Next Article in Journal
Membrane Emulsification—A Novel Solution for Treatment and Reuse of Produced Water from Oil Field
Previous Article in Journal
Role of the Membrane Transport Mechanism in Electrochemical Nitrogen Reduction Experiments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study for Recycling Water Treatment Membranes and Compnents towards a Circular Economy—Case of Macaronesia Area

1
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia e da Escola de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, University of Cape Verde, Praia CP 279, Cape Verde
2
Departamento de Ingeniería de Procesos, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
3
Departamento de Aguas, Instituto Tecnológico de Canarias, 35019 Santa Lucía, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2022, 12(10), 970; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12100970
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 19 September 2022 / Accepted: 29 September 2022 / Published: 2 October 2022

Abstract

:
Desalination is an opportunity to get fresh water for irrigation and for drinking. Reverse Osmosis (RO) for sea water desalination is a solution for the high demand for water in Atlantic islands. The most efficient process to get desalinated water is RO; however, it is necessary to study what to do with the RO membranes used at the end of their life. This paper confirms the possibility to recycle them. The main categories of recycling by thermal processing commonly used in the industry include incineration and pyrolysis to produce energy, gas and fuel. These processes can be applied to mixed plastic waste, such as the combination of materials used in the manufacture of RO membranes. Recycling RO elements from desalination plants is shown to be an opportunity and pioneering initiatives are already underway in Europe. Energy recovery, via incineration, is feasible nowadays and it is a possibility to recycle RO membranes. On the other hand, the recycling of RO elements, via the pyrolytic industry, for fuel production could be centralized in a new industry already planned in the Macaronesia area and all obsolete osmosis membranes could be sent there for recycling. Recycling RO membranes is a very important opportunity for the environment and economy of the zone. This is a new business in water treatments with membranes, very interesting for decreasing the residues and the carbon footprint. The importance of this work is applied to sea water membranes, brackish water ones, and also wastewater tertiaries RO elements at the end of their life.

1. Introduction

Water is a necessary resource for human activities, economic development and social welfare [1,2,3]. It is estimated that 50% of the world’s population will live in regions with a lack of water in 2025; hence the importance of proper water management and treatment [4]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), irrigation is the activity that consumes the freshest water in the world, which represents about 70% of all global water withdrawals [5]. When water resources are scarce, its use in agriculture is limited, so it is necessary to look for alternatives such as Reverse Osmosis (RO) desalination to obtain such water [6].
By means of RO, a solvent can be separated with high efficiency from the solutes it carries dissolved, obtaining permeates with a salt concentration in the order of 1–5% of the final concentration. Semi-permeable membranes, which selectively allow the solvent to pass through while retaining salts, are a key element in the process. Initially, they were made of cellulose acetate, but recently polyamide membranes have proven to be more efficient by facilitating control of pore size and permeability. In general, RO membranes are very poorly permeable to ions and electrostatically charged particles, while they show very little resistance to the passage of dissolved gases (oxygen, carbon dioxide, etc.) and to electrostatically uncharged molecules of low molecular weight. A key operating parameter of RO which can pose a threat is membrane fouling. This is due to causes such as salt precipitates present in the feed and which in the concentrate can exceed the solubility product, sediments formed by colloids and other suspended particles, and finally, the growth of micro-organisms on the membrane surface [2,3,4].
The membrane cleaning technique will depend on the type of membrane and the main cause of fouling. Thus, in general, periods of membrane rinsing, in which cleaning solutions are circulated at high speed over the membrane surface, are alternated with periods in which the membranes are immersed in cleaning solutions. A good cleaning program extends the life of the membranes [5,6,7,8].
These are usually:
  • To remove salt precipitates, an acid solution (hydrochloric, phosphoric or critical acid) and agents such as EDTA.
  • To remove sediments and organic compounds, alkaline solutions combined with surfactants.
  • To eliminate micro-organisms, chlorine solutions and chlorine derivatives to sterilize membranes.
This paper is related to recycling the RO membranes as a solution for these elements at the end of their life. Therefore, this study takes into account the circular economy [1,2,3].
The document studies the possibility to recycle the RO membranes. The main categories of recycling by thermal processing commonly used in the industry include incineration and pyrolysis to produce energy, gas and fuel. These processes can be applied to mixed plastic waste, such as the combination of materials used in the manufacture of RO membranes [6,7,8,9].
The recycling of RO elements from desalination plants is shown to be an opportunity and pioneering initiatives are already underway in Europe. Energy recovery, via incineration, is feasible but is not considered in line with the environmental, social, and political problems it may generate [10,11,12,13,14].
However, the recycling of RO membranes via the pyrolytic industry for fuel production can be centralized in a new industry already planned in the Macaronesia area and all obsolete osmosis membranes can be sent there. MITIMAC and Desal + projects promote the mitigation of climate change through innovation in the water cycle using low carbon technologies (www.mitimac.com, accessed on 9 August 2022) [10,15,16,17,18,19].
Recycling obsoleted RO elements is a very important opportunity for the environment and economy, decreasing the residues and the carbon footprint. The importance of this work could be extended to all water treatment membranes by RO (brackish water, sea water and wastewater elements) but also for NF or UF membranes at the end of their life [15].

2. Technical Actions to Be Carried Out

2.1. State-of-the-Art Recycling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes in Maccaronesia

Regarding membrane recycling in the Atlantic Islands, in the Canary Islands, there are 330 desalination plants in operation, concentrated on the islands of Gran Canaria, Tenerife, Fuerteventura and Lanzarote, where 291 desalination plants use RO technology (Table 1) [5,20,21,22,23,24].
A study of the number of elements in use and their replacement per year on these islands has been carried out. It is worth mentioning that the recycling of RO membranes does not exist in the Canary Islands. A German company that carries out this procedure recycles these membranes, but the transport costs must be considered, so it is more economical to take them directly to the landfill [6,25,26,27,28].
There are two types of procedures for recycling membranes: the first, mentioned above, is to reuse obsolete membranes in multi-stage plants that can be combined with membranes, putting the oldest membranes in the last stage or through the pyrolysis process [2,3,4,5].

2.1.1. Types of RO Membranes

Semi-permeable membranes selectively allow the solvent to pass through while retaining salts and are a key element in the process [3,4,5]. There are two types of RO membranes:
Cellulose acetate membranes: These are the first membranes to be made from this material. It has high permeability and selectivity of substances, is obtained at a low cost and the absorption of protein molecules is low. These membranes are considered ideal for filtration processes in aqueous solutions as well as in culture media and sera because they improve solvent flux and reject salts, making solutions more sterile.
This type of membrane is used for large flow rates. The more asymmetric the membrane, the better the solvent flux. It must be considered that bacteria can damage the membrane, so a pre-treatment with chlorine is necessary to avoid damage.
Polyamide membranes: These are made by combining two fused polymers on a fabric backing suitable for medium flow rates and perform better than cellulose acetate membranes by allowing control of pore size and permeability.
The advantages are that they have better thermal, chemical, and mechanical stability and are not affected by bacteria.
On the downside, they have low permeability and absorption problems. It must be considered that the pores of the filter membranes are very small and allow the passage of completely pure solute [3,4,5].

2.1.2. Membrane Materials

The membrane material must be stable over a wide pH and temperature range, moreover it should have good mechanical integrity, and the lifetime of the membrane depends on this.
The performance of the membrane (permeability, salt rejection) is intended to be stable over a period under conditions of use, which for current commercial membranes is 5 to 10 years [4,5,6].
There are two main groups of polymeric materials used to produce commercial RO membranes: cellulose acetate and polyamide, which are most supported by polysulphone. In Figure 1, the chemical structures of the cellulose acetate, aromatic polyamide and polysulfone are shown [4,5,6].
In the case of cellulose acetate membranes, they hydrolyze rapidly at extreme pH. Therefore, the operating pH range for this membrane is 6 to 8. However, it has sufficient tolerance to free chlorine to allow operation with chlorinated feed water, as well as in-line disinfection to control bacterial growth. On the other hand, polyamide composite membranes are stable over a wider pH range but are susceptible to oxidative degradation by free chlorine. Membranes made from polysulphone, on the other hand, have excellent chemical resistance, which allows long periods of operation and cleaning at high chlorine contents (200 mg/l), as well as a wide pH range (1–13) [4,5,6].
The membrane composition is shown in Figure 2, including the fiberglass housing which is involving the RO element; the membrane sheets made of aromatic polyamide, polysulfone and polyester; plastic permeate spacers separating both sides of the flat sheet membrane, altogether creating the membrane envelope; the plastic feed spacers between the membrane envelopes, the permeate tube made by PVC; plastics endcaps; and bonded parts [15].
In this paragraph, other information including chemical tolerance, membrane manufacturing method for testing, operating conditions, and performance of RO elements is shown.
The membrane type is cross-linked with fully aromatic polyamide composite. The test conditions of the manufacturing of these elements are the following:
Feed Water Pressure: 5.52 MPa;
Feed Water Temperature: 25 °C;
Feed Water Concentration: 32,000 mg/L NaCl;
Recovery Rate: 8%;
Feed Water pH: 7.
For more information, the minimum salt rejection for this type of RO membrane is approximately around 99.5%; and Boron rejection is about 95% at pH 8 (5 mg/L Boron added to Feed water) [1,15].
Regarding the operation limits of these RO elements, they are the following:
Maximum Operating Pressure: 8.3 MPa;
Maximum Feed Water Temperature: 45 °C;
Maximum Feed Water SDI15: 5;
Feed Water Chlorine Concentration: Not detectable;
Feed Water pH Range, Continuous Operation: 2–11;
Feed Water pH Range, Chemical Cleaning: 1–12;
Maximum Pressure Drop per Element: 0.10 MPa;
Maximum Pressure Drop per Vessel: 0.34 MPa.
Moreover, for more information, all the RO elements are wet tested, treated with a tested feed water solution, and then vacuum packed in oxygen barrier bags with deoxidant inside. To prevent biological growth during system shutdown, it is recommended to perform 30–60 min flushing of RO elements with feed or permeate water once every two days [1].
The presence of free chlorine and other oxidizing agents under certain conditions, such as heavy metals which act as an oxidation catalyst in the feed water will cause unexpected oxidation of the membrane. It is strongly recommended to remove these oxidizing agents contained in feed water before operating the RO system [1,15].

2.1.3. Recycling of RO Membranes

Recycling consists of converting waste into new products or raw materials for subsequent use rather than disposal. In the Canary Islands, there is a high production of membrane waste that ends up in landfill sites and which represents a very high cost, so these elements can give a second life. For example, brackish water RO membranes can be given a new life in other plants which do not need a high permeate quality. However, this water use would only be for irrigation or for return to the sea because the water from the WWTP to the tertiary is very dirty compared to the water from a brackish well installation [2,3,4,5,6].
For the recycling of the membranes, the best membranes will be chosen with a chemical cleaning procedure in order to be able to reuse them in the treatment plant, thus extending their useful life. However, in multi-stage plants, membranes can be combined with membranes, placing the oldest membranes in the last stage, thus precipitating the salts earlier and using them to produce products with these salts [2,3,4,5,6].
The advantages that we can find in terms of recycling is that we will be favoring the elimination of membrane waste, so we will avoid a high cost, as each membrane is around 500 euros, so if the membrane has a useful life of 5–7 years, this means an annual amortization cost of 100 euros for each membrane out of a total of 49,500 membranes operating in the Canary Islands [2,3,4,5,6].
As for the disadvantages, we can find membranes that have high fouling and cannot be reused, for this, a pre-treatment is required prior to the membranes to avoid clogging with solids or precipitates [2,3,4].
Another disadvantage is that the desired performance would not be obtained and could be affected due to the use of used membranes, as they would not have the same efficiency as a new one [2,3,4].
The RO composite membrane sheet is usually constructed with a thin dense layer of polyamide, supported by an inner layer of microporous polysulphone (PSf) and a non-woven polyester [2,3,4,5,6].
The large quantity of obsoleted RO membranes from desalination of the Macaronesia area is really a global problem for the Atlantic islands as we do not know what to do with them and it is a problem for the environment in small islands and extensions. However, the recycling of RO membranes is a social opportunity for the environment and financial issues too, in the Macaronesia area, Spain and in Europe. In fact, in Germany, there is a company that is recycling membranes with a price of around 250 EUR per 10 elements recycled, which is very interesting for the circular economy and society. Moreover, the recycling process of RO membranes and the pyrolytic industry are technically viable and potential opportunities in the actual industry of the recycling market [2,3,4,5,6].
Recycling RO membranes offers technical and economic advantages. The main results of this project will help minimize environmental impacts by increasing the life cycle of the membrane elements through secondary use or reuse of materials and, therefore, reduce the carbon footprint and further improve the sustainability of the technology [2,3,4].

2.1.4. Pyrolysis Process

Pyrolysis is the chemical decomposition of organic matter and all types of materials (except metals and glass) caused by heating at high temperatures in the absence of oxygen. In this pyrolysis process, residue of liquid, gas and a solid residue are obtained. Gaseous and liquid waste could be utilized by combustion through a steam cycle to produce electrical energy. Solid waste can be used as fuel in industrial installations [6,7,8].
In order to carry out the energy assessment, it is necessary to eliminate glass fiber encapsulation that provides the membrane [image 1.2], the only disadvantage being the other elements due to the difficulty in separating them because they are mixed together, being plastic membranes. Although, with pyrolysis being the thermal treatment, mixing several types of plastics, we can finally obtain fuels with high calorific value as by-products of these elements [6,7,8].
Now, the disadvantage is that there is no incinerator in the Canary Islands, but Tenerife has launched a project called “Plastics Energy”, where all the RO elements for this process could be sent, in case it is not carried out, this project could be centralized in any other island for the same purpose. These are the parts of the RO membranes to be used in the pyrolysis process as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 below.
The different components of the RO membranes and their characteristics, shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, are the following. In the flat sheet membranes, we found the aromatic polyamide material, a polysulphone layer and polyester. Moreover, the polypropylene feed spacer is in between the flat sheet membranes, mixed with glue. Finally, it is made of ABS or noryl materials, such as the end caps and permeate tubes.

2.1.5. Other Options for Disposal

In terms of options for disposal, other strategies may be considered in the future. For example, sheets and spacers have previously been recycled as geotextiles in home gardens under a layer of gravel to maintain the position of decorative rocks and eliminate weed growth [5]. In addition, potential agricultural applications for spacers have also been proposed, including bird netting, windbreaks, or turf protection netting [2,3,4,5,6].

3. Results and Discussions

In the investigation, we found around 50,000 RO membranes in operation in Macaronesia territories and a partial replacement per year of about 10,000 membranes, around 20% of all [13,17,27].
In our estimation, in the Atlantic islands, the membranes are used for at least 5 years, being that the standard warranty per element by the manufacturer is 3 years. Usually, obsoleted membranes go to landfills for burying. For more information, you can find the below documentation used for this study about the SWRO plants database of the Canary Islands. This is shown in Table 2 and Figure 7 and Figure 8 [28,29,30,31,32].
Regarding the total permeate flow in the Macaronesia area, estimated at 687,000 m3/d. In Table 3, the number of elements used per year, partial replacement per year, their weight and volume are shown [13,17,27,32].
In the process of incineration, the encapsulated glass fiber should be eliminated from the elements. This is not complicated to do. Other parts of the membranes are difficult to eliminate because they are mixed with glue and plastic elements; however, we can incinerate them to produce energy [28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
In the Macaronesia area, the incinerator could be centralized on one island, and all the obsoleted RO elements could be sent there. On Tenerife island, there is a pyrolytic where the RO membranes can be treated in this way [32,35].
This pyrolytic industry is working in between 300 °C and 800 °C. It is obtained in the waste from this process recycled components such as liquid and solid residues, and the following gases: CH4, H2, CO2 and CO [27,32,36].
Next, the financial-economic plan is described to evaluate the economic viability of the results of this study.
RO membrane recycling does not exist in the Canary Islands and Macaronesia area; however, the German company MEMRE is doing it, and it has a cost of 25 Euros per reverse osmosis membrane plus transport. Therefore, it is possible to also do it in the Atlantic islands [32,37].
In the Canary Islands, at this time, between 20 and 30 Euros are paid plus transport to take the reverse osmosis elements to a landfill to bury them without any treatment, in a similar way in all the islands. In other autonomous communities, it is also taxed, for example, in Alicante the reverse osmosis membranes are evacuated from the plant as normal urban solid waste (RSU) removal and have a cost of 45 Euros/Tm in management plus taxes, in addition, they have to add transportation. Energy recovery or fuel production through pyrolysis are two recycling options that would avoid these segregation costs [13,17,27,38,39,40].
An estimated economic analysis has been studied for the operating account of the new potential recycling business of reverse osmosis membranes and their components, also for a period of 5 years, to recycle them in other processes such as incineration or pyrolysis. The initial business cost has been estimated at around EUR 80,000 to have the necessary facilities to be able to manage the recycling of the membranes, that is, office, staff, etc., since it is not intended to build an incinerator or a pyrolytic industry in this case but to take advantage of the synergies that may arise with the future projected pyrolytic industry in Tenerife “Plastics Energy” [32,40].
In the same way, personnel expenses (salaries) have been increased annually with an estimate of 3% of the CPI, amortizations over a time horizon of a minimum of 20 years of duration of the activity, the initial number of membranes as studied in part of 10,000 obsolete elements generated annually and it is estimated that each one of them can be received at least 10 EUR, which is what has been considered in the calculations [27,32,39].
Finally, the following estimate is obtained, reaching an internal rate of return of 73%, which, taking into account that the current interests of the European Bank are 0% and that we would also save the cost of taking the obsolete membranes to the landfill or to the Competent authorized manager according to the autonomous community where we are located is also a viable business opportunity both technically and economically and very interesting in the market. You can find this information in the following Table 4 [39,40].
This economic analysis justifies the recycling of the obsoleted RO elements and obtained an interest rate of 73%, which is very high and interesting for any business. Therefore, companies such as Plastics Energy are introduced in this market. Due to the good economic results of the study this organization is constructing a pyrolytic industry in Tenerife Island, the biggest one in the Macaronesia area to centralize all this business in the zone [15,32].
The recovery of plastics, both material and energy, is going to be vital in the near future and, given that the Administration is focused on waste of domestic and commercial origin, it will be up to the private sector to take the initiative, and try together with the Administration that there is no unfair competition by dumping waste of this type, since it is currently much cheaper to do so and the implementation of other more environmentally sustainable technologies will not be favored if it is not promoted, which is why a very interesting line emerges in this sense and it is possible to create a project for the development of this route [15,32].
Moreover, in Appendix A, more information on the fixed, variable and personnel costs of a typical desalination plant of 50,000 m3/d according to the FCCA and which has been taken as a reference for this study is shown.

4. Conclusions

The recycling of RO membranes is a very important opportunity for the environment and economy, specifically in the Macaronesia area, as shown in Table 2 of the economic analysis performed to justify these conclusions.
Recycling obsoleted RO elements in desalination is a new business in water treatments with membranes. It is very interesting for the environment, decreasing the residues and the carbon footprint. In fact, the importance of this work is applied to sea water membranes, brackish water ones, and also wastewater tertiaries RO elements at the end of their life.
The main categories of recycling by thermal processing commonly used in the industry include incineration and pyrolysis to produce energy, gas and fuel.
One of the recycling processes is pyrolysis. In this process, energy and recycled components are obtained from the old RO elements of the desalination plants. This could be applicable in the Atlantic Islands which have a high number of desalination plants per surface.
On the other hand, incineration is also an interesting process to consider for recycling the obsoleted membranes to produce energy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.T. and F.L.; methodology, B.P. and A.R.-M.; software, A.R.-M.; validation, J.V., T.T. and F.L.; formal analysis, B.P.; investigation, T.T.; resources, A.R.-M.; data curation, J.V.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L.; writing—review and editing, B.P.; visualization, J.V.; supervision, A.R.-M.; project administration, F.L.; funding acquisition, A.R.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was co-funded by the INTERREG V-A Cooperation, Spain-Portugal MAC (Madeira-Azores-Canarias) 2014–2020 program and the MITIMAC project (MAC2/1.1a/263).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Staff€/year€/year€/m3
1 Plant Manager50,485.01
1 Administrative22,357.65
1 Maintenance Manager36,781.94
2 Mechanical Maintenance 55,894.12
2 Electric Maintenance55,894.12
5 Operators139,194.40
Total staff 360,607.240.0203
FIXED COSTS
(a) Exploitation
Laboratories9255.58
Sampling consumables1320
Stationery3970
Phone and mail6611.13
Clothing and work clothes3331
Security expenses2640
Civil liability insurance (multi-risk)13,222.26
Rent a car4960
Total exploitation 45,309.970.0025
(b) Maintenance
Mechanic19,833.39
Electric9916.69
Oils and fats30,300.00
Workshop spare parts26,400.00
Various repairs15,000.00
Potable water1000
High voltage network maintenance1320
Third party contracts79,333.59
Training5000
Total maintenance 188,103.670.0106
(c) Conservation
Paintings4630
Gardening6611.13
Cleaning1980
Masonry1320
Miscellaneous (security, pest control, etc.)14,544.49
Total conservation 29,085.620.0016
TOTAL FIXED COSTS (a + b + c) + STAFF623,106.500.0358%
VARIABLE COSTS
(d) Pretreatment reactives
Coagulant595,001.98
Polyelectrolyte165,278.32
Sodium hypochlorite330,556.65
Sodium bisulfite0.00
Anti-scalant231,389.66
Sulfuric acid0.00
Total pretratment reactives 1,322,226.610.0743
(e) Post-treatment reactives
Sodium hypochlorite0.00
Calcite (25 g/m3 at 60 €/ton)6,700.00
CO2 (10 g CO2/m3 a 0.6 €/kg incl. rent + replace)106,800.00
Total post-treatment reactives 133,500.000.0075
(f) Membrane cleaning33,055.6733,055.670.0019
(g) Cartridge replacement (15,000 cart. × 15 €/cart.)247,500.00247,500.000.0139
(h) Membrane replacement (10% at 700 €/unit)1,884,9601,884,9600.1059
TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS (d + e + f + g + h)3,621,242.300.203447%
FIXED COSTS + STAFF + VARIABLES COSTS 0.238455%
GENERAL EXPENSES + INDUSTRIAL PROFIT 0.045310%
EXPLOITATION COSTS 0.283865%
ENERGY (3.1 kW/h m3 at 0.049 €/kW/h)2,703,820.000.151935%
Remarks:
The costs of chemical products can vary considerably depending on the type of installation and water intake, especially the anti-fouling item (−40%).
Sulfuric acid is increasingly being removed from pretreatments.
Replacement costs for cartridge filters will depend (± 15%) on the maintenance program in each case.
Membrane washing and replacement can also fluctuate (± 20%) depending on the behavior of the pretreatment system.
Membrane replacement costs will depend (± 15%) on the type of membranes and the maintenance program
The energy consumption corresponds to the new plant design and includes small pumps to the plant and from the plant to the supply tanks.
The price of energy will depend on the corresponding agreements.

References

  1. Kurihara, M. Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination. Membranes 2021, 11, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ruiz-García, A.; Melián-Martel, N.; Nuez, I. Short Review on Predicting Fouling in RO Desalination. Membranes 2017, 7, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Jorge, S.; Patricia, T.; Carlos, M. Reúso de aguas residuales domésticas en agricultura. Una revisión. Rev. Agron. Colomb. 2008, 26, 347–359. [Google Scholar]
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater. In Volume II: Wastewater Use in Agricultura; WHO: Paris, France, 2006; 222p. [Google Scholar]
  5. WHO. “World Health Organization—Water”, Fact Sheet 391. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs391/en/2014 (accessed on 5 August 2014).
  6. Quist-Jensen, C.A.; Macedonio, F.; Drioli, E. Membrane technology for water production in agricultura: Desalination and wastewater reuse. Desalination 2015, 364, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Francisco, J.; García, L.; Sebastián, O.; Pérez, B.; Antonio, G.G. Energy performance of a RO desalination plant operating with variable pressure and flow. Desalination 2015, 366, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kheriji, J.; Mnif, A.; Bejaoui, I.; Hamrouni, B. Study of the influence of operating parameters on boron removal by a RO membrane. Desalination Water Treat. 2015, 56, 2653–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schallenberg-Rodríguez, J.; Veza, J.M.; Blanco-Marigorta, A. Energy efficiency and desalination in Cape Verde. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 40, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zerpa, F.L.; Pérez, A.R. Low-Cost Continuous Measurement System to Determine the Relationship between the Electrical Conductivity “Ec” and the Temperature “T” in Brackish Waters. DYNA 2021, 96, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Joaquín, B.M.; Valenti, J.V. Geografía De España; Ariel: Barcelona, Spain, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  12. Available online: https://administracion.gob.es/pag_Home/espanaAdmon/comoSeOrganizaEstado/ComunidadesAutonomas.html (accessed on 31 May 2021).
  13. Guillermo, M.M. Las Islas Canarias ¿Una Región Aislada?” 2001, Boletín de la A.G.E. N.32: 155. Available online: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/13217 (accessed on 31 May 2021).
  14. Parlamento Europeo. Tratado De Funcionamiento De La Unión Europea (TFUE). Artículos 349 Y 355; Las Regiones Ultraperiféricas (Rup); Fichas Técnicas Sobre La Unión Europea; Parlamento Europeo: Strasbourg, France, 2016.
  15. Zerpa, F.L.; Suarez, B.P.; Filgueira, F.J.R.; Vaswani, J. Reuse of Reverse Osmosis Elements of the Desalination Processes. DYNA 2021, 96, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Demografía y Población, Estadísticas de Nacimientos, Muertes Fetales y Neonatales. 2019. Available online: http://www.ine.es (accessed on 15 July 2019).
  17. Gamero, B.D.R. Mitigación del Cambio Climático en el Ciclo Integral del Agua: Aplicación al Proceso de Trata-Miento de Aguas Residuales. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Las palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. Veza, J.M.; Rodriguez-GonzalezJuan, J. Second use for old RO membranes: Wastewater treatment. Desalination 2003, 157, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Basterrechea, J.M. Planificación y gestión del agua. DYNA 2000, 75, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dow, N.; Gray, S.; Li, J.-D.; Zhang, J.; Ostarcevic, E.; Liubinas, A.; Atherton, P.; Roeszler, G.; Gibbs, A.; Duke, M. Pilot trial of membrane distillation driven by low grade waste heat: Membrane fouling and energy assessment. Desalination 2016, 391, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mazlan, N.M.; Peshev, D.; Livingston, A.G. Energy consumption for desalination—A comparison of forward osmosis with RO, and the potential for perfect membranes. Desalination 2016, 377, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lawler, W.; Bradford-Hartke, Z.; Cran, M.J.; Duke, M.; Leslie, G.; Ladewig, B.P.; Le-Clech, P. Towards new opportunities for reuse, recycling and disposal of used RO membranes. Desalination 2012, 299, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodriguez, J.J.; Jimenez, V.; Trujillo, O.; Veza, J.M. Reuse of RO membranes as a filtration stage in advanced wastewater treatment. Desalination 2002, 150, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Govardhan, B.; Fatima, S.; Madhumala, M.; Sridhar, S. Modification of used commercial reverse osmosis membranes to nanofiltration modules for the production of mineral-rich packaged drinking water. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, J.; Chang, V.W.C.; Fane, A.G. Environmental life cycle assessment of brackish water RO de-salination for different electricity production models. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 4, 2267–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Reboso, J.V.; Toyos, F.N.; Rámirez, J.S.; Suárez, B.P. Application of reverse osmosis to the regeneration of wastewater in the southeast of the Island of Gran Canaria (Spain). Desalination Water Treat. 2020, 208, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Garcia, R. Nanofiltration and Ultrafiltration Membranes from End-of-Life RO Membranes. A Study of Recycling. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Alcalá de Henares, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  28. Patel, S.K.; Ritt, C.L.; Deshmukh, A.; Wang, Z.; Qin, M.; Epsztein, R.; Elimelech, M. The relative insignificance of advanced materials in enhancing the energy efficiency of desalination technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 1694–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jafari, M.; Vanoppen, M.; van Agtmaal, J.M.C.; Cornelissen, E.R.; Vrouwenvelder, J.S.; Verliefde, A.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Picioreanu, C. Cost of founling in full-scale reverse osmosis nanofiltration installations in the Netherlands. Desalination 2021, 500, 114865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Altmann, T.; Das, R. Process improvement of sea water reverse osmosis (SWRO) and subsequent decarbonization. Desalination 2021, 499, 114791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tavares, T.; Tavares, J.; León-Zerpa, F.A.; Peñate-Suárez, B.; Ramos-Martín, A. Assessment of Processes to Increase the Useful Life and the Reuse of Reverse Osmosis Elements in Cape Verde and Macaronesia. Membranes 2022, 12, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Souza-Chaves, B.M.; Alhussaini, M.A.; Felix, V.; Presson, L.K.; Betancourt, W.Q.; Hickenbottom, K.L.; Achilli, A. Extending the life of water reuse reverse osmosis membranes using chlorination. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 642, 119897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Senán-Salinas, J.; Landaburu-Aguirre, J.; Contreras-Martinez, J.; García-Calvo, E. Life Cycle Assessment application for emerging membrane recycling technologies: From reverse osmosis into forward osmosis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 179, 106075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moreira, V.R.; Lebron, Y.A.R.; de Paula, E.C.; Santos, L.V.D.S.; Amaral, M.C.S. Recycled reverse osmosis membrane combined with pre-oxidation for improved arsenic removal from high turbidity waters and retrofit of conventional drinking water treatment process. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Koo, C.H.; Mohammad, A.W.; Suja’, F. Recycling of oleochemical wastewater for boiler feed water using reverse osmosis membranes—A case study. Desalination 2011, 271, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Contreras-Martínez, J.; García-Payo, C.; Arribas, P.; Rodríguez-Sáez, L.; Lejarazu-Larrañaga, A.; García-Calvo, E.; Khayet, M. Recycled reverse osmosis membranes for forward osmosis technology. Desalination 2021, 519, 115312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mejía, H.F.G.; Toledo-Alarcón, J.; Rodriguez, B.; Cifuentes, J.R.; Porré, F.O.; Haeger, M.P.L.; Ovalle, N.V.; Astudillo, C.L.; García, A. Direct recycling of discarded reverse osmosis membranes for domestic wastewater treatment with a focus on water reuse. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 184, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. de Paula, E.C.; Amaral, M.C.S. Environmental and economic evaluation of end-of-life reverse osmosis membranes recycling by means of chemical conversion. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 194, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. López-Ramírez, J.A.; Oviedo, M.D.C.; Alonso, J.Q. Comparative studies of reverse osmosis membranes for wastewater reclamation. Desalination 2006, 191, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Farré, M.J.; Keller, J.; Holling, N.; Poussade, Y.; Gernjak, W. Occurrence of N-nitrosodimethylamine precursors in wastewater treatment plant effluent and their fate during ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis membrane treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of: (a) Cellulose acetate; (b) Polyamide; (c) Polysulfone. Source: self-made.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of: (a) Cellulose acetate; (b) Polyamide; (c) Polysulfone. Source: self-made.
Membranes 12 00970 g001
Figure 2. Membrane composition. Source: self-made.
Figure 2. Membrane composition. Source: self-made.
Membranes 12 00970 g002
Figure 3. RO Membranes. Source: self-made.
Figure 3. RO Membranes. Source: self-made.
Membranes 12 00970 g003
Figure 4. Name of the components of the I.O.M. Source: self-made.
Figure 4. Name of the components of the I.O.M. Source: self-made.
Membranes 12 00970 g004
Figure 5. Flat sheet membrane section [1].
Figure 5. Flat sheet membrane section [1].
Membranes 12 00970 g005
Figure 6. RO element section [1].
Figure 6. RO element section [1].
Membranes 12 00970 g006
Figure 7. Most significant sea water desalination plants (2019) [15,32]. Source: self-made.
Figure 7. Most significant sea water desalination plants (2019) [15,32]. Source: self-made.
Membranes 12 00970 g007
Figure 8. Most significant sea water desalination plants in the Canary Islands (Spain) (2019) [15,32]. Source: self-made.
Figure 8. Most significant sea water desalination plants in the Canary Islands (Spain) (2019) [15,32]. Source: self-made.
Membranes 12 00970 g008
Table 1. Number of membranes and replacement per year. Source: self-made.
Table 1. Number of membranes and replacement per year. Source: self-made.
IslandNº. of Elements/Year UsedElement Replacement/Year
Gran Canaria235004700
Tenerife93501870
Fuerteventura86501730
Lanzarote80001600
Table 2. SWRO Plants in Canary Islands [15,32]. Source: self-made.
Table 2. SWRO Plants in Canary Islands [15,32]. Source: self-made.
Name of the PlantProduction (m3/d)Consume (kWh/m3)IslandHabitants per Plant
Cercado de Don Andrés2003.5LanzaroteIrrigation
Lanzarote III 110,0003.5Lanzarote10541
Lanzarote III 250003.5Lanzarote5271
Lanzarote III 350003.5Lanzarote5271
Lanzarote IV20,0003.5Lanzarote21083
Lanzarote V18,0002.4Lanzarote18975
Aeropuerto7003.04Lanzarote18327
Agua Park303.04Lanzarote500
Apartamentos Ficus603.5Lanzarote120
Apartamentos Puerto Tahiche1503.5Lanzarote300
Apartamentos Trebol803.5Lanzarote160
Ercros25003.5Lanzarote11057
Ercros22003.5Lanzarote9731
Famara3503.5Lanzarote700
Hotel Golf y Mar903.5Lanzarote180
Hotel Gran Meliá Salinas4002.61Lanzarote800
Hotel Playa Verde2503.5Lanzarote500
Hotel Teguise Playa2503.5Lanzarote500
La Galea1503.04Lanzarote300
Lanzarote Beach Club II703.04Lanzarote140
Las Arenas. Costa Teguise803.04Lanzarote160
Playa Roca2503.04Lanzarote500
Apartamentos Don Paco Castilla3202.61Lanzarote640
Apartamentos Sol Lanzarote3502.61Lanzarote700
Cdad Apartamentos CAMP 2.61LanzaroteTourism
Holiday Land S.A.30003.5Lanzarote6000
Hotel Fariones Playa5003.5Lanzarote1000
Hotel Playa Azul3003.5Lanzarote600
Hoteles Canarios S.A. 3.5LanzaroteTourism
Iberhotel 3.5LanzaroteTourism
Zorilla403.04Lanzarote80
Hotel Jameos Playa3362.61Lanzarote672
La Santa Sport I2503.5Lanzarote500
La Santa Sport II2503.5Lanzarote500
Ria La Santa4003.5Lanzarote800
Apartamentos Son Boy Family Suites5003.04Lanzarote1000
Bungalows Atlantic Gardens 3.5LanzaroteTourism
Costa los Limones S.A.3503.5Lanzarote700
Hotel Corbeta 3.5LanzaroteTourism
Hotel Costa Calero3243.04Lanzarote642
Marina Rubicón3003.04Lanzarote600
Hotel Paradise Island3003.04Lanzarote600
Hotel Princesa Yaiza5003.04Lanzarote1000
Hotel Rubicón Palace4503.04Lanzarote900
Inalsa Sur 16003.5Lanzarote1859
Inalsa Sur 212003.5Lanzarote3718
Inalsa Sur 330003.5Lanzarote9294
Janubio 3.04LanzaroteTourism
Lanzasur Club2003.04Lanzarote400
Playa Blanca S.A. 3.5LanzaroteTourism
Club Lanzarote45003.5Lanzarote9000
Apartamentos Moromar2503.5Lanzarote500
Gea Fonds Numero Uno Lanzarote S.A.3.5LanzaroteTourism
Grupo Rosa10003.5Lanzarote2000
Hipotels3003.5Lanzarote600
Hotel Corona3003.5Lanzarote600
Hotel Costa Calero S.L.3003.04Lanzarote600
Hotel Sunbou5003.04Lanzarote1000
Isla Lobos1003.04Lanzarote200
Leas Hotel S.A. 3.5LanzaroteTourism
Niels Prahm 3.5LanzaroteTourism
Occidental Hotel Oasis2503.04Lanzarote500
Playa Flamingo2003.04Lanzarote400
Tjaereborg Timesharing. S.A.5003.04Lanzarote1000
Empresa Mixta de Aguas de Antigua. S.L.48003.04Fuerteventura11948
Grupo Turístico Barceló. S.L.2403.5Fuerteventura480
Aguas Cristóbal Franquis. S.L.12003.5Fuerteventura2400
Anjoca Canarias. S.A.30003.5Fuerteventura6000
Ramiterra. S.L.30003.04Fuerteventura6000
Inver Canary Dos. S.L.3003.04Fuerteventura600
Suministros de Agua de La Oliva. S.A.90003.04Fuerteventura17920
Consorcio Abastecimiento de Aguas a Fuerteventura40003.04Fuerteventura7964
Parque de Ocio y Cultura (BAKU) 13003.04Fuerteventura600
Parque de Ocio y Cultura (BAKU) 2903.04Fuerteventura180
RIU Palace Tres Islas1003.5Fuerteventura200
RIU Oliva Beach4003.5Fuerteventura800
Nombredo. S.L.5003.5Fuerteventura1000
Consorcio Abastecimiento de Aguas a Fuerteventura44003.5Fuerteventura20539
Puertito de la Cruz603.5Fuerteventura120
Vinamar. S.A.36003.5Fuerteventura7200
Fuercan. S.L. Cañada del Rio I20003.5Fuerteventura4000
Fuercan. S.L. Cañada del Rio II10003.04Fuerteventura2000
Fuercan. S.L. Cañada del Rio III20003.04Fuerteventura4000
Club Aldiana2003.5Fuerteventura400
Erwin Sick303.5Fuerteventura60
Esquinzo Urbanización II12003.5Fuerteventura2400
Esquinzo Urbanización III12003.5Fuerteventura2400
Hotel Sol Élite Los Gorriones 14003.5Fuerteventura800
Hotel Sol Élite Los Gorriones 24003.5Fuerteventura800
Stella Canaris I3003.5Fuerteventura600
Stella Canaris II3003.5Fuerteventura600
Stella Canaris III2503.5Fuerteventura500
Hotel H 10 Playa Esmeralda.2503.5Fuerteventura500
Hotel “Club Paraíso Playa”3003.5Fuerteventura600
Urbanización Costa Calma.1103.5Fuerteventura220
Urbanización Tierra Dorada.1203.5Fuerteventura240
Zoo-Parque La Lajita.13003.5Fuerteventura500
Apartamentos Esmeralda Maris1203.5Fuerteventura240
Hotel H10 Tindaya2803.5Fuerteventura560
Aparthotels Morasol803.5Fuerteventura160
Consorcio Abastecimiento de Aguas a Fuerteventura36,5003.5Fuerteventura39382
Aeropuerto5003.5Fuerteventura15439
GranTarajal40003.5Fuerteventura14791
Sotavento. S.A.29253.5Fuerteventura5850
Arucas-Moya I10,0003.5Gran Canaria45419
Granja experimental5003.5Gran CanariaIrrigation
Granja experimental5003.5Gran CanariaIrrigation
Comunidad Fuentes de Quintanilla8003.04Gran CanariaIrrigation
Granja experimental5003.5Gran CanariaIrrigation
Gáldar-Agaete I30003.5Gran Canaria16199
Gáldar II70003.04Gran Canaria37799
Agragua15,0003.5Gran CanariaIrrigation
Guía I50003.5Gran Canaria6962
Guía II50002.61Gran Canaria6962
Félix Santiago Melián50002.61Gran CanariaIrrigation
Las Palmas III65,0003.5Gran Canaria307545
Las Palmas IV15,0002.61Gran Canaria70972
BAXTER S.A.1003.5Gran Canaria200
El Corte Inglés. S.A.3003.5Gran Canaria3000
Anfi del Mar I2503.5Gran Canaria500
Anfi del Mar II2503.5Gran Canaria500
AQUALING20003.04Gran Canaria4000
Puerto Rico40003.04Gran Canaria8000
Puerto Rico I40003.04Gran Canaria8000
Hotel Taurito4003.04Gran Canaria800
Hotel Costa Meloneras3003.04Gran Canaria600
Hotel Villa del Conde5003.04Gran Canaria1000
Bahia Feliz6003.5Gran Canaria1200
Bonny80003.5Gran CanariaIrrigation
Maspalomas I Mar14,5003.5Gran Canaria19572
Maspalomas II25,2003.04Gran Canaria34016
UNELCO II6003.5Gran CanariaIndustrial
Ayto. San Nicolas50003.04Gran Canaria7608
Asociación de agricultores de la Aldea54003.04Gran CanariaIrrigation
Sureste III80003.5Gran Canaria133846
Aeropuerto I10003.5Gran Canaria24791
Salinetas16,0003.5Gran Canaria102424
Aeropuerto II5003.5Gran Canaria12396
Hoya León15003.5Gran CanariaIrrigation
Bco. García Ruiz10003.5Gran CanariaIrrigation
Mando Aéreo de Canarias10003.5Gran Canaria3000
UNELCO I10003.5Gran CanariaIndustrial
Anfi del Mar15003.04Gran Canaria3000
Norcrost. S.A.1703.04Gran Canaria340
Adeje Arona30,0003.04Tenerife126728
Gran Hotel Anthelia Park 3.04TenerifeTourism
La Caleta (Ayto. Adeje)10,0003.04Tenerife20000
UTE Tenerife Oeste14,0002.16Tenerife40000
Hotel Sheraton La Caleta 3.04TenerifeTourism
Hotel Gran Tacande 3.04TenerifeTourism
Hotel Rocas de Nivaria. Playa Paraíso3.04TenerifeTourism
Hotel Bahía del Duque. Costa Adeje3.04TenerifeTourism
Siam Park 3.04TenerifeTourism
Tenerife-Sol S. A. 3.04TenerifeTourism
Hotel Conquistador. P. de Las Américas3.04TenerifeTourism
Arona Gran Hotel. Los Cristianos 3.04TenerifeTourism
Bonny S.A. Finca El Fraile. 3.04TenerifeTourism
El Toscal. La Estrella (C. Regantes Las Galletas)3.04TenerifeTourism
Complejo Mare Nostrum. P. Las Américas3.04TenerifeTourism
Hotel Villa Cortés 3.04TenerifeTourism
Buenavista Golf S.A. 3.04TenerifeTourism
Rural Teno 3.04TenerifeAgrícola
Ropa Rent. S.A. (P.I. Güímar) 3.04TenerifeIndustrial
Unelco6003.5TenerifeIndustrial
I.T.E.R. Cabildo de Tenerife143.5TenerifeIndustrial
C.T. en P.I. de Granadilla 3.5TenerifeIndustrial
Bonny S.A. Finca El Confital. 3.5TenerifeIrrigation
Polígono Industrial de Granadilla (portátil)3.5TenerifeIndustrial
UTE Desalinizadora de Granadilla14,0003.04Tenerife50146
Guia de ISORA Hoya de la leña 3.5TenerifeTourism
Club Campo Guía de Isora. Abama3.5TenerifeTourism
Hotel Meliá Palacio de Isora. Alcalá.3.5TenerifeTourism
Loro Parque 3.5TenerifeTourism
Santa Cruz I20,0003.04Tenerife204856
Recinto Portuario Santa Cruz (portátil)3.04TenerifeIndustrial
CEPSA10003.04TenerifeIndustrial
Hotel Playa la Arena 3.04TenerifeTourism
Hotel Jardín Tecina20003.04La Gomera4000
La Restinga5003.5El Hierro297
La Restinga12003.04El Hierro712
El Cangrejo12003.04El Hierro2478
El Cangrejo12003.04El Hierro2478
El Golfo13503.04El Hierro4093
Table 3. Number of elements used, replacement, weight and volume [15,32]. Source: self-made.
Table 3. Number of elements used, replacement, weight and volume [15,32]. Source: self-made.
Macaronesia
Islands
Number of Elements Used per YearPartial Replacement per YearWeight (kg)Volume (m3)
Lanzarote
(Canary
Islands)
8000160032,00067
Fuerteventura (Canary Islands)8650173034,60073
Gran Canaria (Canary Islands)23,500470094,000197
Tenerife
(Canary Islands)
9350187037,40079
El Hierro
(Canary Islands)
3507014003
La Gomera
(Canary Islands)
150306001
Porto Santo (Madeira)450459002
Praia-Palmarejo
(Cape Verde)
70010020004
St Vincent (Cape Verde)3505010002
Salt (Cape Verde)3505010002
Table 4. Economic analysis of RO membrane recycling study in EUR [15,32]. Source: self-made.
Table 4. Economic analysis of RO membrane recycling study in EUR [15,32]. Source: self-made.
TRADING ACCOUNTYEAR 0YEAR 1YEAR 2 YEAR 3YEAR 4 YEAR 5
Bills 500300300350350
Variation of existences 00000
Shopping 50003000300035003500
External services 1000500500600600
Personal expenses 30,00030,90031,82732,78233,765
Amortization 40004000400040004000
Financial expenses 100100100120120
Other expenses 350250200200200
Total 40,95039,05039,92741,55242,535
Income 100,000100,000100,500121,200121,800
Variation of existences 0050100150
Sales (obsolete membranes) 10,00010,00010,05010,10010,150
Other operating income 00000
Other income 00000
Financial income 00000
Total−80,00059,05060,95060,57379,64879,265
Internal Rate of Returns (IRR) 73%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tavares, T.; Leon, F.; Vaswani, J.; Peñate, B.; Ramos-Martín, A. Study for Recycling Water Treatment Membranes and Compnents towards a Circular Economy—Case of Macaronesia Area. Membranes 2022, 12, 970. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12100970

AMA Style

Tavares T, Leon F, Vaswani J, Peñate B, Ramos-Martín A. Study for Recycling Water Treatment Membranes and Compnents towards a Circular Economy—Case of Macaronesia Area. Membranes. 2022; 12(10):970. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12100970

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tavares, Tomás, Federico Leon, Jenifer Vaswani, Baltasar Peñate, and Alejandro Ramos-Martín. 2022. "Study for Recycling Water Treatment Membranes and Compnents towards a Circular Economy—Case of Macaronesia Area" Membranes 12, no. 10: 970. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12100970

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop