Next Article in Journal
The Role of the Clathrin Adaptor AP-1: Polarized Sorting and Beyond
Next Article in Special Issue
Theoretical and Computational Studies of Peptides and Receptors of the Insulin Family
Previous Article in Journal
Membrane Bioprocesses for Pharmaceutical Micropollutant Removal from Waters
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 4
Issue 4
10.3390/membranes4040730
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Flexibility in the Insulin Receptor Ectodomain Enables Docking of Insulin in Crystallographic Conformation Observed in a Hormone-Bound Microreceptor

by
Harish Vashisth
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, 33 Academic Way, Durham,NH 03824, USA
Membranes 2014, 4(4), 730-746; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes4040730
Submission received: 18 August 2014 / Revised: 18 September 2014 / Accepted: 5 October 2014 / Published: 10 October 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structure and Function of Membrane Receptors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Insulin binding to the insulin receptor (IR) is the first key step in initiating downstream signaling cascades for glucose homeostasis in higher organisms. The molecular details of insulin recognition by IR are not yet completely understood, but a picture of hormone/receptor interactions at one of the epitopes (Site 1) is beginning to emerge from recent structural evidence. However, insulin-bound structures of truncated IR suggest that crystallographic conformation of insulin cannot be accommodated in the full IR ectodomain due to steric overlap of insulin with the first two type III fibronectin domains (F1 and F2), which are contributed to the insulin binding-pocket by the second subunit in the IR homodimer. A conformational change in the F1-F2 pair has thus been suggested. In this work, we present an all-atom structural model of complex of insulin and the IR ectodomain, where no structural overlap of insulin with the receptor domains (F1 and F2) is observed. This structural model was arrived at by flexibly fitting parts of our earlier insulin/IR all-atom model into the simulated density maps of crystallized constructs combined with conformational sampling from apo-IR solution conformations. Importantly, our experimentally-consistent model helps rationalize yet unresolved Site 2 contacts of hormone with IR, and suggests ligand cross-linking of receptor subunits.

1. Introduction

Insulin is a therapeutically significant protein hormone secreted by the pancreatic β cells [1] that binds to the extracellular domains of the insulin receptor (IR) and activates the intracellular kinase domains. Mature forms of hormone and the receptor are comprised of two polypeptide chains: (a) the A- and B-chain (totaling 51 residues) in insulin; and (b) the α- and β-chains (totaling over 1300 residues) in IR [2,3,4,5]. Structurally, both chains of insulin are linked by two interchain disulfide bonds and have three α-helices (Figure 1a) with some flexible residues in the N- and C-termini of B-chain (B1-B8 and B21-B30) [6], while IR ectodomain has a homodimeric ∧-shaped topology [7,8] where each subunit is comprised of a leucine-cysteine-leucine-rich (L1-CR-L2) motif [9] followed by three fibronectin repeats (F1-F2-F3) (Figure 1b) that in the holo-receptor are connected to an intracellular kinase domain via a single transmembrane helix [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. The homologous type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) [20] shares similar topology [21].
Membranes 04 00730 g001 1024
Figure 1. Three-dimensional folds of insulin and the IR ectodomain. (a) Helices in individual chains of hormone (PDB code 4INS) are rendered as yellow (A-chain) and black (B-chain) cartoons, while the flexible N- and C-termini of B-chain are transparent cartoons. (b) IR ectodomain homodimer (PDB code 3LOH) is shown with domains of one subunit as ribbons, while identical domains of the other subunit as space-filling. Individual domains are uniquely colored and labeled (αCT stands for the helical C-terminal segment of each α-chain of IR). Two interchain disulfide bonds in insulin and one in the receptor are shown in green sticks. In all panels, only backbone atoms are rendered for clarity.
Figure 1. Three-dimensional folds of insulin and the IR ectodomain. (a) Helices in individual chains of hormone (PDB code 4INS) are rendered as yellow (A-chain) and black (B-chain) cartoons, while the flexible N- and C-termini of B-chain are transparent cartoons. (b) IR ectodomain homodimer (PDB code 3LOH) is shown with domains of one subunit as ribbons, while identical domains of the other subunit as space-filling. Individual domains are uniquely colored and labeled (αCT stands for the helical C-terminal segment of each α-chain of IR). Two interchain disulfide bonds in insulin and one in the receptor are shown in green sticks. In all panels, only backbone atoms are rendered for clarity.
Membranes 04 00730 g001
A number of studies [3,4,5,12,15,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46] have suggested that insulin and IR each has two complementary binding epitopes known as “Site 1” and “Site 2” (Figure 2a): (a) both chains of insulin contribute residues to Site 1 (GlyA1, IleA2, ValA3, GlnA5, ThrA8, TyrA19, AsnA21, ValB12, TyrB16, PheB24, PheB25, and TyrB26) and Site 2 (SerA12, LeuA13, GluA17, HisB10, GluB13, LeuB17, and ValB18); and (b) in the receptor, L1 domain residues (Asp12, Ile13, Arg14, Asn15, Gln34, Leu36, Leu37, Phe39, Glu44, Phe64, Tyr67, Phe89, Asn90, and Tyr91) and the α-chain C-terminus (αCT) residues (Phe705, Glu706, Asp707, Tyr708, Leu709, Asn711, Val712, Phe714, Pro716, and Arg717) contribute to Site 1, while residues in loops of the F1 domain (Lys484, Leu552, and Asp591) and the F2 domain (Ile602, Lys616, Asp620, and Pro621) likely contribute to Site 2. Moreover, productive engagement of insulin and IR (via Site 1 and Site 2) is a result of further conformational rearrangements in each due to plasticity in their structures. Particularly, the flexible C-terminus of the B-chain of insulin has been suggested to detach from rest of the insulin structure to expose its hydrophobic core to IR [47,48,49,50], which is potentially coupled with movement of the αCT peptide on IR [8,36,37,38,39,40,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,40,51]. These earlier observations are now strongly supported by recent (crystallographic) structural evidence on hormone-bound receptor fragments [58,59]. Importantly, alignment (based upon the L1 domain) of the apo-ectodomain structure (PDB code 3LOH) with a hormone-bound receptor structure (PDB code 3W11) unambiguously reveals the displacement of αCT (Figure 2b), and implies the detachment of the flexible C-terminus of insulin B-chain because αCT (in hormone-bound structure) occupies the position of this structural motif in free hormone (Figure 2c). Furthermore, we note that the exact displaced position of the C-terminus of the B-chain has now been resolved in latest structures by Menting et al. [59].
Membranes 04 00730 g002 1024
Figure 2. Insulin/IR binding interfaces. (a) Patches of residues that form Site 1 (magenta) and Site 2 (dark blue) on hormone and the receptor are shown as space-filling. (b and c) Overlay of L1/αCT conformations in apo-ectodomain (brighter ribbons) and insulin-bound receptor fragment (darker tubes). Both chains of insulin are also rendered (yellow and black tubes). The displacement of αCT is indicated by a red arrow. Panel c in addition shows the steric overlap of the C-terminus of insulin B-chain (cyan tube) in free hormone with αCT position in the hormone-bound structure. The chain/domain coloring and labeling scheme is same as in Figure 1.
Figure 2. Insulin/IR binding interfaces. (a) Patches of residues that form Site 1 (magenta) and Site 2 (dark blue) on hormone and the receptor are shown as space-filling. (b and c) Overlay of L1/αCT conformations in apo-ectodomain (brighter ribbons) and insulin-bound receptor fragment (darker tubes). Both chains of insulin are also rendered (yellow and black tubes). The displacement of αCT is indicated by a red arrow. Panel c in addition shows the steric overlap of the C-terminus of insulin B-chain (cyan tube) in free hormone with αCT position in the hormone-bound structure. The chain/domain coloring and labeling scheme is same as in Figure 1.
Membranes 04 00730 g002
While the recent structures of insulin bound to truncated receptors [58] have revealed unprecedented detail of registry (at Site 1) between hormone and IR, it is apparent that the conformation of hormone in these structures cannot be accommodated in the apo-IR ectodomain due to significant steric overlap [19,58] with the F1 and F2 domains (Figure 3a). This observation has led to two possibilities in that: (a) the F1-F2 pair has to undergo a conformational change [19] in the apo-IR ectodomain to accommodate insulin conformation observed in complexes with truncated receptors [58]; or (b) insulin/αCT may have to further rearrange in the ectodomain binding pocket if the F1-F2 pair was to maintain the conformation observed in the apo-IR ectodomain (PDB codes 2DTG and 3LOH). The second possibility can be discounted for various reasons: (1) a “see-saw” model [7] of negative-cooperativity in insulin binding [10] and a “harmonic-oscillator” model of receptor activation [60] require ligand-bound IR structure to be asymmetric unlike the symmetric conformation of the apo-IR ectodomain (Figure 1b); (b) the contacts of insulin with L1/αCT observed in truncated receptors [58,59] are consistent with a plethora of experimental evidence and therefore unlikely to change significantly; (c) a conformational change in the receptor is required to initiate signaling via activation of intracellular kinase modules [17]. In the absence of structural data on an insulin-bound IR ectodomain, the hypothesis concerning displacement of the F1-F2 pair (vide supra) can be tested using detailed atomistic simulation techniques as described below.
Membranes 04 00730 g003 1024
Figure 3. Insulin/IR complexes. (a) Alignment of insulin-bound structure of IR fragment (PDB code 3W11) with the apo-IR ectodomain (PDB code 3LOH). Insulin chains (A-chain, yellow; B-chain, black) and the F1 (magenta) and F2 (blue) domains of IR are rendered as space-filling, while the L1 domain (brown) is shown in a cartoon representation. Area of overlap between insulin residues and the F1/F2 loops is marked by a white arc. (b) Same view as in a from an all-atom structural model of insulin bound to IR ectodomain by Vashisth and Abrams [61]. Some residues of insulin are hidden behind the F1 and F2 domains. (c) Overlay of insulin/αCT on the L1 surface (brown) from the insulin-bound crystal structure (tubes) shown in a, and from the predicted model (cartoons) shown in b. White arrows indicate possible rotation of insulin/αCT (on the L1 surface) required to achieve crystal conformations starting with the predicted model conformations
Figure 3. Insulin/IR complexes. (a) Alignment of insulin-bound structure of IR fragment (PDB code 3W11) with the apo-IR ectodomain (PDB code 3LOH). Insulin chains (A-chain, yellow; B-chain, black) and the F1 (magenta) and F2 (blue) domains of IR are rendered as space-filling, while the L1 domain (brown) is shown in a cartoon representation. Area of overlap between insulin residues and the F1/F2 loops is marked by a white arc. (b) Same view as in a from an all-atom structural model of insulin bound to IR ectodomain by Vashisth and Abrams [61]. Some residues of insulin are hidden behind the F1 and F2 domains. (c) Overlay of insulin/αCT on the L1 surface (brown) from the insulin-bound crystal structure (tubes) shown in a, and from the predicted model (cartoons) shown in b. White arrows indicate possible rotation of insulin/αCT (on the L1 surface) required to achieve crystal conformations starting with the predicted model conformations
Membranes 04 00730 g003
Building on our earlier work on all-atom structural models of ligand-bound IR [62] and IGF1R [63], we independently investigated the displacement of αCT on insulin binding to the IR ectodomain [61]. This work coincidently appeared around the publication of the crystal structures of insulin bound to truncated IR [58] and showed that (a) αCT is displaced on insulin binding; (b) the C-terminus of the insulin B-chain is likely positioned between L1 and αCT with PheB24 and TyrB26 oriented toward L1, while PheB25 and ThrB27 toward αCT (Figure 5A in ref. [61]); and (c) the clockwise rotation of insulin/αCT together on the L1 surface leads to thermodynamically favorable (lower in free-energy) states. Importantly, there is no structural overlap between bound insulin and the F1-F2 pair in our previous model (Figure 3b). As a result, our predicted placement of insulin/αCT on the L1 surface is different from what is observed in a typical hormone-bound crystal structure (Figure 3c). Given that the IR ectodomain is flexible [62] and our predicted conformation of insulin/αCT is a metastable state, we speculated earlier that further structural rearrangements of insulin/αCT on the L1 surface are possible [61]. In fact, the overlay reveals that the crystal conformation of insulin/αCT may be achieved via a further clockwise rotation (white arrows in Figure 3c) of our predicted conformation on the L1 surface. In our earlier work [61], this would have additionally required displacement of the F1-F2 pair, a conformational change significantly challenging to observe in unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations primarily due to difficulties in overcoming high free-energy barriers.
In this work, we judiciously combine our previous all-atom model [61] of insulin/IR∆β with information from crystallographically-resolved position of insulin/αCT [58] to directly show that crystal conformation of insulin can be achieved in the IR ectodomain, which in part is facilitated by a different placement of the F1-F2 pair. Interestingly, we find that such flexibility is present in the apo-IR ectodomain structure thereby reinforcing our previous suggestion that insulin recognition may be a ligand conformational-selection phenomenon [61]. Specifically, in a series of steps we carry out flexible fitting of our previous all-atom insulin/IR∆β model into simulated density maps created using crystal structures [58], and screening of receptor conformations from equilibration trajectories of the apo-IR ectodomain using our previously successful docking procedure [61,62,63]. The outcome is an all-atom model of insulin/IR∆β without any steric overlap of insulin and IR. Consistent with latest crystal structures [59], we also find that position of the C-terminus of insulin B-chain in our model is likely between L1 and αCT. We also outline key structural features of the IR ectodomain conformation in our new model when compared against the apo-IR ectodomain (PDB codes 2DTG and 3LOH).

2. Methods

2.1. Molecular Dynamics Flexible Fitting

Molecular Dynamics Flexible Fitting (MDFF) [64,65,66] is a simulation technique that incorporates information from an experimental or simulated electron microscopy (EM) map into an MD simulation for fitting an initial model of biomolecule in the target density map. Essentially, external steering forces arising from the potential encoded in the EM map are applied on top of the interatomic MD potential (force-field). Additional restraining forces can also be applied during fitting to prevent structural distortions and preserve secondary structure elements, to maintain stereochemistry [67] as well as the symmetry (if any) [68] of the biomolecule. A scaling factor ξ > 0 can be used to uniformly tune the effect of target map on all atoms. MDFF has been widely applied [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77] to solve structures of large macromolecular complexes such as the ribosome. We have recently tested the effect of varying structural restraints as well as map resolution on fitting via MDFF, and provided recommendations for fitting proteins, nucleic acids, and their complexes [78,79].
In this work, we used MDFF to fit our previously proposed insulin/IR∆β structural model [61] into simulated density maps created using insulin/IR co-crystal structures [58]. Specifically, we created individual as well as combined density maps (at ∼4 Å resolution and with a grid-spacing of 1 Å) of the L1 domain, insulin, and αCT using complex A (PDB code 3W11) of Menting et al. [58]. We created all density maps after alignment of the L1 domain of the crystal structure with the L1 domain of our previous model. For generating simulated density maps and associated map-derived potentials, we followed the previously established MDFF procedures [64,65,66].The starting model for fitting was built in the following way: first we extracted (from our previous model) the coordinates of L1/insulin/αCT, then we extended αCT to include residues 711–715 (after Cα-alignment of residues 705–710 of the conformation of αCT in the crystal structure with the conformation of αCT in our previous model), following which, using our earlier Monte Carlo (MC) docking procedure [61,62,63] on equilibrated MD trajectories of the apo-IR ectodomain, we extensively searched for apo-IR conformations having no overlap with the target density map of L1/insulin/αCT, and finally we included coordinates of rest of the IR ectodomain from one of the lowest-energy states resulting from MC search. All hydrogens were included in our initial model as well as in the crystal structure from which maps were generated (vide supra). All simulations were carried out using NAMD [80,81] and the CHARMM force-field with the CMAP correction [82,83]. During fitting, all secondary structure elements were restrained with a force constant of k = 300 kcal mol−1 rad−2, and additional restraints were used to maintain the correct chirality of all chiral centers and trans-configurations of peptide bonds. The overall fitting procedure was optimized in three different steps: first by keeping insulin positionally-restrained, L1/αCT were allowed to flexibly fit using a combined density map of L1/αCT, then by keeping αCT positionally-restrained, fitting of insulin was carried out using a combined density map of L1/insulin, and finally L1/insulin/αCT were further fitted together (without restraints) using a combined density map of L1/insulin/αCT. The L1 density was eventually removed to further refine insulin/αCT, but it did not result in any significant improvement of model because all structural components are already correctly placed in the density after three-step procedure described above. The final model was energy-minimized and briefly MD-equilibrated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. MDFF Fitting

In Figure 4, we show the root-mean-squared-deviation (RMSD) evolution of Cα-atoms of L1/insulin/αCT relative to the crystal conformation (PDB code 3W11) during MDFF fitting. In step 1 (0 to 0.2 ns), we observe that nearly complete fitting of L1 is achieved while only a few N-terminal residues of αCT are fitted during this step which results in a straightened αCT conformation on the L1 surface. A major change in RMSD (∼6 Å) is observed during step 2 (0.2 to 1.1 ns) where both chains of insulin are successfully fitted. At the beginning of step 3, both L1 and insulin are already placed in their respective density maps but the C-terminus of αCT is still outside its target density, which is fitted in this final refinement step (1.1 to 1.3 ns). At the end of this three-step procedure, L1, insulin, and αCT are correctly placed in their target maps as indicated by a high final cross-correlation coefficient (CCC = 0.942) compared to its initial value (CCC = 0.745). The fitting process had no significant effect on the other domains of IR. The success of MDFF fitting suggests that the initial placement of L1/insulin/αCT observed in our previous model [61] is indeed a metastable state from which crystallographic conformation can be obtained. With regard to MDFF, it is important to point out that initially misplaced structure can still be fitted using MDFF in the target density map (due to underlying potential) albeit in a wrong orientation [78]. Therefore, it is noteworthy here that MDFF results in a correct placement of L1/insulin/αCT in the target density. In addition, as suggested in the introduction (Figure 3c), MDFF indeed proceeds by fitting insulin/αCT via a clockwise rotation (combined with displacement) on the L1 surface.
Membranes 04 00730 g004 1024
Figure 4. MDFF fitting of our initial insulin/IR∆β model into the target density maps of L1/insulin/αCT. The trace of Cα-RMSD vs. simulation time (ns) for L1/insulin/αCT with respect to their final conformation in the crystal structure (PDB code 3W11) is shown. Snapshots are rendered at the beginning of MDFF run, and at the end of each step in the three-step procedure (see Methods). The coloring scheme for chains/domains is same as in Figure 3c. Maps are rendered as a wireframe mesh in same color as protein. Other domains of IR∆β are omitted for clarity.
Figure 4. MDFF fitting of our initial insulin/IR∆β model into the target density maps of L1/insulin/αCT. The trace of Cα-RMSD vs. simulation time (ns) for L1/insulin/αCT with respect to their final conformation in the crystal structure (PDB code 3W11) is shown. Snapshots are rendered at the beginning of MDFF run, and at the end of each step in the three-step procedure (see Methods). The coloring scheme for chains/domains is same as in Figure 3c. Maps are rendered as a wireframe mesh in same color as protein. Other domains of IR∆β are omitted for clarity.
Membranes 04 00730 g004

3.2. MDFF-Generated Model: Key Features

Salient features of our MDFF-generated model of insulin/IR∆β complex are shown in Figure 5. The overall orientation of insulin/αCT on the L1 surface is nearly identical to what is observed in the crystal structures of Menting et al. [58], while conformation of the F1-F2 pair is such that (vide infra) no overlap between insulin and the F1-F2 pair is observed (Figure 5a). The contacts at Site 1 between insulin and IR are also similar (Figure 5b) to the crystal structure (PDB code 3W11), while at site 2 (Figure 5c,d) we observe insulin residues (i) A12, A13, A14, A15, A17 in the vicinity of F1 residues R554, G555, L556, K557, and Y562; (ii) A10 and B18 near residues Y507 and K484 (F1), respectively; and (iii) B10 and B13 in the vicinity of S596, L599, D620, and P621 (F2). Other suggested Site 2 residues of the F2 domain (Ile602 and Lys616) are relatively distant from Site 2 residues on insulin. In addition, simultaneous contacts of insulin with Site 1 and Site 2 on IR, as observed here, is consistent with ligand cross-linking of receptor subunits [84] as well as a proposed sequential model [85] of association of insulin with IR (via Site 1 and 2).
Membranes 04 00730 g005 1024
Figure 5. MDFF-generated model of insulin/IR∆β. (a) Final placement of insulin/αCT is shown in the MDFF-generated model of hormone/receptor complex. The hormone/receptor chains/domains are uniquely colored and labeled. Other domains of IR∆β are omitted for clarity. (b,c) Interacting residues at Site 1 and Site 2 of hormone (ins) and receptor (IR) are highlighted. Contacts at Site 1 are consistent with crystal structures [58], and no steric clash is present with suggested Site 2 residues [4,40] located in loops of the F1 and F2 domains. (d) Residue-residue contacts between insulin and IR at Site 2 are highlighted.
Figure 5. MDFF-generated model of insulin/IR∆β. (a) Final placement of insulin/αCT is shown in the MDFF-generated model of hormone/receptor complex. The hormone/receptor chains/domains are uniquely colored and labeled. Other domains of IR∆β are omitted for clarity. (b,c) Interacting residues at Site 1 and Site 2 of hormone (ins) and receptor (IR) are highlighted. Contacts at Site 1 are consistent with crystal structures [58], and no steric clash is present with suggested Site 2 residues [4,40] located in loops of the F1 and F2 domains. (d) Residue-residue contacts between insulin and IR at Site 2 are highlighted.
Membranes 04 00730 g005
We further compare the IR∆β conformation in our model with that of apo-IR∆β (Figure 6a,b). We quantify conformational differences by using our previously defined [61,62] collective-variable conformational metrics (based upon the centers-of-mass of domains) of IR∆β such as interdomain hinge-angles. Because apo-IR∆β crystal structure is symmetric (Figure 1b), all pairs of interdomain hinge angles are identical in the IR homodimer: the F1-F2 hinges are at 160.80°, the F2-F3 hinges are at 174.59°, the L1-L2 hinges are at 90.33°, and the apex L2-F1 hinges are at 81.5°. On insulin-bound side of IR∆β in our model, we observe that the F1-F2, F2-F3, and L1-L2 hinges are contracted by 9°, 13°, and 7° (in comparison to apo-IR∆β), respectively, while the L2-F1 hinge at the apex of IR∆β is open by 6°. On the other (unliganded) binding pocket, the F1-F2 and F2-F3 hinges are nearly identical to apo-IR∆β, while the L1-L2 and apex L2-F1 hinges are contracted by 14° and 3°, respectively. The closing of F1-F2 and L1-L2 hinges coupled with the opening of the apical L2-F1 hinge on one side of the IR homodimer leads to one binding pocket more open than the other; an asymmetric flexibility mechanism we have earlier observed in apo-IR∆β [62]. Consistent with a “see-saw” model [7] of negative-cooperativity [10] and a “harmonic-oscillator” model of receptor activation [60], the conformation of IR∆β in our model is asymmetric. The exact conformations of the L1-F1-F2 motifs from our model and the apo-IR∆β crystal structure are also depicted (Figure 6c,d), and show that closing of the F1-F2 hinge leads to a displaced conformation of the F1-F2 pair that can accommodate insulin in crystallographic position without any steric clashes.
Membranes 04 00730 g006 1024
Figure 6. Comparison of apo-IR∆β and MDFF-generated model. (a,b) Overlay of apo-IR crystal structure (brown; PDB code 3LOH) and our MDFF-generated model (yellow). Front (a) and top (b) views are rendered. The dotted black line represents the location of membrane. Insulin and αCT are omitted. (c,d) Displacement of the F1-F2 pair is highlighted. Conformation of the L1-F1-F2 fragment from the apo-IR crystal structure (left panel in c) and our model (right panel in c) of insulin/IR∆β complex; structures were aligned based upon Cα-atoms of the L1 domain. Overlay of panels displayed in c is also shown without (left panel in d) and with (right panel in d) insulin/αCT (space-filling), respectively.
Figure 6. Comparison of apo-IR∆β and MDFF-generated model. (a,b) Overlay of apo-IR crystal structure (brown; PDB code 3LOH) and our MDFF-generated model (yellow). Front (a) and top (b) views are rendered. The dotted black line represents the location of membrane. Insulin and αCT are omitted. (c,d) Displacement of the F1-F2 pair is highlighted. Conformation of the L1-F1-F2 fragment from the apo-IR crystal structure (left panel in c) and our model (right panel in c) of insulin/IR∆β complex; structures were aligned based upon Cα-atoms of the L1 domain. Overlay of panels displayed in c is also shown without (left panel in d) and with (right panel in d) insulin/αCT (space-filling), respectively.
Membranes 04 00730 g006
Finally, we attempted to model the conformation of the flexible C-terminus of the B-chain of insulin in our MDFF-generated model. Aligning the conformation of insulin from our previous model of this complex [61] with that in the crystal structure reveals that the C-terminus of insulin B-chain is likely located between L1 and the C-terminus of αCT with minor steric clashes of residues B29/B30 of insulin with L1 (cyan tube in Figure 6a). Therefore, we carried out a short MC-refinement of the C-terminus of insulin B-chain by selecting low-energy states from an ensemble of conformations of this motif previously generated by enhanced sampling and free-energy methods [61]. One such conformation of the C-terminus of insulin B-chain was incorporated in the MDFF-generated model, and the resulting complex was briefly equilibrated in explicit water. The overlay of many conformations of L1/insulin/αCT from this short MD-run is shown in Figure 6b, where C-terminus of insulin B-chain appears to fluctuate between L1 and αCT. These conformations are qualitatively similar to recently-resolved [59] position of the C-terminus of insulin B-chain.
Membranes 04 00730 g007 1024
Figure 7. Conformation of the C-terminus of insulin B-chain. (a) Insulin conformation from our previous [61] structural model of insulin/IR∆β(brighter tubes) is overlayed on the insulin conformation in the hormone-bound crystal structure (darker tubes, PDB code 3W11). Alignment of insulin from both structures suggests new location of the separated C-terminus of insulin B-chain (cyan tube). (b) MD-equilibrated ensemble of L1/insulin/αCT configurations from MDFF-generated model after incorporation of the C-terminus of the B-chain of insulin (cyan). Other domains of IR∆β are not shown for clarity.
Figure 7. Conformation of the C-terminus of insulin B-chain. (a) Insulin conformation from our previous [61] structural model of insulin/IR∆β(brighter tubes) is overlayed on the insulin conformation in the hormone-bound crystal structure (darker tubes, PDB code 3W11). Alignment of insulin from both structures suggests new location of the separated C-terminus of insulin B-chain (cyan tube). (b) MD-equilibrated ensemble of L1/insulin/αCT configurations from MDFF-generated model after incorporation of the C-terminus of the B-chain of insulin (cyan). Other domains of IR∆β are not shown for clarity.
Membranes 04 00730 g007

4. Conclusions

In this work, we have presented an all-atom structural model of an insulin/IR∆β complex, where insulin conformation is consistent with hormone-bound structures of truncated receptors. Importantly, we show that crystallographic conformation of insulin can be accommodated in the IR ectodomain conformation in our model without steric clashes. On the ligand-bound side of IR in our model, a different placement (relative to apo-IR∆β) of the first two type-III fibronectin domains (F1 and F2) of receptor supports the previously suggested hypothesis [19,58] that a conformational change in these two domains is needed for insulin docking in the IR ectodomain. We also observe simultaneous contacts at Site 1 and Site 2 between insulin and IR, and suggest that the C-terminus of insulin B-chain is likely located between L1 and αCT. This work also demonstrates how structural information from experiments can be combined with simulation techniques to further refine all-atom models.
The atomic coordinates of the model presented in this work can be obtained from the author on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hossein Mohammadiarani for a critical reading of the manuscript. We acknowledge seed funding from the University of New Hampshire, and computational resources in part by the National Science Foundation (TG-MCB140029) through XSEDE resources provided by the XSEDE Science Gateways program.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Steiner, D. Adeventures with insulin in the Islets of Langerhans. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 17399–17421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ullrich, A.; Bell, J.R.; Chen, E.Y.; Herrera, R.; Petruzzelli, L.M.; Dull, T.J.; Gray, A.; Coussens, L.; Liao, Y.C.; Tsubokawa, M.; et al. Human insulin receptor and its relationship to the tyrosine kinase family of oncogenes. Nature 1985, 313, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Meyts, P.; Whittaker, J. Structural biology of insulin and IGF1 receptors: implications for drug design. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2002, 1, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De Meyts, P. Insulin and its receptor: structure, function and evolution. BioEssays 2004, 26, 1351–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. De Meyts, P. The insulin receptor: A prototype for dimeric, allosteric membrane receptors? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008, 33, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Adams, M.J.; Blundell, T.; Dodson, E.; Dodson, G.; Vijayan, M.; Baker, E.; Harding, M.; Hodgkin, D.; Rimmer, B.; Sheat, S. Structure of rhombohedral 2 zinc insulin crystals. Nature 1969, 224, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McKern, N.; Lawrence, M.; Streltsov, V.; Lou, M.; Adams, T.; Lovrecz, G.; Elleman, T.; Richards, K.; Bentley, J.; Pilling, P.; et al. Structure of the insulin receptor ectodomain reveals a folded-over conformation. Nature 2006, 443, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Smith, B.; Huang, K.; Kong, G.; Chan, S.; Nakagawa, S.; Menting, J.; Hu, S.; Whittaker, J.; Steiner, D.; Katsoyannis, P.; et al. Structural resolution of a tandem hormone-binding element in the insulin receptor and its implications for design of peptide agonists. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 6771–6776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lou, M.; Garrett, T.; McKern, N.; Hoyne, P.; Epa, V.; Bentley, J.; Lovrecz, G.; Cosgrove, L.; Frenkel, M.; Ward, C. The first three domains of the insulin receptor differ structurally from the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor in the regions governing ligand specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12429–12434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. De Meyts, P. The structural basis of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor binding and negative co-operativity, and its relevance to mitogenic versus metabolic signalling. Diabetologia 1994, 37, S135–S148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ward, C.W.; Garrett, T.P. The relationship between the L1 and L2 domains of the insulin and epidermal growth factor receptors and leucine-rich repeat modules. BMC Bioinformatics 2001, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ward, C.; Lawrence, M.; Streltsov, V.; Adams, T.; McKern, N. The insulin and EGF receptor structures: new insights into ligand-induced receptor activation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007, 32, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ward, C.; Lawrence, M.; Streltsov, V.; Garrett, T.; McKern, N.; Lou, M.; Lovrecz, G.; Adams, T. Structural insights into ligand-induced activation of the insulin receptor. Acta Physiol. 2008, 192, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ward, C.W.; Lawrence, M.C. Ligand-induced activation of the insulin receptor: A multi-step process involving structural changes in both the ligand and the receptor. Bioessays 2009, 31, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lawrence, M.; McKern, N.; Ward, C. Insulin receptor structure and its implications for the IGF-1 receptor. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2007, 17, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ward, C.W.; Lawrence, M.C. Landmarks in insulin research. Front. Endocrin. 2011, 2, 76. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ward, C.; Lawrence, M. Similar but different: ligand-induced activation of the insulin and epidermal growth factor receptor families. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ward, C.W.; Menting, J.G.; Lawrence, M.C. The insulin receptor changes conformation in unforeseen ways on ligand binding: sharpening the picture of insulin receptor activation. BioEssays 2013, 35, 945–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hubbard, S.R. Structural biology: Insulin meets its receptor. Nature 2013, 493, 171–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ullrich, A.; Gray, A.; Tam, A.W.; Yangfeng, T.; Tsubokawa, M.; Collins, C.; Henzel, W.; Lebon, T.; Kathuria, S.; Chen, E.; et al. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor primary structure-Comparison with insulin-receptor suggests structural determinants that define functional specificity. EMBO J. 1986, 5, 2503–2512. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Whitten, A.; Smith, B.; Menting, J.; Margetts, M.; McKern, N.; Lovrecz, G.; Adams, T.; Richards, K.; Bentley, J.; Trewhella, J.; et al. Solution structure of ectodomains of the insulin receptor family: the ectodomain of the Type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor displays asymmetry of ligand binding accompanied by limited conformational change. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 394, 878–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pullen, R.; Lindsay, D.; Wood, S.; Tickle, I.; Blundell, T.; Wollmer, A.; Krail, G.; Brandenburg, D.; Zahn, H.; Gliemann, J.; et al. Receptor-binding region of insulin. Nature 1976, 259, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. De Meyts, P.; Obberghen, E.; Roth, J.; Wollmer, A.; Brandenburg, D. Mapping of the residues responsible for the negative cooperativity of the receptor-binding region of insulin. Nature 1978, 273, 504–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kristensen, C.; Kjeldsen, T.; Wiberg, F.; Schäffer, L.; Hach, M.; Havelund, S.; Bass, J.; Steiner, D.; Andersen, A. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of insulin. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 12978–12983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, H.; Shi, M.; Guo, Z.; Tang, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Liang, Z.; Feng, Y. Four new monomeric insulins obtained by alanine scanning the dimer-forming surface of the insulin molecule. Protein Eng. 2000, 13, 779–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nakamura, T.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, M.; Shimba, N.; Suzuki, E.i.; Shimada, I. Direct determination of the insulin-insulin receptor interface using transferred cross-saturation experiments. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 1917–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Williams, P.; Mynarcik, D.; Yu, G.; Whittaker, J. Mapping of an NH2-terminal ligand binding site of the insulin receptor by alanine scanning mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 3012–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Whittaker, J.; Whittaker, L. Characterization of the functional insulin binding epitopes of the full-length insulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 20932–20936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mynarcik, D.; Williams, P.; Schaffer, L.; Yu, G.; Whittaker, J. Analog binding properties of insulin receptor mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 2077–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schaefer, E.; Siddle, K.; Ellis, L. Deletion analysis of the human insulin receptor ectodomain reveals independently folded soluble subdomains and insulin binding by a monomeric α-subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 13248–13253. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Kristensen, C.; Andersen, A.; Hach, M.; Wiberg, F.; Schäffer, L.; Kjeldsen, T. A single-chain insulin-like growth factor I/insulin hybrid binds with high affinity to the insulin receptor. Biochem. J. 1995, 305, 981–986. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Schlein, M.; Havelund, S.; Kristensen, C.; Dunn, M.; Kaarsholm, N. Ligand-induced conformational change in the minimized insulin receptor. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 303, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Brandt, J.; Andersen, A.; Kristensen, C. Dimeric fragment of the insulin receptor α-subunit binds insulin with full holoreceptor affinity. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 12378–12384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Surinya, K.; Molina, L.; Soos, M.; Brandt, J.; Kristensen, C.; Siddle, K. Role of insulin receptor dimerization domains in ligand binding, cooperativity, and modulation by anti-receptor antibodies. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 16718–16725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kristensen, C.; Andersen, A.; Østergaard, S.; Hansen, P.; Brandt, J. Functional reconstitution of insulin receptor binding site from non-binding receptor fragments. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 18340–18345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kurose, T.; Pashmforoush, M.; Yoshimasa, Y.; Carroll, R.; Schwartz, G.; Burke, G.; Katsoyannis, P.; Steiner, D. Cross-linking of a B25 Azidophenylalanine insulin derivative to the carboxyl-terminal regions of the α-subunit of the insulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 29190–29197. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Mynarcik, D.; Yu, G.; Whittaker, J. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of a C-terminal ligand binding domain in the insulin receptor α subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 2439–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kristensen, C.; Wiberg, F.; Andersen, A. Specificity of insulin and insulin-like growth factor I receptors investigated using chimeric mini-receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 37351–37356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Molina, L.; Marino-Buslje, C.; Quinn, D.; Siddle, K. Structural domains of the insulin receptor and IGF receptor required for dimerization and ligand binding. FEBS Lett. 2000, 467, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Whittaker, L.; Hao, C.; Fu, W.; Whittaker, J. High-affinity insulin binding: insulin interacts with two receptor ligand binding sites. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 12900–12909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, B.; Roth, R. A region of the insulin receptor important for ligand binding (residues 450-601) is recognized by patients’ autoimmune antibodies and inhibitory monoclonal antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 9858–9862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fabry, M.; Schaefer, E.; Ellis, L.; Kojro, E.; Fahrenholz, F.; Brandenburg, D. Detection of a new hormone contact site within the insulin receptor ectodomain by the use of a novel photoreactive insulin. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 8950–8956. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Schumacher, R.; Soos, M.; Schlessinger, J.; Brandenburg, D.; Siddle, K.; Ullrich, A. Signaling-competent receptor chimeras allow mapping of major insulin receptor binding domain determinants. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Hao, C.; Whittaker, L.; Whittaker, J. Characterization of a second ligand binding site of the insulin receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 347, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Benyoucef, S.; Surinya, K.; Hadaschik, D.; Siddle, K. Characterization of insulin/IGF hybrid receptors: contributions of the insulin receptor L2 and Fn1 domains and the alternatively spliced exon 11 sequence to ligand binding and receptor activation. Biochem. J. 2007, 403, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Renteria, M.; Gandhi, H.; Vinuesa, P.; Helmerhorst, E.; Mancera, R. A comparative structural bioinformatics analysis of the insulin receptor family ectodomain based on phylogenetic information. PLoS One 2008, 3, e3667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hua, Q.X.; Shoelson, S.E.; Kochoyan, M.; Weiss, M. Receptor-binding redefined by a structural switch in a mutant human insulin. Nature 1991, 354, 238–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ludvigsen, S.; Olsen, H.; Kaarsholm, N. A structural switch in a mutant insulin exposes key residues for receptor binding. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 279, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wan, Z.L.; Huang, K.; Xu, B.; Hu, S.Q.; Wang, S.H.; Chu, Y.C.; Katsoyannis, P.G.; Weiss, M.A. Diabetes-associated mutations in human insulin: Crystal structure and photo-cross-linking studies of A-chain variant insulin Wakayama. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 5000–5016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Jiracek, J.; Zakova, L.; Antolikova, E.; Watson, C.J.; Turkenburg, J.P.; Dodson, G.G.; Brzozowski, A.M. Implications for the active form of human insulin based on the structural convergence of highly active hormone analogues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1966–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pillutla, R.C.; Hsiao, K.C.; Beasley, J.R.; Brandt, J.; Ostergaard, S.; Hansen, P.H.; Spetzler, J.C.; Danielsen, G.M.; Andersen, A.S.; Brissette, R.E.; et al. Peptides identify the critical hotspots involved in the biological activation of the insulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 22590–22594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Schaffer, L.; Brissette, R.E.; Spetzler, J.C.; Pillutla, R.C.; Ostergaard, S.; Lennick, M.; Brandt, J.; Fletcher, P.W.; Danielsen, G.M.; Hsiao, K.C. ;et al. Assembly of high-affinity insulin receptor agonists and antagonists from peptide building blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 4435–4439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Huang, K.; Xu, B.; Hu, S.; Chu, Y.; Hua, Q.; Qu, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, S.; Wang, R.; Nakagawa, S.; et al. How insulin binds: The B-chain α-helix contacts the L1 β-helix of the insulin receptor. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 341, 529–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Huang, K.; Chan, S.; Hua, Q.; Chu, Y.; Wang, R.; Klaproth, B.; Jia, W.; Whittaker, J.; De Meyts, P.; Nakagawa, S.; et al. The A-chain of insulin contacts the insert domain of the insulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 35337–35349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xu, B.; Huang, K.; Chu, Y.C.; Hu, S.Q.; Nakagawa, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, R.Y.; Whittaker, J.; Katsoyannis, P.G.; Weiss, M. Decoding the cryptic active conformation of a protein by synthetic photoscanning: Insulin inserts a detachable arm between receptor domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 14597–14608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Menting, J.; Ward, C.; Margetts, M.; Lawrence, M. A thermodynamic study of ligand binding to the first three domains of the human insulin receptor: relationship between the receptor alpha-chain C-terminal peptide and the site-1 insulin mimetic peptides. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 5492–5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Whittaker, J.; Whittaker, L.; Roberts, C., Jr; Phillips, N.; Ismail-Beigi, F.; Lawrence, M.; Weiss, M. α-Helical element at the hormone-binding surface of the insulin receptor functions as a signaling element to activate its tyrosine kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11166–11171. [Google Scholar]
  58. Menting, J.G.; Whittaker, J.; Margetts, M.B.; Whittaker, L.J.; Kong, G.K.W.; Smith, B.J.; Watson, C.J.; Žáková, L.; Kletvíková, E.; Jirácˇek, J.; et al. How insulin engages its primary binding site on the insulin receptor. Nature 2013, 493, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Menting, J.G.; Yang, Y.; Chan, S.J.; Phillips, N.B.; Smith, B.J.; Whittaker, J.; Wickramasinghe, N.P.; Whittaker, L.J.; Pandyarajan, V.; Wan, Z.l.; et al. Protective hinge in insulin opens to enable its receptor engagement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E3395–E3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kiselyov, V.; Versteyhe, S.; Gauguin, L.; De Meyts, P. Harmonic oscillator model of the insulin and IGF1 receptors’ allosteric binding and activation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vashisth, H.; Abrams, C.F. All-atom structural models of insulin binding to the insulin receptor in the presence of a tandem hormone-binding element . Proteins 2013, 81, 1017–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Vashisth, H.; Abrams, C.F. Docking of insulin to a structurally equilibrated insulin receptor ectodomain. Proteins 2010, 78, 1531–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Vashisth, H.; Abrams, C.F. All-atom structural models for complexes of insulin-like growth factors IGF1 and IGF2 with their cognate receptor. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 400, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Trabuco, L.G.; Villa, E.; Mitra, K.; Frank, J.; Schulten, K. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure 2008, 16, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Trabuco, L.G.; Villa, E.; Schreiner, E.; Harrison, C.B.; Schulten, K. Molecular dynamics flexible fitting: A practical guide to combine cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography. Methods 2009, 49, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Trabuco, L.G.; Schreiner, E.; Gumbart, J.; Hsin, J.; Villa, E.; Schulten, K. Applications of the molecular dynamics flexible fitting method. J. Struct. Biol. 2011, 173, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Schreiner, E.; Trabuco, L.G.; Freddolino, P.L.; Schulten, K. Stereochemical errors and their implications for molecular dynamics simulations. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chan, K.Y.; Gumbart, J.; McGreevy, R.; Watermeyer, J.M.; Sewell, B.T.; Schulten, K. Symmetry-restrained flexible fitting for symmetric EM maps. Structure 2011, 19, 1211–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Gumbart, J.; Trabuco, L.G.; Schreiner, E.; Villa, E.; Schulten, K. Regulation of the protein-conducting channel by a bound ribosome. Structure 2009, 17, 1453–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Hsin, J.; Gumbart, J.; Trabuco, L.G.; Villa, E.; Qian, P.; Hunter, C.N.; Schulten, K. Protein-induced membrane curvature investigated through molecular dynamics flexible fitting. Biophys. J. 2009, 97, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Li, W.; Trabuco, L.G.; Schulten, K.; Frank, J. Molecular dynamics of EF-G during translocation. Proteins 2011, 79, 1478–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Trabuco, L.G.; Schreiner, E.; Eargle, J.; Cornish, P.; Ha, T.; Luthey-Schulten, Z.; Schulten, K. The role of L1 stalk-tRNA interaction in the ribosome elongation cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 402, 741–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sener, M.; Hsin, J.; Trabuco, L.G.; Villa, E.; Qian, P.; Hunter, C.N.; Schulten, K. Structural model and excitonic properties of the dimeric RC-LH1-Pufx complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Chem. Phys. 2009, 357, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Armache, J.P.; Jarasch, A.; Anger, A.M.; Villa, E.; Becker, T.; Bhushan, S.; Jossinet, F.; Habeck, M.; Dindar, G.; Franckenberg, S.; et al. Cryo-EM structure and rRNA model of a translating eukaryotic 80S ribosome at 5.5 Å resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 19748–19753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Armache, J.P.; Jarasch, A.; Anger, A.M.; Villa, E.; Becker, T.; Bhushan, S.; Jossinet, F.; Habeck, M.; Dindar, G.; Franckenberg, S.; et al. Localization of eukaryote-specific ribosomal proteins in a 5.5 Å cryo-EM map of the 80S eukaryotic ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 19754–19759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Agirrezabala, X.; Schreiner, E.; Trabuco, L.G.; Lei, J.; Ortiz-Meoz, R.F.; Schulten, K.; Green, R.; Frank, J. Structural insights into cognate versus near-cognate discrimination during decoding. EMBO J. 2011, 30, 1497–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Strunk, B.S.; Loucks, C.R.; Su, M.; Vashisth, H.; Cheng, S.; Schilling, J.; Brooks, C.L., III.; Karbstein, K.; Skiniotis, G. Ribosome assembly factors prevent premature translation initiation by 40S assembly intermediates. Science 2011, 333, 1449–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Vashisth, H.; Skiniotis, G.; Brooks, C.L., III. Using enhanced sampling and structural restraints to refine atomic structures into low-resolution electron microscopy maps. Structure 2012, 20, 1453–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Vashisth, H.; Skiniotis, G.; Brooks, C.L., III. Enhanced sampling and overfitting analyses in structural refinement of nucleic acids into electron microscopy maps. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 3738–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Phillips, J.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R.; Kalé, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1781–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kalé, L.; Skeel, R.; Bhandarkar, M.; Brunner, R.; Gursoy, A.; Krawetz, N.; Phillips, J.; Shinozaki, A.; Varadarajan, K.; Schulten, K. NAMD2: Greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 151, 283–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. MacKerell, A.D., Jr.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, R.L., Jr.; Evanseck, J.D.; Field, M.J.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S.; et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. MacKerell, A.D., Jr.; Feig, M.; Brooks, C.L., III. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1400–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chan, S.; Nakagawa, S.; Steiner, D. Complementation analysis demonstrates that insulin cross-links both α-subunits in a truncated insulin receptor dimer. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 13754–13758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Thorsoe, K.S.; Schlein, M.; Steensgaard, D.B.; Brandt, J.; Schluckebier, G.; Naver, H. Kinetic evidence for the sequential association of insulin binding sites 1 and 2 to the insulin receptor and the influence of receptor isoform. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 6234–6246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vashisth, H. Flexibility in the Insulin Receptor Ectodomain Enables Docking of Insulin in Crystallographic Conformation Observed in a Hormone-Bound Microreceptor. Membranes 2014, 4, 730-746. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes4040730

AMA Style

Vashisth H. Flexibility in the Insulin Receptor Ectodomain Enables Docking of Insulin in Crystallographic Conformation Observed in a Hormone-Bound Microreceptor. Membranes. 2014; 4(4):730-746. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes4040730

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vashisth, Harish. 2014. "Flexibility in the Insulin Receptor Ectodomain Enables Docking of Insulin in Crystallographic Conformation Observed in a Hormone-Bound Microreceptor" Membranes 4, no. 4: 730-746. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes4040730

APA Style

Vashisth, H. (2014). Flexibility in the Insulin Receptor Ectodomain Enables Docking of Insulin in Crystallographic Conformation Observed in a Hormone-Bound Microreceptor. Membranes, 4(4), 730-746. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes4040730

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop