Next Article in Journal
Aging Combined with High Waist-to-Hip Ratio Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Modulation of Central Nociceptive Transmission by Manual Pressure Techniques in Patients with Migraine: An Observational Study
Previous Article in Journal
Gastrointestinal and Liver Complications in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus—A Review of the Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Clinical Management of Migraine

1
Regional Referral Headache Center, Neurology Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(17), 5225; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175225
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Accepted: 1 September 2022 / Published: 4 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Migraine)
Migraine is one of the most frequent neurological and vascular disorders, with an estimated global prevalence of 14.4% [1]. It is characterized by recurrent episodes of unilateral pulsating pain associated with an altered sensitivity to light, sound, smell and touch.
People often experience severe autonomic manifestations such as nausea and vomiting, and in about 20% of cases, aura, consisting of reversible visual, sensory-motor or speech disturbances, can precede or accompany headache [1]. Headache persists for hours or even for days, causing negative effects in many aspects of life and daily activities during and between attacks [1].
Several trigger factors may increase migraine frequency over time, and a gradual worsening supervenes in up to a third of patients, leading to chronic and/or more refractory phenotypes [2]. Comorbidities are additional conditions that may co-occur with migraine (i.e., anxiety and depression, sleep disorders, cardiovascular diseases) and result in poorer health outcomes, more complex clinical management and increased socio-economic costs [2].
Notably, the Global Burden of Diseases (2019), Injuries, and Risk Factors Study ranked migraine as the first leading cause of disability in the working population (15–49 years) worldwide, with women affected nearly three times more often than men [3,4]. Therefore, an effective clinical management of this illness requires a combined approach to eliminate irregular lifestyle and specific precipitating factors, to control acute attacks, to contrast a progressive transformation and to remediate bothersome or disabling associated symptoms [1,2,3,4].
In recent decades, there has been a conceptual shift in understanding the pathology of migraine, away from a purely vascular model to the recognition that neuroinflammation and altered brain connectivity may have a key role in its pathogenesis [5]. This has led to the development of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted drugs—the major neuropeptide connected to migraine—that are dramatically changing some people’s lives and potentially moving the paradigm of management from a “symptomatic” to a “disease-modifying” point of view [5,6].
Currently, three humanized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against CGRP (Fremanezumab and Galcanezumab) or its receptor (Erenumab) are prescribed in clinical practice according to local guidelines for the preventive treatment of high-frequency and chronic migraine, with confirmed high efficacy and ability to reverse progression [7,8,9].
Growing evidence of favorable quick and long-lasting action, requiring less frequent administration, has made these medications preferred options over the standards of care, in terms of tolerability and adherence [6]. Many experts now do not exclude the possible use of these mAbs as first-line therapy for many patients with early disease, before severe disability is evident [10]. Nevertheless, other novel effective therapies acting as an agonist of the 5-HT1F receptor (Ditans) or as a CGRP antagonist (Gepants) are ready to emerge on the market for a better management of migraine crisis and/or its prevention, with expected good safety and tolerability profiles [11,12].
However, unsatisfactory and/or late response to anti-CGRP mAbs may occur in some migraine sufferers [13]. Add-on strategies such as neuromodulation, nerve blocks infiltrations and/or surgical decompression are available for treating more drug-resistant patients who show no improvement after medication intake [14].
Since CGRP is a potent vasodilator widely involved in many physiological and pathophysiological human processes [15], an important question is how long migraineurs can take these medications without experiencing any possible cardiovascular or other severe complications [16]. Moreover, another caveat to keep in mind is the administration of these drugs in potential “frail” categories, such as women who wish to become pregnant and patients with pre-existing major ischemic events and/or with ongoing immunomodulatory therapies [16,17]. In these scenarios, it may be also useful to consider alternative nonpharmacological modalities such as acupuncture, nutraceuticals, diet, relaxation or physical training and biofeedback in order to provide pain relief [18].
In conclusion, migraine is a global problem, and its prevalence is on the rise.
Although migraine disability and comorbidities usually guide the specialist to prefer one medication over another, a therapeutic failure may have psychologically detrimental effects. Given the heterogeneity conditions, the choice remains an individual alongside clinical guidance to consider benefits versus risks. Hence, the development of biomarkers able to predict the drug efficacy before its assumption is paramount for migraine management, decision making and personalized treatment success.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lipton, R.B.; Bigal, M.E. Migraine: Epidemiology, impact, and risk factor for progression. Headache 2005, 45, S3–S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sacco, S.; Braschinsky, M.; Ducros, A.; Lampl, C.; Little, P.; van den Brink, A.M.; Pozo-Rosich, P.; Reuter, U.; de la Torre, E.R.; Del Rio, M.S.; et al. European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine: Developed with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance (EMHA). J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1204–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Steiner, T.J.; Stovner, L.J.; Jensen, R.; Uluduz, D.; Katsarava, Z. Migraine remains second among the world causes of disability, and first among young women: Findings from GBD2019. J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Charles, A. The pathophysiology of migraine: Implications for clinical management. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Mallick-Searle, T.; Moriarty, M. Unmet needs in the acute treatment of migraine attacks and the emerging role of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists: An integrative review. J. Am. Assoc. Nurse Pract. 2020, 33, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Albanese, M.; Mercuri, N.B. Could the New Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies Be Effective in Migraine Aura? Case Reports and Literature Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Barbanti, P.; Egeo, G.; Aurilia, C.; d’Onofrio, F.; Albanese, M.; Cetta, I.; Di Fiore, P.; Zucco, M.; Filippi, M.; FRIEND-Study Group; et al. Fremanezumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine: A 12-week, multicenter, real-life, cohort study (the FRIEND study). J. Headache Pain 2022, 23, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Altamura, C.; Brunelli, N.; Marcosano, M.; Aurilia, C.; Egeo, G.; Lovati, C.; Favoni, V.; Perrotta, A.; Maestrini, I.; Di Cola, F.S.; et al. Conversion from chronic to episodic migraine in patients treated with galcanezumab in real life in Italy: The 12-month observational, longitudinal, cohort multicenter GARLIT experience. J. Neurol. 2022, 28, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sacco, S.; Amin, F.M.; Ashina, M.; Bendtsen, L.; Deligianni, C.I.; Gil-Gouvein, R. European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention—2022 update. J. Headache Pain 2022, 23, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Viticchi, G.; Falsetti, L.; Silvestrini, M.; Bartolini, M. Ditans: A new prospective for the therapy of migraine attack? Neurol. Sci. 2022, 43, 5709–5716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Altamura, C.; Brunelli, N.; Marcosano, M.; Fofi, L.; Vernieri, F. Gepants—A long way to cure: A narrative review. Neurol. Sci. 2022, 43, 5697–5708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Altamura, C.; Cevoli, S.; Brunelli, N.; Aurilia, C.; Fofi, L.; Egeo, L.; Barbanti, P.; Vernieri, F. GARLIT Study Group collaborators. When should we consider chronic patients as non-responders to monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway? J. Neurol. 2022, 269, 1032–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ambrosini, A.; Schoenen, J. Invasive pericranial nerve interventions. Cephalalgia 2016, 36, 1156–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, J.Y.; Granstein, R.D. Roles of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the skin, and other physiological and pathophysiological functions. Brain Behav. Immun. Health 2021, 18, 100361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Favoni, V.; Giani, L.; Al-Hassany, L.; Asioli, G.M.; Butera, C.; de Boer, I.; Guglielmetti, M.; Koniari, C.; Mavridis, T.; European Headache Federation School of Advanced Studies (EHF-SAS); et al. CGRP and migraine from a cardiovascular point of view: What do we expect from blocking CGRP? J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ray, J.C.; Allen, P.; Bacsi, A.; Bosco, J.J.; Chen, L.; Eller, M.; Kua, H.; Lim, L.L.; Matharu, M.S.; Monif, M.; et al. Inflammatory complications of CGRP monoclonal antibodies: A case series. J. Headache Pain 2021, 22, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Coppola, G.; Di Lorenzo, C.; Serrao, M.; Parisi, V.; Schoenen, J.; Pierelli, F. Pathophysiological targets for non-pharmacological treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 2016, 36, 1103–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Albanese, M. Clinical Management of Migraine. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175225

AMA Style

Albanese M. Clinical Management of Migraine. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(17):5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175225

Chicago/Turabian Style

Albanese, Maria. 2022. "Clinical Management of Migraine" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 17: 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175225

APA Style

Albanese, M. (2022). Clinical Management of Migraine. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(17), 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175225

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop