1. Introduction
Sebaceous hyperplasia, characterized by benign proliferation of sebaceous glands, predominantly manifests on the face, upper neck, and chest of middle-aged to elderly individuals [
1]. Sebaceous glands are composed of acini connected to a secretory duct [
2]. Sebum production takes place within the sebocyte, where lipids accumulate throughout its life. Eventually, these contents are discharged into the main excretory duct. Clinically, these lesions present as small, yellowish, dome-shaped papules with a distinctive umbilication, often measuring 2–4 mm in diameter. The central umbilication represents the ductal opening, and telangiectasia may be present. These lesions pose a diagnostic challenge as they can be easily mistaken for more serious conditions like basal cell carcinomas [
3,
4]. Dermoscopically, sebaceous hyperplasia can be identified by specific features. The cumulus sign, an asymmetrical milky-white structure, indicates accumulated sebum due to gland proliferation. The “bonbon toffee sign”, a central umbilication surrounded by the cumulus sign, was observed in a significant proportion of cases, providing an easily recognizable dermatoscopic feature [
5]. Crown vessels, fine non-arborizing branching vessels surrounding white or yellow nodules, are also characteristic of sebaceous hyperplasia [
6]. The differentiation of sebaceous hyperplasia from other skin lesions, including sebaceous adenoma, sebaceous carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and molluscum contagiosum, is crucial and is often aided by dermatoscopy [
3].
The pathophysiology of sebaceous hyperplasia is complex and multifactorial. Hormonal changes, particularly those related to androgens, play a significant role [
7,
8]. During puberty, increased androgen activity leads to the enlargement and activation of sebaceous glands [
9]. In contrast, the aging process is marked by a reduction in androgen levels and a consequent decrease in sebocyte regeneration, contributing to the hyperplasia of facial sebaceous glands [
10]. Intrinsic factors, including insulin, Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH), and hydrocortisone, have also been associated with increased proliferation of sebocytes [
11]. Additionally, external factors like ultraviolet radiation and immune suppression, particularly with drugs like ciclosporin “A”, play a contributory role in SH proliferation [
7,
12].
Current treatments for sebaceous hyperplasia focus primarily on cosmetic improvement, encompassing a range of options such as shave excision, isotretinoin therapy, cryotherapy, and various laser treatments [
11,
13,
14,
15]. However, these methods often result in recurrence, scarring, or other complications, indicating a need for more effective and enduring therapeutic approaches. In this context, High-Frequency Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) emerges as a novel and promising method [
16].
HIFU offers the potential for a less invasive, more targeted treatment, minimizing the drawbacks of traditional approaches. High-Frequency Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) exerts its therapeutic effects through a combination of thermal and mechanical mechanisms. The thermal effect arises from the absorption of ultrasonic energy, leading to rapid heating of tissues at the focal point, with temperatures exceeding 60 °C, causing protein denaturation, coagulative necrosis, and cell death. The mechanical effects are primarily mediated by acoustic cavitation, where the alternating high-pressure (compression) and low-pressure (rarefaction) phases of the ultrasound wave generate microbubbles within the targeted tissue. These microbubbles undergo oscillation and violent collapse (inertial cavitation), producing intense shear forces, shock waves, and localized mechanical disruption of cellular structures, independent of thermal injury. Additionally, acoustic radiation forces generated by the focused ultrasound waves can induce microstreaming and tissue displacement, contributing to vascular occlusion and increased cellular stress. This combination of thermal ablation and mechanical stress results in precise, localized tissue destruction, making HIFU an effective modality for non-invasive treatments across dermatological, oncological, and aesthetic applications [
17]. This paper aims to explore the efficacy and safety of HIFU in the treatment of sebaceous hyperplasia, examining its potential to revolutionize the management of this common dermatological condition, thereby improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
2. Materials and Methods
Participants diagnosed with sebaceous hyperplasia were recruited and provided informed consent, adhering to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration II. In this study, six participants were enrolled, comprising five women and one man, aged 39, 40, 40, 41, 60, and 60 years old. Collectively, these individuals presented with a total of 33 sebaceous hyperplasia lesions. Prior to HIFU treatment, lesions were evaluated using a 20 MHz Dermascan® C ultrasound system and the FotofinderMedicam 1000 (FotoFinder Systems GmbH, Bad Birnbach, Germany) for clinical assessment, ensuring precise characterization of each lesion. Collectively, these individuals presented with a total of 33 sebaceous hyperplasia lesions, providing a diverse sample for the evaluation of the HIFU treatment’s efficacy.
The HIFU treatments were performed with the TOOsonix System ONE-M, operating at 20 MHz [
18]. This system features advanced real-time optical monitoring, integrating dermoscopic observation for accurate energy delivery. The transducer chamber was prepared with non-gaseous distilled water, sealed with polyethylene film, and acoustic coupling was achieved with ultrasound gel. We used a 0.8 mm probe, administering HIFU doses of 1 Joule per dose in a contiguous pattern, with each dose lasting 150 ms. A spatial separation of 1 mm between doses ensured comprehensive coverage while preserving the tissue.
The HIFU device, capable of inducing localized heating to approximately 60–65 °C, was expected to cause cell necrosis and denaturate fibrous tissue. This noninvasive approach aimed at efficiently targeting features in the dermis and epidermis. Real-time monitoring via an integrated dermoscopic system displayed on a computer screen facilitated the progress tracking of the treatment. No pre-treatment anesthesia was used, based on prior experience.
3. Results
In dermoscopic terms, sebaceous hyperplasia presents as whitish-yellowish nodular structures, typically encircled by a crown-like arrangement of blood vessels. These vessels notably do not traverse the lesion’s central part.
Figure 1 presents a pre-treatment ultrasound measurement of SH in one of our patients, performed using the Dermascan
® C ultrasound system. SH typically appears as a hyperechoic structure within the upper dermis on ultrasound imaging. Accurately determining lesion depth is a crucial aspect of pre-treatment assessment, as individual variations exist. While most cases of SH are superficially localized (0.3–1.0 mm), some lesions may extend deeper, depending on their anatomical location. In our patient cohort, SH lesions were found at depths ranging from 0.3 mm to 0.7 mm. Based on these measurements, a 0.8 mm probe was used for all procedures to ensure optimal targeting and treatment efficacy.
Post-procedure, an inflammatory reaction is observed, characterized by pink discoloration and a pattern of reticular and linear branching vessels. Dermoscopic follow-up often reveals white amorphous areas and white lines indicative of fibrosis, arranged perpendicular to the skin’s surface. Over time, a transient depression may form at the treatment site, which eventually undergoes a regenerative process, restoring the skin’s original contour.
Dermoscopic assessment after HIFU therapy showed that the majority of patients achieved complete resolution of sebaceous hyperplasia, as depicted in
Figure 2,
Figure 3,
Figure 4 and
Figure 5. Notably, the characteristic dermoscopic appearance of these lesions as whitish-yellowish nodular structures encircled by a distinct vascular pattern known as the “crown sign” was observed to resolve following treatment.
Figure 2 illustrates an ideal healing process with an excellent post-procedural outcome, both macroscopically (C) and dermatoscopically (D). While most cases resulted in total lesion clearance without any adverse effects, a subset of patients developed minor side effects, which were meticulously documented in
Table 1.
Figure 3 shows an SH lesion previously treated with a CO
2 laser in a female patient, which recurred after one month. In our case, the lesion was completely removed both macroscopically (C) and dermatoscopically (D). However, white lines indicating scarring are visible. Other side effects included the formation of small telangiectasias, indicated by
Figure 5, as well as minor scarring and hyperpigmentation, all of which were localized and limited to the area of treatment.
Figure 4 shows the complete macroscopic removal of the lesion (C). However, under dermatoscope (D), a small remnant of a large arborizing vessel is visible. The lesion requires further follow-up to exclude potential recurrence in the future. This also highlights the role of dermoscopy in monitoring treatment outcomes and detecting lesions with a higher risk of recurrence.
Patients universally reported the treatment to be virtually painless, likening the sensation to that of a slight needle prick. This patient feedback highlights the tolerability and minimal discomfort associated with the HIFU procedure. Over time, dermoscopic follow-up demonstrated a transient tissue depression at the treatment sites, which progressively regenerated, reinstating the skin’s original contour, as illustrated in
Figure 2,
Figure 3,
Figure 4 and
Figure 5. The images showcase the typical inflammatory response characterized by pink discoloration and a pattern of reticular and linear branching vessels, which transition to white fibrotic lines and amorphous areas perpendicular to the skin surface, indicating the onset of the healing process.
In the study involving six patients with a total of 33 sebaceous hyperplasia lesions, the results demonstrated the effectiveness of HIFU treatment. Approximately 87.9% (n = 29) of the lesions achieved a complete response (CR), signifying complete clearance, while approximately 12.1% (n =4) exhibited a partial response (PR) with a partial reduction in size or severity. None of the lesions remained in a stable condition (SC) or showed progressive condition (PC), underscoring the favorable outcomes and safety profile of HIFU therapy for sebaceous hyperplasia in this patient cohort.
4. Discussion
The present study’s exploration into the utility of High-Frequency Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for treating sebaceous hyperplasia (SH) marks a significant contribution to dermatological therapeutics. Our findings, showcasing HIFU’s efficacy in lesion reduction with minimal adverse effects, resonate with the emerging narrative in dermatological research that advocates for less invasive treatment modalities. This alignment is particularly evident when juxtaposed with the existing literature on CO
2 laser treatments for SH, which, while effective, often come with a higher incidence of complications such as scarring and pigmentation changes [
19].
The efficacy of High-Frequency Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in treating sebaceous hyperplasia, as demonstrated in our study, aligns with emerging trends in dermatological therapy, particularly in non-invasive skin treatments. HIFU’s utility, as explored in diverse contexts ranging from benign vascular tumors to facial skin rejuvenation, highlights its versatility [
20,
21,
22,
23,
24]. Even larger nodules, such as neurofibromas in the course of neurofibromatosis type I, can be effectively treated using this method [
25]. There are also preliminary studies demonstrating the efficacy of HIFU in treating malignant tumors, such as basal cell carcinoma, as well as premalignant conditions like actinic keratosis [
26,
27]. Given its ability to precisely target superficial and dermal structures, HIFU may also hold potential for treatingtrichodiscomas in Birt−Hogg−Dubé syndrome, angiofibromas in tuberous sclerosis, as well as cosmetic concerns such as milia (excluding the periorbital region).These applications further underscore the growing role of HIFU in dermatology as a non-invasive and selective therapeutic approach.
Moreover, the advancements in diagnostic accuracy for sebaceous hyperplasia, as indicated by Lenoir et al., underscore the importance of precise therapeutic interventions [
28]. HIFU, in this regard, offers a targeted approach, minimizing the risk of overtreatment—a common challenge in managing skin lesions [
29,
30]. Our results emphasize the minimal side effects and high patient satisfaction associated with HIFU. This aspect is particularly significant given the chronic and often recurrent nature of sebaceous hyperplasia, where patient quality of life is a key treatment outcome [
11]. In the event that not all white-yellow deposits within sebaceous hyperplasia (SH) lesions are fully eliminated, there is a possibility of recurrence, potentially necessitating another round of treatment [
19]. Thus, the precision afforded by 20 MHz HIFU is crucial; it allows for the application of high-power ultrasound energy to very small focal targets in the dermis, thereby ensuring precise confinement of thermal lesions and reducing the likelihood of incomplete treatment and subsequent recurrence [
31,
32]. In particular, the use of HIFU for the sebaceous gland removal was found to have impressive outcomes and provide minimal damage to surrounding tissues.
Further observations and studies are needed to better understand the healing process following HIFU treatment. It is known that the healing process may depend on the type of lesion itself—for example, sebaceous hyperplasia statistically heals faster than seborrheic keratosis or sebaceous nevus [
33]. Healing time may also vary, depending on the lesion’s location within the face. Lesions on bony prominences (e.g., the forehead or zygomatic bone) may take longer to heal and result in a less favorable cosmetic outcome compared to those in concave areas (e.g., the temple). So far, we have estimated that the average healing time for sebaceous hyperplasia (SH) is approximately three weeks. The final outcome may also be influenced by the baseline skin condition (such as the degree of photodamage) and post-treatment skincare. As with lasers and other physical methods for removing skin lesions, photoprotection plays a crucial role in preventing hyperpigmentation and telangiectasias, which can be exacerbated by UV radiation.
