This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Impact of Cystocele Classification and Surgical Method on Treatment Outcome: A Defect-Oriented Surgical Treatment for Cystocele
by
Pawel Szymanowski
Pawel Szymanowski 1,*
,
Wioletta Katarzyna Szepieniec
Wioletta Katarzyna Szepieniec 1,
Andrzej Kuszka
Andrzej Kuszka 1 and
Esra Bilir
Esra Bilir 1,2,3
1
Department of Gynecology and Urogynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul 34450, Türkiye
3
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(1), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010201 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 November 2025
/
Revised: 7 December 2025
/
Accepted: 24 December 2025
/
Published: 26 December 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cystocele remains a prevalent condition with high recurrence rates following conventional native tissue repair. While mesh-based techniques may reduce anatomical recurrence, they are associated with increased complications and regulatory limitations. Our study proposes a defect-oriented approach to cystocele repair to assess whether individualized surgical management based on defect type can improve outcomes, particularly recurrence rates. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of 317 women undergoing cystocele repair (2019–2020) was performed. Patients were classified into five groups according to defect type: lateral defect at level II, central defect at level II, apical defect, mixed apical and lateral defects at level II, and mixed apical and central defects at level II. Surgical techniques, including vaginal mesh repair, laparoscopic or pre-peritoneal Richardson repair, sacropexy, lateral suspension, and combined procedures, were tailored to the identified defect. Postoperative outcomes and recurrence rates were assessed during follow-up visits. Results: The most common defect was apical defect at level II (35.6%) followed by lateral defect (32.8%), mixed apical and lateral (17.7%), central (8.5%), and mixed apical and central (5.4%). The most frequent procedures were vaginal mesh repair (33.8%) and laparoscopic sacropexy (28.7%). In our cohort, the overall recurrence rate was 6.3%, with the highest recurrence observed in the central defect group (11.1%) and lowest in the mixed apical and lateral defect group (0%). Conclusions: A defect-oriented classification and individualized surgical approach for cystocele enables effective, durable repair with low recurrence rates. Precise identification of the anatomical defect, rather than the routine use of hysterectomy or mesh, should guide surgical planning to optimize functional and anatomical outcomes.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Szymanowski, P.; Szepieniec, W.K.; Kuszka, A.; Bilir, E.
Impact of Cystocele Classification and Surgical Method on Treatment Outcome: A Defect-Oriented Surgical Treatment for Cystocele. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 201.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010201
AMA Style
Szymanowski P, Szepieniec WK, Kuszka A, Bilir E.
Impact of Cystocele Classification and Surgical Method on Treatment Outcome: A Defect-Oriented Surgical Treatment for Cystocele. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(1):201.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010201
Chicago/Turabian Style
Szymanowski, Pawel, Wioletta Katarzyna Szepieniec, Andrzej Kuszka, and Esra Bilir.
2026. "Impact of Cystocele Classification and Surgical Method on Treatment Outcome: A Defect-Oriented Surgical Treatment for Cystocele" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 1: 201.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010201
APA Style
Szymanowski, P., Szepieniec, W. K., Kuszka, A., & Bilir, E.
(2026). Impact of Cystocele Classification and Surgical Method on Treatment Outcome: A Defect-Oriented Surgical Treatment for Cystocele. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(1), 201.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010201
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.