Next Article in Journal
Melatonin-Mediated Nrf2 Activation as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy in Mutation-Driven Neurodegenerative Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Protective Effects of Magnolol, Rutin, and Gallic Acid in Broilers Challenged with Dietary Oxidized Soybean Oil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

fliC Mediates Pseudomonas plecoglossicida’s Hijack of Inflammatory Immunity and Glucose Metabolism in the Large Yellow Croaker

1
Key Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China
3
Fisheries College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524025, China
4
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Disease Control and Healthy Culture, Zhanjiang 524025, China
5
Animal Science and Technology College, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou 450046, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2025, 14(10), 1189; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14101189
Submission received: 16 August 2025 / Revised: 17 September 2025 / Accepted: 25 September 2025 / Published: 28 September 2025

Abstract

The bacterial flagellum plays a crucial role in pathogenesis. However, the mechanism by which the flagellum interferes with host energy metabolism remains unclear. In this study, we confirmed that deletion of the fliC gene resulted in a 30% reduction in the virulence of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida against the large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Compared to the wild-type strain (WT) infection group, the ΔfliC infection group exhibited a 29.54% decrease in the number of vacuolar degeneration hepatocytes and a 50.83% higher liver glycogen content. Furthermore, infection led to decreased mitochondrial complex V activity, a reduced NAD+/NADH ratio, lower levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), and increased lipid peroxide levels; however, these metabolic perturbations were significantly ameliorated in the ΔfliC group compared to the WT group. Proteomic analysis revealed that the dysregulation of the complement cascade and core carbon metabolic pathways observed in the WT infection group liver was significantly alleviated in the ΔfliC infection group. Additionally, in the ΔfliC infection group, pro-inflammatory genes (such as Tlr5, Tnfα, and Il1β) were downregulated, while lipid metabolism-related genes (such as Acox1, Cpt1a, and Pparα) were upregulated, suggesting the suppression of the Tlr5/NF-κB immune signaling axis and enhanced fatty acid β-oxidation. Collectively, fliC may mediate the disruption of host glucose and lipid metabolism homeostasis through a Tlr5-triggered immunometabolic regulatory axis. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that bacterial flagella modulate host energy metabolism, expanding our understanding of flagellum-mediated pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

The bacterial flagellum is a precision nanomachine assembled through a strictly programmed hierarchical process [1]. As the final extracellular component assembled, the flagellar filament propels bacterial motility, enabling pathogens to colonize host niches efficiently [2]. During host invasion, the flagellum confers versatile functionality upon pathogenic bacteria, enabling remarkable biological adaptations such as sophisticated immune evasion mechanisms [3,4]. As a specialized extracellular structure of bacteria, flagellin is specifically recognized by the host’s TLR5, thereby initiating downstream immune responses including the activation of the NF-κB pathway to induce pro-inflammatory responses [5]. Immune activation and execution are highly energy-intensive processes; therefore, flagella can indirectly disrupt host energy metabolic homeostasis. For example, the flagella of Escherichia coli stimulate the host to produce excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby affecting mitochondrial activity, and the flagella of Candidatus Berkiella cookevillensis exploit the glycolytic pathway of amoebae to fuel its proliferation [6,7]. However, the mechanism by which bacterial flagella mediate the dynamic equilibrium between host energy metabolism and immune regulation remains elusive.
Pseudomonas plecoglossicida is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium with polar flagella. It is a pathogen causing childhood pneumonia and fish metabolic dysregulation [8,9]. The deficiency of flagella impaired P. plecoglossicida’s swarming motility, chemotaxis, adhesion, and biofilm formation [10]. Dynamic monitoring revealed flagellum-related genes were significantly upregulated post-infection [11]. In addition, the flagellum not only regulated immune pathways such as complement activation and immune effector processes but also interfered with metabolic functions [12]. However, the mechanism by which the P. plecoglossicida’s flagellum disrupted the host TCA cycle remains unclear.
This study will construct a fliC (ACRRS2_09385)-deficient mutant strain (ΔfliC) of P. plecoglossicida. By comparing it with the wild-type strain (WT), we aim to elucidate the molecular mechanism through which bacterial flagella interfere with host energy metabolism, thereby advancing our understanding of flagellar biology.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

The P. plecoglossicida NZBD9 strain was stored at −80 °C in the laboratory. The fliC deletion mutant (ΔfliC) was constructed using a markerless knockout method as described by He [10]. Briefly, homology arms flanking the target fliC gene region were amplified using primers P1-P4 (Supplementary Table S1) and cloned into the suicide vector pK18mobSacB via seamless cloning. The resulting knockout plasmid was transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells. Subsequently, the plasmid was extracted and electroporated into prepared P. plecoglossicida competent cells. The ΔfliC strain was selected using neomycin resistance and sucrose counter-selection. Successful deletion was confirmed by PCR using verification primers P5/P6 (Supplementary Table S1) and sequencing performed by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China), which verified the complete deletion of the fliC gene in strain NZBD9.

2.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy

The wild-type and ΔfliC strains were cultured overnight at 18 °C, then centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 8 min at 4 °C. The bacterial pellet was resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove the culture medium, and this process was repeated twice. Using a pipette, 20 μL of the bacterial suspension was placed on a carbon-coated copper grid for 3 min, followed by removal of excess liquid with filter paper. A total of 2% phosphotungstic acid solution was applied to the grid for 1 min, excess liquid was removed with filter paper, and the grid was air-dried at room temperature. The sample was observed under a transmission electron microscope, and images were captured for analysis.

2.3. Determination of Growth Curve

The NZBD9 strain and ∆fliC strain of P. plecoglossicida were cultured in LB broth at 18 °C with shaking at 220 rpm/min overnight and then diluted with sterile LB broth to OD600 = 0.28 ± 0.01. Aliquots of 20 µL bacterial suspension and 180 µL LB broth were added to a 96-well plate. There were 12 replicates for each strain, and 200 µL of LB broth with 12 wells used for the control group. The OD value at 600 nm was measured at 18 °C with a multifunctional microtiter plate detector (every 30 min for 48 h).

2.4. Animal Experiments

Large yellow croakers were purchased from a farm in Ningde, China, with an average body weight of 150 ± 6.7 g. After acclimatization for 14 days in a recirculating seawater system at 18 ± 1 °C, the fish were used for infection experiments. During the acclimatization period, fish were fed once daily to satiation. Both bacterial strains were cultured overnight in LB broth at 18 °C, with shaking at 220 rpm. Cultures were centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 10 min, and the bacterial pellets were resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). This washing step was repeated twice to remove residual culture medium. The bacterial suspension was adjusted with PBS to an infection dose of 5 × 104 CFU per fish. Each fish was intraperitoneally injected with 200 μL of the bacterial suspension or sterile PBS.
A total of 180 fish were utilized for the survival assay, with 60 fish per independent experiment, and the trial was repeated three times. For each experiment, 60 fish were randomly assigned and evenly distributed into three groups (n = 20 per group): wild-type infection group (WT group), ΔfliC infection group (ΔfliC group), and PBS injection group (control group). The WT and ΔfliC groups were administered the respective bacterial strains at a dose of 5 × 104 CFU per fish, whereas the control group received an equivalent volume of PBS. Mortality was monitored and recorded daily, with deceased fish being immediately removed from the tank. The experimental period spanned 10 days.
Additionally, 270 fish were randomly allocated into three experimental sets (n = 90 per set), designated for microscope observation, metabolic parameter measurement, and high-throughput sequencing, respectively. Within each set, 90 fish were further evenly divided into three subgroups: the control group, WT group, and ΔfliC group, each receiving injections as previously described. Liver samples were collected from control and moribund fish in infected groups for subsequent experimental analyses (moribund fish were defined as those showing symptoms such as surfacing, and cessation of swimming with continued opercular movement after infection with the half-lethal dose), with a minimum of three biological replicates obtained per subgroup.

2.5. Microscope Observation

For histopathologic observation, part of the samples was dehydrated in a 70–100% ethanol gradient, then transparent in xylene, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 4 μm sections with a Leica microtome (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany). Sections were dewaxed, stained with hematoxylin, rinsed with ultrapure water, dehydrated through an ethanol gradient, and counterstained with 0.5% eosin solution. Another set of sections was dewaxed and stained using a PAS staining kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, sections were alternately stained with PAS solution C and PAS solution B for 15 min each, rinsed with pure water, stained with PAS solution A in the dark for 30 min, rinsed with pure water for 5 min, and finally dehydrated through a gradient series. Subsequently, the sections were transparent through xylene and sealed with neutral gum. After drying, the slides were observed and photographed using a Leica microscope. For vacuolated cell quantification, 10 randomly selected fields of view (FOVs) were examined to count vacuolated cells within each field. For PAS-staining grayscale analysis, the mean grayscale value of PAS staining was measured and statistically analyzed across 10 additional randomly selected FOVs.
For ultramicrostructure observation, the approach was followed Sun [13]. Briefly, 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 15 min, thrice; 50% ethanol for 15 min; 70% ethanol for 15 min; 80% ethanol for 15 min; 90% ethanol for 15 min; 95% ethanol for 15 min; 100% ethanol for 15 min, twice; acetone/epon-812 = 1:1 overnight; 60 °C 48 h; sliced; 2% uranyl acetate for 15 min; and lead citrate for 15 min, dried at room temperature overnight.

2.6. Metabolic Parameter Measurement

The following kits were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions to measure respective parameters in the livers of the three groups of large yellow croakers: Cell Mitochondrial Complex V (F0F1-ATPase/ATP Synthase) Activity Assay Kit (Elabscience, Wuhan, China); Amplex Red Triglyceride Assay Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China); Lipid Peroxidation Assay Kit (Nanjing Jiancheng, Nanjing, China); Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Activity Assay Kit (Elabscience, Wuhan, China); GSH and GSSG Assay Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China); Enhanced NAD+/NADH Assay Kit with WST-8 (Beyotime, Shanghai, China); and Liver Glycogen Assay Kit (Nanjing Jiancheng, Nanjing, China). The parameters measured included ATP Synthase Complex V activity; LDH specific activity; lipid peroxide content; Triacylglyceride content; total GSH content; liver glycogen content; and the ratio of NAD+/NADH.

2.7. qRT-PCR Analysis for Transcription of Immune-Related Genes

The total RNA of each sample was extracted from the infected large yellow croaker tissues according to the manufacturer’s instructions of TransZol Up Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The cDNA was obtained using TransScript® One-Step gDNA Removal cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). β-actin gene was used as the internal reference gene for this work. The mRNA relative expression level of target genes was calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method [14]. Primer sequences of genes used in this work are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.8. Proteomics Analysis

After adding protein lysis buffer, samples were homogenized three times, followed by 30 min of low-temperature sonication. Supernatants were collected by centrifugation, with protein concentration determined by BCA assay and analyzed via SDS-PAGE electrophoresis [15]. A total of 100 μg protein was reacted with 100 mM TEAB and 10 mM TCEP, followed by 40 min reaction with 40 mM iodoacetamide. Acetone-precipitated samples were centrifuged, dissolved, and digested. Peptides were vacuum concentrated [16]. Samples were redissolved in 0.1% TFA, desalted via HLB cartridges, vacuum concentrated, and finally quantified using a NanoDrop One UV spectrophotometer (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) [17].
Peptides were separated by Vanquish Neo LC system and analyzed on Orbitrap Astral MS, with data acquired using Thermo Xcalibur 4.7 [18,19]. DIA mode (100–1700 m/z) was used. Raw data were processed with Spectronaut™ 19 (large yellow croaker database) for bioinformatic analysis [20]. GO and KEGG pathway analyses were performed for functional clustering of differentially expressed proteins, and R language t-test was used to calculate the significance (p value) and fold change between groups [21,22].

2.9. Drawings and Statistical Analysis

Adobe Illustrator(version 2024) (San Jose, CA, USA) were used for drawings. The data were shown as means ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed with two-way ANOVA, followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test using the analysis tool available in the Graphpad Prism software (version 8.0.1). p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Details of the software and database used in this work are shown in Supplementary Table S2.

3. Results

3.1. fliC Contributed to the Pathogenesis of P. plecoglossicida

The fliC gene encodes the bacterial flagellar filament. PCR and sequencing results confirmed the successful deletion of fliC from the genome of the WT (Figure 1A); gyrB was used as the reference gene for PCR amplification to verify the successful construction of the ∆fliC mutant [23]. Transmission electron microscopy showed the absence of the flagella in the ΔfliC strain (Figure 1B). In vitro, the growth rate of the WT and ΔfliC showed no significant difference (Figure 1C), which indicated that deletion of the fliC did not impair the growth of P. plecoglossicida. Large yellow croakers were challenged with the WT or ΔfliC at a dose of 5 × 104 colony-forming units (cfu)/fish. The mortality of the WT group occurred at 3 days post-infection (dpi), with a final survival rate of 0%, and the mortality of the ΔfliC group occurred at 4 dpi, with a final survival rate of 35%, and no mortality occurred in the control group (Figure 1D). The result indicated that fliC contributed to the pathogenesis of P. plecoglossicida. Compared to the control group, the livers of infected croakers were paler and friable; however, the WT group was more severe than the ΔfliC group (Figure 1E). These results demonstrated that the fliC is not only involved in the pathogenesis to large yellow croakers but also associated with the liver damage of large yellow croakers.

3.2. fliC Disrupted Energy Metabolism in Large Yellow Croaker Livers

The pathological results showed that hepatocytes in the control group were relatively well-organized without significant lesions (Figure 2A), whereas varying degrees of vacuolar degeneration and inflammatory cell infiltration were observed both in the WT (Figure 2B) and ΔfliC groups (Figure 2C). Notably, the ΔfliC group showed a 29.54% reduction in the vacuolated cell count compared to the WT (Supplementary Figure S1), indicating fliC involvement in the P. plecoglossicida-induced disruption of the hepatic energy metabolism. In addition, infection caused a reduction in liver glycogen. Compared with the control group, the ΔfliC group decreased by 32.70%, while the WT group was more severe, decreasing by 83.53% (Figure 2D–G). The results indicated that fliC participated in interfering with glucose metabolism. On the other hand, the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum were intact in the control group. In the WT group, the cristae of both endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria disappeared (Figure 2I). In the ΔfliC group, the cristae of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria were fractured (Figure 2J). What is more, infection caused a decrease in mitochondrial complex V activity and the NAD+/NADH ratio, reduced glutathione levels, and caused an increase in lipid peroxides. However, the ΔfliC group was better than the WT group (Figure 2K–N). These results suggested that fliC contributed to P. plecoglossicida-induced energy metabolism dysregulation.

3.3. Proteomics Analysis of Large Yellow Croaker Livers

To comprehensively characterize the fliC-mediated disruption of the energy metabolism, livers from large yellow croakers infected with WT or ∆fliC were examined. Compared to the WT group, the ΔfliC group had 562 differentially expressed proteins, among which 183 proteins were significantly upregulated, and 379 proteins were significantly downregulated (Figure 3A). All differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were reproducible across biological replicates (Figure 3B).
A GO enrichment analysis revealed that the following functions were most significantly affected by fliC: complement activation, humoral immune response, immune effector process, activation of immune response, positive regulation of immune response, response to biotic stimulus, and positive regulation of immune system process (Figure 4A). Red circles denote upregulated DEPs within the terms; blue circles denote downregulated DEPs. To further illustrate the GO enrichment levels, a multi-dimensional circle plot was generated based on the DEPs and GO enrichment results (Figure 4B). Notably, these GO terms were predominantly enriched in downregulated proteins, with the exception of “response to biotic stimulus” (GO:0009607), which contained one upregulated protein. This pattern suggested that fliC triggered an immune activation in large yellow croakers. Concurrently, the KEGG pathway analysis revealed the following pathways as most significantly impacted by fliC: oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, AMPK signaling pathway, cholesterol metabolism, glycosaminoglycan degradation, tryptophan metabolism, inositol phosphate metabolism, fat digestion and absorption, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum, nitrogen metabolism, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, and complement and coagulation cascades (Figure 4C). Unexpectedly, both the complement and coagulation cascades and central carbohydrate metabolism pathways were significantly enriched. Notably, the complement cascade also participated in immune-related pathways (Figure 4D). A KEGG analysis indicated that fliC actively contributed to the disruption of complement-mediated immunity and carbohydrate metabolism pathway regulation.

3.4. fliC May Trigger Immune and Metabolic Dysregulation Through Tlr5 Signaling

To dissect the mechanism of fliC-mediated dysregulation in carbohydrate metabolism pathways, we quantified the expression of pivotal regulatory genes governing these processes.
Additionally, to investigate the abovementioned immune responses and metabolic pathways following infection, we conducted a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of 15 key genes involved in immune regulation, iron homeostasis, lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, and metabolic signaling. The gene patterns that were analyzed are Tlr5, C3, Tnfα, Il1β, Hepcidin, Acox1, Cpt1a, Mrc1, Pparα, Sod1, Cat, Gclc, Hmgcs2, Pck1, and Sirt1 (Figure 5). The complement component C3 was downregulated, indicating the suppression of the complement pathway. Similarly, pro-inflammatory cytokine genes Tnfα and Il1β were downregulated, alongside Tlr5, suggesting a subdued immune activation in the ΔfliC group. Conversely, genes involved in fatty acid β-oxidation and mitochondrial fatty acid transport—Acox1, Cpt1a, and Pparα—were significantly upregulated, indicating an enhanced lipid catabolism. Oxidative stress-related genes Sod1 and Cat, as well as the glutathione synthesis enzyme Gclc, were downregulated, reflecting alterations in the redox balance. Furthermore, genes associated with gluconeogenesis (Pck1) and ketogenesis (Hmgcs2) were suppressed. Notably, the energy sensor Sirt1, which links immune regulation to metabolic pathways, was upregulated in the ΔfliC group. These results indicated that fliC may trigger a Tnfα/Il1β cytokine storm through tlr5, thereby interfering with carbohydrate metabolism (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Upon pathogenic challenge, the host initiates metabolic reprogramming to fuel immune responses [24]. Conversely, to prevent the pathogen exploitation of nutrients, the host employs nutritional immunity by sequestering or expelling energy substrates [25]. Regardless, infection inevitably disrupts metabolic homeostasis and drives its restructuring. P. plecoglossicida induces a cytokine storm in large yellow croakers [11]. The flagella serve as one of the inflammatory triggers. For instance, Salmonella Typhi flagella activated the host TLR5-mediated innate immunity, and their deletion not only alleviated inflammation or downregulated inflammatory markers such as TNF-α/IL-1β [26] but also reduced virulence. In the case of P. plecoglossicida, fliC deletion led to attenuated virulence (Figure 1D) and alleviated inflammation (Figure 5).
The activation of inflammation by fliC may be driven by Tlr5, a member of the Toll-like receptor family that specifically recognizes the flagella and transmits signals to activate downstream immune responses [27]. In severe cases, this TLR5-driven immune response may become dysregulated, leading to tissue damage [28]. This excessive inflammatory response also consumes substantial amounts of energy, thereby imposing an increased burden on mitochondria and causing mitochondrial injury [29]. More critically, mitochondria operating at full capacity generate vast quantities of ROS. When the sheer volume of ROS surpasses the neutralization capacity of limited antioxidants such as glutathione (GSH), indiscriminate attacks on host cellular components occur, further exacerbating inflammation [30]. Concurrently, the elevated expression of Sod1, Cat, and Gclc signifies the formation of an antioxidant enzymatic consortium comprising superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutamate–cysteine ligase (GCL) (Figure 6). This consortium not only directly contributes to mitigating inflammation but also buys crucial time for the large yellow croaker to mount more effective countermeasures.
Notably, an important consideration arising from our findings is whether the attenuated pathogenicity of the ΔfliC strain and its reduced impact on host liver metabolism are primarily due to the loss of flagellum-mediated motility or the absence of fliC-specific TLR5 signaling. It is well-established that flagellar motility is critical for bacterial colonization, host invasion, and biofilm formation [1,2]. Therefore, the impaired motility of the ΔfliC mutant likely contributes to its reduced virulence by diminishing its ability to effectively reach and colonize host tissues. The significant downregulation of the TLR5/NF-κB pathway (Tlr5, Tnfα, and Il1β), the altered regulation of complement cascades, and the concomitant mitigation of metabolic dysregulation in the ΔfliC group collectively suggest that the immunomodulatory role of the fliC protein itself is a major driver of the observed immunometabolic reprogramming. Although the two mechanisms—loss of motility and loss of TLR5 signaling—are not mutually exclusive and may operate synergistically, our results suggest that the hyperactivation of pro-inflammatory immunity via the fliC-TLR5 interaction may exacerbate metabolic perturbations independent of the consequences of reduced bacterial motility. Our study underscores that the flagellum is not only a motility organelle but also a key immunometabolic regulator in P. plecoglossicida pathogenesis.
An activated immune state is highly energy demanding [31]. Here, we observed that the hepatic energy metabolism in the ∆fliC group was significantly healthier compared to the WT group (Figure 2D–F). This metabolic shift was not solely attributable to mitochondrial damage but also potentially linked to modulated inflammation. For instance, the TLR5-TNFα signaling axis indirectly regulates insulin receptor substrates (IRSs); their downregulated expression suggested the potential impairment of the insulin signaling pathway (Figure 2G) [32]. Concurrently, the activation of PCK1 (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase) contributed to maintaining blood glucose levels (Figure 5N) [33]. Furthermore, the upregulation of PPARα, ACOX1, and CPT1A promoted the accumulation of acetyl-CoA derived from enhanced β-oxidation (Figure 5F,G,I) [34]. Excess acetyl-CoA exerted feedback inhibition on pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), thereby suppressing both glycolysis and the TCA cycle [35]. Through this coordinated multisystem interplay between immunity and metabolism, the large yellow croaker exhibited enhanced resistance to the ∆fliC infection.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that the fliC-encoded flagellin mediates P. plecoglossicida’s disruption of the core pathways governing inflammatory immunity and glucose metabolism in the large yellow croaker. This disruption involved pathological processes including glycogen depletion and mitochondrial damage. Deletion of the fliC gene resulted in a significant 30% reduction in bacterial virulence. Furthermore, these results elucidate the mechanisms by which the fliC mediated bacterial pathogenicity and provide novel insights into the regulatory networks linking infection-induced immune responses and metabolic reprogramming.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox14101189/s1, Figure S1: Quantitative differences in vacuolated cells, ***, p < 0.01; Table S1: The sequence of primers for qRT-PCR; and Table S2: Software and database information.

Author Contributions

X.P. and Y.S. are co-first authors of this article. X.P.: Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing—original draft. Y.S.: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing—review and editing. H.T.: Investigation, Validation, Writing—review and editing. H.P.: Investigation, Validation, Writing—review and editing. C.Z.: Investigation, Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing—review and editing. Q.Y.: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Fund Program of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Disease Control and Healthy culture (Grant No. PBEA2024YB02); the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Grant No. 2024J08192); the Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province (Grant No. 52102110048); National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32403079).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Jimei University (Acceptance No. JMU202403021, 2025.1.1-2027.12.31).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere thanks for the assistance from the personnel of teams.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Patrick, J.E.; Kearns, D.B. Swarming motility and the control of master regulators of flagellar biosynthesis. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 83, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Akahoshi, D.T.; Bevins, C.L. Flagella at the host-microbe interface: Key functions intersect with redundant responses. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 828758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Andersen-Nissen, E.; Smith, K.D.; Strobe, K.L.; Barrett, S.L.R.; Cookson, B.T.; Logan, S.M.; Aderem, A. Evasion of Toll- like receptor 5 by flagellated bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9247–9252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xi, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, L.; Xiu, F.; Yi, X.; Chen, H.; You, X. Sneaky Tactics: Ingenious Immune Evasion Mechanisms of Bartonella. Virulence 2024, 15, 2322961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seok, W.-S.; Ji, Y.J.; Kim, B.-N.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, T.-H.; Kim, S.J. A conserved TLR5 binding and activation hot spot on flagellin. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhattacharyya, S.; Walker, D.M.; Harshey, R.M. Flagellar motility is mutagenic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2412541121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kidane, D.T.; Mehari, Y.T.; Rice, F.C.; Arivett, B.A.; Gunderson, J.H.; Farone, A.L.; Farone, M.B. The inside scoop: Comparative genomics of two intranuclear bacteria, “Candidatus Berkiella cookevillensis” and “Candidatus Berkiella aquae”. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0278206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lin, Y.; Zhang, C.; Tan, N.; Zhao, J.; Yang, H.; Zhang, L. Is it a potential pneumonia pathogen in Pseudomonas putida group? First isolation and identification of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida in clinic and a comparison of pathogenicity with Pseudomonas putida. Microb. Pathog. 2024, 196, 106910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Guan, L.; Song, X.; Jiang, B.; Mo, Z. An outbreak of visceral white nodules disease caused by Pseudomonas plecoglossicida at a water temperature of 12 °C in cultured large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) in China. J. Fish Dis. 2020, 43, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, L.; Zhao, L.M.; Li, Q.; Huang, L.L.; Huang, X.H.; Mo, Z.L.; Li, A.X. Pseudomonas plecoglossicida fliP gene affects the immune response of Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂ to infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2023, 140, 108971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, L.; Hu, Y.; Wang, H.; Lin, L.; Gao, X.; Mo, Z.; Li, A. Mechanistic insight into the roles of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida clpV gene in host-pathogen interactions with Larimichthys crocea by dual RNA-seq. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 93, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alvarado, A.; Behrens, W.; Josenhans, C. Protein Activity Sensing in Bacteria in Regulating Metabolism and Motility. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Weng, S.; Li, C.; Huang, Z.; Guo, C.; Lin, Y.; Huang, X.; Li, A. Characterization of a highly lethal barramundi (Lates calcarifer) model of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida infection. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 149, 104516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-ΔΔCT) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, Y.; Yu, S.; Liu, S.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Bai, Y.; Liu, H.; Cao, Y. Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics Unravels the Effects of Iron Ions on Coronatine Synthesis in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, T.; Zhu, Y.; Xuan, Y.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X.; Zheng, M.; Cai, Z.; Zhao, X.; Liu, T.; Li, M.; et al. DPHL: A DIA Pan-human Protein Mass Spectrometry Library for Robust Biomarker Discovery. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2020, 18, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, M.; Deng, J.; Xu, K.; Yao, T.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Bai, F.; Wang, W.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, X. In-depth serum proteomics reveals biomarkers of psoriasis severity and response to traditional Chinese medicine. Theranostics 2019, 9, 2475–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guzmán, U.H.; Martinez-Val, A.; Ye, Z.; Damoc, E.; Teucher, N.; Arrey, T.N.; Kretschmer, A.; Vorobyev, A.; Hetzer, C.; Weise, S.; et al. Narrow-window DIA: Ultra-fast quantitative analysis of comprehensive proteomes with high sequencing depth. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lou, R.; Shui, W. Acquisition and Analysis of DIA-Based Proteomic Data: A Comprehensive Survey in 2023. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2024, 23, 100712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stewart, H.I.; Grinfeld, D.; Giannakopulos, A.; Makarov, A.; Denisov, E.; Lai, A.; Horning, S.; Lange, O. Parallelized Acquisition of Orbitrap and Astral Analyzers Enables High-Throughput Quantitative Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 15656–15664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ma, J.; Liu, M.; Wang, Y.; Ning, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Liang, J.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Y. Quantitative proteomics analysis of young and elderly skin with DIA mass spectrometry reveals new skin aging-related proteins. Aging 2020, 12, 13529–13554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, J.; Ren, Y.; Qian, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Zhao, W.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, S.; Zeng, H.; et al. Majorbio Cloud 2024: Update single-cell and multiomics workflows. iMeta 2024, 3, e217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Izumi, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Suzuki, K.; Shimizu, A.; Aranishi, F. Identification and detection of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida isolates with PCR primers targeting the gyrB region. J. Fish Dis. 2007, 30, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. O’Neill, L.A.J.; Kishton, R.J.; Rathmell, J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 553–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cassat, J.E.; Skaar, E.P. Iron in infection and immunity. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 13, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, W.; Chen, X.; Pan, H.; Li, S.; Huang, H.; Ni, B.; Chen, H.; Wu, Q.; Liu, H.; Wu, H.; et al. Host acid signal controls Salmonella flagella biogenesis through CadC-YdiV axis. Gut Microbes 2022, 14, 2146979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rumbo, M.; Nempont, C.; Kraehenbuhl, J.-P.; Sirard, J.-C. Mucosal interplay among commensal and pathogenic bacteria: Lessons from flagellin and Toll-like receptor 5. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 2976–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carvalho, F.A.; Aitken, J.D.; Vijay-Kumar, M.; Gewirtz, A.T. TLR5 activation induces secretory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (sIL-1Ra) and reduces inflammasome-associated tissue damage. Mucosal Immunol. 2011, 4, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lacourt, T.E.; Vichaya, E.G.; Chiu, G.S.; Dantzer, R.; Heijnen, C.J. The High Costs of Low-Grade Inflammation: Persistent Fatigue as a Consequence of Reduced Cellular-Energy Availability and Non-adaptive Energy Expenditure. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, T.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, J. Imbalanced GSH/ROS and sequential cell death. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2022, 36, e22942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Straub, R.H. Insulin resistance, selfish brain, and selfish immune system: An evolutionarily positively selected program used in chronic inflammatory diseases. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16 (Suppl. S2), S4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hotamisligil, G.S.; Peraldi, P.; Budavari, A.; Ellis, R.; White, M.F.; Spiegelman, B.M. IRS-1-Mediated Inhibition of Insulin Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Activity in TNF-α- and Obesity-Induced Insulin Resistance. Science 1996, 271, 665–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hanson, R.W.; Hakimi, P. Born to run; the story of the PEPCK-Cmus mouse. Biochimie 2008, 90, 838–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Reddy, J.K.; Hashimoto, T. Peroxisomal beta-oxidation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha: An adaptive metabolic system. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2001, 21, 193–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Martínez-Reyes, I.; Chandel, N.S. Mitochondrial TCA cycle metabolites control physiology and disease. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The fliC gene contributed to the pathogenesis of P. plecoglossicida. (A): Construction of P. plecoglossicidafliC mutant strain. (B): Electron microscopy of WT and ∆fliC; arrows indicate the flagella of the WT strain. (C): In vitro growth kinetics of WT and ∆fliC. (D): Survival rates of large yellow croakers infected with WT or ∆fliC. (E): Livers of moribund large yellow croakers infected with WT or ∆fliC.
Figure 1. The fliC gene contributed to the pathogenesis of P. plecoglossicida. (A): Construction of P. plecoglossicidafliC mutant strain. (B): Electron microscopy of WT and ∆fliC; arrows indicate the flagella of the WT strain. (C): In vitro growth kinetics of WT and ∆fliC. (D): Survival rates of large yellow croakers infected with WT or ∆fliC. (E): Livers of moribund large yellow croakers infected with WT or ∆fliC.
Antioxidants 14 01189 g001
Figure 2. fliC involved in disruption of energy metabolism in large yellow croaker livers. (AF): Hepatic histopathological features. (AC): HE staining. Arrows indicate vacuolar degeneration cells; asterisk indicated infiltrating inflammatory cells. (DF): PAS staining; (A,D): control group; (B,E): WT group; and (C,F): ΔfliC group. (HJ): Hepatic ultrastructural features of livers. (H): control group. (I): WT group. (J): ΔfliC group. Arrows indicate mitochondria, asterisk indicates endoplasmic reticulum. (G,KN): livers of large yellow croaker’s liver glycogen (G), total liver ATP synthase complex activity (K), the ratio of NAD+/NADH (L), total liver GSH (M), and total liver lipid peroxide (N) were determined. ns: not significant. ***: p < 0.01.
Figure 2. fliC involved in disruption of energy metabolism in large yellow croaker livers. (AF): Hepatic histopathological features. (AC): HE staining. Arrows indicate vacuolar degeneration cells; asterisk indicated infiltrating inflammatory cells. (DF): PAS staining; (A,D): control group; (B,E): WT group; and (C,F): ΔfliC group. (HJ): Hepatic ultrastructural features of livers. (H): control group. (I): WT group. (J): ΔfliC group. Arrows indicate mitochondria, asterisk indicates endoplasmic reticulum. (G,KN): livers of large yellow croaker’s liver glycogen (G), total liver ATP synthase complex activity (K), the ratio of NAD+/NADH (L), total liver GSH (M), and total liver lipid peroxide (N) were determined. ns: not significant. ***: p < 0.01.
Antioxidants 14 01189 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of differentially expressed proteins in livers of large yellow croakers infected with WT and ΔfliC. The volcano plot (A) and heatmap (B) of differentially expressed proteins in livers of large yellow croakers infected with the WT or ΔfliC.
Figure 3. Analysis of differentially expressed proteins in livers of large yellow croakers infected with WT and ΔfliC. The volcano plot (A) and heatmap (B) of differentially expressed proteins in livers of large yellow croakers infected with the WT or ΔfliC.
Antioxidants 14 01189 g003
Figure 4. Comparative proteomics analysis between the livers of large yellow croakers infected with WT and ΔfliC. (A,B): GO enrichment analysis related to immune response. (C): KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for differentially expressed proteins. (D): Sankey diagram illustrating interactions of the complement component family with enriched pathways.
Figure 4. Comparative proteomics analysis between the livers of large yellow croakers infected with WT and ΔfliC. (A,B): GO enrichment analysis related to immune response. (C): KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for differentially expressed proteins. (D): Sankey diagram illustrating interactions of the complement component family with enriched pathways.
Antioxidants 14 01189 g004
Figure 5. Relative expression levels of immunometabolic genes in the livers of large yellow croakers infected with WT and ΔfliC. (A) C3 (complement component 3), (B) Tlr5 (Toll-like receptor 5), (C) Tnfα (tumor necrosis factor-alpha), (D) Il1β (interleukin-1 beta), (E) Hepcidin (iron-regulatory antimicrobial peptide), (F) Acox1 (acyl-CoA oxidase 1), (G) Cpt1a (carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A), (H) Mrc1 (macrophage mannose receptor 1), (I) Pparα (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha), (J) Sod1 (superoxide dismutase 1), (K) Cat (catalase), (L) Gclc (glutamate–cysteine ligase catalytic subunit), (M) Hmgcs2 (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 2), (N) Pck1 (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1), and (O) Sirt1 (sirtuin 1). All values are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3. Significant differences between the WT and ΔfliC groups are indicated by asterisks: *, p < 0.1; **, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.01.
Figure 5. Relative expression levels of immunometabolic genes in the livers of large yellow croakers infected with WT and ΔfliC. (A) C3 (complement component 3), (B) Tlr5 (Toll-like receptor 5), (C) Tnfα (tumor necrosis factor-alpha), (D) Il1β (interleukin-1 beta), (E) Hepcidin (iron-regulatory antimicrobial peptide), (F) Acox1 (acyl-CoA oxidase 1), (G) Cpt1a (carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A), (H) Mrc1 (macrophage mannose receptor 1), (I) Pparα (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha), (J) Sod1 (superoxide dismutase 1), (K) Cat (catalase), (L) Gclc (glutamate–cysteine ligase catalytic subunit), (M) Hmgcs2 (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 2), (N) Pck1 (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1), and (O) Sirt1 (sirtuin 1). All values are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3. Significant differences between the WT and ΔfliC groups are indicated by asterisks: *, p < 0.1; **, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.01.
Antioxidants 14 01189 g005
Figure 6. Putative schematic diagram illustrating fliC-triggered immune and metabolic dysregulation through Tlr5 signaling. The “↑” denotes upregulation of genes or proteins. while the cross symbol denotes the halting of synthesis. The “×” indicates down regulation of genes or proteins. The “⭙” indicates the metabolic pathway is blocked.
Figure 6. Putative schematic diagram illustrating fliC-triggered immune and metabolic dysregulation through Tlr5 signaling. The “↑” denotes upregulation of genes or proteins. while the cross symbol denotes the halting of synthesis. The “×” indicates down regulation of genes or proteins. The “⭙” indicates the metabolic pathway is blocked.
Antioxidants 14 01189 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, X.; Sun, Y.; Tan, H.; Pang, H.; Zhao, C.; Yan, Q. fliC Mediates Pseudomonas plecoglossicida’s Hijack of Inflammatory Immunity and Glucose Metabolism in the Large Yellow Croaker. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14101189

AMA Style

Peng X, Sun Y, Tan H, Pang H, Zhao C, Yan Q. fliC Mediates Pseudomonas plecoglossicida’s Hijack of Inflammatory Immunity and Glucose Metabolism in the Large Yellow Croaker. Antioxidants. 2025; 14(10):1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14101189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Xizhi, Yujia Sun, Huanjiao Tan, Huanying Pang, Caiyuan Zhao, and Qingpi Yan. 2025. "fliC Mediates Pseudomonas plecoglossicida’s Hijack of Inflammatory Immunity and Glucose Metabolism in the Large Yellow Croaker" Antioxidants 14, no. 10: 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14101189

APA Style

Peng, X., Sun, Y., Tan, H., Pang, H., Zhao, C., & Yan, Q. (2025). fliC Mediates Pseudomonas plecoglossicida’s Hijack of Inflammatory Immunity and Glucose Metabolism in the Large Yellow Croaker. Antioxidants, 14(10), 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14101189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop