1. Introduction
Feline panleukopenia, caused by feline parvovirus (FPV), is a highly contagious and often fatal disease that poses a major threat to feline health [
1]. The clinical presentation typically includes fever, persistent vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, a significant decrease in white blood cell count (leukopenia), and hemorrhagic enteritis. The mortality rate associated with the disease varies depending on the severity of clinical signs, ranging from 25% to as high as 100%. While FPV can affect cats of all ages, kittens are particularly susceptible, with mortality rates exceeding 90% in this age group [
1,
2]. FPV was first identified in domestic cats in the 1920s. Since then, it has been isolated from a wide range of species, including primates, raccoons, and various wild and captive carnivores [
3,
4,
5], highlighting its broad host range.
Among the many strategies for disease prevention and control, vaccination is the most economical and effective strategy for disease prevention and control. The currently licensed FPV vaccines include inactivated vaccines and live attenuated vaccines. The production processes of inactivated and live attenuated vaccines generally involve cultivating large quantities of live viruses, followed by physical or chemical inactivation for inactivated vaccines, or attenuation treatment for live attenuated vaccines. Because the production of live vaccines requires large-scale propagation of viruses, these processes are time-consuming and must be carried out in high-level biosafety facilities to prevent potential infection risks [
6].
Thanks to advances in genetic engineering, virus-like particles (VLPs) have gained recognition as a promising and secure platform for vaccine development against viral infections. VLPs are nanostructures that mimic the size and shape of viruses, adopting icosahedral configurations. These structures are formed by the spontaneous assembly of multiple copies of one or more recombinant viral structural proteins, without including any viral genetic material [
7]. Because of their highly organized and repetitive presentation of antigenic determinants, VLPs effectively stimulate strong antibody-mediated immune responses and potent cellular immune responses mediated by T cells [
8].
FPV (currently classified as Protoparvovirus carnivoran 1) belongs to the family Parvoviridae, subfamily Parvovirinae, genus Protoparvovirus [
9], and has a symmetrical icosahedral structure [
10]. Its genome consists of a linear, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) molecule approximately 5 kb in length, containing two major open reading frames (ORFs). The first open reading frame (initiating at the 5′ end) encodes the non-structural proteins, such as the NS1 protein, which are involved in viral replication. The second open reading frame encodes the structural proteins, including the major capsid proteins VP1 and VP2, which are crucial for the formation of viral particles and host cell infection. VP1 contains the entire sequence of VP2, with an additional N-terminal region of about 140 amino acids. VP2 is the major capsid protein of the virus. During viral maturation, the VP2 protein can be partially cleaved by host proteases to generate the VP3 protein [
4]. The structural protein VP2 is the major capsid protein that determines the antigenicity, pathogenicity, and host infection spectrum of the pathogen [
11], with major epitopes that stimulate the production of neutralizing antibodies and serve as the target antigen for subunit vaccines [
12]. The VP2 proteins of canine parvovirus (CPV) and mink enteritis virus (MEV) of family Parvoviridae are capable of self-assembling into virus-like particles [
13,
14].
In light of the growing global trend of pet ownership and the increasing demand for safe and effective vaccines, the objective of this study was developing a recombinant baculovirus that expresses FPV VP2 and resembles VLPs, and to evaluate the immunogenicity of the FPV VLPs in cats.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Virus and Cell Line
Feline kidney F81 cells were cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in RPMI 1640 medium. This medium was supplemented with 8% fetal bovine serum (FBS, PAN) containing 100 units/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. Both the cultivation of the virulent FPV strain 708 and the serum neutralization test were conducted in F81 cells.
Sf9 insect cells were maintained in suspension in serum-free SF900 Ⅱ medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 27 ± 0.5 °C in spinner flasks at 90~120 rpm. A recombinant baculovirus based on the Autographa California multiple enveloped nuclear polyhedrosisvirus (AcMNPV) was propagated, and FPV VP2 protein expression was carried out in the Sf9 cells.
2.2. Animals
The subjects, 20-week-old Chinese rural cats, including both males and females, free of FPV, feline calicivirus (FCV), feline herpesvirus 1 (FHV-1), feline coronavirus (FCoV) and FPV antibody was less than 1:4, were obtained from a holding facility in Luoyang and were used to evaluate the efficacy of the VLP-based vaccine candidate. The cats were housed under feline panleukopenia virus (FPV)-free conditions throughout the study. All animal samples were collected in accordance with the guidelines approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the National Research Center for Veterinary Medicine (Permit No. 20200725023).
2.3. Antisera
A polyclonal antiserum against FPV was generated by immunizing two 2 kg New Zealand White rabbits with a twice-inactivated FPV vaccine, at a three-week interval between immunizations. Blood samples were collected from the animals on day 28 following the booster immunization, and serum was isolated and stored at −20 °C for use in subsequent experiments.
2.4. Generation of Recombinant Baculovirus
The codon usage of the VP2 gene (GenBank No. MH329286.1) was optimized to align with the codon preference of Sf9 insect cells. For the construction of the recombinant donor plasmid, two copies of the VP2 gene were inserted into the SmaI/SphI and BamHI/HindIII restriction sites of the baculovirus transfer vector pFastBac™ Dual-Hr3. The homologous region 3 (Hr3) was positioned between the pH and p10 promoters to enhance expression efficiency as previously described [
15]. The resulting donor plasmid was transformed into E. coli DH10Bac competent cells containing the AcMNPV bacmid (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), allowing the transposition of the VP2 gene into the bacmid genome to generate a recombinant bacmid. To rescue the recombinant baculovirus, Sf9 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 10
6 cells per well in 6-well plates and transfected with 4 μg of purified bacmid DNA using Cellfectin
® II reagent (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Following three serial passages, the virus titer in the harvested supernatant was determined by plaque assay.
2.5. Identified FPV VP2 Protein Expression
VP2 expression was detected using an indirect fluorescence assay (IFA). Briefly, Sf9 cells were infected with a recombinant baculovirus expressing VP2 proteins, and fixed after 72 h. A rabbit polyclonal antiserum against FPV was used as the primary antibody at a dilution of 1:500, followed by a FITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) as the secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000. Specific fluorescence was observed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) to determine the expression of the VP2 protein.
Sf9 cells were infected with a recombinant baculovirus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1PFU per cell. The cells were harvested 72 h post-infection, washed with PBS, and lysed in a 25 mM bicarbonate solution at 4 °C for 90 min. Cell debris was removed by low-speed centrifugation. The supernatant of cell lysate was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis, followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining and Western blot analysis. For Western blotting, the separated proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose (NC) membrane (BBI). A rabbit polyclonal antiserum against FPV was used as the primary antibody at a dilution of 1:500. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) was used as the secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:2000. After washing with PBST, the membrane was incubated with DAB reagent (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for visualization.
Further characterization was performed using a hemagglutination (HA) test at 4 °C, with a 1% (
v/
v in PBS) suspension of pig erythrocytes, as previously described [
16]. Briefly, the sample was serially two-fold diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 6.5) in a 96-well V-bottom microtiter plate. An equal volume of 1% (
v/
v) pig erythrocytes was added to each well. After gentle mixing, the plate was incubated at 4 °C for 90 min. Hemagglutination was defined as complete agglutination of red blood cells, forming a visible lattice across the well surface. The HA titer was recorded as the reciprocal of the highest dilution showing complete agglutination.
2.6. Purification and Characterization of VLPs
The expression and pretreatment of the VP2 protein were performed as described in
Section 2.5. The cell lysate supernatant was concentrated using an Ultra Filtration Concentrator Tube and applied to a pre-equilibrated gel filtration column HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200-pg (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) for preparative size exclusion chromatography. Peaks corresponding to FPV VP2 were identified by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of the elution fractions.
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a size-exclusion chromatography column (Sepax, SRT SEC-500 PN: 215500-7830, 7.8 × 300 mm, 5 µm) and UV (280 nm) detection. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments were conducted using a DynaPro Light Scattering system (Malvern Panalytical, NANO ZSE) (Wyatt Technology Europe GmbH, Dernbach, Germany). The samples were analyzed at a protein concentration yielding an absorbance of 1.0 at 280 nm. The buffer used in the measurements contained 250 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4)
Purified VLPs were placed onto copper grids and allowed to adhere for 5 min at ambient temperature. Following adsorption, the grids were carefully blotted dry with filter paper and then stained with a 3% phosphotungstic acid (PTA) solution for 5 min. Any surplus liquid was removed by touching the edge of the grid with filter paper. The samples were subsequently analyzed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV (HITACHI HT-7700).
2.7. The Immunity of FPV VLPs
Under aseptic conditions, the purified VLPs (45, 15, and 5 μg per 1.0 mL) were formulated with SEPPIC gel adjuvant and stored at 2–8 °C. Twenty cats were evenly distributed into four experimental groups (as detailed in
Table 1) and immunized by the subcutaneous route. Groups 1, 2, and 3 were immunized with a different VLP vaccine at day 0. Group 4 was inoculated with PBS as the unvaccinated control group. Blood samples were collected at 21 days post-immunization to detect the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody and virus-neutralizing (VN) antibody.
The cats in group 2 and the cats in group 4 were challenged with 1 × 105 50% fluorescent antibody infective dose (FAID50) per 1.0 mL of the virulent FPV strain 708 on day 21 post-immunization. The challenged cats were monitored daily for 10 days.
Anticoagulated blood samples were collected from the cephalic or jugular vein of each cat before challenge and on the 6th day post-challenge. White blood cell (WBC) counts were subsequently determined using a Veterinary Automatic Hematology Analyzer (Mindray, Inc., Shenzhen, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The pre-challenge WBC count was used as the baseline value for each cat. To assess changes in leukocyte levels, the WBC count on day 6 post-challenge was normalized to the corresponding baseline value, and the resulting ratio was defined as the leukocyte ratio.
Intestinal tissues were harvested 10 days after the FPV challenge, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin wax, and sectioned prior to hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E). Monoclonal antibody 4B1 (Luoyang Putai Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Luoyang, China) against FPV VP2 and goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) were used for immunohistochemical (IHC) assays. Stained sections were visualized using a Leica DM2500 microscope (Leica Microsystems).
2.8. Serological Assays
The serum was heat-inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min. The HI antibody titers were analyzed using the previous method [
13]. Briefly, a serial two-fold dilution of inactivated serum samples was mixed with 8 haemagglutination (HA) units of FPV in a 1:1 volume ratio. After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, 1% (
v/
v) pig erythrocytes were added, and the samples were then incubated at 4 °C for a further 90 min. The titer was calculated as the highest dilution at which agglutination was still observed.
The serum was analyzed for FPV neutralizing antibody titers by heat-inactivating it at 56 °C for 30 min, followed by a two-fold serial dilution ranging from 1:2 to 1:2048 according to the previous method [
13]. A 200 FAID
50 dose of FPV was mixed with the serum sample at a volume ratio of 1:1 and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, F81 cells (2 × 10
4 cells/100 μL) were added. After a 5-day incubation at 37 °C with 5% CO
2, antibody titers were measured by IFA and expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution at which infection of the F81 cells was inhibited in 50% of the culture wells.
2.9. Statistics
Prior to conducting group comparisons, Bartlett’s test was performed to assess the assumption of homogeneity of variances across the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers, neutralizing antibody titers, and white blood cell count changes. The results indicated that all p-values were greater than 0.5, suggesting no significant differences in variances among the groups. Therefore, pairwise comparisons were carried out using independent samples t-tests.
Data analysis was conducted using Python (version 3.12.9) with the SciPy package (version 1.13.1). A one-tailed independent t-test was employed to compare each immunization group with its corresponding control group. Fisher’s exact test was utilized to evaluate whether there are statistically significant differences in various clinical symptoms across different groups.
4. Discussion
Virus-like particles (VLPs) represent a promising next-generation vaccine strategy. Structurally similar to native viruses, VLPs are non-infectious due to the absence of viral genetic material, eliminating the risks associated with viral replication and pathogenicity. Their particulate nature and repetitive antigenic structure make them highly effective at stimulating both humoral and cellular immune responses. The advantages of VLP-based vaccines include their strong safety record, high immunogenicity, and adaptability for use in multivalent or cross-protective vaccine designs. Several VLP-based vaccines have already been licensed and successfully implemented in clinical settings, including those targeting human papillomavirus (HPV) and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2). These examples underscore the practicality and effectiveness of this platform in real-world applications.
The baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS) is a powerful tool for the production of recombinant eukaryotic proteins, particularly those requiring post-translational modifications such as glycosylation and phosphorylation. Compared to other commonly used systems—such as bacterial, yeast, and mammalian expression platforms—BEVS offers several key advantages in cost, speed, and ease of use. Insect cell cultures (e.g., Sf9 or Sf21) can be grown at high densities in serum-free media, significantly reducing culture costs compared to mammalian systems. Additionally, the infrastructure required is less complex, making BEVS more accessible and cost-effective. Protein expression typically reaches high levels within 48–72 h after infection, which is faster than many mammalian systems. The system also allows easy optimization through adjustments in multiplicity of infection (MOI), temperature, and harvest time. BEVS is highly flexible and user-friendly, with a wide range of commercial vectors and host cell lines available. It supports the expression of complex proteins, including membrane proteins, virus-like particles (VLPs), and multi-subunit complexes. Moreover, baculoviruses are non-pathogenic to vertebrates, classified under BSL-1, making them safe for routine laboratory use. These features have made the baculovirus expression vector system a popular choice for the production of virus-like particles (VLPs) [
17,
18,
19,
20].
Previous studies have demonstrated that Hr3 enhances the expression of target genes by modulating enhancer activity [
21,
22]. In this study, FPV VP2 protein was expressed using the baculovirus expression system with Hr3. The FPV VP2 protein expressed using a recombinant baculovirus system yielded 0.63 mg/L (estimation of protein expression levels based on quantitation of purified protein), with a hemagglutination (HA) titer of 19log
2, markedly surpassing the HA titer of CPV VP2 protein expressed in silkworm pupae, which was only 9log
2 [
13]. Western blot analysis of the recombinant FPV VP2 protein revealed not only the expected 65 kDa specific band but also several non-specific bands, suggesting possible cross-reactivity with host cell proteins present in the polyclonal antiserum. In addition, the recombinant baculovirus infected Sf9 cells in suspension culture with a particularly high HA titer (19log
2) suitable for large-scale production.
In this study, the VP2 protein expressed by the recombinant baculovirus was purified and characterized using high-performance liquid chromatography with size-exclusion chromatography (HPLC-SEC), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results confirmed the formation of virus-like particles (VLPs), whose size and morphology were consistent with those of the native virus and VLPs reported in previous studies [
23]. However, an additional peak was detected at around 20–21 min during HPLC-SEC analysis, suggesting that the purified protein may still contain some impurities, likely attributable to co-purified host cell proteins or other contaminating substances.
In vaccine research, the application of adjuvants plays a crucial role in enhancing vaccine immunogenicity and protective efficacy. As a commonly used adjuvant, the gel adjuvant has been extensively studied in vaccine development. For instance, Jiao et al. [
23] utilized gel adjuvant to prepare bacterium-like particle vaccines and evaluated their immunogenicity. Therefore, this study also used gel adjuvant to prepare feline parvovirus (FPV) virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine and evaluated its immunogenicity.
HI antibody is considered the gold standard for FPV antibody detection [
24]. HI titers of 1:40 are considered to be protective against FPV infection [
25]. In this study, cats immunized with the recombinant FPV VLPs elicited a strong immune response, with HI antibody titers greater than 10log
2 after immunization with 15 μg FPV VLPs and complete protection after challenge with FPV strain 708. Studies have reported that following immunization with inactivated FPV vaccines, the mean HI antibody titers were only 1:36, whereas the titer could exceed 1:1000 after immunization with attenuated vaccines [
26]. The HI antibody titer induced by the FPV VLP vaccine in this study was comparable to that of the attenuated vaccine. The mean HI antibody titer at 3 weeks post oral immunization with CPV VP2 protein expressed in silkworm pupae was approximately 7log
2 [
13].
The collection of anticoagulated blood samples at 6 days post-challenge was based on the reported clinical course of FPV and CPV infections in cats and dogs. According to previous studies [
27], typical clinical symptoms, including leukopenia (a hallmark of parvovirus infection), generally develop between 4- and 8-days post-infection. Day 6 was selected as a representative time point within this window, when viral-induced immunosuppression and hematological changes are expected to be most pronounced. By collecting samples at this time, we aimed to effectively capture the impact of infection and potentially the protective effects of vaccination on white blood cell counts. This approach is consistent with standard practices in similar experimental infection models, where day 6 post-challenge is often used for assessing immune status and disease progression.
Significant progress has also been made in the application of virus-like particle (VLP) technology in vaccine research. VLPs effectively present and deliver conformational antigens, thereby inducing the adaptive immune response (i.e., cell-mediated and humoral immunity). This study demonstrated that combining VLPs with gel adjuvant can elicit a robust immune response.