You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

Published: 9 October 2025

Evaluation of Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness in the Diagnosis of Preperimetric and Early Perimetric Glaucoma

,
and
Department of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Aviation Medicine, 54/56 Krasińskiego Street, 01-755 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med.2025, 14(19), 7117;https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197117 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology

Abstract

Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the main diagnostic technology used to detect damage to the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in glaucoma. However, it remains unclear which OCT parameter demonstrates the best diagnostic performance for eyes with early, especially preperimetric glaucoma (PPG). We determined the diagnostic performance of ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) parameters using spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) in primary open-angle preperimetric and early perimetric glaucoma and compared them with optic nerve head (ONH) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) parameters. Methods: We analyzed 101 eyes: 36 normal eyes, 33 with PPG, and 32 with early perimetric glaucoma. All patients underwent Topcon SD–OCT imaging using the Optic Disc and Macular Vertical protocols. The diagnostic abilities of the GCIPL, rim area, vertical cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), and pRNFL were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: For PPG, the AUCs ranged from 0.60 to 0.63 (GCIPL), 0.82 to 0.86 (ONH), and 0.49 to 0.75 (pRNFL). For early perimetric glaucoma, the AUCs for GCIPL and pRNFL ranged from 0.81 to 0.88 and 0.57 to 0.91, respectively, whereas both ONH parameters demonstrated an AUC of 0.89. The GCIPL parameters were significantly lower than both ONH parameters in detecting preperimetric glaucoma (p < 0.05). For early perimetric glaucoma, comparisons between the AUCs of the best-performing mGCIPL parameters and those of the best-performing pRNFL and ONH parameters revealed no significant differences in their diagnostic abilities (p > 0.05). Conclusions: GCIPL parameters exhibited a diagnostic performance comparable to that of ONH and pRNFL parameters for early perimetric glaucoma. However, their ability to detect preperimetric glaucoma was significantly lower than the ONH parameters.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.