Next Article in Journal
Leishmaniac Quest for Developing a Novel Vaccine Platform. Is a Roadmap for Its Advances Provided by the Mad Dash to Produce Vaccines for COVID-19?
Next Article in Special Issue
Citizen Stance towards Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination and Vaccine Booster Doses: A Study in Colombia, El Salvador and Spain
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccine among Pregnant Women in Real-World Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/vaccines10020247
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

How do Vaccinators Experience the Pandemic? Lifestyle Behaviors in a Sample of Italian Public Health Workers during the COVID-19 Era

by
Francesca Gallé
1,
Alessia Quaranta
2,
Christian Napoli
3,*,
Giusy Diella
2,
Osvalda De Giglio
2,
Giuseppina Caggiano
2,
Marco Di Muzio
4,
Pasquale Stefanizzi
2,
Giovanni Battista Orsi
5,
Giorgio Liguori
1 and
Maria Teresa Montagna
2
1
Department of Movement Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Naples Parthenope, 80133 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy
3
Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
4
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
5
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2022, 10(2), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020247
Received: 12 January 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2022 / Accepted: 2 February 2022 / Published: 6 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccine and Vaccination: On Field Research)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Public health workers (PHWs) have experienced substantial workload changes because of their role in managing measures to limit the spread of COVID-19. The study’s aim was to assess lifestyle changes in Italian PHWs during the pandemic. PHWs attending an annual meeting completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing their sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics and lifestyle changes during the pandemic. A total of 1000 questionnaires were completed. Most participants (63.5% women, mean age 40 ± 13.1 years) were of normal weight (61.5%), non-smokers (81.9%), had a total screen time of ≥5 h/day (83.1%), and slept at least 6 h/night (88.7%). Approximately one-third consumed sweet foods every day (30%) and did not engage in physical activity (34.6%). Current sweet food consumption, physical activity, and sleep were associated with changes in these behaviors in the last 2 years (Tau-b = 0.155; Tau-b = −0.175; Tau-b = −0.276, respectively, p < 0.001). An increase in remote working was associated with worse sleep (odds ratio (OR) 2.065, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.482–2.877) and diet (OR 1.982, 95% CI 1.385–2.838), and increased tablet/PC use (OR 3.314, 95% CI 2.358–4.656). Health promotion measures are needed to support the adoption of healthy lifestyles in this population during the current pandemic.

1. Introduction

The severe acute respiratory disease caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a serious public health problem worldwide and has posed an unprecedented health and socioeconomic burden [1,2]. The virus was first reported in Italy in early 2020 and spread rapidly across the whole country in consecutive waves, causing thousands of hospitalizations and deaths [3,4].
In response to the epidemiological situation and drawing on previous experience of infectious disease control, the Italian government adopted a series of control measures to restrict the spread of the virus, such as restriction of movements, obligatory use of facial masks, contact tracing for early warning, and specific methods of environmental control measures, that were applied beside the routine microbiological checks [5,6,7,8].
Inevitably, these measures had substantial effects on citizens’ lifestyle, health, and psychophysical well-being. Several studies have been conducted in Italy to assess behavioral changes during lockdowns and throughout the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the general population and in specific populations such as healthcare workers (HCWs) [9,10,11]. With few exceptions, these studies report increasing psychological distress and the adoption of unhealthy behaviors, especially related to diet and physical activity (PA).
In particular for HCWs, several studies have showed how severely well-being has been affected during the pandemic in Italy. It was demonstrated that HCWs living in the most affected regions had a prevalence of psychological distress higher than their colleagues from the rest of the country; moreover, significant differences related to life changes were associated with the lockdown [12]. Another study revealed that one year after the beginning of COVID-19 emergency, Italian nurses were at the greatest risk of anxiety and depression, whereas residents were at the greatest risk of burnout, and working in intensive care units was associated with an increased risk of developing severe emotional exhaustion and a cynical attitude towards work [13].
A repeated cross-sectional study shows that one year after the baseline evaluation, Italian HCWs reported an increased workload, isolation at work and in their social life, and a lack of time for physical activity and meditation [14]. The level of these working-related unhealthy effects was higher in HCWs who directly managed the COVID-19 emergency compared to those who were not directly involved [15].
In this context, public health workers (PHWs) are health care workers dealing with preventive medicine and health promotion. With regard to the pandemic, apart from the managing role of evaluating and providing the best setting-specific procedures for disease prevention, PHWs were responsible for some crucial and direct control measures such as contact tracing and related screening by molecular testing targeted to both the general population (in drive-thru testing centers) and home quarantined contacts. Moreover, PHWs were responsible for the immunization campaigns when the first vaccines became available (vaccinating dozens of millions of Italians). Therefore, PHWs were not involved in the “clinical” management of severe cases of diseases, but they have had contact with COVID-19 patients and filled a role of high responsibility in the disease control. To our knowledge, while some studies have been published regarding the pandemic’s effects on HCWs, no studies have analyzed health-related behaviors adopted by PHWs during the pandemic.
The aim of this study was to explore lifestyle changes that have occurred since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italian PHWs joining the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health (SItI) and to investigate associations between the self-reported changes and participants’ sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics. A second phase of the study will be conducted in November 2022 to test long-term self-reported consequences of the pandemic.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants and Setting

SItI represents PHWs working in both public national health system and in research institutions such as universities and public health institutions. In November 2021, the society’s annual meeting was held in Lecce, southern Italy. Meeting attendees were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire. Participation was voluntary and attendees were informed that the completion of the questionnaire implied informed consent for data collection and treatment.
We considered as the target population the total number of PHWs joining the SItI (2240 PHWs). Based on the reference population and assuming a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence level, the minimum sample size was estimated at 328 PHWs.
This study was performed in accordance with the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the scientific institutional review board of the Italian Inter University Research Centre “Population, environment and health” (approval number: 2810_2021).

