4.1. Findings
This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between physical activity, BMI, and depressive and anxiety symptoms in Romanian medical students. This research also examined the potential roles of sleep quality and screen time as contributing factors. The study aimed to clarify which modifiable behaviors are most influential for this specific population to inform targeted prevention strategies.
The finding of a negative correlation between overall physical activity and depressive symptoms among students is strongly supported by current evidence. Multiple large-scale studies and meta-analyses demonstrate that higher levels of physical activity are associated with lower depressive symptom scores in university and high school populations, with the relationship being dose-dependent—students with low physical activity consistently report higher depressive symptoms compared to those with moderate or high activity levels [
9,
35,
36,
37,
38,
39,
40]. While our bivariate findings align with literature suggesting PA is a protective factor, this effect was not supported in our more comprehensive multivariable model. This suggests that the relationship between total PA volume and depression may be mediated or confounded by other variables, such as sleep quality, in this specific cohort. The literature also indicates that physical activity exerts its protective effect on depression through mediating factors such as self-esteem, positive psychological capital, and social support, which further reduce depressive symptoms [
35,
37]. Specific depressive symptoms most affected by physical activity include anhedonia and fatigue, with a monotonic dose–response relationship observed for these domains [
41].
Regarding anxiety symptoms, the evidence is less consistent. While some studies report that physically inactive students have higher anxiety scores, the association between physical activity and anxiety is generally weaker and often not statistically significant after adjustment for confounders [
38,
42].
There is robust evidence that walking, even at light intensity and modest frequency, is associated with a significant reduction in depressive symptoms. Large-scale meta-analyses and cohort studies consistently demonstrate an inverse, curvilinear dose–response relationship: the greatest mental health benefits are observed when individuals move from no activity to some activity, with diminishing returns at higher levels of physical activity [
9,
12,
43]. For example, accumulating a volume of physical activity equivalent to 2.5 h of brisk walking per week is associated with a 25% lower risk of depression, and even half that dose confers an 18% lower risk compared to inactivity [
9].
Daily step count data further support these findings: adults who achieve 5000 or more steps per day report fewer depressive symptoms, and those exceeding 7500 steps per day have a 42% lower prevalence of depression compared to those with fewer than 5000 steps [
12]. Importantly, these protective effects are evident with walking and do not require vigorous exercise, making walking a highly accessible and low-cost intervention.
Among college students, higher frequency and duration of walking are specifically correlated with lower depressive symptom scores and engaging in physical activity more than three times per week for 30–59 min is associated with a significantly lower detection rate of cognitive symptoms and suicidal ideation [
36,
39,
44]. The relationship is partially mediated by improvements in sleep quality and behavioral activation, but the direct effect of physical activity remains substantial [
36,
44].
In summary, even light-intensity physical activity such as walking is a protective factor against depression, and increasing walking days per week and minutes per day can be recommended as a practical, evidence-based strategy for reducing depressive symptoms in students and adults.
Current evidence supports sex-specific recommendations for physical activity to support mental health in students. Multiple large-scale studies demonstrate that for female students, walking time and lower-intensity activities are more consistently associated with fewer depressive symptoms, while for male students, higher-intensity physical activity (such as moderate-to-vigorous exercise or activities with higher total metabolic equivalents) shows a stronger inverse relationship with depressive symptoms [
45,
46,
47,
48,
49,
50].
For females, walking more than once per week is associated with lower depression levels, and reallocating sedentary time to walking or moderate-intensity activity is beneficial [
45,
46]. In contrast, for males, engaging in strength or vigorous exercise more than once per week, or increasing overall moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, is linked to reduced depressive symptoms [
45,
46,
48,
49]. These patterns are consistent across diverse populations and are robust to adjustment for confounders.
The literature also highlights that the context and type of physical activity matter: leisure-time physical activity is more protective for mood than occupational or household activity, and the benefits of physical activity for mental health are greater when tailored to sex-specific preferences and physiological responses [
50].
In summary, recommendations for physical activity to support mental health should be tailored by sex: emphasizing walking and moderate activity for females, and higher-intensity or strength-based activity for males, to optimize reductions in depressive symptoms among student populations.
Poor sleep quality is a strong, independent predictor of both depressive and anxiety symptoms among medical students, as consistently demonstrated in recent cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Multiple analyses using validated instruments (e.g., Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)) show that poor sleep quality is directly associated with increased risk and severity of depression and anxiety, even after controlling for confounders such as sex, academic year, and psychosocial stressors [
51,
52,
53,
54,
55,
56,
57,
58,
59,
60,
61].
Longitudinal data further support a bidirectional relationship: poor sleep quality predicts future onset and worsening of depressive and anxiety symptoms, and conversely, baseline depression and anxiety can worsen sleep quality over time [
54,
62]. Mediation analyses indicate that sleep quality often serves as a key mechanism linking stress, negative life events, and psychological distress to mental health outcomes in this population [
52,
53,
57,
59,
60,
61].
The clinical implication is that interventions targeting sleep quality—such as cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, sleep hygiene education, and resilience-building—may be effective strategies to mitigate depressive and anxiety symptoms in medical students. These findings reinforce the robust connection between sleep and mental health, underscoring the importance of routine screening and integrated management of sleep disturbances in this high-risk group.
Current evidence indicates that the association between body mass index (BMI) and depressive or anxiety symptoms is complex and context-dependent. Large population-based studies consistently report a U-shaped relationship, with both underweight and obesity associated with increased risk of depression, while normal BMI is associated with lower risk [
63,
64,
65,
66]. However, when confounding factors such as lifestyle, academic stress, and internet use are accounted for—particularly in narrow cohorts like medical students—the direct association between BMI and depressive or anxiety symptoms may attenuate or become non-significant [
22,
67]. It is important to acknowledge that the narrow distribution of BMI in our specific student population (median 22.41 kg/m
2) may have reduced the power to detect subtle or curvilinear associations, which is a common limitation in similar homogenous samples.
In medical students, academic burnout and internet addiction have been shown to mediate the relationship between overweight/obesity and mental health symptoms, suggesting that lifestyle and psychosocial factors may be more influential than BMI alone in this population [
22]. This finding challenges the generalizability of population-based associations to specific subgroups, where unique stressors and coping mechanisms may play a larger role.
Regarding screen time, while it is a significant predictor of depressive symptoms in some studies, its explanatory value is modest and inconsistent across different populations and study designs [
65]. Screen time may interact with other factors such as social comparison, body image concerns, and academic stress, but it does not fully account for the variance in depressive symptoms.
In summary, the link between BMI and mental health is less clear in narrowly defined cohorts like medical students when lifestyle factors are considered, and screen time, although relevant, is a modest and inconsistent predictor of depressive symptoms.
While physical activity, including walking, is robustly associated with reduced depressive symptoms, mediation analyses have shown mixed results regarding the roles of sleep and social media use.
For sleep, some studies have found partial mediation, indicating that improvements in sleep quality can explain part of the mental health benefits of physical activity, but not all. For example, Kaseva et al. found that sleep problems mediated approximately 30–36% of the association between physical activity and depressive symptoms, but this effect was attenuated after adjusting for baseline depression, suggesting that other pathways are also important [
68]. Similarly, Barham et al. reported that sleep health mediated only 19% of the association between physical activity and depression symptoms, indicating that the majority of the effect is direct or mediated by other factors [
69].
Regarding social media use, Wang et al. demonstrated that physical activity is associated with lower depression and anxiety, and that high social media use is associated with worse mental health outcomes but did not establish social media use as a mediator between physical activity and mental health [
70]. Systematic reviews further support that while social media use and sleep quality are independently associated with mental health, their roles as mediators in the physical activity–mental health relationship are limited or inconsistent [
71,
72].
Therefore, the finding that the beneficial effect of walking on mental health is not accounted for by improvements in sleep or alterations in social media use is supported by current evidence, which suggests that walking likely exerts its mental health benefits through direct physiological and psychological mechanisms, rather than primarily through changes in sleep or social media behaviors.
