Next Article in Journal
In-Vitro Antioxidant Properties of Lipophilic Antioxidant Compounds from 3 Brown Seaweed
Previous Article in Journal
Oxidative Imbalance and Kidney Damage: New Study Perspectives from Animal Models to Hospitalized Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/antiox8120595
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Circulating Interleukin-6 Level, Dietary Antioxidant Capacity, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer

by
Jimi Kim
1,
Jeonghee Lee
1,
Jae Hwan Oh
2,
Hee Jin Chang
2,
Dae Kyung Sohn
2,
Aesun Shin
3,4 and
Jeongseon Kim
1,*
1
Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Korea
2
Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Korea
3
Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
4
Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2019, 8(12), 595; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8120595
Submission received: 21 October 2019 / Revised: 25 November 2019 / Accepted: 26 November 2019 / Published: 28 November 2019
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chronic inflammation is one of the causes of colorectal cancer (CRC), and circulating levels of inflammatory biomarkers have been linked to tumor promotion and progression. We aimed to evaluate the interleukin-6 (IL-6) level in CRC patients and determine whether a diet rich in antioxidants was associated with CRC. This study included 654 cases and 1312 controls matched for age and sex. We measured the plasma IL-6 concentration and estimated dietary antioxidant capacity based on oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) combined with a 106-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. The IL-6 concentration was significantly increased in individuals with CRC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 6.23, 4.10–9.45, p < 0.001). High dietary ORAC showed an inverse association with CRC (total ORAC OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.26, 0.16–0.40, p < 0.001; total phenolics = 0.32, 0.21–0.50, p < 0.001). We found that low dietary ORAC was associated with a significant increase in CRC in the group with elevated IL-6 levels (total ORAC OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 4.34, 3.12–6.02, p < 0.001; total phenolics = 4.61, 3.33–6.39, p < 0.001). This study suggested an inverse association between dietary antioxidant capacity and IL-6 level among patients with CRC.

1. Introduction

Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second most common cause of death worldwide [1]. It is estimated that approximately 1.8 million new cases of CRC occurred and 881000 people worldwide died from CRC in 2018 [1]. The incidence and mortality patterns and trends in CRC burden have demonstrated that the development of CRC is linked to dietary pattern, lifestyle factors, obesity, family history of CRC, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [1,2]. Moreover, the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) has indicated the known major risk factors for CRC and has revealed that diet, nutrition, and physical activity reduce the risk of CRC [3].
The association of chronic inflammation with CRC has been described in the growing literature. Chronic inflammation may give rise to oncogenesis in the context of CRC via continual unregulated proliferation, apoptosis and genetic mutations [4,5]. The activation of the immune response in immune cells produces inflammatory cytokines that may lead to the development and progression of CRC [6,7]. Chronic inflammation mediated by reactive oxygen or nitrogen species has been linked to the development of sporadic and colitis-associated CRC, leading to the release of several proinflammatory cytokines associated with tumor promotion and progression [8]. Among proinflammatory cytokines, several studies have reported that the pleiotropic cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), which is produced by various cell types, contributes to the inhibition of the apoptosis and proliferation of tumor cells [9,10,11]. Many studies have shown a correlation between IL-6 expression and the risk of CRC [5,11]. Increased expression of IL-6 was found both in patients with CRC and in tumor tissue [12,13,14]. Growing evidence suggests that the biological linkage between IL-6 induced signaling and chronic inflammation through oxidative stress resulting from the effect of reactive oxygen species on DNA repair mechanisms resulted in the development of CRC [5,15].
Previous studies have reported that diets rich in antioxidants from fruits and vegetables have shown an inverse association with the risk of CRC [16,17,18,19]. Antioxidants play a role in the prevention of free radical-induced oxidative damage to cells, which means that they neutralize reactive oxygen species [20,21]. An assay of oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) has been proposed to provide a parameter reflecting antioxidant activities in foods, which describes the cumulative capacity of food components to scavenge free radicals, as well as other synergistic antioxidant effects related inflammatory complications [22,23,24,25]. Several epidemiological studies have shown the associations between total antioxidant capacity based on ORAC and health benefits, although the results were inconsistent depending on the type of disease [26,27,28]. However, no study has yet assessed the associations between dietary ORAC and CRC risk underlying the plasma IL-6 level, which is regarded as a tumor-promoting biomarker.
Therefore, the objectives of this study were, first, to estimate the plasma IL-6 level associated with CRC risk; second, to compare the dietary ORAC between controls and CRC cases; and third, to identify the associations between dietary ORAC, the plasma IL-6 levels, and the risk of CRC in a Korean population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

In this study, participants were recruited from the Center for Colorectal Cancer of the National Cancer Center in Korea in cooperation with the Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection at the same hospital; participants attended the center either for a health check-up or for a CRC diagnosis. Patients who were newly diagnosed with CRC by pathological confirmation of adenocarcinoma via endoscopic biopsies were recruited from August 2010 to August 2013. We used the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) database to determine whether participants had cancer and then selected cancer-free controls between October 2007 and December 2014. All of the participants were asked to provide a questionnaire on demographics and lifestyles, a 106-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SQFFQ), and a blood sample. Of the participants in this study, including 1070 cases and 14201 controls, those with an incomplete demographic questionnaire or SQFFQ and those reporting implausible energy intake (<500 kcal/day or >4000 kcal/day) were excluded. Among the participants enrolled in this study, we analyzed-plasma IL-6 biomarker in 2531 subjects including 696 cases and 1835 controls. We used the frequency matching method between the cases and controls at a ratio of 1:2 by 5-year age group and sex. Consequently, the total number of participants was 1966 including 654 cases and 1312 controls after removing outliers (<0.5%, >99.5%) of plasma levels of IL-6 biomarker (Figure S1). We used the International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems 10th revision (ICD-10) to classify the anatomical location of CRC. The anatomic sites were categorized into two groups as colon cancer combined with proximal colon and distal colon and rectal cancer: Proximal colon (cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse colon, and splenic flexure); distal colon (descending colon, sigmoid-descending colon junction, and sigmoid colon); and rectum (rectosigmoid colon and rectum). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center Korea (IRB No.NCCNCS-10-350 and No.NCC2015-0202). All participants signed an informed consent form before participation.

2.2. Dietary Assessment and Dietary Antioxidant Capacity Based on the ORAC Database

Dietary intake data of participants were obtained using a validated 106-item SQFFQ from a well-trained interviewer [29]. The SQFFQ included the portion size (small, medium, large) and frequency of consumption (never or rarely, 1 time per month, 2–3 times per month, 1–2 times per week, 3–4 times per week, 5–6 times per week, 1 time per day, 2 times per day, 3 times per day) for each food item consumed within the past 12 months. Analysis of the SQFFQ including the nutrient and energy content of each food item was performed using CAN-PRO 4.0 (Computer Aided Nutritional analysis program, Korean Nutrition Society, Seoul, Korea).
To calculate the dietary total antioxidant capacity for each participant, we estimated the levels of hydrophilic ORAC (H-ORAC), lipophilic ORAC (L-ORAC), total ORAC (T-ORAC), and total phenolics (TPs) from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Database for Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) of Selected Foods, Release 2 (www.ars.usda.gov) [25]. The individual indices of ORAC were reported in μmol of Trolox equivalents per 100 g (μmol TE/100 g) for H-ORAC, L-ORAC, and T-ORAC and in mg gallic acid equivalents per 100 g (mgGAE/100 g) for TPs. In terms of matching between a 106-item of the SQFFQ and ORAC database, 56 food items from the SQFFQ had antioxidant contents, and these items consisted mainly of fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, and tea. The validity and reproducibility of the findings showed that plasma ORAC was correlated with FFQ-based ORAC intake, providing FFQ-based ORAC values to assess antioxidant intake from foods [30].

2.3. Laboratory Assays for IL-6 Biomarker Concentration

The plasma from the blood specimens obtained from each participant was separated and stored at −80 ℃. Plasma concentrations of IL-6 (pg/mL) were measured using a commercially available Quantikine HS human IL-6 Immunoassay with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The t-test and the x2 test were used for the comparison of general characteristics between cases and controls, and we use mean and standard deviation (SD) or percentage and number to describe the results. The distribution of plasma IL-6 levels and dietary ORAC are presented as the median and interquartile range (IQR) and were assessed by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The values of IL-6 were log-transformed to improve the normality of the distribution. We used the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for IL-6 to determine the diagnostic ability between the two groups. We conducted the analysis of contributing foods of each dietary ORAC represented up to 90% of the cumulative contribution among 56 food items. Energy adjustment of dietary ORAC, including H-ORAC, L-ORAC, T-ORAC, TPs, and their contributing foods, was performed using the residual method [31]. We analyzed odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using unconditional logistic regression models and expressed ORs per quartile of IL-6 concentration and dietary ORAC based upon the quartile distribution among controls. To analyze the associations between dietary ORAC and the levels of IL-6, we divided each subtype of ORAC (low/high) into two groups based on the median levels of the control. The multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education level, occupation, income, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, physical activity, first-degree family history of CRC, and total energy intake. We used a multinomial logistic regression to compare controls and individuals with each anatomic site subtype of CRC. All statistical tests were two-sided, and all analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

The sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. When comparing two groups, the control group demonstrated a higher education level, prevalence of a professional occupation, income, and prevalence of regular exercise and a lower percentage of ex-alcohol consumers and individuals with a first-degree family history of CRC than the case group (p < 0.05). The controls had a significantly lower intake of total energy than the cases (1693.04 ± 562.86 vs. 2022.17 ± 525.74, p < 0.001). With respect to the dietary ORAC from the SQFFQ, we observed that the mean values of H-ORAC (μmolTE/d), L-ORAC (μmolTE/d), T-ORAC (μmolTE/d), and TPs (mgGAE/d) were significantly lower in cases (H-ORAC: 4870.43 ± 3806.52 vs. 3323.50 ± 2008.79, L-ORAC: 196.45 ± 116.62 vs. 147.06 ± 75.94, T-ORAC: 5062.87 ± 3863.00 vs. 3467.73 ± 2048.26, TPs: 452.36 ± 386.38 vs. 301.44 ± 222.92, p < 0.001). For the biomarker analysis, the plasma concentration of IL-6 (pg/mL) was significantly higher in the cases (3.64 ± 5.68) than in the controls (1.93 ± 2.39) (p < 0.001). The median levels of IL-6 was significantly different between the cases and the controls (1.36 vs. 2.14, p < 0.001). We assessed the correlation between dietary ORAC and IL-6 biomarker in all study participants at baseline (Table S1). There were inverse correlations of H-ORAC (r = −0.116, p < 0.001), L-ORAC (r = −0.097, p < 0.001), T-ORAC (r = −0.116, p < 0.001), and TPs (r = −0.123, p < 0.001) with plasma IL-6 concentration. Additionally, to determine the optimal cut-off values for CRC between the two diagnostic groups, we calculated the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with the sensitivity and specificity of the CRC diagnosis as a biomarker (Figure S2). The AUC for the plasma IL-6 concentration was 0.70 and a cut-off value (sensitivity, 1- specificity) was 1.62 (0.68, 0.63) indicating a moderation of CRC diagnostic accuracy.
Table 2 shows the associations between quartiles of the plasma IL-6 concentration and the risk of CRC. A significant association was observed between the IL-6 levels and the risk of CRC in the highest quartile of IL-6 compared to the lowest quartile after adjusting for the confounding variables (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 6.23, 4.10–9.45, p < 0.001). When stratified by anatomic site of CRC, we observed a significantly increased the risk of colon cancer (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 4.77, 2.93–7.76, p < 0.001), as well as rectal cancer (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 8.06, 4.52–14.39, p < 0.001), after considering the aforementioned confounding variables.
Table 3 shows the associations between dietary ORAC and the risk of CRC. A significantly decreased the risk of CRC was observed in individuals with higher dietary ORAC and its subtypes in multivariable models as follows: H-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.29, 0.19–0.44, p < 0.001); L-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.18, 0.12–0.29, p < 0.001); T-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.26, 0.16–0.40, p < 0.001); and TPs (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.32, 0.21–0.50, p < 0.001). When the results were stratified by anatomic site, we observed a significantly decreased the risk of colon cancer associated with dietary ORAC in the multivariable models as follows: H-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.30, 0.18–0.51, p < 0.001); L-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.08–0.27, p < 0.001); T-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.25, 0.15–0.44, p < 0.001); and TPs (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.21–0.61, p < 0.001). In addition, we found similar associations of dietary ORAC with the risk of rectal cancer in the multivariable models as follows: H-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.27, 0.15–0.47, p < 0.001); L-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.23, 0.13–0.40, p < 0.001); T-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.24, 0.14–0.43, p < 0.001); and TPs (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 0.29, 0.16–0.52, p < 0.001).
Table 4 shows the associations between dietary ORAC and plasma levels of IL-6 in terms of the risk of CRC. According to the subgroups of dietary ORAC, we found that a high level of IL-6 was strongly associated with an increased the risk of CRC in the lower intake of H-ORAC, L-ORAC, T-ORAC, and TPs groups in the comparison between the highest and lowest quartiles as follows: H-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 4.26, 3.07–5.91, p < 0.001); L-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 4.70, 3.38–6.52, p < 0.001); T-ORAC (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 4.34, 3.12–6.02, p < 0.001); and TPs (OR Q4 vs. Q1, 95% CI = 4.61, 3.33–6.39, p < 0.001), after adjusting for the aforementioned confounding variables.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that CRC occurrence increased as the concentration of plasma IL-6 increased, and high dietary ORAC was associated with a decreased the risk of CRC in a Korean population. Moreover, we observed inverse associations between dietary antioxidant capacity and plasma IL-6 level among patients with CRC.
Concerning CRC, chronic inflammation is an important risk factor for tumor development [32]. Active inflammation in colorectal mucosa results in the development of CRC through long-term colitis that may affect immune cells and their products [4,32]. Many of the molecular alterations are linked to the inflammatory process involved in CRC carcinogenesis; these alterations involve cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) genes, which are related to the regulation of the expression of various cytokines and oxidative stress that contribute to neoplastic transformation [4,5]. Growing evidence has reported that the cytokines released by activated tumor cells play a role in tumor progression by promoting the growth, differentiation, and survival of tumor cells [33]. Moreover, in terms of cytokines, an inflamed epithelium produces excessive reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that affect colorectal tumorigenesis including tumor promotion and progression by genetic alteration [33,34]. As a proinflammatory cytokine, IL-6 and IL-6 signaling are associated with CRC development [11,35]. Several studies have reported that higher circulating IL-6 levels were significantly correlated with CRC status, demonstrating associations with tumor size, stage, and metastasis [12,13,36]. In addition, a recent systematic review described that the IL-6 levels were linked to short overall survival including in patients with CRC, suggesting its use as a prognostic biomarker for CRC [37]. In this study, we analyzed the AUC, sensitivity and specificity between plasma levels of IL-6 and CRC, providing evidence for its use as a biomarker for CRC diagnosis. Furthermore, we also observed that plasma IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with CRC than in controls, revealing associations between IL-6 levels and the risk of CRC. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that IL-6 produced by inflamed epithelial cells mediates the promotion of tumorigenesis by activating the downstream Janus kinases (JAKs) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) [10,11,12].
In the tumor microenvironment, the activated inflammatory cells produce not only inflammatory cytokines but also reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, leading to DNA damage and mutation [34]. The inflammatory cytokines may stimulate the generation of reactive oxygen species in inflamed cells, resulting in epigenetic alterations, genetic instability, aberrant methylation, and carcinogenesis [5,34]. Several studies have demonstrated that the reactive oxygen species released by epithelia and immune cells may have mechanistic links including COX-2, NF-kB, p53, DNA mismatch repair genes, and others [5].
To prevent the development of carcinogenesis by free radicals and reactive oxygen species, a wide range of antioxidants and antitumor activities are required [34,38]. Numerous studies have been performed on the effects of antioxidants derived from various types of food in regard to their antitumor properties [39]. The ORAC database is one of the USDA National Nutrient Databases focused on the degree of inhibition of peroxy-radical-induced oxidation associated with foods [25]. Several studies have shown that ORAC from foods may have associations with preventing the development of human diseases. Dietary ORAC showed an inverse association with hypertension in type 2 diabetic patients in a cross-sectional study, suggesting that dietary antioxidants may decrease the risk of hypertension [26]. In particular, phenolic intake, based on the ORAC database, decreased the risk of endometrial cancer, revealing the role of antioxidants in preventing carcinogenesis [27]. However, the intake of antioxidants, based on ORAC, was not associated with the risk of preeclampsia, although the serum total antioxidant capacity showed a positive association with preeclampsia [28]. In this study, we used a 106-item SQFFQ with the ORAC database and then analyzed the antioxidant activities of fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, and tea. We observed a decreased the risk of CRC when comparing the highest quartile of dietary ORAC with the lowest quartile.
Antioxidants are abundant in not only fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, and wine but also tea, providing evidence that a high content of antioxidants derived from foods may have an impact on the prevention of cancer, including CRC [39]. Regarding CRC caused by oxidative stress, there are numerous studies showing that the consumption of foods rich in antioxidants can affect the risk of CRC [40]. Some of the most common antioxidants are polyphenols, tocopherols, carotenoids, curcumin, and vitamin C, which provide antioxidant effects, including the regulation of cellular proliferation, apoptosis, and gene expression in the context of colorectal carcinogenesis [40,41]. In this study, when we compared the major consumption of foods contributing to H-ORAC, L-ORAC, T-ORAC, and TPs between the controls and cases, it shows the different major components in accordance with H-ORAC, L-ORAC, T-ORAC, and TPs. In H-ORAC, the cases were more likely to have less intake of green tea, grapes, apples, strawberries, sweet potatoes, radishes, potatoes, plums, bananas, peaches, soybeans, tomato juice, lettuce, and lemon juice than controls (p < 0.05) (Table S2). In L-ORAC, the cases consumed less red pepper, bananas, sweet potatoes, black pepper, potatoes, lettuce, apples, peanuts, garlic, radishes, mushroom, watermelon, strawberries, peaches and carrots than controls (p < 0.05) (Table S3). The results of T-ORAC showed the similar major components with H-ORAC and L-ORAC (Table S4). In TPs, the cases had a lower intake of tomato juice, apples, potatoes, bananas, strawberries, sweet potatoes, cabbages, radishes, catsup, watermelon, raisins, plums, peanuts, peaches, lemon juice, lettuce, red pepper, and soybeans than controls (p < 0.05) (Table S5). Although some epidemiological studies have reported conflicting data, there is strong mechanistic evidence for the effect of antioxidants on CRC induced by reactive oxygen species, demonstrating protective mechanisms that neutralize the production of free radicals [42,43,44].
Although we controlled for potential confounding factors including family history of CRC and modifiable lifestyle factors in this study, it should be mentioned regarding other factors affecting the inflammation of gastrointestinal (GI) tract and cancer. During decades, many evidences have determined that inflammation plays a role in the development of cancer and is involved in all stages of tumorigenesis [45,46]. There are several stimuli of inflammation of GI tract including somatic mutations and environmental factors such as dietary factors, obesity, tobacco smoking, pollutants, and medications resulted in DNA damage, genomic instability, and tumor promotion [46]. As the result of inflammation, different types of immune cells are in the process of either tumor promoting mechanisms or anti-tumorigenic mechanisms by producing the reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen intermediates, cytokines, and chemokines in tumor initiation and promotion [46,47]. Among the dietary factors, numerous studies have reported that phytochemicals such as flavonoids rich in fruits and vegetables mainly contributed to regulation of immune system via production of antioxidants and scavenging activity [48,49,50]. Previous epidemiological studies have reported the associations between dietary antioxidants and cancer suggesting the role of the inflammation [50,51]. In this study, we examined the dietary antioxidant capacity and plasma IL-6 level, one of the major tumor-promoting cytokines, regarding risk of CRC. Given that inflammation involves complex cross-talk and interaction into molecular and cellular mechanisms with all stages of tumor development, future studies with a prospective design are needed to achieve the understanding of associations between dietary antioxidant capacity, IL-6 level, and risk of CRC with comprehensive factors in the inflammatory tumor microenvironment.
This study has several strengths. We used a comprehensive and validated SQFFQ and then calculated dietary ORAC including the contents of fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, and tea. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet reported the associations between dietary ORAC and the risk of CRC. This study attempted to use a parameter reflecting antioxidant activities in diet, providing comparison of food components to scavenge free radicals and other synergistic antioxidant effects. We examined whether the elevated level of plasma IL-6 was associated with an increased the risk of CRC and assessed its role as a proinflammatory biomarker in CRC carcinogenesis. Therefore, this study determined not only the association between diets rich in antioxidant activities and CRC risk, but also the measurement of plasma IL-6 level as a possible correlation between them. This study suggests that further study is necessary to explore the molecular and cellular mechanism based on the associations between dietary antioxidant capacity, IL-6 level, and risk of CRC.
There are limitations to this study. Because of the hospital-based case-control design, potential selection bias and recall bias should be considered. The control groups recruited from a health check-program underwent a health screening and therefore may have had healthier lifestyle and dietary habits than patients with CRC. In addition, we matched a 106-item SQFFQ with the USDA ORAC database, which included several contends, so dietary ORAC might be insufficiently covered for all items reported in the SQFFQ. Moreover, the sample size was relatively small to explore the interactive associations between dietary antioxidant capacity, IL-6 level, and the risk of CRC.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, higher dietary ORAC was inversely associated with the risk of CRC in the subgroup with elevated plasma IL-6 levels. Given that there were associations between plasma IL-6 concentration and CRC risk, we suggest that plasma IL-6 level is a possible intermediate biomarker for diagnosis of CRC. This study provides the further evidence regarding the associations between dietary antioxidant capacity, IL-6 level, and risk of CRC. In addition, this study may provide the importance of consideration on antioxidant capacity derived from foods to establish the more effective dietary guidelines and public health policy to reduce the risk of CRC.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at online https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/8/12/595/s1. Figure S1: Flow chart of study participants, Figure S2: The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for IL-6, Table S1: Spearman correlation coefficient of plasma IL-6 level and dietary ORAC in study participants, Table S2: Comparison of the consumption of dietary H-ORAC contributing foods, Table S3: Comparison of the consumption of dietary L-ORAC contributing foods, Table S4: Comparison of the consumption of dietary T-ORAC contributing foods, Table S5: Comparison of the consumption of dietary TPs contributing foods.

Author Contributions

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows: conceptualization, J.K. (Jimi Kim ) and J.K. (Jeongseon Kim); methodology, J.K. (Jimi Kim) and J.K. (Jeongseon Kim); formal Analysis, J.K. (Jimi Kim); investigation, J.K. (Jimi Kim) and J.K. (Jeongseon Kim); Data Curation, J.L., J.H.O., H.J.C., D.K.S., A.S. and J.K. (Jeongseon Kim); Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.K. (Jimi Kim); Writing—Review and Editing, J.L., J.H.O., H.J.C., D.K.S., and A.S.; Supervision, J.K. (Jeongseon Kim).

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Cancer Center in Korea (No.1710882, No.1810090, and No.1910330).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare having no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arnold, M.; Sierra, M.S.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 2017, 66, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Turati, F.; Bravi, F.; Di Maso, M.; Bosetti, C.; Polesel, J.; Serraino, D.; Dalmartello, M.; Giacosa, A.; Montella, M.; Tavani, A.; et al. Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research recommendations and colorectal cancer risk. Eur. J. Cancer 2017, 85, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Itzkowitz, S.H.; Yio, X. Inflammation and cancer IV. Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: The role of inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2004, 287, G7–G17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kraus, S.; Arber, N. Inflammation and colorectal cancer. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2009, 9, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mantovani, A.; Allavena, P.; Sica, A.; Balkwill, F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008, 454, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seruga, B.; Zhang, H.; Bernstein, L.J.; Tannock, I.F. Cytokines and their relationship to the symptoms and outcome of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 887–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reuter, S.; Gupta, S.C.; Chaturvedi, M.M.; Aggarwal, B.B. Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: How are they linked? Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 49, 1603–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mitsuyama, K.; Sata, M.; Rose-John, S. Interleukin-6 trans-signaling in inflammatory bowel disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006, 17, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rose-John, S. IL-6 trans-signaling via the soluble IL-6 receptor: Importance for the pro-inflammatory activities of IL-6. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 1237–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Waldner, M.J.; Foersch, S.; Neurath, M.F. Interleukin-6-a key regulator of colorectal cancer development. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 1248–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Knupfer, H.; Preiss, R. Serum interleukin-6 levels in colorectal cancer patients—A summary of published results. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2010, 25, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chung, Y.-C.; Chang, Y.-F. Serum interleukin-6 levels reflect the disease status of colorectal cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2003, 83, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Komoda, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Honda, M.; Matsuo, Y.; Hazama, K.; Takao, T. Interleukin-6 levels in colorectal cancer tissues. World J. Surg. 1998, 22, 895–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Waldner, M.J.; Neurath, M.F. Mechanisms of immune signaling in colitis-associated cancer. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 1, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Steinmetz, K.A.; Kushi, L.H.; Bostick, R.M.; Folsom, A.R.; Potter, J.D. Vegetables, fruit, and colon cancer in the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994, 139, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Voorrips, L.E.; Goldbohm, R.A.; van Poppel, G.; Sturmans, F.; Hermus, R.J.; van den Brandt, P.A. Vegetable and fruit consumption and risks of colon and rectal cancer in a prospective cohort study: The Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000, 152, 1081–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Terry, P.; Giovannucci, E.; Michels, K.B.; Bergkvist, L.; Hansen, H.; Holmberg, L.; Wolk, A. Fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber, and risk of colorectal cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Riboli, E.; Norat, T. Epidemiologic evidence of the protective effect of fruit and vegetables on cancer risk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 78 (Suppl. S3), 559S–569S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lobo, V.; Patil, A.; Phatak, A.; Chandra, N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2010, 4, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rahman, K. Studies on free radicals, antioxidants, and co-factors. Clin. Interv. Aging 2007, 2, 219–236. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Cao, G.; Alessio, H.M.; Cutler, R.G. Oxygen-radical absorbance capacity assay for antioxidants. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1993, 14, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cao, G.; Prior, R.L. Measurement of oxygen radical absorbance capacity in biological samples. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Cao, G.; Booth, S.L.; Sadowski, J.A.; Prior, R.L. Increases in human plasma antioxidant capacity after consumption of controlled diets high in fruit and vegetables. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 1081–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Haytowitz, D.B.; Bhagwat, S. USDA Database for the Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) of Selected Foods, Release 2; US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  26. Farvid, M.S.; Homayouni, F.; Kashkalani, F.; Shirzadeh, L.; Valipour, G.; Farahnak, Z. The associations between oxygen radical absorbance capacity of dietary intake and hypertension in type 2 diabetic patients. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2013, 27, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gifkins, D.; Olson, S.H.; Demissie, K.; Lu, S.E.; Kong, A.N.; Bandera, E.V. Total and individual antioxidant intake and endometrial cancer risk: Results from a population-based case-control study in New Jersey. Cancer Causes Control 2012, 23, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sheikhi, M.; Sharifi-Zahabi, E.; Paknahad, Z. Dietary antioxidant capacity and its association with preeclampsia. Clin. Nutr. Res. 2017, 6, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahn, Y.; Kwon, E.; Shim, J.E.; Park, M.K.; Joo, Y.; Kimm, K.; Park, C.; Kim, D.H. Validation and reproducibility of food frequency questionnaire for Korean genome epidemiologic study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 1435–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rautiainen, S.; Serafini, M.; Morgenstern, R.; Prior, R.L.; Wolk, A. The validity and reproducibility of food-frequency questionnaire-based total antioxidant capacity estimates in Swedish women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Willett, W.C.; Howe, G.R.; Kushi, L.H. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997, 65, 9S–31S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Coussens, L.M.; Werb, Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002, 420, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Klampfer, L. Cytokines, inflammation and colon cancer. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2011, 11, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Terzic, J.; Grivennikov, S.; Karin, E.; Karin, M. Inflammation and colon cancer. Gastroenterology 2010, 138, 2101–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, S.W.; Sun, Y.M. The IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway: Potential therapeutic strategies in treating colorectal cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 44, 1032–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Belluco, C.; Nitti, D.; Frantz, M.; Toppan, P.; Basso, D.; Plebani, M.; Lise, M.; Jessup, J.M. Interleukin-6 blood level is associated with circulating carcinoembryonic antigen and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2000, 7, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vainer, N.; Dehlendorff, C.; Johansen, J.S. Systematic literature review of IL-6 as a biomarker or treatment target in patients with gastric, bile duct, pancreatic and colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 29820–29841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rajendran, P.; Nandakumar, N.; Rengarajan, T.; Palaniswami, R.; Gnanadhas, E.N.; Lakshminarasaiah, U.; Gopas, J.; Nishigaki, I. Antioxidants and human diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta 2014, 436, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mut-Salud, N.; Alvarez, P.J.; Garrido, J.M.; Carrasco, E.; Aranega, A.; Rodriguez-Serrano, F. Antioxidant intake and antitumor therapy: Toward nutritional recommendations for optimal results. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 6719534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Carini, F.; Mazzola, M.; Rappa, F.; Jurjus, A.; Geagea, A.G.; Al Kattar, S.; Bou-Assi, T.; Jurjus, R.; Damiani, P.; Leone, A.; et al. Colorectal carcinogenesis: Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants. Anticancer Res. 2017, 37, 4759–4766. [Google Scholar]
  41. Perse, M. Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: Cause or consequence? Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 725710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pais, R.; Dumitrascu, D.L. Do antioxidants prevent colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis. Rom. J. Intern. Med. 2013, 51, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Sreevalsan, S.; Safe, S. Reactive oxygen species and colorectal cancer. Curr. Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2013, 9, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Lin, S.; Li, Y.; Zamyatnin, A.A., Jr.; Werner, J.; Bazhin, A.V. Reactive oxygen species and colorectal cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 5119–5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Greten, F.R.; Grivennikov, S.I. Inflammation and cancer: Triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Immunity 2019, 51, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Grivennikov, S.I.; Greten, F.R.; Karin, M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 2010, 140, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Crusz, S.M.; Balkwill, F.R. Inflammation and cancer: Advances and new agents. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 12, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ahn-Jarvis, J.H.; Parihar, A.; Doseff, A.I. Dietary flavonoids for immunoregulation and cancer: Food design for targeting disease. Antioxidants (Basel) 2019, 8, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kristo, A.S.; Klimis-Zacas, D.; Sikalidis, A.K. Protective role of dietary berries in cancer. Antioxidants (Basel) 2016, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Li, Y.; Zhang, T.; Chen, G.Y. Flavonoids and colorectal cancer prevention. Antioxidants (Basel) 2018, 7, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rodríguez-García, C.; Sánchez-Quesada, C.J.; Gaforio, J. Dietary flavonoids as cancer chemopreventive agents: An updated review of human studies. Antioxidants (Basel) 2019, 8, 137. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. General characteristics of study participants.
Table 1. General characteristics of study participants.
Controls (n = 1312)Cases (n = 654)p-Value a
Age (years)
Mean ± SD56.10 ± 9.2156.44 ± 9.600.45
Sex (n, %)
Male895 (68.22)446 (68.20)>0.99
Female417 (31.78)208 (31.80)
Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) (n, %)
Mean ± SD24.26 ± 2.8824.14 ± 3.520.44
<25828 (63.03)411 (62.84)0.92
≥25484 (36.89)243 (37.16)
Education level (n, %)
Middle school or less201 (15.32)241 (36.85)<0.001
High school422 (32.16)248 (37.92)
College or more658 (50.15)165 (25.23)
Occupation (n, %)
Professionals, administrative, management, office jobs339 (25.84)136 (20.80)<0.001
Sales and service positions284 (21.65)27 (4.13)
Agriculture, manufacturing, mining, army service165 (12.58)108 (16.51)
Housekeeping, unemployment, and others510 (38.87)383 (58.56)
Income (10,000 won/month) (n, %)
<200284 (21.65)226 (34.56)<0.001
200–400536 (40.85)428 (65.44)
>400379 (28.89)0 (0.00)
Smoking status (n, %)
None575 (43.83)298 (45.57)0.05
Ex-smoker496 (37.80)214 (32.72)
Current-smoker241 (18.37)142 (21.71)
Alcohol drinking status (n, %)
None406 (30.95)200 (30.58)0.025
Ex-drinker121 (9.22)86 (13.15)
Current-drinker785 (59.83)368 (56.27)
Physical activity status (n, %)
Yes759 (57.85)207 (31.65)<0.001
No545 (41.54)447 (68.35)
First-degree family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) (n, %)
Yes73 (5.56)57 (8.72)0.008
No1239 (94.44)597 (91.28)
Total caloric intake (kcal/day)
Mean ± SD1693.04 ± 562.862022.17 ± 525.74<0.001
semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SQFFQ)- oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC)
hydrophilic ORAC (H-ORAC) (μmolTE/d)
Mean ± SD b4870.43 ± 3806.523323.50 ± 2008.79<0.001 d
Median 3796.642837.11
(interquartile range (IQR)) c(2350.58, 6181.32)(1961.12, 4185.10)
lipophilic ORAC (L-ORAC) (μmolTE/d)
Mean ± SD b196.45 ± 116.62147.06 ± 75.94<0.001 d
Median 173.96134.98
(IQR) c(120.81, 248.60)(96.27, 183.24)
total ORAC (T-ORAC) (μmolTE/d)
Mean ± SD b5062.87 ± 3863.003467.73 ± 2048.26<0.001 d
Median 4022.772987.32
(IQR) c(2485.96, 6465.70)(2080.73, 4363.09)
TPs (mgGAE/d)
Mean ± SD b452.36 ± 386.38301.44 ± 222.92<0.001 d
Median 344.79242.71
(IQR) c(195.37, 581.23)(168.91, 363.96)
IL-6 (pg/mL)
Mean ± SD1.93 ± 2.393.64 ± 5.68<0.001 d
Median 1.362.14
(IQR) c(0.98, 2.04)(1.42, 3.46)
ORAC: Oxygen radical absorbance capacity; H-ORAC: Hydrophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity; L-ORAC: Lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity; T-ORAC: Total oxygen radical absorbance capacity; TPs: Total phenolics; TE: Trolox equivalents; GAE: Gallic acid equivalents. a P-values were calculated using the χ2 test for categorical variables and the t-test for continuous variables. b Dietary ORAC was adjusted for total energy intake using the residual method. c IQR, interquartile ranges. d Wilcoxon test was used for significant p-values that met the 5% level.
Table
Table 2. Association between plasma IL-6 concentration and CRC risk stratified by anatomic site.
Table 2. Association between plasma IL-6 concentration and CRC risk stratified by anatomic site.
Plasma IL-6 Concentration (pg/mL)
Q1 (<0.98)Q2 (0.98 to <1.36)Q3 (1.36 to <2.04)Q4 (≥2.04)P for Trend
Colorectal cancer
No. controls/cases328/52328/94328/154328/354
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)1.81 (1.25–2.62)2.96 (2.09–4.20)6.81 (4.90–9.46)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)1.97 (1.24–3.11)2.82 (1.82–4.37)6.23 (4.10–9.45)<0.001
Colon cancer
No. controls/cases328/32328/46328/80328/176
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)1.44 (0.89–2.31)2.50 (1.61–3.87)5.50 (3.66–8.26)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)1.63 (0.94–2.84)2.33 (1.39–3.92)4.77 (2.93–7.76)<0.001
Rectal cancer
No. controls/cases328/20328/48328/72328/168
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)2.40 (1.39–4.13)3.60 (2.14–6.05)8.40 (5.16–13.69)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)2.42 (1.29–4.55)3.48 (1.90–6.39)8.06 (4.52–14.39)<0.001
Q, quartile. REF: Reference. a Multivariable odds ratio (OR) was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education level, occupation, income, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, first-degree family history of CRC, and total energy intake. Significant p-values that met the 5% level.
Table
Table 3. Association between dietary ORAC and CRC risk stratified by anatomic site.
Table 3. Association between dietary ORAC and CRC risk stratified by anatomic site.
Dietary ORAC
Q1Q2Q3Q4P for Trend
Colorectal Cancer
H-ORAC (μmolTE/d)<2350.582350.58 to <3796.643796.64 to <6181.33≥6181.32
No. controls/cases328/242328/211328/147328/54
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)0.87 (0.69–1.11)0.61 (0.47–0.78)0.22 (0.16–0.31)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)0.94 (0.69–1.29)0.68 (0.48–0.96)0.29 (0.19–0.44)<0.001
L-ORAC (μmolTE/d)<120.81120.81 to <173.96173.96 to <248.60≥248.60
No. controls/cases328/277328/193328/141328/43
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.51 (0.40–0.66)0.16 (0.11–0.22)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)0.82 (0.60–1.13)0.59 (0.42–0.83)0.18 (0.12–0.29)<0.001
T-ORAC (μmolTE/d)2485.962485.96 to <4022.774022.77 to <6465.70≥6465.70
No. controls/cases328/248328/207328/148328/51
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)0.84 (0.66–1.06)0.60 (0.46–0.77)0.21 (0.15–0.29)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)0.92 (0.67–1.27)0.68 (0.48–0.96)0.26 (0.16–0.40)<0.001
TPs (mgGAE/d)195.37195.37 to <344.79344.79 to <581.24≥581.24
No. controls/cases328/231328/246328/122328/55
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)1.07 (0.84–1.35)0.53 (0.40–0.69)0.24 (0.17–0.33)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)1.23 (0.90–1.67)0.54 (0.38–0.78)0.32 (0.21–0.50)<0.001
Colon Cancer
H-ORAC (μmolTE/d)
No. controls/cases328/111328/118328/76328/29
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)1.06 (0.79–1.44)0.69 (0.49–0.95)0.26 (0.17–0.40)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)1.19 (0.81–1.73)0.67 (0.44–1.03)0.30 (0.18–0.51)<0.001
L-ORAC (μmolTE/d)
No. controls/cases328/131328/107328/76328/20
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)0.82 (0.61–1.10)0.58 (0.42–0.80)0.15 (0.09–0.25)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)1.01 (0.70–1.47)0.62 (0.41–0.93)0.15 (0.08–0.27)<0.001
T-ORAC (μmolTE/d)
No. controls/cases328/116328/114328/77328/27
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)0.98 (0.73–1.33)0.66 (0.48–0.92)0.23 (0.15–0.36)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)1.13 (0.78–1.65)0.66 (0.43–1.00)0.25 (0.15–0.44)<0.001
TPs (mgGAE/d)
No. controls/cases328/102328/144328/57328/31
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)1.41 (1.05–1.90)0.56 (0.39–0.80)0.30 (0.20–0.47)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)1.65 (1.14–2.40)0.51 (0.32–0.80)0.35 (0.21–0.61)<0.001
Rectal Cancer
H-ORAC (μmolTE/d)
No. controls/cases328/125328/90328/70328/23
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)0.72 (0.53–0.98)0.56 (0.40–0.78)0.18 (0.12–0.29)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)0.77 (0.52–1.14)0.67 (0.43–1.02)0.27 (0.15–0.47)<0.001
L-ORAC (μmolTE/d)
No. controls/cases328/138328/84328/63328/23
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)0.61 (0.45–0.83)0.46 (0.33–0.64)0.17 (0.10–0.27)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)0.73 (0.50–1.08)0.64 (0.42–0.97)0.23 (0.13–0.40)<0.001
T-ORAC (μmolTE/d)
No. controls/cases328/126328/90328/70328/22
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)0.71 (0.52–0.98)0.56 (0.40–0.77)0.18 (0.11–0.28)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)0.77 (0.52–1.14)0.69 (0.45–1.06)0.24 (0.14–0.43)<0.001
TPs (mgGAE/d)
No. controls/cases328/123328/99328/63328/23
Crude OR (95% CI)1.0 (ref)0.81 (0.59–1.09)0.51 (0.37–0.72)0.19 (0.12–0.30)<0.001
Multivariable OR (95% CI) a1.0 (ref)0.94 (0.64–1.38)0.55 (0.36–0.86)0.29 (0.16–0.52)<0.001
Q, quartile. ORAC: Oxygen radical absorbance capacity; H-ORAC: Hydrophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity; L-ORAC: Lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity; T-ORAC: Total oxygen radical absorbance capacity; TPs: Total phenolics; TE: Trolox equivalents; GAE: Gallic acid equivalents; REF: Reference. a Multivariable odds ratio (OR) was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education level, occupation, income, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, first-degree family history of CRC, and total energy intake. Significant p-values that met the 5% level.
Table
Table 4. Association between dietary ORAC and plasma IL-6 concentration regarding to CRC risk.
Table 4. Association between dietary ORAC and plasma IL-6 concentration regarding to CRC risk.
Plasma IL-6 Concentration (pg/mL)
Q1 (<0.98)Q2 (0.98 to <1.36)Q3 (1.36 to <2.04)Q4 (≥2.04)
No.
Controls/Cases		Multivariable
OR (95% CI) a		No.
Controls/Cases		Multivariable
OR (95% CI) a		No.
Controls/Cases		Multivariable
OR (95% CI) a		No.
Controls/Cases		Multivariable
OR (95% CI) a
H-ORAC (μmolTE/d)
Low157/311.0 (ref)156/671.54 (1.02–2.33)168/1021.96 (1.35–2.85)175/2534.26 (3.07–5.91)
High171/211.0 (ref)172/270.33 (0.20–0.56)160/520.57 (0.36–0.88)153/1011.23 (0.86–1.77)
L-ORAC (μmolTE/d)
Low148/331.0 (ref)172/691.56 (1.04–2.34)164/1152.21 (1.53–3.17)172/2534.70 (3.38–6.52)
High180/191.0 (ref)156/250.33 (0.19–0.56)164/390.43 (0.27–0.70)156/1011.10 (0.77–1.59)
T-ORAC (μmolTE/d)
Low155/311.0 (ref)157/661.53 (1.01–2.31)170/1052.05 (1.41–2.98)174/2534.34 (3.12–6.02)
High173/211.0 (ref)171/280.35 (0.21–0.58)158/490.53 (0.34–0.83)154/1011.22 (0.85–1.75)
TPs (mgGAE/d)
Low142/361.0 (ref)160/731.80 (1.20–2.71)174/1022.18 (1.49–3.18)180/2664.61 (3.33–6.39)
High186/161.0 (ref)168/210.25 (0.14–0.44)154/520.53 (0.34–0.83)148/881.13 (0.77–1.66)
ORAC: Oxygen radical absorbance capacity; H-ORAC: Hydrophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity; L-ORAC: Lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity; T-ORAC: Total oxygen radical absorbance capacity; TPs: Total phenolics; TE: Trolox equivalents; GAE: Gallic acid equivalents; REF: Reference. Dietary ORAC was categorized into low and high groups based on the median level of their control group’s intake (H-ORAC: 3796.64 μmolTE/d, L-ORAC: 173.96 μmolTE/d, T-ORAC: 4022.77 μmolTE/d, TPs: 344.79 mgGAE/d). a Multivariable odds ratio (OR) was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education level, occupation, income, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, first-degree family history of CRC, and total energy intake. Significant p-values that met the 5% level.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Oh, J.H.; Chang, H.J.; Sohn, D.K.; Shin, A.; Kim, J. Circulating Interleukin-6 Level, Dietary Antioxidant Capacity, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8120595

AMA Style

Kim J, Lee J, Oh JH, Chang HJ, Sohn DK, Shin A, Kim J. Circulating Interleukin-6 Level, Dietary Antioxidant Capacity, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Antioxidants. 2019; 8(12):595. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8120595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jimi, Jeonghee Lee, Jae Hwan Oh, Hee Jin Chang, Dae Kyung Sohn, Aesun Shin, and Jeongseon Kim. 2019. "Circulating Interleukin-6 Level, Dietary Antioxidant Capacity, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer" Antioxidants 8, no. 12: 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8120595

APA Style

Kim, J., Lee, J., Oh, J. H., Chang, H. J., Sohn, D. K., Shin, A., & Kim, J. (2019). Circulating Interleukin-6 Level, Dietary Antioxidant Capacity, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Antioxidants, 8(12), 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8120595

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop