Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Improved Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections and Urinary Stone Disease
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. AI and the Detection of Bacterial Strains Involved in UTIs
No. | Author, Year, Country | AI Model | Results | Medical Importance of AI System |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Choi MH et al., 2024, South Korea [15]. |
|
|
|
2 | Clarke E et al., 2024, USA [16]. |
| XGBoost model had an average precision of 0.0031 | The feasibility of databases and ML to risk factors for infectious diseases, including invasive E. coli disease. |
3 | Nayak DSK et al., 2024, India [17]. |
|
|
|
4 | Iriya R et al., 2024, USA [18]. |
|
|
|
5 | Zhou T et al., 2024, USA [19]. |
|
|
|
6 | Wityk P et al., 2023, Poland [20]. |
|
|
|
7 | Cai T et al., 2023, Italy [21]. |
|
|
|
8 | Abu-Aqil G et al., 2022, Israel [22]. |
|
|
|
9 | Jeng SL et al., 2022, Taiwan [23]. |
|
|
|
10 | Dong F et al., 2022, China [24]. |
|
|
|
11 | Stracy M et al., 2022, Israel [25]. |
|
|
|
3. AI in the Analysis and Management of UTIs, Urolithiasis, and Stones
4. European Guidelines Regarding UTIs
5. American Guidelines Regarding UTIs
6. UTIs, Antimicrobial Resistance, Antimicrobial Stewardship, and Clinical Trials
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Healthcare-Associated Infections Acquired in Intensive Care Units—Annual Epidemiological Report for 2021. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/healthcare-associated-infections-acquired-intensive-care-units-annual-0 (accessed on 1 May 2025).
- Malmros, K.; Huttner, B.D.; McNulty, C.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Pulcini, C.; Tängdén, T.; ESGAP UTI Working Group. Comparison of Antibiotic Treatment Guidelines for Urinary Tract Infections in 15 European Countries: Results of an Online Survey. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2019, 54, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kohlenberg, A.; Svartström, O.; Apfalter, P.; Hartl, R.; Bogaerts, P.; Huang, T.-D.; Chudejova, K.; Malisova, L.; Eisfeld, J.; Sandfort, M.; et al. Emergence of Escherichia Coli ST131 Carrying Carbapenemase Genes, European Union/European Economic Area, August 2012 to May 2024. Euro Surveill. 2024, 29, 2400727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anton, G.-I.; Gheorghe, L.; Radu, V.-D.; Scripcariu, I.-S.; Vasilache, I.-A.; Carauleanu, A.; Condriuc, I.-S.; Socolov, R.; Onofrei, P.; Pruteanu, A.-I.; et al. Multidrug-Resistant Urinary Tract Infections in Pregnant Patients and Their Association with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes—A Retrospective Study. JCM 2024, 13, 6664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, L.A.; Oakden-Rayner, L.; Bird, A.; Zeng, M.; To, M.-S.; Mukherjee, S.; Palmer, L.J. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Predictive Models for Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lancet Digit. Health 2023, 5, e872–e881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Antimicrobial Resistance in the EU/EEA (EARS-Net)—Annual Epidemiological Report for 2022. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/surveillance-antimicrobial-resistance-europe-2022 (accessed on 4 June 2025).
- Ho, C.S.; Wong, C.T.H.; Aung, T.T.; Lakshminarayanan, R.; Mehta, J.S.; Rauz, S.; McNally, A.; Kintses, B.; Peacock, S.J.; de la Fuente-Nunez, C.; et al. Antimicrobial Resistance: A Concise Update. Lancet Microbe 2025, 6, 100947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tikhomirov, L.; Semmler, C.; McCradden, M.; Searston, R.; Ghassemi, M.; Oakden-Rayner, L. Medical Artificial Intelligence for Clinicians: The Lost Cognitive Perspective. Lancet Digit. Health 2024, 6, e589–e594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, D.; Hogan, J. We Need More Randomized Clinical Trials of AI. NEJM AI 2024, 1, AIe2400881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dippel, J.; Prenißl, N.; Hense, J.; Liznerski, P.; Winterhoff, T.; Schallenberg, S.; Kloft, M.; Buchstab, O.; Horst, D.; Alber, M.; et al. AI-Based Anomaly Detection for Clinical-Grade Histopathological Diagnostics. NEJM AI 2024, 1, AIoa2400468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porsdam Mann, S.; Cohen, I.G.; Minssen, T. The EU AI Act: Implications for U.S. Health Care. NEJM AI 2024, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilsen, M.P.; Conroy, S.P.; Schneeberger, C.; Platteel, T.N.; van Nieuwkoop, C.; Mody, L.; Caterino, J.M.; Geerlings, S.E.; Köves, B.; Wagenlehner, F.; et al. A Reference Standard for Urinary Tract Infection Research: A Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, e513–e521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radu, V.D.; Costache, R.C.; Onofrei, P.; Miron, A.; Bandac, C.-A.; Arseni, D.; Mironescu, M.; Miftode, R.-S.; Boiculese, L.V.; Miftode, I.-L. Urinary Tract Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae in a Urology Clinic—A Case-Control Study. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miftode, I.-L.; Vâță, A.; Miftode, R.-Ș.; Parângă, T.; Luca, M.C.; Manciuc, C.; Țimpău, A.S.; Radu, V.; Roșu, M.F.; Stămăteanu, L.O.; et al. The Impact of Urinary Catheterization on the Antibiotic Susceptibility of ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales: A Challenging Duo. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, M.H.; Kim, D.; Bae, H.G.; Kim, A.-R.; Lee, M.; Lee, K.; Lee, K.-R.; Jeong, S.H. Predictive Performance of Urinalysis for Urine Culture Results According to Causative Microorganisms: An Integrated Analysis with Artificial Intelligence. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2024, 62, e0117524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clarke, E.; Chehoud, C.; Khan, N.; Spiessens, B.; Poolman, J.; Geurtsen, J. Unbiased Identification of Risk Factors for Invasive Escherichia Coli Disease Using Machine Learning. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nayak, D.S.K.; Mahapatra, S.; Routray, S.P.; Sahoo, S.; Sahoo, S.K.; Fouda, M.M.; Singh, N.; Isenovic, E.R.; Saba, L.; Suri, J.S.; et al. aiGeneR 1.0: An Artificial Intelligence Technique for the Revelation of Informative and Antibiotic Resistant Genes in Escherichia Coli. Front. Biosci. 2024, 29, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iriya, R.; Braswell, B.; Mo, M.; Zhang, F.; Haydel, S.E.; Wang, S. Deep Learning-Based Culture-Free Bacteria Detection in Urine Using Large-Volume Microscopy. Biosensors 2024, 14, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Wan, X.; Huang, D.Z.; Li, Z.; Peng, Z.; Anandkumar, A.; Brady, J.F.; Sternberg, P.W.; Daraio, C. AI-Aided Geometric Design of Anti-Infection Catheters. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadj1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wityk, P.; Sokołowski, P.; Szczerska, M.; Cierpiak, K.; Krawczyk, B.; Markuszewski, M.J. Optical Method Supported by Machine Learning for Urinary Tract Infection Detection and Urosepsis Risk Assessment. J. Biophotonics 2023, 16, e202300095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, T.; Anceschi, U.; Prata, F.; Collini, L.; Brugnolli, A.; Migno, S.; Rizzo, M.; Liguori, G.; Gallelli, L.; Wagenlehner, F.M.E.; et al. Artificial Intelligence Can Guide Antibiotic Choice in Recurrent UTIs and Become an Important Aid to Improve Antimicrobial Stewardship. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Aqil, G.; Suleiman, M.; Sharaha, U.; Riesenberg, K.; Lapidot, I.; Huleihel, M.; Salman, A. Fast Identification and Susceptibility Determination of E. Coli Isolated Directly from Patients’ Urine Using Infrared-Spectroscopy and Machine Learning. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2023, 285, 121909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeng, S.-L.; Huang, Z.-J.; Yang, D.-C.; Teng, C.-H.; Wang, M.-C. Machine Learning to Predict the Development of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Related to Single Uropathogen, Escherichia Coli. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dong, F.; Yao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Guo, Y.; Jing, C.; Wu, J. Diagnostic Performance of Urine Analysis Based on Flow Microimaging and Artificial Intelligence Recognition Technology in Suspected Urinary Tract Infection Patients. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2022, 82, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stracy, M.; Snitser, O.; Yelin, I.; Amer, Y.; Parizade, M.; Katz, R.; Rimler, G.; Wolf, T.; Herzel, E.; Koren, G.; et al. Minimizing Treatment-Induced Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in Bacterial Infections. Science 2022, 375, 889–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Aqil, G.; Lapidot, I.; Salman, A.; Huleihel, M. Quick Detection of Proteus and Pseudomonas in Patients’ Urine and Assessing Their Antibiotic Susceptibility Using Infrared Spectroscopy and Machine Learning. Sensors 2023, 23, 8132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neha, F.; Bhati, D.; Shukla, D.K. Generative AI Models (2018–2024): Advancements and Applications in Kidney Care. BioMedInformatics 2025, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piotrowski, A.; Siegel, F. What can machines do? J. Urol. Urogynakol. 2021, 28, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campobasso, D.; Panizzi, M.; Bellini, V.; Ferretti, S.; Amparore, D.; Castellani, D.; Fiori, C.; Puliatti, S.; Pietropaolo, A.; Somani, B.K.; et al. Application of AI in Urolithiasis Risk of Infection: A Scoping Review. Minerva Urol. Nephrol. 2024, 76, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, X.; Liu, G.; Chi, Z.; Yang, T.; Zhang, Y. Predictive Model for Urosepsis in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Calculi Based on Ultrasonography and Urinalysis Using Artificial Intelligence Learning. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2023, 49, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senel, C.; Erkan, A.; Keten, T.; Aykanat, I.C.; Ozercan, A.Y.; Tatlici, K.; Basboga, S.; Saracli, S.; Guzel, O.; Tuncel, A. A New Scoring System to Predict Febrile Urinary Tract Infection after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Urolithiasis 2024, 53, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castellani, D.; De Stefano, V.; Brocca, C.; Mazzon, G.; Celia, A.; Bosio, A.; Gozzo, C.; Alessandria, E.; Cormio, L.; Ratnayake, R.; et al. The Infection Post Flexible UreteroreNoscopy (I-FUN) Predictive Model Based on Machine Learning: A New Clinical Tool to Assess the Risk of Sepsis Post Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Kidney Stone Disease. World J. Urol. 2024, 42, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.-J.; Lin, C.-H.; Chien, Y.-C. Predicting the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Based on Uric Acid Concentration in Stones Using Biosensors Integrated with a Deep Learning-Based ANN System. Talanta 2025, 283, 127077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Geraghty, R.M.; Thakur, A.; Howles, S.; Finch, W.; Fowler, S.; Rogers, A.; Sriprasad, S.; Smith, D.; Dickinson, A.; Gall, Z.; et al. Use of Temporally Validated Machine Learning Models to Predict Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Data from the British Association of Urological Surgeons Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Audit. Eur. Urol. Focus. 2024, 10, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moryousef, J.; Nadesan, P.; Uy, M.; Matti, D.; Guo, Y. Assessing the Efficacy and Clinical Utility of Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Urology. Urology 2025, 196, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nedbal, C.; Adithya, S.; Naik, N.; Gite, S.; Juliebø-Jones, P.; Somani, B.K. Can Machine Learning Correctly Predict Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy with Laser Lithotripsy for Kidney Stone Disease? Results from a Large Endourology University Centre. Eur. Urol. Open Sci. 2024, 64, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vigneswaran, G.; Teh, R.; Ripa, F.; Pietropaolo, A.; Modi, S.; Chauhan, J.; Somani, B.K. A Machine Learning Approach Using Stone Volume to Predict Stone-Free Status at Ureteroscopy. World J. Urol. 2024, 42, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, X.; Luo, D.; Mo, R. Application Value of Surgical Navigation System Based on Deep Learning and Mixed Reality for Guiding Puncture in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Study. BMC Urol. 2024, 24, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Yuan, H.; Guo, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Jiao, W. Deep Learning for the Study of Urinary Stone Composition from Computed Tomography Images. Arch. Esp. Urol. 2024, 77, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Cheong-Iao Pang, P.; Chen, C.; Zheng, Q.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.; Guo, J.; Mao, C.; He, Y. Automatic Kidney Stone Identification: An Adaptive Feature-Weighted LSTM Model Based on Urine and Blood Routine Analysis. Urolithiasis 2024, 52, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yenikekaluva, A.; Agrawal, M.S.; Ramanathan, J.M.; Azeez, S.F.; Sakegaonkar, A.; Shariff, A.M. Evaluating the Effectiveness of AI-Powered UrologiQ’s in Accurately Measuring Kidney Stone Volume in Urolithiasis Patients. Urolithiasis 2024, 52, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, R.; Liu, B.; Xu, H. CT-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting the Success of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Treating Ureteral Stones Larger than 1 Cm. Urolithiasis 2024, 52, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMahon, A.K.; Terry, R.S.; Ito, W.E.; Molina, W.R.; Whiles, B.B. Battle of the Bots: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Bing AI for Kidney Stone-Related Questions. World J. Urol. 2024, 42, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoodi, F.; Andishgar, A.; Mahmoudi, E.; Monsef, A.; Bazmi, S.; Tabrizi, R. Predicting Symptomatic Kidney Stones Using Machine Learning Algorithms: Insights from the Fasa Adults Cohort Study (FACS). BMC Res. Notes 2024, 17, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Zhang, X.; Yu, H.; Song, J.; Xu, T.; Li, M.; Liu, C.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Cui, Z.; et al. Efficient Urinary Stone Type Prediction: A Novel Approach Based on Self-Distillation. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 23718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elbedwehy, S.; Hassan, E.; Saber, A.; Elmonier, R. Integrating Neural Networks with Advanced Optimization Techniques for Accurate Kidney Disease Diagnosis. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 21740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shee, K.; Liu, A.W.; Chan, C.; Yang, H.; Sui, W.; Desai, M.; Ho, S.; Chi, T.; Stoller, M.L. A Novel Machine-Learning Algorithm to Predict Stone Recurrence with 24-Hour Urine Data. J. Endourol. 2024, 38, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nedbal, C.; Adithya, S.; Gite, S.; Naik, N.; Griffin, S.; Somani, B.K. A Machine Learning Predictive Model for Ureteroscopy Lasertripsy Outcomes in a Pediatric Population—Results from a Large Endourology Tertiary Center. J. Endourol. 2024, 38, 1044–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Kwak, C.W.; Uhmn, S.; Lee, J.; Yoo, S.; Cho, M.C.; Son, H.; Jeong, H.; Choo, M.S. A Novel Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence System for Interpreting Urolithiasis in Computed Tomography. Eur. Urol. Focus. 2024, 10, 1049–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sánchez, C.; Larenas, F.; Arroyave, J.S.; Connors, C.; Giménez, B.; Palese, M.A.; Fulla, J. Artificial Intelligence in Urology: Application of a Machine Learning Model to Predict the Risk of Urolithiasis in a General Population. J. Endourol. 2024, 38, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, J.; Liu, J.; Cheng, G.; Wang, H.; Quarrier, S.; Luo, J.; Jain, R. Development of UroSAM: A Machine Learning Model to Automatically Identify Kidney Stone Composition from Endoscopic Video. J. Endourol. 2024, 38, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noble, P.A.; Hamilton, B.D.; Gerber, G. Stone Decision Engine Accurately Predicts Stone Removal and Treatment Complications for Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Laser Ureterorenoscopy Patients. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0301812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chmiel, J.A.; Stuivenberg, G.A.; Wong, J.F.W.; Nott, L.; Burton, J.P.; Razvi, H.; Bjazevic, J. Predictive Modeling of Urinary Stone Composition Using Machine Learning and Clinical Data: Implications for Treatment Strategies and Pathophysiological Insights. J. Endourol. 2024, 38, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cumpanas, A.D.; Chantaduly, C.; Morgan, K.L.; Shao, W.; Gorgen, A.R.H.; Tran, C.M.; Wu, Y.X.; McCormac, A.; Tano, Z.E.; Patel, R.M.; et al. Efficient and Accurate Computed Tomography-Based Stone Volume Determination: Development of an Automated Artificial Intelligence Algorithm. J. Urol. 2024, 211, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panthier, F.; Crawford-Smith, H.; Alvarez, E.; Melchionna, A.; Velinova, D.; Mohamed, I.; Price, S.; Choong, S.; Arumuham, V.; Allen, S.; et al. Artificial Intelligence versus Human Touch: Can Artificial Intelligence Accurately Generate a Literature Review on Laser Technologies? World J. Urol. 2024, 42, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Şahin, M.F.; Topkaç, E.C.; Doğan, Ç.; Şeramet, S.; Özcan, R.; Akgül, M.; Yazıcı, C.M. Still Using Only ChatGPT? The Comparison of Five Different Artificial Intelligence Chatbots’ Answers to the Most Common Questions About Kidney Stones. J. Endourol. 2024, 38, 1172–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musheyev, D.; Pan, A.; Kabarriti, A.E.; Loeb, S.; Borin, J.F. Quality of Information About Kidney Stones from Artificial Intelligence Chatbots. J. Endourol. 2024, 38, 1056–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Touma, N.J.; Caterini, J.; Liblk, K. Is ChatGPT Ready for Primetime? Performance of Artificial Intelligence on a Simulated Canadian Urology Board Exam. Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 2024, 18, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altıntaş, E.; Ozkent, M.S.; Gül, M.; Batur, A.F.; Kaynar, M.; Kılıç, Ö.; Göktaş, S. Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Recommendations for Urolithiasis Management: A Study of EAU Guideline Compliance. Fr. J. Urol. 2024, 34, 102666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virgens, G.S.; Teodoro, J.A.; Iarussi, E.; Rodrigues, T.; Amaral, D.T. Enhancing and Advancements in Deep Learning for Melanoma Detection: A Comprehensive Review. Comput. Biol. Med. 2025, 194, 110533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peck, M.; Conway, H. Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Critical Care Ultrasound. Crit. Care Clin. 2025, 41, 593–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shifa, N.; Saleh, M.; Akbari, Y.; Al Maadeed, S. A Review of Explainable AI Techniques and Their Evaluation in Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening. Clin. Imaging 2025, 123, 110492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanslmeier, T.; Alsaiad, S.; Hueber, S.; Kurotschka, P.K.; Gerlach, R.; Gágyor, I.; Kaußner, Y. Prescription of Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infections in Outpatient Care in Bavaria: An Analysis of Routine Data. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0312620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kouri, T.T.; Hofmann, W.; Falbo, R.; Oyaert, M.; Schubert, S.; Gertsen, J.B.; Merens, A.; Pestel-Caron, M. Task and Finish Group for Urinalysis (TFG-U), European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) The EFLM European Urinalysis Guideline 2023. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2024, 62, 1653–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanolli, K.; Jost, M.L.; Clerc, O.; Genné, D.; John, G. Radiological Explorations of Patients with Upper or Febrile Urinary Tract Infection. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2024, 16, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging; Chandra, T.; Bajaj, M.; Iyer, R.S.; Chan, S.S.; Bardo, D.M.E.; Chen, J.; Cooper, M.L.; Kaplan, S.L.; Levin, T.L.; et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Urinary Tract Infection-Child: 2023 Update. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2024, 21, S326–S342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khoury, L.; Schnapp, Z.; Konopnicki, M. Improving Management: Novel Guidelines for Diagnosing Urinary Tract Infection in Infants. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2024, 43, 609–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gohil, S.K.; Septimus, E.; Kleinman, K.; Varma, N.; Avery, T.R.; Heim, L.; Rahm, R.; Cooper, W.S.; Cooper, M.; McLean, L.E.; et al. Stewardship Prompts to Improve Antibiotic Selection for Urinary Tract Infection: The INSPIRE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2024, 331, 2018–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- König, E.; Kriegl, L.; Pux, C.; Uhlmann, M.; Schippinger, W.; Avian, A.; Krause, R.; Zollner-Schwetz, I. Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program for Urinary Tract Infections in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Cluster-Controlled Intervention Study. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2024, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, D.S.C.; Wagenlehner, F.; Höller, M.; Abramov-Sommariva, D.; Steindl, H.; Naber, K.G. Phytotherapy (BNO 1045) of Acute Lower Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Women Normalizes Local Host Responses. Urol. Int. 2023, 107, 778–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartman, E.A.R.; van de Pol, A.C.; Heltveit-Olsen, S.R.; Lindbæk, M.; Høye, S.; Lithén, S.S.; Sundvall, P.-D.; Sundvall, S.; Arnljots, E.S.; Gunnarsson, R.; et al. Effect of a Multifaceted Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing for Suspected Urinary Tract Infections in Frail Older Adults (ImpresU): Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial in Four European Countries. BMJ 2023, 380, e072319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghlmandi, S.; Halbeisen, F.S.; Saccilotto, R.; Godet, P.; Signorell, A.; Sigrist, S.; Glinz, D.; Moffa, G.; Zeller, A.; Widmer, A.F.; et al. Effect of Antibiotic Prescription Audit and Feedback on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2023, 183, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McIsaac, W.; Kukan, S.; Huszti, E.; Szadkowski, L.; O’Neill, B.; Virani, S.; Ivers, N.; Lall, R.; Toor, N.; Shah, M.; et al. A Pragmatic Randomized Trial of a Primary Care Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention in Ontario, Canada. BMC Fam. Pract. 2021, 22, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nace, D.A.; Hanlon, J.T.; Crnich, C.J.; Drinka, P.J.; Schweon, S.J.; Anderson, G.; Perera, S. A Multifaceted Antimicrobial Stewardship Program for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Cystitis in Nursing Home Residents. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 944–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dyar, O.J.; Beović, B.; Pulcini, C.; Tacconelli, E.; Hulscher, M.; Cookson, B.; ESCMID Generic Competencies Working Group. ESCMID Generic Competencies in Antimicrobial Prescribing and Stewardship: Towards a European Consensus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organisation. Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions: A Practical Guide. Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289056267 (accessed on 4 June 2025).
- Werneburg, G.T.; Rhoads, D.D.; Milinovich, A.; McSweeney, S.; Knorr, J.; Mourany, L.; Zajichek, A.; Goldman, H.B.; Haber, G.-P.; Vasavada, S.P. External Validation of Predictive Models for Antibiotic Susceptibility of Urine Culture. BJU Int. 2025, 135, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
No. | Author, Year, Country | Aim of Study | AI Method Urolithiasis Results | Clinical Importance |
---|---|---|---|---|
PATIENT FOLLOW-UP | ||||
1. | Senel C et al., 2024, Turkey [31]. | This research team aimed to create a new scoring system and determine risk factors regarding febrile UTIs using machine learning methods for patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). | The study included 511 patients who underwent RIRS, 34 of whom developed febrile UTI. Hydronephrosis, a history of post-ureterorenoscopy UTI, and urine leukocyte count were identified as significant independent predictors of febrile UTI after RIRS. With at least one of these characteristics, 32 out of 34 patients (94.1%) who had a postoperative F-UTI were accurately predicted. | This novel scoring system formulated based on three factors, hydronephrosis, previous post-ureterorenoscopy UTI, and urine leukocyte count, can effectively differentiate patients at risk for the development of UTI following RIRS. |
2. | Castellani D et al., 2024, Italy [32]. | A machine learning model was developed to predict the risk of sepsis in patients who underwent RIRS. | Data from 1552 patients who underwent RIRS in 15 centers was processed using random forest, decision tree and gradient boosting algorithms. | The web-based interface of the predictive model was made available by the authors at https://emabal.pythonanywhere.com/. (accessed on 6 June 2025) It can predict post-RIRS sepsis with high accuracy and may be used for patient selection for day-surgery procedures and for identifying patients at higher risk of sepsis. |
3. | Chang YJ et al., 2025, Taiwan [33]. | This research introduces a biosensor for measuring uric acid concentration in calculi and a deep learning-based ANN system for assessing chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk. | The ANN system included age and creatinine values as inputs. A screen-printed electrode chip was used to measure uric acid concentration by cyclic voltammetry. The uric acid concentration in stones was measured using the biosensor, and the result was translated into serum uric acid concentration, facilitating the estimation of creatinine levels, which were subsequently utilized by the ANN to evaluate the risk of developing CKD. | This system can assist urologists in determining whether patients should seek consultation with nephrologists for early diagnosis and treatment. |
4. | Geraghty RM et al., 2024, UK [34]. | To build, optimize, and validate a machine learning model for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) outcomes using a national database. | Data from 12,810 patients in a prospective national database was used to build extreme gradient boosting, deep neural network, and logistic regression models for each outcome of interest (intensive care admission, postoperative infection, transfusion, adjuvant treatment, postoperative complications, visceral injury, and stone-free status at follow-up) in complete cases. | This machine learning study on PCNL provides a tool that could be used by surgeons to predict this procedure’s outcome and advise the patients about the risk of complications and the outcomes they can expect. |
5. | Moryousef J et al., 2024, Canada [35]. | To assess the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) scribing technology within the field of urology as a potential solution to streamline documentation processes and enhance clinical efficiency. | Standardized reference consultation notes for common urologic referrals, including urolithiasis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostate-specific antigen screening, were developed. Audio recordings of simulated patient interactions were presented to five publicly available AI scribes. The authors report that the AI system demonstrated high accuracy in transcribing conversations and capturing relevant clinical information. Of the evaluated AI technologies, Nabla achieved the highest efficacy, attaining a composite score of 68% and the lowest critical error composite score of 28%. | AI scribes can significantly lessen the administrative load of clinical recording, thus mitigating burnout, but as a complementary tool, with the clinician still being responsible for maintaining the quality of patient care. |
6. | Nedbal C et al., 2024, UK [36]. | To evaluate the effectiveness of ML in predicting outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for kidney stone disease, on the basis of preoperative characteristics. | Data from a large endourology center was used to develop and validate ML models for predicting clinical outcomes. The results indicate that the ML frameworks demonstrate high accuracy (93%) and precision (87%) in predicting stone-free status, as well as complications such as hydronephrosis and septic events associated with the stone removal procedure. The majority of complications were linked to a positive urine culture prior to surgery. | The final model was over 90% accurate in predicting complications and stone-free status post-surgery. These technological advances could assist urologists in overcoming the traditional limitations of ureteroscopy. |
7. | Vigneswaran G et l., 2024, UK [37]. | To create a model that predicts stone-free status after ureteroscopy by analyzing stone volume with additional clinical and radiographic parameters. | The ML model was trained to analyze the relationship between stone volume and the likelihood of achieving a stone-free status post-procedure. The accuracy and AUC of a fivefold cross-validated RUS-boosted tree model were 74.5% and 0.82, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 72.2%, respectively. | It is possible to anticipate which patients will be stone-free after ureteroscopy using machine learning. Total stone volume seems to be more significant than stone size as a predicting factor. |
8. | Meng X et al., 2024, China [38]. | To investigate the efficacy of a novel surgical navigation system that integrates DL and mixed-reality technologies in guiding puncture during PCNL for the minimally invasive removal of kidney stones. | The data of 136 patients with kidney stones was retrospectively analyzed. The study revealed that the use of the navigation system significantly improved the accuracy of the puncture site compared to traditional ultrasound guidance. | Real-time intraoperative navigation with acceptable accuracy and safety is made possible using a navigation system based on DL and mixed reality in PCNL for kidney stones removal. |
STONE ASSESSMENT | ||||
9. | Cao Y et al., 2024, China [39] | Devising a technique for differentiating pure uric acid kidney stones from non-uric acid stones by analyzing quantitative computed tomography (CT) parameters of single-energy slices of urinary stones in relation to chemical stone classifications. | The team proposed a deep learning framework that leverages convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automatically classify urinary stones based on their composition from CT images. The dataset included 918 non-enhanced thin-slice single-energy CT images of known chemical stone types, analyzed together with clinical data, and stone composition analysis results. The accuracy of the model was 97.01%, the sensitivity was 84.62%, and the specificity was 82.28%. | This deep learning model offers a rapid diagnostic technique for predicting the uric acid composition of kidney stones, using a CNN analysis of thin-slice single-energy CT images. |
10. | Zhu Q et al., 2024, China [40]. | To develop a DL model to detect kidney stones early using standard urine and blood test parameters. | Seventeen variables were evaluated and the four most significant characteristics based on the weight coefficient in this model were urine WBC, urine occult blood, qualitative urinary protein, and microcyte percentage. The model demonstrated substantial predictive value for kidney stones. The model achieved an accuracy of 89.5% and an AUC of 0.95. | Routine urine and blood tests can be analyzed using this model to accurately identify the presence of kidney stones, being of assistance to clinicians in the early detection of this condition. |
11. | Yenikekaluva A et al., India [41]. | To evaluate the UrologiQ AI system, designed to enhance the measurement of kidney stone volume in patients suffering from urolithiasis. | In comparison to radiologists, the AI demonstrated superior accuracy, efficiency, and consistency in quantifying kidney stone volume. The AI measured the volume of kidney stones with an average difference of 80% relative to the volumes determined by radiologists. | By providing reliable and objective measurements of kidney stone volume, the UrologiQ AI system outperforms radiologists’ manual calculations. By integrating AI with kidney stone detection and treatment, there is potential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making. |
12. | Song R et al., 2024, China [42]. | To create a deep learning model utilizing CT images to predict the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment for patients with ureteral stones above 1 cm in size. | A total of 333 patients who underwent ESWL were allocated into training and test groups. A deep learning model was created to predict ESWL outcomes based on CT calculi images. The model showed significantly better predictive performance in both the training and test groups compared to radiomics. | Analyzing CT scans with this deep learning model could predict the success of ESWL treatment with very good accuracy and could be used as an auxiliary tool in clinical urology. |
13. | McMahon AK et al., 2024, USA [43]. | To assess and compare the capacity of ChatGPT-4™ (Open AI®) and Bing AI™ (Microsoft®) in responding to inquiries related to kidney stone treatment, according to the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines, while evaluating aspects such as suitability, emphasis on consulting healthcare professionals, citations, and compliance with guidelines by each chatbot. | Based on the AUA Surgical Management of Stones guideline, 20 questions regarding kidney stone evaluation and treatment were formulated. These were addressed to the ChatGPT-4 and Bing AI chatbots, and their answers were compared using the brief DISCERN tool as well as response appropriateness. ChatGPT-4 surpassed Bing AI in questions 1–3, assessing clarity, accomplishment, and relevance of responses. Bing AI consistently included references, while ChatGPT-4 did not. | ChatGPT4 outperformed Bing AI in responses with a clear aim, an achieved aim, and in giving relevant and appropriate responses based on AUA surgical stone management guidelines, while Bing AI’s responses could be quality-checked, because it included references. |
14. | Mahmoodi F et al., 2024, Iran [44]. | To use machine learning in enhancing the identification of people at risk of developing clinically significant kidney stones. | The dataset included 10,128 individuals, for which 102 predictor variables from surveys and tests were analyzed. The presence of symptomatic kidney stones was the chosen outcome variable. Five ML algorithms were applied to examine kidney stone predictors, with performance comparisons made. Data balancing was performed using the synthetic minority over-sampling technique, and the accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC were evaluated for each algorithm. | The primary predictors for kidney stones included serum creatinine, sodium intake, hospitalization history, duration of sleep, and blood urea nitrogen levels. The tested ML models showed potential in evaluating the likelihood of developing systematic kidney stones and could recommend preventive lifestyle changes to reduce the risk. |
15. | Liu K et al., 2024, China [45]. | Based on CT scans, the authors aimed to create a non-invasive prediction method for identifying kidney stone types. | The authors developed a self-distillation model that uses DL to analyze medical images of urinary stones. By eliminating the need for external teacher models and avoiding the additional computational costs and performance degradation associated with model compression, this technique significantly improves the effectiveness of lightweight models, resulting in a classification accuracy of 74.96% on a private dataset. | These findings further support our model’s viability for clinical implementation, which could help medical practitioners create more accurate treatment strategies and lessen patient discomfort. |
16. | Elbedwehy S et al., 2024, Egypt [46]. | This paper presents a novel approach to diagnosing kidney diseases (stones, cysts and tumors) through the integration of traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs). | A hybrid model was created that combines the well-established AlexNet architecture (with robust feature extraction capabilities) with the more recent ConvNeXt framework (with sophisticated attention mechanisms). The dataset included 12,446 CT images that were analyzed by the AI system. The results demonstrate that this hybrid approach significantly enhances classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 99.85% in distinguishing between various kidney disease states. | These findings demonstrate how well the hybrid architecture and optimization approach diagnose renal disorders. |
17. | Shee K et al., 2024, USA [47]. | To create an effective predictive model that can analyze urine composition data collected over a 24 h period, and to identify patterns that correlate with the likelihood of kidney stone recurrence. | Data regarding 24-h urine samples from patients who had previously experienced kidney stones was analyzed. The results demonstrate a significant correlation between specific urine composition metrics—such as calcium, oxalate, and citrate levels—and the recurrence of stones. The validation set showed moderate discriminative ability in prediction accuracy (AUC = 0.64); repeat modeling with the four highest scoring features showed minimal loss in accuracy (AUC = 0.63). | Stone recurrences can be predicted with moderate accuracy by ML algorithms based on 24 h urine data. |
18. | Nedbal C et al., 2024, Italy [48]. | Developing an ML predictive model to analyze preoperative characteristics and predict the outcomes of ureteroscopy lasertripsy in a pediatric population. | Fifteen ML algorithms were used to find correlations between preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes (stone-free status after 3 months and the appearance of complications). Key predictors identified included factors such as stone size, location, and the presence of anatomical anomalies. | ML has great potential in pediatric urology to significantly aid surgeons in the management of kidney stones. |
19. | Kim J et al., 2024, South Korea [49]. | The study’s objective was to create an AI system that uses DL to detect urolithiasis in computed tomography (CT) images. This system would be able to calculate stone volume and density in real time, which is crucial for treatment decisions. The system’s performance in emergency scenarios was compared to that of urologists. | For the training of the AI system, 39,433 CT images were used, of which 9.1% were positive. The system’s peak positive-to-negative sample ratio was 1:2, and it had a 95% accuracy rate. Accuracy stayed at 95% in a validation set of 5736 photos, of which 482 were positive. | This AI system can assist in diagnosing urolithiasis with 94% accuracy in actual clinical situations, and even when using standard consumer-grade GPUs, the results could be produced quickly. |
20. | Sánchez C et al., 2024, Chile [50]. | To develop an ML model that can accurately predict the risk of developing kidney stones, based on patient demographics, medical history, and lifestyle factors. | A prediction model that identified people at risk of kidney stone formation was created, and it had high accuracy (88%). The model utilized different classifiers, such as logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and extra trees. | This AI-based tool can predict the risk of urinary lithiasis and help clinicians recommend preventive dietary and lifestyle measures. |
21. | Leng J et al., 2024, USA [51]. | Creating an automated system that can accurately classify kidney stones, based on their composition, using video captured during ureteroscopy. | A dataset of endoscopic videos that included various types of kidney stones was analyzed. The model was trained on labeled data, where the composition of each stone was previously identified by experienced clinicians. The UroSAM model was built to automatically identify kidney stones in the images and recognize the majority stone composition (calcium oxalate monohydrate, dihydrate, calcium phosphate, and uric acid). | This work shows how an ML model can accurately detect kidney stones from endoscopic video data. The model’s ability to classify the predominant stone composition could further be enhanced by providing high-quality video data for training. |
22. | Noble PA et al., 2024, USA [52]. | To develop a successful predictive model for stone removal and treatment complications in patients undergoing ESWL and laser ureterorenoscopy (URS). | The researchers utilized ANN models trained on a dataset comprising 15,126 ESWL and 2116 URS patient records. For URS, the average prediction accuracy was 89.0%, and for SWL stone removal and treatment complications, it was 95.0% and 84.8%, respectively. SWL and URS have AUC scores of 74.7% and 62.9%, respectively, and 77.2% and 78.9%, respectively. | The created models were integrated into a Stone Decision Engine web tool to help healthcare providers choose the best interventions based on patient data, and they demonstrated moderate to high accuracy in predicting outcomes for both therapy types. |
23. | Chmiel JA et al., 2024, Canada [53]. | To explore the application of machine learning techniques to predict the composition of urinary stones, given that stone composition is related to physiological parameters during its formation. | The primary objective was to develop predictive models that could accurately classify the composition of urinary stones, which commonly include calcium oxalate, uric acid, and calcium phosphate. The kappa score was utilized to evaluate model performance, and the impact of each predictor variable was analyzed. | The findings suggest that using machine learning for clinical data interpretation can predict urinary stones composition. By understanding the composition of urinary stones, clinicians can recommend targeted dietary modifications and pharmacological therapies that are more likely to be effective for individual patients. |
24. | Cumpanas AD et al., 2024, California [54]. | An innovative approach utilizing an automated AI algorithm designed for CT scans in order to streamline the process of stone volume determination. | The scalene, pro-late, and oblate ellipsoid formulas’ estimated volumes were then compared with the AI-calculated index stone volume and the ground truth volume. The authors emphasize that the conventional methods, which typically rely on linear measurements or the ellipsoid formula, can lead to significant inaccuracies. | The authors report that their AI algorithm significantly outperforms traditional methods, demonstrating a marked reduction in interobserver variability, providing accurate, precise, and time-efficient stone volume measurements. |
CHATBOT COMPARISON | ||||
25. | Panthier F et al., 2024, France [55]. | The study aimed to investigate the capacity of four large language models to write a systematic review on the subject of pulsed-Thulium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. | The four AI-generated reviews were compared to a human-written review. A list of ten “checkpoints” was defined by the first author and independently reviewed by the senior author. These checkpoints related to aspects of the laser’s technology and specific details of the results for lithotripsy. The blinded manuscripts were then submitted to nine participants with varying levels of expertise in urology, who evaluated the presence/absence of the checkpoints and made three subjective assessments: the overall quality and clarity of the manuscripts and an overall ranking from 1 to 5. | The human-written systematic review was objectively and subjectively more accurate than the AI-generated ones, with higher accuracy in highly technical topics. Among the evaluated reviews, the one produced by ChatGPT-4 had the highest scores regarding subjective and objective accuracy. |
26. | Şahin MF et al., 2024, Turkey [56]. | The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the quality and comprehensibility of the responses that were generated by five different AI chatbots: ChatGPT-4, Claude, Mistral, Google PaLM, and Grok, in response to the questions that were searched most frequently regarding kidney stones. | A distinct set of 25 frequently searched terms was given to each AI chatbot as input. DISCERN, the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials were used to evaluate the replies. | Of the five chatbots, Grok was the easiest to read and understand, whereas GPT-4 had the most complicated linguistic structure. Claude’s kidney stones text quality was the best. Chatbot technology has the potential to enhance and simplify healthcare content. |
27. | Musheyev D et al., 2024, USA [57]. | To assess the accuracy and reliability of health information about kidney stones disseminated by various AI chatbots. | Four AI chatbots (ChatGPT version 3.5, Perplexity, Chat Sonic, and Bing AI) were trained using the most popular kidney stone Internet queries from Google Trends and headers from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases website. The quality (DISCERN instrument, which ranges from 1 low to 5 high), understandability, and actionability (PEMAT, which ranges from 0% to 100%) of the chatbot outputs were evaluated using validated tools. | In general, AI chatbots did not propagate false information and offered high-quality consumer health information. However, the given information was beyond the recommended reading level for consumer health information. |
28. | Touma NJ et al., 2024, Canada [58]. | To evaluate Chat GPT-4’s performance on a multiple-choice test that simulates the Canadian Urology Board Exam. | On the MCQ exam, Chat GPT-4 had a score of 46%, with particularly low scores in oncology (35%) and trauma/reconstruction (17%), while the mean and median scores of urology residents who were graduating were 62.6% and 62.7%, respectively. | Chat GPT-4 had a low performance in the simulated exam. As these models develop and are trained on more urology content, ongoing evaluations of generative AI’s potential are required. |
29. | Altıntaş E et al., 2024, Turkey [59]. | To assess how effectively AI chatbots adhere to the EAU guidelines when providing recommendations for urolithiasis management. | Perplexity and Chat GPT-4.0’s average scores were 4.68 and 4.80, respectively, and both were considerably different from Bing and Bard’s results. | Chat GPT-4.0 and Perplexity were found to adhere well to EAU guideline recommendations. Updates to AI systems to maintain their accuracy and reliability are required to use them in improving urolithiasis patient outcomes. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pantilimonescu, T.F.; Damian, C.; Radu, V.D.; Hogea, M.; Costachescu, O.A.; Onofrei, P.; Toma, B.; Zelinschi, D.; Roca, I.C.; Ursu, R.G.; et al. Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Improved Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections and Urinary Stone Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 4942. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144942
Pantilimonescu TF, Damian C, Radu VD, Hogea M, Costachescu OA, Onofrei P, Toma B, Zelinschi D, Roca IC, Ursu RG, et al. Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Improved Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections and Urinary Stone Disease. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(14):4942. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144942
Chicago/Turabian StylePantilimonescu, Theodor Florin, Costin Damian, Viorel Dragos Radu, Maximilian Hogea, Oana Andreea Costachescu, Pavel Onofrei, Bogdan Toma, Denisa Zelinschi, Iulia Cristina Roca, Ramona Gabriela Ursu, and et al. 2025. "Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Improved Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections and Urinary Stone Disease" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 14: 4942. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144942
APA StylePantilimonescu, T. F., Damian, C., Radu, V. D., Hogea, M., Costachescu, O. A., Onofrei, P., Toma, B., Zelinschi, D., Roca, I. C., Ursu, R. G., Iancu, L. S., & Serban, I. L. (2025). Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Improved Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections and Urinary Stone Disease. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(14), 4942. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144942