Next Article in Journal
An Intercellular Flow of Glutathione Regulated by Interleukin 6 Links Astrocytes and the Liver in the Pathophysiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Previous Article in Journal
Low Dietary n6/n3 Ratio Attenuates Changes in the NRF 2 Gene Expression, Lipid Peroxidation, and Inflammatory Markers Induced by Fructose Overconsumption in the Rat Abdominal Adipose Tissue
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/antiox10122006
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidants into Nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica), Important Inhibitors of Free Radicals’ Formation

by
Romina Castañeda-Arriaga
1,
Adriana Perez-Gonzalez
2,
Tiziana Marino
3,*,
Nino Russo
3 and
Annia Galano
1
1
Departamento de Química, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Vicentina, Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico 09340, Mexico
2
CONACYT-Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa, San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Vicentina, Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico 09340, Mexico
3
Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie Chimiche, Universitaà della Calabria, I-87036 Arcavacata di Rende, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(12), 2006; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10122006
Submission received: 6 November 2021 / Revised: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 12 December 2021 / Published: 16 December 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nopal (Opuntia ficus indica) belonging to the Cactacea family has many nutritional benefits attributed to a wide variety of phenolic and flavonoid compounds. Coumaric acid (COA), ferulic acid (FLA), protocatechuic acid (PRA), and gallic acid (GAA) are the phenolic acids (PhAs) present in nopal. In this study, the role of these PhAs in copper-induced oxidative stress was investigated using the density functional theory (DFT). The PhAs form 5 thermodynamically favorable complexes with Cu(II), their conditional Gibbs free energies of reaction (ΔG’, at pH = 7.4, in kcal/mol) are from −23 kcal/mol to −18 kcal/mol. All of them are bi-dentate complexes. The complexes of PRA and GAA are capable of inhibiting the Cu(II) reduction by both O2•− and Asc−, their reactions with the chelated metal are endergonic having rate constants about ~10−5–102 M−1 s−1, PhAs can prevent the formation of hydroxyl free radicals by chelating the copper ions. Once the hydroxyl radicals are formed by Fenton reactions, the complexes of PhAs with Cu(II) can immediately react with them, thus inhibiting the damage that they can cause to molecules of biological interest. The reactions between PhAs-Cu(II) complexes and hydroxyl free radical were estimated to be diffusion-limited (~108 M−1s−1). Thus, these chelates can reduce the harmful effects caused by the most reactive free radical existent immediately after it is formed by Fenton reactions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Several diseases are caused by oxidative stress (OS) such as cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, pulmonary and renal failures, cardiovascular diseases and neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, multiple sclerosis, and memory loss [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. OS is caused by an excess in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the inability of the body to remove such excess. The imbalance between production and consumption of ROS can severely damage cells or molecules of biological interest such as proteins or DNA [11,12]. Therefore, to preserve human health, it is important to find efficient strategies to attenuate the OS-induced molecular damage. In addition to enzymatic defense systems, chemical antioxidants arising from plant extracts containing phenolic and flavonoid compounds are a viable tool to achieve that purpose.
Nopal (Opuntia ficus indica) is part of the Cactacea family. This plant grows wildly in arid and semi-arid regions in America and Europe. The tender young part of the cactus stem, or cladode, is frequently consumed as a vegetable in salads, while the nopal fruit is consumed as a fresh fruit. The fruit and cladodes of nopal have nutritional benefits attributed to their antioxidant properties and the pharmacological activity of their compounds [13,14,15]. Consumption of nopal has been recommended for the treatment of some diseases like diabetes mellitus, blood glucose levels, hyperlipidemia, obesity and gastrointestinal disorders, and neuronal injury [16,17,18,19] Nopal is a valuable source of nutrients [20] as well as antiulcerogenic [21,22], antioxidant [19,20,23,24,25] anticancer [23], neuroprotective [26], hepatoprotective [27], and antiproliferative [28] compounds.
All parts of the nopal are rich in polyphenolic compounds and phenolic acids (PhAs), as is reported in Figure S1. These compounds are abundant within the plant’s kingdom and human diet. Coumaric acid (COA), ferulic acid (FLA), protocatechuic acid (PRA), and gallic acid (GAA) are PhAs present in nopal [29] (Figure 1). These PhAs, in turn, have numerous beneficial effects on human health including antibacterial [30], anticoagulatory [31], anti-inflammatory [29,32], antihyperglycemic [33], antimutagenic [34,35], antiviral [36,37], cardioprotective [38] and neuroprotective [39] activities.
Chemical composition depends on the cactus variety, maturation stage and environmental conditions of the place of origin [40,41]. Different chemical compounds have been found in the nopal, which are distributed in different proportions in its tissues. Cactus fruit contains important amounts of ascorbic acid, vitamin E, carotenoids, phenols, flavonoids, betaxanthin, betacyanin, and amino acids [42,43], while, in its flowers, many flavonoids are present, such as kaempferol and quercetin [44]. Cactus peel and seeds are rich in palmitic acid, oleic acid, and linoleic acid [45]. The cactus cladodes contain vitamins, various flavonoids, particularly quercetin 3-methyl ether, narcissin, gallic acid, and coumaric acid [46,47,48].
The growing interest in phenolic compounds results from their antioxidant potential. For example, COA, FLA, PRA and GAA have shown to have antioxidant activity as peroxyl radicals scavengers [49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. They react with the hydroperoxyl radical (•OOH) at rate constants of 105–108 M–1 s–1 in aqueous solution and at physiological pH, which indicates that, as free radical scavengers, they are better than Trolox, which is a reference compound [56,57,58].
In addition to its free radical scavenging activity, some phenolic compounds can prevent the formation of OS in the presence of redox metals such as iron or copper. These metals participate in Fenton-type reactions generating hydroxyl radicals (•OH) that are a highly oxidizing species. However, for COA, FLA, PRA and GAA there are not enough data to determine if they could be implicated in preventing the production of •OH radicals. So, the aim of the present investigation was to gain a deeper knowledge on this activity and to provide a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the working mechanisms of COA, FLA, PRA and GAA.

2. Methodology

In the present investigation, the Gaussian 09 package of programs [59] was used. The computational details to study the mechanisms for reactions between the complexes and the hydroxyl free radical are in line with the quantum mechanics-based test for the overall free radical scavenging activity (QM-ORSA) protocol [60]. In the present investigation, all the calculations were carried out inside the framework of the density functional theory (DFT) and, in particular, a Thrular functional M05 [61] was used in conjunction with the basis set of Pople 6-311+G(d,p). To simulate the aqueous environment, the continuum solvent method based on density SMD [62] was considered. SMD can be safely used for estimating solvation free energies for any charged or uncharged solutes, with relatively low errors [59]. The local minima and transition states were identified by 0 and 1 imaginary frequencies, respectively. To verify that the imaginary frequency of each transition state corresponds to the expected motion along the reaction path, the intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations were carried out. Unrestricted calculations were used for the open-shell systems. The energetic values include thermodynamic corrections at 298.15 K.
The conventional transition state theory (TST) [63,64,65] and the 1 M standard state were used to calculate the rate constants, using harmonic vibrational frequencies and Eckart tunneling [66]. For the electron transfer reactions, the Gibbs free energy of activation were calculated using the Marcus theory [67]. In addition, since several of the calculated rate constants (k) are close to the diffusion limit, the apparent rate constant (kapp) cannot be directly obtained from TST calculations. The Collins–Kimball theory is used to that purpose [68], in conjunction with the steady-state Smoluchowski [69] rate constant for an irreversible bimolecular diffusion-controlled reaction, and the Stokes–Einstein [70] approaches for the diffusion coefficient of the reactants.
In the complexes, the Cu (II) ions were modeled coordinated to water molecules, because they are expected to be hydrated in the aqueous phase. This model results to be more adequate to represent ‘‘free’’ copper in biological systems than the corresponding naked ions. Four water molecules were chosen for this purpose, since it was previously reported that the most likely configuration of Cu (II) water complexes, in the aqueous phase, corresponds to an almost square planar four-coordinate geometry [71].

3. Results and Discussion

To determine the molar fractions Mf of each acid-base species, at physiological pH (pH = 7.4), it is important to take into account the pKa values; in Table 1 are reported those for the investigated PhAs. For each PhA, in Figure S2, are the deprotonation routes.
At pH = 7.4 the species with more molar fraction Mf of the investigated PhAs is the mono-anionic species (Hn−1A−), but also the neutral and di-anionic species were taken into account in the present investigation. On the other hand, the molar fractions of tri-anions (Hn−3A−3) and fourth anions (Hn−4A−4) for PRA and GAA are almost negligible.

3.1. Pro-Oxidant Effects by Cu(II) Reduction

A crucial feature for the antioxidant protection, when it takes place in the presence of metal ions, is the reductant capability of the antioxidant, in particular of their deprotonated species. Since the mono-anions of the antioxidants can behave as nucleophilic agents, they can cause the reduction of copper (II) to copper (I) and therefore accelerate the Fenton reactions, thus originating hydroxyl radicals. Such pro-oxidant effects were also explored in this work, considering both PhAs and their corresponding anions (1)–(3). To put the calculated data into perspective, the Cu(II) reductant activity of the investigated PhAs was compared to those of the superoxide radical anion (O2•−), reaction (4), and the ascorbate anion (Asc−), reaction (5). The superoxide anion radical (O2•−) and ascorbate (Asc−) are reducing species at a physiological level, even at an experimental level a mixture of copper-ascorbate is used to provoke redox conditions, and the O2•− is the main reducing species in Fenton reactions; therefore, they are used in the present investigation to analyze the reductant effect against Cu(II).
HnPhAs + Cu(II) → HnPhAs •+ + Cu(I)
Hn−1PhAs− + Cu(II) → Hn−1PhAs • + Cu(I)
Hn−2PhAs2− + Cu(II) → Hn−2PhAs •− + Cu(I)
O2•− + Cu(II) → O2 + Cu(I)
Asc− + Cu(II) → Asc • + Cu(I)
In Table 2 are collected the data referring to the reduction of free Cu(II). To obtain the rate constants, the molar fractions of PhAs, O2•− and Asc− were included at the pH of interest. Taking into account that the reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) by O2•− experimentally occurs at 8.1 × 109 M−1s−1 [75], it can be evinced that the rate constant calculated for that reaction is found to be only 1.74 times lower than the experimentally measured one. This finding supports us on the kinetic data reported and discussed in this work.
At physiological pH, the di-anionic PhAs are predicted to reduce Cu(II) to Cu(I) at significant rates. However, neutral, and mono-anionic acids do not have this pro-oxidant effect since their rate constants are around 10−4 M−1s−1–106 M−1s−1 and the reduction of the metal by O2•− and Asc− occurs at 109 M−1s−1 and 108 M−1s−1, respectively. The PhAs featuring a pro-oxidant effect consist of the di-anion of gallic acid with a rate constant for the Cu(II) reduction of 1.01 × 109 M−1s−1, very closed to that of O2•−, at pH = 7.4. The rate constant for the Cu(II) reduction by di-anions of COA, FLA and PRA are similar to that involving Asc−.

3.2. •OH-Inactivating Ligand Behavior

The possibility that PhAs behave as •OH-inactivating ligand (OIL) [76,77,78] in the presence of redox metal ions also was explored. Such a behavior can be exhibited in two different ways [72]:
OIL−1: by sequestering metal ions from reductants.
OIL−2: by deactivating •OH as they are formed through Fenton-like reactions.
In both cases, OIL molecules should act as metal chelating agents. When they behave as OIL−1 agents, the metal (Cu (II)) is protected by the antioxidant in the complex formed. Thus, initially the Fenton reactions that originate hydroxyl radicals are inhibited.
Furthermore, the antioxidant behaves like OIL−2, when once the hydroxyl radical is formed by Fenton reactions, the complex of PhAs with Cu(II) immediately reacts with the radical, thus behaving as an immediate target and thus protecting other molecules of great interest such as proteins or even DNA.
Chelation was the first aspect explored here since it represents a necessary and crucial step in both cases. Cu(II) ions were modeled coordinated to four water molecules, in a near square-planar configuration and Cu(I) with four explicit water molecules too, in a linear two-coordinate configuration. In this case, in fact, Cu(I) is coordinated only to two water molecules, while the other two are retained in the second coordination shell of the metal ion.
All the possible chelation sites involving O atoms of the examined PhAs were explored, as described in detail in Table S1. In addition, their roles as mono-dentate and bi-dentate ligands have both been considered. Six different chemical routes leading to Cu(II) chelation were investigated. They are:
Route (I): Direct chelation by neutral phenols (HnPhAs):
Cu(H2O)42+ + HnPhAs ⇆ [Cu(H2O)4-j(HnPhAs)]2+ + jH2O
Route (II): Coupled deprotonation-chelation involving neutral phenols (HnPhAs):
Cu(H2O)42+ + HnPhAs ⇆ [Cu(H2O)4-j(Hn−1PhAs)]+ + jH2O + H+
Route (III): Direct chelation by anionic phenols (Hn−1PhAs −):
Cu(H2O)42+ + Hn−1PhAs − ⇆ [Cu(H2O)4-j(Hn−1PhAs)]+ + jH2O
Route (IV): Coupled deprotonation-chelation involving anionic phenols (Hn−1PhAs −):
Cu(H2O)42+ + Hn−1PhAs − ⇆ [Cu(H2O)4-j(Hn−2PhAs)] + jH2O + H+
Route (V): Direct chelation by di-anionic phenols (Hn−2PhAs 2−):
Cu(H2O)42+ + Hn−2PhAs 2− ⇆ [Cu(H2O)4-j(Hn−2PhAs)] + jH2O
Route (VI): Coupled deprotonation-chelation involving di-anionic phenols (Hn−2PhAs 2−):
Cu(H2O)42+ + Hn−2PhAs 2− ⇆ [Cu(H2O)4-j(Hn−3PhAs)]- + jH2O + H+
Table S1 collects all the complexes formed between PhAs and Cu(II) indicating their chelation routes (ChR), chelation sites (ChS), conditional Gibbs free energies of reaction (ΔG’, at pH = 7.4, in kcal/mol), and Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution (%MB) for the different chelation pathways. The corresponding equilibrium constants and Gibbs energies of reaction would explicitly depend on the pH, because the coupled deprotonation-chelation mechanisms (CDCM), i.e., routes II, IV and VI, simultaneously involve Cu(II) chelation and deprotonation of the reactive site in the ligand. Thus, to take this effect into account, the reported data correspond to pH = 7.4. If the complex corresponds to a neutral species and mono-dentate, the label is, for example, HnCOA(1)-Ci, where “i” is the number of the chelate. In addition, if it is from a mono-anionic species and bi-dentate, the label is, for example, Hn−1FLA–(2)-Ci, and so on. Some of these complexes could be formed through two routes; for example, the complex HnCOA(1)-C2 formed by the route II, and the complex Hn−1COA–(1)-C1 formed by the route III, are both the same complex (see Table S1).
Table S1 reports the values of Cu(II) chelation, by all the PhAs present in the nopal, characterized by at least one significantly exergonic pathway. In addition, for COA, PRA and GAA only one main complex is expected, with contributions larger than 98%, i.e., Hn−2COA2– (2)-C2, Hn−2PRA2– (2)-C7 and Hn−2GAA2– (2)-C7. For FLA, two complexes are the most abundant, Hn−2FLA2– (2)-C5 and Hn−2FLA2– (2)-C2, with 81.61% and 18.21%, respectively (Table 3). Therefore, they were the ones that have been explored as antioxidants with the behavior of OIL−1.
To this purpose, two different reductants were considered: the superoxide radical anion (O2•−) and the ascorbate anion (Asc−) (6). Table 4 shows Gibbs free energies of reaction and rate coefficients for the reductant reactions of the PhAs-Cu(II) complexes with the O2•− and Asc−; these are compared with the reaction of Cu(II)(H2O)4 and the same reductants.
PhAs-Cu(II) + O2•−/Asc− → PhAs-Cu(I) + O2/Asc•
The complexes of protocatechuic acid and gallic acid are capable of inhibiting the Cu(II) reduction by both O2•− and Asc−, then they act as highly performing OIL−1. Their reactions with the chelated metal are endergonic, having rate constants about ~10−5–102 M−1 s−1 compared with the Cu(II)(H2O)4 + O2•− and Cu(II)(H2O)4 + Asc−, which are exergonic reactions with rate constants of 4.66 × 109 and 1.33 × 108 M−1 s−1, respectively (Table 2). On the contrary, coumaric acid and ferulic acid are able to prevent the Cu(II) reduction from Asc− but do not inhibit the reduction by O2•−, albeit the reactions with these complexes are slower than with Cu(II)(H2O)4.
These results suggest that, although COA and FLA are able to coordinate copper, it is possible that the chelated metal can be reduced by strong reductants, such as O2•−, producing •OH radicals, through Fenton-type reactions. This is not expected to happen if PRA and GAA coordinate copper.
The OIL−2 behavior was also analyzed, which involves the reactions between the PhAs ligands in the copper complex and the hydroxyl radical (•OH). Different reaction mechanisms may contribute to such reactions, namely, single-electron transfer (SET), formal hydrogen atom transfer (f-HAT) and radical adduct formation (RAF) (Scheme 1). The complexes with PRA and GAA were included in this part to test if they can scavenge •OH radicals formed, even though they do not contribute to their production.
Thermodynamic and kinetic results for the SET mechanism (Path (A) of Scheme 1) are collected in Table 5. The rate constants values for this mechanism are in the range of 10–7–10–9 M–1 s–1. The complex that reacts faster with •OH is Hn−2FLA–2-(2)-C5, while the slowest reactions correspond to that of Hn−2FLA–2-(2)-C2. When copper is coordinated only with water molecules, Cu(II)(4H2O), the value of the Gibbs free energy of reaction with •OH through the SET mechanism becomes 73.85 kcal/mol [79]. It implies that the high values in the rate constants (Table 5) are due to the presence of PhAs in the coordination sphere of Cu(II).
Thermodynamic results for f-HAT mechanisms (Paths (B) and (C) of Scheme 1) are reported in Table 6. All the reactions resulted to be exergonic. COA forms complexes with copper through its fully deprotonated specie. For this reason, the only hydrogens available to be transferred to •OH are those of the water molecules coordinated to copper (Path (C) of Scheme 1). However, the copper complexes with PRA, FLA and GAA as ligands have protonated functional groups that also participate in f-HAT reactions with the •OH radical (Path (B) of Scheme 1). These groups are OCH3 in the FLA complexes and OH in the PRA and GAA complex.
The f-HAT reactions are highly exergonic, with values of Gibbs free energy of reaction ranging from −41.90 to −51.76 kcal/mol, except those originated from the OCH3 group in the FLA complexes, the values of which are −23.63 and −21.83 kcal/mol.
The f-HAT reactions from water molecules binding to copper (Path (C) of Scheme 1) were identified as barrierless (Figure S3), with rate constants (k) controlled by diffusion (Table 6). The same f-HAT mechanism was tested for the reaction between the Cu(II)(4H2O) complex and the •OH radical. It was found that this reaction is endergonic by 1.6 kcal/mol. Those results evidence that Cu(II) coordinated only with water molecules is not able to act as radical scavenger.
For the RAF mechanism (Path (D) of Scheme 1), all the possible sites on the aromatic ring of PhAs numbered in Scheme 1 were considered. The Gibbs free energies of reaction (ΔG), and Gibbs free energies of activation (ΔG≠) through direct addition, are reported in Table S2, while the transition structures are presented in Schemes S4–S8. The ΔG energy values indicate exergonic reactions. However, the ΔG≠ values are negative, suggesting that, in the RAF mechanism, a more complex mechanism is involved, probably implicating the formation of a pre-reactive adduct as a crucial step before the addition reaction (Scheme 2). Therefore, in this case, the RAF reactions were evaluated considering the pre-reactive adduct and not the separated species as the RAF reactants (Table 7). From the results, it emerges that the RAF mechanism does not contribute to the OIL−2 behavior of PhAs, because all the RAF pathways are endergonic processes with high activation barriers.

4. Conclusions

Nopal is a plant containing four phenolic acids: coumaric acid (COA), ferulic acid (FLA), protocatechuic acid (PRA), and gallic acid (GAA). These compounds had been shown to be efficient Cu(II) chelators, yielding five complexes with high thermodynamic stability. This implies that they can be efficient in treatments to detoxify the body from copper.
Dianionic species of PhAs are capable of reducing Cu(II) to Cu(I) and therefore promote the formation of •OH radicals through Fenton-type reactions; for this reason, they can be proposed as species with a behavior of pro-oxidants. However, when the chelates are formed, they can inhibit the reduction of the metal by the reductants of the O2•− and Asc−, i.e., they can be proposed to act as OIL−1, especially the chelates of PRA and GAA, whereas the chelates of COA and FLA inhibit the reduction of Cu(II) by ascorbate and only slightly the reduction by the radical anion superoxide (O2•−).
All the complexes between Cu(II) and PhAs can deactivate the •OH radical through SET and f-HAT reactions that take place at diffusion-controlled rates. Therefore, they can act as OIL−2 agents, inhibiting the damage by hydroxyl free radical immediately as it is formed by Fenton reactions. The PhAs studied in this investigation are proposed as OIL−1 and OIL−2, and therefore they can be proposed as protectors of biomolecules since they inhibit the reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) and therefore the formation of the hydroperoxyl free radical, and additionally, they react with hydroxyl free radical once it is formed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox10122006/s1.

Author Contributions

R.C.-A. and A.P.-G. performed QM calculations. R.C.-A., A.P.-G., N.R., T.M., A.G. analyzed the results. R.C.-A., A.P.-G., N.R., T.M., A.G. wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript. T.M. and A.G. supervised the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale. We gratefully acknowledge the Laboratorio de Visualización y Cómputo Paralelo at UAM - Iztapalapa for the access to its computer facilities. A.P.-G. acknowledges the Program of Cátedras - CONACYT from CONACyT - UAMI (2015–2025), ID-Investigador 435.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Butterfield, D.A.; Hensley, K.; Harris, M.; Mattson, M.; Carney, J. β-Amyloid Peptide Free Radical Fragments Initiate Synaptosomal Lipoperoxidation in a Sequence-Specific Fashion: Implications to Alzheimer′s Disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 200, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Boyd, N.F.; McGuire, V. The possible role of lipid peroxidation in breast cancer risk. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1991, 10, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nelson, R.L. Dietary iron and colorectal cancer risk. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1992, 12, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Knekt, P.; Reunanen, A.; Takkunen, H.; Aromaa, A.; Heliovarara, M.; Hakulinen, T. Body iron stores and risk of cancer. Int. J. Cancer 1994, 56, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Omenn, G.S.; Goodman, G.E.; Thornquist, M.D.; Balmes, J.; Cullen, M.R.; Glass, A.; Keogh, J.P.; Meyskens, F.L.; Valanis, B.; Williams, J.H.; et al. Effects of a Combination of Beta Carotene and Vitamin A on Lung Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 334, 1150–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Panasenko, O.M.; Vol’nova, T.V.; Azizova, O.A.; Vladimirov, Y.A. Free radical modification of lipoproteins and cholesterol accumulation in cells upon atherosclerosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1991, 10, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Steinberg, D. Antioxidants and atherosclerosis. A current assessment. Circulation 1991, 84, 1420–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Riemmersma, R.A.; Wood, D.A.; Macityre, C.C.; Elton, R.A.; Gey, K.F.; Oliver, M.F. Risk of angina pectoris and plasma concentrations of vitamins A, C, and E and carotene. Lancet 1991, 337, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salonen, J.T.; Nyyssoner, K.; Korpela, H.; Tuomilehto, J.; Seppanen, R.; Salonen, R. High stored iron levels are associated with excess risk of myocardial infarction in eastern Finnish men. Circulation 1992, 86, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Street, D.A.; Comstock, G.; Salkeldy, R.; Klag, M. Serum antioxidants and myocardial infarction. Are low levels of carotenoids and alpha-tocopherol risk factors for myocardial infarction? Circulation 1994, 90, 1154–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Pizzino, G.; Irrera, N.; Cucinotta, M.; Pallio, G.; Mannino, F.; Arcoraci, V.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Bitto, A. Oxidative Stress: Harms and Benefits for Human Health. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 8416763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wu, J.Q.; Kosten, T.R.; Zhang, X.Y. Free radicals, antioxidant defense system, and schizophrenia. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 46, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Feugang, J.M.; Konarski, P.; Zou, D.; Stintzing, F.C.; Zou, C. Nutritional and Medicinal Use of Cactus Pear (Opuntia spp.) Cladodes and Fruits. Front. Biosci. 2006, 11, 2574–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Seyoum, A.; Asres, K.; El-Fiky, F.K. Structure-Radical Scavenging Activity Relationships of Flavonoids. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 2058–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saleem, R.; Ahmad, M.; Azmat, A.; Ahmad, S.I.; Faizi, Z.; Abidi, L.; Faizi, S. Hypotensive activity, toxicology and histopathology of opuntioside-I and methanolic extract of Opuntia dilleniid. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 28, 1844–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Corrales-Garcia, J.; Pena-Valdivia, C.B.; Razo-Martinez, Y.; Sanchez-Hernandez, M. Acidity changes and pH-buffering capacity of nopalitos (Opuntia spp.). Post. Biol. Tech. 2004, 32, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, J.H.; Park, S.M.; Ha, H.J.; Moon, C.J.; Shin, T.K.; Kim, J.M.; Lee, N.H.; Kim, H.C.; Jang, K.J.; Wie, M.B. Opuntia ficus-indica attenuates neuronal injury in in vitro and in vivo models of cerebral ischemia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 104, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nuñez-López, M.A.; Paredes-López, O.; Reynoso-Camacho, R. Functional and hypoglycemic properties of nopal cladodes (O. ficus-indica) at different maturity stages using in vitro and in vivo tests. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 10981–10986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Paiz, R.C.; Juárez-Flores, B.I.; Aguirre-Rivera, R.J.; Cárdenas-Ortega, N.C.; Reyes-Agüero, J.A.; García-Chávez, E.; Álvarez-Fuentes, G. Glucose-lowering effect of xoconostle (Opuntia joconostle A. Web., Cactaceae) in diabetic rats. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 2326–2333. [Google Scholar]
  20. Stintzing, F.C.; Schieber, A.; Carle, R. Phytochemical and nutritional significance of cactus pear. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2001, 212, 396–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Galati, E.M.; Mondello, M.R.; Giuffrida, D.; Dugo, G.; Miceli, N.; Pergolizzi, S.; Taviano, M.F. Chemical characterization and biological effects of Sicilian Opuntia ficus indica (L.) mill. Fruit juice: Antioxidant and antiulcerogenic activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4903–4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Galati, E.M.; Mondello, M.R.; Monforte, M.T.; Galluzzo, M.; Miceli, N.; Tripodo, M.M. Effect of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. Cladodes in the Wound-Healing Process. J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev. 2003, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuti, J.O. Antioxidant compounds from four Opuntia cactus pear fruit varieties. Food Chem. 2004, 85, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tesoriere, L.; Allegra, M.; Butera, D.; Livrea, M.A. Absorption, excretion, and distribution of dietary antioxidant betalains in LDLs: Potential health effects of betalains in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zou, D.M.; Brewer, M.; Garcia, F.; Feugang, J.M.; Wang, J.; Zang, R.; Liu, H.; Zou, C. Cactus pear: A natural product in cancer chemoprevention. Nutr. J. 2005, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Dok-Go, H.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, E.H.; Lee, J.; Song, Y.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Jin, C.; Lee, Y.S.; Cho, J. Neuroprotective effects of antioxidative flavonoids, quercetin, (+)-dihydroquercetin and quercetin 3-methyl ether, isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica var. saboten. Brain Res. 2003, 965, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Galati, E.M.; Mondello, M.R.; Lauriano, E.R.; Taviano, M.F.; Galluzzo, M.; Miceli, N. Opuntia ficus indica (L.) Mill. fruit juice protects liver from carbon tetrachloride-induced injury. Phytother. Res. 2005, 19, 796–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sreekanth, D.; Arunasree, M.K.; Roy, K.R.; Chandramohan, T.; Reddy, G.V.; Reddanna, P. Betanin a betacyanin pigment purified from fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica induces apoptosis in human chronic myeloid leukemia Cell line-K562. Phytomedicine 2007, 14, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. El-Mostafa, K.; El Kharrassi, Y.; Badreddine, A.; Andreoletti, P.; Vamecq, J.; El Kebbaj, M.S.E.; Latruffe, N.; Lizard, G.; Nasser, B.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M. Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease. Molecules 2014, 19, 14879–14901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chao, C.Y.; Yin, M.C. Antibacterial effects of roselle calyx extracts and protocatechuic acid in ground beef and apple juice. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lin, C.Y.; Huang, C.S.; Huang, C.Y.; Yin, M.C. Anticoagulatory, antiinflammatory and antioxidative effects of protocatechuic acid in diabetic mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6661–6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kroes, B.H.; van den Berg, A.J.; Quarles van Ufford, H.C.; van Dijk, H.; Labadie, R.P. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Gallic Acid. Planta Med. 1992, 58, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kwon, Y.I.; Vattem, D.A.; Shetty, K. Evaluation of clonal herbs of Lamiaceae species for management of diabetes and hypertension. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 15, 107–118. [Google Scholar]
  34. Stagos, D.; Kazantzoglou, G.; Theofanidou, D.; Kakalopoulou, G.; Magiatis, P.; Mitaku, S.; Kouretas, D. Activity of Grape Extracts from Greek Varieties of Vitis vinifera against Mutagenicity Induced by Bleomycin and Hydrogen Peroxide in Salmonella typhimurium Strain TA102. Mutat. Res. 2006, 609, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdelwahed, A.; Bouhlel, I.; Skandrani, I.; Valenti, K.; Kadri, M.; Guiraud, P.; Steiman, R.; Mariotte, A.M.; Ghedira, K.; Laporte, F.; et al. Study of antimutagenic and antioxidant activities of gallic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-pentagalloylglucose from Pistacia lentiscus. Confirmation by microarray expression profiling. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2007, 165, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kratz, J.M.; Andrighetti-Frohner, C.R.; Kolling, D.J.; Leal, P.C.; Cirne-Santos, C.C.; Yunes, R.A.; Nunes, R.J.; Trybala, E.; Bergstrom, T.; Frugulhetti, I.C.P.P.; et al. Anti-HSV-1 and anti-HIV-1 activity of gallic acid and pentyl gallate. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2008, 103, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Choi, H.J.; Song, J.H.; Bhatt, L.R.; Baek, S.H. Anti-human rhinovirus activity of gallic acid possessing antioxidant capacity. Phytother. Res. 2010, 24, 1292–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Priscilla, D.H.; Prince, P.S.M. Cardioprotective Effect of Gallic Acid on Cardiac Troponin-T, Cardiac Marker Enzymes, Lipid Peroxidation Products and Antioxidants in Experimentally Induced Myocardial Infarction in Wistar Rats. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2009, 179, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhongbing, L.; Guangjun, N.; Belton, P.S.; Tang, H.; Zhao, B. Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis of Antioxidant Ability and Neuroprotective Effect of Gallic Acid Derivatives. Neurochem. Int. 2006, 48, 263–274. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rodriguez-Garcia, M.E.; de Lira, C.; Hernandez-Becerra, E.; Cornejo-Villegas, M.A.; Palacios-Fonseca, A.J.; Rojas-Molina, I.; Reynoso, R.; Quintero, L.C.; Del-Real, A.; Zepeda, T.A.; et al. Physicochemical characterization of nopal pads (Opuntia ficus indica) and dry vacuum nopal powders as a function of the maturation. Plant. Foods Hum. Nutr. 2007, 62, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hernández-Pérez, T.; Carrillo-López, A.; Guevara-Lara, F.; Cruz-Hernández, A.; Paredes-López, O. Biochemical and nutritional characterization of three prickly pear species with different ripening behavior. Plant. Foods Hum. Nutr. 2005, 60, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tesoriere, L.; Fazzari, M.; Allegra, M.; Livrea, M.A. Biothiols, taurine, and lipid-soluble antioxidants in the edible pulp of Sicilian cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruits and changes of bioactive juice components upon industrial processing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 7851–7855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khatabi, O.; Hanine, H.; Elothmani, D.; Hasib, A. Extraction and determination of polyphenols and betalain pigments in the Moroccan prickly pear fruits (Opuntia ficus indica). Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, S278–S281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. De Leo, M.; De Abreu, M.B.; Pawlowska, A.M.; Cioni, P.L.; Braca, A. Profiling the chemical content of Opuntia ficus-indica flowers by HPLC–PDA-ESI-MS and GC/EIMS analyses. Phytochem. Lett. 2010, 3, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ennouri, M.; Evelyne, B.; Laurence, M.; Hamadi, A. Fatty acid composition and rheological behaviour of prickly pear seed oils. Food Chem. 2005, 93, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bensadón, S.; Hervert-Hernández, D.; Sáyago-Ayerdi, S.G.; Goñi, I. By-products of Opuntia ficus-indica as a source of antioxidant dietary fiber. Plant. Food Hum. Nutr. 2010, 65, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gallegos-Infante, J.A.; Rocha-Guzman, N.E.; González-Laredo, R.F.; Reynoso-Camacho, R.; Medina-Torres, L.; Cervantes-Cardozo, V. Effect of air flow rate on the polyphenols content and antioxidant capacity of convective dried cactus pear cladodes (Opuntia ficus indica). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 60, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ginestra, G.; Parker, M.L.; Bennett, R.N.; Robertson, J.; Mandalari, G.; Narbad, A.; Lo Curto, R.B.; Bisignano, G.; Faulds, C.B.; Waldron, K.W. Anatomical, Chemical, and Biochemical Characterization of Cladodes from Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10323–10330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Terpinc, P.; Polak, T.; Segatin, N.; Hanzlowsky, A.; Ulrih, N.P.; Abramovic, H. Antioxidant properties of 4-vinyl derivatives of hydroxycinnamic acids. Food Chem. 2011, 128, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pino, E.; Campos, A.M.; Lopez-Alarcon, C.; Aspee, A.; Lissi, E. Free radical scavenging capacity of hydroxycinnamic acids and related compounds. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2006, 19, 759–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kadoma, Y.; Fujisawa, S. A Comparative Study of the Radical-scavenging Activity of the Phenolcarboxylic Acids Caffeic Acid, p-Coumaric Acid, Chlorogenic Acid and Ferulic Acid, With or Without 2-Mercaptoethanol, a Thiol, Using the Induction Period Method. Molecules 2008, 13, 2488–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Shi, G.F.; An, L.J.; Jiang, B.; Guan, S.; Bao, Y.M. Alpinia protocatechuic acid protects against oxidative damage in vitro and reduces oxidative stress in vivo. Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 403, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hyogo, A.; Kobayashi, T.; del Saz, E.G.; Seguchi, H. Antioxidant Effects of Protocatechuic Acid, Ferulic Acid, and Caffeic Acid in Human Neutrophils Using a Fluorescent Substance. Int. J. Morphol. 2010, 28, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, Y.J. Antimelanogenic and antioxidant properties of gallic acid. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 1052–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Giftson, J.S.; Jayanthi, S.; Nalini, N. Chemopreventive Efficacy of Gallic Acid, an Antioxidant and Anticarcinogenic Polyphenol, against 1, 2-Dimethyl Hydrazine Induced Rat Colon Carcinogenesis. Invest. New Drugs 2010, 28, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Erdemgil, F.Z.; Sanli, S.; Sanli, N.; Ozkan, G.; Barbosa, J.; Guiteras, J.; Beltran, J.L. Determination of pK(a) values of some hydroxylated benzoic acids in methanol-water binary mixtures by LC methodology and potentiometry. Talanta 2007, 72, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Galano, A.; Pérez-González, A. On the free radical scavenging mechanism of protocatechuic acid, regeneration of the catechol group in aqueous solution. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2012, 131, 1265–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Castillo, J.; Benavente-Garcia, O.; Lorente, J.; Alcaraz, M.; Redondo, A.; Ortuno, A.; Del-Rio, J.A. Antioxidant activity and radioprotective effects against chromosomal damage induced in vivo by X-rays of flavan-3-ols (Procyanidins) from grape seeds (Vitis vinifera): Comparative study versus other phenolic and organic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1738–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Fox, D.J. Gaussian 09; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  60. Galano, A.; Alvarez-Idaboy, J.R. A Computational methodology for accurate predictions of rate constants in solution: Application to the assessment of primary antioxidant activity. J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 2430–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zhao, Y.; Schultz, N.E.; Truhlar, D.G. Design of density functionals by combining the method of constraint satisfaction with parametrization for thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2, 364–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Marenich, A.V.; Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Eyring, H. The activated complex in chemical reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1935, 3, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Evans, M.G.; Polanyi, M. Some applications of the transition state method to the calculation of reaction velocities, especially in solution. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1935, 31, 875–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Truhlar, D.G.; Hase, W.L.; Hynes, J.T. Erratum: Current status of transition-state theory. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 2667–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kuppermann, A.; Truhlar, D.G. Exact tunneling calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 1840–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Marcus, R.A. Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory and experiment. Pure Appl. Chem. 1997, 69, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Collins, F.C.; Kimball, G.E. Diffusion-Controlled Reaction Rates. J. Colloid Sci. 1949, 4, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Von Smoluchowski, M. Versucheiner Mathematischen Theorie der Koagulations Kinetic Kolloider Lousungen. Z. Phys. Chem. 1917, 92, 129–168. [Google Scholar]
  70. Einstein, A. Investigations on the theory of the brownian movement. Ann. Phys. 1905, 17, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Bryantsev, V.S.; Diallo, M.S.; Goddard, W.A. Computational study of copper (II) complexation and hydrolysis in aqueous solutions using mixed cluster/continuum models. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 9559–9567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Beltran, J.L.; Sanli, N.; Fonrodona, G.; Barren, D.; Ozkan, G.; Barbosa, J. Spectrophotometric, Potentiometric and Chromatographic pKa Values of Polyphenolic Acids in Water and Acetonitrile-Water Media. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 484, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. León-Carmona, J.R.; Alvarez-Idaboy, J.R.; Galano, A. On the peroxyl scavenging activity of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives: Mechanisms, kinetics, and importance of the acid–base equilibrium. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 12534–12543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Marino, T.; Galano, A.; Russo, N. Radical scavenging ability of gallic acid toward OH and OOH radicals. Reaction mechanism and rate constants from the density functional theory. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 10380–10389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bielski, B.H.J.; Cabelli, D.E.; Arudi, R.L.; Ross, A.B.J. Reactivity of HO2/O−2 Radicals in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1985, 14, 1041–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gaubert, S.; Bouchaut, M.; Brumas, V.; Berthon, G. Copper—Ligand interactions and the physiological free radical processes. Part 3. Influence of histidine, salicylic acid and anthranilic acid on copper-driven Fenton chemistry in vitro. Free Radic. Res. 2000, 32, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Miche, H.; Brumas, V.; Berthon, G. Copper (II) interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. II. Anthranilic acid as a potential OH-inactivating ligand. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1997, 68, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Berthon, G. Is copper pro- or anti-inflammatory? A reconciling view and a novel approach for the use of copper in the control of inflammation. Agents Actions 1993, 39, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Castañeda-Arriaga, R.; Pérez-González, A.; Reina, M.; Alvarez-Idaboy, J.R.; Galano, A. Comprehensive Investigation of the Antioxidant and Pro-oxidant Effects of Phenolic Compounds: A Double-Edged Sword in the Context of Oxidative Stress? J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 6198–6214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 10 02006 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenolic acids (PhAs) in Nopal.
Figure 1. Phenolic acids (PhAs) in Nopal.
Antioxidants 10 02006 g001
Antioxidants 10 02006 sch001 550
Scheme 1. (OIL−2) of PhAs-Cu(II).
Scheme 1. (OIL−2) of PhAs-Cu(II).
Antioxidants 10 02006 sch001
Antioxidants 10 02006 sch002 550
Scheme 2. General RAF mechanism for reactions between PhAs-Cu(II) and •OH.
Scheme 2. General RAF mechanism for reactions between PhAs-Cu(II) and •OH.
Antioxidants 10 02006 sch002
Table
Table 1. Experimental pKa values (with their references) and the molar fractions (Mf) for the different acid-base species of the investigated PhAs, at pH = 7.4.
Table 1. Experimental pKa values (with their references) and the molar fractions (Mf) for the different acid-base species of the investigated PhAs, at pH = 7.4.
PhAspKa1pKa2pKa3pKa4Mf
(HnA)		Mf
(Hn−1A−)		Mf
(Hn−2A−2)		Mf
(Hn−3A−3)		Mf
(Hn−4A−4)		Refs.
COA4.388.68 0.0010.9490.050 [56,72,73]
FLA4.568.65 0.0010.9450.053 [56,73]
PRA4.388.7410.67 0.0010.9550.044<0.001 [56,57]
GAA4.328.249.9713.10.0010.8710.127<0.001<0.001[58,74]
Table
Table 2. Gibbs free energies of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol), reorganization energies (λ, kcal/mol), reaction barriers (ΔG≠, kcal/mol) and rate constants (k, M−1s−1) for the Cu(II) reduction by PhAs, O2•− and Asc−, at 298.15 K and pH = 7.4.
Table 2. Gibbs free energies of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol), reorganization energies (λ, kcal/mol), reaction barriers (ΔG≠, kcal/mol) and rate constants (k, M−1s−1) for the Cu(II) reduction by PhAs, O2•− and Asc−, at 298.15 K and pH = 7.4.
∆Gλ∆G≠k
O2•−−24.0151.873.744.66 × 109
Asc−−4.6734.146.361.33 × 108
HnCOA12.9029.4015.224.34 × 10−2
Hn−1COA–5.4930.7910.698.59 × 104
Hn−2COA2–−16.6428.531.243.96 × 108
HnFLA8.4629.4512.207.11 × 100
Hn−1FLA–2.9429.869.001.47 × 106
Hn−2FLA2–−19.3928.450.724.22 × 108
HnPRA15.6930.9717.578.12 × 10−4
Hn−1PRA–8.1431.3512.434.57 × 103
Hn−2PRA2–−16.1529.961.593.45 × 108
HnGAA15.1931.0517.221.48 × 10−3
Hn−1GAA–8.5031.2012.632.97 × 103
Hn−2GAA2–−17.8030.111.261.01 × 109
Table
Table 3. Conditional Gibbs free energies of reaction (ΔG’, at pH = 7.4, in kcal/mol), and Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution (%MB) for the main complexes of PhAs and Cu(II).
Table 3. Conditional Gibbs free energies of reaction (ΔG’, at pH = 7.4, in kcal/mol), and Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution (%MB) for the main complexes of PhAs and Cu(II).
Complex ΔG’%MB
Hn−2COA2– (2)-C2 Antioxidants 10 02006 i001 Antioxidants 10 02006 i002−22.87~100
Hn−2FLA2– (2)-C5 Antioxidants 10 02006 i003 Antioxidants 10 02006 i004−19.1981.61
Hn−2FLA2– (2)-C2 Antioxidants 10 02006 i005 Antioxidants 10 02006 i006−18.3018.21
Hn−2PRA2– (2)-C7 Antioxidants 10 02006 i007 Antioxidants 10 02006 i008−22.8399.99
Hn−2GAA2– (2)-C7 Antioxidants 10 02006 i009 Antioxidants 10 02006 i010−20.8398.05
Table
Table 4. Gibbs free energies of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol), and rate coefficients (k, M−1 s−1), for the reactions of the PhAs-Cu(II) complexes with the reductants O2•− and Asc−, in aqueous solution at 298.15 K and pH = 7.4.
Table 4. Gibbs free energies of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol), and rate coefficients (k, M−1 s−1), for the reactions of the PhAs-Cu(II) complexes with the reductants O2•− and Asc−, in aqueous solution at 298.15 K and pH = 7.4.
O2•−Asc−
ΔGkΔGk
CuII (H2O)4−24.014.67 × 109−4.671.33 × 108
Hn−2COA2– (2)-C2−15.064.61 × 1074.283.19 × 104
Hn−2FLA2– (2)-C5−13.921.29 × 1085.416.62 × 104
Hn−2FLA2– (2)-C2−14.593.53 × 1074.742.09 × 104
Hn−2PRA2– (2)-C74.131.39 × 10223.461.57 × 10−5
Hn−2GAA2– (2)-C71.354.75 × 10220.693.87 × 10−4
Table
Table 5. Gibbs free energy of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol), Reorganization energies (λ, kcal/mol), Gibbs free energy of activation (ΔG≠, kcal/mol), and rate constants (k, M–1 s–1) for the SET reactions between PhAs-Cu(II) and •OH.
Table 5. Gibbs free energy of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol), Reorganization energies (λ, kcal/mol), Gibbs free energy of activation (ΔG≠, kcal/mol), and rate constants (k, M–1 s–1) for the SET reactions between PhAs-Cu(II) and •OH.
PhAs-Cu(II)∆Gλ∆G≠k
Hn−2COA–2-(2)-C2−31.7214.015.594.64 × 108
Hn−2FLA–2-(2)-C5−28.0117.361.637.36 × 109
Hn−2FLA–2 -(2)-C2−35.6114.767.372.46 × 107
Hn−2PRA–2-(2)-C7−38.9017.246.816.29 × 107
Hn−2GAA–2-(2)-C7−39.3617.416.925.21 × 107
Table
Table 6. Gibbs free energy of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol) and rate constants (k, M–1 s–1) for the f-HAT reactions between PhAs-Cu(II) and •OH.
Table 6. Gibbs free energy of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol) and rate constants (k, M–1 s–1) for the f-HAT reactions between PhAs-Cu(II) and •OH.
PhAs-Cu(II)∆Gk
Hn−2COA–2-(2)-C2
from H2O		−42.212.81 × 109
Hn−2FLA–2-(2)-C5
from H2O		−41.908.07 × 109
Hn−2FLA–2-(2)-C5
from FLA (site OCH3)		−23.638.06 × 109
Hn−2FLA–2-(2)-C2
from H2O		−46.288.08 × 109
Hn−2FLA–2-(2)-C2
from FLA (site OCH3)		−21.838.08 × 109
Hn−2PRA–2-(2)-C7
from H2O		−46.807.96 × 109
Hn−2GAA–2-(2)-C7
from GAA (site OH)		−51.768.03 × 109
Hn−2GAA–2-(2)-C7
from H2O		−47.558.03 × 109
Table
Table 7. Gibbs free energy of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol), Gibbs free energy of activation (ΔG≠, kcal/mol) and rate constants (k, M–1 s–1) for the RAF mechanism between PhAs-Cu(II) and •OH, since pre-reactive adduct. Solvent = water.
Table 7. Gibbs free energy of reaction (ΔG, kcal/mol), Gibbs free energy of activation (ΔG≠, kcal/mol) and rate constants (k, M–1 s–1) for the RAF mechanism between PhAs-Cu(II) and •OH, since pre-reactive adduct. Solvent = water.
PhAs-Cu(II) ΔGΔG≠k
Hn−2COA2–-(2)-C2RAF-111.1817.538.76 × 10−1
Hn−2COA2–-(2)-C2RAF-26.3517.904.72 × 10−1
Hn−2COA2–-(2)-C2RAF-32.1912.464.57 × 103
Hn−2COA2–-(2)-C2RAF-45.6412.991.85 × 103
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C5RAF-112.4320.111.13 × 10−2
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C5RAF-2NF--
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C5RAF-34.1817.815.44 × 10−1
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C5RAF-41.8014.541.37 × 102
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C5RAF-57.3818.153.06 × 10−1
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C5RAF-65.0716.218.17 × 100
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C2RAF-113.5718.671.28 × 10−1
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C2RAF-26.2918.362.14 × 10−1
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C2RAF-30.8414.431.63 × 102
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C2RAF-45.9011.701.64 × 104
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C2RAF-56.7215.125.09 × 101
Hn−2FLA2–-(2)-C2RAF-65.6015.801.61 × 101
Hn−2PRA2–-(2)-C7RAF-19.8318.938.24 × 10−2
Hn−2PRA2–-(2)-C7RAF-28.1216.832.88 × 100
Hn−2PRA2–-(2)-C7RAF-37.6513.141.44 × 103
Hn−2PRA2–-(2)-C7RAF-46.1812.534.05 × 103
Hn−2PRA2–-(2)-C7RAF-510.2617.984.12 × 10−1
Hn−2PRA2–-(2)-C7RAF-65.5214.531.38 × 102
Hn−2GAA2–-(2)-C7RAF-111.6020.121.10 × 10−2
Hn−2GAA2–-(2)-C7RAF-28.2518.859.40 × 10−2
Hn−2GAA2–-(2)-C7RAF-310.6615.741.79 × 101
Hn−2GAA2–-(2)-C7RAF-46.5313.429.05 × 102
Hn−2GAA2–-(2)-C7RAF-57.3017.401.09 × 100
Hn−2GAA2–-(2)-C7RAF-68.7417.032.05 × 100
NF = not formed.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castañeda-Arriaga, R.; Perez-Gonzalez, A.; Marino, T.; Russo, N.; Galano, A. Antioxidants into Nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica), Important Inhibitors of Free Radicals’ Formation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10122006

AMA Style

Castañeda-Arriaga R, Perez-Gonzalez A, Marino T, Russo N, Galano A. Antioxidants into Nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica), Important Inhibitors of Free Radicals’ Formation. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(12):2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10122006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castañeda-Arriaga, Romina, Adriana Perez-Gonzalez, Tiziana Marino, Nino Russo, and Annia Galano. 2021. "Antioxidants into Nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica), Important Inhibitors of Free Radicals’ Formation" Antioxidants 10, no. 12: 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10122006

APA Style

Castañeda-Arriaga, R., Perez-Gonzalez, A., Marino, T., Russo, N., & Galano, A. (2021). Antioxidants into Nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica), Important Inhibitors of Free Radicals’ Formation. Antioxidants, 10(12), 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10122006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop