Next Article in Journal
Factors Associated with 90-Day Mortality in Invasively Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 in Marseille, France
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Preterm Births, Low Birthweights and Stillbirths: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Prophylactic Peritoneal Fenestration during Kidney Transplantation Can Reduce the Type C Lymphocele Formation

J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(23), 5651; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235651
by Mohammad Golriz 1, Mohammadsadegh Sabagh 1, Golnaz Emami 1, Sara Mohammadi 1, Ali Ramouz 1, Elias Khajeh 1, Omid Ghamarnejad 1, Christian Morath 2, Markus Mieth 1, Yakup Kulu 1, Martin Zeier 2 and Arianeb Mehrabi 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(23), 5651; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235651
Submission received: 24 October 2021 / Revised: 22 November 2021 / Accepted: 29 November 2021 / Published: 30 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article is well written and interesting. The author did a retrospective evaluation of a well known approach to prevent lyphocele after kt. 

I would suggest only to discuss about the role of the new technological devices for tissue dissection in preventing lymphocele.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. the 2001-2007 cohort is old and there have been significant changes in transplant practice after that.
  2. what is PKTL grading? need to explain in method and also give abbreviation in the table.
  3. Table 2, the author should give all factors data in univariate and multivariate, not only the 5 factors
  4. In my opinion, the implications of the study are underdeveloped and must be improved and explained further in the final discussion.
  5. Words in the title are not usually in the keywords. In addition, the keywords are often written in alphabetical order.

  6. The authors must check the use of all acronyms, abbreviations, and notations employed in the whole manuscript.

  7. The manuscript needs to be proofread by the authors.

  8. The novelty and contribution of this study must be clearly stated.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors welcomed all suggestions and observations comprised in the first revision of the paper.
Back to TopTop