Next Article in Journal
Extreme Preterm Delivery Between 24+0 and 27+6 Weeks: Factors Affecting Perinatal Outcome
Next Article in Special Issue
Stent Retriever as Distal Filter for Endovascular Management of Acute Atherosclerosis-Related Carotid Occlusions: Preliminary Findings with a Novel Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Systematic Review of Clinical Outcome Parameters of Conservative Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Multidisciplinary Treatment Recommendations
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Pre-Admission Antiplatelet Therapy in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Double-Edged Sword

J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(4), 1061; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041061
by Jessica Seetge 1, Balázs Cséke 2, Zsófia Nozomi Karádi 1, Edit Bosnyák 1 and László Szapáry 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(4), 1061; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041061
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 18 January 2025 / Accepted: 6 February 2025 / Published: 7 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current Status and Future Challenges)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

File attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

It can be improved.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This study provides important insights into the impact of APT on the prognosis of patients with cryptogenic stroke. The results indicate that, contrary to traditional assumptions about the protective role of APT, pre-admission APT is associated with poorer functional outcomes within 90 days. The study employs propensity score matching and sensitivity analysis to adjust for confounding factors, including pre-stroke functional status, stroke severity, and smoking status. However, there are still some issues in the article that need to be addressed.

1. I suggest providing a clearer definition of "Pre-admission Antiplatelet Therapy," such as specifying it as the use of antiplatelet medications prescribed and continuously taken by patients before arriving at the hospital (e.g., at home or during outpatient follow-ups). The definition of the admission time point may vary across different countries and regions.

2. It would be better to include the types of antiplatelet medications used in the table for a more detailed presentation.

3. In Table 1, the standard deviation of Onset-to-door time greatly exceeds its mean, indicating a likely skewed distribution. The data should be presented as the median with interquartile range (IQR) and analyzed using non-parametric tests.

4. In Table 3, the estimates for ADE no pre-admission APT and ADE pre-admission APT are lower than the lower bound of their confidence intervals. Please double-check the accuracy of these data.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

All the previous issues have been resolved, and I have no more questions.

 

Back to TopTop