The revised discussion emphasizes the patient-centric approach of the study, highlighting the minimal invasiveness and patient satisfaction with HIFU treatment for sebaceous hyperplasia (SH). It aligns with current trends in dermatology that prioritize patient quality of life and clinical efficacy. This study reinforces HIFU as a non-invasive, viable alternative for SH treatment, encouraging further research into its long-term efficacy and comparison with other methods. The study opens avenues for exploring HIFU’s broader dermatological applications, suggesting a significant impact on clinical practices by offering a safe, effective, patient-friendly treatment option.
5. Conclusions
While we acknowledge the limitation of a small patient cohort and the associated challenges in interpreting the results, our findings demonstrate the promising potential of HIFU for the treatment of sebaceous gland hyperplasia. This study provides a foundation for future controlled trials with larger patient groups, which will be essential for confirming its long-term efficacy and safety. Additionally, comparative studies with CO2 laser and chemical peels—currently the most common treatment modalities for SH—will help establish HIFU’s relative effectiveness and clinical applicability. Our results indicate that 20 MHz HIFU is an effective, non-invasive alternative for SH treatment, offering high lesion clearance rates with minimal discomfort and side effects. Given its precise targeting capabilities and favorable safety profile, HIFU has the potential to become a valuable addition to the dermatological treatment landscape. Future studies should focus on optimizing treatment parameters and evaluating long-term outcomes to further define its role in clinical practice.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, B.W. and J.C.; methodology, B.W., N.S. and J.C.; investigation, B.W. and J.C.; writing—original draft, B.W. and N.S.; writing—review and editing, A.P.-A., P.D. and J.C.; supervision, N.S., A.P.-A., P.D. and J.C.; project administration, J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, as the treatments were performed on a CE-marked medical device within the scope of its intended purpose (on-label), following standard settings as described in the device’s Instructions for Use (IFUs) and in accordance with routine clinical practice.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data are contained within the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Farci, F.; Mahabal, G.D. Hyperkeratosis. In Encyclopedia of Parasitology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; p. 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zouboulis, C.C. Sebaceous gland receptors. Dermato-Endocrinol. 2009, 1, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Papadimitriou, I.; Vakirlis, E.; Sotiriou, E.; Bakirtzi, K.; Lallas, A.; Ioannides, D. Sebaceous Neoplasms. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonald, S.K.; Goh, M.S.; Chong, A.H. Successful treatment of cyclosporine-induced sebaceous hyperplasia with oral isotretinoin in two renal transplant recipients. Australas. J. Dermatol. 2011, 52, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oztas, P.; Polat, M.; Oztas, M.; Alli, N.; Ustun, H. Bonbon toffee sign: A new dermatoscopic feature for sebaceous hyperplasia. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2008, 22, 1200–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín, J.M.; Bella-Navarro, R.; Jordá, E. Vascular Patterns in Dermoscopy. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (Engl. Ed.) 2012, 103, 357–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zampeli, V.A.; Makrantonaki, E.; Tzellos, T.; Zouboulis, C.C. New Pharmaceutical Concepts for Sebaceous Gland Diseases: Implementing Today’s Pre-Clinical Data into Tomorrow’s Daily Clinical Practice. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2012, 13, 1898–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azmahani, A.; Nakamura, Y.; McNamara, K.M.; Sasano, H. The Role of Androgen Under Normal and Pathological Conditions in Sebaceous Glands: The Possibility of Target Therapy. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2016, 9, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hogan, D.; Mohammad, S. Sebaceous hyperplasia. Expert Rev. Dermatol. 2011, 6, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussein, L.; Perrett, C.M. Treatment of sebaceous gland hyperplasia: A review of the literature. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2021, 32, 866–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simmons, B.J.; Griffith, R.D.; Falto-Aizpurua, L.A.; Bray, F.N.; Nouri, K. Light and laser therapies for the treatment of sebaceous gland hyperplasia a review of the literature. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2015, 29, 2080–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zouboulis, C.C.; Boschnakow, A. Chronological ageing and photoageing of the human sebaceous gland. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2001, 26, 600–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perrett, C.M.; McGregor, J.; Barlow, R.J.; Karran, P.; Proby, C.; Harwood, C.A. Topical photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate to treat sebaceous hyperplasia in an organ transplant recipient. Arch. Dermatol. 2006, 142, 781–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gold, M.H. Continuing Medical Education Article–Skin Treatment: Photodynamic Therapy: Indications and Treatment. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2008, 28, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tagliolatto, S.; de O. Santos Neto, O.; de A. Alchorne, M.M.; Enokihara, M.Y. Sebaceous hyperplasia: Systemic treatment with isotretinoin. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2015, 90, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zawada, T.; Bove, T. Strongly Focused HIFU Transducers With Simultaneous Optical Observation for Treatment of Skin at 20 MHz. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2022, 48, 1309–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Calik, J.; Migdal, M.; Zawada, T.; Bove, T. Treatment of Seborrheic Keratosis by High Frequency Focused Ultrasound—An Early Experience with 11 Consecutive Cases. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2022, 15, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bove, T.; Zawada, T.; Jessen, A.; Poli, M.; Serup, J. Removal of Common Warts by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: An Introductory Observation. Case Rep. Dermatol. 2021, 13, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, A.; Taylor, M.B.; Sotoodian, B. Treatment of sebaceous hyperplasia by laser modalities: A review of the literature and presentation of our experience with erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG). J. Drugs Dermatol. 2020, 19, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calik, J.; Zawada, T.; Bove, T. Treatment of superficial benign vascular tumors by high intensity focused ultrasound: Observations in two illustrative cases. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2022, 21, 3371–3379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ayatollahi, A.; Gholami, J.; Saberi, M.; Hosseini, H.; Firooz, A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for face and neck rejuvenation. Lasers Med. Sci. 2020, 35, 1007–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lio, M.L.; Chang, C.C.; Chuang, A.D.C.; Tsai, L.C.; Chen, C.C. Quantified Facial Rejuvenation Utilizing High Intense Focus Ultrasound with Multiple Penetrative Depths. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2022, 15, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serdar, Z.A.; Karabay, E.A.; Tatlıparmak, A.; Aksoy, B. Efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound in facial and neck rejuvenation. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2020, 19, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ko, E.J.; Hong, J.Y.; Kwon, T.R.; Choi, E.J.; Jang, Y.J.; Choi, S.Y.; Yoo, K.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, B.J. Efficacy and safety of non-invasive body tightening with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Ski. Res. Technol. 2017, 23, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wozniak, B.; Bove, T.; Zawada, T.; Calik, J. Treatment of Cutaneous Neurofibromas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Case Rep. Dermatol. 2023, 15, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Calik, J.; Sauer, N.; Woźniak, B.; Wojnar, A.; Pietkiewicz, P.; Dzięgiel, P. Pilot Study on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for Basal Cell Carcinoma: Effectiveness and Safety. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Seyed Jafari, S.M.; Cazzaniga, S.; Bossart, S.; Feldmeyer, L.; Pelloni, L.; van Rhyn, M.; Angermeier, S.; Adatto, M.; Hunger, R.E.; Heidemeyer, K. Efficacy Assessment of the High-Frequency High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound as a New Treatment for Actinic Keratosis. Dermatology 2022, 238, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lenoir, C.; Diet, G.; Cinotti, E.; Tognetti, L.; Orte Cano, C.; Rocq, L.; Trépant, A.L.; Monnier, J.; Perez-Anker, J.; Rubegni, P.; et al. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography of sebaceous hyperplasia: A case series. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2021, 35, e509–e511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Welsh, O.; Welsh, E.C.; Cárdenas, J.A. Aesthetic/cosmetic cryosurgery. In Dermatological Cryosurgery Cryotherapy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swann, M.H. Aesthetic cryotherapy. In Aesthetic Medicine: Art Techniques; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bove, T.; Zawada, T.; Serup, J.; Jessen, A.; Poli, M. High-Frequency (20 MHz) Focused Ultrasound: A Novel Method for Noninvasive Tattoo Removal. Curr. Probl. Dermatol. 2022, 56, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bove, T.; Zawada, T.; Serup, J.; Jessen, A.; Poli, M. High-frequency (20-MHz) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) system for dermal intervention: Preclinical evaluation in skin equivalents. Skin Res. Technol. 2019, 25, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Calik, J.; Zawada, T.; Bove, T.; Dzięgiel, P.; Pogorzelska-Antkowiak, A.; Mackiewicz, J.; Woźniak, B.; Sauer, N. Healing Process after High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Benign Skin Lesions: Dermoscopic Analysis and Treatment Guidelines. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).