Next Article in Journal
Combining Neuropsychological Assessment with Neuroimaging to Distinguish Early-Stage Alzheimer’s Disease from Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration in Non-Western Tonal Native Language-Speaking Individuals Living in Taiwan: A Case Series
Previous Article in Journal
Which Adverse Events and Which Drugs Are Implicated in Drug-Related Hospital Admissions? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Establishing a Prediction Model for the Efficacy of Platinum—Based Chemotherapy in NSCLC Based on a Two Cohorts GWAS Study

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1318; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041318
by Qi Xiao 1,2,3,4, Chenxue Mao 1,2,3,4, Ying Gao 5, Hanxue Huang 1,2,3,4, Bing Yu 1,2,3,4, Lulu Yu 1,2,3,4, Xi Li 1,2,3,4, Xiaoyuan Mao 1,2,3,4, Wei Zhang 1,2,3,4, Jiye Yin 1,2,3,4,* and Zhaoqian Liu 1,2,3,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1318; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041318
Submission received: 26 November 2022 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 3 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. Though it is a very interesting topic with potential implication of clinical factors, the results should be presented by histology type (at least squamus - non squamus) and disease stage, as the expected response to therapy differs significantly.

2. How were stages I-III included without any surgery or radiation therapy? This undertreatment as the patients did not receive the standard of care.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The work by Xiao et al entitled "Establishing a prediction model for the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC based on a two cohorts GWAS study" developed a predictive model for efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC. The study identified four SNPs and two clinical factors as important contributors and the implemented model achieved an AUC of 0.726.  

1) Need to clarify what features were used to calculate the PCA in figure 1B.

2) Table 3, showed the performance of model based on PRS is highest, then why authors selected and report final model with low accuracy.

3) The author must provide the codes and model on GitHub, so that scientific community get benefitted with it.

 

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for considering the suggestions of improvment. Nice work.

Author Response

Thanks very much for your suggestions on our manuscript. They are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our research. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction. We hope that our revisions will meet with your approval. 

Back to TopTop