4.2. Theoretical and Practical Implications
The association between physical activity and mental health is indeed not a one-size-fits-all phenomenon. Recent evidence demonstrates that both the type and intensity of physical activity, as well as sex, can moderate mental health benefits. For example, large-scale cross-sectional and meta-analytic studies show that leisure-time physical activity—especially activities such as walking, running, cycling, and team sports—are more strongly associated with reduced odds of depression and improved mental health than aggregate measures like total metabolic equivalents (METs) alone [
73,
74,
75].
Importantly, sex-specific differences have been identified: vigorous-intensity activity is more strongly associated with reduced depression and anxiety in men, while walking and moderate-intensity activity confer greater emotional well-being benefits in women [
76]. These findings challenge the traditional approach of using aggregate weekly METs as the sole metric and support the use of activity-specific and domain-specific measures in both research and clinical recommendations [
74,
76].
Furthermore, the dose–response relationship is curvilinear, with the greatest mental health benefits observed when moving from inactivity to low or moderate levels of activity, and diminishing returns at higher doses [
9,
77]. The qualitative aspects of activity—such as social interaction, outdoor environment, and personal preference—also mediate these effects [
73,
74,
78].
In summary, future research and clinical practice should prioritize nuanced, activity-specific, and sex-sensitive physical activity metrics rather than relying solely on aggregate METs, to optimize mental health outcomes.
The lack of a significant association between body mass index (BMI) and depressive or anxiety symptoms in medical student cohorts is consistent with emerging evidence that the well-established U-shaped relationship between BMI and mental health in the general population may not generalize to more homogenous, young adult populations such as medical students. Large population-based studies consistently demonstrate a U-shaped or dose-dependent association between BMI and depression, with both underweight and obesity conferring increased risk for depressive symptoms, and sometimes anxiety, across diverse adult and adolescent samples [
63,
64,
65,
66,
79,
80,
81]. However, these associations are often attenuated or absent in younger, healthier, and more socioeconomically homogenous cohorts.
Recent studies specifically in medical students suggest that while overweight and obesity may be associated with increased depressive and anxiety symptoms, these relationships are frequently mediated by behavioral and psychosocial factors such as academic burnout and internet addiction, rather than BMI alone [
22]. In young adult twin cohorts, elevated BMI is associated with poorer physical well-being and, to a lesser extent, depressive symptoms, but not with anxiety or social well-being, further supporting the notion that BMI-mental health associations are context-dependent and may be less pronounced in healthy, educated young adult [
67,
82].
These findings support the importance of prioritizing behavioral and psychosocial risk factors—such as academic stress, burnout, and maladaptive coping behaviors—over BMI alone when assessing mental health risk in medical students and similar cohorts. This approach aligns with the evolving understanding that mental health in young adults is multifactorial and less directly tied to BMI than in the general population.
The medical literature consistently demonstrates a strong and independent association between poor sleep quality and increased depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in high-stress populations such as those exposed to chronic stressors or pandemic conditions [
54,
62,
83,
84,
85,
86]. Sleep quality is repeatedly shown to be a central determinant of mental health, with bidirectional relationships observed: poor sleep predicts future depression and anxiety, and these symptoms also worsen sleep quality over time [
54,
62].
Importantly, several studies indicate that sleep quality functions as a distinct and independent pathway to mental health, rather than merely mediating the effects of physical activity on depression and anxiety. For example, while physical activity is associated with improved sleep and reduced depressive symptoms, mediation analyses reveal that sleep only partially mediates this relationship, and in some cases, the mediation effect disappears after adjusting for baseline depressive symptoms [
68,
69]. Other studies show that the negative impact of poor sleep quality on depressive symptoms is amplified in physically inactive individuals, but sleep and physical activity exert independent effects [
6]. Furthermore, emotion regulation and adaptive coping strategies are independently associated with mental health outcomes, and their benefits are contingent on sleep quality, further supporting the notion that sleep is a unique pathway [
84,
87].
In summary, sleep quality is a central and independent determinant of mental well-being in high-stress populations, and its effects on depression and anxiety are not fully explained by its relationship with physical activity. This underscores the importance of directly targeting sleep quality in interventions aimed at improving mental health.
The most significant practical implication of our findings is the need for sex-specific recommendations for physical activity in mental health interventions for medical students. The study showed that for female students, walking time was a significant protective factor against depressive symptoms, while for male students, higher overall physical activity (Total METs) was more strongly associated with fewer depressive symptoms. This suggests that “one-size-fits-all” advice on physical activity may be less effective. By tailoring interventions, such as promoting accessible, light-intensity activities like walking for female students and encouraging vigorous exercise for male students, medical programs could achieve higher engagement and better mental health outcomes. This approach moves beyond generic guidance and offers a more personalized, evidence-based strategy to address the unique needs of different student groups.
A significant practical implication of this study is the clear roadmap it provides for universities and medical schools to develop evidence-based interventions that focus on modifiable lifestyle factors. Our findings, which found no significant association between BMI and depressive or anxiety symptoms, align with current evidence that suggests poor sleep quality and insufficient physical activity are highly prevalent and strongly associated with adverse health outcomes in university students, independent of BMI alone [
88,
89,
90,
91]. Therefore, prevention programs should prioritize improving sleep quality and increasing physical activity levels, as these are actionable and have demonstrated benefits for both physical and mental health in university settings. This approach is consistent with recommendations from leading professional societies, such as the American Heart Association, which highlights the effectiveness of behavioral interventions focused on physical activity and sleep health for promoting well-being and risk reduction [
92]. Interventions targeting sleep hygiene and regular physical activity are recommended as first-line strategies, as students with better sleep quality and higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) show improved physical fitness and lower stress perception, regardless of BMI status.
Another important practical implication is that walking can be promoted as a simple, low-cost intervention. The finding that walking is a protective factor against depressive symptoms is consistent with a recent meta-analysis showing that even modest increases in daily step counts are associated with a reduction in depressive symptoms [
12]. This reinforces the idea that “something is better than nothing”. Medical schools can leverage this by encouraging students to integrate short walks into their routines, perhaps through “walk-and-talk” study groups or by promoting the use of stairs over elevators. These interventions are supported by evidence that structured walking programs can reduce depression and improve well-being in student populations [
93,
94]. This makes beneficial behavior accessible to all students, regardless of their fitness level or access to exercise facilities and aligns with World Health Organization recommendations for regular activity to improve health and reduce the risk of depression [
95].
Romanian medical education involves dense curricula and frequent high-stakes assessments, which may heighten psychological distress and shape coping behaviours. In this setting, a visible gym-oriented trend among some male students (bodybuilding/strength training) is time-intensive and may be difficult to reconcile with academic demands, whereas female students more often adopt lower-barrier activities such as walking. Campus features, a dispersed, multi-site teaching layout with constrained parking capacity—encourage active commuting between buildings, consistent with the comparatively high baseline walking observed. These contextual features help interpret the sex-specific patterns in our data while avoiding overgeneralization.
4.3. Strengths and Limitations
This investigation possesses several significant methodological and conceptual strengths. A key strength is its contribution to the underrepresented body of literature on the mental health of Romanian medical students, offering a unique regional perspective that expands upon findings from Western cohorts. The use of validated and widely accepted psychometric instruments, such as the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), ensures the reliability and comparability of our measurements across studies. Furthermore, our comprehensive modeling strategy, which integrated a broad spectrum of demographic, behavioral, and psychological variables, allowed for a more detailed understanding of their complex interrelationships. The formal sex-stratified analysis is a particularly robust feature of our design, as it uncovered distinct sex-specific associations between physical activity types and mental health outcomes, thereby challenging the utility of a uniform, aggregate approach to physical activity promotion.
Despite these strengths, the study is subject to several important limitations. The cross-sectional design fundamentally precludes any causal inferences; while we observed significant associations, the directionality of these relationships—for example, whether a lack of physical activity contributes to depression or vice versa—cannot be determined. The data, being self-reported, introduces the potential for recall and social desirability biases, which could compromise the accuracy of measurements for physical activity, sleep quality, and screen time. Additionally, our analytic sample size, while adequate for primary analyses, may have been underpowered to detect subtle or curvilinear effects, such as the BMI-mental health relationship, particularly within a population that exhibits a narrow BMI range. Finally, the study’s focus on a specific regional cohort limits the generalizability of our findings to medical students in other cultural or academic contexts, highlighting the need for replication in diverse populations.