Next Article in Journal
Phenolic Compounds and Bioaccessibility Thereof in Functional Pasta
Next Article in Special Issue
Perivascular Adipose Tissue as a Target for Antioxidant Therapy for Cardiovascular Complications
Previous Article in Journal
Human Keratinocyte UVB-Protective Effects of a Low Molecular Weight Fucoidan from Sargassum horneri Purified by Step Gradient Ethanol Precipitation
Previous Article in Special Issue
PCSK9 Regulates Nox2-Mediated Platelet Activation via CD36 Receptor in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Coenzyme Q10: Clinical Applications in Cardiovascular Diseases

Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56120 Pisa, Italy
Interdepartmental Research Centre “Nutraceuticals and Food for Health (NUTRAFOOD)”, University of Pisa, 56120 Pisa, Italy
Interdepartmental Research Centre of Ageing, Biology and Pathology, University of Pisa, 56120 Pisa, Italy
Department of Science and Drug Technology, University of Turin, 10125 Turin, Italy
Italian Nutraceutical Society (SINut), Via Guelfa 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Medical and Surgical Sciences Department, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2020, 9(4), 341;
Submission received: 25 March 2020 / Revised: 18 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 22 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidant Therapy in Cardiovascular Medicine: Bench to Bedside)


Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is a ubiquitous factor present in cell membranes and mitochondria, both in its reduced (ubiquinol) and oxidized (ubiquinone) forms. Its levels are high in organs with high metabolism such as the heart, kidneys, and liver because it acts as an energy transfer molecule but could be reduced by aging, genetic factors, drugs (e.g., statins), cardiovascular (CV) diseases, degenerative muscle disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases. As CoQ10 is endowed with significant antioxidant and anti-inflammatory features, useful to prevent free radical-induced damage and inflammatory signaling pathway activation, its depletion results in exacerbation of inflammatory processes. Therefore, exogenous CoQ10 supplementation might be useful as an adjuvant in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction and in associated risk factors such as hypertension, insulin resistance, dyslipidemias, and obesity. This review aims to summarize the current evidences on the use of CoQ10 supplementation as a therapeutic approach in cardiovascular diseases through the analysis of its clinical impact on patients’ health and quality of life. A substantial reduction of inflammatory and oxidative stress markers has been observed in several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) focused on several of the abovementioned diseases, even if more RCTs, involving a larger number of patients, will be necessary to strengthen these interesting findings.

1. Introduction

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is an organic molecule that was identified for the first time by Frederick Crane of Wisconsin (USA) in 1957 [1]. It is ubiquitously present in cell membranes and especially in the mitochondria in both reduced (ubiquinol) and oxidized (ubiquinone) forms (Figure 1). Chemically, it is constituted of a benzoquinone group and a poly-isoprenoid side chain that is species specific. In the human, it is composed of 10 units and called CoQ10 or ubiquinone [2]. This molecule can sustain continuous oxidation–reduction cycles and is an excellent electron carrier. CoQ10 concentration is particularly high in organs such as the kidneys, heart, and liver (Table 1) because they need it as an efficient energy transfer molecule supporting their high metabolic rate [3].
Physiologically, CoQ10 is anchored in the cell membrane through the isoprenoid tail, whereas the benzoquinone ring moves in the membrane based on its redox state. The most prominent role of CoQ10 is to facilitate the production of ATP through participation in the electron transport chain in the mitochondria. In fact, in the respiratory chain, CoQ10 transfers electrons from complex I (nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide (NADH)-coenzyme Q reductase) or complex II (succinate-coenzyme Q reductase) to complex III (cytochrome c reductase), and it is also a structural component of both CI and CIII, reducing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [6,7].
Moreover, CoQ10 is able to accept electrons from fatty acyl-coenzyme A (acyl-CoA) dehydrogenases and it is an obligatory factor in proton transport by uncoupling proteins (UCPs), thus regulating the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores [8]. Other functions of CoQ10 in the cell membrane include stabilization of calcium-dependent channels, metabolic regulation, cell signaling, and cell growth through local regulation of cytosolic redox intermediates such as dihydronicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) [6].
CoQ10, in its reduced form, has been shown to inhibit the peroxidation of cell membrane lipids and to reduce the oxidation of circulating lipids. Interestingly, in vitro, it inhibits the oxidation of low-density lipoprotein more than other antioxidant molecules, such as α-tocopherol or β-carotene [9,10].
CoQ10 is mostly synthetized in the cell, although the pathway involved is not yet completely known. A biosynthetic complex for producing CoQ10, containing proteins, lipids, and polar small molecules (but with specific composition unknown), was recently revealed in yeast and mammals. In particular, multiple mitochondrial uncharacterized proteins (MXPs) have been linked to CoQ10 biosynthesis and recent progress was made also toward understanding the biochemistry of a dehydrogenase, a deaminase, a lipid-binding protein, and a protein kinase-like enzyme in the CoQ10 pathway [11]. In mammalians, 4-hydroxybenzoate is the precursor of the quinone ring, derived from tyrosine, while the isoprenoid tail is derived from the mevalonate pathway, using the common way with cholesterol biosynthesis. The final step, rate limiting, occurs in the mitochondrial matrix [12,13].
On the other hand, CoQ10 can be derived from the diet; in particular, fatty fish (salmon, sardin, and tuna), soya, spinach, and nuts contain high levels of this cofactor. However, the intake from the diet is significant only in deficiency conditions [14]. Some factors may reduce plasma concentrations of CoQ10, such as aging, genetic factors, drugs (e.g., statins), certain diseases (e.g., cardiovascular disease and degenerative muscle disorders), and increased demand [15].
Therefore, it is not surprising that its depletion is associated with a greater propensity to develop immune inflammatory responses through the activation of inflammatory processes such as the nuclear factor-kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cell’s (NF-κB) gene expression [16]. Worthy to note, CoQ10 is endowed with potent antioxidant action able to prevent free radical damage by the regulation of transcriptional pathways in addition to deactivation of inflammatory pathways [17]. Therefore, supplementation with CoQ10 could be efficient in the prevention and/or treatment of a number of pathogenic disorders in relation to the significant reduction of inflammatory markers [18].
Due to its important place in organisms’ functioning, there are many diseases and degenerative states associated with CoQ10′s deficiency, such as cardiovascular disease, muscular dystrophy, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and others [7]. However, if on the one hand clinical evidences in the cardiovascular field have demonstrated the potential role of CoQ10, data concerning the supplementation of this nutraceutical in neurodegenerative diseases and other conditions such as cancer or muscular dystrophy are often old and still conflicting and need additional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [19,20,21].
This review aims to sum up the current possibilities to use CoQ10 as an adjuvant in cardiovascular disease-affected patients, in cardiovascular disease risk factors, and in statin-intolerant ones, with an analysis of its impact on patients’ health and quality of life.

2. Methods

A systematic search strategy was conducted for this review in order to identify trials in both the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, MD, USA; January 1970 to March 2020). The terms “coenzyme Q10”, “dietary supplement”, “ubiquinol”, “ubiquinone”, “clinical trial”, and “human” were incorporated in an electronic search strategy. Overall, we screened 5278 abstracts. The selected references were then further screened for application on cardiovascular diseases or cardiovascular disease risk factors. After a general introduction with an overview on the pharmacodynamic profile of CoQ10, for each potential therapeutic indication, a short description of the mechanism of action has been reported, followed by the clinically observed effects and the most relevant tolerability notes. The authors of the writing and reviewing panels completed Declaration of Interest forms where real or potential sources of conflicts of interest might be perceived.

3. Results

This review will focus our attention on the main potential evidence-based use of CoQ10 supplements in the management of some main cardiovascular disease risk factors and of cardiovascular disease-affected patients and in statin-intolerant ones (Figure 2).

3.1. CoQ10 and Cardiovascular Risk Factors

As stated above, CoQ10 supplementation could find a role in the management of some highly prevalent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease risk factors, such as high blood pressure, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, migraine, and chronic kidney disease.

3.1.1. High Blood Pressure

Hypertension is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, involving one in four men and one in five women, totalling 1.13 billion adults, who had raised blood pressure in 2015 [22]. A recent comparative assessment of the risk of health loss related to systolic blood pressure (SBP), based on 844 studies in 154 countries (published between 1980 and 2015) and 8.69 million participants, has estimated approximately 874 million of people in the world with SBP above 140 mmHg [23]. In 2025, it is estimated that there will be approximately 1.56 billion hypertensive adults [24].
CoQ10 seems to exert a direct effect on the endothelium, provoking vasodilation and lowering blood pressure [25,26]. This effect is linked to its ability to improve nitric oxides bioavailability and to induce vasodilatation especially in patients with hypertension. In addition, CoQ10 adjusts the angiotensin effect in sodium retention and decreases the level of aldosterone [27,28]. Despite exciting blood pressure results observed in preliminary trials (systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduced respectively by 6 and 5 mmHg vs. placebo) [29] and the positive results confirmed by old meta-analyses of RCTs [30,31], a recent meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials including 684 subjects showed that CoQ10 supplementation significantly decreased systolic blood pressure (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) −0.30; 95%CI −0.52, −0.08), but not diastolic blood pressure (SMD −0.08; 95%CI −0.46, 0.29) [32]. However, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, when the blood pressure is on target, the supplementation of CoQ10 did not modify the blood pressure [33,34,35]. In conclusion, despite some promising evidence, the antihypertensive effect of CoQ10 is still unclear in patients with primary hypertension [36,37].

3.1.2. Insulin-Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes

Mitochondria seem to play a key role in the development of insulin resistance. They are well known to convert nutrients from diet such as fats and sugars into ATP; however, ATP production can generate harmful intermediates such as ROS and the increase in the amount of oxidant agents produced in mitochondria has been linked to the increase of insulin resistance [38,39]. Several studies in vitro and in vivo as well [40] found that the concentrations of CoQ10 were lower in mitochondria from insulin-resistant fat and muscle tissue, probably for a change in expression of mevalonate/CoQ10 pathway proteins and thus altered CoQ10 metabolism, suggesting a direct correlation between the low levels of CoQ10 and the high levels of oxidants in the mitochondria. In addition, the administration of CoQ10 in deficient and insulin resistant mice has been shown to improve the insulin sensitivity by reducing ROS levels [40].
In patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS), a condition typically caused by insulin-resistance and strongly associated with the risk to developing cardiovascular disease, the intake of 100 mg/day of CoQ10 for 8 weeks significantly improved Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), Homeostatic Model Assessment of β-cell Function (HOMA-B), serum insulin levels, and plasma total antioxidant capacity [41]. The effect of CoQ10 on insulin-resistance seems to not be related to its effect on body fat. In fact, a recent meta-analysis of RCTs showed that CoQ10 had no significant impact on body weight (p = 0.64) and body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.86), independent from the CoQ10 tested dosage and trial duration [42].
Another highly prevalent cardiovascular risk factor related to insulin-resistance is nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [43]. Despite the numerous mechanisms investigated, the exact biological one related to increased hepatic inflammation and fat accumulation in NAFLD remains largely unknown [44,45]. However, recent studies have focused attention on the role of mitochondrial protein mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) that protects against liver disease. In fact, reduced Mfn2 expression was detected in liver biopsies from patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [46]. The loss of Mfn2 seems to impair mitochondrial respiration and to reduce ATP production, and this defective oxidative phosphorylation process seems to unexpectedly originate from a depletion of the mitochondrial CoQ10 pool [47].
To date, the treatment of NAFLD is essentially based on lifestyle optimization because there are currently no specific drugs approved on the market for this condition. At the same time, few nutraceuticals have been adequately studied for their effects on NAFLD [48]. Among these, CoQ10 is a well-known anti-adipogenic molecule and thus could have a positive impact on NAFLD, even if its exact mechanism is still unclear. It is possible that CoQ10 downregulates the expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS), sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c), and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), which are related to lipid synthesis, and increases in the expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT-1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α (PPARα) associated with fatty acid oxidation [49]. In addition, CoQ10 could change the response to inflammation through nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB)-dependent gene expression [50]; thus, its deficiency might have a role in increasing levels of inflammatory molecules like NF-kB [51].
CoQ10 could serve as an adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator and could regulate the hepatic lipid metabolism to inhibit the abnormal accumulation of hepatic lipids as well as to prevent NAFLD progression [49]. Finally, CoQ10 was also found to bind and activate both PPARs alpha and gamma, suggesting a key role in relaying the states of mitochondria and peroxisomes [52]. At the same time, the experiments performed with peroxisomal inducers indicate that nuclear receptors are involved in the regulation of CoQ10 biosynthesis [13].
In an RCT, 41 subjects with NAFLD were randomly divided into 2 groups to receive CoQ10 (100 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. At the end of the study, the active group benefited from a significant decrease in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), tumor necrosis factor α, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and NAFLD grade compared to placebo (p < 0.05 for all). In addition, patients who received the CoQ10 supplement had higher serum levels of adiponectin (p = 0.016) even if serum leptin levels reduced marginally (p = 0.053) [53]. However, CoQ10 administration (300 mg/day for 12 weeks) in patients with coronary artery disease did not find any significant effect on serum adiponectin levels [54], confirming previous data obtained by Gokbel et al. with the supplementation of CoQ10 100 mg/day in healthy volunteers [55]. In another RCT, the same dose of CoQ10 in 44 NAFLD patients for 4 weeks was associated with significantly decreased waist circumference (WC), serum AST, and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) concentration (p < 0.05 for all) [56].
CoQ10 could also improve the atherogenic dyslipidemia typically associated with NAFLD (reducing triglycerides (TG) and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as well as reduce oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels and arterial pressure with a very high safety profile and without any risk of drug interactions [15]. In conclusion, the studies conducted to date emphasize a potential for CoQ10 therapy in improving several anthropometric and biochemical variables in NAFLD.
A further disease typically characterized by insulin resistance is polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In these women, as showed by the study of Samimi et al., the supplementation with CoQ10 (100 mg/day) for 12 weeks could have beneficial effects on glucose metabolism and on serum total- and LDL-cholesterol levels [57]. Afterwards, the same research group carried out another RCT on 40 women with a diagnosis of PCOS, observing that a supplementation for 12 weeks with CoQ10 (100 mg/day), beside the positive effects on lipid and glucose levels, was responsible for a downregulation of gene expression of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor 1 (p < 0.001) and an upregulated gene expression of PPAR-γ (p = 0.01) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In addition, compared to the placebo group, CoQ10 supplementation downregulated gene expression of interleukin-1 (IL-1) (p = 0.03), IL-8 (p = 0.001), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (p < 0.001) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of subjects with PCOS [58]. Similar results were obtained by Izadi et al. in a RCT of 85 PCO women treated with CoQ10 and/or vitamin E or placebo. In particular, CoQ10 alone improved the sex homone profile, specially either reduced testosterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, and improved insulin resistence. Moreover, it is noteworthy that CoQ10 in coadministration with alfa-tocopherol presented a more pronunced effect and stimulated the release of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), justifing the enhancement of insulin tolerance, since an insulin resistance condition is associated with a reduced synthesis of SHBG at the hepatic level. Then, CoQ10 might promote steroid hormone biosynthesis and normal reproductive function (among which are oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryonic development) through the improvement of mitochondrial functionality [59]. However, new, larger RCTs are needed to confirm the results obatined by Izadi et al.
The extreme consequence of insulin-resistance is Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). A deficiency of CoQ10 plasma levels in patients with T2DM can be observed compared to healthy people [60,61]. In particular, the ubiquinone–ubiquinol ratio, a validated marker of oxidative stress [62], is much higher in a patient with T2DM after breakfast and throughout the day, which suggests heightened oxidative stress in the background of postprandial hyperglycemia [63]. In a recent pooled analysis of 14 trials including 693 overweight diabetic patients, CoQ10 interventions significantly reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (−0.59 mmol/L; 95%CI −1.05 to −0.12; p = 0.01), HbA1c (−0.28%; 95%CI −0.53 to −0.03; p = 0.03), and TG levels (0.17 mmol/L; 95%CI −0.32 to −0.03; p = 0.02). Even in the subgroup analysis, the low-dose consumption of CoQ10 (<200 mg/d) effectively reduced the values of FBG, HbA1c, fasting blood insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and TG with high tolerability profile [64]. In a rat model, the administration of metformin combined with CoQ10 showed a better renoprotective effect than CoQ10 or metformin alone [65]. This is also confirmed for other oral antidiabetic drugs like sitagliptin [66]. This brings up an important point that CoQ10 may potentiate the protective effects of some conventional treatments, but it is yet to be demonstrated in humans.

3.1.3. Dyslipidemias

Several mechanisms have been proposed by which CoQ10 supplements could improve metabolic profiles which probably might be through the induction of gene expression of PPAR-γ [67], a nuclear receptor protein that regulates gene expression involved in insulin and lipid metabolism, differentiation, proliferation, survival, and inflammation [68]. In human endothelial cells, the exposure to CoQ10 is associated with downregulation of the lectin-like oxidized LDL receptors, stimulation of the AMPK, and reduction of the ROS-induced endothelial damage [69]. In fact, the main effect of CoQ10 on plasma lipids seems to be the increased LDL resistance to oxidative stress [70], as also demonstrated in healthy adults after acute strenous physical exercise [71].
In an RCT, 101 dyslipidemic subjects without taking any lipid-lowering drugs were administrated 120 mg CoQ10 or placebo daily for 24 weeks. At the end of the study, CoQ10 supplementation mildly reduced TG (p = 0.020) and LDL-C (p = 0.016), increased apolipoprotein (Apo)A-I (p < 0.001) and serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC; p = 0.003), while decreased homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index (p = 0.009) compared to placebo [24]. In the meta-analysis conducted by Sharifi et al. [72], CoQ10 administration to patients with metabolic diseases mildly but significantly reduced TG concentrations (SMD −0.28 mmol/L; 95% CI, −0.56 to −0.005, p = 0.001). A recent meta-analysis including six clinical trials suggests that CoQ10 could mildly reduce the lipoprotein (a) plasma level [73]. Overall, the effect of CoQ10 supplementation on plasma lipid levels is, however, quantitatively small and its clinical relevance has yet to be demonstrated.

3.1.4. Systemic Inflammation

Inflammation is considered a main process involved in atherosclerosis development [74]. A recent meta-analysis of nine RCTs and 509 patients showed that the CoQ10 supplementation in chronic inflammatory diseases (60–500 mg/day for 8–12 weeks) is responsible for the significant reduction in the plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (SMD: −0.44, 95% CI: (−0.81 to −0.07) mg/dl; I2 = 66.1%, p < 0.01) and in IL-6 levels (SMD: −0.37, 95% CI: (−0.65 to −0.09), p = 0.01) [75]. Similar results were obtained by the metanalysis of Fan et al. that demonstrated a reduction of the C-reactive protein levels in addition to the abovementioned parameters in patients afflicted by inflammatory diseases [76]; in elderly people with low CoQ10 levels; and in patients with metabolic diseases characterized by chronic, low grade inflammation [17]. However, the results are conflicting while not so evident in patients affected by metabolic syndrome [41] and dyslipidemia [29].

3.2. CoQ10 and Cardiovascular Disease

CoQ10 supplementation has been tested in a number of overt cardiovascular diseases, with the aim to evaluate its impact on self-perceived quality of life, instrumental parameters, and sometimes clinical outcomes as well.

3.2.1. CoQ10 and Heart Failure (HF)

HF is defined by the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) guidelines as “a complex clinical syndrome that can result from any structural or functional cardiac disorder that impairs the ability of the ventricle to fill or eject blood” [77,78]. It affects 23 million people worldwide [79], and the HF prevalence in the USA is 5 million people [80]. At the same time, this disease is also the main component for disability and hospitalization in the elderly and it is the cause of one in nine deaths in the USA [1]. In Europe, the prevalence and incidence of HF and the related costs are quite similar [81,82]. Despite that, in the last decades, the prevention and treatment of HF have improved significantly, quality of life is often impaired, and mortality rates are greater than 10% per year, reaching 20%–50% in more serious patients [83]. In the last years, a number of clinical studies have investigated the possibility that CoQ10 can contribute to the prevention of incident HF and to the improvement of related symptoms and instrumental parameters. Being an essential cofactor of the mitochondrial respiratory chain used for production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), it is not surprising that the highest concentration compared to other tissues is focused on myocardium mitochondria [84].
A relative tissue CoQ10 deficiency could then play an etiopathogenic role in the development and progression of HF: some evidence suggests that the depletion of CoQ10 is proportional to the reduction of CoQ10 myocardial tissue concentrations and to the severity of the disease developed [85,86,87]. In fact, the lowest levels of myocardial CoQ10 have been observed in patients of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV compared to patients of NYHA class I [88,89]. Of course, one of the most important studies in the field of nutraceuticals, the Q-SYMBIO multicentre, randomized placebo-controlled trial, was used to assess the impact of the daily intake of CoQ10 on total mortality and not just on the surrogate endpoints. Patients with moderate or severe HF currently treated with the pharmacological gold standard treatments (420 patients) were randomized to a daily intake of 300 mg of CoQ10 (n = 202) or placebo (n = 218). After two years, a significant reduction in Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) rate (15% in the CoQ10 group vs. 26% in the placebo group, HR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.32 to 0.80; p = 0.003), CV mortality (9% vs. 16%, p = 0.026), all-cause mortality (10% vs. 18%, p = 0.018), and incidence of hospital stays for HF (p = 0.033) were registered in CoQ10-treated patients vs. the placebo treated ones [90]. This result was confirmed in a subsequent meta-analysis of 14 RCTs including 2149 patients. It has shown that administration of CoQ10 reduces mortality (RR= 0.69; 95%CI: 0.50–0.95; p = 0.02; I2= 0%) and improves exercise capacity (SMD = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.02–0.30; p = 0.04; I2= 54%) compared to the placebo. However, no significant difference was observed in the endpoints of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between “active group” and placebo (SMD = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.02–1.12; p = 0.04; I2 = 75%) [91]. The effect on LVEF could be more relevant in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF) [92] (net change: 4.8% vs. subjects with EF < 30%) and patients untreated with statins and/or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) (+6.7%) compared to the subgroup of patients treated with these drugs (+1.2%) [93]. One of the possible explanations of the heterogeneity in results on EF may be the diversity of CoQ10 supplemented through different pharmaceutical forms and dosages. In fact, plasma concentrations of this molecule are extremely variable in relation to pharmaceutical form and administered dosages but were reported in few RCTs [94,95,96]. In addition, the diversity of HF grade of patients enrolled (NYHA I-II-III-IV), duration of treatments, and cotreatment with conventional therapies might be other factors that could explain the heterogeneity of results about EF [97].

3.2.2. CoQ10 and Myocardial Infarction

HF could be related to different causes: one of the most frequent is ischemic damage. As highlighted before, treatment with CoQ10 in HF could prevent myocardial cell damage and could restore tissue CoQ10 deficiency, especially in myocardial tissue, with the final result being significant improvement in HF [98,99,100,101]. The degree of deficiency of this molecule has also been found to correlate directly with the degree of impairment in left ventricular function [102]. For these reasons, another possible indication of CoQ10 supplementation is acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In fact, CoQ10 is an ATP-sparing agent and regenerable antioxidant capable of protecting cell structures from oxidative damage during ischemia and reperfusion injury [103,104].
AMI is typically characterized by complications such as left ventricular dysfunction related to necrosis and loss of functioning myocardium and consequently by pathological remodelling, which seem to be related to reperfusion-induced free radical damage, lipid peroxidation, and decreased energy production and thus the lack of CoQ10 [105,106,107,108]. Cardiac remodelling may be defined as “a group of molecular, cellular, and interstitial alterations that manifest clinically as changes in size, mass, geometry, and function of the heart after injury” [105]. These structural changes in ventricular remodelling in conjunction to tissue CoQ10 deficiency may result in poor prognosis for its negative association with HF, which is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with AMI [109]. Oxidative stress may be important in the pathogenesis of remodelling which may begin via subcellular remodelling leading to HF [110]. Therefore, any agent which can prevent remodelling in patients with AMI would be an important therapeutic aid for prevention of complications altering AMI [111,112]. In a recent RCT of 55 patients with LVEF < 50% after AMI, the effects of CoQ10 (120 mg/day) or placebo were studied for 24 weeks. The results revealed that wall thickness opposite the site of infarction decreased from 12.2 ± 2.0 mm to 10.0 ± 1.8 mm with CoQ10 compared with 12.8 ± 2.2 mm to 13.3 ± 2.3 mm with the placebo (p < 0.01). Left ventricular mass changed from 236 ± 72 g to 213 ± 61 g with CoQ10 compared with 230 ± 77 g to 255 ± 86 g with placebo (p < 0.01). In addition, treatment with CoQ10 also prevented alteration of the sphericity index (from 1.61 ± 0.28 to 1.63 ± 0.30 with CoQ10 compared with 1.61 ± 0.32 to 1.41 ± 0.31 with placebo (p < 0.05)) and alteration of the wall thickening abnormality at the infarct site (from 9.4 ± 3.0 cm2 to 9.1 ± 2.8 cm2 compared with 10.1 ± 3.1 to 13.7 ± 4.2 cm2 with placebo (p < 0.05)). Finally, end diastolic and systolic volumes and serum ACE also showed significant reduction with CoQ10 compared to the control group [107]. The findings suggest that CoQ10 administered early after AMI may be protective against left ventricular remodelling in patients with persistent left ventricular dysfunction. However, long-term RCTs are needed to confirm preliminary data.

3.2.3. CoQ10 and Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered a frequent atrial arrhythmia in patients diagnosed with HF or ischemic heart disease, and its prevalence has been growing worldwide in the last years. It is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality [113,114,115]. As underlined for HF, CoQ10 plays an important role in the production of ATP and its bioenergetic function associated to with antioxidant and scavenge ROS function which is essential for proper heart functioning [116,117]. A meta-analysis of eight RCTs found that patients treated with CoQ10 were significantly less likely to develop ventricular arrhythmias (OR (95% CI) 0.05 (0.01–0.31)) and to require inotropic drugs after surgery (OR 95% CI 0.47 (0.27–0.81)). Twelve patients (22.2%) in the control group and three patients (6.3%) in the CoQ10 group had episodes of AF after 12 months of treatment (p = 0.02). [118] Similar results were obtained by other authors, concluding that CoQ10 as adjuvant treatment in patients with HF may attenuate the incidence of AF. The exact mechanisms of the effect are still unclear, even if one of the possible explanations could be attributed to the reduction of serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) [119].

3.2.4. CoQ10 and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies are a number of debilitating conditions responsible for poor quality of life and high risk of mortality. Both in vitro and animal studies suggest a link between cardiomyopathies and oxidative stress [120]. CoQ10 deficiency appears to be frequent in people with dilated cardiomyopathy, and its supplementation may be able to restore plasmatic and myocardial levels [121]. However, new studies are needed to confirm this evidence.
In children with dilated cardiomyopathy, CoQ10 may improve the cardiothoracic ratio and shorten ventricular depolarization and NYHA class [122]. In a prospective RCT (duration 6 months) in children with dilated cardiomyopathy, the administration of CoQ10 resulted in a lower mean score for the index of cardiac failure (p < 0.024 compared to placebo) and in improvement of diastolic function (p < 0.011 compared to placebo) [123]. In subjects with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treated with an average of 200 mg/day of CoQ10, a significant improvement in symptoms of fatigue and dyspnoea with no side effects was noted. In addition, the mean interventricular septal thickness (from 1.51 ± 0.17 cm to 1.14 ± 0.13 cm, a 24% reduction, p < 0.002) and mean posterior wall thickness improved significantly (from 1.37 ± 0.13 cm to 1.01 ± 0.15 cm, a 26% reduction, p < 0.005) [124]. There is also a significant improvement in quality of life (on a 6-min walk test) and NYHA class (≥1) [125].
In the last years, many studies have focused on the role of CoQ10 in iatrogenic cardiomiopathies induced by some drugs like anthracycline antibiotics used in the chemotherapy of hematological cancers as leukemias and lymphomas and in solid malignancies such as carcinomas and sarcomas [126]. Doxorubicin is used for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, and it is known to improve overall survival. However, side effects such as cardiomyopathy and HF can occur in some patients, probably also for a raised ROS generation. Today, there is data indicating that CoQ10 did not have any influence on doxorubicin cell toxicity, thus making further studies urgent [127]. Nevertheless, the administration of CoQ10 and L-carnitine in combination showed protection against oxidative stress by reducing levels of malondialdehyde and nitric oxide if started within 5 days before doxorubicin use. In addition, it also improved heart functions and decreased IL-1 and TNF-α Troponin-l and Troponin-T levels [128].

3.2.5. CoQ10 and Ischemic Stroke

In the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke, some factors such as inflammation, excitotoxicity, and oxidative stress were demonstrated to play a pivotal role [129,130]. A recent study demonstrated the decrement of CoQ10 in the acute phase of ischemic stroke and also the significant negative correlation between serum CoQ10 levels and the scores of the NIHSS and MRS (respectively National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Modified Ranking Scale) [131]. Ischemia/Reperfusion (I/R) injury may induce oxidative stress and low levels of protective antioxidants such as CoQ10 in the brain. In particular, it seems that a decrease of CoQ10 induced by I/R overcomes the aging process [132]. In vivo studies (with symptomatic vasospasm model) have reported that pretreatment with CoQ10 reduces the incidence of ischemic lesions and can alleviate the pathological outcomes following a stroke incidence [133].
In the last years, the relation between CoQ10 and inflammation and oxidative stress has been reported in cell and animal models. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), MDA, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity are important biomarkers in oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory processes after stroke, and they can predict functional outcomes [134,135,136]. In a short RCT, 60 patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomly assigned to a placebo or CoQ10-supplemented group (300 mg/day) for 4 weeks. At the end of treatment, CoQ10 supplementation improved NIHSS and MMSE scores significantly (p = 0.05, p = 0.03 respectively) even if there were no significant differences in MRS score, SOD, MDA, and GFAP levels between the two groups. These results could be partially explained by the low dose and short duration of supplementation [137].

3.3. Special Conditions

CoQ10 supplementation has been tested also in a number of “special conditions”, with the aim to evaluate its impact on self-perceived quality of life, instrumental parameters, and sometimes clinical outcomes as well.

3.3.1. Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased prevalence of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events and hospitalization, and diabetic nephropathy, all regardless of existing risk factors and a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [138,139]. Increased biomarkers of oxidative stress in these patients have been identified as a major contributor to the pathogenesis of CKD and related CVD [140,141]. Circulating concentrations of CoQ10 have been decreased in patients with CKD, suggesting that CoQ10 supplementation may be a potentially useful antioxidant supplement for these patients [142]. Nevertheless, the relation between CoQ10 and oxidative stress in patients with CKD is still controversial.
A meta-analysis of seven RCTs demonstrated that CoQ10 supplementation to patients with CKD significantly reduced total cholesterol (TC) (SMD = −0.58; CI, −0.94, −0.21; p = 0.002), LDL-C (SMD = −0.47; 95% CI, −0.78, −0.17; p = 0.003), malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD = −3.0; 95% CI, −5.10, −0.90; p = 0.005), and creatinine levels (SMD = −1.65; 95% CI, −2.75, −0.54; p = 0.003) yet did not affect fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and C reactive protein (CRP) concentrations [143]. Moreover, in a study not included in the previously cited meta-analysis, CoQ10 supplementation at a dosage of 100 mg/day for 12 weeks had positive effects on insulin metabolism and MDA levels among diabetic nephropathy patients yet fasting glucose remained unchanged [144]. Finally, a recent meta-analysis of 4 RCTs and 4 experimental studies of diabetic people revealed that CoQ10 combined with antidiabetic drugs show statistical differences in FPG (SMD = −2.04, 95% CI = −3.90 to −0.18, p < 0.05), TC (Std. MD = −1.73, 95% CI = −3.41 to −0.05, p < 0.05), HDL-C (Std. MD = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01–0.18, p < 0.05), TG (Std. MD = −0.39, 95% CI = −0.71 to −0.07, p < 0.05), and MDA (Std. MD = −1.29, 95% CI = −2.32 to −0.26, p < 0.05) amelioration after diabetic kidney disease therapy compared to the control group [145].
CoQ10 supplementation for diabetic hemodialysis patients for 12 weeks did not influence lipid profiles [70,146,147]. In hemodialysis patients, 100 mg/day of CoQ10 for 3 months could significantly reduce CRP levels (95%CI = −20.1 to −10.5, p < 0.001) [148], while daily supplementation with 1200 mg of CoQ10 significantly improved biomarkers of oxidative stress [149].
Finally, the supplementation of CoQ10 could have a positive impact in people with nephrotic syndrome caused also by a subgroup of mitochondrial diseases classified as primary CoQ10 deficiency (pathogenic variants in at least one of 10 genes termed COQ1 through COQ10). In contrast to other mitochondrial disorders, some patients with primary CoQ10 deficiency show significant improvements after CoQ10 supplementation, making early diagnosis and treatment essential in the management of these people [150].

3.3.2. Migraine

Migraine is an emerging risk factor for both coronary and cerebrovascular diseases [151], for which the pathophysiology has not yet been fully understood. Among other factors, a deficiency of CoQ10 is associated with the pathogenesis of migraine, specially in pediatric and adolescent populations [152].
A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis has been performed evaluating four RCTs including 221 subjects. CoQ10 significantly reduced the frequency of migraine attack (p < 0.001); however, no significant effect on severity and duration has been observed (p = 0.105 and p = 0.086, respectively) [153]. A more recent, larger meta-analysis of three RCTs and two observational studies, including 346 patients (120 pediatric and 226 adult subjects), has been carried out. In particular, with a daily dosage of CoQ10 of 100 or 400 mg, the forest plot analysis confirmed a significant reduction of the duration of migraine attack/month (p < 0.00001) and of the migraine day/month (p = 0.009) if compared with placebo. Nevertheless, frequency and severity of attacks (p = 0.08) were not changed [154].
Based on this data, the American Academy of Neurology guidelines suggest a possible role of CoQ10 in migraine prevention, with a high safety profile in pediatric and adult populations [155].
In one double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial on 45 patients (22 treated with placebo and 23 treated with CoQ10 at a dose of 400 mg/day for 3 months), a significant prophilactic effect of the supplementation on migraine attacks was reported, resulting in less severe, shorter, and less frequent attacks. Interestingly, an increase in serum levels of CoQ10 and a reduction of TNFα and calcitonin gene-related peptide (GCPR) levels have also been observed, suggesting a role of CoQ10 as mitigation of inflammatory processes [156]. According to other studies [43,157], however, no significant differences in serum IL6 and IL10 have been observed compared with the control groups [83].
Interesting results emerge by co-supplementation of CoQ10 (100 mg/day) with other nutraceuticals, such as curcumin, magnesium, and Tanacetum parthenium L. and riboflavin. In particular, Gaul and collaborators observed on 173 adults affected by migraine that a fixed combination of magnesium (600 mg/day), riboflavin (400 mg/day), and CoQ10 (150 mg/day) after 3 months of treatment reduced migraine pain without any serious adverse events [158]. Moreover, preliminary but encouraging results in the prophylaxis of migraine have been observed in a recent RCT, where the assumption of soft gelatin capsules containing nano-micellar curcumin (80 mg/day) and CoQ10 (300 mg/day) determined a significant reduction of frequency, severity, and duration of migraine attacks (all p < 0.001) [159].

3.3.3. Pre-Eclampsia

Pre-eclampsia is a severe vascular complication of pregnancy. A growing collection of literature suggests that attention needs to be focused on the possible effect of CoQ10 during pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders [160].
Pre-eclampsia consists of the gradual development of hypertension, with values of SBP >140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 90 mmHg. However, in some cases, there is worsening of preexisting hypertension, generalized edema, proteinuria (300 mg/L or more in 24 h), and sometimes blood clotting disorders that arise after 20 weeks of gestation [161]. Oxidative stress could be one of the causing factors of this dangerous condition [162]. From one side, pregnant women with established pre-eclampsia have significantly lower plasma levels of CoQ10 compared to healthy pregnant women [163,164]. A single trial in which CoQ10 has been assumed at the dose of 200 mg/day for 20 weeks until delivery concluded with a reduction of the risk of developing pre-eclampsia in women at risk for the condition (p = 0.035) [165]. However, a recent meta-analysis of twenty-nine RCTs highlighted that the antioxidant strategy, both by using of CoQ10 and by using of other agents (vitamins, resveratrol, or/and arginine), did not exert significant beneficial effects on maternal and fetal outcomes [166]. Further research is needed in this field.

3.3.4. CoQ10 and Statin-Intolerance

Statin-associated myopathy pathogenetic mechanisms are still not fully understood. The most probable hypotheses are related to the increased intracellular lipid production and lipid myopathy, decreased sarcolemmal cholesterol, and reduction in small guanosine triphosphate-binding proteins and in mitochondrial CoQ10 [167]. Statins, the milestone in lipid-lowering treatment, inhibit hydroxyl-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, a rate limiting enzyme not only in cholesterol synthesis but also in the synthesis of farnesyl pyrophosphate that is essential for CoQ10 biosynthesis, thus explaining the link between statin use and CoQ10 deficiency [168]. In fact, a recent meta-analysis of 12 RCTs involving 1776 participants concluded that, compared to the placebo, statin treatment resulted in a reduction of circulating CoQ10 (SMD −2.12; 95% CI −3.40 to −0.84; p = 0.001) independently from statin solution, intensity, and treatment time [169].
No study has yet been designed to demonstrate that CoQ10 supplementation could prevent statin-related myalgia. However, a meta-analysis of 12 RCTs involving 575 patients concluded that, compared to the placebo, CoQ10 supplementation ameliorated statin-associated muscle symptoms, such as muscle pain (weighted mean difference (WMD) −1.60; 95% CI −1.75 to −1.44; p < 0.001), muscle weakness (WMD −2.28; 95%CI −2.79 to −1.77; p = 0.006), muscle cramping (WMD −1.78; 95% CI −2.31 to −1.24; p < 0.001), and muscle tiredness (WMD −1.75; 95% CI −2.31 to −1.19; p < 0.001), whereas no reduction in plasma creatine kinase levels was observed after CoQ10 supplementation (WMD 0.09; 95% CI −0.06 to 0.24; p = 0.23) [170]. These positive effects are usually achieved only with high dosages of CoQ10 (≥200 mg/day).
However, CoQ10 could have a positive impact on the management of patients more likely to develop statin-related side effects. In fact, it has been clinically proven that CoQ10 supplementation could be able to improve self-perceived fatigue in healthy subjects, [171] in obese patients [172], and in patients affected by fibromyalgia [173,174] even if larger RCTs are needed to confirm this preliminary data.

4. Discussion

Theoretically, CoQ10 is an ideal dietary supplement. It is contained in some foods, its dosage in blood is feasible, and its deficiency is associated with some diseases, while its supplementation tends to restore a physiological condition (Table 2). Moreover, the supplementation with CoQ10 is safe, even with chronic exposure to 900 mg/day [175] and in frail patients, like elderly and CKD patients, without any known pharmacological interactions [3].
The results derived from clinical trials testing the efficacy of CoQ10 supplementation in different settings are often contrasting and complicate the process of making definitive conclusion on its efficacy in a number of conditions. This is due to a series of causes: the studies are often underpowered, the duration is too short to test the effects on hard outcomes, the methodology applied is sometime of low quality with a scarce standardization of patients characteristics at the baseline, the tested dosage is not titrated based on the blood CoQ10 level, and there is usually no quantification of CoQ10 intake with diet (even if this is usually very low). However, one of the most important problems about CoQ10 is related to its poor oral bioavailability. In fact, most of the CoQ10 integrated is eliminated through the faeces and only a fraction of that supplement reaches the blood and thus the tissues and organs [176]. CoQ10 is a molecule with relatively high molecular weight (MW = 863) and is insoluble in water. Because of these reasons, it is poorly absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract, and the key to effective supplementation is therefore the improvement of its bioavailability [177]. Intestinal absorption of CoQ10 occurs firstly through the emulsification and formation of “mixed micelles” with fatty meal constituents, also facilitated by bile and pancreatic secretions in the small intestine. It is therefore important to stress that the assumption of CoQ10 in fed state can significantly improve its absorption [178]. The absorption efficiency is well known to be dose dependent and occurs through a “simple passive facilitated diffusion” process: “passive” because it does not require the use of energy and “facilitated” because the intestinal transport is made possible by a lipid carrier, which is usually a monoglyceride fat [179]. In the enterocytes, CoQ10 is incorporated into chylomicrons and subsequently reaches the bloodstream through the lymphatic system (Figure 3). The results of pharmacokinetic studies conducted using deuterium-labeled CoQ10 [180] demonstrated slow absorption in the gastrointestinal tract (Tmax ≈ 6 h) with a second plasma peak observed approximately 24 h after the oral intake [179]. This second peak could be attributed to both enterohepatic recirculation and hepatic redistribution of the circulation, mainly through the LDL/VLDL fractions [178].
To date, various formulations and dosages of CoQ10 are present on the market, such as tablets, chewable tablets, capsules, and gels containing oily suspensions. However, the oral bioavailability of this supplement is extremely variable in relation to many aspects. For example, the type of formulation and the release method, the dosage of CoQ10, and the mode of administration (e.g., with or without water and before or after meals) are biopharmaceutical factors that may affect bioavailability, as highlighted before [181]. Regarding the molecule, the ubiquinol form is the most available compared to ubiquinone, in particular if supplemented in fed state and conveyed through specific strategies like the use of liposomes, nano-emulsions nanostructured lipid carriers, and micelles [182,183]. The reduction of particle size (including the use of nanoparticles), the use of oily suspensions, and the solubilization and increase of solubility in water are also viable strategies [184]. In particular, the CoQ10 and β-cyclodextrin complex has been developed in addition to the intention of improving solubility in water to implement the technological properties and stability of CoQ10 [185], permitting the preparation of aqueous formulations, such as syrups. The improvement of bioavailability with CoQ10 + β-cyclodextrins and with ubiquinol have already been demonstrated in humans [186,187,188], with satisfactory results. Table 3 summarizes the main biopharmaceutical strategies used to increase the bioavailability of CoQ10.
Even though these formulations allow an important increase of bioavailability, it is important to underline that most of the orally supplemented CoQ10 is eliminated via faeces [175]. Furthermore, CoQ10 exerts many mild positive effects on different tissues and metabolism. They could individually not be so relevant from a quantitative point of view, but it is really difficult to quantify their impact as a whole on human health. In fact, the long-term contemporary reduction of systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, a mild reduction of blood pressure, and insulin-resistance could have positive impacts on cardiovascular disease risk.

5. Conclusions

Clinical evidence supports supplementation with high doses of bioavailable-CoQ10 (≥200 mg/day) to support heart health in patients affected by coronary heart disease and heart failure, partly modulating a number of risk factors for these conditions, and partly directly acting on myocardial cell metabolism. Long-term RCTs are still needed to confirm and better understand the efficacy and safety profile of this molecule in a large number of patients and CV diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.G.C. and A.C.; literature search and revision, A.M., L.T., and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M., L.T., and A.C.; writing—review and editing, A.F.G.C.; supervision, A.F.G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Cicero, A.F.; Colletti, A. Nutraceuticals and Dietary Supplements to Improve Quality of Life and Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bentinger, M.; Brismar, K.; Dallner, G. The antioxidant role of coenzyme Q. Mitochondrion 2007, 7, S41–S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saini, R. Coenzyme Q10: The essential nutrient. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2011, 3, 466–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Aberg, F.; Appelkvist, E.L.; Dallner, G.; Ernster, L. Distribution and redox state of ubiquinones in rat and human tissues. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1992, 295, 230–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miles, M.V.; Horn, P.S.; Morrison, J.A.; Tang, P.H.; DeGrauw, T.; Pesce, A.J. Plasma coenzyme Q10 reference intervals, but not redox status, are affected by gender and race in self-reported healthy adults. Clin. Chim. Acta 2003, 332, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hernández-Camacho, J.D.; Bernier, M.; López-Lluch, G.; Navas, P. Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation in Aging and Disease. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Garrido-Maraver, J.; Oropesa-Ávila, M.; Cordero, M.D.; Vega, A.F.; de la Mata, M.; Delgado, A.; de Miguel, M.; Calero, C.P.; Villanueva Paz, M.; Cotán, D.; et al. Coenzyme Q10 Therapy. Mol. Syndromol. 2014, 5, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. De Barcelos, I.P.; Haas, R.H. CoQ10 and Aging. Biology 2019, 8, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Littarru, G.P.; Tiano, L. Bioenergetic and antioxidant properties of coenzyme Q10: Recent developments. Mol. Biotechnol. 2007, 37, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malekmohammad, K.; Sewell, R.D.E.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. Antioxidants and Atherosclerosis: Mechanistic Aspects. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Stefely, J.A.; Pagliarini, D.J. Biochemistry of Mitochondrial Coenzyme Q Biosynthesis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 824–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Szkopińska, A. Ubiquinone. Biosynthesis of quinone ring and its isoprenoid side chain. Intracellular localization. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2000, 47, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Turunen, M.; Olsson, J.; Dallner, G. Metabolism and function of coenzyme Q. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1660, 171–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Aberg, F.; Appelkvist, E.L.; Dallner, G.; Ernster, L. Uptake of dietary coenzyme Q supplement is limited in rats. J. Nutr. 1995, 125, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gutierrez-Mariscal, F.M.; Yubero-Serrano, E.M.; Villalba, J.M.; Lopez-Miranda, J. Coenzyme Q10: From bench to clinic in aging diseases, a translational review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 16, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boroujeni, M.B.; Khayat, Z.K.; Anbari, K.; Niapour, A.; Gholami, M.; Gharravi, A.M. Coenzyme Q10 Protects Skeletal Muscle From Ischemia-Reperfusion Through the NF-kappa B Pathway. Perfusion 2017, 32, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhai, J.; Bo, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, L. Effects of Coenzyme Q10 on Markers of Inflammation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mantle, D.; Hargreaves, I. Coenzyme Q10 and Degenerative Disorders Affecting Longevity: An Overview. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Galasko, D.R.; Peskind, E.; Clark, C.M.; Quinn, J.F.; Ringman, J.M.; Jicha, G.A.; Cotman, C.; Cottrell, B.; Montine, T.J.; Thomas, R.G.; et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Antioxidants for Alzheimer disease: A randomized clinical trial with cerebrospinal fluid biomarker measures. Arch. Neurol. 2012, 69, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Müller, T.; Büttner, T.; Gholipour, A.F.; Kuhn, W. Coenzyme Q10 supplementation provides mild symptomatic benefit in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2003, 341, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parkinson Study Group QE3 Investigators. A randomized clinical trial of high-dosage coenzyme Q10 in early Parkinson disease: No evidence of benefit. JAMA Neurol. 2014, 71, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: A pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19.1 million participants. Lancet 2017, 389, 37–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Forouzanfar, M.H.; Liu, P.; Roth, G.A.; Ng, M.; Biryukov, S.; Marczak, L.; Alexander, L.; Estep, K.; Abate, K.A.; Akinyemiju, T.F.; et al. Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990–2015. JAMA 2017, 317, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hednerm, T.; Kjeldsen, S.E.; Narkiewicz, K. State of global health-hypertension burden and control. Blood Press 2012, 21, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Digiesi, V.; Cantini, F.; Oradei, A.; Bisi, G.; Guarino, G.C.; Brocchi, A.; Bellandi, F.; Mancini, M.; Littarru, G.P. Coenzyme Q10 in essential hypertension. Mol. Aspects Med. 1994, 15, s257–s263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ignarro, L.J. Biological actions and properties of endothelium-derived nitric oxide formed and released from artery and vein. Circ. Res. 1989, 65, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Fabre, L.F.; Banks, R.C., Jr.; McIsaac, W.M.; Farrell, G. Effects of ubiquinone and related substances on secretion of aldosterone and cortisol. Am. J. Physiol. 1965, 208, 1275–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Langsjoen, P.; Willis, R.; Folkers, K. Treatment of essential hypertension with coenzyme Q10. Mol. Aspects Med. 1994, 15, S265–S272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, P.; Yang, C.; Guo, H.; Wang, J.; Lin, S.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Ling, W. Treatment of coenzyme Q10 for 24 weeks improves lipid and glycemic profile in dyslipidemic individuals. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2018, 12, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ho, M.J.; Bellusci, A.; Wright, J.M. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of coenzyme Q10 for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009, CD007435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rosenfeldt, F.L.; Haas, S.J.; Krum, H.; Hadj, A.; Leong, J.Y.; Watts, G.F. Coenzyme Q10 in the treatment of hypertension: A meta-analysis of the clinical trials. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2007, 21, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tabrizi, R.; Akbari, M.; Sharifi, N.; Lankarani, K.B.; Kolahdooz, F.; Taghizadeh, M.; Asemi, Z. The Effects of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Blood Pressures Among Patients with Metabolic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. High Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev. 2018, 25, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dai, Y.L.; Luk, T.H.; Yiu, K.H.; Wang, M.; Yip, P.M.C.; Lee, S.W.L.; Li, S.W.; Tam, S.; Fong, B.; Lau, C.P.; et al. Reversal of mitochondrial dysfunction by coenzyme Q10 supplement improves endothelial function in patients with ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: A randomized controlled trial. Atherosclerosis 2011, 216, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lim, S.C.; Lekshminarayanan, R.; Goh, S.K.; Ong, Y.Y.; Subramaniam, T.; Sum, C.F.; Ong, C.N.; Lee, B.L. The effect of coenzyme Q10 on microcirculatory endothelial function of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis 2008, 196, 966–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hamilton, S.J.; Chew, G.T.; Watts, G.F. Coenzyme Q10 improves endothelial dysfunction in statin-treated type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 810–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Borghi, C.; Cicero, A.F.G. Nutraceuticals with a clinically detectable blood pressure-lowering effect: A review of available randomized clinical trials and their meta-analyses. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 83, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Cicero, A.F.G.; Fogacci, F.; Colletti, A. Commentary to: “The Effects of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Blood Pressures Among Patients with Metabolic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”. Hig. Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev. 2018, 25, 51–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Paglialunga, S.; Ludzki, A.; Root-McCaig, J.; Holloway, G.P. In adipose tissue, increased mitochondrial emission of reactive oxygen species is important for short-term high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance in mice. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Anderson, E.J.; Lustig, M.E.; Boyle, K.E.; Woodlief, T.L.; Kane, D.A.; Lin, C.T.; Price, J.W.; Kang, L.; Rabinovitch, P.S.; Szeto, H.H.; et al. Mitochondrial H2O2 emission and cellular redox state link excess fat intake to insulin resistance in both rodents and humans. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fazakerley, D.J.; Chaudhuri, R.; Yang, P.; Maghzal, G.J.; Thomas, K.C.; Krycer, J.R.; Humphrey, S.J.; Parker, B.L.; Fisher-Wellman, K.H.; Meoli, C.C.; et al. Mitochondrial CoQ deficiency is a common driver of mitochondrial oxidants and insulin resistance. ELife 2018, 7, e32111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Raygan, F.; Rezavandi, Z.; Dadkhah Tehrani, S.; Farrokhian, A.; Asemi, Z. The effects of coenzyme Q10 administration on glucose homeostasis parameters, lipid profiles, biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with metabolic syndrome. Eur. J. Nutr. 2016, 55, 2357–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Saboori, S.; Rad, E.Y.; Mardani, M.; Khosroshahi, M.Z.; Nouri, Y.; Falahi, E. Effect of Q10 supplementation on body weight and body mass index: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2019, 13, 1179–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Araújo, A.R.; Rosso, N.; Bedogni, G.; Tiribelli, C.; Bellentani, S. Global epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: What we need in the future. Liver Int. 2018, 38, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Buzzetti, E.; Pinzani, M.; Tsochatzis, E.A. The multiple-hit pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Metabolism 2016, 65, 1038–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, Z.; Tian, R.; She, Z.; Cai, J.; Li, H. Role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hernández-Alvarez, M.I.; Sebastian, D.; Vives, S.; Ivanova, S.; Bartoccioni, P.; Kakimoto, P.; Plana, N.; Veiga, S.R.; Hernández, V.; Vasconcelos, N.; et al. Deficient Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondrial Phosphatidylserine Transfer Causes Liver Disease. Cell 2019, 177, 881–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mourier, A.; Motori, E.; Brandt, T.; Lagouge, M.; Atanassov, I.; Galiner, A.; Rappl, G.; Brodesser, S.; Hultenby, K.; Dieterich, C.; et al. Mitofusin 2 Is Required to Maintain Mitochondrial Coenzyme Q Levels. J. Cell Biol. 2015, 208, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cicero, A.F.G.; Colletti, A.; Bellentani, S. Nutraceutical Approach to Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): The Available Clinical Evidence. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chen, K.; Chen, X.; Xue, H.; Zhang, P.; Fang, W.; Chen, X.; Ling, W. Coenzyme Q10 attenuates high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through activation of the AMPK pathway. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 814–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moazen, M.; Mazloom, Z.; Dabbaghmanesh, M.H.; Ahmadi, A. Effect of CoQ10 supplementation on blood pressure, inflammation, and lipid profile in type 2 diabetics. Iran. J. Nutr. Sci. Food Technol. 2013, 8, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pala, R.; Orhan, C.; Tuzcu, M.; Sahin, N.; Ali, S.; Cinar, V.; Atalay, M.; Sahin, K. Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation Modulates NFκB and Nrf2 Pathways in Exercise Training. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2016, 15, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Tiefenbach, J.; Magomedova, L.; Liu, J.; Reunov, A.A.; Tsai, R.; Eappen, N.S.; Jockusch, R.A.; Nislow, C.; Cummins, C.L.; Krause, H.M. Idebenone and coenzyme Q10 are novel PPARα/γ ligands, with potential for treatment of fatty liver diseases. Dis. Model. Mech. 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Farsi, F.; Mohammadshahi, M.; Alavinejad, P.; Rezazadeh, A.; Zarei, M.; Engali, K.A. Functions of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Liver Enzymes, Markers of Systemic Inflammation, and Adipokines in Patients Affected by Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2016, 35, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lee, B.J.; Tseng, Y.F.; Yen, C.H.; Lin, P.T. Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation (300 mg/day) on antioxidation and anti-inflammation in coronary artery disease patients during statins therapy: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Nutr. J. 2013, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Gokbel, H.; Gergerlioglu, H.S.; Okudan, N.; Belviranli, M. Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on plasma adiponectin, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels in men. J. Med. Food 2010, 13, 216–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Farhangi, M.A.; Alipour, B.; Jafarvand, E.; Khoshbaten, M. Oral coenzyme Q10 supplementation in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Effects on serum vaspin, chemerin, pentraxin 3, insulin resistance and oxidative stress. Arch. Med. Res. 2014, 45, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Samimi, M.; Zarezade Mehrizi, M.; Foroozanfard, F.; Akbari, H.; Jamilian, M.; Asemi, Z. The effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on glucose metabolism and lipid profiles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Endocrinol. 2017, 86, 560–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rahmani, E.; Jamilian, M.; Samimi, M.; Zarezade Mehrizi, M.; Aghadavod, E.; Akbari, E.; Tamtaji, O.R.; Asemi, Z. The effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on gene expression related to insulin, lipid and inflammation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2018, 34, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Izadi, A.; Shirazi, S.; Taghizadeh, S.; Gargari, B.P. Independent and Additive Effects of Coenzyme Q10 and Vitamin E on Cardiometabolic Outcomes and Visceral Adiposity in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Arch. Med. Res. 2019, 50, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ates, O.; Bilen, H.; Keles, S.; Hakan Alp, H.; Keleş, M.S.; Yıldırım, K.; Ondaş, O.; Pınar, L.C.; Civelekler, C.; Baykal, O. Plasma coenzyme Q10 levels in type 2 diabetic patients with retinopathy. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 6, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. El-ghoroury, E.A.; Raslan, H.M.; Badawy, E.A.; El-Saaid, G.S.; Agybi, M.H.; Siam, I.; Salem, S.I. Malondialdehyde and coenzyme Q10 in platelets and serum in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Correlation with glycemic control. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2009, 20, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yamashita, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Simultaneous detection of ubiquinol and ubiquinone in human plasma as a marker of oxidative stress. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 250, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hasegawa, G.; Yamamoto, Y.; Zhi, J.G.; Yamasaki, M.; Yano, M.; Nakajima, T.; Fukui, M.; Yoshikawa, T.; Nakamura, N. Daily profile of plasma %CoQ10 level, a biomarker of oxidative stress, in patients with diabetes manifesting postprandial hyperglycaemia. Acta Diabetol. 2005, 42, 179–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Huang, H.; Chi, H.; Liao, D.; Zou, Y. Effects of coenzyme Q10 on cardiovascular and metabolic biomarkers in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pooled analysis. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2018, 11, 875–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Maheshwari, R.A.; Balaraman, R.; Sen, A.K.; Seth, A.K. Effect of coenzyme Q10 alone and its combination with metformin on streptozotocin-nicotinamide-induced diabetic nephropathy in rats. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2014, 46, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Maheshwari, R.; Balaraman, R.; Sen, A.K.; Shukla, D.; Seth, A. Effect of concomitant administration of coenzyme Q10 with sitagliptin on experimentally induced diabetic nephropathy in rats. Ren. Fail. 2017, 39, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Lee, S.K.; Lee, J.O.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, N.; You, G.; Moon, J.W.; Sha, J.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, Y.W.; Kang, H.J.; et al. Coenzyme Q10 increases the fatty acid oxidation through AMPK-mediated PPARalpha induction in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Cell Signal. 2012, 24, 2329–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Feige, J.N.; Gelman, L.; Michalik, L.; Desvergne, B.; Wahli, W. From molecular action to physiological outputs: Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors are nuclear receptors at the crossroads of key cellular functions. Prog. Lipid Res. 2006, 45, 120–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tsai, K.L.; Chen, L.H.; Chiou, S.H.; Chiou, G.Y.; Chen, Y.C.; Chou, H.Y.; Chen, L.K.; Chen, H.Y.; Chiu, T.H.; Tsai, C.S.; et al. Coenzyme Q10 suppresses oxLDL-induced endothelial oxidative injuries by the modulation of LOX-1-mediated ROS generation via the AMPK/PKC/NADPH oxidase signaling pathway. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 55, S227–S240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kaikkonen, J.; Nyyssönen, K.; Porkkala-Sarataho, E.; Poulsen, H.E.; Metsä-Ketelä, T.; Hayn, M.; Salonen, R.; Salonen, J.T. Effect of oral coenzyme Q10 supplementation on the oxidation resistance of human VLDL+LDL fraction: Absorption and antioxidative properties of oil and granule-based preparations. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1997, 22, 1195–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sarmiento, A.; Diaz-Castro, J.; Pulido-Moran, M.; Moreno-Fernandez, J.; Kajarabille, N.; Chirosa, I.; Guisado, I.M.; Javier Chirosa, L.; Guisado, R.; Ochoa, J.J. Short-term ubiquinol supplementation reduces oxidative stress associated with strenuous exercise in healthy adults: A randomized trial. Biofactors 2016, 42, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sharifi, N.; Tabrizi, R.; Moosazadeh, M.; Mirhosseini, N.; Lankarani, K.B.; Akbari, M.; Chamani, M.; Kolahdooz, F.; Asemi, Z. The effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on lipid profiles among patients with metabolic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 2729–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sahebkar, A.; Simental-Mendıa, L.E.; Stefanutti, C.; Pirro, M. Supplementation with coenzyme Q10 reduces plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations but not other lipid indices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 105, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Geovanini, G.R.; Libby, P. Atherosclerosis and inflammation: Overview and updates. Clin. Sci. 2018, 132, 1243–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Farsi, F.; Heshmati, J.; Keshtkar, A.; Irandoost, P.; Meri, A.; Akbari, A.; Jannani, L.; Morshedzadeh, N.; Vafa, M. Can Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation Effectively Reduce Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and interleukin-6 Levels in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 148, 104290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Fan, L.; Feng, Y.; Chen, G.C.; Qin, L.Q.; Fu, C.L.; Chen, L.H. Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on inflammatory markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacol. Res. 2017, 119, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Bozkurt, B. What Is New in Heart Failure Management in 2017? Update on ACC/AHA Heart Failure Guidelines. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2018, 20, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jessup, M.; Marwick, T.H.; Ponikowski, P.; Voors, A.A.; Yancy, C.W. 2016 ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guideline update—What is new and why is it important? Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2016, 13, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, L.; Eisen, H.J. Epidemiology of heart failure and scope of the problem. Cardiol. Clin. 2014, 32, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mozaffarian, D.; Benjamin, E.J.; Go, A.S.; Arnett, D.K.; Blaha, M.J.; Cushman, M.; Das, S.R.; de Ferranti, S.; Després, J.P.; Fullerton, H.J.; et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee; Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016, 133, e38–e360. [Google Scholar]
  81. Maggioni, A.P. Epidemiology of Heart Failure in Europe. Heart Fail. Clin. 2015, 11, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Meyer, S.; Brouwers, F.P.; Voors, A.A.; Hillege, H.L.; de Boer, R.A.; Gansevoort, R.T.; van der Harst, P.; Rienstra, M.; van Gelder, I.C.; van Veldhuisen, D.J.; et al. Sex differences in new-onset heart failure. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2015, 104, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kannel, W.B. Incidence and epidemiology of heart failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 2000, 5, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Florkowski, C.M.; Molyneux, S.L.; Young, J.M. Coenzyme Q10 and congestive heart failure: An evolving evidence base. Kardiol. Polska. 2015, 73, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Folkers, K.; Vadhanavikit, S.; Mortensen, S.A. Biochemical rationale and myocardial tissue data on the effective therapy of cardiomyopathy with coenzyme Q10. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Kitamura, N.; Yamaguchi, A.; Otaki, M.; Sawatani, O.; Minoji, T.; Tamura, H.; Atobe, M. Myocardial tissue level of coenzyme Q10 in patients with cardiac failure. Biomed. Clin. Asp. Coenzyme Q. 1984, 4, 221–229. [Google Scholar]
  87. Judy, W.V.; Stogsdill, W.W.; Folkers, K. Myocardial preservation by therapy with coenzyme Q10 during heart surgery. Clin. Investig. 1993, 71, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Weber, C.; Bysted, A.; Hłlmer, G. The coenzyme Q10 content of the average Danish diet. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 1997, 67, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
  89. Onur, S.; Niklowitz, P.; Jacobs, G.; Lieb, W.; Menke, T.; Döring, F. Association between serum level of ubiquinol and NT-proBNP, a marker for chronic heart failure, in healthy elderly subjects. Biofactors 2015, 41, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mortensen, S.A.; Rosenfeldt, F.; Kumar, A.; Dolliner, P.; Filipiak, K.J.; Pella, D.; Alehagen, U.; Steurer, G.; Littarru, G.P. Q-SYMBIO Study Investigators. The effect of coenzyme Q10 on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure: Results from Q-SYMBIO: A randomized double-blind trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2014, 2, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lei, L.; Liu, Y. Efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in patients with cardiac failure: A meta-analysis of clinical trials. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2017, 17, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Fotino, A.D.; Thompson-Paul, A.M.; Bazzano, L.A. Effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on heart failure: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 97, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Sander, S.; Coleman, C.I.; Patel, A.A.; Kluger, J.; White, C.M. The impact of coenzyme Q10 on systolic function in patients with chronic heart failure. J. Card Fail. 2006, 12, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Belardinelli, R.; Mucaj, A.; Lacalaprice, F.; Solenghi, M.; Principi, F.; Tiano, L.; Littarru, G.P. Coenzyme Q10 improves contractility of dysfunctional myocardium in chronic heart failure. Biofactors 2005, 25, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Munkholm, H.; Hansen, H.H.; Rasmussen, K. Coenzyme Q10 treatment in serious heart failure. Biofactors 1999, 9, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Keogh, A.; Fenton, S.; Leslie, C.; Aboyoun, C.; Macdonald, P.; Zhao, Y.C.; Bailey, M.; Rosenfeldt, F. Randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of coenzyme Q, therapy in class II and III systolic heart failure. Heart Lung Circ. 2003, 12, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Langsjoen, P.H. Lack of effect of coenzyme Q on left ventricular function in patients with congestive heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000, 35, 816–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Soja, A.M.; Mortensen, S.A. Treatment of congestive heart failure with coenzyme Q10 illuminated by metaanalysis of clinical trials. Mol. Asp. Med. 1997, 18, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Swedberg, K.; Hoffman-Bang, C.; Rehnqvist, N.; Astrom, H. Coenzyme Q10 as adjunctive in treatment of congestive heart failure. J. Card Fail. 1995, 1, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Shi, H.; Noguchi, N.; Niki, E. Dynamics of antioxidant action of ubiquinol: A reappraisal. Biofactors 1999, 9, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Morisco, C.; Trimuco, B.; Condorelh, M. Effect of coenzyme therapy in patients with congestive heart failure: A long term multicentre randomized study. Clin. Investig. 1993, 71, S134–S136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Mortensen, S.A.; Leth, A.; Agner, E.; Rohde, M. Coenzyme Q10: Clinical benefits with biochemical correlates suggesting a scientific breakthrough in the management of chronic heart failure. Int. J. Tissue React. 1990, 12, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Beyer, R. An analysis of coenzyme Q in free radical generation and as an antioxidant. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1992, 70, 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Niibori, K.; Wroblewski, K.P.; Yokoyama, H.; Juan, A.; Crestanello, J.A.; Whitman, G.J.R. Bioenergetic effect of liposomal coenzyme Q10 on myocardial ischaemia reperfusion injury. Biofactors 1999, 9, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Cohn, J.N.; Ferrari, R.; Sharpe, N. Cardiac remodelling. Concepts and clinical implications: A consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000, 35, 569–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Ulla, A.; Mohamed, M.K.; Sikder, B.; Rahman, A.T.; Sumi, F.A.; Hossain, M.; Mahmud, H.; Rahman, G.M.S.; Alam, M.A. Coenzyme Q10 prevents oxidative stress and fibrosis in isoprenaline induced cardiac remodeling in aged rats. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Singh, R.B.; Niaz, M.A.; Rastogi, S.S.; Sharma, J.P.; Kumar, R.; Bishnoi, I.; Beegom, R. Plasma levels of antioxidant vitamins and oxidative stress in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Acta Cardiol. 1994, 49, 411–452. [Google Scholar]
  108. Grech, E.D.; Jackson, M.; Ramsdale, D.R. Reperfusion injury after acute myocardial infarction. Br. Med. J. 1995, 310, 477–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Singh, R.B.; Fedacko, J.; Mojto, V.; Pella, D. Coenzyme Q10 Modulates Remodeling Possibly by Decreasing Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Dhalla, A.K.; Hill, M.; Singal, P.K. Role of oxidative stress in the transition of hypertrophy to heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1996, 28, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Senior, R.; Basu, S.; Kinsey, C.; Schaeffer, S.; Lahiri, A. Carvidilol prevents remodeling in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 1999, 137, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Khaper, N.; Singal, P.K. Effects of after load reducing drugs on the pathogenesis of antioxidant changes and congestive heart failure in rats. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1997, 219, 856–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Wang, T.J.; Larson, M.G.; Levy, D.; Vasan, R.S.; Leip, E.P.; Wolf, P.A.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Kannel, W.B.; Benjamin, E.J. Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2003, 107, 2920–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Maisel, W.H.; Stevenson, L.W. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and rationale for therapy. Am. J. Cardiol. 2003, 91, 2D–8D. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hynes, B.J.; Luck, J.C.; Wolbrette, D.L.; Bhatta, L.; Khan, L.; Samii, S.; Naccarelli, G.V. Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2003, 18, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zozina, V.I.; Covantev, S.; Goroshko, O.A.; Krasnykh, L.M.; Kukes, V.G. Coenzyme Q10 in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases: Current State of the Problem. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2018, 14, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kumar, A.; Kaur, H.; Devi, P.; Mohan, V. Role of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) in cardiac disease, hypertension and Meniere-like syndrome. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009, 124, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. de Frutos, F.; Gea, A.; Hernandez-Estefania, R.; Rabago, G. Prophylactic treatment with coenzyme Q10 in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Could an antioxidant reduce complications? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2015, 20, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Zhao, Q.; Kebbati, A.H.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Okello, E.; Huang, C. Effect of coenzyme Q10 on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. J. Investig. Med. 2015, 63, 735–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Senes, M.; Erbay, A.R.; Yilmaz, F.M.; Topkaya, C.; Zengi, O.; Dogan, M.; Yucel, D. Coenzyme Q10 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in ischemic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2008, 46, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Manzoli, U.; Rossi, E.; Littarru, G.P.; Frustaci, A.; Lippa, S.; Oradei, A.; Aureli, V. Coenzyme Q10 in dilated cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Tissue React. 1990, 12, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  122. Soongswang, J.; Sangtawesin, C.; Durongpisitkul, K. The effect of coenzyme Q10 on idiopathic chronic dilated cardiomyopathy in children. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2005, 26, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kocharian, A.; Shabanian, R.; Rafiei-Khorgami, M.; Kiani, A.; Heidari-Bateni, G. Coenzyme Q10 improves diastolic function in children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiol. Young 2009, 19, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Langsjoen, P.H.; Langsjoen, A.; Willis, R.; Folkers, K. Treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with coenzyme Q10. Mol. Asp. Med. 1997, 18, S145–S151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Adarsh, K.; Kaur, H.; Mohan, V. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) in isolated diastolic heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Biofactors 2008, 32, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Conklin, K.A. Coenzyme Q10 for prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2005, 4, 110–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Greenlee, H.; Shaw, J.; Lau, Y.I.; Naini, A.; Maurer, M. Lack of effect of coenzyme Q10 on doxorubicin cytotoxicity in breast cancer cell cultures. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Mustafa, H.N.; Hegazy, G.A.; Awdan, S.A.E.; AbdelBaset, M. Protective role of COQ10 or L-carnitine on the integrity of the myocardium in doxorubicin induced toxicity. Tissue Cell 2017, 49, 410–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Moskowitz, M.A.; Lo, E.H.; Iadecola, C. The science of stroke: Mechanisms in search of treatments. Neuron 2010, 67, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Kleinig, T.J.; Vink, R. Suppression of inflammation in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: Therapeutic options. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2009, 22, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Simani, L.; Ryan, F.; Hashemifard, S.; Hooshmandi, E.; Madahi, M.; Sahraei, Z.; Razaei, O.; Heydari, K.; Ramezami, M. Serum Coenzyme Q10 is associated with clinical neurological outcomes in acute stroke patients. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 31, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Allen, C.; Bayraktutan, U. Oxidative stress and its role in the pathogenesis of ischaemic stroke. Int. J. Stroke 2009, 4, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Nasoohi, S.; Simani, L.; Khodagholi, F.; Nikseresht, S.; Faizi, M.; Naderi, N. Coenzyme Q10 supplementation improves acute outcomes of stroke in rats pretreated with atorvastatin. Nutr. Neurosci. 2017, 22, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Liu, G.; Geng, J. Glial fibrillary acidic protein as a prognostic marker of acute ischemic stroke. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2018, 37, 1048–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sharpe, P.C.; Mulholland, C.; Trinick, T. Ascorbate and malondialdehyde in stroke patients. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 1994, 163, 488–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Milanlioglu, A.; Aslan, M.; Ozkol, H.; Çilingir, V.; Nuri Aydın, M.; Karadas, S. Serum antioxidant enzymes activities and oxidative stress levels in patients with acute ischemic stroke: Influence on neurological status and outcome. Wien. Klin Wochenschr. 2016, 128, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ramezani, M.; Sahraei, Z.; Simani, L.; Heydari, K.; Shahidi, F. Coenzyme Q10 supplementation in acute ischemic stroke: Is it beneficial in short-term administration? Nutr. Neurosci. 2018, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Girndt, M.; Seibert, E. Premature cardiovascular disease in chronic renal failure (CRF): A model for an advanced ageing process. Exp. Gerontol. 2010, 45, 797–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Go, A.S.; Chertow, G.M.; Fan, D.; McCulloch, C.E.; Hsu, C.Y. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1296–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Stenvinkel, P.; Diczfalusy, U.; Lindholm, B.; Heimburger, O. Phospholipid plasmalogen, a surrogate marker of oxidative stress, is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in patients on renal replacement therapy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2004, 19, 972–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Himmelfarb, J.; McMenamin, M.E.; Loseto, G.; Heinecke, J.W. Myeloperoxidase-catalyzed 3-chlorotyrosine formation in dialysis patients. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 1163–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mehmetoglu, I.; Yerlikaya, F.H.; Kurban, S.; Erdem, S.S.; Tonbul, Z. Oxidative stress markers in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, including coenzyme Q10 and ischemia-modified albumin. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2012, 35, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Bakhshayeshkaram, M.; Lankarani, K.B.; Mirhosseini, N.; Tabrizi, R.; Akbari, M.; Dabbaghmanesh, M.H.; Asemi, Z. The Effects of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Metabolic Profiles of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 3710–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Gholnari, T.; Aghadavod, E.; Soleimani, A.; Hamidi, G.A.; Sharifi, N.; Asemi, Z. The Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on glucose metabolism, lipid profiles, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with diabetic nephropathy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2018, 37, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhang, X.; Shi, Z.; Liu, Q.; Quan, H.; Cheng, X. Effects of coenzyme Q10 intervention on diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2019, 98, e15850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Shojaei, M.; Djalali, M.; Khatami, M.; Siassi, F.; Eshraghian, M. Effects of carnitine and coenzyme Q10 on lipid profile and serum levels of lipoprotein(a) in maintenance hemodialysis patients on statin therapy. Iran. J. Kidney Dis. 2011, 5, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  147. Fallah, M.; Askari, G.; Soleimani, A.; Feizi, A.; Asemi, Z. Clinical trial of the effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on glycemic control and markers of lipid profiles in diabetic hemodialysis patients. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2018, 50, 2073–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zahed, N.S.; Ghassami, M.; Nikbakht, H. Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on C-reactive protein and homocysteine as the inflammatory markers in hemodialysis patients; a randomized clinical trial. J. Nephropathol. 2016, 5, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Rivara, M.B.; Yeung, C.K.; Robinson-Cohen, C.; Phillips, B.R.; Ruzinski, J.; Rock, D.; Linke, L.; Shen, D.D.; Ikizler, T.A.; Himmelfarb, J. Effect of Coenzyme Q10 on Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Cardiac Function in Hemodialysis Patients: The CoQ10 Biomarker Trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2017, 69, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Starr, M.C.; Chang, I.J.; Finn, L.S.; Sun, A.; Larson, A.A.; Goebel, J.; Hanevold, C.; Thies, J.; Van Hove, J.L.K.; Hingorani, S.R.; et al. COQ2 nephropathy: A treatable cause of nephrotic syndrome in children. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2018, 33, 1257–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Mahmoud, A.N.; Mentias, A.; Elgendy, A.Y.; Qazi, A.; Barakat, A.F.; Saad, M.; Mohsen, A.; Abuzaid, A.; Mansoor, H.; Mojadidi, M.K.; et al. Migraine and the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events: A meta-analysis of 16 cohort studies including 1152407 subjects. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e020498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Hershey, A.D.; Powers, S.W.; Vockell, A.L.; Lecates, S.L.; Ellinor, P.L.; Segers, A.; Burdine, D.; Manning, P.; Kabbouche, M.A. Coenzyme Q10 deficiency and response to supplementation in pediatric and adolescent migraine. Headache 2007, 47, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Parohan, M.; Sarraf, P.; Javanbakht, M.H.; Ranji-Burachaloo, S.; Djalali, M. Effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on clinical features of migraine: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Neurosci. 2019, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Zeng, Z.; Li, Y.; Lu, S.; Huang, W.; Di, W. Efficacy of CoQ10 as supplementation for migraine: A meta-analysis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2019, 139, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Rajapakse, T.; Pringsheim, T. Nutraceuticals in Migraine: A Summary of Existing Guidelines for Use. Headache 2016, 56, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Dahri, M.; Tarighat-Esfanjani, A.; Asghari-Jafarabadi, M.; Hashemilar, M. Oral coenzyme Q10 supplementation in patients with migraine: Effects on clinical features and inflammatory markers. Nutr. Neurosci. 2018, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Abdollahzad, H.; Aghdashi, M.A.; Asghari Jafarabadi, M.; Alipour, B. Effects of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Inflammatory Cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) and Oxidative Stress in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch. Med. Res. 2015, 46, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Gaul, C.; Diener, H.C.; Danesch, U.; Migravent® Study Group. Improvement of migraine symptoms with a proprietary supplement containing riboflavin, magnesium and Q10: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial. J. Headache Pain 2015, 16, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Parohan, M.; Sarraf, P.; Javanbakht, M.H.; Foroushani, A.R.; Ranji-Burachaloo, S.; Djalali, M. The synergistic effects of nano-curcumin and coenzyme Q10 supplementation in migraine prophylaxis: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Nutr. Neurosci. 2019, 26, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Fogacci, S.; Fogacci, F.; Cicero, A.F.G. Nutraceuticals and Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: The Available Clinical Evidence. Nutrients 2020, 12, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. WHO. Recommendations for Prevention and Treatment of Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  162. Rana, S.; Lemoine, E.; Granger, J.; Karumanchi, S.A. Preeclampsia: Pathophysiology, Challenges, and Perspectives. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 1094–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Teran, E.; Racines-Orbe, M.; Vivero, S.; Escudero, C.; Molina, G.; Calle, A. Preeclampsia is associated with a decrease in plasma coenzyme Q10 levels. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 35, 1453–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Palan, P.R.; Shaban, D.W.; Martino, T.; Mikhail, M.S. Lipid-soluble antioxidants and pregnancy: Maternal serum levels of coenzyme Q10, alpha-tocopherol and gamma-tocopherol in preeclampsia and normal pregnancy. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2004, 58, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Teran, E.; Hernandez, I.; Nieto, B.; Tavara, R.; Ocampo, J.E.; Calle, A. Coenzyme Q10 supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2009, 105, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Tenório, M.B.; Ferreira, R.C.; Moura, F.A.; Bueno, N.B.; Goulart, M.O.F.; Oliveira, A.C.M. Oral antioxidant therapy for prevention and treatment of preeclampsia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2018, 28, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Corsini, A. Statin-Related Muscle Complaints: An Underestimated Risk. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2005, 19, 379–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Deichmann, R.; Lavie, C.; Andrews, S. Coenzyme Q10 and statin-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Ochsner J. 2010, 10, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  169. Qu, H.; Meng, Y.Y.; Chai, H.; Liang, F.; Zhang, J.Y.; Gao, Z.Y.; Shi, D.Z. The effect of statin treatment on circulating coenzyme Q10 concentrations: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2018, 23, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Qu, H.; Guo, M.; Chai, H.; Wang, W.T.; Gao, Z.Y.; Shi, D.Z. Effects of Coenzyme Q10 on Statin-Induced Myopathy: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018, 7, e009835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Mizuno, K.; Tanaka, M.; Nozaki, S.; Mizuma, M.; Ataka, S.; Tahara, T.; Sugino, T.; Shirai, T.; Kajimoto, Y.; Kuratsune, H.; et al. Antifatigue effects of coenzyme Q10 during physical fatigue. Nutrition 2008, 24, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Lee, Y.J.; Cho, W.J.; Kim, J.K.; Lee, D.C. Effects of coenzyme Q10 on arterial stiffness, metabolic parameters, and fatigue in obese subjects: A double-blind randomized controlled study. J. Med. Food 2011, 14, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Cordero, M.D.; Cano-García, F.J.; Alcocer-Gómez, E.; de Miguel, M.; Sànchez-Alcàzar, J.A. Oxidative stress correlates with headache symptoms in fibromyalgia: Coenzyme Q10 effect on clinical improvement. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Di Pierro, F.; Rossi, A.; Consensi, A.; Giacomelli, C.; Bazzichi, L. Role for a water-soluble form of CoQ10 in female subjects affected by fibromyalgia. A preliminary study. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2017, 35, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  175. Kikkawa, K.; Takehara, I.; Miyakoshi, T.; Miyawaki, H. Safety of High Dose Supplementation of Coenzyme Q10 in Healthy Human Adults. Jpn. J. Food Chem. 2007, 14, 76–81. [Google Scholar]
  176. Bentinger, M.; Dallner, G.; Choknacki, T.; Swiezewska, E. Distrinution and breakdown of labeled coenzyme Q10 in rats. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 34, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Nukui, K.; Yamagishi, T.; Miyawaki, H.; Kettawan, A.; Okamoto, T.; Sato, K. Comparison of uptake between PureSorb-Q40 and regular hydrophobic coenzyme Q10 in rats and humans after single oral intake. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2007, 53, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Bhagavan, H.N.; Chopra, R.K. Coenzyme Q10: Absorption, tissue uptake, metabolism and pharmacokinetics. Free Radic. Res. 2006, 40, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Bhagavan, H.N.; Chopra, R.K. Plasma coenzyme Q10 response to oral ingestion of coenzyme Q10 formulations. Mitochondrion 2007, 7, S78–S88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Tomono, Y.; Hasegawa, J.; Seki, T.; Motegi, K.; Morishita, N. Pharmacokinetic study of deuterium-labeled Coenzyme-Q10 in man. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1986, 24, 536–541. [Google Scholar]
  181. Weis, M.; Mortensen, S.A.; Rassing, M.R.; Møller-Sonnergaard, J.; Poulsen, G.; Rasmussen, S.N. Bioavailability of four oral coenzyme Q10 formulations in healthy volunteers. Mol. Asp. Med. 1994, 15, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Miles, M.V.; Horn, P.; Miles, L.; Tang, P.; Steele, P.; De Grauw, T. Bioequivalence of coenzyme Q10 from over-the-counter supplements. Nutr. Res. 2002, 22, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Kumar, S.; Rao, R.; Kumar, A.; Mahant, S.; Nanda, S. Novel Carriers for Coenzyme Q10 Delivery. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2016, 13, 1184–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Pravst, I.; Zmitek, K. The coenzyme Q10 content of food supplements. J. Verbrauch. Lebensm. J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 2011, 6, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Pravst, I.; Prosek, M.; Wondra, A.G.; Zmitek, K.; Zmitek, J. The Stability of Coenzyme Q10 in Fortified Foods. Acta Chim. Slov. 2009, 56, 953–958. [Google Scholar]
  186. Evans, M.; Baisley, J.; Barss, S.; Guthrie, N. A randomized, double-blind trial on the bioavailability of two CoQ10 formulations. J. Funct. Foods 2009, 1, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, X.Q.; Chen, C.Y.O. Ubiquinol is superior to ubiquinone to enhance Coenzyme Q10 status in older men. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 5653–5659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Zmitek, J.; Smidovnik, A.; Fir, M.; Prosek, M.; Zmitek, K.; Walczak, J.; Pravst, I. Relative bioavailability of two forms of a novel water soluble Coenzyme Q10. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2008, 52, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. López-Lluch, G.; Del Pozo-Cruz, J.; Sánchez-Cuesta, A.; Cortés-Rodríguez, A.B.; Navas, P. Bioavailability of coenzyme Q10 supplements depends on carrier lipids and solubilization. Nutrition 2019, 57, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Weber, C.; Bysted, A.; Hølmer, G. Coenzyme Q10 in the diet-daily intake and relative bioavailability. Mol. Asp. Med. 1997, 18, S251–S254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Wajda, R.; Zirkel, J.; Schaffer, T. Increase of bioavailability of coenzyme Q10 and vitamin E. J. Med. Food 2007, 10, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Martinefski, M.; Samassa, P.; Buontempo, F.; Höcht, C.; Lucangioli, S.; Tripodi, V. Relative bioavailability of coenzyme Q10 formulation for paediatric individualized therapy. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2017, 69, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Constantinescu, R.; McDermott, M.P.; Dicenzo, R. A randomized study of the bioavailability of different formulations of coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinone). J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2007, 47, 1580–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Lucker, P.W.; Wetzelsberger, N.; Hennings, G.; Rehn, D. Pharmacokinetics of coenzyme ubidecarenone in healthy volunteers. In Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984; pp. 141–151. [Google Scholar]
  195. Hosoe, K.; Kitano, M.; Kishida, H.; Kubo, H.; Fujii, K.; Kitahara, M. Study on safety and bioavailability of ubiquinol (Kaneka QH) after single and 4-week multiple oral administration to healthy volunteers. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007, 47, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Molyneux, S.; Florkowski, C.; Lever, M.; George, P. The bioavailability of coenzyme Q10 supplements available in New Zealand differs markedly. N. Z. Med. J. 2004, 117, U1108. [Google Scholar]
  197. Young, J.M.; Molyneux, S.L.; Florkowski, C.M.; Frampton, C.M.; George, P.M.; Scott, R.S. Pharmacokinetic comparison of a generic coenzyme Q10 solubilizate and a formulation with soybean phytosterols. Phytother. Res. 2012, 26, 1092–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of CoQ10.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of CoQ10.
Antioxidants 09 00341 g001
Figure 2. Involvement of CoQ10 deficiency and cardiovascular disease risk factors. ATP: adenosine triphosphate; CI: cardiac input; CO: cardiac output; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; EDV: end-diastolic volume; EF: ejection fraction; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; hs-CRP: high sensible- C reactive protein; IL-6: interleukin-6; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MDA: malondialdehyde; MMSE: mini mental state examination; NIHSS: national institute of health stroke scale; NO: nitric oxide; NF-kB: nuclear factor kappa B; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SBP: systolic blood pressure; SOD: superoxide dismutase; SV: stroke volume; TNF-alpha: tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
Figure 2. Involvement of CoQ10 deficiency and cardiovascular disease risk factors. ATP: adenosine triphosphate; CI: cardiac input; CO: cardiac output; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; EDV: end-diastolic volume; EF: ejection fraction; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; hs-CRP: high sensible- C reactive protein; IL-6: interleukin-6; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MDA: malondialdehyde; MMSE: mini mental state examination; NIHSS: national institute of health stroke scale; NO: nitric oxide; NF-kB: nuclear factor kappa B; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SBP: systolic blood pressure; SOD: superoxide dismutase; SV: stroke volume; TNF-alpha: tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
Antioxidants 09 00341 g002
Figure 3. Coenzyme Q10 physiology: (1) CoQ10 arrives in intestinal lumen with exogenus cholesterol after a meal (if administered in fed state. (2) CoQ10 is taken up from the mixed micelles, together with the meal fats and bile and pancreatic secretions, which facilitate its solubilization and the entrance in the enterocytes via the simple passive facilitated diffusion. (3) CoQ10 is incorporated in the chylomicrons and subsequently reaches the bloodstream through the lymphatic system. (4) Through the bloodstream, CoQ10 is distributed to peripheral tissues (5) and to the liver (6), where it is partially re-excreted in the bile and eliminated with the faeces.
Figure 3. Coenzyme Q10 physiology: (1) CoQ10 arrives in intestinal lumen with exogenus cholesterol after a meal (if administered in fed state. (2) CoQ10 is taken up from the mixed micelles, together with the meal fats and bile and pancreatic secretions, which facilitate its solubilization and the entrance in the enterocytes via the simple passive facilitated diffusion. (3) CoQ10 is incorporated in the chylomicrons and subsequently reaches the bloodstream through the lymphatic system. (4) Through the bloodstream, CoQ10 is distributed to peripheral tissues (5) and to the liver (6), where it is partially re-excreted in the bile and eliminated with the faeces.
Antioxidants 09 00341 g003
Table 1. Distribution of ubiquinone and ubiquinol in human tissues (modified from References [4,5]).
Table 1. Distribution of ubiquinone and ubiquinol in human tissues (modified from References [4,5]).
OrganUbiquinone Concentration (µg/g)Ubiquinol Concentration (µg/g)
Plasma (µmol/mL)1.196.0
Table 2. Coenzyme Q10: clinical applications in cardiovascular diseases.
Table 2. Coenzyme Q10: clinical applications in cardiovascular diseases.
Level of EvidenceActive Daily DosesEffects on Symptoms and/or Grade of DiseaseEffects on Lab or Instrumental ParametersEffects on Hard Outcomes
Heart Failure (HF)Meta-analysis of RCTs100–300 mg ↑ self-perceived quality of life and improvement in NYHA class↑ EF (if >30%), ↑ LVEF, ↑ CO and CI, ↑ SV, ↑ EDV, ↑ exercise capacity, ↓ ventricular arrhythmias after surgery and need of inotropic drugs (after cardiac surgery), and ↓ low-grade inflammation (TNF-alpha, IL-6, and hsCRP)↓ MACE, total mortality, and incidence of hospital stays for HF
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)RCTs120 mg Not investigatedPrevention of alteration of the wall thickening abnormality at the infarct site and sphericity index and ↓ wall thickness opposite the site of infarctionNot investigated
Ischemic Stroke (IS)RCTs300 mg ↑ NIHSS and MMSEReduction of oxidative stress (?)Not investigated
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)Meta-analysis of RCTs100–300 mg Improvement in NYHA class, reduction of risk to develop ventricular arrhythmias, and use of inotropic drugs after surgeryReduction of malondialdehyde and oxidative stressNot investigated
CardiomyopathyRCTs200–300 mg Improvement of fatigue and dyspneaImprovement of mean interventricular septal thickness, mean posterior wall thickness, diastolic function, and mean score for the index of cardiac failureNot investigated
CardiotoxicityRCTs200–300 mg Improvement of heart’s functions (in association with L-carnitine)Reduction of oxidative stress (nitric oxide and malondialdehyde) and ↓IL-1, TNF-α Troponin-l and Troponin-T levels (in association with L-carnitine)Not investigated
HypertensionMeta-analysis of RCTs100–300 mg Not reported↑ Exercise capacity and arterial stiffness, ↑ NO bioavailability, and ↓ SBP and DBP (only in prehypertensive or hypertensive patients)Not investigated
Diabetes type II, Metabolic syndrome (MetS)RCTs100–300 mgNot reported↓ Lipid peroxidation, FPG, triglycerides, and low-grade inflammation (TNF-alpha, IL-6, and hsCRP) and ↑ insulin sensitivityNot investigated
DyslipidemiaRCTs100–300 mg ↑ self-perceived quality of life (reduction side effects of lipid-lowering drugs)↑ Exercise capacity and arterial stiffness; ↓ lipid peroxidation, TC*, LDL-C*, TG*, BP*, FPG*, and low-grade inflammation (TNF-alpha, IL-6, and hsCRP); and ↑ insulin sensitivity
*If >12 weeks of treatment
Not investigated
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)Meta-analysis of RCTs100–300 mg Improvement in NAFLD grade↑ Adiponectin (?) and leptin levels; ↓ AST, GGT, hsCRP, and TNF-alpha levels; and ↓ WC and lipid peroxidationNot investigated
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)Meta-analysis of RCTs100–300 mg Not investigated↓ Lipid peroxidation, TC (?), LDL-C (?), Lp(a) (?), triglycerides (?), fasting plasma glucose (?), HbA1c (?), inflammation, and oxidative stress biomarkers (hsCRP (?) and malondialdehyde) and ↑ insulin sensitivityNot investigated
AST = Aspartate Aminotransferase, BP = Blood Pressure, CI = Cardiac Input, CO = Cardiac Output, DBP = Diastolic Blood Pressure, EDV = End-Diastolic Volume, EF = Ejection Fraction, FPG = Fasting Plasma Glucose, GGT = Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase, HF = Heart Failure, hsCRP = high sensible C-Reactive Protein, IL-6 = Interleukin 6, LDL-C = LDL-Cholesterol, Lp(a) = Lipoprotein a, LVEF = Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, MACE = Major Adverse Cardiac Events, MMSE = Mini Mental State Examination, NIHSS = National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, NYHA = New York Heart Association, NO = Nitric Oxide, RCTs = Randomized Clinical Trials, SBP = Systolic Blood Pressure, SV = Stroke Volume, TC = Total Cholesterol, TG = triglycerides, TNF-alpha = Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, WC = Waist Circumference. ↓: Worsening; ↑: Improvement; ?: Unclear.
Table 3. Comparative study of ΔCmax after a single dose of different formulations of CoQ10 (adapted from López-Lluch et al. [188]).
Table 3. Comparative study of ΔCmax after a single dose of different formulations of CoQ10 (adapted from López-Lluch et al. [188]).
Type of FormulationSubjectsTested DosageΔCmaxReference
Myoquinon (softgel)Both gender (10 M, 4 F), age 18–30100 mg1.069[189]
KOJ, CoQ10 (softgel)Both gender (10 M, 4 F), age 18–30100 mg0.238
ICT, CoQ10 (softgel)Both gender (10 M, 4 F), age 18–30100 mg0.351
ERG, CoQ10 (softgel)Both gender (10 M, 4 F), age 18–30100 mg0.258
Ubquinol QH (softgel)Both gender (10 M, 4 F), age 18–30100 mg0.473
NYD CoQ10 (hard gel)Both gender (10 M, 4 F), age 18–30100 mg0.381
SMF CoQ10Both gender (10 M, 4 F), age 18–30100 mg0.181
Capsule CoQ10 9 M, age 18–3030 mg0.31[190]
Gelatin capsule CoQ10 + vitamin EBoth gender (12 M, 12 F)100 mg0.025[191]
NanoSolve (purified phospholipids) capsule CoQ10 + vitamin EBoth gender (12 M, 12 F)100 mg0.103
Capsule CoQ10 (powder-filled hard-shell gelatine capsule)Both gender (3 M, 3 F), age 18–40250 mg0.490[192]
Liquid (O/W liquid emulsion (20 mg/mL))Both gender (3 M, 3 F), age 18–40250 mg0.980
Chewable waferBoth gender (15 M, 10 F), elderly people600 mg0.770[193]
Chewable wafer + 300 IU vitamin E Both gender (15 M, 10 F), elderly people600 mg0.660
Softgel capsules (Mega Q-Gel “100”) CoQ10 solubilized in an oil-based vehicle + 900 IU d-alpha tocopherolBoth gender (15 M, 10 F), elderly people600 mg0.690
Hard gelatin capsuleBoth gender (15 M, 10 F), elderly people600 mg0.660
Powder 333 mg 0.980[194]
Kaneka QH, ubiquinol (softgel capsules) Both gender (5 M, 5 F)150 mg1.061[195]
5 M300 mg2.506
Chewable tablets10 M, age 21–28150 mg0.120[196]
Capsule liquid10 M, age 21–28150 mg0.149
Capsule liquid10 M, age 21–28150 mg0.152
Capsule powder10 M, age 21–28150 mg0.175
Capsule liquid10 M, age 21–28150 mg0.197
Softgel10 M, age 21–28150 mg0.277
Q-gel (CoQ10 solubilized in an oil-based vehicle + vitamin E) softgel10 M, age 21–28150 mg0.506
Q-gel (CoQ10 solubilized in an oil-based vehicle + vitamin E) softgel8 M, age 20–2660 mg
150 mg
300 mg
Softgel CoQ1036 M, age 18–40100 mg0.259[197]
Softgel CoQ10 + sterols36 M, age 18–40100 mg0.189
Hardgel (CoQ10 + 400 mg 400 mg of Emcompress)Both gender (5 M, 5 F), age 24–30100 mg0.775[180]
Softgel Bioqinon (CoQ10 + 400 mg of soybean oil)Both gender (5 M, 5 F), age 24–30100 mg1.454
Softgel (CoQ10 + 20 mg of polysorbate 80, 100 mg of lecithin + 280 mg of soybean oil)Both gender (5 M, 5 F), age 24–30100 mg0.837
Softgel (CoQ10 + 20 mg of polysorbate 80 + 380 mg of soybean oil)Both gender (5 M, 5 F), age 24–30100 mg0.883
Myoqinon (soy-oil matrix, drug specification heat/cooling recrystallization procedure); KOJ, CoQ10 (same as Myoqinon but without heat/cooling procedure); ICT, CoQ10 (olive oil, cocoa-butter produced accordingly normal softgel filling technology); ERG, CoQ10 (olive oil, cocoa-butter, 25 mg vitamin C produced accordingly normal softgel filling technology); Ubiqinol QH (MCT-oil, 12 mg vitamin C); NYD, CoQ10 (fine grinded (micronized) CoQ10 powder); SMF, CoQ10 (olive-oil/soy-oil matrix produced accordingly normal softgel filling technology); NanoSolve (Lipoid GmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany); Kaneka QH (ubiquinol emulsified with diglycerol monooleate, rapeseed oil, soy lecithin, and beeswax).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martelli, A.; Testai, L.; Colletti, A.; Cicero, A.F.G. Coenzyme Q10: Clinical Applications in Cardiovascular Diseases. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 341.

AMA Style

Martelli A, Testai L, Colletti A, Cicero AFG. Coenzyme Q10: Clinical Applications in Cardiovascular Diseases. Antioxidants. 2020; 9(4):341.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martelli, Alma, Lara Testai, Alessandro Colletti, and Arrigo F. G. Cicero. 2020. "Coenzyme Q10: Clinical Applications in Cardiovascular Diseases" Antioxidants 9, no. 4: 341.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop