkenhaug, K.; Colucci, F. p110gamma and p110delta isoforms of phosphoinositide 3-kinase differentially regulate natural killer cell migration in health and disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5795–5800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Murga, C.; Laguinge, L.; Wetzker, R.; Cuadrado, A.; Gutkind, J.S. Activation of Akt/protein kinase B by G protein-coupled receptors. A role for alpha and beta gamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins acting through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinasegamma. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 19080–19085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kurig, B.; Shymanets, A.; Bohnacker, T.; Prajwal; Brock, C.; Ahmadian, M.R.; Schaefer, M.; Gohla, A.; Harteneck, C.; Wymann, M.P.; et al. Ras is an indispensable coregulator of the class IB phosphoinositide 3-kinase p87/p110gamma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 20312–20317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sarbassov, D.D.; Ali, S.M.; Sengupta, S.; Sheen, J.H.; Hsu, P.P.; Bagley, A.F.; Markhard, A.L.; Sabatini, D.M. Prolonged rapamycin treatment inhibits mTORC2 assembly and Akt/PKB. Mol. Cell 2006, 22, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bayascas, J.R. Dissecting the role of the 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) signalling pathways. Cell Cycle 2008, 7, 2978–2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Gutierrez, A.; Sanda, T.; Grebliunaite, R.; Carracedo, A.; Salmena, L.; Ahn, Y.; Dahlberg, S.; Neuberg, D.; Moreau, L.A.; Winter, S.S.; et al. High frequency of PTEN, PI3K, and AKT abnormalities in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2009, 114, 647–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Sykes, S.M.; Lane, S.W.; Bullinger, L.; Kalaitzidis, D.; Yusuf, R.; Saez, B.; Ferraro, F.; Mercier, F.; Singh, H.; Brumme, K.M.; et al. AKT/FOXO signaling enforces reversible differentiation blockade in myeloid leukemias. Cell 2011, 146, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Tamburini, J.; Chapuis, N.; Bardet, V.; Park, S.; Sujobert, P.; Willems, L.; Ifrah, N.; Dreyfus, F.; Mayeux, P.; Lacombe, C.; et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt by up-regulating insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor signaling in acute myeloid leukemia: Rationale for therapeutic inhibition of both pathways. Blood 2008, 111, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Vu, C.; Fruman, D.A. Target of rapamycin signaling in leukemia and lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 5374–5380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Altman, J.K.; Sassano, A.; Platanias, L.C. Targeting mTOR for the treatment of AML. New agents and new directions. Oncotarget 2011, 2, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Rosnet, O.; Birnbaum, D. Hematopoietic receptors of class III receptor-type tyrosine kinases. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 1993, 4, 595–613. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  106. Lyman, S.D. Biology of flt3 ligand and receptor. Int. J. Hematol. 1995, 62, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Schnittger, S.; Schoch, C.; Dugas, M.; Kern, W.; Staib, P.; Wuchter, C.; Loffler, H.; Sauerland, C.M.; Serve, H.; Buchner, T.; et al. Analysis of FLT3 length mutations in 1003 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Correlation to cytogenetics, FAB subtype, and prognosis in the AMLCG study and usefulness as a marker for the detection of minimal residual disease. Blood 2002, 100, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Thiede, C.; Steudel, C.; Mohr, B.; Schaich, M.; Schakel, U.; Platzbecker, U.; Wermke, M.; Bornhauser, M.; Ritter, M.; Neubauer, A.; et al. Analysis of FLT3-activating mutations in 979 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: Association with FAB subtypes and identification of subgroups with poor prognosis. Blood 2002, 99, 4326–4335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Janke, H.; Pastore, F.; Schumacher, D.; Herold, T.; Hopfner, K.P.; Schneider, S.; Berdel, W.E.; Buchner, T.; Woermann, B.J.; Subklewe, M.; et al. Activating FLT3 mutants show distinct gain-of-function phenotypes in vitro and a characteristic signaling pathway profile associated with prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS One 2014, 9, e89560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Yokota, S.; Kiyoi, H.; Nakao, M.; Iwai, T.; Misawa, S.; Okuda, T.; Sonoda, Y.; Abe, T.; Kahsima, K.; Matsuo, Y.; et al. Internal tandem duplication of the FLT3 gene is preferentially seen in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome among various hematological malignancies. A study on a large series of patients and cell lines. Leukemia 1997, 11, 1605–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Choudhary, C.; Muller-Tidow, C.; Berdel, W.E.; Serve, H. Signal transduction of oncogenic Flt3. Int. J. Hematol. 2005, 82, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Takahashi, S. Downstream molecular pathways of FLT3 in the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia: Biology and therapeutic implications. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2011, 4, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Tenen, D.G.; Hromas, R.; Licht, J.D.; Zhang, D.E. Transcription factors, normal myeloid development, and leukemia. Blood 1997, 90, 489–519. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  114. Pabst, T.; Mueller, B.U.; Zhang, P.; Radomska, H.S.; Narravula, S.; Schnittger, S.; Behre, G.; Hiddemann, W.; Tenen, D.G. Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Porse, B.T.; Bryder, D.; Theilgaard-Monch, K.; Hasemann, M.S.; Anderson, K.; Damgaard, I.; Jacobsen, S.E.; Nerlov, C. Loss of C/EBP alpha cell cycle control increases myeloid progenitor proliferation and transforms the neutrophil granulocyte lineage. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Lin, F.T.; MacDougald, O.A.; Diehl, A.M.; Lane, M.D. A 30-kDa alternative translation product of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha message: Transcriptional activator lacking antimitotic activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 9606–9610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Kirstetter, P.; Schuster, M.B.; Bereshchenko, O.; Moore, S.; Dvinge, H.; Kurz, E.; Theilgaard-Monch, K.; Mansson, R.; Pedersen, T.A.; Pabst, T.; et al. Modeling of C/EBPalpha mutant acute myeloid leukemia reveals a common expression signature of committed myeloid leukemia-initiating cells. Cancer Cell 2008, 13, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Calkhoven, C.F.; Muller, C.; Leutz, A. Translational control of C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta isoform expression. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 1920–1932. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  119. Zhang, P.; Iwasaki-Arai, J.; Iwasaki, H.; Fenyus, M.L.; Dayaram, T.; Owens, B.M.; Shigematsu, H.; Levantini, E.; Huettner, C.S.; Lekstrom-Himes, J.A.; et al. Enhancement of hematopoietic stem cell repopulating capacity and self-renewal in the absence of the transcription factor C/EBP alpha. Immunity 2004, 21, 853–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Schlenk, R.F.; Dohner, K.; Krauter, J.; Frohling, S.; Corbacioglu, A.; Bullinger, L.; Habdank, M.; Spath, D.; Morgan, M.; Benner, A.; et al. Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 1909–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Lee, R.C.; Feinbaum, R.L.; Ambros, V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 1993, 75, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Lagos-Quintana, M.; Rauhut, R.; Lendeckel, W.; Tuschl, T. Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science 2001, 294, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004, 116, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Fabbri, M.; Garzon, R.; Andreeff, M.; Kantarjian, H.M.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Calin, G.A. MicroRNAs and noncoding RNAs in hematological malignancies: Molecular, clinical and therapeutic implications. Leukemia 2008, 22, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Marcucci, G.; Radmacher, M.D.; Maharry, K.; Mrozek, K.; Ruppert, A.S.; Paschka, P.; Vukosavljevic, T.; Whitman, S.P.; Baldus, C.D.; Langer, C.; et al. MicroRNA expression in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 1919–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Metzeler, K.H.; Maharry, K.; Kohlschmidt, J.; Volinia, S.; Mrozek, K.; Becker, H.; Nicolet, D.; Whitman, S.P.; Mendler, J.H.; Schwind, S.; et al. A stem cell-like gene expression signature associates with inferior outcomes and a distinct microRNA expression profile in adults with primary cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2013, 27, 2023–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Marcucci, G.; Maharry, K.S.; Metzeler, K.H.; Volinia, S.; Wu, Y.Z.; Mrozek, K.; Nicolet, D.; Kohlschmidt, J.; Whitman, S.P.; Mendler, J.H.; et al. Clinical role of microRNAs in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: MiR-155 upregulation independently identifies high-risk patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2086–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Gimenes-Teixeira, H.L.; Lucena-Araujo, A.R.; Dos Santos, G.A.; Zanette, D.L.; Scheucher, P.S.; Oliveira, L.C.; Dalmazzo, L.F.; Silva-Junior, W.A.; Falcao, R.P.; Rego, E.M. Increased expression of miR-221 is associated with shorter overall survival in T-cell acute lymphoid leukemia. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2013, 2, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Long, M.D.; Sucheston-Campbell, L.E.; Campbell, M.J. Vitamin D Receptor and RXR in the Post-Genomic Era. J. Cell. Physiol. 2014, 230, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Campbell, M.J. Vitamin D and the RNA transcriptome: More than mRNA regulation. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Heikkinen, S.; Vaisanen, S.; Pehkonen, P.; Seuter, S.; Benes, V.; Carlberg, C. Nuclear hormone 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 elicits a genome-wide shift in the locations of VDR chromatin occupancy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 9181–9193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ryynanen, J.; Seuter, S.; Campbell, M.J.; Carlberg, C. Gene regulatory scenarios of primary 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 target genes in a human myeloid leukemia cell line. Cancers (Basel) 2013, 5, 1221–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ramagopalan, S.V.; Heger, A.; Berlanga, A.J.; Maugeri, N.J.; Lincoln, M.R.; Burrell, A.; Handunnetthi, L.; Handel, A.E.; Disanto, G.; Orton, S.M.; et al. A ChIP-seq defined genome-wide map of vitamin D receptor binding: Associations with disease and evolution. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Moss, G.P. IUPAC-IUB Nomenclature of steroids. Recommendations 1989. Pure Appl. Chem. 1989, 61, 1783–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kim, T.K.; Wang, J.; Janjetovic, Z.; Chen, J.; Tuckey, R.C.; Nguyen, M.N.; Tang, E.K.; Miller, D.; Li, W.; Slominski, A.T. Correlation between secosteroid-induced vitamin D receptor activity in melanoma cells and computer-modeled receptor binding strength. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012, 361, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Morris, H.A. Vitamin D activities for health outcomes. Ann. Lab. Med. 2014, 34, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Gocek, E.; Studzinski, G.P. Vitamin D and differentiation in cancer. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2009, 46, 190–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Grober, U.; Spitz, J.; Reichrath, J.; Kisters, K.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D: Update 2013: From rickets prophylaxis to general preventive healthcare. Dermatoendocrinology 2013, 5, 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Feldman, D.; Krishnan, A.V.; Swami, S.; Giovannucci, E.; Feldman, B.J. The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014, 14, 342–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Gutsch, R.; Kandemir, J.D.; Pietsch, D.; Cappello, C.; Meyer, J.; Simanowski, K.; Huber, R.; Brand, K. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta inhibits proliferation in monocytic cells by affecting the retinoblastoma protein/E2F/cyclin E pathway but is not directly required for macrophage morphology. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 22716–22729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Wang, X.; Pesakhov, S.; Harrison, J.S.; Danilenko, M.; Studzinski, G.P. ERK5 pathway regulates transcription factors important for monocytic differentiation of human myeloid leukemia cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2014, 229, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Hickstein, D.D.; Ozols, J.; Williams, S.A.; Baenziger, J.U.; Locksley, R.M.; Roth, G.J. Isolation and characterization of the receptor on human neutrophils that mediates cellular adherence. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 5576–5580. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  143. Wright, S.D.; Ramos, R.A.; Tobias, P.S.; Ulevitch, R.J.; Mathison, J.C. CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein. Science 1990, 249, 1431–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Studzinski, G.P.; Rathod, B.; Wang, Q.M.; Rao, J.; Zhang, F. Uncoupling of cell cycle arrest from the expression of monocytic differentiation markers in HL60 cell variants. Exp. Cell Res. 1997, 232, 376–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Gocek, E.; Kielbinski, M.; Baurska, H.; Haus, O.; Kutner, A.; Marcinkowska, E. Different susceptibilities to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced differentiation of AML cells carrying various mutations. Leuk. Res. 2010, 34, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Marcinkowska, E. Evidence that activation of MEK1,2/Erk1,2 signal transduction pathway is necessary for calcitriol-induced differentiation of HL60 cells. Anticancer Res. 2001, 21, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  147. Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. Jun N-terminal kinase pathway enhances signaling of monocytic differentiation of human leukemia cells induced by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J. Cell. Biochem. 2003, 89, 1087–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Wang, Q.M.; Jones, J.B.; Studzinski, G.P. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 as a mediator of the G1/S phase block induced by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in HL60 cells. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  149. Wang, Q.M.; Studzinski, G.P.; Chen, F.; Coffman, F.D.; Harrison, L.E. p53/56(lyn) antisense shifts the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced G1/S block in HL60 cells to S phase. J. Cell. Physiol. 2000, 183, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Studzinski, G.P. AKT pathway is activated by 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and participates in its anti-apoptotic effect and cell cycle control in differentiating HL60 cells. Cell Cycle 2006, 5, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Xu, H.M.; Tepper, C.G.; Jones, J.B.; Fernandez, C.E.; Studzinski, G.P. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 protects HL60 cells against apoptosis but down-regulates the expression of the Bcl-2 gene. Exp. Cell Res. 1993, 209, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Thompson, T.; Andreeff, M.; Studzinski, G.P.; Vassilev, L.T. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 enhances the apoptotic activity of MDM2 antagonist nutlin-3a in acute myeloid leukemia cells expressing wild-type p53. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 1158–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Dudley, D.T.; Pang, L.; Decker, S.J.; Bridges, A.J.; Saltiel, A.R. A synthetic inhibitor of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 7686–7689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Ramji, D.P.; Foka, P. CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins: Structure, function and regulation. Biochem. J. 2002, 365, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  155. Huber, R.; Pietsch, D.; Panterodt, T.; Brand, K. Regulation of C/EBPbeta and resulting functions in cells of the monocytic lineage. Cell Signal. 2012, 24, 1287–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Studzinski, G.P.; Wang, X.; Ji, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Kutner, A.; Harrison, J.S. The rationale for deltanoids in therapy for myeloid leukemia: Role of KSR-MAPK-C/EBP pathway. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 97, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Buck, M.; Poli, V.; Hunter, T.; Chojkier, M. C/EBPbeta phosphorylation by RSK creates a functional XEXD caspase inhibitory box critical for cell survival. Mol. Cell 2001, 8, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Pan, Z.; Hetherington, C.J.; Zhang, D.E. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein activates the CD14 promoter and mediates transforming growth factor beta signaling in monocyte development. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 23242–23248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Michaud, N.R.; Therrien, M.; Cacace, A.; Edsall, L.C.; Spiegel, S.; Rubin, G.M.; Morrison, D.K. KSR stimulates Raf-1 activity in a kinase-independent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 12792–12796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Wang, X.; Wang, T.T.; White, J.H.; Studzinski, G.P. Induction of kinase suppressor of RAS-1(KSR-1) gene by 1, alpha25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human leukemia HL60 cells through a vitamin D response element in the 5'-flanking region. Oncogene 2006, 25, 7078–7085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Wang, X.; Wang, T.T.; White, J.H.; Studzinski, G.P. Expression of human kinase suppressor of Ras 2 (hKSR-2) gene in HL60 leukemia cells is directly upregulated by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and is required for optimal cell differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 2007, 313, 3034–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Wang, X.; Patel, R.; Studzinski, G.P. hKSR-2, a vitamin D-regulated gene, inhibits apoptosis in arabinocytosine-treated HL60 leukemia cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 2798–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Ito, Y.; Mishra, N.C.; Yoshida, K.; Kharbanda, S.; Saxena, S.; Kufe, D. Mitochondrial targeting of JNK/SAPK in the phorbol ester response of myeloid leukemia cells. Cell Death Differ. 2001, 8, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Szabo, E.; Preis, L.H.; Birrer, M.J. Constitutive cJun expression induces partial macrophage differentiation in U-937 cells. Cell Growth Differ. 1994, 5, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  165. Bennett, B.L.; Sasaki, D.T.; Murray, B.W.; O'Leary, E.C.; Sakata, S.T.; Xu, W.; Leisten, J.C.; Motiwala, A.; Pierce, S.; Satoh, Y.; et al. SP600125, an anthrapyrazolone inhibitor of Jun N-terminal kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13681–13686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Wang, Q.; Salman, H.; Danilenko, M.; Studzinski, G.P. Cooperation between antioxidants and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in induction of leukemia HL60 cell differentiation through the JNK/AP-1/Egr-1 pathway. J. Cell. Physiol. 2005, 204, 964–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Jaeschke, A.; Karasarides, M.; Ventura, J.J.; Ehrhardt, A.; Zhang, C.; Flavell, R.A.; Shokat, K.M.; Davis, R.J. JNK2 is a positive regulator of the cJun transcription factor. Mol. Cell 2006, 23, 899–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Sabapathy, K.; Wagner, E.F. JNK2: A negative regulator of cellular proliferation. Cell Cycle 2004, 3, 1520–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Chen-Deutsch, X.; Garay, E.; Zhang, J.; Harrison, J.S.; Studzinski, G.P. c-Jun N-terminal kinase 2 (JNK2) antagonizes the signaling of differentiation by JNK1 in human myeloid leukemia cells resistant to vitamin D. Leuk. Res. 2009, 33, 1372–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Cuenda, A.; Rouse, J.; Doza, Y.N.; Meier, R.; Cohen, P.; Gallagher, T.F.; Young, P.R.; Lee, J.C. SB 203580 is a specific inhibitor of a MAP kinase homologue which is stimulated by cellular stresses and interleukin-1. FEBS Lett. 1995, 364, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Nemoto, S.; Xiang, J.; Huang, S.; Lin, A. Induction of apoptosis by SB202190 through inhibition of p38beta mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 16415–16420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Manthey, C.L.; Wang, S.W.; Kinney, S.D.; Yao, Z. SB202190, a selective inhibitor of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, is a powerful regulator of LPS-induced mRNAs in monocytes. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1998, 64, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Gocek, E.; Kielbinski, M.; Marcinkowska, E. Activation of intracellular signaling pathways is necessary for an increase in VDR expression and its nuclear translocation. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 1751–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Tatake, R.J.; O’Neill, M.M.; Kennedy, C.A.; Wayne, A.L.; Jakes, S.; Wu, D.; Kugler, S.Z., Jr.; Kashem, M.A.; Kaplita, P.; Snow, R.J. Identification of pharmacological inhibitors of the MEK5/ERK5 pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 377, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Yang, Q.; Deng, X.; Lu, B.; Cameron, M.; Fearns, C.; Patricelli, M.P.; Yates, J.R., 3rd; Gray, N.S.; Lee, J.D. Pharmacological inhibition of BMK1 suppresses tumor growth through promyelocytic leukemia protein. Cancer Cell 2010, 18, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Zheng, R.; Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces monocytic differentiation of human myeloid leukemia cells by regulating C/EBPbeta expression through MEF2C. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Razumovskaya, E.; Sun, J.; Ronnstrand, L. Inhibition of MEK5 by BIX02188 induces apoptosis in cells expressing the oncogenic mutant FLT3-ITD. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 412, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Marcinkowska, E.; Wiedlocha, A.; Radzikowski, C. Evidence that phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and p70S6K protein are involved in differentiation of HL60 cells induced by calcitriol. Anticancer Res. 1998, 18, 3507–3514. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  179. Hmama, Z.; Nandan, D.; Sly, L.; Knutson, K.L.; Herrera-Velit, P.; Reiner, N.E. 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced myeloid cell differentiation is regulated by a vitamin D receptor-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling complex. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 190, 1583–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Marcinkowska, E.; Kutner, A. Side-chain modified vitamin D analogs require activation of both PI3-K and Erk1,2 signal transduction pathways to induce differentiation of human promyelocytic leukemia cells. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2002, 49, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  181. Hughes, P.J.; Lee, J.S.; Reiner, N.E.; Brown, G. The vitamin D receptor-mediated activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3Kalpha) plays a role in the 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-stimulated increase in steroid sulphatase activity in myeloid leukaemic cell lines. J. Cell. Biochem. 2008, 103, 1551–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Baurska, H.; Kielbinski, M.; Biecek, P.; Haus, O.; Jazwiec, B.; Kutner, A.; Marcinkowska, E. Monocytic differentiation induced by side-chain modified analogs of vitamin D in ex vivo cells from patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Res. 2014, 38, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Baurska, H.; Klopot, A.; Kielbinski, M.; Chrobak, A.; Wijas, E.; Kutner, A.; Marcinkowska, E. Structure-function analysis of vitamin D2 analogs as potential inducers of leukemia differentiation and inhibitors of prostate cancer proliferation. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 126, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Friedman, A.D. Transcriptional control of granulocyte and monocyte development. Oncogene 2007, 26, 6816–6828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Pham, T.H.; Langmann, S.; Schwarzfischer, L.; El Chartouni, C.; Lichtinger, M.; Klug, M.; Krause, S.W.; Rehli, M. CCAAT enhancer-binding protein beta regulates constitutive gene expression during late stages of monocyte to macrophage differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 21924–21933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Ji, Y.; Studzinski, G.P. Retinoblastoma protein and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta are required for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced monocytic differentiation of HL60 cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Wang, X.; Gocek, E.; Liu, C.G.; Studzinski, G.P. MicroRNAs181 regulate the expression of p27Kip1 in human myeloid leukemia cells induced to differentiate by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 736–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Cuesta, R.; Martinez-Sanchez, A.; Gebauer, F. miR-181a regulates cap-dependent translation of p27(kip1) mRNA in myeloid cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 2841–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Duggal, J.; Harrison, J.S.; Studzinski, G.P.; Wang, X. Involvement of microRNA181a in differentiation and cell cycle arrest induced by a plant-derived antioxidant carnosic acid and vitamin D analog Doxercalciferol in human leukemia cells. Microrna 2012, 1, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Min, D.; Lv, X.B.; Wang, X.; Zhang, B.; Meng, W.; Yu, F.; Hu, H. Downregulation of miR-302c and miR-520c by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment enhances the susceptibility of tumour cells to natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 109, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Iosue, I.; Quaranta, R.; Masciarelli, S.; Fontemaggi, G.; Batassa, E.M.; Bertolami, C.; Ottone, T.; Divona, M.; Salvatori, B.; Padula, F.; et al. Argonaute 2 sustains the gene expression program driving human monocytic differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Gocek, E.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, C.G.; Studzinski, G.P. MicroRNA-32 upregulation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human myeloid leukemia cells leads to Bim targeting and inhibition of AraC-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2012, 71, 6230–6239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Salvatori, B.; Iosue, I.; Djodji Damas, N.; Mangiavacchi, A.; Chiaretti, S.; Messina, M.; Padula, F.; Guarini, A.; Bozzoni, I.; Fazi, F.; et al. Critical Role of c-Myc in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Involving Direct Regulation of miR-26a and Histone Methyltransferase EZH2. Genes Cancer 2011, 2, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Salvatori, B.; Iosue, I.; Mangiavacchi, A.; Loddo, G.; Padula, F.; Chiaretti, S.; Peragine, N.; Bozzoni, I.; Fazi, F.; Fatica, A. The microRNA-26a target E2F7 sustains cell proliferation and inhibits monocytic differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells. Cell Death Dis. 2012, 3, e413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Pesakhov, S.; Khanin, M.; Studzinski, G.P.; Danilenko, M. Distinct combinatorial effects of the plant polyphenols curcumin, carnosic acid, and silibinin on proliferation and apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Nutr. Cancer 2010, 62, 811–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Wang, X.; Pesakhov, S.; Weng, A.; Kafka, M.; Gocek, E.; Nguyen, M.; Harrison, J.S.; Danilenko, M.; Studzinski, G.P. ERK 5/MAPK pathway has a major role in 1alpha,25-(OH) vitamin D-induced terminal differentiation of myeloid leukemia cells. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 144, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Shabtay, A.; Sharabani, H.; Barvish, Z.; Kafka, M.; Amichay, D.; Levy, J.; Sharoni, Y.; Uskokovic, M.R.; Studzinski, G.P.; Danilenko, M. Synergistic antileukemic activity of carnosic acid-rich rosemary extract and the 19-nor Gemini vitamin D analogue in a mouse model of systemic acute myeloid leukemia. Oncology 2008, 75, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Danilenko, M.; Studzinski, G.P. Enhancement by other compounds of the anti-cancer activity of vitamin D3 and its analogs. Exp. Cell Res. 2004, 298, 339–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Zhang, J.; Harrison, J.S.; Uskokovic, M.; Danilenko, M.; Studzinski, G.P. Silibinin can induce differentiation as well as enhance vitamin D3-induced differentiation of human AML cells ex vivo and regulates the levels of differentiation-related transcription factors. Hematol. Oncol. 2010, 28, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  200. Thompson, T.; Danilenko, M.; Vassilev, L.; Studzinski, G.P. Tumor suppressor p53 status does not determine the differentiation-associated G1 cell cycle arrest induced in leukemia cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and antioxidants. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010, 10, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Yang, J.; Ikezoe, T.; Nishioka, C.; Ni, L.; Koeffler, H.P.; Yokoyama, A. Inhibition of mTORC1 by RAD001 (everolimus) potentiates the effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 to induce growth arrest and differentiation of AML cells in vitro and in vivo. Exp. Hematol. 2010, 38, 666–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Lainey, E.; Wolfromm, A.; Sukkurwala, A.Q.; Micol, J.B.; Fenaux, P.; Galluzzi, L.; Kepp, O.; Kroemer, G. EGFR inhibitors exacerbate differentiation and cell cycle arrest induced by retinoic acid and vitamin D3 in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 2978–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Danilenko, M.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Levy, J.; Sharoni, Y.; Studzinski, G.P. Carnosic acid potentiates the antioxidant and prodifferentiation effects of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in leukemia cells but does not promote elevation of basal levels of intracellular calcium. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  204. Callens, C.; Coulon, S.; Naudin, J.; Radford-Weiss, I.; Boissel, N.; Raffoux, E.; Wang, P.H.; Agarwal, S.; Tamouza, H.; Paubelle, E.; et al. Targeting iron homeostasis induces cellular differentiation and synergizes with differentiating agents in acute myeloid leukemia. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 731–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Chen-Deutsch, X.; Kutner, A.; Harrison, J.S.; Studzinski, G.P. The pan-caspase inhibitor Q-VD-OPh has anti-leukemia effects and can interact with vitamin D analogs to increase HPK1 signaling in AML cells. Leuk. Res. 2012, 36, 884–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Jamshidi, F.; Zhang, J.; Harrison, J.S.; Wang, X.; Studzinski, G.P. Induction of differentiation of human leukemia cells by combinations of COX inhibitors and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 involves Raf1 but not Erk 1/2 signaling. Cell Cycle 2008, 7, 917–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Paubelle, E.; Zylbersztejn, F.; Alkhaeir, S.; Suarez, F.; Callens, C.; Dussiot, M.; Isnard, F.; Rubio, M.T.; Damaj, G.; Gorin, N.C.; et al. Deferasirox and vitamin D improves overall survival in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia after demethylating agents failure. PLoS One 2013, 8, e65998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Clinicaltrials.gov. Available online: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home (accessed on 12 October 2014).
  209. Cancer.gov. Available online: http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials (accessed on 12 October 2014).
  210. Leukemia-net.org. Available online: http://www.leukemia-net.org/content/leukemias/aml/aml_trials/database/index_eng (accessed on 12 October 2014).
  211. Ferrero, D.; Crisa, E.; Marmont, F.; Audisio, E.; Frairia, C.; Giai, V.; Gatti, T.; Festuccia, M.; Bruno, B.; Riera, L.; et al. Survival improvement of poor-prognosis AML/MDS patients by maintenance treatment with low-dose chemotherapy and differentiating agents. Ann. Hematol. 2014, 93, 1391–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Autier, P.; Gandini, S. Vitamin D supplementation and total mortality: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch. Intern. Med. 2007, 167, 1730–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Giovannucci, E. Can vitamin D reduce total mortality? Arch. Intern. Med. 2007, 167, 1709–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Lee, H.J.; Muindi, J.R.; Tan, W.; Hu, Q.; Wang, D.; Liu, S.; Wilding, G.E.; Ford, L.A.; Sait, S.N.; Block, A.W.; et al. Low 25(OH) vitamin D3 levels are associated with adverse outcome in newly diagnosed, intensively treated adult acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 2014, 120, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Ramnath, N.; Daignault-Newton, S.; Dy, G.K.; Muindi, J.R.; Adjei, A.; Elingrod, V.L.; Kalemkerian, G.P.; Cease, K.B.; Stella, P.J.; Brenner, D.E.; et al. A phase I/II pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic study of calcitriol in combination with cisplatin and docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2013, 71, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Ma, J.; Ma, Z.; Li, W.; Ma, Q.; Guo, J.; Hu, A.; Li, R.; Wang, F.; Han, S. The mechanism of calcitriol in cancer prevention and treatment. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 4121–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Mazzaferro, S.; Goldsmith, D.; Larsson, T.E.; Massy, Z.A.; Cozzolino, M. Vitamin D metabolites and/or analogs: Which D for which patient? Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2014, 12, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gocek, E.; Studzinski, G.P. The Potential of Vitamin D-Regulated Intracellular Signaling Pathways as Targets for Myeloid Leukemia Therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2015, 4, 504-534. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm4040504

AMA Style

Gocek E, Studzinski GP. The Potential of Vitamin D-Regulated Intracellular Signaling Pathways as Targets for Myeloid Leukemia Therapy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2015; 4(4):504-534. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm4040504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gocek, Elzbieta, and George P. Studzinski. 2015. "The Potential of Vitamin D-Regulated Intracellular Signaling Pathways as Targets for Myeloid Leukemia Therapy" Journal of Clinical Medicine 4, no. 4: 504-534. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm4040504

APA Style

Gocek, E., & Studzinski, G. P. (2015). The Potential of Vitamin D-Regulated Intracellular Signaling Pathways as Targets for Myeloid Leukemia Therapy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 4(4), 504-534. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm4040504

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop