Previous Article in Journal
Assessing COVID-19 Infection and Severe Disease Risk in Cancer Patients and Survivors: The Role of Vaccination Status, Circulating Variants, and Comorbidities—A Population-Based Study in Northern Italy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influenza A Vaccine Candidates Based on Virus-like Particles Formed by Coat Proteins of Single-Stranded RNA Phages Beihai32 and PQ465
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Immune Regulation and Disease: Therapeutic Promise for Next-Generation Vaccines

by
Anna M. Timofeeva
*,
Sergey E. Sedykh
and
Georgy A. Nevinsky
SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2025, 13(12), 1224; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13121224
Submission received: 30 October 2025 / Revised: 25 November 2025 / Accepted: 2 December 2025 / Published: 3 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineering in Vaccine Design and Delivery)

Abstract

Background: Antibodies have the unique ability to recognize antigens and to be recognized as antigens by other antibodies, creating a balanced network that regulates the humoral part of the immune system. An antibody that uniquely identifies another antibody of a given specificity as its antigen is referred to as an anti-idiotypic antibody. Methods: A descriptive literature review was conducted using the PubMed database, including publications up to 2025. Results: This review examines the formation mechanisms of anti-idiotypic antibodies, their functional attributes, and their importance in diverse pathologies. A key focus is their capacity to neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies, offering a novel strategy for treating autoimmune diseases. Conversely, the generation of anti-Id Abs against therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (anti-drug antibodies) represents a significant challenge for biologic therapy, a complication addressed in a dedicated section on detection methods. Furthermore, consideration is given to the application of anti-Id Abs as innovative tools for vaccine design, particularly in oncology. By mimicking tumor-associated antigens, anti-Id Abs can induce a potent, targeted immune response against cancer with minimal side effects, presenting an alternative to conventional chemotherapy and radiation. Conclusions: Anti-Id Abs hold significant therapeutic promise. Their ability to selectively suppress pathogenic autoantibodies allows for precise immune intervention without broad immunosuppression. Additionally, their utility extends to vaccine development for various diseases. Further research into anti-Id Abs will deepen our understanding of immune regulation and open new avenues for targeted therapies.

1. Introduction

The immune system is regulated by a complex network of interactions, one of the most intriguing being the ability of antibodies to recognize other antibodies. An antibody that uniquely identifies another antibody of a given specificity as its antigen is referred to as an anti-idiotypic antibody (anti-Id Ab). Experimental and clinical studies have shown that animals and humans are capable of producing anti-Id Abs to their own immunoglobulins [1]. The anti-idiotypic antibody (Ab2) can target different epitopes of the parent antibody (Ab1). The established classification in terms of the binding sites of anti-Id Abs comprises four main classes: Ab2α, Ab2β, Ab2γ, and Ab2ε (Figure 1):
(a)
Ab2α binds outside the Ab1 antigen-binding site.
(b)
Ab2β antibodies bind specifically to the complementarity-determining region (CDR) of Ab1.This allows them to functionally mimic the antigen and directly compete with it for occupancy of the Ab1 binding site.
(c)
Ab2γ binds to the paratope or near the paratope of Ab1, where it sterically occludes antigen access and blocks binding [2,3].
(d)
Ab2ε antibodies demonstrate dual reactivity by recognizing both Ab1 and the cognate antigen itself [4]. Subsequent research has revealed antibodies with expanded polyreactivity that, while similar to Ab2ε, also possess self-binding activity in addition to anti-idiotypic and antigen-binding capabilities [5,6].
Figure 1. Classification of anti-Id Abs according to the location of the paratope and idiotope on Ab1 and Ab2 antibodies. Anti-Id Abs can be categorized into four classes: Ab2α (A), Ab2β (B), Ab2γ (C), and Ab2ε (D).
Figure 1. Classification of anti-Id Abs according to the location of the paratope and idiotope on Ab1 and Ab2 antibodies. Anti-Id Abs can be categorized into four classes: Ab2α (A), Ab2β (B), Ab2γ (C), and Ab2ε (D).
Vaccines 13 01224 g001
Among these classes, Ab2β antibodies are of paramount interest and are a primary focus of this review. These anti-Id Abs recognize the binding site of the parent antibody and thus prevent the parent antibody from binding to its antigen [7]. Also, Ab2βs possess an “internal image” of the external antigen, which leads to anti-Id Abs and antigens competitively binding to specific antibodies [8].
This review aims to synthesize the current understanding of anti-Id Abs. We begin by examining their fundamental characteristics and generation mechanisms (Section 2), followed by their roles in various pathological conditions (Section 3). We then explore their dual significance in therapy: on one hand, their ability to neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies presents a promising avenue for treating autoimmune diseases; on the other hand, their formation as anti-drug antibodies can compromise the efficacy of monoclonal antibody therapies (Section 4). Another remarkable aspect under discussion is the ability of certain anti-Id Abs to mimic biologically active molecules, such as cytokines, neurotransmitters, and hormones, acting as their functional internal images (Section 5). Finally, we highlight the most translational application of these antibodies: their potential as innovative tools for vaccine development, particularly in the fields of oncology and infectious diseases like HIV (Section 6). By consolidating this knowledge, this review underscores the broad prospects of anti-Id Ab research for developing novel targeted therapies.

2. Network Concept and Idiotypic Cascades

In 1974, Niels Kaj Jerne proposed the “network hypothesis” [8]. He postulated that antibodies have the unique ability to both recognize antigens and to be recognized by other antibodies as antigens, thus creating a balanced network that regulates the humoral part of the immune system [9]. Immunological homeostasis involves an equilibrium between the primary antibody (idiotypic antibody, Ab1) and the secondary antibody (anti-idiotypic, anti-Id, Ab2), with Ab2-reactive lymphocytes governing the formation of Ab1. Anti-Id Abs are responsible for maintaining the homeostasis of adaptive humoral immune responses via the neutralization of idiotypic antibodies and the regulation of their secretion [10,11]. An Anti-Id Ab, possessing an idiotype similar to the epitope of the antigen, can bind to the antigen-binding site of Ab1 and compete with the antigen for binding to Ab1, thereby regulating the function of the antibody.
The network concept was investigated in several separate studies, with Ab2β used as an antigen to generate specific immune responses [12,13]. Research has shown that interactions between idiotypic antibodies and anti-Id Abs can regulate the immune response to an antigen, either stimulating or inhibiting it, according to research [14,15]. When the body encounters its own or foreign antigens, the immunologic equilibrium is altered, which causes Ab1 to be generated. Therefore, the generation of Ab2 antibodies is increased. Ab2 regulates the function and variety of Ab1-producing B cells, resulting in lower levels of Ab1 [16]. In other words, the immune response can be modulated, either dampened or heightened, by the generation of anti-Id Abs. For example, tetanus anatoxin vaccination has been shown not only to induce the expected increase in antibodies against tetanus anatoxin but also to trigger a subsequent increase in anti-Id Abs that reduce to normalize the level of free antibodies to tetanus anatoxin [17].
Anti-idiotypic responses can be induced not only by Ab1 idiotypic antibodies but also by anti-Id Abs (Ab2) (Figure 2). To illustrate, anti-anti-Id Abs (Ab3) were generated in rabbits immunized with polyclonal Ab2 induced by purified Ab1 produced in response to carbohydrate immunization of Micrococcus lysodeikticus bacteria [18]. Comparable results were observed in BALB/c mice that were immunized with myeloma levan-binding protein. These mice produced not only Ab2 antibodies but also Ab3 antibodies, which were further used for the induction of anti-anti-anti-Id Abs (Ab4) [19]. The Ab1 and Ab3 members of this idiotypic cascade are linked by a shared cross-reactive regulatory idiotope that interacts with both Ab2 and Ab4 [19]. The same sequential progression of the idiotypic cascade has also been identified in humans, specifically in cancer patients undergoing treatment with therapeutic antibodies [20]. Idiotypic cascades have been reported to result in anti-anti-anti-anti-idiotype (Ab4) and even in Ab6 [21]. Figure 2 presents a schematic representation of the anti-Id Ab cascade formation.
The study of idiotypic cascades has yielded an important discovery: although antigen-induced Ab1 can provoke an anti-idiotypic response (Ab2), Ab2 immunization does not result in Ab1 recruitment. The subsequent stages of the cascade also follow this rule. Hence, the idiotypic cascade moves only forward. The Ab3 response to Ab2 is different from that to Ab1.

Similarity in Epitopes Between Antigens and Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies

The interaction between Ab1 and anti-Id Ab is a perfect fit, similar to a key and its lock. These interactions are studied by examining the 3D structure. Multiple research efforts have revealed the 3D structures of different anti-Id mAbs, both independently and when bound to an idiotope [22,23,24,25]. Hen egg lysozyme (HEL) serves as the antigen for monoclonal antibody D1.3. The three-dimensional crystal structures of antibody D1.3 complexes with HEL [26] and anti-Id mAb (E5.2) [27] have been determined. The three-dimensional structures of the two complexes were compared, revealing that 18 amino acid residues of antibody D1.3 participated in binding to anti-Id mAb E5.2, whereas 17 residues were involved in antigen binding. Furthermore, 13 amino acid residues were found to contribute to the formation of bonds with both anti-Id mAb and antigen. These 13 amino acid residues of D1.3 were identified to account for 75% of the antibody contact area with the anti-Id mAb and 87% of the antigen contact area, with the contact patterns comparable in each case. Hence, anti-Id mAb E5.2 has been observed to imitate the HEL antigen, despite not presenting a precise “topological image” [27]. These findings were acquired exclusively through the utilization of a structural approach.
Anti-Id Ab establishes chemical contacts with Ab1 residues that are essentially identical to those that interact with the antigen. Nonetheless, this does not indicate a structural similarity between anti-Id Ab and the antigen. The mimicry of anti-Id Ab epitopes is functional and mediated by similar binding interactions [27]. This nonstructural but functional mimicry is also observed with anti-Id Abs responding to Ab1 generated against non-protein antigens. For example, Ab2 is unable to mimic polysaccharide structure, but it can trigger a polysaccharide-specific reaction to a polysaccharide antigen [28].

3. Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Normal and Pathological Conditions

3.1. Autoimmune Diseases: The Balance Between Autoantibodies and Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies

Autoimmune diseases arise from a breakdown in immune tolerance, leading the immune system to mistakenly target and damage the body’s own tissues. For example, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease, which is defined by the production of autoantibodies against a wide range of self-antigens, including nuclear antigens (nucleosomes, DNA, histones), myelin sheath proteins, phospholipids, and others [29].
The potential for anti-idiotypic antibodies to bind and regulate autoantibody levels could have beneficial effects on disease progression. This is corroborated by research demonstrating the absence of anti-Id Abs during periods of active autoimmune disease [30]. Anti-Id Abs against autoantibodies have been described in several autoimmune diseases such as SLE, myasthenia gravis, Sjögren’s syndrome, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura [31,32,33,34].
Autoantibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) are a serological hallmark of most commonly detected in SLE. High levels of anti-Id Abs to anti-dsDNA antibodies are found during remission in patients with autoimmune diseases, with lower levels of anti-Id Abs antibodies found during the acute, active phases of the disease [35,36]. It is worth noting that the concentrations of anti-Id Abs frequently exhibit an inverse relationship with the activity of autoimmune diseases [7]. Notably, anti-Id Abs against anti-dsDNA antibodies are found in the family members of those with SLE [37], people who interacted with SLE patients [38], and even in healthy individuals [39].
It has also been demonstrated that autoimmune sera from patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome and SLE contain anti-Id Abs, anti-La/SSB antibodies, which inhibit the binding of anti-La/SSB antibodies to recombinant La/SSB by 91% [34].
Anti-Id Abs have also been described in the normal human immune response. It is suggested that they provide protection by obstructing pathogenic autoantibodies [17]. In other words, autoantibodies are present in healthy individuals but are masked by the presence of anti-Id Abs. Consequently, despite the fact that most healthy individuals test negative for autoantibodies with standard antibody assays, more advanced assays reveal the presence of autoantibodies that are concealed by anti-Id Abs [40]. Let us proceed with particular examples. It is believed that anti-P autoantibodies are specific to systemic lupus erythematosus patients. However, anti-P antibodies were readily identified in healthy participants who were serologically negative for anti-P antibodies during routine screening, once inhibitory antibodies had been removed [41,42].
Another case is that autoantibodies against the E2 subunit of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex are considered characteristic of patients suffering from primary biliary cirrhosis. However, they are also present in healthy individuals but are masked by anti-Id Abs [43].
One more illustration is that antibodies to the 65-kDa isoform of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD65) are markers of autoimmune response in type 1 diabetes (DM1) and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) [44,45]. In healthy individuals, GAD65 antibodies are found in a complex with GAD65-specific anti-Id Abs. Consequently, these antibodies are undetectable in standard assays. Using immobilized monoclonal antibodies against GAD65 to absorb anti-Id Abs from plasma enabled the detection of GAD65 antibodies in serum [44]. Within the autoimmune process, the extended release of GAD65 during beta cell destruction leads to the permanent activation of polyclonal GAD65-specific B cells and subsequent secretion of anti-GAD65 antibodies. Alterations in secreted anti-GAD65 antibody idiotypes will result from somatic mutations and affinity maturation, ultimately leading to an inadequate anti-idiotypic response to these modifications. The concentration of anti-Id Abs specific to GAD65 autoantibodies was reported to be significantly lower in DM1 patients relative to healthy individuals [44]. Upon remission, patients with DM1 exhibit elevated levels of anti-Id Abs [46]. Furthermore, a reduction in anti-GAD65 autoantibodies has been observed in the early stages of DM1 development, preceding the emergence of additional markers associated with the autoimmune response [7]. Hence, anti-Id Abs to GAD65 autoantibodies can be used to predict DM1.
Consequently, the equilibrium of autoantibodies and anti-Id Abs supports the homeostasis of the adaptive immune response. The disruption of this equilibrium, caused by reduced protective elements or elevated autoimmunity, may cause autoimmune diseases.
A noteworthy study concerning the elicitation of autoimmunity in immunologically naïve mice through idiotypic immunization has been reported. (1) Following administration of Id-16/6 anti-dsDNA antibodies, mice exhibited SLE symptoms; (2) immunization with anti-cardiolipin antibodies (H-3 and MIV-7) led to the development of antiphospholipid syndrome; and (3) Wegener’s granulomatosis was induced by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Across all three experiments, mice generated corresponding anti-Id Abs (Ab2), and subsequently, within 4–8 months, immunized mice produced anti-anti-Id Abs (Ab3). The emergence of these antibodies in the serum of the mice correlated with the emergence of all classical clinical and laboratory indicators observed in individuals with these autoimmune disorders [47].

3.2. Therapeutic Applications of Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Autoimmune Diseases

Treatment strategies for autoimmune diseases typically involve either nonspecific immunosuppression or the targeting of disease manifestations [48]. However, autoimmune disease management involves extended therapy with elevated dosages of immunosuppressants, which can cause life-threatening opportunistic infections and undesirable adverse effects [49]. Therefore, the past few years have witnessed attempts to employ anti-Id Abs for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
Antibodies against IgG constant regions, also known as rheumatoid factor [50,51], are used as one of the markers for the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-Id Abs against monoclonal rheumatoid factor have been developed and were reported to significantly decrease rheumatoid factor production in vitro in cell cultures from rheumatoid arthritis patients [52].
Administration of human monoclonal antibody b96.11, specific to GAD65, to prediabetic and non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice substantially delays the onset of autoimmune diabetes. This treatment also resulted in the formation of anti-Id Abs. These induced anti-Id Abs were found to block GAD65 binding to the corresponding antibody [53]. This finding is consistent with observations in humans, where the presence of both GAD65-specific anti-Id Abs and GAD65 autoantibodies has been observed in the serum of healthy subjects [44].

3.3. Formation of Catalytic Antibodies via an Anti-Idiotypic Mechanism

Catalytic antibodies, which can not only bind antigens but also catalyze specific reactions in a manner similar to enzymes, have been known to exist for a considerable amount of time [54,55,56,57]. Lerner postulated in 1984 [58] that antibody-derived transition state analogs are capable of inducing catalysis by forcing the substrate into the transition state following binding (Figure 3A). This hypothesis suggests that antibodies developed against a tetrahedrally charged phosphate hapten can catalyze the hydrolysis of corresponding carbonate and carboxylic acid esters [59,60]. Subsequently, natural antibodies with the ability to cleave nucleic acids, proteins, and polysaccharide substrates were documented. The presence of such catalytic antibodies that bind to host antigens has often been associated with various autoimmune diseases. For example, patients with autoimmune conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis were found to possess catalytic antibodies that hydrolyze DNA, RNA, and some specific autoantigens [29,61,62,63]. Proteolytic antibodies, both polyclonal [64,65] and monoclonal [66,67,68], targeting β-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease [69], have been discovered. Furthermore, IgG and IgM have been shown to hydrolyze HIV proteins such as gp120 [70,71,72,73], gp41 [74], and other substrates [75,76].
Further research has led to the development of various methods and techniques for generating catalytic antibodies with specific characteristics, especially those not found in nature [77,78]. One approach to generating catalytic antibodies involves creating haptens that replicate transition-state characteristics in catalytic reactions. Among the disadvantages of this approach are weak antibody activity and inefficient mimicking of natural enzymes [79,80,81].
Figure 3. Various methods for producing catalytic antibodies: (A) Synthesis of stable transition state analogs (1) and their use as haptens for animal immunization (2) [82,83]. (B) Production of antibodies with catalytic function by recombining or replacing a fragment of the catalytic domain of an enzyme with a variegated region of the antibody [82]. (C) Generation of catalytic antibody based on “idiotypic network theory” [82,84].
Figure 3. Various methods for producing catalytic antibodies: (A) Synthesis of stable transition state analogs (1) and their use as haptens for animal immunization (2) [82,83]. (B) Production of antibodies with catalytic function by recombining or replacing a fragment of the catalytic domain of an enzyme with a variegated region of the antibody [82]. (C) Generation of catalytic antibody based on “idiotypic network theory” [82,84].
Vaccines 13 01224 g003
An alternative strategy is the production of catalytic anti-idiotypic antibodies (anti-Id Abs). In this approach, a natural enzyme is used as the antigen [85,86] (Figure 3B). According to Jerne’s network concept [8], the active site of an enzyme can be mimicked through sequential immune responses. The first antibody (idiotypic, Ab1) is generated against the enzyme’s active site. The second antibody (anti-idiotypic, Ab2), which is complementary to Ab1, then mirrors the structure and function of the original enzymatic site (Figure 3C). This method has been successfully used to generate antibodies with amidase [87], serine protease [88], esterase [89], and carboxypeptidase activity [90].
Specific examples illustrate this principle. The anti-idiotypic monoclonal IgG antibody 9G4H9 was generated against an antibody that recognizes the active site of β-lactamase. The resulting 9G4H9 antibody was shown to exhibit β-lactamase-like activity, despite having no sequence homology with natural β-lactamases [91]. Similarly, the anti-idiotypic monoclonal IgM antibody 9A8, produced against an acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting mAb (AE-2), was found to possess esterolytic activity. Again, its variable domain demonstrated catalytic function without sharing primary sequence homology with the enzyme [92].
The discovery of nanobodies—single-domain antibodies composed solely of heavy chains found in Camelidae [93]—has provided a powerful platform for generating catalytic anti-Id Abs. Their simple architecture facilitates the construction of robust single-domain antibody libraries [94]. Such phage display libraries can be screened using Ab1 as an antigen to select for catalytic anti-Id Abs (Ab2), a class of antibodies that has been shown to be well-represented in these libraries [78]. For instance, a catalytic anti-Id nanobody was obtained that converts the substrate alliin into the biologically active product allicin [78].

3.4. Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in COVID-19

The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the virus is located in the spike protein and plays an important role in viral binding to the host cell receptor [95]. SARS-CoV-2 uses the catalytic site of the ACE2 receptor for viral entry through the process of endocytosis [95].
It has been reported that following SARS-CoV-2 infection, not only are antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein produced, but also autoantibodies against ACE2, which may be significant for the development of long COVID after SARS-CoV-2 infection [96,97,98,99,100]. Antibodies against ACE2 are detected in the blood of individuals who have recovered from COVID-19, and their titer significantly correlates with the severity of the disease [101]. Moreover, the presence of anti-ACE2 antibodies is not detected prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection [102].
Mouse studies have shown that serial vaccination with mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 induces not only persistent anti-spike antibodies but also antibodies against ACE2 in both wild-type mice and K18 mice (transgenic mice expressing human ACE2). Importantly, the anti-idiotypic response is polyclonal in nature, and anti-ACE2 antibodies constitute only a subset of the overall anti-Id Abs population [103].
Viewed through the lens of Jerne’s anti-idiotypic network hypothesis [104], anti-ACE2 antibodies are anti-idiotypic and may be structurally similar to the original antigen (the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein) and, consequently, capable of binding to the same receptors as the original antigen [98].
It is worth noting that anti-ACE2 antibodies can influence the results of S-protein antibody titer assays. This occurs due to competition between the S-protein coated in the plate wells and the anti-ACE2 antibodies for binding to anti-spike antibodies. Thus, these anti-ACE2 antibodies can lead to an underestimation of the quantitative determination of anti-S antibodies in a sample [105]. Furthermore, it has been shown that some COVID-19 patients produce antibodies with catalytic activity capable of cleaving a synthetic ACE2 substrate [106] and the RBD [56].

4. Antibodies with Anti-Drug Activity

Modern technology has facilitated the active development of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) as pharmaceutical agents [107,108]. Monoclonal therapeutic antibodies are a versatile class of therapeutics for treating a wide range of human diseases due to their high specificity. To date, monoclonal antibodies are one of the most promising agents in the pharmaceutical industry, constituting nearly half of the therapeutic proteins approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [109]. Hundreds more mAbs are in various stages of clinical development.
Despite the clinical and commercial success of numerous antibody-based treatments, their effectiveness tends to be restricted to a subset of patients. A major challenge for therapeutic antibodies is their immunogenicity. The immunogenicity of therapeutic mAbs primarily manifests in the formation of anti-Id Abs. Such antibodies are called anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) [110]. The development of ADAs alters the bioavailability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of therapeutic mAbs and reduces their efficacy [111,112]. Numerous research investigations have demonstrated an inverse correlation between the production of ADAs as a result of treatment, the functional levels of the particular medication administered, and the clinical response observed, such as in the cases of natalizumab [113] (anti-α4-integrin), infliximab [114,115], and adalimumab [116,117]. Due to the possibility of causing severe adverse immune reactions, ADAs can have a negative impact on the safety profile of mAb drugs [118]. The antigenic site of ADA is most often associated with the binding region of the antibody. However, the generation of ADAs targeting the hinge regions of the antibody has also been reported following treatment with abatacept and etanercept [119].
Adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab, which are anti-TNFα drugs for immune-mediated diseases, are the best examples to characterize the development of ADA [120]. The prevalence of ADA formation differs depending on the specific drug, with infliximab exhibiting a greater incidence of ADA development (0–83% of patients) relative to adalimumab (0–54%) and golimumab (0–19%) [119].
Immune checkpoint inhibitor mAbs targeting PD-1 (pembrolizumab and nivolumab) are approved for use in metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and small cell lung cancer. ADAs against pembrolizumab have been reported to occur at a frequency of 0.7–2.5% [121,122,123].
Infliximab is a drug approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, the emergence of ADAs with neutralizing activity is a concern with infliximab use: the reported prevalence of ADAs in patients undergoing therapy ranges from 15 to 54% [114,124,125]. ADAs to rituximab have been reported in 4–11% of patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis [114] and in 26–37% of patients treated for multiple sclerosis [113].
There is another challenge that researchers face in developing therapeutic mAbs against HIV. Monoclonal antibody efficacy studies are often conducted on macaques infected with SHIV [126,127,128]. A limitation of these types of studies is the propensity for ADA formation when human mAbs are introduced to rhesus macaques, given that the whole antibody (Fab and Fc domains included) is recognized as foreign [129].
In summary, it is important to emphasize that the immunogenicity of therapeutic mAbs can be influenced by many factors, including product-specific factors (e.g., protein structure), treatment-related factors (e.g., use of concomitant therapy, dosing, continuous or intermittent administration), and patient-related factors (e.g., genetic predisposition and underlying disease). For example, the rate of ADA formation has been shown to be higher with chimeric mAbs compared to some fully human mAbs and fusion proteins [119]. Currently, many gaps remain in the understanding of ADAs.

Techniques for Detecting Anti-Drug Antibodies

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are widely employed for ADA screening, including direct assays [130], sandwich assays [131], bridging assays [132], and competitive ELISAs [133]. However, the detection of ADA via this method is complicated by the presence of drugs and ADA–drug complexes in the blood.
ELISA can detect anti-idiotypic antibodies using sorbed idiotypic antibodies in plate wells. Given that anti-Id Abs are usually in equilibrium with idiotypic antibodies, the detection of such antibodies in plasma demands a pretreatment step designed to deplete the target idiotypic antibodies [134]. An affinity-based technique employing sorbed antigen can be used to purify plasma from masking idiotypic antibodies, as demonstrated in [29,36].
Alternative approaches for the detection of ADA encompass high-performance liquid chromatography [135], electrochemiluminescent assays [136,137], radiometric assays [138], radioimmunoassays [139], and cytotoxicity assays [140].
ADA–drug complexes can be isolated by acidifying plasma samples [141]. An alternative is antigen-binding testing, which measures the quantity of ADA–drug immune complexes [110]. For example, the feasibility of using liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to measure ADA–drug immunocomplexes has been demonstrated using infliximab as an example. This approach relies on the use of isotopically labeled antigen-binding fragments of infliximab (SIL_IFX_F(ab’)2) for indirect binding and ADA quantification. Following the capture of IgG, including ADA, with Protein A magnetic beads, SIL_IFX_F(ab’)2 was added for labeling purposes. Subsequently, the ADA concentration was measured using LC-MS/MS [142].

5. Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies That Can Mimic Diverse Molecules

Anti-Id Abs have been engineered to emulate a wide range of molecules, including interferons, neurotransmitters, hormones, and substances often associated with drug abuse. The following section will delve into various examples of such antibodies.
A monoclonal antibody known as D9D10 functions by inhibiting the biological activity of human interferon-γ, often referred to as IFN-γ. An anti-Id mAb AA1E5, which embodies the intrinsic image of IFN-γ, was generated. AA1E5 exhibits competitive binding with IFN-γ at D9D10, which is indicative of its anti-idiotypic nature. Moreover, the AA1E5 molecule mirrors human IFN-γ by binding to the IFN-γ receptor [143]. Sequence comparison between the complementarity-determining regions of the antibody and IFN-γ revealed that both the heavy chain variable domain (VH) and the kappa light chain variable domain contain 3–4 amino acid epitopes that are also present in the IFN-γ sequence and contribute to receptor binding [144].
Anti-Id mAbs against antibodies to haloperidol (neurotransmitter) were obtained. These anti-Id mAbs exhibited an effect comparable to haloperidol on dopamine D-2 receptors and exhibited successful binding [145].
Another study involved immunizing rabbits with affinity-purified antibodies against serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) to obtain anti-Id Abs. The resulting anti-Id Abs were found to bind to complete anti-5-HT antibodies, as well as their Fab fragments. The findings indicated that these anti-Id Abs recognized 5-HT1B, 5-HT1C, and 5-HT2 subtype receptors [146].
In a further example, anti-Id Abs were produced by using rat insulin-specific antibodies as an immunogen. These antibodies successfully blocked the interaction of insulin with its receptor. The binding of anti-Id antibodies to thymocyte insulin receptors functionally mirrored insulin binding, as measured by α-aminoisobutyric acid uptake [147].
Furthermore, the ability of anti-Id mAb 1D5 to interact with the estrogen receptor was assessed by examining its binding to the site of a monoclonal anti-estradiol antibody. The data revealed that 1D5 could replicate estradiol bioactivity through the recognition of estradiol receptors [148].
The development of anti-Id mAb B-32 specific for growth hormone was reported in another study. The function of B-32 involves specific interactions with growth hormone receptors, activated growth hormone receptors and Janus kinase signal transducers, and the JAK2/STAT5 signaling pathways [149].
Monoclonal antibodies to morphine were used to generate a mouse anti-idiotypic mAb (Ab2-AOR) targeting the opioid receptor. In competitive binding assays, Ab2-AOR was shown to compete with tritiated opioid ligands—dihydromorphine, naloxone, and etorphine—for rat brain opioid receptors [150]. In a separate study, anti-Id Abs were developed that functionally mimic the morphine molecule. The authors demonstrated that these antibodies inhibit the binding of morphine to both opiate receptors and anti-morphine antibodies [151].
An anti-Id mAb K2-3f was obtained that mimics the cocaine molecule and binds to hDAT with higher affinity than cocaine itself. Furthermore, K2-3f not only prevents cocaine binding to hDAT but concurrently promotes dopamine uptake [152].

6. Therapeutic Potential of Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Vaccine Development

The idiotype-based approach can serve as a foundation for vaccine development. This approach involves the use of anti-Id Abs as antigen-mimetics to induce a specific immune response against the target antigen. The anti-Id Abs mimic the shape of a key part of the antigen, resulting in the immune system producing antibodies against the target antigen. Anti-Id Abs have the potential for immunization against conformation-dependent epitopes and low-immunogenic, non-protein antigens. Anti-Id Abs can be designed to mimic lipid, carbohydrate, nucleic acid epitopes, or drugs [153]. In such cases, anti-Id Abs are proteins that mimic a non-protein epitope [154]. Furthermore, an anti-idiotypic vaccine may reduce the probability of undesirable adverse effects that are frequently linked to standard antigenic vaccines [155]. Given appropriate selection, monoclonal anti-Id Abs (anti-Id mAbs) can substitute for the antigen without eliciting a broad spectrum of antibodies in the same manner as the original antigen [156]. Another advantage of the anti-idiotypic vaccine is its high specificity, which allows for focusing the immune response on a critical neutralizing epitope.
The following section reviews some examples of anti-idiotype antibodies that could be used in vaccine development.

6.1. Antidiotypic Vaccines Targeting Tumor-Associated Carbohydrate Antigens

Abnormal glycosylation is connected to the expression of carbohydrate-based tumor-associated antigens on tumor cells [157]. Gangliosides play a significant role in cancer immunotherapy efforts. The National Cancer Institute researched and identified 75 potential antigens for cancer vaccines, with four of them being gangliosides GD2, GD3, fucosyl GM1, and N-acetyl-GM3 [158].
Although gangliosides have weak immunogenic properties, several studies have revealed the presence of endogenous anti-ganglioside antibodies. Antibodies targeting GM2 and GD2 were identified in the serum of melanoma patients and healthy individuals [159]. A separate study has reported the presence of anti-GM1, anti-GD1a, anti-GD1b, and anti-GT1b antibodies in healthy subjects [160]. In addition, anti-ganglioside antibodies have been shown to have antitumor cytotoxic ability [161]. Antibody binding to ganglioside causes conformational alterations, thereby triggering intracellular signals that promote apoptosis [162]. Anti-GD2 antibodies from healthy donors have also been reported to be cytotoxic against neuroblastoma cells [163].
Ganglioside-mimicking anti-Id Abs were developed for the purpose of tumor immunotherapy. In rabbits, immunization with mouse anti-Id Ab BEC2 versus anti-GD3 mAb R24 demonstrated GD3-mimicking ability and induced a specific antibody response [164]. In clinical trials involving melanoma and small cell lung cancer patients, BEC2 exhibited immunogenicity and stimulated an anti-anti-idiotypic response. However, only a minority of patients developed specific anti-GD3 antibodies [164] (Table 1).
Another study involved the production of an anti-Id Ab that mimics GD2 ganglioside. A specific IgG response against ganglioside was elicited upon immunization with this antibody, leading to the induction of lysis in GD2-positive cells [165]. Based on anti-Id mAbs, a therapeutic drug TriGem has been developed that mimics the disialoganglioside GD2, which is highly expressed in melanomas. The preliminary study indicated that of the 12 patients treated, one exhibited a complete response, while six demonstrated a cessation of tumor progression. The subsequent research revealed a complete response in one patient, and 12 out of 40 patients had stable disease [166]. TriGem has undergone evaluation in both preclinical and clinical settings [166].
Racotumomab, Ab2γ, was produced against the murine anti-ganglioside N-glycolyl (NGc) GM3 (NGcGM3) [167]. The safety profile of racotumomab has been demonstrated in multiple Phase I studies across melanoma, breast, and lung cancers [168,169]. Patients who generated antibodies against NGcGM3 were found to exhibit extended median survival rates [170]. The findings of a randomized trial of Racotumomab indicated tumor cell necrosis [171]. Racotumomab (Vaxira), the first anti-idiotypic vaccine, has received regulatory approval and is now available in both Cuba and Argentina. Vaxira has been shown to increase survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer at recurrent or advanced stages (IIIB/IV). The Phase III study (NCT01460472) is currently in progress (Table 1).
Hence, numerous studies have demonstrated that tumor antigen-specific antibodies can facilitate antitumor activity by initiating an idiotypic cascade, which, in turn, stimulates an immune response specific to the tumor antigen.

6.2. Anti-Idiotypic Vaccines Designed to Target Tumor-Associated Protein Antigens

Patients with advanced melanoma were treated with a mouse monoclonal antibody, MK2-23, that mimics HMW-MAA (high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen). An immune response to HMW-MAA, decreased metastases, and extended overall survival were observed [172]. In two clinical studies, patients diagnosed with stage IV malignant melanoma received administrations of murine anti-Id mAb MF11-30, a mimetic of HMW-MAA. One patient exhibited complete remission with the resolution of several abdominal lymph nodes, and three patients demonstrated minor responses [173].
The effectiveness of two anti-Id mAbs, mAb 3H1 (CeaVac) and 11D10 (TriAb), which are designed to mimic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and human milk fat globule protein (HMGF), respectively, was assessed in lung cancer patients. A Phase II study was performed using anti-Id mAbs 3H1 and 11D10 in patients with completely resected stage II and stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NCT000000006470, Table 1).
Several clinical trials have reported the use of anti-Id mAb ACA-125, which imitates the CA-125 tumor antigen, characteristically overexpressed in ovarian tumors. Preclinical studies and Phase I clinical trials have indicated that ACA-125 can stimulate humoral and cellular immune reactions to CA-125, with no toxicity observed [174] (Table 1).
Studies on the use of anti-Id Abs as cancer vaccines in colorectal cancer have focused on three major tumor antigens of protein nature: EpCAM, CD55, and CEA [175]. Anti-Id mAb 3H1 was assessed in a controlled, randomized Phase III clinical trial involving 630 patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer [176]. Antibody responses to CEA were detected in 70% of individuals who received 3H1.
The anti-cancer vaccine 105AD7 is a human anti-Id mAb that functions similarly to CD55. A Phase I clinical trial demonstrated that the cancer vaccine improved the median relapse-free survival in vaccinated patients compared to those who were not [177]. However, these findings were not corroborated by a randomized, double-blind Phase II survival study [178] (Table 1).
Hence, anti-Id Abs might provide a basis for the creation of cancer immunotherapy vaccines.

6.3. Anti-Idiotypic HIV-1 Vaccines

Attempts to create an HIV-1 vaccine have been unsuccessful, even after decades of research [70,179]. An alternative method for developing an HIV-1 vaccine involves using anti-Id Abs.
Mouse mAbs specific to the viral protein p24 were used to generate anti-Id Abs. When rats were immunized with anti-Id Abs, they developed considerable levels of antibodies that targeted the p24 protein [180]. Another study produced six monoclonal anti-Id Abs that targeted two mouse mAbs against p24: VIC5 and VIC6. Mice given the combined antibodies showed only a slight reaction to the p24 antigen [181].
One strategy for creating an HIV-1 vaccine involves generating antibodies that target conserved areas on Env, like the CD4 binding site on gp120 (CD4bs). Using the concept of idiotypic mimicry, anti-Id Abs were generated to mimic the conformation of CD4b. Rabbits that were vaccinated with these anti-Id Abs developed antibodies that could identify both recombinant and cellular human CD4 [182].
Another investigation yielded two murine anti-Id mAbs that mimicked the CD4 gp120 binding site. These anti-idiotype mAbs have demonstrated the capacity to recognize the idiotype of the broadly neutralizing human mAb b12 and elicit a robust response against gp120 in rabbits. Moreover, rabbit serum has been demonstrated to neutralize two susceptible HIV-1 strains in a pseudovirus neutralization assay [183].
Monoclonal antibody 2F5 is among the most potent and broadly neutralizing antibodies against HIV-1. Immunization with anti-Id mAb Ab2/3H6 has been proposed as an alternative method for the induction of 2F5-like antibodies. Specific antibodies to HIV-1 were produced in rabbits immunized with anti-Id mAba. However, these antibodies did not exhibit neutralizing activity against the virus [184].
An alternative strategy involved isolating broadly neutralizing IgG antibodies from HIV-infected individuals who maintained high CD4 and CD8 levels without specific therapy. The immunization of mice with these antibodies allowed two monoclonal antibodies against the idiotype, designated P1 and P2, to be isolated. The rabbit serum, produced following immunization with P1 antibody, exhibited neutralizing effects against HXB2 pseudovirus [183].
Another study tested four different formats of anti-Id mAb P1: two as single chains and two in the form of minibodies. A particular conformation of the mini-antibody MbVHVL has been found to have a high binding affinity for the broadly neutralizing antibody b12 and to stimulate an immune response to HIV-1 in rabbits [185].
Several studies of the immune response to HIV-1 have documented the presence of antibodies with the common idiotype designated as 1F7. Administration of monoclonal antibodies against 1F7 to macaques resulted in idiotype-specific clonal suppression with expansion of the antibody response to HIV envelope proteins [186].
Another study involved the creation of anti-Id mAb iv8, which has a strong binding affinity for VRC01 class B-cell precursor receptors. It has been demonstrated that anti-Id mAbs have the potential to increase VRC01 class B cells in vivo while avoiding the activation of B cell clones causing off-target responses to Env [187].
Hence, anti-idiotypic immunogens can be generated using the idiotype of broadly neutralizing antibodies. Anti-idiotypic antibodies can serve as a basis for creating novel HIV vaccine ideas.

6.4. Anti-Idiotypic Antibody-Based Vaccines: Prospects and Challenges

The progress in developing oncology vaccines based on anti-Id Abs is very encouraging. A number of vaccines are either approved for use or in different phases of clinical trials. For example, a Phase Ib clinical trial employing anti-Id Abs demonstrated efficacy in twenty-three patients with advanced colorectal cancer, who had not responded to standard treatments [188]. Clinical trials have shown that the anti-cancer drug racotumomomab is safe and well-tolerated, and it has been authorized for use in Cuba and Argentina under the name Vaxira [189]. In 2010, the FDA approved sipuleucel-T as the first cancer vaccine for treating metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer [190]. In 2015, the FDA and EMA approved and granted orphan drug status to dinutuximab (sold as unituxin) for use in treating high-risk neuroblastoma in children as a first-line treatment [191]. Dinutuximab β (marketed under the name isquette) gained approval in 2017 as a secondary treatment option for neuroblastoma [192].
With regard to autoimmune diseases, the use of anti-Id Abs as vaccines in patients is still in its infancy. Only a small number of drugs are entering the clinical trial phase. A small clinical trial, for example, demonstrated a positive outcome in SLE patients who received vaccination with anti-Id Abs [193].
Table 1 provides an overview of anti-Id Abs-based vaccines currently in different phases of clinical trials, with the information sourced from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (accessed 14 August 2025).
However, the development of vaccines based on anti-Id Abs faces a number of challenges. The process of obtaining high-quality and standardized anti-Id Abs is multistage and costly. Antibodies can be produced in monoclonal or polyclonal forms, each with distinct limitations in their manufacturing processes. Monoclonal antibodies are produced through hybridoma technologies, which demand considerable technical proficiency and prolonged manufacturing periods [194]. For example, such technology was used to generate a murine anti-Id mAb that simulates a specific epitope of carcinoembryogenic antigen, a known tumor-associated antigen [195].
Polyclonal antibodies can be derived from immunized animals. Nevertheless, the unique biochemical and biophysical properties of these antibodies may exhibit inter-batch variability, which poses a challenge to their utilization as pharmaceuticals [189]. A polyclonal anti-idiotypic antibody developed in goats against CO17-1A/GA733 binds to two different epitopes of the colorectal cancer antigen, in contrast to monoclonal antibodies that bind to only one epitope of the antigen [196]. Despite batch-to-batch variability, polyclonal antibodies can be produced in a shorter timeframe compared to monoclonal antibodies.
Interest in idiotypic vaccines has waned somewhat with the introduction of mRNA and DNA vaccine platforms that offer faster and more economical development pathways.
Despite the considerable obstacles associated with developing anti-Id Abs as vaccines, ongoing advances in research and clinical trials are producing encouraging outcomes, indicating that the potential applications of anti-idiotypic vaccines might be substantially broadened. The principle of using anti-Id Abs represents a brilliant example of how the internal regulatory mechanisms of the immune system can be harnessed against itself to generate protection. This strategy enables the immune system to develop defenses against genuine threats by presenting it with nothing more than a precise mold of the target. This field continues to remain an important niche in immunology and biotechnology, particularly for addressing particularly challenging tasks.

7. Conclusions

The application of anti-Id Abs in treating several diseases presents a highly promising strategy. In the field of oncology, the therapeutic potential of anti-Id Abs can be harnessed to treat a variety of cancers. Tumor-associated antigens can be used to induce a strong immune response with negligible side effects instead of chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The primary benefit of the anti-idiotypic strategy is the specific targeting of tumor antigens, which results in reduced toxicity and fewer side effects compared with conventional treatments.
Gaining insight into the mechanisms governing immune response regulation in autoimmune diseases will yield considerable clinical advantages for diagnosis and treatment. The ability of anti-Id Abs to neutralize and inhibit the secretion of pathological autoantibodies may find application in the development of therapies. A major advantage of using anti-Id Abs therapies is their ability to precisely target complementary autoantibodies, thus successfully reducing the specific immune response without compromising the normal function of the rest of the immune system.
Anti-Id Abs can be used in the treatment of other diseases as well. We conclude that the current technological and equipment infrastructure permits the development of innovative methodologies for the treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of a range of diseases, based on anti-Id Abs. Furthermore, investigations into anti-Id Abs will enhance our comprehension of immune system regulation and offer new approaches to targeted therapy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.T.; methodology, A.M.T., S.E.S. and G.A.N.; validation, A.M.T., S.E.S. and G.A.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.T., S.E.S. and G.A.N.; writing—review and editing, A.M.T., S.E.S. and G.A.N.; visualization, A.M.T.; project administration, A.M.T.; funding acquisition A.M.T. and G.A.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian state-funded project for ICBFM SB RAS, grant no. 125012300658-9).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AbAntibody
ADAsAnti-drug antibodies
anti-Id AbsAnti-idiotypic antibodies
CD4bsCD4 binding site
CDRComplementarity-determining region
dsDNADouble-stranded DNA
ELISAEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
EMA (EMA)European Medicines Agency
FDAFood and Drug Administration
GAD6565-kDa isoform of glutamate decarboxylase
HMGFHuman milk fat globule protein
LC-MS/MSLiquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry
mAbMonoclonal antibody
NODNon-obese diabetic
RBDReceptor-binding domain
SSpike
SLESystemic lupus erythematosus
VHVariable domain

References

  1. Cazenave, P.A. Idiotypic-Anti-Idiotypic Regulation of Antibody Synthesis in Rabbits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 5122–5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kobayashi, N.; Oiwa, H.; Kubota, K.; Sakoda, S.; Goto, J. Monoclonal Antibodies Generated against an Affinity-Labeled Immune Complex of an Anti-Bile Acid Metabolite Antibody: An Approach to Noncompetitive Hapten Immunoassays Based on Anti-Idiotype or Anti-Metatype Antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 2000, 245, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jerne, N.K.; Roland, J.; Cazenave, P.A. Recurrent Idiotopes and Internal Images. EMBO J. 1982, 1, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bona, C.A.; Finley, S.; Waters, S.; Kunkel, H.G. Anti-Immunoglobulin Antibodies. III. Properties of Sequential Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies to Heterologous Anti-Gamma Globulins. Detection of Reactivity of Anti-Idiotype Antibodies with Epitopes of Fc Fragments (Homobodies) and with Epitopes and Idiotopes (Epibodies). J. Exp. Med. 1982, 156, 986–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kang, C.-Y.; Brunck, T.K.; Kieber-Emmons, T.; Blalock, J.E.; Kohler, H. Inhibition of Self-Binding Antibodies (Autobodies) by a VH-Derived Peptide. Science 1988, 240, 1034–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kang, C.Y.; Kohler, H. Immunoglobulin with Complementary Paratope and Idiotope. J. Exp. Med. 1986, 163, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Larsson, H.E.; Jönsson, I.; Lernmark, Å.; Ivarsson, S.; Radtke, J.R.; Hampe, C.S. Decline in Titers of Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies Specific to Autoantibodies to GAD65 (GAD65Ab) Precedes Development of GAD65Ab and Type 1 Diabetes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jerne, N.K. Towards a Network Theory of the Immune System. Ann. Immunol. 1974, 125C, 373–389. [Google Scholar]
  9. Langman, R.; Cohn, M. The ‘Complete’ Idiotype Network Is an Absurd Immune System. Immunol. Today 1986, 7, 100–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kim, B.S. Mechanisms of Idiotype Suppression: Role of Anti-Idiotype Antibody. Surv. Immunol. Res. 1982, 1, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodkey, L.S. Autoregulation of Immune Responses via Idiotype Network Interactions. Microbiol. Rev. 1980, 44, 631–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Grzych, J.M.; Capron, M.; Lambert, P.H.; Dissous, C.; Torres, S.; Capron, A. An Anti-Idiotype Vaccine against Experimental Schistosomiasis. Nature 1985, 316, 74–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Herlyn, D.; Somasundaram, R.; Zaloudik, J.; Jacob, L.; Harris, D.; Kieny, M.-P.; Sears, H.; Mastrangelo, M. Anti-Idotype and Recombinant Antigen in Immunotherapy of Colorectal Cancer. Cell Biophys. 1994, 24–25, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kennedy, R.C.; Adler-Storthz, K.; Henkel, R.D.; Sanchez, Y.; Melnick, J.L.; Dreesman, G.R. Immune Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen: Enhancement by Prior Injection of Antibodies to the Idiotype. Science 1983, 221, 853–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kennedy, R.C.; Dreesman, G.R. Enhancement of the Immune Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen. In Vivo Administration of Antiidiotype Induces Anti-HBs That Expresses a Similar Idiotype. J. Exp. Med. 1984, 159, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Seledtsov, V.I.; Seledtsova, G.V. A Possible Role for Idiotype/Anti-Idiotype B–T Cell Interactions in Maintaining Immune Memory. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Geha, R.S. Idiotypic-Antiidiotypic Interactions in Man. Ric. Clin. Lab. 1985, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Urbain, J.; Wikler, M.; Franssen, J.D.; Collignon, C. Idiotypic Regulation of the Immune System by the Induction of Antibodies against Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 5126–5130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bona, C.A.; Heber-Katz, E.; Paul, W.E. Idiotype-Anti-Idiotype Regulation. I. Immunization with a Levan-Binding Myeloma Protein Leads to the Appearance of Auto-Anti-(Anti-Idiotype) Antibodies and to the Activation of Silent Clones. J. Exp. Med. 1981, 153, 951–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lemke, H. Immune Response Regulation by Antigen Receptors’ Clone-Specific Nonself Parts. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Polonelli, L.; Beninati, C.; Teti, G.; Felici, F.; Ciociola, T.; Giovati, L.; Sperindè, M.; Passo, C.L.; Pernice, I.; Domina, M.; et al. Yeast Killer Toxin-Like Candidacidal Ab6 Antibodies Elicited through the Manipulation of the Idiotypic Cascade. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bentley, G.A.; Boulot, G.; Riottot, M.M.; Poljak, R.J. Three-Dimensional Structure of an Idiotope–Anti-Idiotope Complex. Nature 1990, 348, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ban, N.; Day, J.; Wang, X.; Ferrone, S.; McPherson, A. Crystal Structure of an Anti-Anti-Idiotype Shows It to Be Self-Complementary. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 255, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Evans, S.V.; Rose, D.R.; To, R.; Young, N.M.; Bundle, D.R. Exploring the Mimicry of Polysaccharide Antigens by Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 241, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chang, C.-C.; Hernandez-Guzman, F.G.; Luo, W.; Wang, X.; Ferrone, S.; Ghosh, D. Structural Basis of Antigen Mimicry in a Clinically Relevant Melanoma Antigen System. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 41546–41552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhat, T.N.; Bentley, G.A.; Boulot, G.; Greene, M.I.; Tello, D.; Dall, W.; Souchon, H.; Schwarz, F.P.; Mariuzza, R.A.; Poljak, R.J. Bound Water Molecules and Conformational Stabilization Help Mediate an Antigen-Antibody Association. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fields, B.A.; Goldbaum, F.A.; Ysern, X.; Poijak, R.J.; Mariuzza, R.A. Molecular Basis of Antigen Mimicry by an Anti-Idiotope. Nature 1995, 374, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Magliani, W.; Polonelli, L.; Conti, S.; Salati, A.; Rocca, P.F.; Cusumano, V.; Mancuso, G.; Teti, G. Neonatal Mouse Immunity against Group B Streptococcal Infection by Maternal Vaccination with Recombinant Anti-Idiotypes. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bezuglova, A.M.; Konenkova, L.P.; Doronin, B.M.; Buneva, V.N.; Nevinsky, G.A. Affinity and Catalytic Heterogeneity and Metal-Dependence of Polyclonal Myelin Basic Protein-Hydrolyzing IgGs from Sera of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J. Mol. Recognit. 2011, 24, 960–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pan, S.Y.; Chia, Y.C.; Yee, H.R.; Fang Cheng, A.Y.; Anjum, C.E.; Kenisi, Y.; Chan, M.K.; Wong, M.B. Immunomodulatory Potential of Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies for the Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases. Futur. Sci. OA 2021, 7, FSO648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abdou, N.I.; Wall, H.; Lindsley, H.B.; Halsey, J.F.; Suzuki, T. Network Theory in Autoimmunity. J. Clin. Investig. 1981, 67, 1297–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dwyer, D.S.; Bradley, R.J.; Urquhart, C.K.; Kearney, J.F. Naturally Occurring Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis Patients. Nature 1983, 301, 611–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mehta, Y.S.; Ghosh, K.; Badakere, S.S.; Pathare, A.V.; Mohanty, D. Role of Antiidiotypic Antibodies on the Clinical Course of Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2003, 142, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Routsias, J.G.; Touloupi, E.; Dotsika, E.; Moulia, A.; Tsikaris, V.; Sakarellos, C.; Sakarellos-Daitsiotis, M.; Moutsopoulos, H.M.; Tzioufas, A.G. Unmasking the Anti-La/SSB Response in Sera from Patients with Sjogren’s Syndrome by Specific Blocking of Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies to La/SSB Antigenic Determinants. Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Silvestris, F.; Bankhurst, A.D.; Searles, R.P.; Williams, R.C. Studies of Anti—F(Ab’) 2 Antibodies and Possible Immunologic Control Mechanisms in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1984, 27, 1387–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Timofeeva, A.M.; Sedykh, S.E.; Ermakov, E.A.; Matveev, A.L.; Odegova, E.I.; Sedykh, T.A.; Shcherbakov, D.N.; Merkuleva, I.A.; Volosnikova, E.A.; Nesmeyanova, V.S.; et al. Natural IgG against S-Protein and RBD of SARS-CoV-2 Do Not Bind and Hydrolyze DNA and Are Not Autoimmune. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Abdou, N.I.; Suenaga, R.; Hatfield, M.; Evans, M.; Hassanein, K.M. Antiidiotypic Antibodies against Anti-DNA Antibodies in Sera of Families of Lupus Patients. J. Clin. Immunol. 1989, 9, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Williams, W.M.; Isenberg, D.A. Naturally Occurring Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies Reactive with Anti-DNA Antibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Lupus 1998, 7, 164–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zouali, M.; Eyquem, A. Expression of Anti-Idiotypic Clones against Auto-Anti-DNA Antibodies in Normal Individuals. Cell. Immunol. 1983, 76, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hampe, C.S. Protective Role of Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Autoimmunity—Lessons for Type 1 Diabetes. Autoimmunity 2012, 45, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pan, Z.J.; Anderson, C.J.; Stafford, H.A. Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies Prevent the Serologic Detection of Antiribosomal P Autoantibodies in Healthy Adults. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 102, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Anderson, C.J.; Neas, B.R.; Pan, Z.; Taylor-Albert, E.; Reichlin, M.; Stafford, H.A. The Presence of Masked Antiribosomal P Autoantibodies in Healthy Children. Arthritis Rheum. 1998, 41, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, Q.; Rowley, M.J.; Mackay, I.R. Anti–Idiotypic Antibodies to Anti-Pdc-E2 in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis and Normal Subjects. Hepatology 1999, 29, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Oak, S.; Gilliam, L.K.; Landin-Olsson, M.; Törn, C.; Kockum, I.; Pennington, C.R.; Rowley, M.J.; Christie, M.R.; Banga, J.P.; Hampe, C.S. The Lack of Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies, Not the Presence of the Corresponding Autoantibodies to Glutamate Decarboxylase, Defines Type 1 Diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5471–5476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Timofeeva, A.M.; Klyaus, N.A.; Sedykh, S.E.; Nevinsky, G.A. Antibodies Specific to Rheumatologic and Neurologic Pathologies Found in Patient with Long COVID. Rheumato 2025, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Örtqvist, E.; Brooks-Worrell, B.; Lynch, K.; Radtke, J.; Bekris, L.M.; Kockum, I.; Agardh, C.-D.; Cilio, C.M.; Lethagen, A.L.; Persson, B.; et al. Changes in GAD65Ab-Specific Antiidiotypic Antibody Levels Correlate with Changes in C-Peptide Levels and Progression to Islet Cell Autoimmunity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, E310–E318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shoenfeld, Y. Idiotypic Induction of Autoimmunity: A New Aspect of the Idiotypic Network. FASEB J. 1994, 8, 1296–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karim, M.Y.; Pisoni, C.N.; Khamashta, M.A. Update on Immunotherapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus—What’s Hot and What’s Not! Rheumatology 2009, 48, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Miller, E. Immunosuppressive Therapy in the Treatment of Immune—Mediated Disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1992, 6, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dörner, T.; Egerer, K.; Feist, E.; Burmester, G.R. Rheumatoid Factor Revisited. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2004, 16, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ingegnoli, F.; Castelli, R.; Gualtierotti, R. Rheumatoid Factors: Clinical Applications. Dis. Markers 2013, 35, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Takeuchi, T.; Hosono, O.; Koide, J.; Homma, M.; Abe, T. Suppression of Rheumatoid Factor Synthesis by Antiidiotypic Antibody in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Cross—Reactive Idiotypes. Arthritis Rheum. 1985, 28, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hall, T.R.; Bogdani, M.; LeBoeuf, R.C.; Kirk, E.A.; Maziarz, M.; Banga, J.P.; Oak, S.; Pennington, C.A.; Hampe, C.S. Modulation of Diabetes in NOD Mice by GAD65—Specific Monoclonal Antibodies Is Epitope Specific and Accompanied by Anti—Idiotypic Antibodies. Immunology 2008, 123, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tanaka, F. Catalytic Antibodies as Designer Proteases and Esterases. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4885–4906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Suzuki, H. Recent Advances in Abzyme Studies 1. J. Biochem. 1994, 115, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Timofeeva, A.M.; Shayakhmetova, L.S.; Nikitin, A.O.; Sedykh, T.A.; Matveev, A.L.; Shanshin, D.V.; Volosnikova, E.A.; Merkuleva, I.A.; Shcherbakov, D.N.; Tikunova, N.V.; et al. Natural Antibodies Produced in Vaccinated Patients and COVID-19 Convalescents Hydrolyze Recombinant RBD and Nucleocapsid (N) Proteins. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Timofeeva, A.M.; Sedykh, S.E.; Sedykh, T.A.; Nevinsky, G.A. Natural Antibodies Produced in Vaccinated Patients and COVID-19 Convalescents Recognize and Hydrolyze Oligopeptides Corresponding to the S-Protein of SARS-CoV-2. Vaccines 2023, 11, 1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lerner, R.A. Antibodies of Predetermined Specificity in Biology and Medicine. Adv. Immunol. 1984, 36, 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pollack, S.J.; Jacobs, J.W.; Schultz, P.G. Selective Chemical Catalysis by an Antibody. Science 1986, 234, 1570–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tramontano, A.; Janda, K.D.; Lerner, R.A. Catalytic Antibodies. Science 1986, 234, 1566–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ermakov, E.A.; Kabirova, E.M.; Sizikov, A.E.; Buneva, V.N.; Nevinsky, G.A. IgGs-Abzymes from the Sera of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Hydrolyzed MiRNAs. J. Inflamm. Res. 2020, 13, 681–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vlassov, A.; Florentz, C.; Helm, M.; Naumov, V.; Buneva, V.; Nevinsky, G.; Giege, R. Characterization and Selectivity of Catalytic Antibodies from Human Serum with RNase Activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 5243–5250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Timofeeva, A.M.; Buneva, V.N.; Nevinsky, G.A. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Molecular Cloning and Analysis of 22 Individual Recombinant Monoclonal Kappa Light Chains Specifically Hydrolyzing Human Myelin Basic Protein. J. Mol. Recognit. 2015, 28, 614–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Taguchi, H.; Planque, S.; Nishiyama, Y.; Szabo, P.; Weksler, M.E.; Friedland, R.P.; Paul, S. Catalytic Antibodies to Amyloid β Peptide in Defense against Alzheimer Disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 2008, 7, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Paul, S.; Planque, S.; Nishiyama, Y. Immunological Origin and Functional Properties of Catalytic Autoantibodies to Amyloid β Peptide. J. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 30, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Planque, S.A.; Nishiyama, Y.; Sonoda, S.; Lin, Y.; Taguchi, H.; Hara, M.; Kolodziej, S.; Mitsuda, Y.; Gonzalez, V.; Sait, H.B.R.; et al. Specific Amyloid β Clearance by a Catalytic Antibody Construct. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 10229–10241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Taguchi, H.; Planque, S.; Nishiyama, Y.; Symersky, J.; Boivin, S.; Szabo, P.; Friedland, R.P.; Ramsland, P.A.; Edmundson, A.B.; Weksler, M.E.; et al. Autoantibody-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Amyloid β Peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 4714–4722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nishiyama, Y.; Taguchi, H.; Hara, M.; Planque, S.A.; Mitsuda, Y.; Paul, S. Metal-Dependent Amyloid β-Degrading Catalytic Antibody Construct. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 180, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Timofeeva, A.M.; Aulova, K.S.; Nevinsky, G.A. Modeling Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of Gene-Modified and Induced Animal Models, Complex Cell Culture Models, and Computational Modeling. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Timofeeva, A.; Sedykh, S.; Nevinsky, G. Post-Immune Antibodies in HIV-1 Infection in the Context of Vaccine Development: A Variety of Biological Functions and Catalytic Activities. Vaccines 2022, 10, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Planque, S.; Nishiyama, Y.; Taguchi, H.; Salas, M.; Hanson, C.; Paul, S. Catalytic Antibodies to HIV: Physiological Role and Potential Clinical Utility. Autoimmun. Rev. 2008, 7, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Planque, S.; Mitsuda, Y.; Taguchi, H.; Salas, M.; Morris, M.-K.; Nishiyama, Y.; Kyle, R.; Okhuysen, P.; Escobar, M.; Hunter, R.; et al. Characterization of Gp120 Hydrolysis by IgA Antibodies from Humans without HIV Infection. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2007, 23, 1541–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Paul, S.; Planque, S.; Zhou, Y.-X.; Taguchi, H.; Bhatia, G.; Karle, S.; Hanson, C.; Nishiyama, Y. Specific HIV Gp120-Cleaving Antibodies Induced by Covalently Reactive Analog of Gp120. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 20429–20435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Uda, T.; Hifumi, E. Super Catalytic Antibody and Antigenase. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2004, 97, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Odintsova, E.S.; Dmitrenok, P.S.; Timofeeva, A.M.; Buneva, V.N.; Nevinsky, G.A. Why Specific Anti-Integrase Antibodies from HIV-Infected Patients Can Efficiently Hydrolyze 21-Mer Oligopeptide Corresponding to Antigenic Determinant of Human Myelin Basic Protein. J. Mol. Recognit. 2014, 27, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Timofeeva, A.; Sedykh, S.; Maksimenko, L.; Sedykh, T.; Skudarnov, S.; Ostapova, T.; Yaschenko, S.; Gashnikova, N.; Nevinsky, G. The Blood of the HIV-Infected Patients Contains κ-IgG, λ-IgG, and Bispecific Κλ-IgG, Which Possess DNase and Amylolytic Activity. Life 2022, 12, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tramontano, A. Immune Recognition, Antigen Design, and Catalytic Antibody Production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1994, 47, 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, J.-W.; Xia, L.; Su, Y.; Liu, H.; Xia, X.; Lu, Q.; Yang, C.; Reheman, K. Molecular Imprint of Enzyme Active Site by Camel Nanobodies. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 13713–13721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chong, L.T.; Bandyopadhyay, P.; Scanlan, T.S.; Kuntz, I.D.; Kollman, P.A. Direct Hydroxide Attack Is a Plausible Mechanism for Amidase Antibody 43C9. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1371–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Benedetti, F.; Berti, F.; Brady, K.; Colombatti, A.; Pauletto, A.; Pucillo, C.; Thomas, N.R. An Unprecedented Catalytic Motif Revealed in the Model Structure of Amide Hydrolyzing Antibody 312d6. ChemBioChem 2004, 5, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kim, Y.-R.; Kim, J.-S.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, W.-R.; Sohn, J.-N.; Chung, Y.-C.; Shim, H.-K.; Lee, S.-C.; Kwon, M.-H.; Kim, Y.-S. Heavy and Light Chain Variable Single Domains of an Anti-DNA Binding Antibody Hydrolyze Both Double- and Single-Stranded DNAs without Sequence Specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 15287–15295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mahendra, A.; Sharma, M.; Rao, D.N.; Peyron, I.; Planchais, C.; Dimitrov, J.D.; Kaveri, S.V.; Lacroix-Desmazes, S. Antibody-Mediated Catalysis: Induction and Therapeutic Relevance. Autoimmun. Rev. 2013, 12, 648–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xu, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Janda, K.D. Catalytic Antibodies: Hapten Design Strategies and Screening Methods. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 5247–5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Padiolleau-Lefèvre, S.; Naya, R.B.; Shahsavarian, M.A.; Friboulet, A.; Avalle, B. Catalytic Antibodies and Their Applications in Biotechnology: State of the Art. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 1369–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Friboulet, A.; Izadyar, L.; Avalle, B.; Roseto, A.; Thomas, D. Abzyme Generation Using an Anti-Idiotypic Antibody as the “Internal Image” of an Enzyme Active Site. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1994, 47, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Friboulet, A.; Izadyar, L.; Avalle, B.; Roseto, A.; Thomas, D. Antiidiotypic Antibodies as Functional Internal Images of Enzyme—Active Sites. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1995, 750, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Avalle, B.; Thomas, D.; Friboulet, A. Functional Mimicry: Elicitation of a Monoclonal Antiidiotypic Antibody Hydrolizing Β—Lactams. FASEB J. 1998, 12, 1055–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Pillet, D.; Paon, M.; Vorobiev, I.I.; Gabibov, A.G.; Thomas, D.; Friboulet, A. Idiotypic Network Mimicry and Antibody Catalysis: Lessons for the Elicitation of Efficient Anti-Idiotypic Protease Antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 2002, 269, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Izadyar, L.; Friboulet, A.; Remy, M.H.; Roseto, A.; Thomas, D. Monoclonal Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies as Functional Internal Images of Enzyme Active Sites: Production of a Catalytic Antibody with a Cholinesterase Activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 8876–8880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lacroix-Desmazes, S.; Wootla, B.; Delignat, S.; Dasgupta, S.; Nagaraja, V.; Kazatchkine, M.D.; Kaveri, S.V. Pathophysiology of Catalytic Antibodies. Immunol. Lett. 2006, 103, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Lefevre, S.; Debat, H.; Thomas, D.; Friboulet, A.; Avalle, B. A Suicide—Substrate Mechanism for Hydrolysis of Β—Lactams by an Anti—Idiotypic Catalytic Antibody. FEBS Lett. 2001, 489, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kolesnikov, A.V.; Kozyr, A.V.; Alexandrova, E.S.; Koralewski, F.; Demin, A.V.; Titov, M.I.; Avalle, B.; Tramontano, A.; Paul, S.; Thomas, D.; et al. Enzyme Mimicry by the Antiidiotypic Antibody Approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13526–13531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hamers-Casterman, C.; Atarhouch, T.; Muyldermans, S.; Robinson, G.; Hammers, C.; Songa, E.B.; Bendahman, N.; Hammers, R. Naturally Occurring Antibodies Devoid of Light Chains. Nature 1993, 363, 446–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Harmsen, M.M.; De Haard, H.J. Properties, Production, and Applications of Camelid Single-Domain Antibody Fragments. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 77, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kurbel, S. Jerne’s “Immune Network Theory”, of Interacting Anti—Idiotypic Antibodies Applied to Immune Responses during COVID-19 Infection and after COVID-19 Vaccination. BioEssays 2023, 45, e2300071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Arthur, J.M.; Forrest, J.C.; Boehme, K.W.; Kennedy, J.L.; Owens, S.; Herzog, C.; Liu, J.; Harville, T.O. Development of ACE2 Autoantibodies after SARS-CoV-2 Infection. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Murphy, W.J.; Longo, D.L. A Possible Role for Anti-Idiotype Antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 394–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Timofeeva, A.M.; Sedykh, S.E.; Nevinsky, G.A. SARS-CoV-2 Infection as a Risk Factor for the Development of Autoimmune Pathology. Mol. Meditsina Mol. Med. 2022, 20, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Timofeeva, A.M.; Aulova, K.S.; Mustaev, E.A.; Nevinsky, G.A. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Molecular Mimicry: An Immunoinformatic Screen for Cross-Reactive Autoantigen Candidates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Lebedin, M.; García, C.V.; Spatt, L.; Ratswohl, C.; Thibeault, C.; Ostendorf, L.; Alexander, T.; Paul, F.; Sander, L.E.; Kurth, F.; et al. Discriminating Promiscuous from Target-specific Autoantibodies in COVID-19. Eur. J. Immunol. 2023, 53, 2250210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hallmann, E.; Sikora, D.; Poniedziałek, B.; Szymański, K.; Kondratiuk, K.; Żurawski, J.; Brydak, L.; Rzymski, P. IgG Autoantibodies against ACE2 in SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients. J. Med. Virol. 2023, 95, e28273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Collins, C.P.; Herzog, C.; Vick, L.V.; Nielsen, R.; Harville, Y.I.; Longo, D.L.; Arthur, J.M.; Murphy, W.J. Sequential SARS-CoV-2 MRNA Vaccination Induces Anti-Idiotype (Anti-ACE2) Antibodies in K18 Human ACE2 Transgenic Mice. Vaccines 2025, 13, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Jerne, N.K. The Somatic Generation of Immune Recognition. Eur. J. Immunol. 1971, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tobes, R.; Pareja, E. Could Anti-ACE2 Antibodies Alter the Results of SARS-CoV-2 Ab Neutralization Assays? Immunol. Lett. 2022, 247, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Song, Y.; Myers, R.; Mehl, F.; Murphy, L.; Brooks, B.; Wilson, J.M.; Kadl, A.; Woodfolk, J.; Zeichner, S.L. ACE-2-like Enzymatic Activity Is Associated with Immunoglobulin in COVID-19 Patients. MBio 2024, 15, e0054124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Reichert, J.M. Antibodies to Watch in 2017. MAbs 2017, 9, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ecker, D.M.; Jones, S.D.; Levine, H.L. The Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody Market. MAbs 2015, 7, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lagassé, H.A.D.; Alexaki, A.; Simhadri, V.L.; Katagiri, N.H.; Jankowski, W.; Sauna, Z.E.; Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. Recent Advances in (Therapeutic Protein) Drug Development. F1000Research 2017, 6, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. van Schouwenburg, P.A.; Rispens, T.; Wolbink, G.J. Immunogenicity of Anti-TNF Biologic Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2013, 9, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Atzeni, F.; Talotta, R.; Salaffi, F.; Cassinotti, A.; Varisco, V.; Battellino, M.; Ardizzone, S.; Pace, F.; Sarzi-Puttini, P. Immunogenicity and Autoimmunity during Anti-TNF Therapy. Autoimmun. Rev. 2013, 12, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. De Groot, A.S.; Scott, D.W. Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics. Trends Immunol. 2007, 28, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Vennegoor, A.; Rispens, T.; Strijbis, E.M.; Seewann, A.; Uitdehaag, B.M.; Balk, L.J.; Barkhof, F.; Polman, C.H.; Wolbink, G.; Killestein, J. Clinical Relevance of Serum Natalizumab Concentration and Anti-Natalizumab Antibodies in Multiple Sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2013, 19, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Wolbink, G.J.; Vis, M.; Lems, W.; Voskuyl, A.E.; De Groot, E.; Nurmohamed, M.T.; Stapel, S.; Tak, P.P.; Aarden, L.; Dijkmans, B. Development of Antiinfliximab Antibodies and Relationship to Clinical Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 711–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Radstake, T.R.D.J.; Svenson, M.; Eijsbouts, A.M.; van den Hoogen, F.H.J.; Enevold, C.; van Riel, P.L.C.M.; Bendtzen, K. Formation of Antibodies against Infliximab and Adalimumab Strongly Correlates with Functional Drug Levels and Clinical Responses in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2009, 68, 1739–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bartelds, G.M. Development of Antidrug Antibodies Against Adalimumab and Association with Disease Activity and Treatment Failure During Long-Term Follow-Up. JAMA 2011, 305, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lecluse, L.L.A.; Driessen, R.J.B.; Spuls, P.I.; de Jong, E.M.G.J.; Stapel, S.O.; van Doorn, M.B.A.; Bos, J.D.; Wolbink, G.-J. Extent and Clinical Consequences of Antibody Formation Against Adalimumab in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. 2010, 146, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hansel, T.T.; Kropshofer, H.; Singer, T.; Mitchell, J.A.; George, A.J.T. The Safety and Side Effects of Monoclonal Antibodies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Strand, V.; Balsa, A.; Al-Saleh, J.; Barile-Fabris, L.; Horiuchi, T.; Takeuchi, T.; Lula, S.; Hawes, C.; Kola, B.; Marshall, L. Immunogenicity of Biologics in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review. BioDrugs 2017, 31, 299–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Gorovits, B.; Baltrukonis, D.J.; Bhattacharya, I.; Birchler, M.A.; Finco, D.; Sikkema, D.; Vincent, M.S.; Lula, S.; Marshall, L.; Hickling, T.P. Immunoassay Methods Used in Clinical Studies for the Detection of Anti-Drug Antibodies to Adalimumab and Infliximab. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2018, 192, 348–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Davda, J.; Declerck, P.; Hu-Lieskovan, S.; Hickling, T.P.; Jacobs, I.A.; Chou, J.; Salek-Ardakani, S.; Kraynov, E. Immunogenicity of Immunomodulatory, Antibody-Based, Oncology Therapeutics. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Enrico, D.; Paci, A.; Chaput, N.; Karamouza, E.; Besse, B. Antidrug Antibodies Against Immune Checkpoint Blockers: Impairment of Drug Efficacy or Indication of Immune Activation? Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. van Vugt, M.J.H.; Stone, J.A.; De Greef, H.J.M.M.; Snyder, E.S.; Lipka, L.; Turner, D.C.; Chain, A.; Lala, M.; Li, M.; Robey, S.H.; et al. Immunogenicity of Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced Tumors. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tanaka, Y.; Yamanaka, H.; Takeuchi, T.; Inoue, M.; Saito, K.; Saeki, Y.; Lee, S.J.; Nambu, Y. Safety and Efficacy of CT-P13 in Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in an Extension Phase or after Switching from Infliximab. Mod. Rheumatol. 2017, 27, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Krintel, S.B.; Grunert, V.P.; Hetland, M.L.; Johansen, J.S.; Rothfuss, M.; Palermo, G.; Essioux, L.; Klause, U. The Frequency of Anti-Infliximab Antibodies in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated in Routine Care and the Associations with Adverse Drug Reactions and Treatment Failure. Rheumatology 2013, 52, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Parsons, M.S.; Lloyd, S.B.; Lee, W.S.; Kristensen, A.B.; Amarasena, T.; Center, R.J.; Keele, B.F.; Lifson, J.D.; LaBranche, C.C.; Montefiori, D.; et al. Partial Efficacy of a Broadly Neutralizing Antibody against Cell-Associated SHIV Infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaaf1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Shapiro, M.B.; Cheever, T.; Malherbe, D.C.; Pandey, S.; Reed, J.; Yang, E.S.; Wang, K.; Pegu, A.; Chen, X.; Siess, D.; et al. Single-Dose BNAb Cocktail or Abbreviated ART Post-Exposure Regimens Achieve Tight SHIV Control without Adaptive Immunity. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Parsons, M.S.; Lee, W.S.; Kristensen, A.B.; Amarasena, T.; Khoury, G.; Wheatley, A.K.; Reynaldi, A.; Wines, B.D.; Hogarth, P.M.; Davenport, M.P.; et al. Fc-Dependent Functions Are Redundant to Efficacy of Anti-HIV Antibody PGT121 in Macaques. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 129, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Lee, W.S.; Reynaldi, A.; Amarasena, T.; Davenport, M.P.; Parsons, M.S.; Kent, S.J. Anti-Drug Antibodies in Pigtailed Macaques Receiving HIV Broadly Neutralising Antibody PGT121. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 749891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Wakelee, H.A.; Patnaik, A.; Sikic, B.I.; Mita, M.; Fox, N.L.; Miceli, R.; Ullrich, S.J.; Fisher, G.A.; Tolcher, A.W. Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lexatumumab (HGS-ETR2) given Every 2 Weeks in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Scheinberg, D.A.; Straus, D.J.; Yeh, S.D.; Divgi, C.; Garin-Chesa, P.; Graham, M.; Pentlow, K.; Coit, D.; Oettgen, H.F.; Old, L.J. A Phase I Toxicity, Pharmacology, and Dosimetry Trial of Monoclonal Antibody OKB7 in Patients with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Effects of Tumor Burden and Antigen Expression. J. Clin. Oncol. 1990, 8, 792–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Morris, M.J.; Eisenberger, M.A.; Pili, R.; Denmeade, S.R.; Rathkopf, D.; Slovin, S.F.; Farrelly, J.; Chudow, J.J.; Vincent, M.; Scher, H.I.; et al. A Phase I/IIA Study of AGS-PSCA for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2012, 23, 2714–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Plummer, R.; Attard, G.; Pacey, S.; Li, L.; Razak, A.; Perrett, R.; Barrett, M.; Judson, I.; Kaye, S.; Fox, N.L.; et al. Phase 1 and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lexatumumab in Patients with Advanced Cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 6187–6194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Künzel, C.; Abdolzade-Bavil, A.; Engel, A.M.; Pleitner, M.; Schick, E.; Stubenrauch, K. Assay Concept for Detecting Anti-Drug IgM in Human Serum Samples by Using a Novel Recombinant Human IgM Positive Control. Bioanalysis 2021, 13, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. van Brummelen, E.M.J.; Ros, W.; Wolbink, G.; Beijnen, J.H.; Schellens, J.H.M. Antidrug Antibody Formation in Oncology: Clinical Relevance and Challenges. Oncologist 2016, 21, 1260–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Murakami, H.; Ikeda, M.; Okusaka, T.; Inaba, Y.; Iguchi, H.; Yagawa, K.; Yamamoto, N. A Phase I Study of MEDI-575, a PDGFRα Monoclonal Antibody, in Japanese Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2015, 76, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Rasche, L.; Duell, J.; Castro, I.C.; Dubljevic, V.; Chatterjee, M.; Knop, S.; Hensel, F.; Rosenwald, A.; Einsele, H.; Topp, M.S.; et al. GRP78-Directed Immunotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma—Results from a Phase 1 Trial with the Monoclonal Immunoglobulin M Antibody PAT-SM6. Haematologica 2015, 100, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Forero, A.; Meredith, R.F.; Khazaeli, M.B.; Shen, S.; Grizzle, W.E.; Carey, D.; Busby, E.; LoBuglio, A.F.; Robert, F. Phase I Study of 90 Y-CC49 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Effect of Chelating Agents and Paclitaxel Co-Administration. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2005, 20, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chiorean, E.G.; Hurwitz, H.I.; Cohen, R.B.; Schwartz, J.D.; Dalal, R.P.; Fox, F.E.; Gao, L.; Sweeney, C.J. Phase I Study of Every 2- or 3-Week Dosing of Ramucirumab, a Human Immunoglobulin G1 Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 1230–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kreitman, R.J.; Tallman, M.S.; Robak, T.; Coutre, S.; Wilson, W.H.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; FitzGerald, D.J.; Lechleider, R.; Pastan, I. Phase I Trial of Anti-CD22 Recombinant Immunotoxin Moxetumomab Pasudotox (CAT-8015 or HA22) in Patients with Hairy Cell Leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 1822–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mikulskis, A.; Yeung, D.; Subramanyam, M.; Amaravadi, L. Solution ELISA as a Platform of Choice for Development of Robust, Drug Tolerant Immunogenicity Assays in Support of Drug Development. J. Immunol. Methods 2011, 365, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Smeijsters, E.H.; van der Elst, K.C.M.; Visch, A.; Göbel, C.; Loeff, F.C.; Rispens, T.; Huitema, A.D.R.; van Luin, M.; El Amrani, M. Optimization of a Quantitative Anti-Drug Antibodies against Infliximab Assay with the Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: A Method Validation Study and Future Perspectives. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Depraetere, H.; Depla, E.; Haelewyn, J.; De Ley, M. An Anti-idiotypic Antibody with an Internal Image of Human Interferon-γ and Human Interferon-γ-like Antiviral Activity. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 2260–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Walter, M.R.; Windsor, W.T.; Nagabhushan, T.L.; Lundell, D.J.; Lunn, C.A.; Zauodny, P.J.; Narula, S.K. Crystal Structure of a Complex between Interferon-γ and Its Soluble High-Affinity Receptor. Nature 1995, 376, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Elazar, Z.; Kanety, H.; Schreiber, M.; Fuchs, S. Anti-Idiotypes against a Monoclonal Anti-Haloperidol Antibody Bind to Dopamine Receptor. Life Sci. 1988, 42, 1987–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Tamir, H.; Liu, K.; Hsiung, S.; Yu, P.; Kirchgessner, A.L.; Gershon, M.D. Identification of Serotonin Receptors Recognized by Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies. J. Neurochem. 1991, 57, 930–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sege, K.; Peterson, P.A. Use of Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies as Cell-Surface Receptor Probes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1978, 75, 2443–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Mor, G.; Amir-Zaltsman, Y.; Barnard, G.; Kohen, F. Characterization of an Antiidiotypic Antibody Mimicking the Actions of Estradiol and Its Interaction with Estrogen Receptors. Endocrinology 1992, 130, 3633–3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Lan, H.-N.; Jiang, H.-L.; Li, W.; Wu, T.-C.; Hong, P.; Li, Y.M.; Zhang, H.; Cui, H.-Z.; Zheng, X. Development and Characterization of a Novel Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody to Growth Hormone, Which Can Mimic Physiological Functions of Growth Hormone in Primary Porcine Hepatocytes. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 28, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Coscia, C.J.; Szücs, M.; Barg, J.; Belcheva, M.M.; Bem, W.T.; Khoobehi, K.; Donnigan, T.A.; Juszczak, R.; McHale, R.J.; Hanley, M.R.; et al. A Monoclonal Anti-Idiotypic Antibody to μ and δ Opioid Receptors. Mol. Brain Res. 1991, 9, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Glasel, J.A.; Pelosi, L.A. Morphine-Mimetic Anti-Paratypic Antibodies: Cross-Reactive Properties. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1986, 136, 1177–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ho, M.; Segre, M. Inhibition of Cocaine Binding to the Human Dopamine Transporter by a Single Chain Anti-Idiotypic Antibody: Its Cloning, Expression, and Functional Properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Basis Dis. 2003, 1638, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Naveed, A.; Rahman, S.U.; Arshad, M.I.; Aslam, B. Immune Modulatory Potential of Anti-Idiotype Antibodies as a Surrogate of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Antigen. mSphere 2018, 3, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Westerink, M.A.J.; Apicella, M. Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies as Vaccines against Carbohydrate Antigens. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 1993, 15, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ma, J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, D. Functional Mimicry of an Anti-idiotypic Antibody to Nominal Antigen on Cellular Response. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 2002, 93, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Goldbaum, F.A.; Velikovsky, C.A.; Dall’Acqua, W.; Fossati, C.A.; Fields, B.A.; Braden, B.C.; Poljak, R.J.; Mariuzza, R.A. Characterization of Anti-Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies That Bind Antigen and an Anti-Idiotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 8697–8701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Singhal, A.; Hakomori, S. Molecular Changes in Carbohydrate Antigens Associated with Cancer. BioEssays 1990, 12, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Cheever, M.A.; Allison, J.P.; Ferris, A.S.; Finn, O.J.; Hastings, B.M.; Hecht, T.T.; Mellman, I.; Prindiville, S.A.; Viner, J.L.; Weiner, L.M.; et al. The Prioritization of Cancer Antigens: A National Cancer Institute Pilot Project for the Acceleration of Translational Research. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 5323–5337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Tai, T.; Cahan, L.D.; Tsuchida, T.; Saxton, R.E.; Irie, R.F.; Morton, D.L. Immunogenicity of Melanoma-associated Gangliosides in Cancer Patients. Int. J. Cancer 1985, 35, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Lardone, R.D.; Alaniz, M.E.; Irazoqui, F.J.; Nores, G.A. Unusual Presence of Anti-GM1 IgG-Antibodies in a Healthy Individual, and Their Possible Involvement in the Origin of Disease-Associated Anti-GM1 Antibodies. J. Neuroimmunol. 2006, 173, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Retter, M.W.; Johnson, J.C.; Peckham, D.W.; Bannink, J.E.; Bangur, C.S.; Dresser, K.; Cai, F.; Foy, T.M.; Fanger, N.A.; Fanger, G.R.; et al. Characterization of a Proapoptotic Antiganglioside GM2 Monoclonal Antibody and Evaluation of Its Therapeutic Effect on Melanoma and Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Xenografts. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 6425–6434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Aixinjueluo, W.; Furukawa, K.; Zhang, Q.; Hamamura, K.; Tokuda, N.; Yoshida, S.; Ueda, R.; Furukawa, K. Mechanisms for the Apoptosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Induced by Anti-GD2 Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 29828–29836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ollert, M.; David, K.; Vollmert, C.; Juhl, H.; Erttmann, R.; Bredehorst, R.; Vogel, C.-W. Mechanisms of in Vivo Antineuroblastoma Activity of Human Natural IgM. Eur. J. Cancer 1997, 33, 1942–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Chapman, P.B.; Houghton, A.N. Induction of IgG Antibodies against GD3 Ganglioside in Rabbits by an Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody. J. Clin. Investig. 1991, 88, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Sen, G.; Chakraborty, M.; Foon, K.A.; Reisfeld, R.A.; Bhattacharya-Chatterjee, M. Induction of IgG Antibodies by an Anti-Idiotype Antibody Mimicking Disialoganglioside GD2. J. Immunother. 1998, 21, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Foon, K.A.; Lutzky, J.; Baral, R.N.; Yannelli, J.R.; Hutchins, L.; Teitelbaum, A.; Kashala, O.L.; Das, R.; Garrison, J.; Reisfeld, R.A.; et al. Clinical and Immune Responses in Advanced Melanoma Patients Immunized with an Anti-Idiotype Antibody Mimicking Disialoganglioside GD2. J. Clin. Oncol. 2000, 18, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Perez, A.; Mier, E.S.; Vispo, N.S.; Vazquez, A.M.; Perez Rodríguez, R. A Monoclonal Antibody against NeuGc-Containing Gangliosides Contains a Regulatory Idiotope Involved in the Interaction with B and T Cells. Mol. Immunol. 2002, 39, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Díaz, A.; Alfonso, M.; Alonso, R.; Saurez, G.; Troche, M.; Catalá, M.; Díaz, R.M.; Pérez, R.; Vázquez, A.M. Immune Responses in Breast Cancer Patients Immunized with an Anti-Idiotype Antibody Mimicking NeuGc-Containing Gangliosides. Clin. Immunol. 2003, 107, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Neninger, E.; Diaz, R.M.; de la Torre, A.; Rives, R.; Diaz, A.; Saurez, G.; Gabri, M.R.; Alonso, D.F.; Wilkinson, B.; Alfonso, A.M.; et al. Active Immunotherapy with 1E10 Anti-Idiotype Vaccine in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer: Report of a Phase I Trial. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2007, 6, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Hernández, A.M.; Toledo, D.; Martínez, D.; Griñán, T.; Brito, V.; Macías, A.; Alfonso, S.; Rondón, T.; Suárez, E.; Vázquez, A.M.; et al. Characterization of the Antibody Response against NeuGcGM3 Ganglioside Elicited in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Immunized with an Anti-Idiotype Antibody. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 6625–6634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Alfonso, S.; Valdés-Zayas, A.; Santiesteban, E.R.; Flores, Y.I.; Areces, F.; Hernández, M.; Viada, C.E.; Mendoza, I.C.; Guerra, P.P.; García, E.; et al. A Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Racotumomab-Alum Vaccine as Switch Maintenance Therapy in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 3660–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Wang, X.; Ko, E.C.; Peng, L.; Gillies, S.D.; Ferrone, S. Human High Molecular Weight Melanoma-Associated Antigen Mimicry by Mouse Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody MK2-23: Enhancement of Immunogenicity of Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody MK2-23 by Fusion with Interleukin 2. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 6976–6983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Mittelman, A.; Chen, Z.J.; Kageshita, T.; Yang, H.; Yamada, M.; Baskind, P.; Goldberg, N.; Puccio, C.; Ahmed, T.; Arlin, Z. Active Specific Immunotherapy in Patients with Melanoma. A Clinical Trial with Mouse Antiidiotypic Monoclonal Antibodies Elicited with Syngeneic Anti-High-Molecular-Weight-Melanoma-Associated Antigen Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Investig. 1990, 86, 2136–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Wagner, U.; Schlebusch, H.; Köhler, S.; Schmolling, J.; Grünn, U.; Krebs, D. Immunological Responses to the Tumor-Associated Antigen CA15 in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Induced by the Murine Monoclonal Anti-Idiotype Vaccine ACA125. Hybridoma 1997, 16, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Chatterjee, M.B.; Foon, K.A.; Köhler, H. Idiotypic Antibody Immunotherapy of Cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 1994, 38, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chong, G.; Bhatnagar, A.; Cunningham, D.; Cosgriff, T.M.; Harper, P.G.; Steward, W.; Bridgewater, J.; Moore, M.; Cassidy, J.; Coleman, R.; et al. Phase III Trial of 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin plus Either 3H1 Anti-Idiotype Monoclonal Antibody or Placebo in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2006, 17, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Denton, G.W.L.; Durrant, L.G.; Hardcastle, J.D.; Austin, E.B.; Sewell, H.F.; Robins, R.A. Clinical Outcome of Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Human Monoclonal Anti-idiotypic Antibody. Int. J. Cancer 1994, 57, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Maxwell-Armstrong, C.A.; Durrant, L.G.; Buckley, T.J.D.; Scholefield, J.H.; Robins, R.A.; Fielding, K.; Monson, J.R.T.; Guillou, P.; Calvert, H.; Carmichael, J.; et al. Randomized Double-Blind Phase II Survival Study Comparing Immunization with the Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody 105AD7 against Placebo in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2001, 84, 1443–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Libera, M.; Caputo, V.; Laterza, G.; Moudoud, L.; Soggiu, A.; Bonizzi, L.; Diotti, R.A. The Question of HIV Vaccine: Why Is a Solution Not Yet Available? J. Immunol. Res. 2024, 2024, 2147912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Morrow, W.J.W.; Gaston, I.; Anderson, T.; Haigwood, N.; McGrath, M.S.; Rosen, J.; Steimer, K.S. Anti-Idiotypic Antisera Raised Against Monoclonal Aritibody Specific for a P24 Gag Region Epitope Detects a Common Interspecies Idiotype Associated with Anti-HIV Responses. Viral Immunol. 1990, 3, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Hohmann, A.; Peters, V.; Comacchio, R.; Bradley, J. Mouse Monoclonal Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies to HIV P24: Immunochemical Properties and Internal Imagery. Mol. Immunol. 1993, 30, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Corre, J.; Février, M.; Thèze, J.; Zouali, M.; Chamaret, S. Anti-idiotypic Antibodies to Human Anti-gp120 Antibodies Bind Recombinant and Cellular Human CD4. Eur. J. Immunol. 1991, 21, 743–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Burioni, R.; Mancini, N.; De Marco, D.; Clementi, N.; Perotti, M.; Nitti, G.; Sassi, M.; Canducci, F.; Shvela, K.; Bagnarelli, P.; et al. Anti-HIV-1 Response Elicited in Rabbits by Anti-Idiotype Monoclonal Antibodies Mimicking the CD4-Binding Site. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Mader, A.; Kunert, R. Evaluation of the Potency of the Anti-Idiotypic Antibody Ab2/3H6 Mimicking Gp41 as an HIV-1 Vaccine in a Rabbit Prime/Boost Study. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Caputo, V.; Negri, I.; Moudoud, L.; Libera, M.; Bonizzi, L.; Clementi, M.; Diotti, R.A. Anti-HIV Humoral Response Induced by Different Anti-Idiotype Antibody Formats: An In Silico and In Vivo Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Muller, S.; Margolin, D.H.; Min, G.; Lou, D.; Nara, P.; Axthelm, M.K.; Kohler, H. Stimulation of Antiviral Antibody Response in SHIV-IIIB-Infected Macaques. Scand. J. Immunol. 2001, 54, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Dosenovic, P.; Pettersson, A.-K.; Wall, A.; Thientosapol, E.S.; Feng, J.; Weidle, C.; Bhullar, K.; Kara, E.E.; Hartweger, H.; Pai, J.A.; et al. Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies Elicit Anti-HIV-1–Specific B Cell Responses. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 2316–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Bhattacharya-Chatterjee, M.; Chatterjee, S.K.; Foon, K.A. Anti-Idiotype Vaccine against Cancer. Immunol. Lett. 2000, 74, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Kohler, H.; Pashov, A.; Kieber-Emmons, T. The Promise of Anti-Idiotype Revisited. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Higano, C.S.; Small, E.J.; Schellhammer, P.; Yasothan, U.; Gubernick, S.; Kirkpatrick, P.; Kantoff, P.W. Sipuleucel-T. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 513–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. El Amrani, M.; Szanto, C.L.; Hack, C.E.; Huitema, A.D.R.; Nierkens, S.; van Maarseveen, E.M. Quantification of Total Dinutuximab Concentrations in Neuroblastoma Patients with Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 5849–5858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Özkaynak, M.F. Dinutuximab in the Treatment of Neuroblastoma. Expert Opin. Orphan Drugs 2017, 5, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Spertini, F.; Leimgruber, A.; Morel, B.; Khazaeli, M.B.; Yamamoto, K.; Dayer, J.M.; Weisbart, R.H.; Lee, M.L. Idiotypic Vaccination with a Murine Anti-DsDNA Antibody: Phase I Study in Patients with Nonactive Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Nephritis. J. Rheumatol. 1999, 26, 2602–2608. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  194. Lipman, N.S.; Jackson, L.R.; Trudel, L.J.; Weis-Garcia, F. Monoclonal Versus Polyclonal Antibodies: Distinguishing Characteristics, Applications, and Information Resources. ILAR J. 2005, 46, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Foon, K.A.; Chakraborty, M.; John, W.J.; Sherratt, A.; Köhler, H.; Bhattacharya-Chatterjee, M. Immune Response to the Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients Treated with an Anti-Idiotype Antibody Vaccine. J. Clin. Investig. 1995, 96, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Basak, S.; Eck, S.; Gutzmer, R.; Smith, A.J.; Birebent, B.; Purev, E.; Staib, L.; Somasundaram, R.; Zaloudik, J.; Li, W.; et al. Colorectal Cancer Vaccines: Antiidiotypic Antibody, Recombinant Protein, and Viral Vector. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 910, 237–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. Formation mechanism of the anti-idiotypic antibody cascade. The antigen elicits the formation of idiotypic Ab1 antibodies. These antibodies can potentially trigger the generation of anti-idiotypic Ab2 antibodies, which can then induce the formation of anti-anti-idiotypic Ab3 antibodies, and so on.
Figure 2. Formation mechanism of the anti-idiotypic antibody cascade. The antigen elicits the formation of idiotypic Ab1 antibodies. These antibodies can potentially trigger the generation of anti-idiotypic Ab2 antibodies, which can then induce the formation of anti-anti-idiotypic Ab3 antibodies, and so on.
Vaccines 13 01224 g002
Table 1. Anti-Id Abs, in different phases of clinical trials. The data were sourced from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (accessed 14 August 2025).
Table 1. Anti-Id Abs, in different phases of clinical trials. The data were sourced from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (accessed 14 August 2025).
StatusAntibodyOfficial TitleConditionsLast Update PostedClinicalTrials.gov ID
CompletedBEC2The SILVA Study: Survival in an International Phase III Prospective Randomized LD Small Cell Lung Cancer Vaccination Study with Adjuvant BEC2 and BCGLung Cancer6 March 2012NCT00003279
Unknown statusRacotumomabA Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Open Label Phase III Study of Active Specific Immunotherapy with Racotumomab Plus Best Support Treatment Versus Best Support Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.NSCLC
Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell
29 July 2016NCT01460472
Completed3H1Phase II Study of Postoperative Adjuvant Immunotherapy and Radiation in Patients with Completely Resected Stage II and Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung CancerLung Cancer13 August 2013NCT00006470
CompletedACA-125A Phase I/II Trial of ACA 125 in Patients with Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal CancerOvarian Cancer
Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
Peritoneal Neoplasms
2 October 2006NCT00103545
CompletedACA-125Phase I Trial of the Monoclonal Anti-Idiotype Antibody ACA125 in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal CancerFallopian Tube Cancer
Ovarian Cancer
Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer
5 June 2013NCT00058435
Unknown status105AD7A Phase I/II Trial of an Allogeneic Cell-Based Vaccine and an Anti-Idiotypic Antibody Vaccine Approach for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Colon or RectumColorectal Cancer20 September 2013NCT00007826
Completed4B5A Phase I/II Trial of a Human Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody Vaccine (4B5) Which Mimics the GD2 Antigen, in Patients with MelanomaMelanoma (Skin)12 April 2013NCT00004184
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Timofeeva, A.M.; Sedykh, S.E.; Nevinsky, G.A. Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Immune Regulation and Disease: Therapeutic Promise for Next-Generation Vaccines. Vaccines 2025, 13, 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13121224

AMA Style

Timofeeva AM, Sedykh SE, Nevinsky GA. Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Immune Regulation and Disease: Therapeutic Promise for Next-Generation Vaccines. Vaccines. 2025; 13(12):1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13121224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Timofeeva, Anna M., Sergey E. Sedykh, and Georgy A. Nevinsky. 2025. "Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Immune Regulation and Disease: Therapeutic Promise for Next-Generation Vaccines" Vaccines 13, no. 12: 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13121224

APA Style

Timofeeva, A. M., Sedykh, S. E., & Nevinsky, G. A. (2025). Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies in Immune Regulation and Disease: Therapeutic Promise for Next-Generation Vaccines. Vaccines, 13(12), 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13121224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop