Next Article in Journal
First-Line Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for ALK-Positive Lung Cancer in Asian Populations: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Treatment of Macular Edema in Vascular Retinal Diseases: A 2021 Update
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Deaf Children Using Two Standardised Assessment Instruments: The ADIR-Deaf Adaptation and the ADOS-2 Deaf Adaptation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Update on the Management of Uveitic Macular Edema
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review

J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(19), 4375; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194375
by Michał Orski 1,* and Maciej Gawęcki 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(19), 4375; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194375
Submission received: 9 August 2021 / Revised: 9 September 2021 / Accepted: 18 September 2021 / Published: 25 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Macular Edema: The Current Recommendations for Clinical Practice)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript is overall comprehensive and informative providing useful information on IGS. Also, the text is well organized and well written, with logical formatting with appropriate length. Only minor revision is needed.

  1. Introduction: Both paragraphs 2 and 4 describe IGS's diagnosis. It would be logical to explain together in one section rather than in two paragraphs.
  2. Result: 8page, table4, the description of the IVT abbreviation is missing.
  3. Result: The size of all tables should be adjusted.
  4. Discussion: 15page, 6th paragraphs, typo of currentn

Author Response

Remarks

  1. Introduction: Both paragraphs 2 and 4 describe IGS's diagnosis. It would be logical to explain together in one section rather than in two paragraphs.
  2. Result: 8page, table4, the description of the IVT abbreviation is missing.
  3. Result: The size of all tables should be adjusted.
  4. Discussion: 15page, 6th paragraphs, typo of currentn

Response

1. We changed that according to reviewer’s suggestion, thank you. 

2. IVT description supplied

3. It will be adjusted by the editor , thanks for that suggestion

4. Corrected 

Reviewer 2 Report

see and give a more precise explanation the highlighted text

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for your effort to revise this manuscript and for specific remarks.

We corrected typo errors and supplied missing information (timing of application of different forms of treatment in IGS) according to reviewer’s remarks. 

Back to TopTop