2.2. Questionnaire

The questionnaire design was based on tools used in previous studies [16,17,18] and modified to fit the target population. The questionnaire was reviewed by a panel of experts comprising one epidemiologist, one public health professional, one psychologist, one expert in nutrition and movement sciences.
Moreover, the intelligibility of the questions was evaluated by asking a small separate sample to assign a 7 point score from 7 (very meaningful) to 1 (not meaningful at all) to each question. To this purpose, the original questionnaire, reporting the standard questions (SQ) was revised: 10 adjunct questions (AQs), reporting both semantic and grammatical errors, were added to the standard questions. The mean score for each SQ was >6 and for each AQ was <2. Therefore, the content of the questionnaire was considered clear to readers.
A preliminary pilot study involving 48 people was carried out to test the questionnaire’s validity (data not published). Three sections were developed:

2.2.1. Personal Information

The first section recorded sociodemographic information such as gender, age, work institution (research/healthcare service institution), and living conditions (alone/with parents/with friends or colleagues/with partner/with parents and underage children/with parents and adult children). Participants were also asked to self-report their weight and height to enable calculation of body mass index (BMI) and related weight status (underweight/normal/weight/overweight/obese) according to the World Health Organization classification [19].

2.2.2. Self-Reported Current Behaviors

The second questionnaire section comprised questions about current behaviors. Participants were asked to report if they smoked (no/yes); for how many days/weeks they ate sweet foods; if they engaged in PA (no/walking or cycling for commuting/walking or cycling for leisure/doing exercise or sport outdoors/doing exercise or sport in indoor facilities/doing exercise or sport at home); and how much they watched TV, used a smartphone, used a tablet/PC (<1/1/2/3/4/≥5 h/day), and slept (≤5/6/7/8/≥9 h/night) at the time of the investigation. Cronbach’s alpha (internal consistency coefficient) was used to test the reliability of both the pilot and final study [20]. The alpha values for this section showed a good level of reliability (0.74 and 0.70, for the pilot and the final study respectively) [21].

2.2.3. Self-Reported Current Behaviors Changes during the Pandemic

The third section of the questionnaire assessed lifestyle changes during the pandemic. Participants were asked to report changes in work activity (no change/more remote work/more onsite work); smoking habits (stopped/decreased/no change/started/increased); dietary habits (improved/no change/worsened); sweet food consumption (decreased/no change/started/increased); body weight (decreased/no change/increased); PA (started/increased/no change/decreased); time spent watching TV, using a smartphone, using a tablet/PC (decreased/no change/increased); and sleep time (increased/no change/decreased). In addition, for this section, the Cronbach’s alpha values showed a good level of reliability (0.86 and 0.82 for the pilot and the final study respectively) [21].
In addition, participants were asked a question about their COVID-19 vaccination status (“How many doses of COVID-19 vaccine have you received so far?”).

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Descriptive analysis was performed on participant sociodemographic, anthropometric, and behavioral characteristics. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean value ± standard deviation. Categorical variables and responses were reported as the number and percentage of respondents. Gender comparisons were performed using the chi-square test. Kendall’s correlation analysis was used to identify possible relationships between sociodemographic, anthropometric, and behavioral characteristics and vaccination status. To this aim, gender was categorized as female = 0 and male = 1; age as <median value = 0 and ≥median value = 1; research institution = 0, healthcare institution = 1; living alone = 0, with parents = 1, with friends/colleagues = 2, with partner = 3, with parents and underage children = 4, with parents and adult children = 5; BMI as underweight = 0, normal weight = 1, overweight = 2, and obese = 3; non-smoker = 0, smoker = 1; and PA non-engagement = 0, walking/cycling for commuting = 1, walking/cycling for leisure = 2, exercise/sport outdoors = 3, exercise/sport in indoor facilities = 4, exercise/sport at home = 5. Days/week of sweet food consumption and hours/day of watching TV, using a smartphone, using a tablet/PC, and sleeping hours/night were categorized according to their corresponding frequencies. Lifestyle changes were categorized as follows: no changes in work activity = 0, more remote work = 1, more onsite work = 2; smoking stopped = 0, decreased = 1, no change = 2, started = 3, increased = 4; dietary habits improved = 0, no change = 1, worsened = 2; sweet food consumption decreased = 0, no change = 1, started = 2, increased = 3; body weight and time spent watching TV, using a smartphone, and using a tablet/PC decreased = 0, no change = 1, increased = 2; PA engagement started = 0, increased = 1, no change = 2, decreased = 3; sleep time decreased = 0, no change = 1, increased = 2.
A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with lifestyle worsening. Changes in smoking; sweet food consumption; diet; weight; PA; time spent watching TV, using a smartphone, and using a tablet/PC; and sleep time were considered dependent variables and codified as improved/no change = 0, worsened = 1. Gender, age, work institution, living conditions, and changes in work activity were considered as independent variables.
A p-value of 0.05 was assumed to indicate significance. Analyses were performed using the software IBM SPSS version 27 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

Of 1463 PHWs attending the society meeting, 1024 completed the questionnaire. After data cleaning, 1000 questionnaire were deemed complete and correctly filled in and were used for analysis. Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the sample.
The sample comprised mainly women, individuals working in research institutions, and individuals living alone or with parents. The mean age was 40 years (approximate range: 20–80 years).
Table 2 shows participant responses about current lifestyle behaviors and characteristics, and the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received at the time of the investigation.
Regarding lifestyle characteristics and behaviors, most participants were of normal weight and non-smokers. However, approximately one-third of participants reported the consumption of sweet foods every day (30%) and did not engage in PA (34.6%). A high percentage of participants had a total screen time reaching/exceeding 5 h/day (83.1%) and slept at least 6 h/night (88.7%). Most PHWs had received at least two COVID-19 vaccine doses at the time of the investigation. Significant gender differences were found for BMI, smoking, PA, time spent using tablets/PCs, and vaccine dose. Regarding these aspects, women showed more healthy behaviors than men, with the exception of PA and using tablets/PCs. A higher proportion of male respondents reported a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
Table 3 highlights changes in participants’ lifestyles during the pandemic.
Most participants reported changes (including increases and decreases) in work activity, PA (almost 39% reported decreased PA), and time spent using tablets/PCs (increased in more than 56% of the sample). Regarding work, an equal percentage of participants (26.2%) declared increases in remote and onsite work. The proportions of participants who reported no change versus a decrease in PA were similar. The gender comparison showed that women experienced higher changes than men in dietary habits, sweet food consumption, time spent watching TV and using smartphone, and in sleep time.
The correlation analyses showed that current smoking was negatively related to age (tau-b = −0.090, p = 0.004), living conditions (tau-b = −0.079, p = 0.005), current PA (tau-b = −0.070, p = 0.014), and sleep time (tau-b = −0.066, p = 0.023), and positively related to gender (tau-b = 0.070, p = 0.027), current TV watching (tau-b = 0.064, p = 0.027), smartphone use (tau-b = 0.148, p < 0.001), and total screen time (tau-b = 0.074, p = 0.006). Current smoking was also related to changes during the pandemic in work activity (tau-b = 0.082, p = 0.006) and weight (tau-b = 0.071, p = 0.018).
Current consumption of sweet foods was negatively related to current PA (tau-b = −0.094, p < 0.001) and positively related to current TV watching (tau-b = 0.081, p = 0.002), smartphone use (tau-b = 0.065, p = 0.009). This variable was also related to pandemic changes in weight (tau-b = 0.082, p = 0.002), dietary habits (tau-b = 0.147, p < 0.001), sweet food consumption (tau-b = 0.155, p < 0.001), and PA (tau-b = 0.058, p = 0.028).
Current PA was negatively related to age (tau-b = −0.086, p = 0.003), BMI (tau-b = −0.190, p < 0.001), living conditions (tau-b = −0.074, p = 0.003), and current sweet food consumption (tau-b = −0.094, p < 0.001). Current PA was also related to pandemic changes in smoking (tau-b = −0.150, p = 0.019), diet (tau-b = −0.197, p < 0.001), sweet food consumption (tau-b = −0.144, p < 0.001), and PA (tau-b = −0.175, p < 0.001).
Current total screen time was positively related to current consumption of sweet foods (tau-b = 0.080, p = 0.001) and smoking (tau-b = 0.074, p = 0.006) and to pandemic changes in work activity (tau-b = 0.091, p < 0.001), PA (tau-b = 0.080, p = 0.002), dietary habits (tau-b = 0.105, p < 0.001), sweet food consumption (tau-b = 0.084, p = 0.001), and sleep time (tau-b = 0.063, p = 0.017).
Current sleep time was negatively related to age (tau-b = −0.172, p < 0.001), BMI (tau-b = −0.071, p = 0.011), living conditions (tau-b = −0.073, p = 0.004), and current smoking (tau-b = −0.066, p = 0.023). Current sleep time was also related to pandemic changes in weight (tau-b = −0.055, p = 0.044), dietary habits (tau-b = −0.074, p = 0.008), and sleep (tau-b = −0.276, p < 0.001), and positively related to current time spent watching TV (tau-b = 0.093, p = 0.001).
Table 4 shows the results of the logistic regression analysis.
These results show that increased smoking was positively associated with living with parents and underage children and negatively associated with an increase in remote working during the pandemic. Worsening diet, sweet food consumption, body weight, and PA were more common in younger participants and less frequent in those who worked in research institutions. Dietary and sweet food consumption changes were also associated with living with a partner and adult children. Remote working was positively associated with diet worsening. Female gender was positively related to sweet food consumption. Living with friends/colleagues was negatively related to weight increase and positively related to PA decrease during the pandemic. Regarding screen time, increased TV watching, and smartphone use were associated with an increase in onsite working, and tablet/PC use was related to living with a partner and underage children and to increase in both onsite and remote working. Sleep worsening was negatively related to working in a research institution and with living with a partner and adult children and positively associated with an increase in remote working.

4. Discussion

This study identified the self-reported lifestyle changes experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic by Italian PHWs, professionals responsible for health promotion and disease prevention policies. During the last 2 years, these frontline workers have implemented policies to control the spread of COVID-19, particularly policies related to the national COVID-19 immunization campaign.
Several studies have been conducted on the effect of the pandemic on HCWs, focusing on contagion and deaths, adherence to control measures, and psychological effects; however, few studies have investigated the effect of the pandemic on lifestyle [11,22]. To the best of our knowledge, none of these studies have specifically investigated PHWs.
The main findings of this study show that the current health-related habits and characteristics of this population differ in some respects from those of the general Italian population. In fact, although most participants did not smoke and were of normal weight at the time of the investigation, a substantial proportion were physically inactive and reported daily sweet food consumption.
A 2020 Italian Institute of Statistics report showed that of the general Italian population of the same age category as our sample, approximately 18.2% were smokers, approximately 47% were overweight/obese, and approximately 31.6% did not engage in PA [23]. Our sample showed the same percentage of smokers as in the general Italian population, a lower proportion of overweight/obese participants, and a higher proportion of inactive participants.
Regarding gender differences, women had healthier lifestyles than men, with the exception of PA and time spent using tablets/PCs. This finding is inconsistent with a study of Italian undergraduate students, which showed that being female was associated with the achievement of recommended PA levels even during lockdown [18]. This difference could be explained by factors not investigated in the present study, such as psychological conditions more frequently observed in female HCWs than in the general population [24].
The aim of the present study was to assess changes in PHW lifestyle during the pandemic. The observed changes in weight, diet, PA, and sleep were more positive than those found in a previous study of Italian older adults [25]. In another study performed among Italian not-HCWs, a lower percentage of participants reported a decrease in PA [18]. Although that study investigated only individuals of a narrow age range and was restricted to the lockdown period, comparison with the present findings confirms the differences between PHWs and the general Italian population.
Our findings on changes in PA, screen time, and sleep are consistent with the results of a previous Italian study that found substantial differences between HCWs and the general population [11]. However, a comparison of previous results for HCWs and the present data show differences between HCWs and PHWs.
Regarding smoking, more than 15% of our sample started, maintained, or increased smoking, higher than the 4.4% of smokers reported in a study of HCWs [22]. A web-based survey study found that during the lockdown, individuals marginally consumed more cigarettes (7.4%) compared with before the lockdown; however, participants to that study were part of an unselected sample and, therefore, not restricted to HCWs [26]. This result is important because smoking is one of the factors associated with lower antibody titers following COVID-19 vaccination [27]. In fact, smoking is associated with reduced immune system function, which is related to the development of autoimmune disease and reduced response to infection [28].
Regarding dietary habits, 75% of our sample showed either no change or adopted a healthier diet. This percentage was lower than that found in other studies, which have reported levels of healthier eating up to 96.8% in HCWs [22]. This finding is of note considering the importance of a good diet for health and particularly for protection against COVID-19. In a study of HCWs in six European countries, plant-based or pescatarian diets were associated with lower likelihood of developing moderate-to-severe COVID-19, suggesting that a balanced diet protects against severe COVID-19 [29]. This is probably because a healthy diet supports the immune system (e.g., by increasing antibody production and lymphocyte proliferation) and reduces oxidative stress [30]. Both specific micronutrient deficiencies and generalized malnutrition are associated with host immune dysfunction [31]. Moreover, the COVID-19 virus may be affected by host nutritional deficiency; it may be more virulent if it replicates in a nutritionally deficient host [29]. Moreover, there is preliminary evidence that some nutrients may modulate stress resilience in humans [32], which could help in planning healthy meals for HCWs [33].
We found that 61.1% of our sample experienced unchanged or increased PA levels during the pandemic. This percentage is lower than that found in other studies, which report PA levels of up to 68.2% in HCWs [22]. Almost 40% of our sample reported a reduction in PA. This is consistent with a study conducted in Singapore that demonstrated pandemic-related PA reduction [24]. PA reduction is a substantial risk factor for mild stress and moderate-to-severe depression [24]. A study by Woods et al. demonstrated that HCWs may have increased susceptibility to COVID-19 owing to weakened antiviral defenses from the prolonged disruption of PA [34].
Many HCWs lack access to PA because of an increase in work and lockdown restrictions. However, indoor exercise is recommended in these situations, following the World Health Organization 2020 Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour [24,35]. Interventions, such as sprint interval training to increase cardiorespiratory fitness and in-hospital promotion of PA (e.g., by making bicycles available in open spaces), can improve PA in HCWs [24,35].
Our data on the number of that received doses of the COVID-19 vaccine are heartening: most participants had received at least two doses. Only five participants had not been vaccinated at all. These individuals may have had vaccine contraindications and probably accessed by using negative swab test certification. These data are interesting because PHWs are one of the most important sources of vaccination information for the general public [36]. In particular, PHWs are engaged to promote immunization in different healthcare settings and to develop effective communication toolkits and educational materials about vaccination [36].
We found several significant correlations among PHW lifestyle characteristics. In particular, the different aspects of screen time were associated with smoking and sweet food consumption. Other studies have reported a clustering of unhealthy behaviors during the pandemic and have identified associations between such behaviors and mental health indicators [37,38].
The correlation analysis also suggested a possible association between changes during the pandemic and current behaviors. In particular, current sweet food consumption, PA, and sleep were associated with changes in the same behaviors in the last 2 years. These data agree with recent study findings [39].
The regression analysis confirmed some of these relationships and emphasized the effects of changes in work activity on health-related behaviors, as reported in previous studies [40]. In particular, a positive association was found between an increase in remote working and worsening diet and sleep, and with increased time spent on tablets/PCs.
These findings provide new perspectives on the effects of work changes on Italian PHWs lifestyle and health.
There are several study limitations. The survey was performed using a non-standard questionnaire. Although the questionnaire was structured on the basis of the tools used in previous studies and validated in terms of intelligibility and reliability, this represents the first limitation of the study. Secondly, the cross-sectional design of the study limits its validity in assessing temporal relationship between exposure and outcome. The questionnaire was administrated once, and self-report data were used, which make it prone to recall, reporting, and desirability biases; therefore, some of the effects may have been overestimated or underestimated. Anyway, a second evaluation is foreseen during the next SItI national congress that will be held in Padua in November 2022, as part of a repeated two-point cross-sectional survey. This methodology has been already used in previous studies, enabling to follow variations over time in the response of HCWs to the pressure posed by the COVID-19 pandemic [13,14,15]. Third, due to the reference population considered, the findings cannot be extended to the whole population of HCWs in Italy. Furthermore, in our study, being vaccinated and participating to a congress held in person in an epidemiological situation that at the time of the study was characterized by a low number of infections after the third wave end may have influenced respondents’ believing about the pandemic and answers about their own behaviors. For the same reasons we did not evaluated the number of PHWs experiencing the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the related health consequences. With regard to this aspect, it has been already demonstrated that HCWs believing in vaccinations would help control the impact of pandemic on their well-being, since immunized workers probably felt able to resume social activities [14]. Finally, the questionnaire was aimed only at exploring socio-demographic and behavioral aspects and did not include questions about psychological or physical health status of participants. Considering that these may have consequences on the individuals’ behaviors, this represents an important flaw of the study. Despite these potential biases, the use of a large sample of respondent PHWs from different Italian institutions strengthen the usefulness of our findings.
Integrative and multidisciplinary approaches are required to improve health-related behaviors in PHWs. Increasing health literacy in HCWs could help to achieve this goal [22], but also urban design may contribute to health-well-being, creating new models of health promotion [41]. This would further contribute to reducing the negative lifestyle consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.

5. Conclusions

The present findings identified several differences between the lifestyles of Italian PHWs and those of the general Italian general population. Current PHW behavior may be a result of changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in work activity, as the workload of PHWs has greatly increased to cope with the COVID-19 waves in Italy. Further studies are needed to explore in depth PHW behaviors and to identify appropriate health promotion measures to support the adoption of healthy lifestyles in this population during global health emergencies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, M.T.M., C.N. and F.G.; validation, M.T.M., C.N. and F.G.; investigation, M.T.M., A.Q., G.D., F.G., O.D.G., G.C., C.N., M.D.M., G.L., P.S. and G.B.O.; data curation, A.Q. and G.D.; formal analysis, F.G. and C.N.; writing—original draft preparation, C.N. and F.G.; writing—review and editing, M.T.M., C.N., F.G., A.Q., G.D., O.D.G., G.C., M.D.M., G.L., P.S. and G.B.O.; funding acquisition, M.T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the scientific institutional review board of the Italian Inter University Research Centre “Population, environment and health” (approval number: 2810_2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data presented are available upon request from the corresponding author (C.N.).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the participants to the study. We thank Diane Williams from Edanz for the language editing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  2. Nicola, M.; Alsafi, Z.; Sohrabi, C.; Kerwan, A.; Al-Jabir, A.; Iosifidis, C.; Agha, M.; Agha, R. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. Int. J. Surg. 2020, 78, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Italy. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/region/euro/country/it (accessed on 12 December 2021).
  4. Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Epidemia COVID-19. Aggiornamento Nazionale. Available online: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/sars-cov-2-dashboard (accessed on 12 December 2021).
  5. Presidency of the Italian Council of Ministries. Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 13 Ottobre 2020. Ulteriori Disposizioni Attuative del Decreto-Legge 25 Marzo 2020, n. 19, Convertito, con Modificazioni, dalla Legge 25 Maggio 2020, n. 35, Recante «Misure Urgenti per Fronteggiare L’emergenza Epidemiologica da COVID-19», e del Decreto-Legge 16 Maggio 2020, n. 33, Convertito, con Modificazioni, dalla Legge 14 Luglio 2020, n. 74, Recante «Ulteriori Misure Urgenti per Fronteggiare L’emergenza Epidemiologica da COVID-19». (20A05563) (GU Serie Generale n.253 del 13-10-2020). Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/10/13/20A05563/sg (accessed on 12 December 2021).
  6. Napoli, C.; Riccardo, F.; Declich, S.; Dente, M.G.; Pompa, M.G.; Rizzo, C.; Rota, M.C.; Bella, A.; National Working Group. An early warning system based on syndromic surveillance to detect potential health emergencies among migrants: Results of a two-year experience in Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 8529–8541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  7. Gola, M.; Caggiano, G.; de Giglio, O.; Napoli, C.; Diella, G.; Carlucci, M.; Carpagnano, L.F.; D’Alessandro, D.; Joppolo, C.M.; Capolongo, S.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 indoor contamination: Considerations on anti-COVID-19 management of ventilation systems, and finishing materials in healthcare facilities. Ann. Ig. 2021, 33, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Caggiano, G.; Napoli, C.; Coretti, C.; Lovero, G.; Scarafile, G.; de Giglio, O.; Montagna, M.T. Mold contamination in a controlled hospital environment: A 3-year surveillance in southern Italy. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  9. Bonaccio, M.; Costanzo, S.; Bracone, F.; Gialluisi, A.; Di Castelnuovo, A.; Ruggiero, E.; Esposito, S.; Olivieri, M.; Persichillo, M.; Cerletti, C.; et al. Moli-LOCK Study Investigators. Psychological distress resulting from the COVID-19 confinement is associated with unhealthy dietary changes in two Italian population-based cohorts. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Catucci, A.; Scognamiglio, U.; Rossi, L. Lifestyle changes related to eating habits, physical activity, and weight status during COVID-19 quarantine in Italy and some European countries. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 718877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mansueto, G.; Lopes, F.L.; Grassi, L.; Cosci, F. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on Italian healthcare workers versus general population: Results from an online survey. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 2021, 28, 1334–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Sio, S.; La Torre, G.; Buomprisco, G.; Lapteva, E.; Perri, R.; Corbosiero, P.; Ferraro, P.; GiovannettI, A.; Greco, E.; Cedrone, F. Consequences of COVID19-pandemic lockdown on Italian occupational physicians’ psychosocial health. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0243194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lasalvia, A.; Bodini, L.; Amaddeo, F.; Porru, S.; Carta, A.; Poli, R.; Bonetto, C. The Sustained Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Workers One Year after the Outbreak-A Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey in a Tertiary Hospital of North-East Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 13374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Magnavita, N.; Soave, P.M.; Antonelli, M. A One-Year Prospective Study of Work-Related Mental Health in the Intensivists of a COVID-19 Hub Hospital. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Di Mattei, V.E.; Perego, G.; Milano, F.; Mazzetti, M.; Taranto, P.; di Pierro, R.; de Panfilis, C.; Madeddu, F.; Preti, E. The “Healthcare Workers’ Wellbeing (Benessere Operatori)” Project: A Picture of the Mental Health Conditions of Italian Healthcare Workers during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tebar, W.R.; Christofaro, D.; Diniz, T.A.; Lofrano-Prado, M.C.; Botero, J.P.; Correia, M.A.; Cucato, G.G.; Ritti-Dias, R.M.; do Prado, W.L. Increased screen time is associated with alcohol desire and sweetened foods consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 630586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Colley, R.C.; Bushnik, T.; Langlois, K. Exercise and screen time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Rep. 2020, 31, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Gallè, F.; Sabella, E.A.; Ferracuti, S.; de Giglio, O.; Caggiano, G.; Protano, C.; Valeriani, F.; Parisi, E.A.; Valerio, G.; Liguori, G.; et al. Sedentary behaviors and physical activity of Italian undergraduate students during lockdown at the time of CoViD-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. World Health Organization. Body Mass Index—BMI. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi (accessed on 30 November 2021).
  20. Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  21. Taber, K.S. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res. Sci. Ed. 2018, 48, 1273–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Do, B.N.; Tran, T.V.; Phan, D.T.; Nguyen, H.C.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, H.C.; Ha, T.H.; Dao, H.K.; Trinh, M.V.; Do, T.V.; et al. Health literacy, ehealth literacy, adherence to infection prevention and control procedures, lifestyle changes, and suspected COVID-19 symptoms among health care workers during lockdown: Online survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e22894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Istituto Italiano di Statistica. Aspetti della Vita Quotidiana. Indagine 2020. Available online: http://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?QueryId=15512 (accessed on 21 December 2021).
  24. Kua, Z.; Hamzah, F.; Tan, P.T.; Ong, L.J.; Tan, B.; Huang, Z. Physical activity levels and mental health burden of healthcare workers during COVID-19 lockdown. Stress Health 2021, 38, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gallè, F.; Sabella, E.A.; Roma, P.; Ferracuti, S.; Da Molin, G.; Diella, G.; Montagna, M.T.; Orsi, G.B.; Liguori, G.; Napoli, C. Knowledge and lifestyle behaviors related to COVID-19 pandemic in people over 65 years old from southern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vanderbruggen, N.; Matthys, F.; van Laere, S.; Zeeuws, D.; Santermans, L.; van den Ameele, S.; Crunelle, C.L. Self-reported alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis use during COVID-19 lockdown measures: Results from a web-based survey. Eur. Addict. Res. 2020, 26, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Watanabe, M.; Balena, A.; Tuccinardi, D.; Tozzi, R.; Risi, R.; Masi, D.; Caputi, A.; Rossetti, R.; Spoltore, M.E.; Filippi, V.; et al. Central obesity, smoking habit, and hypertension are associated with lower antibody titres in response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2021, 38, e3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qiu, F.; Liang, C.L.; Liu, H.; Zeng, Y.Q.; Hou, S.; Huang, S.; Lai, X.; Dai, Z. Impacts of cigarette smoking on immune responsiveness: Up and down or upside down? Oncotarget 2017, 8, 268–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  29. Kim, H.; Rebholz, C.M.; Hegde, S.; LaFiura, C.; Raghavan, M.; Lloyd, J.F.; Cheng, S.; Seidelmann, S.B. Plant-based diets, pescatarian diets and COVID-19 severity: A population-based case-control study in six countries. BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2021, 4, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Calder, P.C. Nutrition, immunity and COVID-19. BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2020, 3, 74–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Calder, P.C.; Carr, A.C.; Gombart, A.F.; Eggersdorfer, M. Optimal nutritional status for a well-functioning immune system is an important factor to protect against viral infections. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  32. Taylor, A.M.; Thompson, S.V.; Edwards, C.G.; Musaad, S.M.A.; Khan, N.A.; Holscher, H.D. Associations among diet, the gastrointestinal microbiota, and negative emotional states in adults. Nutr. Neurosci. 2020, 23, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rajkumar, R.P. Harnessing the neurobiology of resilience to protect the mental well-being of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 621853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Woods, J.A.; Hutchinson, N.T.; Powers, S.K.; Roberts, W.O.; Gomez-Cabrera, M.C.; Radak, Z.; Ji, L.L.; Boros, A.; Boldogh, I.; Leeuwenburgh, C.; et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and physical activity. Sports Med. Health Sci. 2020, 2, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bull, F.C.; Al-Ansari, S.S.; Biddle, S.; Borodulin, K.; Buman, M.P.; Cardon, G.; Willumsen, J.F.; Chaput, J.-P.; Chastin, S.; Chou, R.; et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Brit. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Montagna, M.T.; de Giglio, O.; Napoli, C.; Fasano, F.; Diella, G.; Donnoli, R.; Caggiano, G.; Tafuri, S.; Lopalco, P.L.; Agodi, A.; et al. Adherence to vaccination policy among public health professionals: Results of a national survey in Italy. Vaccines 2020, 8, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Werneck, A.O.; Silva, D.R.; Malta, D.C.; Souza-Júnior, P.; Azevedo, L.O.; Barros, M.; Szwarcwald, C.L. Changes in the clustering of unhealthy movement behaviors during the COVID-19 quarantine and the association with mental health indicators among Brazilian adults. Transl. Behav. Med. 2021, 11, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Christofaro, D.; Werneck, A.O.; Tebar, W.R.; Lofrano-Prado, M.C.; Botero, J.P.; Cucato, G.G.; Malik, N.; Correia, M.A.; Ritti-Dias, R.M.; Prado, W.L. Physical activity is associated with improved eating habits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 664568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Breiner, C.E.; Miller, M.L.; Hormes, J.M. Changes in eating and exercise behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community sample: A retrospective report. Eat. Behav. 2021, 42, 101539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mata, J.; Wenz, A.; Rettig, T.; Reifenscheid, M.; Möhring, K.; Krieger, U.; Friedel, S.; Fikel, M.; Cornesse, C.; Blom, A.G.; et al. Health behaviors and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal population-based survey in Germany. Soc. Sci. Med. 2021, 287, 114333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Balletto, G.; Borruso, G.; Milesi, A.; Ladu, M.; Castiglia, P.; Dettori, M.; Arghittu, A. Sport-City Planning. A Proposal for an Index to Support Decision-Making Practice: Principles and Strategies. In Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2021; ICCSA 2021, Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Gervasi, O., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 12952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of participants (n = 1000).
Table 1. Characteristics of participants (n = 1000).
VariableParticipants
Gender
n (%)
men365 (36.5)
women635 (63.5)
Age (years) mean ± SD
(range)		40 ± 13.1
(23–79)
Work institution
n (%)
research581 (58.1)
healthcare419 (41.9)
Living conditions
n (%)
alone202 (20.2)
with parents198 (19.8)
with friends/colleagues104 (10.4)
with partner210 (21)
with parents and underage children169 (16.9)
with parents and adult children117 (11.7)
SD, standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Current health-related conditions and behaviors for the total sample and grouped by gender.
Table 2. Current health-related conditions and behaviors for the total sample and grouped by gender.
Lifestyle VariableWhole Sample
n = 1000
n (%)		Men
n = 365		Women
n = 635		p-Value
BMI category <0.001
underweight64 (6.4)1 (0.3)63 (9.9)
normal weight665 (66.5)214 (58.6)451 (71)
overweight216 (21.6)126 (34.5)90 (14.2)
obese55 (5.5)24 (6.6)31 (4.9)
Smoking habit 0.027
no819 (81.9)286 (78.4)533 (84)
yes181 (18.1)79 (21.6)102 (16)
Weekly days of sweet food consumption 0.955
027 (2.7)10 (2.7)17 (2.7)
197 (9.7)37 (10.1)60 (9.4)
2158 (15.8)55 (15.1)102 (16.1)
3145 (14.5)48 (13.2)97 (15.3)
497 (9.7)33 (9)64 (10.1)
5112 (11.2)43 (11.8)69 (10.9)
664 (6.4)23 (6.3)41 (6.4)
7300 (30)116 (31.8)185 (29.1)
Physical activity engagement 0.001
no346 (34.6)105 (28.8)241 (38)
walking/cycling for commuting215 (21.5)97 (26.6)118 (18.6)
walking/cycling for leisure60 (6)28 (7.7)32 (5)
exercise/sport outdoors87 (8.7)38 (10.4)49 (7.7)
exercise/sport in indoor facilities220 (22)78 (21.4)142 (22.4)
exercise/sport at home72 (7.2)19 (5.2)53 (8.3)
Time spent watching TV
hours/day		 0.111
<1407 (40.7)143 (39.2)264 (41.6)
1258 (25.8)99 (27.1)159 (25)
2208 (20.8)78 (21.4)130 (20.5)
389 (8.9)25 (6.8)64 (10.1)
422 (2.2)10 (2.7)12 (1.9)
≥516 (1.6)10 (2.7)6 (0.9)
Time spent using smartphone
hours/day		 0.734
<161 (6.1)26 (7.1)35 (5.5)
1203 (20.3)77 (21.1)126 (19.8)
2233 (23.3)87 (23.8)146 (23)
3215 (21.5)76 (20.8)139 (21.9)
4139 (13.9)44 (12.1)95 (15)
≥5149 (14.9)55 (15.1)94 (14.8)
Time spent using tablet/PC
hours/day		 0.004
<163 (6.3)22 (6)41 (6.5)
190 (9)42 (11.6)48 (7.5)
2128 (12.8)50 (13.7)78 (12.3)
3124 (12.4)49 (13.4)75 (11.8)
4120 (12)56 (15.3)64 (10.1)
≥5475 (47.5)146 (40)329 (51.8)
Total screen time
hours/day		 0.078
<13 (0.3)2 (0.5)1 (0.2)
17 (0.7)0 (0)7 (1.1)
233 (3.3)14 (3.8)19 (3)
353 (5.3)25 (6.8)28 (4.4)
473 (7.3)28 (7.7)45 (7.1)
≥5831 (83.1)296 (81.1)535 (84.2)
Sleep time
hours/night		 0.073
≤5113 (11.3)41 (11.2)72 (11.3)
6288 (28.8)117 (32.1)171 (26.9)
7351 (35.1)118 (32.3)233 (36.7)
8221 (22.1)81 (22.2)140 (22.1)
≥927 (2.7)8 (2.2)19 (3)
Doses of COVID-19 vaccine 0.005
05 (0.5)0 (0)5 (0.8)
123 (2.3)9 (2.5)14 (2.2)
2715 (71.5)241 (66)474 (74.6)
3257 (25.7)115 (31.5)142 (22.4)
BMI, body mass index.
Table
Table 3. Lifestyle changes during the pandemic for the total sample and grouped by gender.
Table 3. Lifestyle changes during the pandemic for the total sample and grouped by gender.
Lifestyle VariableWhole Sample
n = 1000
n (%)		Men
n = 365
n (%)		Women
n = 635
n (%)		p-Value
Work activity
no change476 (47.6)187 (51.2)289 (45.5)0.205
more remote262 (26.2)91 (24.9)171 (26.9)
more onsite262 (26.2)87 (23.8)175 (27.6)
Smoking habit 0.273
stopped21 (2.1)9 (2.5)12 (1.9)
decreased17 (1.7)8 (2.2)9 (1.4)
no change106 (10.6)40 (10.9)65 (10.2)
started18 (1.8)10 (2.7)8 (1.2)
increased40 (4)21 (5.8)19 (3)
Dietary habits
improved164 (16.4)46 (12.6)118 (18.6)0.021
no change592 (59.2)234 (64.1)358 (56.4)
worsened244 (24.4)85 (23.3)159 (25)
Sweet food consumption
decreased115 (11.5)37 (10.1)78 (12.3)0.039
no change650 (65)258 (70.7)392 (61.7)
started18 (1.8)5 (1.4)13 (2.1)
increased217 (21.7)65 (17.8)152 (23.9)
Body weight 0.216
decreased201 (20.1)65 (17.8)136 (21.4)
no change502 (50.2)180 (49.3)322 (50.7)
increased297 (29.7)120 (32.9)177 (27.9)
Physical activity 0.413
started16 (1.6)5 (1.4)11 (1.7)
increased205 (20.5)65 (17.8)140 (22)
no change390 (39)147 (40.3)243 (38.3)
decreased389 (38.9)148 (40.5)241 (38)
Time spent watching TV 0.013
decreased245 (24.5)72 (19.7)173 (27.2)
no change636 (63.6)257 (70.4)379 (59.7)
increased119 (11.9)36 (9.9)83 (13.1)
Time spent using smartphone 0.008
decreased45 (4.5)9 (2.5)36 (5.7)
no change503 (50.3)204 (55.9)298 (46.9)
increased452 (45.2)152 (41.6)301 (47.4)
Time spent using tablet/PC 0.215
decreased41 (4.1)21 (5.8)20 (3.2)
no change393 (39.3)144 (22.6)249 (39.2)
increased566 (56.6)200 (54.8)366 (57.6)
Sleep time 0.029
increased59 (5.9)13 (3.6)46 (7.3)
no change614 (61.4)238 (65.2)376 (59.2)
decreased327 (32.7)114 (31.2)213 (33.5)
Table
Table 4. Results of the multivariate regression analysis of lifestyle worsening during the pandemic.
Table 4. Results of the multivariate regression analysis of lifestyle worsening during the pandemic.
Independent
Variables		SmokingDietSweet Food
Consumption		WeightPAWatching TVSmartphone UseTablet/PC UseSleep
Odds Ratios (95% Confidence Intervals)
Gender
women1.261 (0.845–1.882)1.038 (0.757–1.422)1.456 (1.059–2.026) *0.827 (0.620–1.103)0.860 (0.655–1.129)1.399 (0.908–2.155)1.126 (0.861–1.473)1 (0.760–1.315)1.102 (0.828–1.467)
menReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
Age
<35 years0.792 (0.476–1.319)1.874 (1.261–2.784) *1.670 (1.126–2.478) *2.004 (1.381–2.909) **1.590 (1.118–2.263) *1.213 (0.711–2.071)1.251 (0.890–1.759)1.332 (0.939–1.890)1.143 (0.798–1.638)
≥35 yearsReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
Work institution
research0.945 (0.589–1.517)0.587 (0.409–0.843) *0.608 (0.424–871) *0.711 (0.509–0.992) *0.550 (0.402–0.752) **0.790 (0.500–1.251)1.020 (0.752–1.382)0.765 (0.619–1.154)0.681 (0.494–0.939) *
healthcareReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
Living conditions
with parents1.022 (0.564–1.852)1.004 (0.629–1.602)1.001 (0.631–1.588)1.236 (0.798–1.914)1.035 (0.673–1.590)0.787 (0.413–1.501)1.158 (0.765–1.751)0.730 (0.477–1.118)0.932 (0.601–1.446)
with friends/colleagues0.623 (0.322–1.206)0.780 (0.433–1.404)0.577 (0.316–1.056)0.428 (0.232–0.790) *1.664 (1.002–2.761) *0.673 (0.309–1.466)1.545 (0.934–2.555)1.074 (0.640–1.801)0.693 (0.399–1.205)
with partner1.010 (0.570–1.789)0.993 (0.636–1.553)0.788 (0.502–1.237)1.309 (0.863–1.985)1.110 (0.740–1.665)0.931 (0.505–1.716)0.710 (0.476–1.057)0.865 (0.579–1.291)0.844 (0.556–1.283)
with partner and underage children3.023 (1.299–7.034) *0.919 (0.552–1.528)0.823 (0.497–1.366)0.856 (0.521–1.406)1.422 (0.909–2.223)0.532 (0.259–1.093)1.121 (0.726–1.730)1.684 (1.065–2.663) *1.039 (0.660–1.635)
with partner and adult children1.777 (0.771–4.096)0.326 (0.159–0.667) *0.364 (0.183–0.726) *1.032 (0.594–1.792)0.836 (0.497–1.407)1.021 (0.486–2.144)0.721 (0.437–1.190)0.872 (0.528–1.441)0.547 (0.317–0.942) *
aloneReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
Work activity
more remote0.617 (0.382–0.996) *1.982 (1.385–2.838) **1.265 (0.876–1.827)0.950 (0.672–1.345)1.306 (0.945–1.804)1.264 (0.712–2.241)1.346 (0.977–1.854)3.314 (2.358–4.656) **2.065 (1.482–2.877) **
more onsite0.718 (0.447–1.152)0.977 (0.664–1.439)0.980 (0.670–1.431)0.959 (0.677–1.357)1.088 (0.788–1.502)4.609 (2.883–7.370) **1.649 (1.205–2.258) **2.223 (1.614–3.060) **1.268 (0.903–1.781)
no changeReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
* p-Value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gallé, F.; Quaranta, A.; Napoli, C.; Diella, G.; De Giglio, O.; Caggiano, G.; Di Muzio, M.; Stefanizzi, P.; Orsi, G.B.; Liguori, G.; Montagna, M.T. How do Vaccinators Experience the Pandemic? Lifestyle Behaviors in a Sample of Italian Public Health Workers during the COVID-19 Era. Vaccines 2022, 10, 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020247

AMA Style

Gallé F, Quaranta A, Napoli C, Diella G, De Giglio O, Caggiano G, Di Muzio M, Stefanizzi P, Orsi GB, Liguori G, Montagna MT. How do Vaccinators Experience the Pandemic? Lifestyle Behaviors in a Sample of Italian Public Health Workers during the COVID-19 Era. Vaccines. 2022; 10(2):247. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020247

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gallé, Francesca, Alessia Quaranta, Christian Napoli, Giusy Diella, Osvalda De Giglio, Giuseppina Caggiano, Marco Di Muzio, Pasquale Stefanizzi, Giovanni Battista Orsi, Giorgio Liguori, and Maria Teresa Montagna. 2022. "How do Vaccinators Experience the Pandemic? Lifestyle Behaviors in a Sample of Italian Public Health Workers during the COVID-19 Era" Vaccines 10, no. 2: 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020247

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop