Next Article in Journal
Sustaining Vaccine Confidence in the 21st Century
Next Article in Special Issue
The Potential Impact of Preventive HIV Vaccines in China: Results and Benefits of a Multi-Province Modeling Collaboration
Previous Article in Journal
Hepatitis B Vaccination in Pregnancy in the United States
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Pandemic Influenza A H1N1 Vaccine amongst Essential Service Providers: A Cross Sectional Study
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Tumor-Associated Glycans and Immune Surveillance

Behjatolah Monzavi-Karbassi
Anastas Pashov
2 and
Thomas Kieber-Emmons
Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute and Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
Stephan Angeloff Institute of Microbiology, BAS, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2013, 1(2), 174-203;
Submission received: 18 April 2013 / Revised: 18 April 2013 / Accepted: 6 June 2013 / Published: 17 June 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers)


Changes in cell surface glycosylation are a hallmark of the transition from normal to inflamed and neoplastic tissue. Tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) challenge our understanding of immune tolerance, while functioning as immune targets that bridge innate immune surveillance and adaptive antitumor immunity in clinical applications. T-cells, being a part of the adaptive immune response, are the most popular component of the immune system considered for targeting tumor cells. However, for TACAs, T-cells take a back seat to antibodies and natural killer cells as first-line innate defense mechanisms. Here, we briefly highlight the rationale associated with the relative importance of the immune surveillance machinery that might be applicable for developing therapeutics.

1. Introduction

A basic premise underlying immune modalities for cancer is that the immune system can mount a rejection strength response against neoplastically transformed cells [1]. Tumor targeting draws upon two immunological mediated paradigms. The first draws upon concepts of immune surveillance that bridges both innate and adaptive immunity. According to the immune surveillance hypothesis, tumor associated antigens are regarded as “non-self” by the immune system, and a major function of the immune system is to survey the body for the development of malignancy and to eliminate tumor cells as they arise [2]. Innate immunity relies on biochemical and cellular defense mechanisms often observed in the early phases of encounter with microbes. The cellular players include natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, monocytes, γδ T-cells and natural killer T (NKT)-cells. Adaptive immunity involves the expansion of T-cells and B-cells and their humoral and cellular mediators, cytokines and antibodies. In particular, antibodies and NK cells are early participants in the immune response and are particularly effective in eliminating blood-borne metastases [3]. In contrast, T-cells are the effector cells responsible for specific, long-lasting immunity.
The second draws upon concepts associated with tissue-specific destruction in the context of acute allograft (acute) rejection, flares of autoimmunity and response to acute infection. This second paradigm requires an understanding of the distinct difference between an anti-tumor immune response and outright tumor rejection. In this context, immune-mediated cancer rejection is a facet of autoimmunity, where the target tissue is the cancer itself. The induction of immune-mediated tumor tissue rejection represents an important conceptual approach to cancer immunotherapy and also remains an important goal in tumor immunology [4,5]. Antigens that function as tumor rejection antigens are considered self, nearly self or non-self [6]. The fact that a tumor antigen elicits a tumor-specific immune response does not necessarily mean that the immune response will cause the rejection of the tumor in vivo. The question remains as to which tumor antigen can or is better at inducing a clinically beneficial response [7]. Tumor-rejection antigen is therefore an operational term describing how well an immune response elicited against a tumor antigen will impact on tumor growth. Tumor antigens can be poor, intermediate or strong tumor rejection antigens, describing quantitatively the impact of the immune response on tumor growth [6].
Among potential tumor rejection antigens are glycans expressed on glycoproteins and glycolipids. Aberrant glycosylation is a universal feature of cancer cells with some tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) considered tumor progression markers. A considerable body of evidence put TACAs amongst the most challenging of clinical targets for cancer immunotherapy [8,9], yet immune responses to glycans are noted that could lend to therapeutic strategies and approaches (Figure 1). TACA expression on cancer cells is associated with organ tropism underlying extravasation and metastases, because of glycan receptors on organ tissues [10] or their role in survival. A requisite for metastases is cell survival. Anoikis resistance or survival in the absence of attachment to extracellular matrix (ECM) is a prerequisite for the development of tumor metastases [11,12]. Anoikis resistance has evoked special attention in cancer research because circulating tumor cells in the blood stream are resistant to it. Signaling cascades are intimately interconnected with TACA expression and interaction with the microenvironment. TACAs can regulate the interaction between integrin and Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK), for example, which, in turn, regulates cancer cell adhesion and invasion [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Many of the targeted TACAs are found on structures upstream of FAK that can modulate the signaling through FAK [14,17,19,20,21], whereby anti-TACA antibodies might reset anoikis of tumor cells.
Glycans are considered as priming agents for T-cells and for B-cells working in concert [22,23,24]. Natural antibodies and induced antibodies can mediate tumor cell killing and tissue destruction by several mechanisms that include complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) [25], antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [26] and through signal transduction pathways, leading to anti-proliferative activity or apoptosis [27]. Antibodies to TACAs have other attributes, such as negating negative signals to immune cells by forming immune complexes with shed TACAs or by blocking attachment of tumor cells to microenvironment constituents. Remodeling the glycan surface of tumor cells either by bio-engineering approaches to facilitate antigen uptake to improve tumor cell immunogenicity [28,29,30] or through inhibitors that affect glycosylation in general may exacerbate the action of antibodies and NK cells reactive with glycan signatures.
Figure 1. Immune surveillance targeting of tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACA) allows both attack on tumor cells and interference with the tumor-generated immunosuppressive factors. Differentially expressed glycans mediate tumor cell dissemination and organ tropism. Carbohydrate antigens are bound by natural antibodies, thymus independent B-cell response generated antibodies and, rarely, by thymus-dependent responses. NK cells and CD1-dependent T-cells are also involved. A wide variety of antibody mediated effector mechanisms are at play—complement- and antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, direct proapoptotic effect, interrupting immunosuppressive signaling, migration, extravasation and organ tropism.
Figure 1. Immune surveillance targeting of tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACA) allows both attack on tumor cells and interference with the tumor-generated immunosuppressive factors. Differentially expressed glycans mediate tumor cell dissemination and organ tropism. Carbohydrate antigens are bound by natural antibodies, thymus independent B-cell response generated antibodies and, rarely, by thymus-dependent responses. NK cells and CD1-dependent T-cells are also involved. A wide variety of antibody mediated effector mechanisms are at play—complement- and antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, direct proapoptotic effect, interrupting immunosuppressive signaling, migration, extravasation and organ tropism.
Vaccines 01 00174 g001
Much of what we know about immune responses to carbohydrates stem from examining immune responses to microbes and developing pathogen-based vaccines. The success of carbohydrate-conjugate vaccines in anti-microbial strategies has fueled expectations for their success as cancer vaccines, because the pathophysiological process of infection and neoplasia are profoundly affected by similar or the same carbohydrate forms. Some worm glycan antigens, for example, share structural features with host-like glycans and TACAs, including Le(X) (Galbeta1-4[Fucalpha1-3]GlcNAc-), LDNF (GalNAcbeta1-4[Fucalpha1-3]GlcNAc-), LDN (GalNAcbeta1-4GlcNAc-) and Tn (GalNAcalpha1-O-Thr/Ser). Anti-glycan antibody responses are a prominent feature of the immune response, for example, in patients infected with schistosomiasis that display the LeX, LDNF and LDN glycans. It is well known that helminths have immunomodulatory effects on their hosts. They characteristically cause a skew toward TH2 immunity and stimulate Treg cells, while simultaneously inhibiting TH1 and TH17 responses. Carbohydrate antigens can directly stimulate NK cells, without previous antigen sensitization or MHC restriction, to initiate lysis and to produce IFN-γ. Costimulatory signals provided by NK cells, together with the effects of NK cell-derived IFN-γ on B-cell differentiation, isotype switching and immunoglobulin secretion, ultimately result in augmentation of the IgG humoral response against T-cell-independent antigens. In this mini-review, we place into context the selected roles of TACAs reactive immune surveillance. In particular, we focus on glycan-mediated phenomena associated with tissue rejection as a model to understand the rationale of controlling of tumor cell growth by some immune modalities that target TACAs.

2. Glycans as Tumor Antigens

The rationale for targeting TACAs was elegantly discussed in terms of tissue distribution and therapeutic importance [31]. The transition in glycosylation patterns of cancer cells reflect a myriad of processes that correlate with poor prognosis of cancer, affecting cell signaling and communication, cell motility and adhesion, angiogenesis and organ tropism. Both simple glycan structures and more complex TACAs play a role in these processes. Glycan structures on the tumor cell surface result from the combined action of glycotransferases and glycosidases. The carbohydrate antigens that have been found to be tumor-associated (Table 1) include the mucin related Tn, sialyl Tn and Thomsen-Friedenreich (TF/T) antigens, the blood group Lewis-related Lewis(Y), Sialyl Lewis(X) (SLeX) and Sialyl Lewis(A) (SLeA), and Lewis(X) (also known as stage-specific embryonic antigen-1, SSEA-1), the glycosphingolipids, Globo H, and stage-specific embryonic antigen-3 (SSEA-3), the sialic acid containing glycosphingolipids, the gangliosides, GD2, GD3, GM2, fucosyl GM1 and Neu5GcGM3 and polysialic acid. SLeX and SLeA, in particular, are carbohydrate molecules that mediate the adhesion between tumor cells and the endothelium. Overexpression of SLeX and SLeA is combined with poor prognosis and malignant relapse [32]. The interaction of the antigen SLeX on tumor cells and E-selectin on endothelial cells was shown to mediate adhesion of tumor cells to endothelial cells [33], possibly facilitating tumor cell invasion in blood microvessels, extravasation and migration into tissue. Additionally, colorectal tumor cells expressing SLeX might prefer the liver to form clinically evident metastases, due to interaction with local E-selectin [34]. SLeX expression and lymphatic microvessel density in primary tumors might predict disease recurrence, suggesting that for some cancer, both lymphatic and hematogenous metastasis is mediated by SLeX interactions [35,36].
Table 1. Common carbohydrate antigens targets from tumor biopsy specimens.
Table 1. Common carbohydrate antigens targets from tumor biopsy specimens.
Carbohydrate antigens Structure
Polysialic acid (PSA)α2,8-/α2,9 NeuAc
Tn GalNAcSer/Thr
sialyl Tn Neu5Acα2-6GalNAcaSer/Thr
T antigenGalβ1-3GalNAcαSer/Thr
SLeX Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-4(Fucα1-3)GlcNAc
Many cell-cell contacts are mediated by cell-surface glycans that are redundant on membrane constituents that effect signaling pathways associated with anchorage independent growth and anoikis. Upregulation of the N-glycan branching enzyme β-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V reduces cell-cell interactions within a tumor, promoting cell detachment and invasion of tumor cells [37]. Also, the expression of O-glycans containing an N-acetylglucosamine branch connected to N-acetylgalactosamine (GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAc), which is designated the core 2 branch, is closely correlated with highly metastatic phenotypes of several tumor types [36,38,39]. Core 2 O-glycans expressed on the cell surface can reduce cell-cell interactions [40]. Mucin-type O-glycans containing Core2 branches have distinctly different functions from those O-glycans that contain Core1 structures. Core2 branched O-glycans can have terminal structures that function as ligands for carbohydrate binding proteins [41]. Sialylated Core2 branched O-glycans without additional modifications exhibit anti-adhesive properties, which might be related to anoikis resistance. These results demonstrate that certain mucin-type O-glycans can either facilitate or attenuate cell adhesion to ECM components and lectin proteins, depending on the core structures and the structures of the non-reducing termini. Several studies revealing the role of core 2 O-glycans in immune responses in general show that core 2 expressions is a biologically significant change [42]. Furthermore, the core 2 O-glycan is a key backbone structure in forming some selectin ligands. β-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (C2GnT), expressed in cancer cells, may play important roles in tumor progression through circulatory system or direct invasion [36], since some of these structures inhibit NK cell activation [43,44,45,46]. Thus, O-linked oligosaccharides, in particular those containing core 2 branches, play vital roles in immune responses and may play dual roles in certain situations [40,47].
Although the effectiveness of some of vaccines targeting TACA has been demonstrated in a number of experimental model systems and suggested in several clinical trials, the mechanism underlying their mode of action is uncertain. The distinction between glycans expressed on glycoproteins or glycolipids can translate to differences in how the immune system generates responses [25]. Previous studies showed that the targets for effective CDC were glycolipids (e.g., GM2, GD2, GD3, fucosyl GM1, Globo H or LeY), whereas those in which no lysis was observed were carbohydrate (e.g., TF, Tn, sTn) or peptide (e.g., MUC1) epitopes carried by mucin molecules [25]. It is observed that some TACAs responsible for CDC are expressed on glycoproteins and glycolipids, such as Globo H and LeY. MUC1, Tn, sTn and TF, in contrast, are not expressed on glycolipids, making the distinction clear. It may be that other antibody-mediated mechanisms, such as ADCC, opsonization of tumor cells by leukocytes, induction of apoptosis and blocking of tumor cell invasion or metastasis also differ, depending on the biochemical and biophysical nature of the targeted antigen. Monoclonal antibodies [26] and human serum antibodies from MUC1 immunized subjects [48] can mediate ADCC of human cancer cells.

3. Innate Recognition of Glycans That Lends to Tumor Suppression

Since tumor tissue rejection is the goal of cancer immunotherapies, broad-spectrum tumor associated antigens, like TACAs, are plausible targets once the problem of their low immunogenicity is solved. The fact that multiple proteins and lipids on the cancer cell are modified with the same carbohydrate structure creates a powerful advantage for TACAs as cancer targets in immunotherapy strategies. Thus, targeting TACAs has the potential to broaden the spectrum of target pathways recognized by the immune response, thereby lowering the risk of developing escape variants, due to the loss of a given protein or carbohydrate antigen. There is an emerging awareness that immune surveillance mechanisms that include antibodies and effector cells are intimately related to TACA reactivity that provides a template for developing strategies for cancer immunotherapy, because of the display of glycans in the context of pattern recognition [49,50,51,52]. Glycans can be clustered representing danger signals to the immune system. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are sentinels of innate immunity that instruct adaptive immunity mechanisms by which long-lived lymphocyte responses are targeted to appropriate antigens [53,54]. Innate immune cells have evolved to sense microbial pathogens through PRRs, coupling pathogen recognition to innate immunity through glycan-dependent mechanisms [55]. The same mechanisms might be operative for glycans expressed on cancer cells. Natural carbohydrate reactive antibodies have been described that mediate tumor cell apoptosis in addition to modulating complement associated cell killing [27,56,57]. Preclinical studies support the hypothesis that antibody-induced responses against TACAs might have their greatest impact in the adjuvant setting, as antibody responses inhibit tumor outgrowth in metastatic models [58]. Such observations suggest that sustained immunity against TACAs should be beneficial to prevent the recurrence of disease, much like the natural ways of immune surveillance. Therefore, maximizing sustained TACA-specific humoral immunity is considered an important goal in developing effective antibody-based immunotherapies against cancer.
Like antibodies, NK cells are partners in immune surveillance. Three predominant superfamilies of NK cell receptors (NKR) have been identified that can either inhibit or activate NK cell function: (i) killer immunoglobulin (Ig)-like receptors (KIR) that bind to classical class I MHC molecules; (ii) C-type lectin receptors that bind to non-classical class I MHC molecules or “class I-like” molecules; and (iii) natural cytotoxicity receptors for which ligands are currently not well defined (except for NKp30 binding to B7-H6 and BAG6) [59]. Interestingly, it is possible that some of the natural cytotoxicity receptors may be binding to glycolipids [60]. NK cells can directly lyse virally infected cells and tumor cells without prior sensitization and provide immunoregulatory cytokines that shape the adaptive immune response. Cytolytic signals, triggered by inhibitory and activation receptors on the cancer cell surface, regulate NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity and the production of chemokines and inflammatory cytokines that mediate the immune response. The expression of some TACAs lend to the evasion of NK cell immunity [43,44], while others activate NK cells [61]. Therefore, aberrant glycosylation, while a target for immune surveillance, can regulate negative signaling of NK cells.

3.1. The Case for TACA-Directed Antibody-Mediated Tissue Rejection

The eradication of xenografts has been suggested as a model to provide important insights about the role played by immunity in mediating tumor tissue rejection [5]. Tissue destruction occurs with resolution of pathogenic processes (cancer, infection) or tissue damage and organ failure (autoimmunity, allograft rejection) [5]. While xenograft rejection is highly mediated through innate immune mechanisms, in tumor immunology, the primary focus for tumor tissue-rejection is focused on effector cell-mediated tumor rejection and, particularly, the definition of cognate T-cell subsets that define signatures for tumor cell rejection. Nevertheless, underlying the various mechanisms associated with the biology of tissue damage or rejection emerges as a common pattern in tumor tissue-specific destruction relevant to TACA targeting [5]. These patterns were elegantly reviewed by Marincola and colleagues [5], which include the postulates that: (1) Tissue-specific destruction does not necessarily only occur after non-self-recognition, but can also occur against self-or quasi-self-antigens. In the context of tumor targets, TACA reactive antibodies are constantly produced, being inherent in the innate and adaptive immunity. (2) The requirements for the induction of a cognate immune response differ from those associated with the development of its effector phase. Natural circulating anti-TACA antibodies are present and are known to be apoptotic to tumor cells. Therefore, antibodies can function as both judge and jury. (3) Although the mechanisms prompting tissue-specific destruction differ among immune pathologies, the effector phase converges into a common activation of adaptive and innate cytotoxic mechanisms. In this context, glycan-reactive T-cells might work in unison with NK cells and antibodies to target tumor cells. Furthermore, (4) adaptive immunity triggers a tissue-specific reaction, but it is not always sufficient or necessary for tissue destruction. Carbohydrate-reactive antibodies bind to both normal tissue and cancer cells. The binding to normal tissues does not necessarily lend to normal tissue destruction, but may facilitate microenvironment interactions that lend to tumor tissue rejection. Indeed, immune-based therapies have the potential to modulate the tumor microenvironment by eliciting immune system cells that will initiate acute inflammation that leads to tissue destruction [62].
Antibodies can mediate tissue rejection that validates targeting TACAs. A model for glycans as tissue rejection antigens includes the response to the xeno-carbohydrate antigen Galα1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc-R (alpha-Gal) epitope. The majority of alpha-Gal antigens are built upon the Gal1, 4GlcNAc (type 2) chain, but other inner-core saccharide chains also exist, especially on glycolipids [63,64,65]. Naturally occurring anti-Gal antibody is produced as the most abundant antibody (1% of immunoglobulins) throughout the life of all individuals [66]. Natural antibodies, such as anti-Gal or anti-blood groups A/B antibodies, mediate hyperacute graft rejection and, thus, represent a major hurdle in xenotransplantation [67] and blood transfusions, respectively. In the initial stage of the rejection, anti-Gal IgG binds to R-Gal epitopes expressed on the surface of xenograft cells, triggering antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity by human blood monocytes and macrophages. The IgM isotype of anti-Gal is believed to be responsible for the complement activation that leads to complement-mediated lysis of the xenograft cells.
While early studies suggested an increased risk of cancer and poor prognosis associated with ABO blood groups, such assertions have not been verified in breast cancer patients [68], but in ovarian cancer, the presence of the B antigen was positively associated with ovarian cancer incidence, whereas blood group A was not associated with risk [68]. One widely-occurring change observed in a large variety of human cancers is deletion of the A or B epitope on tumor cells, associated with accumulation of their precursor H (LeY, LeB), which causes enhanced malignancy [69]. The blood group reactive lectin Griffonia simplicifolia (GS-I), which recognizes alpha-galactosyl moieties is recognized as a surrogate marker to identify tumor expressed antigens reactive with anti-Gal antibodies [70], and GS-I lectin is of utility to interrogate terminal α-GalNAc/Gal expression on human tissues [71].
The antibody-mediated tissue rejection model supports a rationale for targeting TACAs as tumor-induced antibody responses resemble autoimmune responses [72]. Hyperacute rejection is a complement-mediated response in recipients with pre-existing antibodies to the donor (for example, ABO blood type antibodies). Tolerance to autologous ABO blood group antigens seems to depend in part on peripheral control of antibody autoreactivity. However, normal human serum does contain “hidden” natural antibodies reactive with autologous ABO blood group antigens [73]. These naturally occurring antibodies, especially the anti-Gal response, might also have other clinical consequences for immunotherapy [74] in the context of tolerance [75,76], cross-presentation of tumor antigens [77] and increased immunogenicity of cell-based and protein-based vaccines [66]. Consequently, further research is required to develop the translational and clinical applications.

3.2. The Case for Glycan-Directed T-Cell Mediated Tissue Rejection

As T-cell-dependent antigens, proteins have long been seen as the primary target of adaptive immune responses. In contrast, carbohydrates are characterized as T-cell-independent (either Type 1 or Type 2) antigens [78]; yet, early studies demonstrated that T-cells could recognize carbohydrate antigens [79]. Post-translationally modified T-cell epitopes constitute a small fraction of both MHC-I- and MHC-II-bound peptides, and a number of modifications are identified as natural MHC ligands in vivo [80]. Computer-based sequence analysis suggests that only a minimal portion of experimentally verified T-cell epitopes are potentially N- or O-glycosylated (2.26% and 1.22%, respectively) [81] and T cells are demonstrated to react with processed glycopeptides and glycolipids often representing TACA [82]. Some types of carbohydrates seem to be processed and presented to T-cells by MHC-II [83,84] while others associate with the MHC-I groove [85,86,87]. The demonstration that T-cells can recognize non-protein antigens has modified ideas on the breadth of antigens capable of interacting with T-cells [88]. The size of the carbohydrate chains, as well as O- versus N-glycosylation varies depending on tumor histotypes. However, recent studies suggest that O-glycosylation (GalNAc) presentation on a peptide backbone, while inducing CD4+ T-cells can impact negatively on CD8+ T-cell stimulation [85,86,87]. Structures of MHC Class II/peptide complexes suggest analogies with helical carbohydrate structures that could fit the MHC Class II antigen-binding groove [84]. In some cases, carbohydrate directly stimulates T-cells. Specific T-cell clones have been generated from mice immunized with a meningococcal group C (alpha-2→9-sialic acid) polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate [90]. These clones were MHC-independent, but still needed contact with antigen presenting cells for optimal activation [90].
Crystal structure analysis of TCR-glycopeptide interactions validate that TCR can recognize glycans presented on a peptide backbone [91,92]. Existing structures display the key interaction of the core of the peptide ligand, with the TCR CDR3 region shaping a “cavity” often accommodating aromatic amino acid residues. The latter are successfully mimicked in size and conformation by short glycans, like TF or the monomer, Tn. The ability of T-cells to recognize mono- and di-saccharides attached to peptides with Ser or Thr might indicate that T-cells might be degenerate in recognizing glycopeptides [51]. It should not be surprising that sometimes glycopeptides offer no significant benefit as targets for cytotoxic immune response. In some cases, CTL, generated upon immunization with glycopeptide, preferentially kills target cells treated with glycopeptide compared to those treated with the core peptide. In other cases, it does not matter [93], and in some cases, it has been suggested that other glycan receptors are involved in T-cell targeting [94]. This is particularly evident in the work of Madsen et al. [89] that clearly suggest that natural processing of GalNAc on MUC1 might not be a suitable for activating CTLs against MUC1. In general, this may or may not matter, because (a) some activated CTLs are cross-reactive with both the glycosylated and non-glycosylated forms of the same peptide and (b) glycopeptides are of low abundance on tumor target cells [93].
Polyclonal CTL have been observed to kill target cells expressing glycolipid [82]. It has been suggested that glycopeptide-specific-restricted CTL and unrestricted glycan-specific CTL belong to different T-cell populations with regard to TCR expression [95]. Such results demonstrate that hapten-specific unrestricted CTL responses can be generated with MHC Class I-binding carrier peptides. It is possible that CTLs activated with non-glycosylated peptides can cross-react with glycopeptides and carbohydrate themselves. Such peptides have been referred to as carbohydrate mimetic peptides (CMPs) or mimotopes. Sequences and structural properties of CMPs have been discussed previously [96,97,98,99]. CMPs are known to generate T-cells cross-reactive with carbohydrates [100] and to tumor cells [76,100,101,102,103]. The similarity of extended peptide structure and carbohydrates that can fit within Class I or Class II groves has also been noted [97]. In addition, select amino acid residues can spatially overlap glycans attached to peptides in the Class I grove [99]. T-lymphocytes from CMP-immunized animals were shown to be activated in vitro by SLeX, triggering IFN-gamma production in a MHC-dependent manner. Stimulation by peptide or carbohydrate resulted in loss of L-selectin on CD4+ T-cells, confirming a Th1 phenotype. An enhancement in CTL activity in vitro against SLeX-expressing Meth A cells using effector cells from Meth A-primed/peptide-boosted animals was observed. CTL activity was inhibited by both anti-MHC class I and anti-L-selectin antibodies. These results further support a role for L-selectin in tumor rejection, along with the engagement by the TCR for most likely processed tumor-associated glycopeptides, focusing on peptide mimetics as a means to induce carbohydrate reactive cellular responses. Immunization of mice with this CMP reduced tumor cell growth in a transplanted mammary tumor model mediated, to a large extent, by CD8+ T-cells [58], but without any damage to normal tissue after vaccination with the CMP [104]. These observations are very important in understanding the complexity of the antitumor response, especially in terms of abnormal glycan expression patterns and developing strategies in vaccine design.

3.3. The Case for NK Cell-Mediated Rejection

Cell-mediated cytotoxicity is a primary effector function of NK cells. It has been known for a long time that NK cells play a major role in tumor immune surveillance by serving as the first line of antitumor immune defense [105,106]. The multifaceted steps early in NK immune surveillance include an orchestrated activation and recruitment to the tissue sites where they, perform effector functions, which may be associated with tumor reactive antibodies. Receptor diversity is crucial in allowing NK cells to respond effectively, mediating their effects through direct cytolysis, release of cytokines and regulation of subsequent adaptive immune responses [107,108,109,110,111]. NK cell lysis is regulated by a balance of intracellular signals transmitted via stimulatory and inhibitory cell surface receptors after specific binding to their respective target cell ligands [112,113,114]. Activation of endogenous NK cells bears limited clinical benefit, as most cancer patients are treated with chemotherapy, and their immune system is compromised. Consequently focus has been directed in recent years to first understand NK suppression mechanisms and how better to exploit NK cell functionality.
Antibodies promote NK cell activation through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The best example of combining an anti-GD2 antibody with NK cells is in neuroblastoma (NB) [115]. Treatment of patients with high-risk NB with monoclonal antibodies targeting the disialoganglioside surface antigen GD2 has resulted in lower recurrence rates and improved overall survival [116,117,118,119]. In addition to complement-dependent cytotoxicity, the anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody 3F8 achieves NB killing through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity mediated by myeloid and NK cells [117]. To combine specific antibody-mediated recognition of NB cells with the potent cytotoxic activity of NK cells, clonal derivatives of the clinically applicable human NK cell line NK-92 that stably express a GD2-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) comprising an anti-GD2 ch14.18 single chain Fv antibody fusion protein with CD3-ζ chain as a signaling moiety has been described [120]. CAR development in general is a hot topic area in immunotherapeutics, but mostly in developing T-cells for adoptive therapy [121]. The therapeutic efficacy of endogenous NK cells depends on the effectiveness of NK-activating agents to mobilize sufficient numbers of these cells to tumor sites [122]. The clinical utilization of NK cells is considered at the forefront of cancer therapy. It should be clear that adoptive transfer of NK cells should lead to high levels of circulating NK cells, but that does not necessarily translate into mediating tumor regression [123]. This may result from expression of glycans on the tumor cells in addition to glycans shed from the tumor cell surface.
A variety of studies have linked the nature of signaling with the glycan ligand NK receptor paring. In this context, interest has focused on the N-glycan biosynthesis of glycoproteins and, in particular, branching enzymes, such as N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III), GnT-IV, GnT-V and a1-6 fucosyl- transferase (a1-6FucT) [124,125], that can regulate the further processing of the N-glycan structures, which play a pivotal role in tumor development, metastasis and invasion. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans play a role in NK cell initial recognition and activation [126,127]. The interaction of SLeX antigen with lectin-like receptors on NK cells also triggers cytotoxicity [128,129]. Clustered glycoconjugates sharing the common structure motif trisaccharide Le(x) [130] can enhance cytotoxicity specifically by CD16+ NK cells. GlcNAc-terminated glycoclusters are found to be potent inhibitors of receptors on natural killer cells [131]. N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc) transferases, MGAT3 and MGAT5, have major involvement in linking terminating residues on glycans. MGAT5 is responsible for adding β1-6 GlcNAc residues and forming branched structures, which are especially abundant in cancer tissues with high metastatic potential. MGAT3 catalyzes the addition of β1-4 GlcNAc residues and forms a bisecting structure that disables further addition of GlcNAc by other glycosyltransferases, like MGAT5. Expression of terminal GlcNAc is perceived to inhibit NK function supported by experiments in which siRNA targeting these glycosyltransferases in tumor cells are observed to increase NK cell activity towards tumors [132].
Some transformed cells evade immune surveillance and become resistant to NK cell cytotoxicity, mainly because some shed TACA inhibits NK cell activation [45], leading to established primary tumors [133,134,135,136]. In renal cell carcinoma, the presence of higher gangliosides correlates with systematic metastasis. Disialosyl globopentaosylceramide (DSGb5) was identified previously as one of the major gangliosides from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Siglec-7 (sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin-7), expressed on NK cells as an inhibitory receptor, has a striking preference for internally branched α2,6-linked disialic gangliosides, such as DSGb5 [135]. These results suggest that DSGb5 expressed on RCC cells can downregulate NK cell cytotoxicity in a DSGb5-Siglec-7-dependent manner and that RCC cells with DSGb5 create a favorable circumstance for their own survival and metastases [135]. Consequently, despite the enthusiasm of using NK cells in adoptive transfer protocols, in most cases, NK functionality needs to be reset by remodeling the tumor glycan surface. The remodeling can lead to activation of endogenous NK cells with anti-tumoral function. Studies exploring such possibilities are warranted and under research.

3.4. Remodeling Glycan Signatures

Strategies for cell surface “glycoform remodeling” promise to facilitate the investigation of carbohydrate mediated cell-cell interactions [137] and as cancer vaccines [138]. Expression of the human α1,2-fucosyltransferase, for example, in transgenic pigs modifies the cell surface carbohydrate phenotype and confers resistance to human serum-mediated cytolysis [139]. The T-cell-independent process of delayed xenograft rejection is suggested as a model for glycan remodeling, which augments NK cell activity [140]. While natural antibodies against alpha-Gal epitope cause hyperacute rejection of pig organs in primates, evidence for the role of alpha-Gal in the NK cell-mediated xeno-response has been contradictory [141]. Therefore, while logic would dictate that glycan remodeling facilitates an improved immune response [138], the nature of these responses might be limited to antibodies and T-cells.
Nevertheless it was argued early on that inhibition of N-linked oligosaccharide processing in malignant cells is associated with increased susceptibility to natural immunity [142]. Interference with N-glycosylation has been shown both to reduce the membrane expression of MHC class I and to increase the in vitro sensitivity of tumor cells to NK cell killing. It was long recognized that compounds that inhibit glycosylation pathways could affect the growth of tumor cells in tumor bearing animals. Castanospermine, swainsonine and tunicamycin block different steps in the pathways of glycoprotein processing that affect tumor cell dissemination and tumor colonization. This suggested blocking at one of at least two steps could have beneficial effects on tumor cell growth. The antimetastatic effect of tunicamycin may be related to interference in tumor cell-extracellular matrix interactions, whereas treatment with castanospermine or swainsonine appears to block at a stage distal to initial tumor cell arrest [143]. Swainsonine, in particular, is interesting, as it inhibits the formation of N-linked complex oligosaccharides with this inhibition correlative with enhancement with NK cell function. Consequently, inhibitors of N-, as well as O-linked glycosylation need to be expanded, because they should be useful for the treatment of cancer by effectively resetting NK functional activity by disruption of negative signals; given that inhibitors can be specifically targeted to tumor tissue [144]. More recently, it was shown that glycosylation regulates NK cell-mediated effector function through the PI3K pathway [132].
Antibodies might also regulate glycan expression patterns in an undefined way that enhances NK activity. The orchestration of glycan remodeling and galectin-1 upregulation by the tumor suppressor p16INK4a in pancreatic carcinoma cells to reconstitute susceptibility to anoikis underscores the potential and tight control of this lectin [145]. Anti-glycan antibodies can function like lectins, mediating cell death signals [58] and cell growth signals [146]. Other galectins can promote NK cell-mediated anti-tumor activity by expanding unique phenotypes [147]. Co-culture of naive NK cells with macrophages from Gal-9-treated mice resulted in enhanced NK activity, although Gal-9 itself did not enhance the NK activity [147]. Antibodies can do the same. Clinical studies have indicated a role for anti-ganglioside IgM antibodies (including anti-GD2) in passive and active immunity against some cancers [148,149,150]. Their mechanism(s) of action is not clear, but a study in which mice transgenic for anti-GD2 IgM antibody were protected from EL4 metastasis and death indicated a role for IgM, complement and NK cells [151]. In these studies depletion of NK cells with anti-asialo GM1 rabbit serum reduced or abrogated the observed anti-tumor effects, suggesting that NK cells play a major role in tumor eradication or suppression [151]. It is possible that the GD2 model actually opens a window on a more general innate circuitry, which has just been further elucidated. Macrophages activated by Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands appear to stimulate B cells, including through CD40-CD40L interactions, to a state of activation (CD69+ CD25hi, CD317+) in which they produce IFN alpha and stimulate NK cells nonspecifically [152].

4. Augmenting Responses to TACA

The clinical importance of targeting TACAs is highlighted by the success of carbohydrate-based vaccines against infectious diseases, by the role of TACAs in autoimmune phenomena and by the observed anti-TACA antibodies as clinical correlates of positive outcome seen in patients with cancer. Carbohydrate-based vaccines against Haemophilus influenzae Type b, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi (S. Typhi) are already licensed, and many similar products are in various stages of development. Therefore, factors contributing to the successes and failures of these bacterial vaccines serve as guides to developing carbohydrate-targeting cancer vaccines. The practical benefits of inducing TACA-reactive antibodies in patients with cancer are further demonstrated by observations that patient survival significantly correlates with ganglioside-reactive IgM levels [149,153]. Low affinity natural IgM antibodies have been found indispensable for anti-viral responses [154,155]. An analogous role for natural antibodies as an innate anti-cancer surveillance mechanism has been suggested, but has been underappreciated, so far [156,157]. The fact that survival rates of cancer patients are correlated with low (intrinsic) affinity and low-titer TACA-reactive antibodies argues that more robust antibody responses may not be necessary.
The successful development of anti-microbial vaccines has proven that antibodies—particularly those targeting carbohydrate antigens—are ideally suited for eradicating pathogens from the blood stream and from early tissue invasion. Similarly, vaccines targeting TACAs may also prove beneficial in treating micrometastases. This may be the case since anti-TACA antibodies correlate with beneficial effects on the course of malignant disease and long-term patient survival [149]. However, N-acetylglucosamine branch in O-glycans (core 2 O-glycans) expressing cancer cells acquire highly metastatic phenotypes by surviving longer in host blood circulation [43,44,45]. The induction of TACA reactive antibodies and NK cells to leukemic cells might prove specially beneficial, since simple glycan profiles and commonly contained sialyl-T (NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-3GalNAc) and disialyl-T (NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-3(NeuAcalpha2-6)GalNAc) antigens as major O-glycans are observed on these cells [158] and receptors on NK cells bind to alpha2,3-NeuAc-containing glycoproteins [159]. Therefore, maximizing sustained antibody immunity against TACAs that express simple Core 1 and Core 2 (C2GNT-1) structures is an important goal in developing effective cancer vaccines to combat recurrent disease.

4.1. Taking Advantage of Natural Antibodies

The ability of the immune system to identify and destroy nascent cancer cells and, thereby, function as a primary defense against cancer, is a long-standing debate. This raises expectations of therapeutic development of antibodies derived from the promise of multifaceted biological potency compared to stoichiometrically binding antibodies that just interfere with receptor binding. It is postulated that anti-carbohydrate antibodies are part of immune surveillance, just as they are a first line of defense against infectious agents. Natural antibodies may not only have a direct cytotoxic effect on intact tumor cells, but also bystander effects. In addition, they are known to contain low affinity self-reactive fraction representing a “grey area” of the tolerance to self. It has been proposed that this “grey” self-reactivity actually detects quantitative rather than qualitative changes of the antigenic landscape—a function especially suited to detecting unnaturally increased expression of TACA [160].
Antibodies that bind to a broad spectrum of TACA can reduce tumor cell dissemination by multiple mechanisms, including blocking the adhesion of metastatic cells to adhesion molecules and generally functioning as regulatory molecules to thwart signaling processes that underlie migration and autocrine and paracrine activities that grant immune privilege to cancer. FAK is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase that plays an important role in signal transduction pathways that are initiated at sites of integrin-mediated cell adhesions and by growth factor receptors. FAK is a key regulator of survival, proliferation, migration and invasion: processes that are all involved in the development and progression of cancer. FAK is also linked to oncogenes at both a biochemical and functional level. Moreover, overexpression and/or increased activity of FAK is common in a wide variety of human cancers, implicating a role for FAK in carcinogenesis. Given the important role of FAK in a large number of processes involved in tumorigenesis, metastasis and survival signaling, FAK should be regarded as a potential pathway target in the development of antibodies targeting TACAs that are associated with anoikis [21] and blocking adhesion.
Determining populations of glycan reactive antibodies in the repertoire of natural autoantibodies could lead to developing immunotherapies targeting cancer without affecting normal tissues or resulting in adverse side-effects. Thus, the application of natural antibodies, like IVIg, has the potential to be a supportive therapy for the treatment of cancer metastases and provide an opportunity to probe yet undefined roles of natural antibodies relating broad-spectrum reactivity with anti-cancer functional properties. Most anti-glycan antibodies recognize epitopes of two or three sugars. Consequently, antibodies can cross-react with similar terminal structures. This property of recognizing epitopes “shared” by different molecules is characteristic of anti-glycan antibodies and can be considered an example of “antigen mimicry”. In this context, it would seem that anti-Gal antibodies should be reactive with the histo-blood group antigens, LeB and LeY. Blood group B individuals show reactivity to Tn antigen [161], and some anti-Gal antibodies are cross-reactive with the blood group B antigen [162]. Anti-Gal alpha(1,3)Gal antibodies are observed to react with mucin 1 (MUC1) found on the surface of human breast cancer cells [163]. Thus, natural occurring anti-Gal alpha (1,3)Gal antibodies found in all human serum can react with self (MUC1) peptides expressed in large amounts on the surface of tumor cells, but not on normal cells. These findings are of interest and serve to explain reported findings that human cells can, at times, express Gal alpha(1,3)Gal; such expression is suggested as an artifact in that anti-Gal alpha(1,3)Gal antibodies react with mucin peptides [163].
The cross-reactivity of anti-Gal antibodies has been exploited in cell therapy, where autologous cells processed to express alpha-Gal epitopes result in anti-Gal-mediated, in vivo targeting of autologous tumor vaccine to antigen presenting cells (APC) [77,164]. Transfection of cells with the enzyme 1,3galactosyltransferase (1,3GT) with concomitant expression of the Gal epitope followed by immune complex formation by anti-Gal antibodies should increase transport to lymph nodes and processing of anti-Gal complexed vaccines internalized by APC. Anticipated results include an effective activation of vaccine-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells and high cellular and humoral immune response [77]. While manipulating the pre-existing anti-Gal response may facilitate an efficacious vaccine response through antigen spreading to antitumor T-cell response, truly tumor-specific antigens are needed to contribute decisively to tumor regression [165].
However, some antibodies display exquisite specificity, like those directed toward the TF antigen [166]. Postpartum, carbohydrate structures on the cell walls of the gastrointestinal flora evoke natural antibodies of presumed TF specificity. These antibodies may provide an early barrier against TF-carrying tumor cells. The widely used regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is demonstrated to stimulate the immune response to TACA in some patients, as reviewed by Andre et al. [167]. Small retrospective studies have suggested that post-chemotherapy lymphocyte infiltrates could be associated with better outcome in patients who did not reach pathologic complete response [167]. The high levels of anti-TF antibody before surgery is another example in which antibody targeting is associated with a better survival of stage II breast cancer patients [168]. This may indicate that the selection of immunopotentiating regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be beneficial for the host in conjunction with the functional activity of natural anti-cancer antibodies.
On the other hand, the detectable spontaneous immune responses to T and Tn antigens are not necessarily efficient, since the expression of these antigens correlates with worse prognosis, mostly because of increased metastasis. The reason may be an escape of some cancer cells from the control by immune responses to TACA, like T, Tn and sialyl-Tn. It is also possible that the correlation with higher grade and metastasis is due to the observation that some tumors are resistant to immunoediting. It would be interesting to differentiate between primarily TACA-negative tumors and secondarily negative tumors that arise due to immunoediting. It is likely that specific suppressive influence of the tumor on the production of TF antibodies is associated with the stage and grade of the tumor. Postoperatively, these antibodies rebound, as do lymphocyte counts [169]. The observation of positive correlation between the level of TF antibodies and the count of lymphocytes in TF-responders appears to reflect the adaptive immune response and provides a further explanation for the involvement of anti-TF IgG in cancer-associated immunosuppression. However, the possible protective mechanism of TF antibodies in cancer has yet remained unclear, as is the role antibodies play in the natural anti-cancer defense system. The signs of tumor-immune system interaction, together with the ambivalence of the results, draw attention to the hypothesis that immune surveillance may be just an epiphenomenon of the “knowledge of self” or, at least, still very early in the process of evolutionary optimization. The tools are there, but maybe they are yet to be tuned.

4.2. Bridging Humoral and Cellular Responses

Because of their characteristic immunogenicity and/or immunotolerance, most TACAs fail to induce T-cell-mediated immunity that is critical for cancer therapy. Approaches to overcome this limitation or improve their immunogenicity include coupling covalently TACA to proper carrier molecules to form clustered or multi-epitopic conjugate vaccines, coupling TACAs to a T-cell peptide epitope and/or an immunostimulant epitope to form fully synthetic multi-component glycoconjugate vaccines [138]. Polyvalent vaccines containing a variety of tumor-associated antigens are being tested under the hypothesis that a greater number of antigens in a vaccine will increase the probability of containing the correct antigen(s) to stimulate an effective anti-tumor response. The case for a polyvalent cancer vaccine to induce antibodies to TACAs has been made [170], although, in general, there may be more heterogeneity in antibody responses to polyvalent vaccines than that anticipated with monovalent vaccines [171]. More recent studies on carbohydrate-based vaccines are essentially modifications to the basic premise of conjugate formulations [172,173,174,175].
The recognition that T-cell receptors can interact with glycopeptides has facilitated concepts for new antigens being developed to activate anti-tumor responses. The feasibility of T-cell antigens design based on carbohydrate structures is strongly supported by crystallography of several HLA/peptide complexes. These include designer glycopeptides to facilitate CTL activation [176], glycan modification of antigens to target to APC to enhance both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses [177,178,179]. One of the more important glycan decorated tumor antigens is human mucin 1 protein (MUC1). Attempts to develop MUC1-targeting cancer vaccines based on carrier-conjugated unglycosylated MUC1 tandem repeat peptides or carrier-conjugated glycosylated epitopes have been largely unsuccessful. Problems here partly relate to the conformational differences between non-glycosylated vaccine sequences and tumor-expressed, aberrantly glycosylated MUC1. Moreover, densely glycosylated MUC1 glycopeptide might be inefficiently processed by antigen-presenting cells, which ultimately means T-helper cells and CTLS aren’t highly activated.
More promising results in tumor models have been reported using a two-component vaccine approach based on an MHC I glycopeptide and a T-helper epitope [180]. A multicomponent vaccine comprising a glycosylated MUC1-derived glycopeptide covalently linked to a T-helper epitope and TLR immunoadjuvant elicited potent humoral and cellular immune responses, effectively reversing tolerance and demonstrated potent anticancer effects. The vaccine candidate comprises the thiobenzyl ester of Pam3CysSK4 as a TLR2 ligand adjuvant, together with the composite T-helper epitope and aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 peptide, CKLFAVWKITYKDTGTSAPDT(αGalNAc)RPAP, formulated into phospholipid-based small unilamellar vesicles. To test its effects in vivo, the tripart vaccine was administered to experimental mice and the animals challenged with MUC1-expressing mammary tumor cells after 35 days. A week after the cancer challenge, the mice were given another vaccine boost. Control mice were administered with vaccine constructs comprising either the unglycosylated vaccine or subunits of the overall vaccine structure, i.e., just the glycopeptide or the adjuvant. Immunization with the multicomponent vaccine led to significant reductions in tumor burden and weight when compared with treatment using either empty liposomes or immunization with a control vaccine that didn’t contain the MUC1 glycopeptide epitope or an unglycosylated multicomponent candidate. Immunization with the primary tripartite candidate also elicited robust IgG antibody responses against the MUC1 glycopeptide, including a mixed Th1/Th2 response.
However, there are aspects of MUC1 that are largely ignored in the literature that might impact on its utility as an immunogen. Recently it was found that several of the tumor-related glycoforms of carcinoembryonic antigen, and MUC1 might affect CLR signaling and DC differentiation. These are specific ligands for the pattern recognition receptors DC-SIGN [181] and macrophage galactose-type C-type lectin (MGL) [182], expressed on DCs. MGL1/2-positive cells are interesting, as they represent a distinct sub-population of macrophages, having unique functions in the generation and maintenance of granulation tissue induced by antigenic stimuli [183]. MGL1 is postulated to be actively involved in inflammatory processes [184]. Consequently, Tn glycans on MUC1 that bind MGL might instruct DC to drive Th2-mediated responses, which, unlike those of Th1 effector cells, are thought not to contribute to tumor cell eradication. This has several ramifications. Cancer patients with MUC1 expression profiles may exhibit a Th2-skewed cytokine profile within blood and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. This Th1/Th2 imbalance would coincide with disease progression and immunotherapy response. Various lines of evidence suggest that in vivo skewing of T-cell responses toward a Th2 type is an important mechanism of immune evasion in cancer patients [185,186,187]. Terminal glycan structures shared by both host and parasitic helminths include LeX, LDN and LDNF and the truncated O-glycans known as the T (Galβ1-3GalNAcα1-O-Thr/Ser) and Tn antigens, all glycan antigens that may interact with host lectins that skew the immune response to Th2 profiles [188]. This skewing may limit the efficacy of immunotherapeutic approaches [189]. Immunization with formulations that reflect a Th2 bias of the native antigen might only exacerbate the Th2 response. Ensuring induction of a strong type 1 response may be critical to the development of effective cancer vaccines.
MUC1-derived non-glycosylated peptides are also demonstrated to mimic carbohydrate antigens that include the Gal epitope [76]. Non-glycosylated peptides that mimic TACAs are noted to induce both humoral and cellular responses to tumors. CMPs can induce cellular responses, including CMP- and TACA-reactive Th1 CD4+ and tumor-specific CD8+ cells [100,101], and CMPs can prime for memory responses to TACAs [190]. We have demonstrated that a single CMP can bind to antibodies with differing TACA specificities that, upon immunization, can induce divergent antibody responses that recognize a range of TACAs [191]. Thus, this important and novel feature of CMPs effectively broadens the repertoire of reactive antibodies without inducing autoimmunity in animal models. The capacity to induce a carbohydrate-cross-reactive humoral, a Th and a CTL response with one single CMP is clearly a unique property of this approach. The observations that CMPs can induce both antibody and cellular responses in the absence of autoimmunity emphasize the feasibility of CMP-based vaccination strategies and the potential benefits of maximizing their effectiveness. Furthermore, CMPs can be encoded into DNA and viral vectors to enhance long-term immunity, which precludes the need for repeated TACA-based vaccination to maintain immune surveillance. This approach has led to a phase I study of a carbohydrate mimetic peptide (manuscript in preparation) in stage IV breast cancer subjects. This CMP shares homology with a region of MUC1, but involved reverse engineering using antibody and lectin templates as the basis for CMP development [104].
The mimicking of MUC1 non-glycosylated peptides with the Gal epitope might also have unintended consequences. For example, mimicry might lend to confusion in deciphering the difference in natural antibody levels to MUC1 and clinical outcomes to MUC1-based vaccines if anti-Gal antibodies cross-reactive with MUC1 are not considered [192]. In addition, this mimicry might also skew Th2 type responses to MUC1 vaccines, which is contradictory to the present paradigm that stresses Th1 responses to MUC1 and other tumor associated antigens. In fact, it is easy to see that as MUC1 expressing cancer cells emerge, the Th2 response becomes set. Vaccines that are MUC1-based might only stimulate B-cells and T-cells that are already primed as the Th2 type, exacerbating what might be akin to “original antigen sin” or an amnestic response to MUC1 of Th2 type [193]. In addition, while transgenic mice expressing human MUC1 are perceived to be of importance to understand the immune response to MUC1 in humans, it is often overlooked that these transgenics also express murine MUC1 in which T cells generated to human MUC1 peptides cross-react with naturally expressed murine MUC1 peptides. This cross-reactivity is seldom discussed and has the potential to confound results.

5. Conclusions

Glycans or TACAs are important targets for cancer immunotherapy, as suggested by immune surveillance mechanisms. TACAs display important biological effects in tumor biology and tumor immunology. Most importantly, the recognition properties of glycans by immune effector cells have suggested translational strategies in immune therapy. The diversity of regulatory mechanisms involving glycans expands the range of possible effects of TACA targeting immunotherapeutic approaches. Anti-TACA antibodies, thus, may be involved in more than direct tumor cytotoxicity. Although the exact mechanism may represent a cascade of steps that are still to be established, immunization targeting TACAs has already been shown to yield antitumor effects mediated by NK cells or through neutralization of tumor immunosuppressive factors in the form of soluble gangliosides. Future work should clarify the points of involvement of antibody/carbohydrate interactions in modulating tumor growth and facilitating innate surveillance mechanisms.
The abrogation of negative regulatory signals imposed by glycans and the maintenance of the activated phenotype of NK cells can significantly enhance NK cell activity against solid tumors. Manipulating the balance between inhibitory and activating NK receptor signals, the sensitivity of target cells to NK cell-mediated apoptosis and NK cell cross-talk with other immune effector cells might hold therapeutic promise [194,195]. Efforts to modulate NK cell trafficking into inflamed tissues and/or lymph nodes and to counteract NK cell suppressors, might prove fruitful in the clinic. However, a greater understanding of how to downregulate negative signaling, the benefits of combination therapy, characterization of the functional distinctions between NK cell subsets and the design of new tools to monitor NK cell activity are needed to strengthen our ability to harness the power of NK cells for therapeutic aims.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Swann, J.B.; Smyth, M.J. Immune surveillance of tumors. J. Clin. Invest. 2007, 117, 1137–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Burnet, F.M. The concept of immunological surveillance. Prog. Exp. Tumor Res. 1970, 13, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  3. Soloski, M.J. Recognition of tumor cells by the innate immune system. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2001, 13, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, E.; Monaco, A.; Monsurro, V.; Sabatino, M.; Pos, Z.; Uccellini, L.; Wang, J.; Worschech, A.; Stroncek, D.F.; Marincola, F.M. Antitumor vaccines, immunotherapy and the immunological constant of rejection. IDrugs 2009, 12, 297–301. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, E.; Worschech, A.; Marincola, F.M. The immunologic constant of rejection. Trends Immunol. 2008, 29, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Houghton, A.N.; Guevara-Patiño, J.A. Immune recognition of self in immunity against cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 2004, 114, 468–471. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schreiber, T.H.; Raez, L.; Rosenblatt, J.D.; Podack, E.R. Tumor immunogenicity and responsiveness to cancer vaccine therapy: The state of the art. Semin. Immunol. 2010, 22, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hakomori, S. Tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens defining tumor malignancy: Basis for development of anti-cancer vaccines. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2001, 491, 369–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, Y.; Sette, A.; Sidney, J.; Gendler, S.J.; Franco, A. Tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens: A possible avenue for cancer prevention. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2005, 83, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ono, M.; Hakomori, S. Glycosylation defining cancer cell motility and invasiveness. Glycoconj. J. 2004, 20, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sakamoto, S.; Kyprianou, N. Targeting anoikis resistance in prostate cancer metastasis. Mol. Aspects Med. 2010, 31, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhong, X.; Rescorla, F.J. Cell surface adhesion molecules and adhesion-initiated signaling: Understanding of anoikis resistance mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Signal. 2012, 24, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kornberg, L.J. Focal adhesion kinase and its potential involvement in tumor invasion and metastasis. Head Neck 1998, 20, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hauck, C.R.; Hsia, D.A.; Schlaepfer, D.D. The focal adhesion kinase—A regulator of cell migration and invasion. IUBMB Life 2002, 53, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sawai, H.; Okada, Y.; Funahashi, H.; Matsuo, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Takeyama, H.; Manabe, T. Activation of focal adhesion kinase enhances the adhesion and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells via extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 signaling pathway activation. Mol. Cancer 2005, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Danker, K.; Reutter, W.; Semini, G. Glycosidated phospholipids: Uncoupling of signalling pathways at the plasma membrane. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 160, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, D.; Wei, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Yan, Q. Difucosylated oligosaccharide Lewis Y is contained within integrin alphavbeta3 on RL95–2 cells and required for endometrial receptivity. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 1446–1451. [Google Scholar]
  18. Valentino, L.A.; Ladisch, S. Tumor gangliosides enhance alpha2 beta1 integrin-dependent platelet activation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1316, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.X.; Chen, X.W.; Li, C.G.; Yue, L.J.; Mai, H.R.; Wen, F.Q. Effect of tumor gangliosides on tyrosine phosphorylation of p125FAK in platelet adhesion to collagen. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 29, 343–348. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ohkawa, Y.; Miyazaki, S.; Hamamura, K.; Kambe, M.; Miyata, M.; Tajima, O.; Ohmi, Y.; Yamauchi, Y.; Furukawa, K. Ganglioside GD3 enhances adhesion signals and augments malignant properties of melanoma cells by recruiting integrins to glycolipid-enriched microdomains. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 27213–27223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aixinjueluo, W.; Furukawa, K.; Zhang, Q.; Hamamura, K.; Tokuda, N.; Yoshida, S.; Ueda, R. Mechanisms for the apoptosis of small cell lung cancer cells induced by anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies: Roles of anoikis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 29828–29836. [Google Scholar]
  22. Christiansen, D.; Vaughan, H.A.; Milland, J.; Dodge, N.; Mouhtouris, E.; Smyth, M.J.; Godfrey, D.I.; Sandrin, M.S. Antibody responses to glycolipid-borne carbohydrates require CD4+ T cells but not CD1 or NKT cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2011, 89, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zajonc, D.M.; Kronenberg, M. Carbohydrate specificity of the recognition of diverse glycolipids by natural killer T cells. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 230, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Freire, T.; Zhang, X.; Deriaud, E.; Ganneau, C.; Vichier-Guerre, S.; Azria, E.; Launay, O.; Lo-Man, R.; Bay, S.; Leclerc, C. Glycosidic Tn-based vaccines targeting dermal dendritic cells favor germinal center B-cell development and potent antibody response in the absence of adjuvant. Blood 2010, 116, 3526–3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ragupathi, G.; Liu, N.X.; Musselli, C.; Powell, S.; Lloyd, K.; Livingston, P.O. Antibodies against tumor cell glycolipids and proteins, but not mucins, mediate complement-dependent cytotoxicity. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 5706–5712. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lavrsen, K.; Madsen, C.B.; Rasch, M.G.; Woetmann, A.; Odum, N.; Mandel, U.; Clausen, H.; Pedersen, A.E.; Wandall, H.H. Aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 is expressed on the surface of breast cancer cells and a target for antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Glycoconj. J. 2013, 30, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vollmers, H.P.; Brandlein, S. Natural antibodies and cancer. N. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Champion, E.; Andre, I.; Moulis, C.; Boutet, J.; Descroix, K.; Morel, S.; Monsan, P.; Mulard, L.A.; Remaud-Simeon, M. Design of alpha-transglucosidases of controlled specificity for programmed chemoenzymatic synthesis of antigenic oligosaccharides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7379–7389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pon, R.A.; Biggs, N.J.; Jennings, H.J. Polysialic acid bioengineering of neuronal cells by N-acyl sialic acid precursor treatment. Glycobiology 2007, 17, 249–260. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bertozzi, C.R.; Kiessling, L.L. Chemical glycobiology. Science 2001, 291, 2357–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Livingston, P.O.; Zhang, S.; Lloyd, K.O. Carbohydrate vaccines that induce antibodies against cancer. 1. Rationale. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 1997, 45, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nakagoe, T.; Fukushima, K.; Tanaka, K.; Sawai, T.; Tsuji, T.; Jibiki, M.; Nanashima, A.; Yamaguchi, H.; Yasutake, T.; Ayabe, H.; Arisawa, K. Evaluation of sialyl Lewis(a), sialyl Lewis(x), and sialyl Tn antigens expression levels as predictors of recurrence after curative surgery in node-negative colorectal cancer patients. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002, 21, 107–113. [Google Scholar]
  33. Walz, G.; Aruffo, A.; Kolanus, W.; Bevilacqua, M.; Seed, B. Recognition by ELAM-1 of the sialyl-Lex determinant on myeloid and tumor cells. Science 1990, 250, 1132–1135. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gout, S.; Tremblay, P.L.; Huot, J. Selectins and selectin ligands in extravasation of cancer cells and organ selectivity of metastasis. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2008, 25, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Doekhie, F.S.; Morreau, H.; de Bock, G.H.; Speetjens, F.M.; Dekker-Ensink, N.G.; Putter, H.; van de Velde, C.J.; Tollenaar, R.A.; Kuppen, P.J. Sialyl Lewis X expression and lymphatic microvessel density in primary tumors of node-negative colorectal cancer patients predict disease recurrence. Cancer Microenviron. 2008, 1, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shimodaira, K.; Nakayama, J.; Nakamura, N.; Hasebe, O.; Katsuyama, T.; Fukuda, M. Carcinoma-associated expression of core 2 beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase gene in human colorectal cancer: Role of O-glycans in tumor progression. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 5201–5206. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dennis, J.W.; Pawling, J.; Cheung, P.; Partridge, E.; Demetriou, M. UDP-N-acetylglucosamine:alpha-6-D-mannoside beta1,6 N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (Mgat5) deficient mice. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1573, 414–422. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yousefi, S.; Higgins, E.; Daoling, Z.; Pollex-Kruger, A.; Hindsgaul, O.; Dennis, J.W. Increased UDP-GlcNAc:Gal beta 1-3GaLNAc-R (GlcNAc to GaLNAc) beta-1, 6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity in metastatic murine tumor cell lines. Control of polylactosamine synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 1772–1782. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hagisawa, S.; Ohyama, C.; Takahashi, T.; Endoh, M.; Moriya, T.; Nakayama, J.; Arai, Y.; Fukuda, M. Expression of core 2 beta1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase facilitates prostate cancer progression. Glycobiology 2005, 15, 1016–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tsuboi, S.; Fukuda, M. Roles of O-linked oligosaccharides in immune responses. Bioessays 2001, 23, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fukuda, M. Roles of mucin-type O-glycans in cell adhesion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1573, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pang, P.C.; Tissot, B.; Drobnis, E.Z.; Morris, H.R.; Dell, A.; Clark, G.F. Analysis of the human seminal plasma glycome reveals the presence of immunomodulatory carbohydrate functional groups. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 4906–4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Okamoto, T.; Yoneyama, M.S.; Hatakeyama, S.; Mori, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Koie, T.; Saitoh, H.; Yamaya, K.; Funyu, T.; Fukuda, M.; et al. Core2 O-glycan-expressing prostate cancer cells are resistant to NK cell immunity. Mol. Med. Rep. 2013, 7, 359–364. [Google Scholar]
  44. Suzuki, Y.; Sutoh, M.; Hatakeyama, S.; Mori, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Koie, T.; Saitoh, H.; Yamaya, K.; Funyu, T.; Habuchi, T.; et al. MUC1 carrying core 2 O-glycans functions as a molecular shield against NK cell attack, promoting bladder tumor metastasis. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 40, 1831–1838. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsuboi, S.; Sutoh, M.; Hatakeyama, S.; Hiraoka, N.; Habuchi, T.; Horikawa, Y.; Hashimoto, Y.; Yoneyama, T.; Mori, K.; Koie, T.; et al. A novel strategy for evasion of NK cell immunity by tumours expressing core2 O-glycans. EMBO J. 2011, 30, 3173–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tsuboi, S. Tumor defense systems using O-glycans. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 35, 1633–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Galli-Stampino, L.; Meinjohanns, E.; Frische, K.; Meldal, M.; Jensen, T.; Werdelin, O.; Mouritsen, S. T-cell recognition of tumor-associated carbohydrates: The nature of the glycan moiety plays a decisive role in determining glycopeptide immunogenicity. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 3214–3222. [Google Scholar]
  48. Snijdewint, F.G.; von Mensdorff-Pouilly, S.; Karuntu-Wanamarta, A.H.; Verstraeten, A.A.; Livingston, P.O.; Hilgers, J.; Kenemans, P. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity can be induced by MUC1 peptide vaccination of breast cancer patients. Int. J. Cancer 2001, 93, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pashov, A.; Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Chow, M.; Cannon, M.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Immune surveillance as a rationale for immunotherapy? Hum. Vaccin. 2007, 3, 224–228. [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Kooyk, Y.; Rabinovich, G.A. Protein-glycan interactions in the control of innate and adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pashov, A.; Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Raghava, G.P.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Bridging innate and adaptive antitumor immunity targeting glycans. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Freire, T.; Osinaga, E. The sweet side of tumor immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2012, 4, 719–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Olive, C. Pattern recognition receptors: Sentinels in innate immunity and targets of new vaccine adjuvants. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2012, 11, 237–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Krishnaswamy, J.K.; Chu, T.; Eisenbarth, S.C. Beyond pattern recognition: NOD-like receptors in dendritic cells. Trends Immunol. 2013, 34, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Davicino, R.C.; Elicabe, R.J.; di Genaro, M.S.; Rabinovich, G.A. Coupling pathogen recognition to innate immunity through glycan-dependent mechanisms. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2011, 11, 1457–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schwartz-Albiez, R. Naturally occurring antibodies directed against carbohydrate tumor antigens. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012, 750, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rodriguez-Zhurbenko, N.; Martinez, D.; Blanco, R.; Rondon, T.; Grinan, T.; Hernandez, A.M. Human antibodies reactive to NeuGcGM3 ganglioside have cytotoxic anti-tumor properties. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 14, 201242693. [Google Scholar]
  58. Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Artaud, C.; Jousheghany, F.; Hennings, L.; Carcel-Trullols, J.; Shaaf, S.; Korourian, S.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Reduction of spontaneous metastases through induction of carbohydrate cross-reactive apoptotic antibodies. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 7057–7065. [Google Scholar]
  59. Farag, S.S.; Caligiuri, M.A. Human natural killer cell development and biology. Blood Rev. 2006, 20, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Koch, J.; Steinle, A.; Watzl, C.; Mandelboim, O. Activating natural cytotoxicity receptors of natural killer cells in cancer and infection. Trends Immunol. 2013, 34, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Porgador, A. Natural cytotoxicity receptors: Pattern recognition and involvement of carbohydrates. ScientificWorldJournal 2005, 5, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Disis, M.L. Immune regulation of cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 4531–4538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Backer, A.E.; Holgersson, J.; Samuelsson, B.E.; Karlsson, H. Rapid and sensitive GC/MS characterization of glycolipid released Galalpha1,3Gal-terminated oligosaccharides from small organ specimens of a single pig. Glycobiology 1998, 8, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hallberg, E.C.; Holgersson, J.; Samuelsson, B.E. Glycosphingolipid expression in pig aorta: Identification of possible target antigens for human natural antibodies. Glycobiology 1998, 8, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bouhours, D.; Liaigre, J.; Lemoine, J.; Mayer-Posner, F.; Bouhours, J.F. Two novel isoneolacto-undecaglycosylceramides carrying Galalpha1-->3Lewis(x) on the 6-linked antenna and N-acetylneuraminic acidalpha2-->3 or Galactose alpha1-->3 on the 3-linked antenna, expressed in porcine kidney. Glycoconj. J. 1998, 15, 1001–1016. [Google Scholar]
  66. Macher, B.A.; Galili, U. The Galalpha1,3Galbeta1,4GlcNAc-R (alpha-Gal) epitope: A carbohydrate of unique evolution and clinical relevance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1780, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stussi, G.; Mueller, R.J.; Passweg, J.; Schanz, U.; Rieben, R.; Seebach, J.D. ABO blood group incompatible haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and xenograft rejection. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2007, 137, 101S–108S. [Google Scholar]
  68. Gates, M.A.; Wolpin, B.M.; Cramer, D.W.; Hankinson, S.E.; Tworoger, S.S. ABO blood group and incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hakomori, S. Antigen structure and genetic basis of histo-blood groups A, B and O: Their changes associated with human cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1473, 247–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lin, S.S.; Parker, W.; Everett, M.L.; Platt, J.L. Differential recognition by proteins of alpha-galactosyl residues on endothelial cell surfaces. Glycobiology 1998, 8, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Korourian, S.; Siegel, E.; Kieber-Emmons, T.; Monzavi-Karbassi, B. Expression analysis of carbohydrate antigens in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by lectin histochemistry. BMC Cancer 2008, 8, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Preiss, S.; Kammertoens, T.; Lampert, C.; Willimsky, G.; Blankenstein, T. Tumor-induced antibodies resemble the response to tissue damage. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 115, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Spalter, S.H.; Kaveri, S.V.; Bonnin, E.; Mani, J.C.; Cartron, J.P.; Kazatchkine, M.D. Normal human serum contains natural antibodies reactive with autologous ABO blood group antigens. Blood 1999, 93, 4418–4424. [Google Scholar]
  74. Galili, U. The alpha-gal epitope and the anti-Gal antibody in xenotransplantation and in cancer immunotherapy. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2005, 83, 674–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Galili, U. Immune response, accommodation, and tolerance to transplantation carbohydrate antigens. Transplantation 2004, 78, 1093–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Apostolopoulos, V.; Osinski, C.; McKenzie, I.F. MUC1 cross-reactive Gal alpha(1,3)Gal antibodies in humans switch immune responses from cellular to humoral. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Abdel-Motal, U.M.; Wigglesworth, K.; Galili, U. Mechanism for increased immunogenicity of vaccines that form in vivo immune complexes with the natural anti-Gal antibody. Vaccine 2009, 27, 3072–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cobb, B.A.; Kasper, D.L. Coming of age: Carbohydrates and immunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005, 35, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jackson, S.; Folks, T.M.; Wetterskog, D.L.; Kindt, T.J. A rabbit helper T cell clone reactive against group-specific streptococcal carbohydrate. J. Immunol. 1984, 133, 1553–1557. [Google Scholar]
  80. Petersen, J.; Purcell, A.W.; Rossjohn, J. Post-translationally modified T cell epitopes: Immune recognition and immunotherapy. J. Mol. Med. 2009, 87, 1045–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Szabo, T.G.; Palotai, R.; Antal, P.; Tokatly, I.; Tothfalusi, L.; Lund, O.; Nagy, G.; Falus, A.; Buzas, E.I. Critical role of glycosylation in determining the length and structure of T cell epitopes. Immun. Res. 2009, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhao, X.J.; Cheung, N.K. GD2 oligosaccharide: Target for cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1995, 182, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tzianabos, A.O.; Finberg, R.W.; Wang, Y.; Chan, M.; Onderdonk, A.B.; Jennings, H.J.; Kasper, D.L. T cells activated by zwitterionic molecules prevent abscesses induced by pathogenic bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 6733–6740. [Google Scholar]
  84. Cobb, B.A.; Kasper, D.L. Characteristics of carbohydrate antigen binding to the presentation protein HLA-DR. Glycobiology 2008, 18, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Haurum, J.S.; Arsequell, G.; Lellouch, A.C.; Wong, S.Y.; Dwek, R.A.; McMichael, A.J.; Elliott, T. Recognition of carbohydrate by major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted, glycopeptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1994, 180, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Haurum, J.S.; Hoier, I.B.; Arsequell, G.; Neisig, A.; Valencia, G.; Zeuthen, J.; Neefjes, J.; Elliott, T. Presentation of cytosolic glycosylated peptides by human class I major histocompatibility complex molecules in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 190, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Haurum, J.S.; Tan, L.; Arsequell, G.; Frodsham, P.; Lellouch, A.C.; Moss, P.A.; Dwek, R.A.; McMichael, A.J.; Elliott, T. Peptide anchor residue glycosylation: Effect on class I major histocompatibility complex binding and cytotoxic T lymphocyte recognition. Eur. J. Immunol. 1995, 25, 3270–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Carbone, F.R.; Gleeson, P.A. Carbohydrates and antigen recognition by T cells. Glycobiology 1997, 7, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Madsen, C.B.; Petersen, C.; Lavrsen, K.; Harndahl, M.; Buus, S.; Clausen, H.; Pedersen, A.E.; Wandall, H.H. Cancer associated aberrant protein O-glycosylation can modify antigen processing and immune response. PLoS One 2012, 7, e50139. [Google Scholar]
  90. Muthukkumar, S.; Stein, K.E. Immunization with meningococcal polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate induces polysaccharide-reactive T cells in mice. Vaccine 2004, 22, 1290–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Glithero, A.; Tormo, J.; Haurum, J.S.; Arsequell, G.; Valencia, G.; Edwards, J.; Springer, S.; Townsend, A.; Pao, Y.L.; Wormald, M.; et al. Crystal structures of two H-2Db/glycopeptide complexes suggest a molecular basis for CTL cross-reactivity. Immunity 1999, 10, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Speir, J.A.; Abdel-Motal, U.M.; Jondal, M.; Wilson, I.A. Crystal structure of an MHC class I presented glycopeptide that generates carbohydrate-specific CTL. Immunity 1999, 10, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Stepensky, D.; Tzehoval, E.; Vadai, E.; Eisenbach, L. O-glycosylated versus non-glycosylated MUC1-derived peptides as potential targets for cytotoxic immunotherapy of carcinoma. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2006, 143, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bohm, C.M.; Mulder, M.C.; Zennadi, R.; Notter, M.; Schmitt-Graff, A.; Finn, O.J.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Stein, H.; Clausen, H.; Riecken, E.O.; et al. Carbohydrate recognition on MUC1-expressing targets enhances cytotoxicity of a T cell subpopulation. Scand. J. Immunol. 1997, 46, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Abdel-Motal, U.M.; Berg, L.; Rosen, A.; Bengtsson, M.; Thorpe, C.J.; Kihlberg, J.; Dahmen, J.; Magnusson, G.; Karlsson, K.A.; Jondal, M. Immunization with glycosylated Kb-binding peptides generates carbohydrate-specific, unrestricted cytotoxic T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 1996, 26, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Qiu, J.; Luo, P.; Wasmund, K.; Steplewski, Z.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Towards the development of peptide mimotopes of carbohydrate antigens as cancer vaccines. Hybridoma 1999, 18, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Luo, P.; Canziani, G.; Cunto-Amesty, G.; Kieber-Emmons, T. A molecular basis for functional peptide mimicry of a carbohydrate antigen. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 16146–16154. [Google Scholar]
  98. Pashov, A.; Perry, M.; Dyar, M.; Chow, M.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Carbohydrate mimotopes in the rational design of cancer vaccines. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 1171–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Cunto-Amesty, G.; Luo, P.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Peptide mimotopes as surrogate antigens of carbohydrates in vaccine discovery. Trends Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Cunto-Amesty, G.; Luo, P.; Shamloo, S.; Blaszcyk-Thurin, M.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Immunization with a carbohydrate mimicking peptide augments tumor-specific cellular responses. Int. Immunol. 2001, 13, 1361–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Luo, P.; Jousheghany, F.; Torres-Quinones, M.; Cunto-Amesty, G.; Artaud, C.; Kieber-Emmons, T. A mimic of tumor rejection antigen-associated carbohydrates mediates an antitumor cellular response. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 2162–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wondimu, A.; Zhang, T.; Kieber-Emmons, T.; Gimotty, P.; Sproesser, K.; Somasundaram, R.; Ferrone, S.; Tsao, C.Y.; Herlyn, D. Peptides mimicking GD2 ganglioside elicit cellular, humoral and tumor-protective immune responses in mice. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2008, 57, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wierzbicki, A.; Gil, M.; Ciesielski, M.; Fenstermaker, R.A.; Kaneko, Y.; Rokita, H.; Lau, J.T.; Kozbor, D. Immunization with a mimotope of GD2 ganglioside induces CD8+ T cells that recognize cell adhesion molecules on tumor cells. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 6644–6653. [Google Scholar]
  104. Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Hennings, L.J.; Artaud, C.; Liu, T.; Jousheghany, F.; Pashov, A.; Murali, R.; Hutchins, L.F.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Preclinical studies of carbohydrate mimetic peptide vaccines for breast cancer and melanoma. Vaccine 2007, 25, 3022–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Saijo, N.; Ozaki, A.; Beppu, Y.; Takahashi, K.; Fujita, J.; Sasaki, Y.; Nomori, H.; Kimata, M.; Shimizu, E.; Hoshi, A. Analysis of metastatic spread and growth of tumor cells in mice with depressed natural killer activity by anti-asialo GM1 antibody or anticancer agents. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 1984, 107, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wiltrout, R.H.; Herberman, R.B.; Zhang, S.R.; Chirigos, M.A.; Ortaldo, J.R.; Green, K.M., Jr.; Talmadge, J.E. Role of organ-associated NK cells in decreased formation of experimental metastases in lung and liver. J. Immunol. 1985, 134, 4267–4275. [Google Scholar]
  107. Bezouska, K.; Yuen, C.T.; O’Brien, J.; Childs, R.A.; Chai, W.; Lawson, A.M.; Drbal, K.; Fiserova, A.; Pospisil, M.; Feizi, T. Oligosaccharide ligands for NKR-P1 protein activate NK cells and cytotoxicity. Nature 1994, 372, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Brown, M.G.; Scalzo, A.A. NK gene complex dynamics and selection for NK cell receptors. Semin. Immunol. 2008, 20, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cheent, K.; Khakoo, S.I. Natural killer cells: Integrating diversity with function. Immunology 2009, 126, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Biassoni, R. Natural killer cell receptors. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 640, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lanier, L.L. NK cell recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 23, 225–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Fauriat, C.; Ivarsson, M.A.; Ljunggren, H.G.; Malmberg, K.J.; Michaelsson, J. Education of human natural killer cells by activating killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors. Blood 2010, 115, 1166–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Foley, B.; de Santis, D.; Lathbury, L.; Christiansen, F.; Witt, C. KIR2DS1-mediated activation overrides NKG2A-mediated inhibition in HLA-C C2-negative individuals. Int. Immunol. 2008, 20, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Omidvar, N.; Wang, E.C.; Brennan, P.; Longhi, M.P.; Smith, R.A.; Morgan, B.P. Expression of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored CD59 on target cells enhances human NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 2915–2923. [Google Scholar]
  115. Tarek, N.; Le Luduec, J.B.; Gallagher, M.M.; Zheng, J.; Venstrom, J.M.; Chamberlain, E.; Modak, S.; Heller, G.; Dupont, B.; Cheung, N.K.; et al. Unlicensed NK cells target neuroblastoma following anti-GD2 antibody treatment. J. Clin. Invest. 2012, 122, 3260–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cheung, N.K.; Kushner, B.H.; Cheung, I.Y.; Kramer, K.; Canete, A.; Gerald, W.; Bonilla, M.A.; Finn, R.; Yeh, S.J.; Larson, S.M. Anti-G(D2) antibody treatment of minimal residual stage 4 neuroblastoma diagnosed at more than 1 year of age. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998, 16, 3053–3060. [Google Scholar]
  117. Modak, S.; Cheung, N.K. Neuroblastoma: Therapeutic strategies for a clinical enigma. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2010, 36, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yu, A.L.; Gilman, A.L.; Ozkaynak, M.F.; London, W.B.; Kreissman, S.G.; Chen, H.X.; Smith, M.; Anderson, B.; Villablanca, J.G.; Matthay, K.K.; et al. Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1324–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Alderson, K.L.; Luangrath, M.; Elsenheimer, M.M.; Gillies, S.D.; Navid, F.; Rakhmilevich, A.L.; Sondel, P.M. Enhancement of the anti-melanoma response of Hu14.18K322A by alphaCD40+ CpG. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2012, 15, 15. [Google Scholar]
  120. Esser, R.; Muller, T.; Stefes, D.; Kloess, S.; Seidel, D.; Gillies, S.D.; Aperlo-Iffland, C.; Huston, J.S.; Uherek, C.; Schonfeld, K.; et al. NK cells engineered to express a GD2-specific antigen receptor display built-in ADCC-like activity against tumour cells of neuroectodermal origin. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hombach, A.A.; Holzinger, A.; Abken, H. The weal and woe of costimulation in the adoptive therapy of cancer with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-redirected T cells. Curr. Mol. Med. 2012, 31, 31. [Google Scholar]
  122. Albertsson, P.A.; Basse, P.H.; Hokland, M.; Goldfarb, R.H.; Nagelkerke, J.F.; Nannmark, U.; Kuppen, P.J. NK cells and the tumour microenvironment: Implications for NK-cell function and anti-tumour activity. Trends Immunol. 2003, 24, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Parkhurst, M.R.; Riley, J.P.; Dudley, M.E.; Rosenberg, S.A. Adoptive transfer of autologous natural killer cells leads to high levels of circulating natural killer cells but does not mediate tumor regression. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 6287–6297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kariya, Y.; Kawamura, C.; Tabei, T.; Gu, J. Bisecting GlcNAc residues on laminin-332 down-regulate galectin-3-dependent keratinocyte motility. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 285, 3330–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chung, T.W.; Kim, K.S.; Kang, S.K.; Lee, J.W.; Song, E.Y.; Chung, T.H.; Yeom, Y.I.; Kim, C.H. Remodeling of the major mouse xenoantigen, Galalpha1-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAc-R, by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-III. Mol. Cells 2003, 16, 343–353. [Google Scholar]
  126. Hershkovitz, O.; Jivov, S.; Bloushtain, N.; Zilka, A.; Landau, G.; Bar-Ilan, A.; Lichtenstein, R.G.; Campbell, K.S.; van Kuppevelt, T.H.; Porgador, A. Characterization of the recognition of tumor cells by the natural cytotoxicity receptor, NKp44. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 7426–7436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Byrd, A.; Hoffmann, S.C.; Jarahian, M.; Momburg, F.; Watzl, C. Expression analysis of the ligands for the Natural Killer cell receptors NKp30 and NKp44. PLoS One 2007, 2, e1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Higai, K.; Ichikawa, A.; Matsumoto, K. Binding of sialyl Lewis X antigen to lectin-like receptors on NK cells induces cytotoxicity and tyrosine phosphorylation of a 17-kDa protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1760, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ito, K.; Higai, K.; Shinoda, C.; Sakurai, M.; Yanai, K.; Azuma, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Unlike natural killer (NK) p30, natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp44 binds to multimeric alpha2,3-NeuNAc-containing N-glycans. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 35, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kovalenko, E.I.; Abakushina, E.; Telford, W.; Kapoor, V.; Korchagina, E.; Khaidukov, S.; Molotkovskaya, I.; Sapozhnikov, A.; Vlaskin, P.; Bovin, N. Clustered carbohydrates as a target for natural killer cells: A model system. Histochem. Cell. Biol. 2007, 127, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bezouska, K.; Kren, V.; Kieburg, C.; Lindhorst, T.K. GlcNAc-terminated glycodendrimers form defined precipitates with the soluble dimeric receptor of rat natural killer cells, sNKR-P1A. FEBS Lett. 1998, 426, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Benson, V.; Grobarova, V.; Richter, J.; Fiserova, A. Glycosylation regulates NK cell-mediated effector function through PI3K pathway. Int. Immunol. 2010, 22, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Grayson, G.; Ladisch, S. Immunosuppression by human gangliosides. II. Carbohydrate structure and inhibition of human NK activity. Cell. Immunol. 1992, 139, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nicoll, G.; Avril, T.; Lock, K.; Furukawa, K.; Bovin, N.; Crocker, P.R. Ganglioside GD3 expression on target cells can modulate NK cell cytotoxicity via siglec-7-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 1642–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kawasaki, Y.; Ito, A.; Withers, D.A.; Taima, T.; Kakoi, N.; Saito, S.; Arai, Y. Ganglioside DSGb5, preferred ligand for Siglec-7, inhibits NK cell cytotoxicity against renal cell carcinoma cells. Glycobiology 2010, 20, 1373–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Belisle, J.A.; Horibata, S.; Jennifer, G.A.; Petrie, S.; Kapur, A.; Andre, S.; Gabius, H.J.; Rancourt, C.; Connor, J.; Paulson, J.C.; et al. Identification of Siglec-9 as the receptor for MUC16 on human NK cells, B cells, and monocytes. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 118. [Google Scholar]
  137. Yarema, K.J.; Bertozzi, C.R. Chemical approaches to glycobiology and emerging carbohydrate-based therapeutic agents. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Guo, Z.; Wang, Q. Recent development in carbohydrate-based cancer vaccines. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 608–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Costa, C.; Zhao, L.; Burton, W.V.; Bondioli, K.R.; Williams, B.L.; Hoagland, T.A.; Ditullio, P.A.; Ebert, K.M.; Fodor, W.L. Expression of the human alpha1,2-fucosyltransferase in transgenic pigs modifies the cell surface carbohydrate phenotype and confers resistance to human serum-mediated cytolysis. FASEB J. 1999, 13, 1762–1773. [Google Scholar]
  140. Artrip, J.H.; Kwiatkowski, P.; Michler, R.E.; Wang, S.F.; Tugulea, S.; Ankersmit, J.; Chisholm, L.; McKenzie, I.F.; Sandrin, M.S.; Itescu, S. Target cell susceptibility to lysis by human natural killer cells is augmented by alpha(1,3)-galactosyltransferase and reduced by alpha(1,2)-fucosyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 10717–10722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Horvath-Arcidiacono, J.A.; Porter, C.M.; Bloom, E.T. Human NK cells can lyse porcine endothelial cells independent of their expression of Galalpha(1,3)-Gal and killing is enhanced by activation of either effector or target cells. Xenotransplantation 2006, 13, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Dennis, J.W. N-linked oligosaccharide processing and tumor cell biology. Semin. Cancer Biol. 1991, 2, 411–420. [Google Scholar]
  143. Humphries, M.J.; Matsumoto, K.; White, S.L.; Olden, K. Inhibition of experimental metastasis by castanospermine in mice: Blockage of two distinct stages of tumor colonization by oligosaccharide processing inhibitors. Cancer Res. 1986, 46, 5215–5222. [Google Scholar]
  144. Chen, L.; Sundback, J.; Olofsson, S.; Jondal, M. Interference with O-glycosylation in RMA lymphoma cells leads to a reduced in vivo growth of the tumor. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 119, 1495–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Andre, S.; Sanchez-Ruderisch, H.; Nakagawa, H.; Buchholz, M.; Kopitz, J.; Forberich, P.; Kemmner, W.; Bock, C.; Deguchi, K.; Detjen, K.M.; et al. Tumor suppressor p16INK4a—Modulator of glycomic profile and galectin-1 expression to increase susceptibility to carbohydrate-dependent induction of anoikis in pancreatic carcinoma cells. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 3233–3256. [Google Scholar]
  146. Wen, Y.J.; Mancino, A.; Pashov, A.; Whitehead, T.; Stanley, J.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Antigen binding of human IgG Fabs mediate ERK-associated proliferation of human breast cancer cells. DNA Cell Biol. 2005, 24, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Nobumoto, A.; Oomizu, S.; Arikawa, T.; Katoh, S.; Nagahara, K.; Miyake, M.; Nishi, N.; Takeshita, K.; Niki, T.; Yamauchi, A.; et al. Galectin-9 expands unique macrophages exhibiting plasmacytoid dendritic cell-like phenotypes that activate NK cells in tumor-bearing mice. Clin. Immunol. 2009, 130, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Irie, R.F.; Morton, D.L. Regression of cutaneous metastatic melanoma by intralesional injection with human monoclonal antibody to ganglioside GD2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 8694–8698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Takahashi, T.; Johnson, T.D.; Nishinaka, Y.; Morton, D.L.; Irie, R.F. IgM anti-ganglioside antibodies induced by melanoma cell vaccine correlate with survival of melanoma patients. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1999, 112, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Perez, C.A.; Ravindranath, M.H.; Soh, D.; Gonzales, A.; Ye, W.; Morton, D.L. Serum anti-ganglioside IgM antibodies in soft tissue sarcoma: Clinical prognostic implications. Cancer J. 2002, 8, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kawashima, I.; Yoshida, Y.; Taya, C.; Shitara, H.; Yonekawa, H.; Karasuyama, H.; Tada, N.; Furukawa, K.; Tai, T. Expansion of natural killer cells in mice transgenic for IgM antibody to ganglioside GD2: Demonstration of prolonged survival after challenge with syngeneic tumor cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2003, 23, 381–388. [Google Scholar]
  152. Bao, Y.; Han, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xu, S.; Cao, X. IFN-alpha-producing PDCA-1+ Siglec-H-B cells mediate innate immune defense by activating NK cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011, 41, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Hsueh, E.C.; Gupta, R.K.; Qi, K.; Morton, D.L. Correlation of specific immune responses with survival in melanoma patients with distant metastases receiving polyvalent melanoma cell vaccine. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998, 16, 2913–2920. [Google Scholar]
  154. Baumgarth, N.; Herman, O.C.; Jager, G.C.; Brown, L.E.; Herzenberg, L.A.; Chen, J. B-1 and B-2 cell-derived immunoglobulin M antibodies are nonredundant components of the protective response to influenza virus infection. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Diamond, M.S.; Sitati, E.M.; Friend, L.D.; Higgs, S.; Shrestha, B.; Engle, M. A critical role for induced IgM in the protection against West Nile virus infection. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 1853–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Brandlein, S.; Pohle, T.; Ruoff, N.; Wozniak, E.; Muller-Hermelink, H.K.; Vollmers, H.P. Natural IgM antibodies and immunosurveillance mechanisms against epithelial cancer cells in humans. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 7995–8005. [Google Scholar]
  157. Vollmers, H.P.; Brandlein, S. The “early birds”: Natural IgM antibodies and immune surveillance. Histol. Histopathol. 2005, 20, 927–937. [Google Scholar]
  158. Yamada, K.; Kinoshita, M.; Hayakawa, T.; Nakaya, S.; Kakehi, K. Comparative studies on the structural features of O-glycans between leukemia and epithelial cell lines. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 521–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Xin, X.; Higai, K.; Imaizumi, Y.; Suzuki, C.; Ito, K.; Itoh, A.; Matsumoto, S.; Azuma, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Natural killer group 2A (NKG2A) and natural killer group 2C (NKG2C) bind to sulfated glycans and alpha2,3-NeuAc-containing glycoproteins. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2011, 34, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Hennings, L.; Artaud, C.; Jousheghany, F.; Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Pashov, A.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Carbohydrate mimetic peptides augment carbohydrate-reactive immune responses in the absence of immune pathology. Cancers 2011, 3, 4151–4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Hirohashi, S.; Clausen, H.; Yamada, T.; Shimosato, Y.; Hakomori, S. Blood group A cross-reacting epitope defined by monoclonal antibodies NCC-LU-35 and -81 expressed in cancer of blood group O or B individuals: Its identification as Tn antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 7039–7043. [Google Scholar]
  162. Galili, U.; Buehler, J.; Shohet, S.B.; Macher, B.A. The human natural anti-Gal IgG. III. The subtlety of immune tolerance in man as demonstrated by crossreactivity between natural anti-Gal and anti-B antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 1987, 165, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Sandrin, M.S.; Vaughan, H.A.; Xing, P.X.; McKenzie, I.F. Natural human anti-Gal alpha(1,3)Gal antibodies react with human mucin peptides. Glycoconj. J. 1997, 14, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Manches, O.; Plumas, J.; Lui, G.; Chaperot, L.; Molens, J.P.; Sotto, J.J.; Bensa, J.C.; Galili, U. Anti-Gal-mediated targeting of human B lymphoma cells to antigen-presenting cells: A potential method for immunotherapy using autologous tumor cells. Haematologica 2005, 90, 625–634. [Google Scholar]
  165. Corbiere, V.; Chapiro, J.; Stroobant, V.; Ma, W.; Lurquin, C.; Lethe, B.; van Baren, N.; van den Eynde, B.J.; Boon, T.; Coulie, P.G. Antigen spreading contributes to MAGE vaccination-induced regression of melanoma metastases. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Butschak, G.; Karsten, U. Isolation and characterization of thomsen-friedenreich-specific antibodies from human serum. Tumour Biol. 2002, 23, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Andre, F.; Dieci, M.V.; Dubsky, P.; Sotiriou, C.; Curigliano, G.; Denkert, C.; Loi, S. Molecular pathways: Involvement of immune pathways in the therapeutic response and outcome in breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Kurtenkov, O.; Klaamas, K.; Mensdorff-Pouilly, S.; Miljukhina, L.; Shljapnikova, L.; Chuzmarov, V. Humoral immune response to MUC1 and to the Thomsen-Friedenreich (TF) glycotope in patients with gastric cancer: Relation to survival. Acta Oncol. 2007, 46, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Smorodin, E.P.; Kurtenkov, O.A.; Sergeyev, B.L.; Kodar, K.E.; Chuzmarov, V.I.; Afanasyev, V.P. Postoperative change of anti-Thomsen-Friedenreich and Tn IgG level: The follow-up study of gastrointestinal cancer patients. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 4352–4358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Ragupathi, G.; Gathuru, J.; Livingston, P. Antibody inducing polyvalent cancer vaccines. Cancer Treat. Res. 2005, 123, 157–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Johnston, D.; Bystryn, J.C. Heterogeneous antibody response to polyvalent melanoma vaccines in syngeneic mice. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2005, 54, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Liu, C.C.; Ye, X.S. Carbohydrate-based cancer vaccines: Target cancer with sugar bullets. Glycoconj. J. 2012, 29, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Yin, Z.; Huang, X. Recent development in carbohydrate based anti-cancer vaccines. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2012, 31, 143–186. [Google Scholar]
  174. Hevey, R.; Ling, C.C. Recent advances in developing synthetic carbohydrate-based vaccines for cancer immunotherapies. Future Med. Chem. 2012, 4, 545–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Zhu, J.; Warren, J.D.; Danishefsky, S.J. Synthetic carbohydrate-based anticancer vaccines: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2009, 8, 1399–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Xu, Y.; Gendler, S.J.; Franco, A. Designer glycopeptides for cytotoxic T cell-based elimination of carcinomas. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 199, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Singh, S.K.; Stephani, J.; Schaefer, M.; Kalay, H.; Garcia-Vallejo, J.J.; den Haan, J.; Saeland, E.; Sparwasser, T.; van Kooyk, Y. Targeting glycan modified OVA to murine DC-SIGN transgenic dendritic cells enhances MHC class I and II presentation. Mol. Immunol. 2009, 47, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Singh, S.K.; Streng-Ouwehand, I.; Litjens, M.; Kalay, H.; Saeland, E.; van Kooyk, Y. Tumour-associated glycan modifications of antigen enhance MGL2 dependent uptake and MHC class I restricted CD8 T cell responses. Int. J. Cancer. 2011, 128, 1371–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Denda-Nagai, K.; Aida, S.; Saba, K.; Suzuki, K.; Moriyama, S.; Oo-Puthinan, S.; Tsuiji, M.; Morikawa, A.; Kumamoto, Y.; Sugiura, D.; et al. Distribution and function of macrophage galactose-type C-type lectin 2 (MGL2/CD301b): Efficient uptake and presentation of glycosylated antigens by dendritic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 19193–19204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Lakshminarayanan, V.; Thompson, P.; Wolfert, M.A.; Buskas, T.; Bradley, J.M.; Pathangey, L.B.; Madsen, C.S.; Cohen, P.A.; Gendler, S.J.; Boons, G.J. Immune recognition of tumor-associated mucin MUC1 is achieved by a fully synthetic aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 tripartite vaccine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Samsen, A.; Bogoevska, V.; Klampe, B.; Bamberger, A.M.; Lucka, L.; Horst, A.K.; Nollau, P.; Wagener, C. DC-SIGN and SRCL bind glycans of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CEA-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1): Recombinant human glycan-binding receptors as analytical tools. Eur. Cell Biol. 2010, 89, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Saeland, E.; van Vliet, S.J.; Backstrom, M.; van den Berg, V.C.; Geijtenbeek, T.B.; Meijer, G.A.; van Kooyk, Y. The C-type lectin MGL expressed by dendritic cells detects glycan changes on MUC1 in colon carcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2007, 56, 1225–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Sato, K.; Imai, Y.; Higashi, N.; Kumamoto, Y.; Mukaida, N.; Irimura, T. Redistributions of macrophages expressing the macrophage galactose-type C-type lectin (MGL) during antigen-induced chronic granulation tissue formation. Int. Immunol. 2005, 17, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Chun, K.H.; Imai, Y.; Higashi, N.; Irimura, T. Migration of dermal cells expressing a macrophage C-type lectin during the sensitization phase of delayed-type hypersensitivity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2000, 68, 471–478. [Google Scholar]
  185. Becker, Y. Molecular immunological approaches to biotherapy of human cancers—A review, hypothesis and implications. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26, 1113–1134. [Google Scholar]
  186. Botella-Estrada, R.; Escudero, M.; O’Connor, J.E.; Nagore, E.; Fenollosa, B.; Sanmartin, O.; Requena, C.; Guillen, C. Cytokine production by peripheral lymphocytes in melanoma. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2005, 16, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  187. Knutson, K.L.; Disis, M.L. Tumor antigen-specific T helper cells in cancer immunity and immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2005, 54, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Van Die, I.; Cummings, R.D. Glycan gimmickry by parasitic helminths: A strategy for modulating the host immune response? Glycobiology 2009, 20, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Minkis, K.; Kavanagh, D.G.; Alter, G.; Bogunovic, D.; O’Neill, D.; Adams, S.; Pavlick, A.; Walker, B.D.; Brockman, M.A.; Gandhi, R.T.; et al. Type 2 Bias of T cells expanded from the blood of melanoma patients switched to type 1 by IL-12p70 mRNA-transfected dendritic cells. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 9441–9450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Shamloo, S.; Kieber-Emmons, M.; Jousheghany, F.; Luo, P.; Lin, K.Y.; Cunto-Amesty, G.; Weiner, D.B.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Priming characteristics of peptide mimotopes of carbohydrate antigens. Vaccine 2003, 21, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Pashov, A.D.; Plaxco, J.; Kaveri, S.V.; Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Harn, D.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Multiple antigenic mimotopes of HIV carbohydrate antigens: Relating structure and antigenicity. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 29675–29683. [Google Scholar]
  192. Hermsen, B.B.; Verheijen, R.H.; Menko, F.H.; Gille, J.J.; van Uffelen, K.; Blankenstein, M.A.; Meijer, S.; van Diest, P.J.; Kenemans, P.; von Mensdorff-Pouilly, S. Humoral immune responses to MUC1 in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Eur. J. Cancer 2007, 43, 1556–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Klinman, N.R. The mechanism of antigenic stimulation of primary and secondary clonal precursor cells. J. Exp. Med. 1972, 136, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Joncker, N.T.; Fernandez, N.C.; Treiner, E.; Vivier, E.; Raulet, D.H. NK cell responsiveness is tuned commensurate with the number of inhibitory receptors for self-MHC class I: The rheostat model. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4572–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Joncker, N.T.; Shifrin, N.; Delebecque, F.; Raulet, D.H. Mature natural killer cells reset their responsiveness when exposed to an altered MHC environment. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 2065–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Monzavi-Karbassi, B.; Pashov, A.; Kieber-Emmons, T. Tumor-Associated Glycans and Immune Surveillance. Vaccines 2013, 1, 174-203.

AMA Style

Monzavi-Karbassi B, Pashov A, Kieber-Emmons T. Tumor-Associated Glycans and Immune Surveillance. Vaccines. 2013; 1(2):174-203.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Monzavi-Karbassi, Behjatolah, Anastas Pashov, and Thomas Kieber-Emmons. 2013. "Tumor-Associated Glycans and Immune Surveillance" Vaccines 1, no. 2: 174-203.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop