Next Article in Journal
Pleurocidin Peptide Enhances Grouper Anti-Vibrio harveyi Immunity Elicited by Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-Encapsulated Recombinant Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase
Next Article in Special Issue
Immunotherapy with an HIV-DNA Vaccine in Children and Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Immune Adjuvant Effect of Molecularly-defined Toll-Like Receptor Ligands
Previous Article in Special Issue
Co-Administration of Molecular Adjuvants Expressing NF-Kappa B Subunit p65/RelA or Type-1 Transactivator T-bet Enhance Antigen Specific DNA Vaccine-Induced Immunity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 2
Issue 2
10.3390/vaccines2020354
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

HIV DNA Vaccine: Stepwise Improvements Make a Difference

by
Barbara K. Felber
1,*,
Antonio Valentin
2,
Margherita Rosati
2,
Cristina Bergamaschi
1 and
George N. Pavlakis
2
1
Human Retrovirus Pathogenesis Section, Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, P.O. Box B, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
2
Human Retrovirus Section, Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, P.O. Box B, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2014, 2(2), 354-379; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2020354
Received: 21 February 2014 / Revised: 11 April 2014 / Accepted: 18 April 2014 / Published: 14 May 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue DNA Vaccines)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Inefficient DNA delivery methods and low expression of plasmid DNA have been major obstacles for the use of plasmid DNA as vaccine for HIV/AIDS. This review describes successful efforts to improve DNA vaccine methodology over the past ~30 years. DNA vaccination, either alone or in combination with other methods, has the potential to be a rapid, safe, and effective vaccine platform against AIDS. Recent clinical trials suggest the feasibility of its translation to the clinic.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Different vaccine approaches, including the use of plasmid DNA, recombinant viral vectors, protein or peptides and combination thereof in prime-boost regimens are being pursued as potential vaccines against HIV/AIDS. More than 30 trials are currently being conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity of promising HIV vaccine candidates. Four efficacy clinical trials have been completed: (i) gp120 (VaxGen) [1,2,3,4]; (ii) recombinant Ad5 (STEP) [5,6,7]; (iii) DNA prime-recombinant Ad5 boost (HVTN 505) [8]; (IV) combination of recombinant Canarypox ALVAC®-HIV (vCP1521; containing Gag, PR and Env) with gp120 Env protein (AIDSVAX® B/E) [9]. Although the first three trials failed to show efficacy, the latter resulted in modest statistically significant protection from infection in the RV144 vaccine trial conducted in Thailand [9]. The limited efficacy and the fact that the vaccine-induced responses waned over time indicate that improved vaccine designs are needed to achieve long-lasting cross-clade immune responses able to prevent and contain infection. Importantly, the RV144 trial revealed a critical role of humoral responses in preventing infection. Anti-Env IgG antibodies targeting the V1V2 region correlated with protection from infection [10,11,12,13,14]. No vaccine-induced virus control was observed in the individuals who became infected, indicating that this vaccine failed to elicit efficient immune responses able to control viremia during the chronic phase of infection. Ideally, an effective vaccine against HIV should provide durable cross-clade humoral immune responses at the portal of entry and arm the cellular immune system with cytotoxic effector memory cells able to contain or eliminate any break-through infection. Therefore, there is urgent need to identify more efficacious vaccine regimens. The use of DNA as vaccine platform is promising due to its simplicity, scalability, and possibility of repeated applications due to the lack of immunity against the vector (for reviews see [15,16,17]). To date, three DNA vaccines for animal use have been approved: (i) against equine West Nile Virus infection in horses [18,19]; (ii) a therapeutic cancer vaccine against melanoma in dogs [20]; and (iii) a vaccine against infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) in salmon [21,22,23]. In the HIV vaccine field, few trials have used DNA as the single vaccine modality due to its relatively low immunogenicity in primates, but DNA vaccination was shown to protect macaques from chronic viremia [24,25,26]. Yet, DNA vaccination methods that optimize immunogen expression and delivery have made great progress in improving immune responses, and it was further shown that DNA vaccines induce long-lasting immunity against HIV/SIV in non-human primates [24,27,28,29].

2. Regulated HIV gag and env Expression

The HIV Gag and Env proteins represent key targets for vaccine development. However, from the onset of vaccine development in the mid 80s, HIV DNA as vaccine regimen was found to be poorly immunogenic. Several obstacles needed to be overcome to make DNA a contender in the race of developing an HIV vaccine, including levels of antigen expression and DNA delivery. We now know that the level of antigen expression is critical to induce a potent immune response, but in the past many labs failed to get good expression of HIV Gag and Env, resulting in very poor immunogenicity in animal models. In retrospect, the limited understanding of the rules for efficient gene expression had a serious negative impact resulting in suboptimal levels of antigen production and, subsequently, modest immunogenicity. The reason for this failure is based on the fact, that expression of HIV gag and env is regulated by the viral Rev protein (for reviews see [30,31,32,33] and references therein]. Rev is essential for the export of the unspliced and partially spliced mRNAs [34] encoding the structural viral proteins, and mediates production of infectious virions. Rev-minus virus mutants are unable to replicate [35,36], whereas trans-complementation of the Rev-minus HIV with Rev restored expression of gag and env mRNA as well as virus production, demonstrating the essential role of this regulatory factor. Rev interacts with the cis-acting RNA recognition motif termed Rev Responsive Element (RRE) [37,38], a highly structured RNA element embedded within the env coding region present only in the unspliced and partially spliced HIV mRNAs, and promotes their export and expression. The discovery of the HIV Rev mechanism of function opened up new opportunities to understand nucleo-cytoplasmic transport, and posttranscriptional regulation in general, of both viral and cellular mRNAs (reviewed in [30]).
Dissection of the underlying mechanism led to the identification of several regions embedded within the intronic regions in the gag, pol and env coding sequences termed INS (instability sequences) or CRS (cis-acting repressive signals) that have a cis-acting negative effect on viral mRNA expression [37,39,40,41,42,43,44] and affect stability, export and expression of this subset of viral mRNAs (see below). Together, the combination of Rev in trans and its RNA interaction site RRE in cis corrects the defect caused by these negative-acting sequences resulting in efficient Gag/Pol and Env expression and virus production. In conclusion, recognition of this basic regulatory mechanism mediated by the viral Rev protein proved to be the key to achieve efficient expression by HIV gag and env encoding plasmid DNAs.

3. Method of RNA/Codon Optimization to Circumvent the Poor Expression of HIV gag/pol and env

The discovery of the role of Rev in the expression of HIV gag/pol and env provided critical information on how to overcome the poor expression from recombinant vectors containing sub-genomic HIV regions. Yet, this arrangement did not lead to high levels of expression in mouse cells, because the Rev protein does not work efficiently in these cells. This limitation made the study of several recombinant HIV vaccines very challenging or impossible in mice and rabbits, critical models for studying immunogenicity.
The question then arose whether alternative methods could be found to make the HIV gag and env expression independent of the viral regulatory factor Rev. The initial identification of the negative-acting INS sequences within the coding sequence of gag mRNA that were inhibiting expression and affecting the stability of mRNA [40,41], even when placed outside the translated region, suggested they were acting at the level of the mRNA and not during translation at the ribosome. These facts supported the model in which INS/CRS elements provide interaction sites for cellular factors that negatively affect the fate of these transcripts in the nuclear compartment, which consequently affects their fate in the cytoplasm inhibiting translation. This down-regulatory effect can be counteracted by the presence of the HIV posttranscriptional regulatory systems (Rev-RRE). Alternatively, Rev-RRE can be replaced by other RNA export systems such as the retroviral cis-acting transport elements CTE or RTE, acting via the cellular NXF1 and RMB15 proteins (reviewed in [30] and references therein). A third method developed by us [40,41] was the removal of the negative-acting RNA instability signals (INS) through RNA/codon optimization.
This alternative method, RNA/codon optimization, which changes the nucleotide sequence without altering the coding potential of the mRNA, was initially achieved by altering the nucleotide composition within eight INS regions in the gag mRNA. Changes in 81 of the 1500 nt in the gag gene (changing the sequence of 69 of 500 codons in gag) without altering the produced protein led to a profound >100-fold increase in Gag protein expression in the absence of Rev/RRE [39,40,41]. It is now apparent that INS elements interact with many different factors and thus they have diverse nucleotide sequences. Some INS elements contain classical AU-rich elements with the signature motif AUUUA also found in the 3'UTR of many cytokine and other mRNAs. Such elements are responsible for the posttranscriptional control of many cellular genes. The INS elements exert their function independent of splicing, even when placed 3' of the coding sequence. A proof that INS elements act at the level of mRNA in the nucleus is provided by the fact that INS have no negative effect on expression from recombinant poxvirus vectors (MVA, ALVAC), which produce mRNAs that are confined to the cytoplasm, and therefore “escape” the regulated nuclear export process. In contrast, expression of INS-containing mRNAs from recombinant Adenovirus and Herpes-based vectors is severely affected, because these viruses go to the nucleus and depend on the nuclear export machinery for their expression.
Thus, RNA/codon optimization inactivates the RNA-embedded inhibitory signals (INS) and results in high level Rev-independent production of Gag, Pol and Env (for detailed references see [30]). The discovery of INS/CRS and their effective elimination by RNA optimization have important practical application in the use of such RNA optimized HIV genes in DNA plasmids or recombinant viral vectors currently used in many vaccine studies in monkeys and humans. This general method of RNA/codon optimization is a commonly applied technology for gene transfer studies; it is used successfully for the optimization of numerous viral and cellular mRNAs and results in great gains in mRNA stability, transport and expression. Importantly, most of the candidate AIDS vaccines moving towards the clinic incorporate RNA/codon optimization to achieve efficient antigen expression.

4. Methods to Improve HIV/SIV DNA Vaccine Regimen

Several steps are critical to maximize the efficacy of an HIV DNA vaccine regimen (Figure 1), including optimization of plasmid DNA, optimization of immunogen, DNA delivery method, and the inclusion of molecular adjuvants. (i) To maximize antigen production from plasmid DNA, the RNA/codon optimized genes (see above) are inserted into expression vectors which typically use the human CMV enhancer/promoter and provide a potent initiation of translation signal such as the Kozak sequence (5'-gccgccaccATG(G)-3') or the HIV-1 tat sequence (5'-aagaaATG(G)-3') to initiate translation of the gene of interest and the bovine growth hormone (BGH) polyadenylation signal in a plasmid backbone optimized for replication in bacteria, which may also contain antibiotic genes as selection, typically the kanamycin gene. (ii) A second parameter to improve immunogenicity has also been extensively explored, namely the modification of the natural immunogen. One of the main features of DNA vaccines is versatility and ease of rapid alterations of the expressed immunogen. Although initially the focus was to produce authentic viral proteins as immunogens, it was discovered that modification of the produced immunogen could have advantages as a vaccine. In addition to modifications resulting in increased expression, deletions and fusions of immunogens may lead to improved secretion, rapid degradation or transport to different cellular compartments with the ultimate goal of enhancing immunogenicity. Many such variations have been applied taking advantage of the easy methodology provided by genetic engineering. For HIV/SIV antigens, several methods are employed to improve secretion using signal peptides such as tissue plasminogen activator (tPa) [45,46], or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [47]; addition of IgE leader to improve expression [48]; embedding the antigen within LAMP to target the fusion protein to the major histocompatibility complex type II (MHC II) processing compartment [49,50,51], fusion to MCP-3 to target immunogens to antigen-presenting cells [26,49], and fusion to signals promoting proteasomal degradation and presentation by the MHC class I molecules such as ubiquitin [52,53,54] or beta-catenin [26]. (iii) An important milestone in making DNA an attractive vaccine vehicle has been the improvement of in vivo delivery. Naked DNA is picked up poorly by primary cells and its expression is minimal. To improve delivery to the nucleus, several methods have been developed including intramuscular DNA delivery by in vivo electroporation (IM/EP) ([55,56,57,58,59,60,61] reviewed in [62,63,64,65]); skin or intradermal electroporation [66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73], skin patches [74], liposome delivery with Vaxfectin® [75,76], DNA formulated in liposomes [77]; gene gun [78] or biojector [79,80,81]. (iv) Fourth, different strategies to increase the immunogenicity of HIV DNA vaccination in macaques are being pursued, including combination of improved DNA vectors and cytokine DNAs, i.e., IL-12 [82,83,84,85,86,87,88], IL-15 [89,90,91]; IL-2 [89,92,93,94]; GM-CSF [95,96,97,98], chemokines such as RANTES [99] and costimulatory molecules such as CD40L [100,101,102]. (v) In addition to intramuscular and intradermal routes, DNA can also be delivered via the intranasal, oral, intestinal, and vaginal routes [89,92,93,103].
Vaccines 02 00354 g001 1024
Figure 1. Optimization of DNA expression and delivery: from bench to bedside. Several steps are necessary to improve the efficiency of DNA as vaccine including RNA/codon optimization of the gene, the use of optimized expression vectors, and combinations of DNA vaccine with molecular adjuvants to increase immunogenicity and using different delivery methods and sites.
Figure 1. Optimization of DNA expression and delivery: from bench to bedside. Several steps are necessary to improve the efficiency of DNA as vaccine including RNA/codon optimization of the gene, the use of optimized expression vectors, and combinations of DNA vaccine with molecular adjuvants to increase immunogenicity and using different delivery methods and sites.
Vaccines 02 00354 g001
We have been focusing on the use IL-12 DNA as molecular adjuvant together with RNA/codon optimized HIV/SIV DNA vaccines in macaque studies [88,104]. Importantly, inclusion of IL-12 resulted in an increase in both vaccine-induced magnitude and breadth of cellular and humoral immunity, even in combination with the efficient electroporation delivery [60,88,104]. In addition, a recent human trial using HIV gag DNA showed that inclusion of IL-12 DNA is advantageous, resulting in both increased frequency of responders and level of Gag-specific immunity [105,106], which is in agreement with the data obtained in macaques. Together, the use of IM/EP delivery and inclusion of IL-12 DNA showed a major improvement for HIV DNA vaccine immunogenicity in humans. Previous vaccine trials indicated that the magnitude of immune responses after DNA vaccination using conventional injection methods is low in humans ([107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117]; reviewed in [118]), similar to the conclusions from macaque studies using the same methodology. Clearly, successive studies showed incremental improvements of vaccine-induced immunity. Findings from the macaque model were shown to translate well into clinical trials [105,106,119], validating the ability of this model to identify improved vaccine candidates. As a result of recent studies, there is a strong and renewed interest in DNA vaccines, due to the accumulating evidence of their increased immunogenicity in humans. Importantly, the robust and effective cellular immunity achieved by optimized DNA is also an important consideration for the expanding field of cancer vaccines.

5. HIV/SIV DNA Vaccine Provide Persistent Immunity

A critical feature of any vaccine is the longevity of the induced immune responses. The RV144 vaccine trial in Thailand [9] elicited immune responses that waned rapidly after the vaccination period, suggesting that the transient nature of the elicited immunity could be at least partially responsible for the limited vaccine efficacy. A first study assessing the longevity of the immune responses elicited by EP-delivered DNA vaccines in non-human primates showed persistence of Env humoral responses over one-year of follow-up [120]. We investigated the durability of both cellular and humoral immune responses elicited by the EP delivered DNA vaccine in macaques [28] and reported that SIV DNA vaccination was able to induce persistent immune responses, which were boosted with each subsequent immunization, even after an extended 90-week rest period, indicating long-lasting vaccine-induced immunological memory. We found remarkable durability of Gag and Env immune responses in DNA EP vaccinated macaques for several years [28,29]. Other DNA delivery methods, such as intradermal EP or use of Vaxfectin® as a cationic lipid-based formulation, also induced potent immunity with impressive durability detectable for 1–2 years in macaques [76,121,122]. Together, these studies demonstrate another important property of DNA vaccines, which is the remarkable durability of the elicited immune responses.

6. HIV-1 Diversity and DNA Vaccine

HIV sequence diversity and the presence of potential immunodominant “decoy” epitopes are additional hurdles in the development of an effective AIDS vaccine. The plasticity of HIV allows the virus to escape from the immune system generating an enormous number of variants. Another hurdle has been the observation that immunodominant (ID) epitopes present within HIV proteins may impair the induction of more relevant responses [123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134]. These issues need to be taken into consideration for successful vaccine design. Several approaches are being explored, including strategies that use consensus, center-of-tree or ancestral sequences, combination of multiple strains, mosaic immunogens, which are composed of in silico recombined natural sequences, immunogens composed of previously identified epitopes, and chimeric molecules expressing a selection of the most conserved epitopes from different clades of HIV ([47,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153], reviewed in [154]).
One of our vaccine approaches focuses on the development of immunogens based on strictly conserved elements (CE) of HIV-1 M group [155,156], which induce immune responses to nearly invariable proteome segments, while excluding responses to variable and potentially immunodominant “decoy” epitopes. We developed a prototype CE DNA vaccine and demonstrated that immunization with this conserved element DNA elicited robust cellular and humoral immune responses against CE, which cannot be achieved by full-length immunogen vaccination in mice and macaques [47,153,157]. We demonstrated that priming with CE DNA and boosting with DNA expressing the full-length immunogen is an effective strategy to maximize responses against Gag, providing a novel concept to increase the magnitude and breadth, including epitopes within highly conserved elements, of vaccine-induced immune responses [153,157]. Thus, inclusion of the CE immunogen as part of an HIV-1 vaccine provides a novel and effective vaccine strategy to avoid eliciting responses against potentially immunodominant decoy epitopes, while focusing the responses to critical elements of the virus. The testing of this novel concept in humans will be pursued in a clinical trial.

7. Optimizing Both Arms of the Immune System by DNA & Protein Co-immunization Strategy

Initial efforts for the development of an HIV vaccine showed poor immunogenicity [109], and improved immunogenicity was only found upon using the efficient delivery method of in vivo electroporation [105,119,158]. Several vaccines using DNA as a prime in combination with different boosts are also being pursued in clinical trials, including DNA prime-protein boost [114,159], DNA in combination with rMVA [160,161,162,163,164,165] and DNA prime-rAde boost [8].
As an alternative strategy, we combined the DNA and protein vaccine modalities in a co-immunization regimen. This strategy is based on two observations: (i) DNA vaccination is able to elicit strong cellular immunity, whereas compared to a protein only vaccine, the antibody responses are lower; and (ii) protein vaccination induces strong antibody responses but less robust cellular immunity. Therefore, it was thought that combining these two vaccine regimens into a co-immunization strategy might be ideal to optimally trigger both arms (humoral and cellular) of the immune system. Based on initial observations, co-immunization with DNA delivered by needle and syringe and inactivated SIV virus particles as the protein source induced antibodies that were higher in magnitude and longevity than either component alone [29]. The co-immunization concept was further tested in mice [166,167], rabbits [167] and macaques [24,29,166]. Collectively, it was found that HIV DNA & protein co-immunization was superior in eliciting humoral immune responses to vaccination with either of the two individual components alone, even when DNA was administered by the more efficient EP method. Importantly, HIV DNA & protein co-immunization vaccine regimen did not decrease the magnitude or alter the specificity of the cellular responses [24,29,166]. In addition to inducing the highest systemic binding and cross-neutralizing antibodies to HIV and SIV Env [29,166], this vaccine regimen also induced the highest Env-specific IgG in saliva [29] and promoted improved dissemination of immune responses to mucosal sites, including rectal fluids [24,29,168].
In conclusion, DNA & protein co-delivery in a simple vaccine regimen combines the strength of each vaccine component, resulting in improved magnitude, extended longevity and increased mucosal dissemination of the induced antibodies in macaques.

8. Efficacy of DNA Vaccine in the Macaque Model

Using DNA as the only vaccine component, we and others previously reported the induction of protective immune responses against SIV or SHIV [24,25,26,99,169,170,171,172,173], supporting the effectiveness of SIV DNA vaccines to induce potent T cell responses with proliferative capability and multi-functionality, including cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity. Among several parameters, we found that vaccine induced SIV-specific CD4+ cytotoxic T cells contributed to control of viremia [24]. Interestingly, such antigen-specific cytotoxic memory CD4+ T cells were also found to contribute to virus control in macaques infected with a truly non-pathogenic live-attenuated SIV [174].
Other DNA based vaccination regimens including DNA as prime followed by heterologous boosts, e.g., protein [175,176,177,178]; rNYVac [179,180,181]; rAde [104,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195]; rHSV [196]; rMVA [87,89,94,95,96,103,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204] also reported both immunological benefit and reduction of viremia to different extents. Other prime-boost regimens, e.g., recombinant Rubella vectors [205], also showed promising immunological benefit. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the DNA vaccine platform, known for its potency as T cell vaccine, also contributes to protection from infection.
Interest in using DNA as a vaccine vehicle for HIV is not limited to preventive vaccine but also for potential application as therapeutic vaccine. Using the SIV/macaque model, we demonstrated virological benefit induced by therapeutic DNA vaccination in SIV macaques under anti-retroviral treatment (ART). DNA vaccination administered by needle and syringe via the IM route or by IM/EP elicited potent cellular responses able to greatly reduce virus load upon release from ART, leading to durable control of viremia over many months [90,206]. Because DNA vaccination can be repeatedly administered without development of immunity to the vector, repeated cycles of therapeutic vaccination resulted in a great benefit with a further reduction in viremia. Recent therapeutic trials using DNA vaccines showed improved immunogenicity ([207,208,209,210], for recent review see [211,212]) in agreement with findings of the macaque model. Thus, vaccination with plasmid DNAs has several advantages, including the possibility for repeated administration, and was shown to induce potent, efficacious, and long-lasting immune responses.

9. Perspective and Conclusions

DNA vaccine has great advantages in versatility, scalability, safety and relative simplicity of manufacturing. For HIV, research over the past ~30 years has shown that understanding the basic molecular biology of an immunogen is critical to generating efficient expression vectors, which together with improved DNA delivery, has been able to induce long-lasting cellular and humoral immune responses. Taken together, these findings indicate that DNA-based vaccines are excellent candidates for translation into clinical trials for the development of practical AIDS vaccines.

Acknowledgments

We thank T. Jones for editorial assistance. This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NCI/NIH).

Author Contributions

Barbara K. Felber wrote the manuscript. Antonio Valentin, Margherita Rosati, Cristina Bergamaschi and George N. Pavlakis contributed to the writing and editing of this review article.

Conflicts of Interest

Barbara K. Felber and George N. Pavlakis are inventors on US Government-owned patents and patent applications related to DNA vaccines and gene expression optimization.

References

  1. Berman, P.W. Development of bivalent rgp120 vaccines to prevent HIV type 1 infection. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 1998, 14, S277–S289. [Google Scholar]
  2. Francis, D.P.; Gregory, T.; McElrath, M.J.; Belshe, R.B.; Gorse, G.J.; Migasena, S.; Kitayaporn, D.; Pitisuttitham, P.; Matthews, T.; Schwartz, D.H.; et al. Advancing AIDSVAX to phase 3. Safety, immunogenicity, and plans for phase 3. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 1998, 14, S325–S331. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pitisuttithum, P.; Gilbert, P.; Gurwith, M.; Heyward, W.; Martin, M.; van Griensven, F.; Hu, D.; Tappero, J.W.; Choopanya, K. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of a bivalent recombinant glycoprotein 120 HIV-1 vaccine among injection drug users in Bangkok, Thailand. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 194, 1661–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Flynn, N.M.; Forthal, D.N.; Harro, C.D.; Judson, F.N.; Mayer, K.H.; Para, M.F. Placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine to prevent HIV-1 infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 191, 654–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McElrath, M.J.; de Rosa, S.C.; Moodie, Z.; Dubey, S.; Kierstead, L.; Janes, H.; Defawe, O.D.; Carter, D.K.; Hural, J.; Akondy, R.; et al. HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept step study: A case-cohort analysis. Lancet 2008, 372, 1894–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rolland, M.; Tovanabutra, S.; deCamp, A.C.; Frahm, N.; Gilbert, P.B.; Sanders-Buell, E.; Heath, L.; Magaret, C.A.; Bose, M.; Bradfield, A.; et al. Genetic impact of vaccination on breakthrough HIV-1 sequences from the STEP trial. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Buchbinder, S.P.; Mehrotra, D.V.; Duerr, A.; Fitzgerald, D.W.; Mogg, R.; Li, D.; Gilbert, P.B.; Lama, J.R.; Marmor, M.; del Rio, C.; et al. Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial. Lancet 2008, 372, 1881–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hammer, S.M.; Sobieszczyk, M.E.; Janes, H.; Karuna, S.T.; Mulligan, M.J.; Grove, D.; Koblin, B.A.; Buchbinder, S.P.; Keefer, M.C.; Tomaras, G.D.; et al. Efficacy trial of a DNA/rAd5 HIV-1 preventive vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 2083–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rerks-Ngarm, S.; Pitisuttithum, P.; Nitayaphan, S.; Kaewkungwal, J.; Chiu, J.; Paris, R.; Premsri, N.; Namwat, C.; de Souza, M.; Adams, E.; et al. Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 2209–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rolland, M.; Edlefsen, P.T.; Larsen, B.B.; Tovanabutra, S.; Sanders-Buell, E.; Hertz, T.; deCamp, A.C.; Carrico, C.; Menis, S.; Magaret, C.A.; et al. Increased HIV-1 vaccine efficacy against viruses with genetic signatures in Env V2. Nature 2012, 490, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Haynes, B.F.; Gilbert, P.B.; McElrath, M.J.; Zolla-Pazner, S.; Tomaras, G.D.; Alam, S.M.; Evans, D.T.; Montefiori, D.C.; Karnasuta, C.; Sutthent, R.; et al. Immune-correlates analysis of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 1275–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gottardo, R.; Bailer, R.T.; Korber, B.T.; Gnanakaran, S.; Phillips, J.; Shen, X.; Tomaras, G.D.; Turk, E.; Imholte, G.; Eckler, L.; et al. Plasma IgG to linear epitopes in the V2 and V3 regions of HIV-1 gp120 correlate with a reduced risk of infection in the RV144 vaccine efficacy trial. PLoS One 2013, 8, e75665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zolla-Pazner, S.; deCamp, A.C.; Cardozo, T.; Karasavvas, N.; Gottardo, R.; Williams, C.; Morris, D.E.; Tomaras, G.; Rao, M.; Billings, E.; et al. Analysis of V2 antibody responses induced in vaccinees in the ALVAC/AIDSVAX HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial. PLoS One 2013, 8, e53629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Karasavvas, N.; Billings, E.; Rao, M.; Williams, C.; Zolla-Pazner, S.; Bailer, R.T.; Koup, R.A.; Madnote, S.; Arworn, D.; Shen, X.; et al. The Thai phase III HIV type 1 vaccine trial (RV144) regimen induces antibodies that target conserved regions within the V2 loop of gp120. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2012, 28, 1444–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ferraro, B.; Morrow, M.P.; Hutnick, N.A.; Shin, T.H.; Lucke, C.E.; Weiner, D.B. Clinical applications of DNA vaccines: Current progress. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Salonius, K.; Simard, N.; Harland, R.; Ulmer, J.B. The road to licensure of a DNA vaccine. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2007, 8, 635–641. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ulmer, J.B.; Wahren, B.; Liu, M.A. DNA vaccines for HIV/AIDS. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2006, 1, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bunning, M.L.; Bowen, R.A.; Cropp, B.; Sullivan, K.; Davis, B.; Komar, N.; Godsey, M.; Baker, D.; Hettler, D.; Holmes, D.; et al. Experimental infection of horses with West Nile virus and their potential to infect mosquitoes and serve as amplifying hosts. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2001, 951, 338–339. [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis, B.S.; Chang, G.J.; Cropp, B.; Roehrig, J.T.; Martin, D.A.; Mitchell, C.J.; Bowen, R.; Bunning, M.L. West Nile virus recombinant DNA vaccine protects mouse and horse from virus challenge and expresses in vitro a noninfectious recombinant antigen that can be used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 4040–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bergman, P.J.; McKnight, J.; Novosad, A.; Charney, S.; Farrelly, J.; Craft, D.; Wulderk, M.; Jeffers, Y.; Sadelain, M.; Hohenhaus, A.E.; et al. Long-term survival of dogs with advanced malignant melanoma after DNA vaccination with xenogeneic human tyrosinase: A phase I trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar]
  21. Traxler, G.S.; Anderson, E.; LaPatra, S.E.; Richard, J.; Shewmaker, B.; Kurath, G. Naked DNA vaccination of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar against IHNV. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 1999, 38, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Corbeil, S.; Lapatra, S.E.; Anderson, E.D.; Jones, J.; Vincent, B.; Hsu, Y.L.; Kurath, G. Evaluation of the protective immunogenicity of the N, P, M, NV and G proteins of infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss using DNA vaccines. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 1999, 39, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Garver, K.A.; LaPatra, S.E.; Kurath, G. Efficacy of an infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN) virus DNA vaccine in Chinook Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and sockeye O. nerka salmon. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2005, 64, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patel, V.; Jalah, R.; Kulkarni, V.; Valentin, A.; Rosati, M.; Alicea, C.; von Gegerfelt, A.; Huang, W.; Guan, Y.; Keele, B.; et al. DNA and virus particle vaccination protects against acquisition and confers control of viremia upon heterologous SIV challenge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 2975–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rosati, M.; Bergamaschi, C.; Valentin, A.; Kulkarni, V.; Jalah, R.; Patel, V.; von Gegerfelt, A.S.; Montefiori, D.C.; Venzon, D.; Khan, A.S.; et al. DNA vaccination in rhesus macaques induces potent immune responses and decreases acute and chronic viremia after SIVmac251 challenge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 15831–15836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rosati, M.; von Gegerfelt, A.; Roth, P.; Alicea, C.; Valentin, A.; Robert-Guroff, M.; Venzon, D.; Montefiori, D.C.; Markham, P.; Felber, B.K.; et al. DNA vaccines expressing different forms of simian immunodeficiency virus antigens decrease viremia upon SIVmac251 challenge. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 8480–8492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cristillo, A.D.; Galmin, L.; Restrepo, S.; Hudacik, L.; Suschak, J.; Lewis, B.; Draghia-Akli, R.; Aziz, N.; Weiss, D.; Markham, P.; et al. HIV-1 Env vaccine comprised of electroporated DNA and protein co-administered with Talabostat. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 370, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patel, V.; Valentin, A.; Kulkarni, V.; Rosati, M.; Bergamaschi, C.; Jalah, R.; Alicea, C.; Minang, J.T.; Trivett, M.T.; Ohlen, C.; et al. Long-lasting humoral and cellular immune responses and mucosal dissemination after intramuscular DNA immunization. Vaccine 2010, 28, 4827–4836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jalah, R.; Kulkarni, V.; Patel, V.; Rosati, M.; Alicea, C.; Bear, J.; Yu, L.; Guan, Y.; Shen, X.; Tomaras, G.D.; et al. DNA and protein co-immunization improves the magnitude and longevity of humoral immune responses in rhesus macaques. PLoS One 2014, 9, e91550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Felber, B.K.; Zolotukhin, A.S.; Pavlakis, G.N. Posttranscriptional control of HIV-1 and other retroviruses and its practical applications. Adv. Pharmacol. 2007, 55, 161–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cochrane, A.W.; McNally, M.T.; Mouland, A.J. The retrovirus RNA trafficking granule: From birth to maturity. Retrovirology 2006, 3, e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, C.Y.; Liu, X.; Boris-Lawrie, K.; Sharma, A.; Jeang, K.T. Cellular RNA helicases and HIV-1: Insights from genome-wide, proteomic, and molecular studies. Virus Res. 2013, 171, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yedavalli, V.S.; Jeang, K.T. Rev-ing up post-transcriptional HIV-1 RNA expression. RNA Biol. 2011, 8, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Felber, B.K.; Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M.; Cladaras, C.; Copeland, T.; Pavlakis, G.N. rev Protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 affects the stability and transport of the viral mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 1495–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sodroski, J.; Goh, W.C.; Rosen, C.; Dayton, A.; Terwilliger, E.; Haseltine, W. A second post-transcriptional trans-activator gene required for HTLV-III replication. Nature 1986, 321, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Feinberg, M.B.; Jarrett, R.F.; Aldovini, A.; Gallo, R.C.; Wong-Staal, F. HTLV-III expression and production involve complex regulation at the levels of splicing and translation of viral RNA. Cell 1986, 46, 807–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M.; Felber, B.K.; Cladaras, C.; Athanassopoulos, A.; Tse, A.; Pavlakis, G.N. The rev (trs/art) protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 affects viral mRNA and protein expression via a cis-acting sequence in the env region. J. Virol. 1989, 63, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar]
  38. Malim, M.H.; Hauber, J.; Le, S.Y.; Maizel, J.V.; Cullen, B.R. The HIV-1 rev trans-activator acts through a structured target sequence to activate nuclear export of unspliced viral mRNA. Nature 1989, 338, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schneider, R.; Campbell, M.; Nasioulas, G.; Felber, B.K.; Pavlakis, G.N. Inactivation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 inhibitory elements allows Rev-independent expression of Gag and Gag/protease and particle formation. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 4892–4903. [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwartz, S.; Campbell, M.; Nasioulas, G.; Harrison, J.; Felber, B.K.; Pavlakis, G.N. Mutational inactivation of an inhibitory sequence in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 results in Rev-independent gag expression. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 7176–7182. [Google Scholar]
  41. Schwartz, S.; Felber, B.K.; Pavlakis, G.N. Distinct RNA sequences in the gag region of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 decrease RNA stability and inhibit expression in the absence of Rev protein. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 150–159. [Google Scholar]
  42. Nasioulas, G.; Zolotukhin, A.S.; Tabernero, C.; Solomin, L.; Cunningham, C.P.; Pavlakis, G.N.; Felber, B.K. Elements distinct from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 splice sites are responsible for the Rev dependence of env mRNA. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 2986–2993. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cochrane, A.W.; Jones, K.S.; Beidas, S.; Dillon, P.J.; Skalka, A.M.; Rosen, C.A. Identification and characterization of intragenic sequences which repress human immunodeficiency virus structural gene expression. J. Virol. 1991, 65, 5305–5313. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rosen, C.A.; Terwilliger, E.; Dayton, A.; Sodroski, J.G.; Haseltine, W.A. Intragenic cis-acting art gene-responsive sequences of the human immunodeficiency virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 2071–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wallace, A.; West, K.; Rothman, A.L.; Ennis, F.A.; Lu, S.; Wang, S. Post-translational intracellular trafficking determines the type of immune response elicited by DNA vaccines expressing Gag antigen of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1). Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2013, 9, 2095–2102. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, S.; Farfan-Arribas, D.J.; Shen, S.; Chou, T.H.; Hirsch, A.; He, F.; Lu, S. Relative contributions of codon usage, promoter efficiency and leader sequence to the antigen expression and immunogenicity of HIV-1 Env DNA vaccine. Vaccine 2006, 24, 4531–4540. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kulkarni, V.; Rosati, M.; Valentin, A.; Ganneru, B.; Singh, A.K.; Yan, J.; Rolland, M.; Alicea, C.; Beach, R.K.; Zhang, G.M.; et al. HIV-1 p24gag derived conserved element DNA vaccine increases the breadth of immune response in mice. PLoS One 2013, 8, e60245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumar, S.; Yan, J.; Muthumani, K.; Ramanathan, M.P.; Yoon, H.; Pavlakis, G.N.; Felber, B.K.; Sidhu, M.; Boyer, J.D.; Weiner, D.B. Immunogenicity testing of a novel engineered HIV-1 envelope gp140 DNA vaccine construct. DNA Cell Biol. 2006, 25, 383–392. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kulkarni, V.; Jalah, R.; Ganneru, B.; Bergamaschi, C.; Alicea, C.; von Gegerfelt, A.; Patel, V.; Zhang, G.M.; Chowdhury, B.; Broderick, K.E.; et al. Comparison of immune responses generated by optimized DNA vaccination against SIV antigens in mice and macaques. Vaccine 2011, 29, 6742–6754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Valentin, A.; Chikhlikar, P.; Patel, V.; Rosati, M.; Maciel, M.; Chang, K.H.; Silvera, P.; Felber, B.K.; Pavlakis, G.N.; August, J.T.; et al. Comparison of DNA vaccines producing HIV-1 Gag and LAMP/Gag chimera in rhesus macaques reveals antigen-specific T-cell responses with distinct phenotypes. Vaccine 2009, 27, 4840–4849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chikhlikar, P.; de Arruda, L.B.; Maciel, M.; Silvera, P.; Lewis, M.G.; August, J.T.; Marques, E.T. DNA encoding an HIV-1 Gag/human lysosome-associated membrane protein-1 chimera elicits a broad cellular and humoral immune response in rhesus macaques. PLoS One 2006, 1, e135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Benlahrech, A.; Meiser, A.; Herath, S.; Papagatsias, T.; Athanasopoulos, T.; Li, F.; Self, S.; Bachy, V.; Hervouet, C.; Logan, K.; et al. Fragmentation of SIV-gag vaccine induces broader T cell responses. PLoS One 2012, 7, e48038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Stack, J.H.; Whitney, M.; Rodems, S.M.; Pollok, B.A. A ubiquitin-based tagging system for controlled modulation of protein stability. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 1298–1302. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tobery, T.W.; Siliciano, R.F. Targeting of HIV-1 antigens for rapid intracellular degradation enhances cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) recognition and the induction of de novo CTL responses in vivo after immunization. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 185, 909–920. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mathiesen, I. Electropermeabilization of skeletal muscle enhances gene transfer in vivo. Gene Ther. 1999, 6, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Heller, L.; Pottinger, C.; Jaroszeski, M.J.; Gilbert, R.; Heller, R. In vivo electroporation of plasmidsencoding GM-CSF or interleukin-2 into existing B16 melanomas combined with electrochemotherapy induces long-term antitumour immunity. Melanoma Res. 2000, 10, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Widera, G.; Austin, M.; Rabussay, D.; Goldbeck, C.; Barnett, S.W.; Chen, M.; Leung, L.; Otten, G.R.; Thudium, K.; Selby, M.J.; et al. Increased DNA vaccine delivery and immunogenicity by electroporation in vivo. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 4635–4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Selby, M.; Goldbeck, C.; Pertile, T.; Walsh, R.; Ulmer, J. Enhancement of DNA vaccine potency by electroporation in vivo. J. Biotechnol. 2000, 83, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Otten, G.; Schaefer, M.; Doe, B.; Liu, H.; Srivastava, I.; Megede, J.Z.; O’Hagan, D.; Donnelly, J.; Widera, G.; Rabussay, D.; et al. Enhancement of DNA vaccine potency in rhesus macaques by electroporation. Vaccine 2004, 22, 2489–2493. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hirao, L.A.; Wu, L.; Khan, A.S.; Hokey, D.A.; Yan, J.; Dai, A.; Betts, M.R.; Draghia-Akli, R.; Weiner, D.B. Combined effects of IL-12 and electroporation enhances the potency of DNA vaccination in macaques. Vaccine 2008, 26, 3112–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rosati, M.; Valentin, A.; Jalah, R.; Patel, V.; von Gegerfelt, A.; Bergamaschi, C.; Alicea, C.; Weiss, D.; Treece, J.; Pal, R.; et al. Increased immune responses in rhesus macaques by DNA vaccination combined with electroporation. Vaccine 2008, 26, 5223–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sardesai, N.Y.; Weiner, D.B. Electroporation delivery of DNA vaccines: Prospects for success. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2011, 23, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hutnick, N.A.; Myles, D.J.; Bian, C.B.; Muthumani, K.; Weiner, D.B. Selected approaches for increasing HIV DNA vaccine immunogenicity in vivo. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2012, 1, 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  64. Bodles-Brakhop, A.M.; Heller, R.; Draghia-Akli, R. Electroporation for the delivery of DNA-basedvaccines and immunotherapeutics: Current clinical developments. Mol. Ther. 2009, 17, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Flingai, S.; Czerwonko, M.; Goodman, J.; Kudchodkar, S.B.; Muthumani, K.; Weiner, D.B. Synthetic DNA vaccines: Improved vaccine potency by electroporation and co-delivered genetic adjuvants. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hallengard, D.; Brave, A.; Isaguliants, M.; Blomberg, P.; Enger, J.; Stout, R.; King, A.; Wahren, B. A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines. Genet. Vaccines Ther. 2012, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Roos, A.K.; Eriksson, F.; Timmons, J.A.; Gerhardt, J.; Nyman, U.; Gudmundsdotter, L.; Brave, A.; Wahren, B.; Pisa, P. Skin electroporation: Effects on transgene expression, DNA persistence and local tissue environment. PLoS One 2009, 4, e7226. [Google Scholar]
  68. Hooper, J.W.; Golden, J.W.; Ferro, A.M.; King, A.D. Smallpox DNA vaccine delivered by novel skin electroporation device protects mice against intranasal poxvirus challenge. Vaccine 2007, 25, 1814–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Brave, A.; Gudmundsdotter, L.; Sandstrom, E.; Haller, B.K.; Hallengard, D.; Maltais, A.K.; King, A.D.; Stout, R.R.; Blomberg, P.; Hoglund, U.; et al. Biodistribution, persistence and lack of integration of a multigene HIV vaccine delivered by needle-free intradermal injection and electroporation. Vaccine 2010, 28, 8203–8209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hutnick, N.A.; Myles, D.J.; Ferraro, B.; Lucke, C.; Lin, F.; Yan, J.; Broderick, K.E.; Khan, A.S.; Sardesai, N.Y.; Weiner, D.B. Intradermal DNA vaccination enhanced by low-current electroporation improves antigen expression and induces robust cellular and humoral immune responses. Hum. Gene Ther. 2012, 23, 943–950. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lin, F.; Shen, X.; Kichaev, G.; Mendoza, J.M.; Yang, M.; Armendi, P.; Yan, J.; Kobinger, G.P.; Bello, A.; Khan, A.S.; et al. Optimization of electroporation-enhanced intradermal delivery of DNAvaccine using a minimally invasive surface device. Hum. Gene Ther. Methods 2012, 23, 157–168. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kichaev, G.; Mendoza, J.M.; Amante, D.; Smith, T.R.; McCoy, J.R.; Sardesai, N.Y.; Broderick, K.E. Electroporation mediated DNA vaccination directly to a mucosal surface results in improved immune responses. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2013, 9, 2041–2048. [Google Scholar]
  73. Heller, R.; Cruz, Y.; Heller, L.C.; Gilbert, R.A.; Jaroszeski, M.J. Electrically mediated delivery of plasmid DNA to the skin, using a multielectrode array. Hum. Gene Ther. 2010, 21, 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  74. Lori, F. DermaVir: A plasmid DNA-based nanomedicine therapeutic vaccine for the treatment of HIV/AIDS. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2011, 10, 1371–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sullivan, S.M.; Doukas, J.; Hartikka, J.; Smith, L.; Rolland, A. Vaxfectin: A versatile adjuvant for plasmid DNA- and protein-based vaccines. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2010, 7, 1433–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kulkarni, V.; Rosati, M.; Valentin, A.; Jalah, R.; Alicea, C.; Yu, L.; Guan, Y.; Shen, X.; Tomaras, G.D.; LaBranche, C.; et al. Vaccination with Vaxfectin® adjuvanted SIV DNA induces long-lasting humoral immune responses able to reduce SIVmac251 Viremia. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2013, 9, 2069–2080. [Google Scholar]
  77. Templeton, N.S.; Lasic, D.D.; Frederik, P.M.; Strey, H.H.; Roberts, D.D.; Pavlakis, G.N. Improved DNA: Liposome complexes for increased systemic delivery and gene expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 1997, 15, 647–652. [Google Scholar]
  78. Fuller, D.H.; Simpson, L.; Cole, K.S.; Clements, J.E.; Panicali, D.L.; Montelaro, R.C.; Murphey-Corb, M.; Haynes, J.R. Gene gun-based nucleic acid immunization alone or in combination with recombinant vaccinia vectors suppresses virus burden in rhesus macaques challenged with a heterologous SIV. Immunol. Cell Biol. 1997, 75, 389–396. [Google Scholar]
  79. Aguiar, J.C.; Hedstrom, R.C.; Rogers, W.O.; Charoenvit, Y.; Sacci, J.B., Jr.; Lanar, D.E.; Majam, V.F.; Stout, R.R.; Hoffman, S.L. Enhancement of the immune response in rabbits to a malaria DNA vaccine by immunization with a needle-free jet device. Vaccine 2001, 20, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jackson, L.A.; Austin, G.; Chen, R.T.; Stout, R.; DeStefano, F.; Gorse, G.J.; Newman, F.K.; Yu, O.; Weniger, B.G. Safety and immunogenicity of varying dosages of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine administered by needle-free jet injectors. Vaccine 2001, 19, 4703–4709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Williams, J.; Fox-Leyva, L.; Christensen, C.; Fisher, D.; Schlicting, E.; Snowball, M.; Negus, S.; Mayers, J.; Koller, R.; Stout, R. Hepatitis A vaccine administration: Comparison between jet-injector and needle injection. Vaccine 2000, 18, 1939–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Boyer, J.D.; Robinson, T.M.; Kutzler, M.A.; Parkinson, R.; Calarota, S.A.; Sidhu, M.K.; Muthumani, K.; Lewis, M.; Pavlakis, G.; Felber, B.; et al. SIV DNA vaccine co-administered with IL-12 expression plasmid enhances CD8 SIV cellular immune responses in Cynomolgus macaques. J. Med. Primatol. 2005, 34, 262–270. [Google Scholar]
  83. Chong, S.Y.; Egan, M.A.; Kutzler, M.A.; Megati, S.; Masood, A.; Roopchard, V.; Garcia-Hand, D.; Montefiori, D.C.; Quiroz, J.; Rosati, M.; et al. Comparative ability of plasmid IL-12 and IL-15 to enhance cellular and humoral immune responses elicited by a SIVgag plasmid DNA vaccine and alter disease progression following SHIV(89.6P) challenge in rhesus macaques. Vaccine 2007, 25, 4967–4982. [Google Scholar]
  84. Schadeck, E.B.; Sidhu, M.; Egan, M.A.; Chong, S.Y.; Piacente, P.; Masood, A.; Garcia-Hand, D.; Cappello, S.; Roopchand, V.; Megati, S.; et al. A dose sparing effect by plasmid encoded IL-12 adjuvant on a SIVgag-plasmid DNA vaccine in rhesus macaques. Vaccine 2006, 24, 4677–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Robinson, T.M.; Sidhu, M.K.; Pavlakis, G.N.; Felber, B.K.; Silvera, P.; Lewis, M.G.; Eldridge, J.; Weiner, D.B.; Boyer, J.D. Macaques co-immunized with SIVgag/pol-HIVenv and IL-12 plasmid have increased cellular responses. J. Med. Primatol. 2007, 36, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Halwani, R.; Boyer, J.D.; Yassine-Diab, B.; Haddad, E.K.; Robinson, T.M.; Kumar, S.; Parkinson, R.; Wu, L.; Sidhu, M.K.; Phillipson-Weiner, R.; et al. Therapeutic vaccination with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-DNA+IL-12 or IL-15 induces distinct CD8 memory subsets in SIV-infected macaques. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 7969–7979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Manrique, M.; Micewicz, E.; Kozlowski, P.A.; Wang, S.W.; Aurora, D.; Wilson, R.L.; Ghebremichael, M.; Mazzara, G.; Montefiori, D.; Carville, A.; et al. DNA-MVA vaccine protectionafter X4 SHIV challenge in macaques correlates with day-of-challenge antiviral CD4+ cell-mediated immunity levels and postchallenge preservation of CD4+ T cell memory. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2008, 24, 505–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jalah, R.; Patel, V.; Kulkarni, V.; Rosati, M.; Alicea, C.; Ganneru, B.; von Gegerfelt, A.; Huang, W.; Guan, Y.; Broderick, K.E.; et al. IL-12 DNA as molecular vaccine adjuvant increases the cytotoxic T cell responses and breadth of humoral immune responses in SIV DNA vaccinated macaques. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2012, 8, 1620–1629. [Google Scholar]
  89. Manrique, M.; Kozlowski, P.A.; Wang, S.W.; Wilson, R.L.; Micewicz, E.; Montefiori, D.C.; Mansfield, K.G.; Carville, A.; Aldovini, A. Nasal DNA-MVA SIV vaccination provides more significant protection from progression to AIDS than a similar intramuscular vaccination. Mucosal Immunol. 2009, 2, 536–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Valentin, A.; von Gegerfelt, A.; Rosati, M.; Miteloudis, G.; Alicea, C.; Bergamaschi, C.; Jalah, R.; Patel, V.; Khan, A.S.; Draghia-Akli, R.; et al. Repeated DNA therapeutic vaccination of chronically SIV-infected macaques provides additional virological benefit. Vaccine 2010, 28, 1962–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Calarota, S.A.; Dai, A.; Trocio, J.N.; Weiner, D.B.; Lori, F.; Lisziewicz, J. IL-15 as memory T-cell adjuvant for topical HIV-1 DermaVir vaccine. Vaccine 2008, 26, 5188–5195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Manrique, M.; Kozlowski, P.A.; Cobo-Molinos, A.; Wang, S.W.; Wilson, R.L.; Mdel, P.M.-V.; Montefiori, D.C.; Carville, A.; Aldovini, A. Resistance to infection, early and persistent suppression of simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac251 viremia, and significant reduction of tissue viral burden after mucosal vaccination in female rhesus macaques. J. Virol., 2014. [Google Scholar]
  93. Manrique, M.; Kozlowski, P.A.; Cobo-Molinos, A.; Wang, S.W.; Wilson, R.L.; Montefiori, D.C.; Carville, A.; Aldovini, A. Immunogenicity of a vaccine regimen composed of simian immunodeficiency virus DNA, rMVA, and viral particles administered to female rhesus macaques via four different mucosal routes. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 4738–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Manrique, M.; Kozlowski, P.A.; Cobo-Molinos, A.; Wang, S.W.; Wilson, R.L.; Montefiori, D.C.; Mansfield, K.G.; Carville, A.; Aldovini, A. Long-term control of simian immunodeficiency virus mac251 viremia to undetectable levels in half of infected female rhesus macaques nasally vaccinated with simian immunodeficiency virus DNA/recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 3581–3593. [Google Scholar]
  95. Lai, L.; Kwa, S.; Kozlowski, P.A.; Montefiori, D.C.; Ferrari, G.; Johnson, W.E.; Hirsch, V.; Villinger, F.; Chennareddi, L.; Earl, P.L.; et al. Prevention of infection by a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor co-expressing DNA/modified vaccinia ankara simian immunodeficiency virus vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lai, L.; Vodros, D.; Kozlowski, P.A.; Montefiori, D.C.; Wilson, R.L.; Akerstrom, V.L.; Chennareddi, L.; Yu, T.; Kannanganat, S.; Ofielu, L.; et al. GM-CSF DNA: An adjuvant for higher avidity IgG, rectal IgA, and increased protection against the acute phase of a SHIV-89.6P challenge by a DNA/MVA immunodeficiency virus vaccine. Virology 2007, 369, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. O’Neill, E.; Bostik, V.; Montefiori, D.C.; Kraiselburd, E.; Villinger, F. IL-12/GM-CSF coadministration in an SIV DNA prime/protein boost protocol enhances Gag-specific T cells but not virus-specific neutralizing antibodies in rhesus macaques. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2003, 19, 883–890. [Google Scholar]
  98. Hellerstein, M.; Xu, Y.; Marino, T.; Lu, S.; Yi, H.; Wright, E.R.; Robinson, H.L. Co-expression of HIV-1 virus-like particles and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor by GEO-D03 DNA vaccine. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2012, 8, 1654–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Belisle, S.E.; Yin, J.; Shedlock, D.J.; Dai, A.; Yan, J.; Hirao, L.; Kutzler, M.A.; Lewis, M.G.; Andersen, H.; Lank, S.M.; et al. Long-term programming of antigen-specific immunityfrom gene expression signatures in the PBMC of rhesus macaques immunized with an SIV DNA vaccine. PLoS One 2011, 6, e19681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ihata, A.; Watabe, S.; Sasaki, S.; Shirai, A.; Fukushima, J.; Hamajima, K.; Inoue, J.; Okuda, K. Immunomodulatory effect of a plasmid expressing CD40 ligand on DNA vaccination against human immunodeficiency virus type-1. Immunology 1999, 98, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, J.; Yu, Q.; Stone, G.W.; Yue, F.Y.; Ngai, N.; Jones, R.B.; Kornbluth, R.S.; Ostrowski, M.A. CD40L expressed from the canarypox vector, ALVAC, can boost immunogenicity of HIV-1 canarypox vaccine in mice and enhance the in vitro expansion of viral specific CD8+ T cell memory responses from HIV-1-infected and HIV-1-uninfected individuals. Vaccine 2008, 26, 4062–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Franco, D.; Liu, W.; Gardiner, D.F.; Hahn, B.H.; Ho, D.D. CD40L-containing virus-like particle as a candidate HIV-1 vaccine targeting dendritic cells. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2011, 56, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wang, S.W.; Bertley, F.M.; Kozlowski, P.A.; Herrmann, L.; Manson, K.; Mazzara, G.; Piatak, M.; Johnson, R.P.; Carville, A.; Mansfield, K.; et al. An SHIV DNA/MVA rectal vaccination in macaques provides systemic and mucosal virus-specific responses and protection against AIDS. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2004, 20, 846–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Winstone, N.; Wilson, A.J.; Morrow, G.; Boggiano, C.; Chiuchiolo, M.J.; Lopez, M.; Kemelman, M.; Ginsberg, A.A.; Mullen, K.; Coleman, J.W.; et al. Enhanced control of pathogenic SIVmac239 replication in macaques immunized with a plasmid IL12 and a DNA prime, viral vector boost vaccine regimen. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 9578–9587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kalams, S.A.; Parker, S.; Jin, X.; Elizaga, M.; Metch, B.; Wang, M.; Hural, J.; Lubeck, M.; Eldridge, J.; Cardinali, M.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an HIV-1 gag DNA vaccine with or without IL-12 and/or IL-15 plasmid cytokine adjuvant in healthy, HIV-1 uninfected adults. PLoS One 2012, 7, e29231. [Google Scholar]
  106. Kalams, S.A.; Parker, S.D.; Elizaga, M.; Metch, B.; Edupuganti, S.; Hural, J.; de Rosa, S.; Carter, D.K.; Rybczyk, K.; Frank, I.; et al. Safety and comparative immunogenicity of an HIV-1 DNA vaccine in combination with plasmid interleukin 12 and impact of intramuscular electroporation for delivery. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 818–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tavel, J.A.; Martin, J.E.; Kelly, G.G.; Enama, M.E.; Shen, J.M.; Gomez, P.L.; Andrews, C.A.; Koup, R.A.; Bailer, R.T.; Stein, J.A.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a Gag-Pol candidate HIV-1 DNA vaccine administered by a needle-free device in HIV-1-seronegative subjects. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2007, 44, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, Z.; Troilo, P.J.; Wang, X.; Griffiths, T.G.; Pacchione, S.J.; Barnum, A.B.; Harper, L.B.; Pauley, C.J.; Niu, Z.; Denisova, L.; et al. Detection of integration of plasmid DNA into host genomic DNA following intramuscular injection and electroporation. Gene Ther. 2004, 11, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Graham, B.S.; Koup, R.A.; Roederer, M.; Bailer, R.T.; Enama, M.E.; Moodie, Z.; Martin, J.E.; McCluskey, M.M.; Chakrabarti, B.K.; Lamoreaux, L.; et al. Phase 1 safety and immunogenicity evaluation of a multiclade HIV-1 DNA candidate vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 194, 1650–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mwau, M.; Cebere, I.; Sutton, J.; Chikoti, P.; Winstone, N.; Wee, E.G.; Beattie, T.; Chen, Y.H.; Dorrell, L.; McShane, H.; et al. A human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) clade A vaccine in clinical trials: Stimulation of HIV-specific T-cell responses by DNA and recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vaccines in humans. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bansal, A.; Jackson, B.; West, K.; Wang, S.; Lu, S.; Kennedy, J.S.; Goepfert, P.A. MultifunctionalT-cell characteristics induced by a polyvalent DNA prime/protein boost human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine regimen given to healthy adults are dependent on the route and dose of administration. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 6458–6469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jaoko, W.; Nakwagala, F.N.; Anzala, O.; Manyonyi, G.O.; Birungi, J.; Nanvubya, A.; Bashir, F.; Bhatt, K.; Ogutu, H.; Wakasiaka, S.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of recombinant low-dosage HIV-1 A vaccine candidates vectored by plasmid pTHr DNA or modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) in humans in East Africa. Vaccine 2008, 26, 2788–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wilson, C.C.; Newman, M.J.; Livingston, B.D.; MaWhinney, S.; Forster, J.E.; Scott, J.; Schooley, R.T.; Benson, C.A. Clinical phase 1 testing of the safety and immunogenicity of an epitope-based DNA vaccine in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2008, 15, 986–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, S.; Kennedy, J.S.; West, K.; Montefiori, D.C.; Coley, S.; Lawrence, J.; Shen, S.; Green, S.; Rothman, A.L.; Ennis, F.A.; et al. Cross-subtype antibody and cellular immune responses induced by a polyvalent DNA prime-protein boost HIV-1 vaccine in healthy human volunteers. Vaccine 2008, 26, 1098–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Gorse, G.J.; Baden, L.R.; Wecker, M.; Newman, M.J.; Ferrari, G.; Weinhold, K.J.; Livingston, B.D.; Villafana, T.L.; Li, H.; Noonan, E.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte poly-epitope, DNA plasmid (EP HIV-1090) vaccine in healthy, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-uninfected adults. Vaccine 2008, 26, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Eller, M.A.; Eller, L.A.; Opollo, M.S.; Ouma, B.J.; Oballah, P.O.; Galley, L.; Karnasuta, C.; Kim, S.R.; Robb, M.L.; Michael, N.L.; et al. Induction of HIV-specific functional immune responses by a multiclade HIV-1 DNA vaccine candidate in healthy Ugandans. Vaccine 2007, 25, 7737–7742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Catanzaro, A.T.; Roederer, M.; Koup, R.A.; Bailer, R.T.; Enama, M.E.; Nason, M.C.; Martin, J.E.; Rucker, S.; Andrews, C.A.; Gomez, P.L.; et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of a six-plasmid multiclade HIV-1 DNA candidate vaccine. Vaccine 2007, 25, 4085–4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kutzler, M.A.; Weiner, D.B. DNA vaccines: Ready for prime time? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 776–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Vasan, S.; Hurley, A.; Schlesinger, S.J.; Hannaman, D.; Gardiner, D.F.; Dugin, D.P.; Boente-Carrera, M.; Vittorino, R.; Caskey, M.; Andersen, J.; et al. In vivo electroporation enhances the immunogenicity of an HIV-1 DNA vaccine candidate in healthy volunteers. PLoS One 2011, 6, e19252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  120. Cristillo, A.D.; Weiss, D.; Hudacik, L.; Restrepo, S.; Galmin, L.; Suschak, J.; Draghia-Akli, R.; Markham, P.; Pal, R. Persistent antibody and T cell responses induced by HIV-1 DNA vaccine delivered by electroporation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 366, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kulkarni, V.; Rosati, M.; Bear, J.; Pilkington, G.R.; Jalah, R.; Bergamaschi, C.; Singh, A.K.; Alicea, C.; Chowdhury, B.; Zhang, G.-M.; et al. Comparison of intradermal and intramuscular delivery of SIV env DNA by in vivo electroporation in macaques. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2013, 9, 2081–2094. [Google Scholar]
  122. Kulkarni, V.; Rosati, M.; Jalah, R.; Ganneru, B.; Alicea, C.; Yu, L.; Guan, Y.; LaBranche, C.; Montefiori, D.C.; King, A.D.; et al. DNA vaccination by intradermal electroporation induces long-lasting immune responses in Rhesus macaques. J. Med. Primatol. in press.
  123. Lichterfeld, M.; Yu, X.G.; le Gall, S.; Altfeld, M. Immunodominance of HIV-1-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in acute HIV-1 infection: At the crossroads of viral and host genetics. Trends Immunol. 2005, 26, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Friedrich, T.C.; Valentine, L.E.; Yant, L.J.; Rakasz, E.G.; Piaskowski, S.M.; Furlott, J.R.; Weisgrau, K.L.; Burwitz, B.; May, G.E.; Leon, E.J.; et al. Subdominant CD8+ T-cell responses are involved in durable control of AIDS virus replication. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 3465–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Liu, Y.; McNevin, J.; Rolland, M.; Zhao, H.; Deng, W.; Maenza, J.; Stevens, C.E.; Collier, A.C.; McElrath, M.J.; Mullins, J.I. Conserved HIV-1 epitopes continuously elicit subdominant cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 200, 1825–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Liu, J.; Ewald, B.A.; Lynch, D.M.; Nanda, A.; Sumida, S.M.; Barouch, D.H. Modulation of DNA vaccine-elicited CD8+ T-lymphocyte epitope immunodominance hierarchies. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 11991–11997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Frahm, N.; Kiepiela, P.; Adams, S.; Linde, C.H.; Hewitt, H.S.; Sango, K.; Feeney, M.E.; Addo, M.M.; Lichterfeld, M.; Lahaie, M.P.; et al. Control of human immunodeficiency virus replication by cytotoxic T lymphocytes targeting subdominant epitopes. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bockl, K.; Wild, J.; Bredl, S.; Kindsmuller, K.; Kostler, J.; Wagner, R. Altering an artificial gagpolnef polyprotein and mode of env co-administration affects the immunogenicity of a clade C HIV DNA vaccine. PLoS One 2012, 7, e34723. [Google Scholar]
  129. Iversen, A.K.; Stewart-Jones, G.; Learn, G.H.; Christie, N.; Sylvester-Hviid, C.; Armitage, A.E.; Kaul, R.; Beattie, T.; Lee, J.K.; Li, Y.; et al. Conflicting selective forces affect T cell receptor contacts in an immunodominant human immunodeficiency virus epitope. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Schneidewind, A.; Brumme, Z.L.; Brumme, C.J.; Power, K.A.; Reyor, L.L.; O’Sullivan, K.; Gladden, A.; Hempel, U.; Kuntzen, T.; Wang, Y.E.; et al. Transmission and long-term stability of compensated CD8 escape mutations. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 3993–3997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Altfeld, M.; Kalife, E.T.; Qi, Y.; Streeck, H.; Lichterfeld, M.; Johnston, M.N.; Burgett, N.; Swartz, M.E.; Yang, A.; Alter, G.; et al. HLA alleles associated with delayed progression to AIDS contribute strongly to the initial CD8+ T cell response against HIV-1. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Friedrich, D.; Jalbert, E.; Dinges, W.L.; Sidney, J.; Sette, A.; Huang, Y.; McElrath, M.J.; Horton, H. Vaccine-induced HIV-specific CD8+ T cells utilize preferential HLA alleles and target-specific regions of HIV-1. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2011, 58, 248–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Maurer, K.; Harrer, E.G.; Goldwich, A.; Eismann, K.; Bergmann, S.; Schmitt-Haendle, M.; Spriewald, B.; Mueller, S.M.; Harrer, T. Role of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-mediated immune selection in a dominant human leukocyte antigen-B8-restricted cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope in Nef. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2008, 48, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Li, F.; Finnefrock, A.C.; Dubey, S.A.; Korber, B.T.; Szinger, J.; Cole, S.; McElrath, M.J.; Shiver, J.W.; Casimiro, D.R.; Corey, L.; et al. Mapping HIV-1 vaccine induced T-cell responses: Bias towards less-conserved regions and potential impact on vaccine efficacy in the step study. PLoS One 2011, 6, e20479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Nickle, D.C.; Rolland, M.; Jensen, M.A.; Pond, S.L.; Deng, W.; Seligman, M.; Heckerman, D.; Mullins, J.I.; Jojic, N. Coping with viral diversity in HIV vaccine design. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3, e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Nickle, D.C.; Jojic, N.; Heckerman, D.; Jojic, V.; Kirovski, D.; Rolland, M.; Pond, S.K.; Mullins, J.I. Comparison of immunogen designs that optimize peptide coverage: Reply to Fischer et al. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4, e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Barouch, D.H.; O’Brien, K.L.; Simmons, N.L.; King, S.L.; Abbink, P.; Maxfield, L.F.; Sun, Y.H.; la Porte, A.; Riggs, A.M.; Lynch, D.M.; et al. Mosaic HIV-1 vaccines expand the breadth and depth of cellular immune responses in rhesus monkeys. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Santra, S.; Liao, H.X.; Zhang, R.; Muldoon, M.; Watson, S.; Fischer, W.; Theiler, J.; Szinger, J.; Balachandran, H.; Buzby, A.; et al. Mosaic vaccines elicit CD8+ T lymphocyte responses that confer enhanced immune coverage of diverse HIV strains in monkeys. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Fischer, W.; Perkins, S.; Theiler, J.; Bhattacharya, T.; Yusim, K.; Funkhouser, R.; Kuiken, C.; Haynes, B.; Letvin, N.L.; Walker, B.D.; et al. Polyvalent vaccines for optimal coverage of potential T-cell epitopes in global HIV-1 variants. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Fischer, W.; Liao, H.X.; Haynes, B.F.; Letvin, N.L.; Korber, B. Coping with viral diversity in HIV vaccine design: A response to Nickle et al. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4, e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Doria-Rose, N.A.; Learn, G.H.; Rodrigo, A.G.; Nickle, D.C.; Li, F.; Mahalanabis, M.; Hensel, M.T.; McLaughlin, S.; Edmonson, P.F.; Montefiori, D.; et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype B ancestral envelope protein is functional and elicits neutralizing antibodies in rabbits similar to those elicited by a circulating subtype B envelope. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 11214–11224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mullins, J.I.; Nickle, D.C.; Heath, L.; Rodrigo, A.G.; Learn, G.H. Immunogen sequence: The fourth tier of AIDS vaccine design. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2004, 3, S151–S159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Nickle, D.C.; Jensen, M.A.; Gottlieb, G.S.; Shriner, D.; Learn, G.H.; Rodrigo, A.G.; Mullins, J.I. Consensus and ancestral state HIV vaccines. Science 2003, 299, 1515–1518. [Google Scholar]
  144. Dahirel, V.; Shekhar, K.; Pereyra, F.; Miura, T.; Artyomov, M.; Talsania, S.; Allen, T.M.; Altfeld, M.; Carrington, M.; Irvine, D.J.; et al. Coordinate linkage of HIV evolution reveals regions of immunological vulnerability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 11530–11535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Letourneau, S.; Im, E.J.; Mashishi, T.; Brereton, C.; Bridgeman, A.; Yang, H.; Dorrell, L.; Dong, T.; Korber, B.; McMichael, A.J.; et al. Design and pre-clinical evaluation of a universal HIV-1 vaccine. PLoS One 2007, 2, e984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Rosario, M.; Bridgeman, A.; Quakkelaar, E.D.; Quigley, M.F.; Hill, B.J.; Knudsen, M.L.; Ammendola, V.; Ljungberg, K.; Borthwick, N.; Im, E.J.; et al. Long peptides induce polyfunctional T cells against conserved regions of HIV-1 with superior breadth to single-gene vaccines in macaques. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010, 40, 1973–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. De Groot, A.S.; Rivera, D.S.; McMurry, J.A.; Buus, S.; Martin, W. Identification of immunogenic HLA-B7 “Achilles’ heel” epitopes within highly conserved regions of HIV. Vaccine 2008, 26, 3059–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wilson, C.C.; McKinney, D.; Anders, M.; MaWhinney, S.; Forster, J.; Crimi, C.; Southwood, S.; Sette, A.; Chesnut, R.; Newman, M.J.; et al. Development of a DNA vaccine designed to induce cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to multiple conserved epitopes in HIV-1. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 5611–5623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kaufman, D.R.; Li, F.; Cruz, A.N.; Self, S.G.; Barouch, D.H. Focus and breadth of cellular immune responses elicited by a heterologous insert prime-boost vaccine regimen in rhesus monkeys. Vaccine 2012, 30, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Rosa, D.S.; Ribeiro, S.P.; Cunha-Neto, E. CD4+ T cell epitope discovery and rational vaccine design. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2010, 58, 121–130. [Google Scholar]
  151. Ribeiro, S.P.; Rosa, D.S.; Fonseca, S.G.; Mairena, E.C.; Postol, E.; Oliveira, S.C.; Guilherme, L.; Kalil, J.; Cunha-Neto, E. A vaccine encoding conserved promiscuous HIV CD4 epitopes induces broad T cell responses in mice transgenic to multiple common HLA class II molecules. PLoS One 2010, 5, e11072. [Google Scholar]
  152. Almeida, R.R.; Rosa, D.S.; Ribeiro, S.P.; Santana, V.C.; Kallas, E.G.; Sidney, J.; Sette, A.; Kalil, J.; Cunha-Neto, E. Broad and cross-clade CD4+ T-cell responses elicited by a DNA vaccine encoding highly conserved and promiscuous HIV-1 M-group consensus peptides. PLoS One 2012, 7, e45267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  153. Kulkarni, V.; Valentin, A.; Rosati, M.; Alicea, C.; Singh, A.K.; Jalah, R.; Broderick, K.E.; Sardesai, N.Y.; le Gall, S.; Mothe, B.; et al. Altered immunodominance hierarchy and increased T-cell breadth upon HIV-1 conserved element DNA vaccination in macaques. PLoS One 2014, 9, e86254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Hanke, T. Conserved immunogens in prime-boost strategies for the next-generation HIV-1 vaccines. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2014, 14, 601–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Mothe, B.; Llano, A.; Ibarrondo, J.; Zamarreno, J.; Schiaulini, M.; Miranda, C.; Ruiz-Riol, M.; Berger, C.T.; Herrero, M.J.; Palou, E.; et al. CTL responses of high functional avidity and broad variant cross-reactivity are associated with HIV control. PLoS One 2012, 7, e29717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Rolland, M.; Nickle, D.C.; Mullins, J.I. HIV-1 group M conserved elements vaccine. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, e157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kulkarni, V.; Valentin, A.; Rosati, M.; Rolland, M.; Mullins, J.I.; Pavlakis, G.N.; Felber, B.K.; Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD, USA. Unpublished work. 2014.
  158. Kopycinski, J.; Cheeseman, H.; Ashraf, A.; Gill, D.; Hayes, P.; Hannaman, D.; Gilmour, J.; Cox, J.H.; Vasan, S. A DNA-based candidate HIV vaccine delivered via in vivo electroporation induces CD4 responses toward the α4β7-binding V2 loop of HIV gp120 in healthy volunteers. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2012, 19, 1557–1559. [Google Scholar]
  159. Kennedy, J.S.; Co, M.; Green, S.; Longtine, K.; Longtine, J.; O’Neill, M.A.; Adams, J.P.; Rothman, A.L.; Yu, Q.; Johnson-Leva, R.; et al. The safety and tolerability of an HIV-1 DNA prime-protein boost vaccine (DP6–001) in healthy adult volunteers. Vaccine 2008, 26, 4420–4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Goepfert, P.A.; Elizaga, M.L.; Sato, A.; Qin, L.; Cardinali, M.; Hay, C.M.; Hural, J.; DeRosa, S.C.; DeFawe, O.D.; Tomaras, G.D.; et al. Phase 1 safety and immunogenicity testing of DNA and recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara vaccines expressing HIV-1 virus-like particles. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Hayes, P.; Gilmour, J.; von Lieven, A.; Gill, D.; Clark, L.; Kopycinski, J.; Cheeseman, H.; Chung, A.; Alter, G.; Dally, L.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of DNA prime and modified vaccinia ankara virus-HIV subtype C vaccine boost in healthy adults. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2013, 20, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Gudmundsdotter, L.; Nilsson, C.; Brave, A.; Hejdeman, B.; Earl, P.; Moss, B.; Robb, M.; Cox, J.; Michael, N.; Marovich, M.; et al. Recombinant Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) effectively boosts DNA-primed HIV-specific immune responses in humans despite pre-existing vaccinia immunity. Vaccine 2009, 27, 4468–4474. [Google Scholar]
  163. Sandstrom, E.; Nilsson, C.; Hejdeman, B.; Brave, A.; Bratt, G.; Robb, M.; Cox, J.; Vancott, T.; Marovich, M.; Stout, R.; et al. Broad immunogenicity of a multigene, multiclade HIV-1 DNA vaccine boosted with heterologous HIV-1 recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 198, 1482–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Bakari, M.; Aboud, S.; Nilsson, C.; Francis, J.; Buma, D.; Moshiro, C.; Aris, E.A.; Lyamuya, E.F.; Janabi, M.; Godoy-Ramirez, K.; et al. Broad and potent immune responses to a low dose intradermal HIV-1 DNA boosted with HIV-1 recombinant MVA among healthy adults in Tanzania. Vaccine 2011, 29, 8417–8428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Borthwick, N.; Ahmed, T.; Ondondo, B.; Hayes, P.; Rose, A.; Ebrahimsa, U.; Hayton, E.J.; Black, A.; Bridgeman, A.; Rosario, M.; et al. Vaccine-elicited human T cells recognizing conserved protein regions Inhibit HIV-1. Mol. Ther. 2014, 22, 464–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Li, J.; Valentin, A.; Kulkarni, V.; Rosati, M.; Beach, R.K.; Alicea, C.; Bear, J.; Hannaman, D.; Reed, S.G.; Felber, B.K.; et al. HIV/SIV DNA vaccine combined with protein in a co-immunization protocol elicits highest humoral responses to envelope in mice and macaques. Vaccine 2013, 31, 3747–3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Jaworski, J.P.; Krebs, S.J.; Trovato, M.; Kovarik, D.N.; Brower, Z.; Sutton, W.F.; Waagmeester, G.; Sartorius, R.; D’Apice, L.; Caivano, A.; et al. Co-immunization with multimeric scaffolds and DNA rapidly induces potent autologous HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies and CD8+ T cells. PLoS One 2012, 7, e31464. [Google Scholar]
  168. Vargas-Inchaustegui, D.A.; Tuero, I.; Mohanram, V.; Musich, T.; Pegu, P.; Valentin, A.; Sui, Y.; Rosati, M.; Bear, J.; Kulkarni, V.; et al. Humoral immunity induced by mucosal and/or systemic SIV-specific vaccine platforms suggest novel combinatorial approaches for enhancing responses. Clin. Immunol. submitted for publication. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  169. Boyer, J.D.; Robinson, T.M.; Kutzler, M.A.; Vansant, G.; Hokey, D.A.; Kumar, S.; Parkinson, R.; Wu, L.; Sidhu, M.K.; Pavlakis, G.N.; et al. Protection against simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 89.6P in macaques after coimmunization with SHIV antigen and IL-15 plasmid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 18648–18653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Muthumani, K.; Bagarazzi, M.; Conway, D.; Hwang, D.S.; Manson, K.; Ciccarelli, R.; Israel, Z.; Montefiori, D.C.; Ugen, K.; Miller, N.; et al. A Gag-Pol/Env-Rev SIV239 DNA vaccine improves CD4 counts, and reduce viral loads after pathogenic intrarectal SIV(mac)251 challenge in rhesus macaques. Vaccine 2003, 21, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Boyer, J.D.; Maciag, P.C.; Parkinson, R.; Wu, L.; Lewis, M.G.; Weiner, D.B.; Paterson, Y. Rhesus macaques with high levels of vaccine induced IFN-gamma producing cells better control viral set-point following challenge with SIV239. Vaccine 2006, 24, 4498–4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Haigwood, N.L.; Pierce, C.C.; Robertson, M.N.; Watson, A.J.; Montefiori, D.C.; Rabin, M.; Lynch, J.B.; Kuller, L.; Thompson, J.; Morton, W.R.; et al. Protection from pathogenic SIV challenge using multigenic DNA vaccines. Immunol. Lett. 1999, 66, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Yin, J.; Dai, A.; Lecureux, J.; Arango, T.; Kutzler, M.A.; Yan, J.; Lewis, M.G.; Khan, A.; Sardesai, N.Y.; Montefiore, D.; et al. High antibody and cellular responses induced to HIV-1 clade C envelope following DNA vaccines delivered by electroporation. Vaccine 2011, 29, 6763–6770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Von Gegerfelt, A.S.; Alicea, C.; Valentin, A.; Morrow, M.; van Rompay, K.K.; Ayash-Rashkovsky, M.; Markham, P.; Else, J.G.; Marthas, M.L.; Pavlakis, G.N.; et al. Long lasting control and lack of pathogenicity of the attenuated Rev-independent SIV in rhesus macaques. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2006, 22, 516–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Pal, R.; Wang, S.; Kalyanaraman, V.S.; Nair, B.C.; Whitney, S.; Keen, T.; Hocker, L.; Hudacik, L.; Rose, N.; Cristillo, A.; et al. Polyvalent DNA prime and envelope protein boost HIV-1 vaccine elicits humoral and cellular responses and controls plasma viremia in rhesus macaques following rectal challenge with an R5 SHIV isolate. J. Med. Primatol. 2005, 34, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Pal, R.; Kalyanaraman, V.S.; Nair, B.C.; Whitney, S.; Keen, T.; Hocker, L.; Hudacik, L.; Rose, N.; Mboudjeka, I.; Shen, S.; et al. Immunization of rhesus macaques with a polyvalent DNA prime/protein boost human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine elicits protective antibody response against simian human immunodeficiency virus of R5 phenotype. Virology 2006, 348, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Rasmussen, R.A.; Hofmann-Lehman, R.; Montefiori, D.C.; Li, P.L.; Liska, V.; Vlasak, J.; Baba, T.W.; Schmitz, J.E.; Kuroda, M.J.; Robinson, H.L.; et al. DNA prime/protein boost vaccine strategy in neonatal macaques against simian human immunodeficiency virus. J. Med. Primatol. 2002, 31, 40–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Koopman, G.; Mortier, D.; Hofman, S.; Mathy, N.; Koutsoukos, M.; Ertl, P.; Overend, P.; van Wely, C.; Thomsen, L.L.; Wahren, B.; et al. Immune-response profiles induced by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine DNA, protein or mixed-modality immunization: Increased protection from pathogenic simian-human immunodeficiency virus viraemia with protein/DNA combination. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 540–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Hel, Z.; Nacsa, J.; Tryniszewska, E.; Tsai, W.P.; Parks, R.W.; Montefiori, D.C.; Felber, B.K.; Tartaglia, J.; Pavlakis, G.N.; Franchini, G. Containment of simian immunodeficiency virus infection in vaccinated macaques: Correlation with the magnitude of virus-specific pre- and postchallenge CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 4778–4787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hel, Z.; Tsai, W.P.; Thornton, A.; Nacsa, J.; Giuliani, L.; Tryniszewska, E.; Poudyal, M.; Venzon, D.; Wang, X.; Altman, J.; et al. Potentiation of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses by a DNA-SIV and NYVAC-SIV prime/boost regimen. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 7180–7191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Hel, Z.; Tsai, W.P.; Tryniszewska, E.; Nacsa, J.; Markham, P.D.; Lewis, M.G.; Pavlakis, G.N.; Felber, B.K.; Tartaglia, J.; Franchini, G. Improved vaccine protection from simian AIDS by the addition of nonstructural simian immunodeficiency virus genes. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Hutnick, N.A.; Myles, D.J.; Hirao, L.; Scott, V.L.; Ferraro, B.; Khan, A.S.; Lewis, M.G.; Miller, C.J.; Bett, A.J.; Casimiro, D.; et al. An optimized SIV DNA vaccine can serve as a boost for Ad5 and provide partial protection from a high-dose SIVmac251 challenge. Vaccine 2012, 30, 3202–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Wilson, N.A.; Keele, B.F.; Reed, J.S.; Piaskowski, S.M.; MacNair, C.E.; Bett, A.J.; Liang, X.; Wang, F.; Thoryk, E.; Heidecker, G.J.; et al. Vaccine-induced cellular responses control simian immunodeficiency virus replication after heterologous challenge. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 6508–6521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Casimiro, D.R.; Wang, F.; Schleif, W.A.; Liang, X.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Tobery, T.W.; Davies, M.E.; McDermott, A.B.; O’Connor, D.H.; Fridman, A.; et al. Attenuation of simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239 infection by prophylactic immunization with dna and recombinant adenoviral vaccine vectors expressing Gag. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 15547–15555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Wilson, N.A.; Reed, J.; Napoe, G.S.; Piaskowski, S.; Szymanski, A.; Furlott, J.; Gonzalez, E.J.; Yant, L.J.; Maness, N.J.; May, G.E.; et al. Vaccine-induced cellular immune responses reduce plasma viral concentrations after repeated low-dose challenge with pathogenic simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 5875–5885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Suh, Y.S.; Park, K.S.; Sauermann, U.; Franz, M.; Norley, S.; Wilfingseder, D.; Stoiber, H.; Fagrouch, Z.; Heeney, J.; Hunsmann, G.; et al. Reduction of viral loads by multigenic DNA priming and adenovirus boosting in the SIVmac-macaque model. Vaccine 2006, 24, 1811–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Liu, J.; Ewald, B.A.; Lynch, D.M.; Denholtz, M.; Abbink, P.; Lemckert, A.A.; Carville, A.; Mansfield, K.G.; Havenga, M.J.; Goudsmit, J.; et al. Magnitude and phenotype of cellular immune responses elicited by recombinant adenovirus vectors and heterologous prime-boost regimens in rhesus monkeys. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 4844–4852. [Google Scholar]
  188. Mattapallil, J.J.; Douek, D.C.; Buckler-White, A.; Montefiori, D.; Letvin, N.L.; Nabel, G.J.; Roederer, M. Vaccination preserves CD4 memory T cells during acute simian immunodeficiency virus challenge. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 1533–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Mattapallil, J.J.; Hill, B.; Douek, D.C.; Roederer, M. Systemic vaccination prevents the total destruction of mucosal CD4 T cells during acute SIV challenge. J. Med. Primatol. 2006, 35, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Letvin, N.L.; Huang, Y.; Chakrabarti, B.K.; Xu, L.; Seaman, M.S.; Beaudry, K.; Korioth-Schmitz, B.; Yu, F.; Rohne, D.; Martin, K.L.; et al. Heterologous envelope immunogens contribute to AIDS vaccine protection in rhesus monkeys. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 7490–7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Seaman, M.S.; Santra, S.; Newberg, M.H.; Philippon, V.; Manson, K.; Xu, L.; Gelman, R.S.; Panicali, D.; Mascola, J.R.; Nabel, G.J.; et al. Vaccine-elicited memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes contribute to Mamu-A*01-associated control of simian/human immunodeficiency virus 89.6P replication in rhesus monkeys. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 4580–4588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Sun, Y.; Schmitz, J.E.; Buzby, A.P.; Barker, B.R.; Rao, S.S.; Xu, L.; Yang, Z.Y.; Mascola, J.R.; Nabel, G.J.; Letvin, N.L. Virus-specific cellular immune correlates of survival in vaccinated monkeys after simian immunodeficiency virus challenge. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 10950–10956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Yamamoto, T.; Johnson, M.J.; Price, D.A.; Wolinsky, D.I.; Almeida, J.R.; Petrovas, C.; Nason, M.; Yeh, W.W.; Shen, L.; Roederer, M.; et al. Virus inhibition activity of effector memory CD8+ T cells determines simian immunodeficiency virus load in vaccinated monkeys after vaccine breakthrough infection. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 5877–5884. [Google Scholar]
  194. Letvin, N.L.; Rao, S.S.; Montefiori, D.C.; Seaman, M.S.; Sun, Y.; Lim, S.Y.; Yeh, W.W.; Asmal, M.; Gelman, R.S.; Shen, L.; et al. Immune and genetic correlates of vaccine protection against mucosal infection by SIV in monkeys. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Koup, R.A.; Roederer, M.; Lamoreaux, L.; Fischer, J.; Novik, L.; Nason, M.C.; Larkin, B.D.; Enama, M.E.; Ledgerwood, J.E.; Bailer, R.T.; et al. Priming immunization with DNA augments immunogenicity of recombinant adenoviral vectors for both HIV-1 specific antibody and T-cell responses. PLoS One 2010, 5, e9015. [Google Scholar]
  196. Kaur, A.; Sanford, H.B.; Garry, D.; Lang, S.; Klumpp, S.A.; Watanabe, D.; Bronson, R.T.; Lifson, J.D.; Rosati, M.; Pavlakis, G.N.; et al. Ability of herpes simplex virus vectors to boost immune responses to DNA vectors and to protect against challenge by simian immunodeficiency virus. Virology 2007, 357, 199–214. [Google Scholar]
  197. Earl, P.L.; Wyatt, L.S.; Montefiori, D.C.; Bilska, M.; Woodward, R.; Markham, P.D.; Malley, J.D.; Vogel, T.U.; Allen, T.M.; Watkins, D.I.; et al. Comparison of vaccine strategies using recombinant env-gag-pol MVA with or without an oligomeric Env protein boost in the SHIV rhesus macaque model. Virology 2002, 294, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Amara, R.R.; Patel, K.; Niedziela, G.; Nigam, P.; Sharma, S.; Staprans, S.I.; Montefiori, D.C.; Chenareddi, L.; Herndon, J.G.; Robinson, H.L.; et al. A combination DNA and attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus vaccine strategy provides enhanced protection from simian/human immunodeficiency virus-induced disease. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 15356–15367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Robinson, H.L.; Montefiori, D.C.; Villinger, F.; Robinson, J.E.; Sharma, S.; Wyatt, L.S.; Earl, P.L.; McClure, H.M.; Moss, B.; Amara, R.R. Studies on GM-CSF DNA as an adjuvant for neutralizing Ab elicited by a DNA/MVA immunodeficiency virus vaccine. Virology 2006, 352, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Zhao, J.; Lai, L.; Amara, R.R.; Montefiori, D.C.; Villinger, F.; Chennareddi, L.; Wyatt, L.S.; Moss, B.; Robinson, H.L. Preclinical studies of human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS vaccines: Inverse correlation between avidity of anti-Env antibodies and peak postchallenge viremia. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 4102–4111. [Google Scholar]
  201. Barouch, D.H.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Maxfield, L.F.; Abbink, P.; Lynch, D.M.; Iampietro, M.J.; SanMiguel, A.; Seaman, M.S.; Ferrari, G.; et al. Vaccine protection against acquisition of neutralization-resistant SIV challenges in rhesus monkeys. Nature 2012, 482, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Vaccari, M.; Boasso, A.; Ma, Z.M.; Cecchinato, V.; Venzon, D.; Doster, M.N.; Tsai, W.P.; Shearer, G.M.; Fuchs, D.; Felber, B.K.; et al. CD4+ T-cell loss and delayed expression of modulators of immune responses at mucosal sites of vaccinated macaques following SIV(mac251) infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2008, 1, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Vaccari, M.; Mattapallil, J.; Song, K.; Tsai, W.P.; Hryniewicz, A.; Venzon, D.; Zanetti, M.; Reimann, K.A.; Roederer, M.; Franchini, G. Reduced protection from simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac251 infection afforded by memory CD8+ T cells induced by vaccination during CD4+ T-cell deficiency. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 9629–9638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Cox, J.H.; Ferrari, M.G.; Earl, P.; Lane, J.R.; Jagodzinski, L.L.; Polonis, V.R.; Kuta, E.G.; Boyer, J.D.; Ratto-Kim, S.; Eller, L.A.; et al. Inclusion of a CRF01_AE HIV envelope protein boost with a DNA/MVA prime-boost vaccine: Impact on humoral and cellular immunogenicity and viral load reduction after SHIV-E challenge. Vaccine 2012, 30, 1830–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Virnik, K.; Hockenbury, M.; Ni, Y.; Beren, J.; Pavlakis, G.N.; Felber, B.K.; Berkower, I. Live attenuated rubella vectors expressing SIV and HIV vaccine antigens replicate and elicit durable immune responses in rhesus macaques. Retrovirology. 2013, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Von Gegerfelt, A.S.; Rosati, M.; Alicea, C.; Valentin, A.; Roth, P.; Bear, J.; Franchini, G.; Albert, P.S.; Bischofberger, N.; Boyer, J.D.; et al. Long-lasting decrease in viremia in macaques chronically infected with simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac251 after therapeutic DNA immunization. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 1972–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Palma, P.; Romiti, M.L.; Montesano, C.; Santilli, V.; Mora, N.; Aquilani, A.; Dispinseri, S.; Tchidjou, H.K.; Montano, M.; Eriksson, L.E.; et al. Therapeutic DNA vaccination of vertically HIV-infected children: Report of the first pediatric randomised trial (PEDVAC). PLoS One 2013, 8, e79957. [Google Scholar]
  208. Rodriguez, B.; Asmuth, D.M.; Matining, R.M.; Spritzler, J.; Jacobson, J.M.; Mailliard, R.B.; Li, X.D.; Martinez, A.I.; Tenorio, A.R.; Lori, F.; et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of repeated doses of dermavir, a candidate therapeutic HIV vaccine, in HIV-infected patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy: Results of the ACTG 5176 trial. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2013, 64, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Casazza, J.P.; Bowman, K.A.; Adzaku, S.; Smith, E.C.; Enama, M.E.; Bailer, R.T.; Price, D.A.; Gostick, E.; Gordon, I.J.; Ambrozak, D.R.; et al. Therapeutic vaccination expands and improves the function of the HIV-specific memory T-cell repertoire. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 207, 1829–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Lisziewicz, J.; Bakare, N.; Calarota, S.A.; Banhegyi, D.; Szlavik, J.; Ujhelyi, E.; Toke, E.R.; Molnar, L.; Lisziewicz, Z.; Autran, B.; et al. Single DermaVir immunization: Dose-dependent expansion of precursor/memory T cells against all HIV antigens in HIV-1 infected individuals. PLoS One 2012, 7, e35416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Carcelain, G.; Autran, B. Immune interventions in HIV infection. Immunol. Rev. 2013, 254, 355–371. [Google Scholar]
  212. Gudmundsdotter, L.; Sjodin, A.; Bostrom, A.C.; Hejdeman, B.; Theve-Palm, R.; Alaeus, A.; Lidman, K.; Wahren, B. Therapeutic immunization for HIV. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 2006, 28, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Felber, B.K.; Valentin, A.; Rosati, M.; Bergamaschi, C.; Pavlakis, G.N. HIV DNA Vaccine: Stepwise Improvements Make a Difference. Vaccines 2014, 2, 354-379. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2020354

AMA Style

Felber BK, Valentin A, Rosati M, Bergamaschi C, Pavlakis GN. HIV DNA Vaccine: Stepwise Improvements Make a Difference. Vaccines. 2014; 2(2):354-379. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2020354

Chicago/Turabian Style

Felber, Barbara K., Antonio Valentin, Margherita Rosati, Cristina Bergamaschi, and George N. Pavlakis. 2014. "HIV DNA Vaccine: Stepwise Improvements Make a Difference" Vaccines 2, no. 2: 354-379. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2020354

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop