Next Article in Journal
Serous Cystadenoma: A Review on Diagnosis and Management
Next Article in Special Issue
Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia: Clinicopathologic Features and New Perspectives on Anti-PF4 Antibody-Mediated Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress: The Role of Estrogen and Progesterone
Previous Article in Special Issue
Autoimmune Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/jcm12237305
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Long-Term Follow-Up Study in Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: What Are the Outcomes?

by
Maria Addolorata Bonifacio
1,
Daniele Roselli
1,
Claudia Pia Schifone
2,
Alessandra Ricco
2,
Angelantonio Vitucci
2,
Lara Aprile
3,
Maria Addolorata Mariggiò
1,* and
Prudenza Ranieri
4,*
1
Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari Aldo Moro Medical School, 70124 Bari, Italy
2
Unit of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico, 70124 Bari, Italy
3
Hematology Unit, Presidio Ospedaliero S.G. Moscati di Taranto, 74010 Taranto, Italy
4
Section of Experimental and Clinical Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7305; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237305
Submission received: 25 September 2023 / Revised: 5 November 2023 / Accepted: 23 November 2023 / Published: 25 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody-Mediated Thrombotic Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Endothelium damage triggers the multimeric protein von Willebrand factor (VWF) release and subsequent binding to platelets, which are recruited at sites of vascular injury. A complex and fragile equilibrium between circulating levels of von Willebrand factor and its metalloprotease, ADAMTS13, is responsible for the hemostatic balance. However, the presence of autoantibodies targeting ADAMTS13 results in an increase in von Willebrand factor, mainly in its ultra-large multimers. The latter lead to platelet aggregation, the formation of thrombi and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. This pathologic condition, known as immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), occurs with high morbidity and a high rate of relapses. In this work, the long-term follow-up of 40 patients with iTTP is reported. We assessed ADAMTS13 activity, plasmatic VWF levels and the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio, comparing iTTP relapsing patients with remitting ones. A decrease in the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio, along with a reduced ADAMTS13 activity, could serve as predictive and sensitive biomarkers of incoming relapses.

1. Introduction

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), also known as Moschowitz syndrome, is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by the pentad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, renal dysfunction, fluctuating neurologic impairment and fever [1]. However, all five symptoms occur in less than 10% of TTP cases, while severe thrombocytopenia (<30 × 109/L) and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia take place quite often during acute TTP events [2]. Sometimes, symptoms like mucocutaneous bleeding, asthenia and dyspnea may occur [3]. Therefore, TTP is a clinical emergency that requires timely diagnosis based on clinical and laboratory assessments [4]. A suspect TTP diagnosis on hemolytic patients could be driven by laboratory findings such as increased lactate dehydrogenase, reduced haptoglobin levels and presence of schistocytes in blood smear [5]. The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) has recently highlighted the relevance of ADAMTS13 testing in order to guide therapeutic choices and TTP management [6]. Indeed, the inactivity or severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 is the pivotal laboratory parameter enabling to distinguish TTP from other thrombotic microangiopathies, especially from hemolytic–uremic syndrome (HUS) [7].
Current therapeutic strategies, including corticosteroids, rituximab and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), allow for the control of acute events, but are very expensive and can be administered only in specialized centers [8]. In addition, the use of caplacizumab, a humanized nanobody against VWF, is still controversial as a frontline therapy, even though it has enabled a shortened time-to-response and has reduced the risk of refractory disease [9,10].
ADAMTS13 (A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 13) is mainly synthetized by interstitial hepatic stellate cells, but also by platelets, endothelial cells and renal podocytes [11]. This enzyme is responsible for the cleavage of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) [12,13]. Indeed, a strong reduction in ADAMTS13 enzymatic activity, with subsequent dysregulation of the VWF/ADAMTS13 axis, is the basis of TTP onset [14]. The same axis imbalance occurs during chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, as recently reported by Newnham and colleagues [15]. ADAMTS13 deficiency could be caused by acquired autoantibody-mediated functional inhibition (iTTP) [16] or by more than 200 inherited mutations within the ADAMTS13 locus, causing a congenital disease (cTTP) also known as Upshaw–Schulman syndrome [17,18]. A cTTP diagnosis must be confirmed by genetic analyses to identify ADAMTS13 mutations in homozygous or heterozygous states [19]. Conversely, the detection of autoantibodies against ADAMTS13 through an ELISA or a Bethesda assay provides evidence of iTTP [20]. The latter accounts for the 95% of all TTP diagnoses. Nevertheless, in both cases, the reduced proteolysis of VWF high molecular weight multimers triggers severe thrombotic events on activated or injured endothelium [21]. In addition, high plasmatic levels of VWF contribute to hemostatic imbalance and ultimately to thrombosis [22,23,24].
However, an increase in VWF only indicates an inflammatory acute phase response, thus it cannot be exploited as a specific biomarker of TTP [25]. Indeed, the increased production of high molecular weight VWF multimers is affected by blood group, pregnancy, aging and physical and emotional stress [26,27,28,29]. Furthermore, VWF levels may increase during infections, cancer and hypoxia [30,31,32]. However, an increased VWF is not enough to lead to TPP. Hence, iTTP could be triggered by several conditions, such as an abnormal immune response to viral infections, an autoimmune disorder, the onset of a malignant disease, a bone marrow transplant or the assumption of chemotherapeutic drugs [33]. In most iTTP cases, it is hard to find the triggering factor because of the wide spectrum of clinical presentations accompanying the acute events. Indeed, iTTP patients may experience fever, blurred vision, gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, neurological disorders, seizures, myalgia and bruises or purpura [34]. In this respect, severe bleeds due to thrombocytopenia are uncommon, although petechiae, epistaxis or mild-to-moderate cutaneous bleedings may occur [35]. Considering the high variability of symptoms and the severeness of this clinical condition, predictive models were developed (e.g., Bentley score, French score and PLASMIC score) to support emergency units to distinguish TTP from other thrombotic microangiopathies, as well as to quickly decide whether or not to perform TPE. These scoring systems were based on clinical signs (i.e., thrombocytopenia and renal dysfunction) and readily available laboratory tests [36]. Among them, the PLASMIC score is the most widely used model to predict a severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, developed by Bendapudi and coworkers [37]. Together with the careful assessment of clinical signs, the PLASMIC score is a powerful tool when testing ADAMTS13 [38]. It is based on seven parameters, i.e., platelet count (<30 × 109/L), creatinine level (<2 mg/dL), hemolysis signs (reticulocyte count > 2.5%, undetectable haptoglobin, indirect bilirubin > 2mg/dL), MCV (<90 fL), INR (<1.5) and associated conditions (i.e., absence of active cancer and no transplants received). Each parameter accounts for 1 point, enabling the clinician to stratify patients in high risk (6–7 score), intermediate risk (5 score) and low risk (0–4 score) of ADAMTS13 depletion. An intermediate risk score warrants a closer observation of the patient, while the high risk scores make patients suspected of TTP, enabling a start to their treatment [39]. Nevertheless, the detection of a severe ADAMTS13 activity, of less than 10%, is the laboratory finding that confirms current clinical diagnoses of TTP [40]. Indeed, iTTP arises from autoantibodies binding ADAMTS13, hindering its enzymatic activity or enhancing its clearance [41,42]. Nevertheless, in 15–22% of iTTP patients, ADAMTS13 functionality remains low, even though a platelet count normalization and a remission state is confirmed [43]. Given the high risk of fatal complications associated to iTTP, the close monitoring of these patients is required. Hence, a systematic assessment of ADAMTS13-related parameters is strongly needed in order to optimize relapse management [44].
In this respect, the evaluation of the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio has been reported for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and acute kidney injuries in COVID-19 patients [45,46] and for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients [47].
In this work, we report the follow-up of 40 patients affected by iTTP, from their first acute event to remission or relapse. Diagnostic laboratory parameters VWF, ADAMTS13 activity, ADAMTS13/VWF ratio and ADAMTS13 inhibitor have been assessed over time, studying their potential to be predictive biomarkers of iTTP relapse.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients Follow-Up

From 2014 to 2023, we followed-up with 40 patients with a first diagnosis of iTTP, who were admitted to the Hematology Units of the Hospitals in Bari and Taranto during routine clinical practice.
The diagnosis of iTTP was performed according to the current ISTH guidelines [6], calculating the PLASMIC score and assessing laboratory parameters (i.e., VWF, ADAMTS13 activity, ADAMTS13/VWF ratio and ADAMTS13 inhibitor). A 0 to 4 PLASMIC score has been considered as a low risk, while a 5 score has been considered as an intermediate risk and a 6 to 7 score has been considered as a high risk of ADAMTS13 severe deficiency. Since the PLASMIC score was introduced as a clinical prediction tool only in 2017, 11 patients were evaluated according to previous guidelines [48].
All patients with a high pre-test probability of TTP diagnosis, who were then confirmed with severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 activity, started TPE and/or corticosteroids, continuing until recovery of platelet count.
After the acute event, all patients were scheduled for monthly follow-ups for the first three months, then for routine check-ups every three months for the first year, then for check-ups every six or twelve months. A temporal variation of ±1 month was allowed for each time-point in the closest monitoring phases and ±2 months for the three-month, six-month or twelve-month monitoring phases.

2.2. Laboratory Methods

Blood samples were collected in citrated plasma tubes (BD Vacutainer®, Milan, Italy) before performing TPE. Samples were immediately processed and used within 24 h for laboratory panel testing to detect iTTP (VWF, ADAMTS13 activity and ADAMTS13 inhibitor).
ADAMTS13 activity was assessed using a chromogenic enzyme-like immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using GST-VWF-73 as substrate (Technozym® ADAMTS13 Activity, Technoclone Herstellung von Diagnostika und Arzneimitteln GmbH, Vienna, Austria), reading optical density at 450nm, as recommended by the manufacturer. Results were expressed as percentages (normal values range 0.4–1.3 IU/mL, limit of quantification 0.0071 IU/mL).
ADAMTS13 functional inhibitor activity was measured using a mixing test exploiting patient plasma as well as normal plasma in 1:1 ratio and incubating for 2 h at 37 °C. The residual enzyme activity is measured after incubation. Inhibition of 50% of normal plasma ADAMTS13 activity by undiluted patient plasma is defined as one Bethesda unit (BU). The presence of an ADAMTS13 inhibitor is reported when ≥0.5 BU/mL is detected.
The VWF antigen was measured with the latex immuno-turbidimetric method (von Willebrand Factor Antigen/HemosIL TM, Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy). Results were expressed as percentages (normal values range 60–150%, limit of quantification 2.2%).

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using R software, version 4.0.1. (R Development Core Team) Univariate analysis between the levels of ADAMTS13, ADAMTS13/VWF ratio and VWF of two different iTTP patient groups (relapsing vs. remitting) was performed through Spearman’s correlation test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
ROC curves were built to find the optimal cut-off to distinguish relapsing and remitting patients. Then, the cut-off was exploited to perform a Cox regression analysis and to calculate the hazard ratio.

3. Results

Figure 1a depicts the patients monitored in this follow-up study. More than half the patients had other comorbidities. Thus, over ten years, 4 patients passed away (10%) and 10 (25%) dropped out of the follow-up, mainly because of the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Within the remaining 26 patients still in follow-up, 13 patients responded to therapy and were in durable remission, while the remaining 13 were refractory and experienced a TTP relapse over a median time of 48 months (Figure 1b). One year before iTTP onset, four patients experienced a relapse. More than 2 years later, six patients experienced a second additional relapse.
Table 1 reports the characteristics of 26 patients with acute iTTP, followed-up with during this ten-year study. The patients’ median age was 49 years (range 29–59 years), while 9 were men (23%) and 31 women (77%). All of them were characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia (<30 × 109/L) and ADAMTS13 activity of less than 5%. The median level of VWF was 210 ± 45%, while ADAMTS13 inhibitor ranged from 1 to 105 BU/mL. In 55% of patients, we found low ADAMTS13 inhibitor titers (ranging from 1 to 5 BU/mL), while in 45% we observed high titers (ranging from 6 to 105 BU/mL). Four patients (15%) had the predisposing HLA-DRB1*11 polymorphism.
Initially, all patients were treated with conventional therapy, i.e., TPE and immunosuppressive drugs (steroids and/or rituximab) until platelet count recovery. Patients with severe symptoms, or those refractory to conventional therapy, were treated with caplacizumab [49]. Clinical remission was declared when a persistent recovery of platelet count (>150 × 109/L−1) was reported for 30 days after therapy interruption, as reported by Sukumar et al. [50]. Relapse was declared when, during a clinical remission, initial symptoms such as anemia or thrombocytopenia occurred, as well as in presence of abrupt or slowly progressive worsening of clinical status, or insidious alterations in laboratory values (i.e., ADAMTS13 activity < 10%) [51].
All relapses occurred with plasmatic ADAMTS13 inhibitor titers ranging from 1 to 13 BU/mL except for one patient, who showed an ADAMTS13 inhibitor titer of 116 BU/mL at the second relapse event. No statistically significant difference was found between ADAMTS13 inhibitor titers belonging to responders and to refractory patients (p > 0.05). Similarly, Figure 2a shows that VWF percentages did not differ in the two patient groups, being 123% (IQR 81) vs. 121.5% (IQR 42) in refractory and responder groups, respectively. On the other hand, the values of ADAMTS13 activity and the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio (Figure 2b,c) were statistically different between refractory and responder patients (p = 4.6 × 10−6 and 1.3 × 10−5, respectively). Indeed, ADAMTS13 activity was equal to 33.5% (IQR 30) in the refractory group, while it was 83.5% (IQR 16.5) in the responder group. As far as the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio is concerned, the refractory group had a 0.23 (IQR 0.24) median value, which was one-third of that relevant to the responder group, i.e., 0.67 (IQR 0.17).
Furthermore, the calculation of Spearman’s coefficients confirmed the correlation between refractory/responder states and ADAMTS13 activity values, as well as those of the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio (Table 2). No correlation was found for VWF and ADAMTS13 inhibitor.
Analyzing subsequent timepoints (T1–T4) in the refractory patients group, median values of VWF, ADAMTS13 and ADAMTS13/VWF ratio could be compared (Figure 3). The timepoints T1–T4 varied according to each patient’s individual history, but followed the experimental design reported in Section 2.1. It is worth noting that, immediately before relapses, the values of VWF, ADAMTS13 activity and the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio were 150%, 40% and 0.27, respectively (Figure 3, T4). Furthermore, the values of ADAMTS13 activity and the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio were significantly different at T4 as compared to T1, T2 and T3 (* p < 0.05).
Moreover, the values of ADAMTS13 activity and the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio, collected for responder and refractory patients, have been further studied in an attempt to identify potential cut-off values to distinguish the two patient groups. Although the patients number was low (n = 26), an ROC curve was built for ADAMTS13 activity and ADAMTS13 activity/VWF ratio. The optimal cut-off value for ADAMTS13 activity resulted in a value equal to 57% (AUC = 0.99), resulting in 100% sensitivity, 90% specificity and 94.4% accuracy. Concerning the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio, a cut-off of 0.48 (AUC = 1) was associated with 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 100% accuracy. Furthermore, considering the obtained 0.48 cut-off, the ADAMST13/VWF ratio was categorized to refractory/responder state and a Cox regression analysis was attempted, showing that the hazard ratio for relapse occurrence is 8.65 times higher in patients with an ADAMST13/VWF ratio < 0.48 (p = 4.0 × 10−6).

4. Discussion

This ten-year follow-up study on iTTP patients induced us to rethink this disease, considering it as a chronic condition [52]. The monthly monitoring of ADAMTS13 activity within the first three months after TTP onset allowed us to identify those patients with slow recovery rates, whose ADAMTS13 activity values stayed lower than 20%. These refractory patients were low-responders to conventional therapy, due to high titers of ADAMTS13 inhibitors. Thus, they were selected for rituximab treatment, achieving a stable platelet count and an effective suppression of autoimmune response. The collected data showed that circulating ADAMTS13 inhibitor levels ranged from 1 to 105BU/mL. Furthermore, levels higher than 5 units were not always associated with relapse (p = 0.68). These observations highlight the need to further investigate immune-mediated pathogenic mechanisms triggering TTP.
A strong association between HLA loci, the occurrence of autoantibodies and the onset of autoimmune diseases was already described by Amin and coworkers [53]. In this respect, the alleles HLA-DRB111 and/or HLA-DQB103 have been associated with a higher risk of TTP development, while the allele HLA-DRB104 appears to be protective. These alleles encode surface proteins that present ADAMTS13 to CD4+ T lymphocytes, thus driving tolerogenic mechanisms involved in iTTP [54]. In addition, infectious agents may trigger iTTP through activation of cross-reactive CD4+ T lymphocytes [55].
Beyond genetic and environmental triggers, aging may contribute in reducing ADAMST13 functionality, i.e., through the lack of Zn2+ ions, which are required for enzymatic activity, as well as for an effective antiviral immunity [56,57,58,59].
On the other hand, VWF plays a pivotal role in thromboinflammation, a complex network of processes involving endothelial damage, inflammatory cascade activation and cytokine release [60]. Immune cells and platelet activation drive thromboinflammation, causing microvascular thrombosis, hence a wide number of diseases [61]. VWF is responsible for the recruitment of platelets on injured endothelial surfaces, providing a plethora of adhesive binding sites. VWF is released from Weibel–Palade bodies (WPBs) by endothelial cells and platelet α-granules, in which it is stored in the form of high molecular weight multimers [32]. WPB exocytosis starts primary hemostasis and induces vasoconstriction [62,63,64]. A reduced ADAMST13 activity might not be able to cleave enough high molecular weight VWF multimers, paving the way to thrombosis. Therefore, the effectiveness of TPE and immunosuppressive therapies is based on the removal of VWF high molecular weight multimers, as well as of the autoantibodies targeting ADAMTS13 [65]. In addition, ADAMTS13 supplementation results in a good platelet recovery. Indeed, all patients in the acute phase were effectively treated with TPE and/or corticosteroids. Similarly, the treatment with rituximab led to platelet stabilization and to a dramatic drop in the ADAMTS13 inhibitor. Furthermore, patients treated with caplacizumab also achieved clinical remission.
These data, as well as the adopted strategies, emphasize the opportunity to target dysfunctional immune cascades to restore effective ADAMTS13 activity and reach clinical stabilization of the patients. The complex equilibrium between VWF and ADAMTS13 makes it compulsory to study both of them, since ADAMTS13 deficiency alone, or its bare functional inhibition, is not enough to explain TTP relapse and remission states [43]. Indeed, decreased ADAMTS13 activity (<5%) was substantially asymptomatic. Moreover, the patients herein studied showed physiological VWF levels (~143%), but they were continuously increasing (up to 198%) before relapse, causing a higher susceptibility to infections, autoimmunity or malignancy. No severe thrombocytopenia or significant clinical symptoms (i.e., stroke, comatose status, transient neurological alterations, seizures) were reported during pre-relapse phases.
Conversely, when the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio was <0.01 and a lower ADAMTS13 level matched with the reappearance of anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies, a reassessment of the patient’s clinical condition was required. In cases of relapses confirmed by severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, the exploitation of immunosuppressors (e.g., rituximab) in combination with caplacizumab resulted effective. Right before relapse (T4), our patients had a reduced ADAMTS13/VWF ratio (Figure 3c) as compared with the values obtained before. These data indicate the persistence of dysfunctional mechanisms, even without causing symptoms. Thus, since ADAMTS13 deficiency alone or the inhibitor titers are not enough to explain and predict acute events [66], the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio seems a more appropriate disease marker. Given the mild nature of relapses, as compared to the onset of TTP events, the need for sensitive, predictive biomarkers should drive a deeper exploration of ADAMTS13-related parameters, in particular right before acute relapses. Indeed, at this time, our patients showed platelet count and hematocrit parameters within the physiological ranges, thus clinicians had no suspicion of the incoming relapse. However, in our diagnostic routine, we assessed the ADAMST13/VWF ratio, considering it as a biomarker of chronic dysregulated endothelium, which is in agreement with literature data [47]. In this respect, scheduling check-ups at shorter intervals could be crucial for timely therapeutic intervention.
Our findings suggest that ADAMST13/VWF ratio is as effective as ADAMST13 activity in predicting TTP relapses, although a validation on a larger number of patients is required. Preventive immunosuppression may be used to achieve ADAMTS13 recovery, reducing the risk of clinical relapses in patients with an ADAMST13/VWF ratio < 0.48 [67,68].

5. Conclusions

In this study, a real-life follow-up of 40 patients with iTTP, spanning from 2014 to 2023, is described. The reported data emphasize the importance of promptly and reliably detecting refractory patients. Although VWF titers did not statistically differ between the two patients groups, their assessment indicates a silent proinflammatory state and a condition of endothelial activation that should be closely monitored by the clinician. Combining the information about VWF and its protease in the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio, an imbalance that persists beyond acute disease stages can be detected, providing valuable insights into this delicate hemostatic axis.
Collecting data on a higher number of patients over time, ADAMTS13 activity and the ADAMTS13/VWF ratio could become valuable biomarkers for iTTP risk stratification, early detection of relapses and prediction of therapy outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.P.S., A.R., A.V. and P.R.; methodology, investigation and formal analysis, C.P.S., A.R., A.V., L.A., M.A.B. and D.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.B. and P.R.; writing—review and editing, supervision, M.A.B., P.R. and M.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, considering its observational nature.

Informed Consent Statement

This research was carried out in agreement with Italian and institutional standards, as well as in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All data herein presented were collected during diagnostic routine at the University Hospital Policlinico, Bari.

Data Availability Statement

All reported data are herein available. Raw data are available from the corresponding authors, on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dimopoulos, K.; Tripodi, A.; Goetze, J.P. Laboratory investigation and diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2023, 60, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Joly, B.S.; Coppo, P.; Veyradier, A. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood 2017, 129, 2836–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kammoun, F.; Fakhfakh, Y.; Charfi, M.; Kassar, O.; Chaari, M.; Bouaoun, L.; Bahloul, M.; Frikha, I.; Kallel, F.; Ben Amor, I.; et al. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP): A Single-Center Experience. HemaSphere 2022, 6, 2174–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chiasakul, T.; Cuker, A. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of TTP: An integrated approach. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2018, 30, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Saha, M.; Mc Daniel, J.K.; Zheng, X.L. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and potential novel therapeutics. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 15, 1889–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zheng, X.L.; Vesely, S.K.; Cataland, S.R.; Coppo, P.; Geldziler, B.; Iorio, A.; Matsumoto, M.; Mustafa, R.A.; Pai, M.; Rock, G.; et al. ISTH guidelines for the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 2486–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mariotte, E.; Azoulay, E.; Galicier, L.; Rondeau, E.; Zouiti, F.; Boisseau, P.; Poullin, P.; de Maistre, E.; Provôt, F.; Delmas, Y.; et al. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of adulthood-onset thrombotic microangiopathy with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura): A cross-sectional analysis of the French national registry for thrombotic microangiopathy. Lancet Haetmatol. 2016, 3, e237–e245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Radhwi, O.; Badawi, M.A.; Almarzouki, A.; Al–Ayoubi, F.; ElGohary, G.; Asfina, K.N.; Basendwah, A.M.; Alhazmi, I.A.; Almahasnah, E.A.; AlBahrani, A.; et al. A Saudi multicenter experience on therapeutic plasma exchange for patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A call for national registry. J. Clin. Apher. 2023, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, J.; Yan, M.; Wen, R.; Li, J. Sequential treatment of rituximab and belimumab in thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura associated with systemic lupus erythematous: A respective case series and literature review. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2023, 26, 960–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Djulbegovic, M.; Tong, J.; Xu, A.; Yang, J.; Chen, Y.; Cuker, A.; Pishko, A.M. Adding caplacizumab to standard of care in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Adv. 2023, 7, 2132–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Uemura, M.; Tatsumi, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Fujimoto, M.; Matsuyama, T.; Ishikawa, M.; Iwamoto, T.; Mori, T.; Wanaka, A.; Fukui, H.; et al. Localization of ADAMTS13 to the stellate cells of human liver. Blood 2005, 106, 922–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Furlan, M.; Robles, R.; Lämmle, B. Partial purification and characterization of a protease from human plasma cleaving von Willebrand factor to fragments produced by in vivo proteolysis. Blood 1996, 87, 4223–4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Crawley, J.T.; de Groot, R.; Xiang, Y.; Luken, B.M.; Lane, D.A. Unraveling the scissile bond: How ADAMTS13 recognizes and cleaves von Willebrand factor. Blood 2011, 118, 3212–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Joseph, A.; Joly, B.S.; Picod, A.; Veyradier, A.; Coppo, P. The Specificities of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura at Extreme Ages: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Newnham, M.; South, K.; Bleda, M.; Auger, W.R.; Barberà, J.A.; Bogaard, H.; Bunclark, K.; Cannon, J.E.; Delcroix, M.; Hadinnapola, C.; et al. The ADAMTS13-VWF axis is dysregulated in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 53, 1801805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. González-López, T.J.; Provan, D.; Bárez, A.; Bernardo-Gutiérrez, A.; Bernat, S.; Martínez-Carballeira, D.; Jarque-Ramos, I.; Soto, I.; Jiménez-Bárcenas, R.; Fernández-Fuertes, F. Primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): Time for a rethink. Blood Rev. 2023, 61, 101112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Upshaw, J.D. Congenital deficiency of a factor in normal plasma that reverses microangiopathic hemolysis and thrombocytopenia. N. Eng. J. Med. 1978, 298, 1350–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schulman, I.; Pierce, M.; Lukens, A.; Currimbhoy, Z. Studies on thrombopoiesis. I. A factor in normal human plasma required for platelet production; chronic thrombocytopenia due to its deficiency. Blood 1960, 16, 943–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Levy, G.; Nichols, W.; Lian, E.; Foroud, T.; McClintick, J.N.; McGee, B.M.; Yang, A.Y.; Siemieniak, D.R.; Stark, K.R.; Gruppo, R.; et al. Mutations in a member of the ADAMTS gene family cause thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Nature 2001, 413, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sakai, K.; Matsumoto, M. Clinical Manifestations, Current and Future Therapy, and Long-Term Outcomes in Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lancellotti, S.; Sacco, M.; Tardugno, M.; Ferretti, A.; De Cristofaro, R. Immune and Hereditary Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Can ADAMTS13 Deficiency Alone Explain the Different Clinical Phenotypes? J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Denorme, F.; Vanhoorelbeke, K.; De Meyer, S.F. von Willebrand Factor and Platelet Glycoprotein Ib: A Thromboinflammatory Axis in Stroke. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Brill, A.; Fuchs, T.A.; Chauhan, A.K.; Yang, J.J.; De Meyer, S.F.; Kollnberger, M.; Wakefield, T.W.; Lammle, B.; Massberg, S.; Wagner, D.D. Von Willebrand factor-mediated platelet adhesion is critical for deep vein thrombosis in mouse models. Blood 2010, 117, 1400–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Edvardsen, M.S.; Hansen, E.S.; Ueland, T.; Aukrust, P.; Brækkan, S.K.; Morelli, V.M.; Hansen, J.B. Impact of the von Willebrand factor-ADAMTS-13 axis on the risk of future venous thromboembolism. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2023, 21, 1227–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kawecki, C.; Lenting, P.J.; Denis, C.V. von Willebrand factor and inflammation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 15, 1285–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Davies, J.A.; Hathaway, L.S.; Collins, P.W.; Bowen, D.J. von Willebrand factor: Demographics of plasma protein level in a large blood donor cohort from South Wales in the United Kingdom. Haemophilia 2012, 18, e79–e81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alavi, P.; Rathod, A.M.; Jahroudi, N. Age-associated increase in thrombogenicity and its correlation with von Willebrand factor. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wieland, I.; Wermes, C.; Welte, K.; Sykora, K.W. Two Examples of the Influence of Psychological Stress on the von Willebrand Factor Activity. In 37th Hemophilia Symposium Hamburg 2006; Scharrer, I., Schramm, W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 142–144. [Google Scholar]
  29. Malan, N.T.; von Känel, R.; Schutte, A.E.; Huisman, H.W.; Schutte, R.; Smith, W.; Mels, C.M.; Kruger, R.; Meiring, M.; van Rooyen, J.M.; et al. Testosterone and acute stress are associated with fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor in African men: The SABPA study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 4638–4642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khan, S.; Shafiei, M.S.; Longoria, C.; Schoggins, J.W.; Savani, R.C.; Zaki, H. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces inflammation via TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway. eLife 2021, 10, e68563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Patmore, S.; Dhami, S.P.S.; O’Sullivan, J.M. Von Willebrand factor and cancer; metastasis and coagulopathies. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 2444–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pinsky, D.J.; Naka, Y.; Liao, H.; Oz, M.C.; Wagner, D.D.; Mayadas, T.N.; Johnson, R.C.; Hynes, R.O.; Heath, M.; Lawson, C.A.; et al. Hypoxia-induced exocytosis of endothelial cell Weibel Palade bodies. A mechanism for rapid neuthophil recruitment after cardiac preservation. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 97, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gómez-Seguí, I.; Pascual Izquierdo, C.; Mingot Castellano, M.E.; De la Rubia Comos, J. An update on the pathogenesis and diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Expert. Rev. Hematol. 2023, 16, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, H.; Liu, J.Y. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with neurological impairment: A Review. Medicine 2022, 101, e31851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Blombery, P.; Scully, M. Management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Current perspectives. J. Blood Med. 2014, 11, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Coppo, P.; Schwarzinger, M.; Buffet, M.; Wynckel, A.; Clabault, K.; Presne, C.; Poullin, P.; Malot, S.; Vanhille, P.; Azoulay, E.; et al. French Reference Center for Thrombotic Microangiopathies. Predictive features of severe acquired ADAMTS13 deficiency in idiopathic thrombotic microangiopathies: The French TMA reference center experience. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bendapudi, P.K.; Hurwitz, S.; Fry, A.; Marques, M.B.; Waldo, S.W.; Li, A.; Sun, L.; Upadhyay, V.; Hamdan, A.; Brunner, A.M.; et al. Derivation and external validation of the PLASMIC score for rapid assessment of adults with thrombotic microangiopathies: A cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2017, 4, e157–e164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, A.; Khalighi, P.R.; Wu, Q.; Garcia, D.A. External validation of the PLASMIC score: A clinical prediction tool for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura diagnosis and treatment. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2018, 16, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kim, C.H.; Simmons, S.C.; Williams, L.A.; Staley, E.M.; Zheng, X.L.; Pham, H.P. ADAMTS13 test and/or PLASMIC clinical score in management of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A cost-effective analysis. Transfusion 2017, 57, 2609–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Staley, E.M.; Cao, W.; Pham, H.P.; Kim, C.H.; Kocher, N.K.; Zheng, L.; Gangaraju, R.; Lorenz, R.G.; Williams, L.A.; Marques, M.B.; et al. Clinical factors and biomarkers predict outcome in patients with immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Haematologica 2019, 104, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. George, J.N.; Nester, C.M. Syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 654–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rieger, M.; Mannucci, P.M.; Kremer Hovinga, J.A.; Herzog, A.; Gerstenbauer, G.; Konetschny, C.; Zimmermann, K.; Scharrer, I.; Peyvandi, F.; Galbusera, M.; et al. ADAMTS 13 autoantibodies in patients with thrombotic microangiopathies and other immunomediated disease. Blood 2005, 106, 1262–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sui, J.; Cao, W.; Halkidis, K.; Abdelgawwad, M.S.; Kocher, N.K.; Guillory, B.; Williams, L.A.; Gangaraju, R.; Marques, M.B.; Zheng, X.L. Longitudinal assessments of plasma ADAMTS13 biomarkers predict recurrence of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 4177–4186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sui, J.; Zheng, L.; Zheng, L. ADAMTS13 Biomarkers in Management of Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2023, 147, 974–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Joly, B.S.; Darmon, M.; Dekimpe, C.; Dupont, T.; Dumas, G.; Yvin, E.; Beranger, N.; Vanhoorelbeke, K.; Azoulay, E.; Veyradier, A. Imbalance of von Willebrand factor and ADAMTS13 axis is rather a biomarker of strong inflammation and endothelial damage than a cause of thrombotic process in critically ill COVID-19 patients. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2021, 19, 2193–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Henry, B.M.; Benoit, S.W.; Santos de Oliveira, M.H.; Lippi, G.; Favaloro, E.J.; Benoit, J.L. ADAMTS13 activity to von Willebrand factor antigen ratio predicts acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19: Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 induced secondary thrombotic microangiopathy. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2021, 43, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sacco, M.; Tardugno, M.; Lancellotti, S.; Ferretti, A.; Ponziani, F.R.; Riccardi, L.; Zocco, M.A.; De Magistris, A.; Santopaolo, F.; Pompili, M.; et al. ADAMTS-13/von Willebrand factor ratio: A prognostic biomarker for portal vein thrombosis in compensated cirrhosis. A prospective observational study. Dig. Liver Dis. 2022, 54, 1672–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Scully, M.; Hunt, B.J.; Benjamin, S.; Liesner, R.; Rose, P.; Peyvandi, F.; Cheung, B.; Machin, S.J. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and other thrombotic microangiopathies. Br. J. Haematol. 2012, 158, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cuker, A.; Cataland, S.R.; Coppo, P.; de la Rubia, J.; Friedman, K.D.; George, J.N.; Knoebl, P.N.; Kremer Hovinga, J.A.; Lämmle, B.; Matsumoto, M.; et al. Redefining outcomes in immune TTP: An international working group consensus report. Blood 2021, 137, 1855–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sukumar, S.; Lämmle, B.; Cataland, S.R. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Scully, M.; Cataland, S.; Coppo, P.; de la Rubia, J.; Friedman, K.D.; Kremer Hovinga, J.; Lämmle, B.; Matsumoto, M.; Pavenski, K.; Sadler, E.; et al. International Working Group for Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. Consensus on the standardization of terminology in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and related thrombotic microangiopathies. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 15, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Graça, N.A.G.; Joly, B.S.; Voorberg, J.; Vanhoorelbeke, K.; Béranger, N.; Veyradier, A.; Coppo, P. TTP: From empiricism for an enigmatic disease to targeted molecular therapies. Br. J. Haematol. 2022, 197, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Amin Asnafi, A.; Jalali, M.T.; Pezeshki, S.M.S.; Jaseb, K.; Saki, N. The Association Between Human Leukocyte Antigens and ITP, TTP and HIT. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 41, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Scully, M.; Brown, J.; Patel, R.; McDonald, V.; Brown, C.J.; Machin, S. Human leukocyte antigen association in idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Evidence for an immunogenetic link. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010, 8, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hrdinová, J.; D’Angelo, S.; Graça, N.A.; Ercig, B.; Vanhoorelbeke, K.; Veyradier, A.; Voorberg, J.; Coppo, P. Dissecting the pathophysiology of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Interplay between genes and environmental triggers. Haematologica 2021, 103, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pal, A.; Squitti, R.; Picozza, M.; Pawar, A.; Rongioletti, M.; Dutta, A.K.; Sahoo, S.; Goswami, K.; Sharma, P.; Prasad, R. Zinc and COVID-19: Basis of Current Clinical Trials. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 2882–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Anderson, P.J.; Kokame, K.; Sadler, J.E. Zinc and calcium ions cooperatively modulate ADAMTS13 activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Beattie, J.H.; Kwun, I.S. Is zinc deficiency a risk factor for atherosclerosis? Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 91, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Skalny, A.V.; Rink, L.; Ajsuvakova, O.P.; Aschner, M.; Gritsenko, V.A.; Alekseenko, S.I.; Svistunov, A.A.; Demetrios, A.; Aaseth, J.; Tsatsakis, A.; et al. Zinc and respiratory tract infection: Perspectives for COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 46, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sharma, S.; Tyagi, T.; Antoniak, S. Platelet in thrombo-inflammation: Unraveling new therapeutic targets. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1039843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jackson, S.P.; Darbousset, R.; Schoenwaelder, S.M. Thromboinflammation: Challenges of therapeutically targeting coagulation and other host defense mechanisms. Blood 2019, 133, 906–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Naß, J.; Terglane, J.; Gerke, V. Weibel Palade bodies: Unique secretory organelles of endothelial cells that control blood vessel homeostasis. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 813995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Subhan, M.; Dragunaite, B.; Scully, M.; De Groot, R. Calprotectin levels are elevated in congenital TTP and immune TTP at ADAMTS13 relapse. HemaSphere 2023, 7, e2092072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rondaij, M.G.; Bierings, R.; Kragt, A.; van Mourik, J.A.; Voorberg, J. Dynamics and plasticity of Weibel-Palade bodies in en-dothelial cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2006, 26, 1002–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kappers-Klunne, M.C.; van Asten, J.G.; van Vliet, H.H. ADAMTS-13 and Von Willebrand factor in relation to platelet re-sponse during plasma exchange in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A clue for disease mechanism? Ann. Hematol. 2009, 88, 1025–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Page, E.E.; Kremer Hovinga, J.A.; Terrell, D.R.; Vesely, S.K.; George, J.N. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and long-term outcomes from 1995 through 2015. Blood Adv. 2017, 6, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Westwood, J.P.; Webster, H.; McGuckin, S.; McDonald, V.; Machin, S.J.; Scully, M. Rituximab for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Benefit of early administration during acute episodes and use of prophylaxis to prevent relapse. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2013, 11, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Falter, T.; Herold, S.; Weyer-Elberich, V.; Scheiner, C.; Schmitt, V.; von Auer, C.; Messmer, X.; Wild, P.; Lackner, K.J.; Lämmle, B.; et al. Relapse Rate in Survivors of Acute Autoimmune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Treated with or without Rituximab. Thromb. Haemost. 2018, 118, 1743–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 12 07305 g001
Figure 1. Flow chart description of the patients monitored during the follow-up period (a). Relapse-free time for each of the 13 patients followed-up with in this study, identified by a number between 1 and 13 (b).
Figure 1. Flow chart description of the patients monitored during the follow-up period (a). Relapse-free time for each of the 13 patients followed-up with in this study, identified by a number between 1 and 13 (b).
Jcm 12 07305 g001
Jcm 12 07305 g002
Figure 2. Boxplots relevant to plasmatic levels of VWF (a), ADAMTS13 activity (b) and ADAMTS13/VWF ratio (c) in refractory and responder patient groups. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Boxplots relevant to plasmatic levels of VWF (a), ADAMTS13 activity (b) and ADAMTS13/VWF ratio (c) in refractory and responder patient groups. * p < 0.05.
Jcm 12 07305 g002
Jcm 12 07305 g003
Figure 3. Outcomes of the laboratory analyses performed at four subsequent timepoints (T1–T4) before relapse events in the 13 refractory patients group. WVF (a), ADAMTS13 activity (b) and ADAMTS13/VWF ratio (c). * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Outcomes of the laboratory analyses performed at four subsequent timepoints (T1–T4) before relapse events in the 13 refractory patients group. WVF (a), ADAMTS13 activity (b) and ADAMTS13/VWF ratio (c). * p < 0.05.
Jcm 12 07305 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of the tested patients (n = 26).
Table 1. Characteristics of the tested patients (n = 26).
ParameterCharacteristicsPercentage (%)
Median age (IQR)49 (29–59)
Gender (M:F)9:3123:77
PLASMIC Score 17 (n = 10)38
6 (n = 5)19
n.a. (n = 11)42
Thrombosis9/2635
Bleeding 17/2665
TherapySteroids (n = 10)38
TPE (n = 20)77
Caplacizumab (n = 5)19
Vincristine (n = 3)11
Rituximab (refractory) 2 (n = 5)19
Rituximab (effective) (n = 12)46
ComorbiditiesInfection (EBV, E. pylori, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae) (n = 4)15
Cancer (prostate, breast, medulloblastoma) (n = 3)11
Diabetes mellitus type II (n = 1)4
Angina pectoris (n = 1)4
Autoimmune disorders (n = 5)23
Other parametersFever (n = 3)11
Pregnancy (n = 1)4
Neurological symptoms (n = 13)50
Renal impairment (n = 3)11
HLA-DRB1*11 (n = 4)15
1 PLASMIC score: 0–4 low, 5 = intermediate, 6–7 high risk of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. 2 Rituximab refractory consists of the absence of an increase in platelet count (<50 × 109/L−1) associated with increased LDH, after five sessions of TPE. EBV: Epstein–Barr Virus. n.a.: not assigned.
Table 2. Univariate analysis performed through Spearman’s correlation test.
Table 2. Univariate analysis performed through Spearman’s correlation test.
Laboratory ParameterSpearman’s r Coefficientp-Value
ADAMTS130.841.3 × 10−5
ADAMTS13/VWF ratio0.864.6 × 10−6
VWF−0.130.61
ADAMTS13 inhibitor−0.110.68
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bonifacio, M.A.; Roselli, D.; Schifone, C.P.; Ricco, A.; Vitucci, A.; Aprile, L.; Mariggiò, M.A.; Ranieri, P. A Long-Term Follow-Up Study in Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: What Are the Outcomes? J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 7305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237305

AMA Style

Bonifacio MA, Roselli D, Schifone CP, Ricco A, Vitucci A, Aprile L, Mariggiò MA, Ranieri P. A Long-Term Follow-Up Study in Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: What Are the Outcomes? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(23):7305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bonifacio, Maria Addolorata, Daniele Roselli, Claudia Pia Schifone, Alessandra Ricco, Angelantonio Vitucci, Lara Aprile, Maria Addolorata Mariggiò, and Prudenza Ranieri. 2023. "A Long-Term Follow-Up Study in Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: What Are the Outcomes?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 23: 7305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237305

APA Style

Bonifacio, M. A., Roselli, D., Schifone, C. P., Ricco, A., Vitucci, A., Aprile, L., Mariggiò, M. A., & Ranieri, P. (2023). A Long-Term Follow-Up Study in Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: What Are the Outcomes? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(23), 7305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237305

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop